65
Site Closure and Redevelopment of MGP Sites in Iowa Dean Hargens, Alliant Energy Charlottesville, VA April 2004

MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Site Closure and Redevelopment of MGP Sites in Iowa

Dean Hargens, Alliant EnergyCharlottesville, VA

April 2004

Page 2: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Alliant Energy

• Merge of:– IES Industries– Interstate Power Co.– Wisconsin Power & Light Co.

• Corporate offices located in:– Cedar Rapids and Dubuque, IA– Madison, WI

Page 3: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Alliant Energy

• Energy Services in:– Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois– China, Brazil, New Zealand

• Number of employees-8,940• Number of electric customers-956,690• Number of gas customers-404,976• Generation

– 31 power plants– 5,200 MW output

Page 4: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Manufactured Gas Plants

• History and Overview• Remediation• Closure and Beneficial Reuse

Page 5: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Manufactured Gas Plants

History and Overview

Page 6: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Alliant Energy MGP Sites

• 57 MGP sites in 6 states• 34 sites in Iowa• 22 soil remedial actions to date

Page 7: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Alliant Energy MGP Sites

Page 8: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Manufactured Gas

• Substantial US industry from 1816 to 1960• Called gas plants, gasworks, or town gas

plants • Combustible gas for heating, cooking, and

lighting• Produced gas from coal and petroleum• “Baked” coal to the point where gases were

emitted

Page 9: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Manufactured Gas

• Collected gas in large tanks/holders after processing

• Piped gas to residents and businesses for lights, stoves, water heaters and other uses

• As gas cooled, coal tar liquids condensed from gas stream into:– Storage structures such as tar well– Gas piping– Gas holder

Page 10: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Manufactured Gas

• Manufactured gas was an important phase of industrial heritage in USA

• Important role in the industrial expansion of the United States

• Used the way natural gas is used today• Eventually replaced by natural gas and

propane

Page 11: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Process Overview

• Heated coal in a closed vessel (retort) to produce gas

• Cooled gas in condenser to remove water vapor and tar

• Water vapor and tar sent to tar separator• Cleaned gas to remove ammonia, hydrogen

sulfide, cyanide, and light oils• Stored purified gas in holder on site• Distributed gas to community

Page 12: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

MGP Structures

• Retort• Tar/water condenser• Tar/water separator• Purifier/scrubber• Tar well/cistern• Gas holder

Page 13: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation
Page 14: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Gas Retort Benches

Page 15: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Knoxville, IA, circa 1918

Page 16: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation
Page 17: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation
Page 18: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation
Page 19: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Chariton, IA

Page 20: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation
Page 21: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation
Page 22: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Gas PurifiersBoone, IA

Page 23: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Boone, IA

Gas HoldersPurifiers

Page 24: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

MGP Byproducts

• Dictated by manufacturing process• Tars and oils• Spent oxides from hydrogen sulfide

removal• Ash, clinker, and coke

Page 25: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

MGP Byproducts

• Sold for other uses:– Feedstock for chemical industry– Sealers– Dandruff shampoo

• Disposed of as waste material on or off site

• Negative effects of coal tar and other byproducts were unknown

Page 26: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Potential Environmental Impact

• Condensed tar during gas storage– Gas holder

• Byproducts generated during processing– Purifier– Tar separator

• Byproduct disposal in onsite structures– Tar well/cistern

• Spills during operation

Page 27: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Potential Environmental Impact

• Buried byproducts present environmental concerns

• Buried byproducts present health concerns– Dermal contact with impacted soil– Drinking impacted ground water

Page 28: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

MGP Byproduct Chemistry

• Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)– Formed during the incomplete combustion

of coal– Common in petroleum-derived products

such as tar, asphalt, coal tar pitch• Volatile aromatic compounds

– Contained in light crude oils that were components of generated tar

Page 29: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

MGP Byproduct Chemistry

• Cyanide and Ammonia– In spent oxides formed by passing gas over iron

filings and wood chips to remove hydrogen sulfide

• Phenols– In coal tar acids formed during cooling of gas– Coal carbonization process only

• Trace metals– In gas plant ash and spent oxides

Page 30: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

MGP Sites

• Estimated 1,000 to 1,500 in US per EPA• Estimated 25,000-50,000 in US per

other sources• Over 500 in Midwest (circa 1909)• Alliant Energy responsible for over 40

sites in 6 states

Page 31: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Manufactured Gas Plants

Remediation

Page 32: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Tar Cistern - East

Page 33: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Tar Separator Tar Separator

Page 34: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

1212--inch Pipeinch Pipe

Tar Separator

Page 35: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Tar/Oil Holder

Page 36: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Tar/Oil Holder

Page 37: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Water Well ?

