Master Plan 2050 Public Open House #1 - Airport Projects · 2018-08-13 · Short List Strategy #1. Short List Strategy #2. Alt. Alt. Alt. Alt. Alt. Alt. Charrette #2. Charrette #3

Master Plan 2050Public Open House #1

August 7, 2018

What is a Master Plan?

• A comprehensive study of an airport, describing the short-, mid-, and long-term development plans to meet future aviation demand at an airport

• Can be thought of as a tool which provides the framework necessary to guide potential airport development, while considering both internal and external impacts

• Guidelines should be consistent with local, state, and national goals

• Each Master Plan is unique, the focus of work will vary from airport to airport. A few goals of a Master Plan are:

•To determine future aviation demand at an airport•To thoroughly explore concepts and alternatives on technical, economical, and environmental bases•To provide a graphical representation of future airport development and land use•To establish a schedule for implementation of proposed development•To identify a realistic financial plan to support development•To prepare and present a plan to the public that thoroughly addresses any relevant issues and adheres to local, state and federal regulations•To establish a framework for a continuous planning process

Master Plan Process

Visioning, Inventory, &

Forecast

Requirements

Alternatives Development & Evaluation