Page 38: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Tar Cistern Tar Cistern -- SouthSouth

Page 39: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Tar SeparatorTar Separator

Page 40: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Remedial ActionRemedial Action

Tar SeparatorTar Separator

Page 41: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Main Gas Holder

Relief Gas Relief Gas HolderHolder

Page 42: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Contents of Relief Holder

Page 43: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Relief Holder Relief Holder -- EmptyEmpty

Page 44: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Remedial ActionRemedial Action

Main Gas HolderMain Gas Holder

Regulator BuildingRegulator BuildingFoundationFoundation

Valve BoxValve Box

Page 45: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Valve BoxValve Box

Page 46: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Valve BoxValve BoxPipingPiping

Page 47: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Main Gas Holder Main Gas Holder -- EmptyEmpty

Page 48: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation
Page 49: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Manufactured Gas Plants

Closure and Beneficial Reuse

Page 50: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Closure

• Remove source structures/material• Remediate soil to allow for future use

– Environmentally acceptable endpoints

• Establish use restrictions as necessary– Address residual contamination

• Conduct groundwater monitoring– Concurrent with beneficial use

Page 51: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Soil Cleanup Criteria

• Soil 0-6 feet– 500 mg/kg total PAHs– 100 mg/kg total Group B2 PAHs– 100 mg/kg TPH

• Soil below 6 feet– 3,000 mg/kg total PAHs– 200 mg/kg total Group B2 PAHs– 3,800 mg/kg TPH

Page 52: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

PAHs

• Acenaphthene• Acenaphthylene• Anthracene• Benzo(a)anthracene*• Benzo(a)pyrene*• Benzo(b)fluoranthene*• Benzo(g,h,i)perylene• Benzo(k)fluoranthene*

• Chrysene*• Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene*• Fluoranthene• Fluorene• Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene*• Naphthalene• Phenanthrene• Pyrene

*Group B2 PAHs (carcinogenic)

Page 53: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Ground Water Compliance Standards

• Non-protected ground water• Protected ground water

– Water bearing unit• Hydraulic conductivity > 5.1x10-4 cm/sec• TDS < 2,500 mg/L

• 8 sampling events– Steady or declining plume– Natural attenuation– Concentration less than compliance standards– Source removal completed

Page 54: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Ground Water Compliance Standards

Chemical Protected Non-Protected

Benzene 5 120

Toluene 1,000 7,000

Ethylbenzene 700 3,500

Total Xylenes 10,000 70,000

Acenaphthene 420 2,100

Acenaphthylene 210 1,100

Anthracene 2,100 11,000

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.24 4.8

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.2 4

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.24 4.8

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 210 1,100

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2.4 48

Chrysene 24 480

Page 55: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Ground Water Compliance Standards

Chemical Protected Non-Protected

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.024 0.48

Fluoranthene 280 1,400

Fluorene 280 1,400

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.24 4.8

Naphthalene 20 700

Phenanthrene 210 1,100

Pyrene 210 1,100

Cyanide 200 1,000

Arsenic 50 100

Barium 2,000 10,000

Cadmium 5 100

Chromium 100 500

Lead 15 300

Page 56: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Beneficial Reuse

• Commercial/industrial developments• Substations• Pole storage yards• Green spaces

Page 57: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Fairfield MGP Site

Page 58: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Storm Lake MGP Site

Page 59: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Grinnell MGP Site

Page 60: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Iowa Falls MGP Site

Page 61: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Muscatine MGP Site

Page 62: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Atlantic MGP Site

Page 63: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Charlottesville MGP

• Located at 4th and Williams Streets NW• Operated prior to 1887 to 1951• 1922 statistics

– 1,600 customers– Population of 10, 688– Cost of gas was $1.50 per cubic foot

• Gas holder and relief gas holder

Page 64: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Charlottesville MGP-1902

Page 65: MGP Site Evaluation and Investigation

Charlottesville MGP-1920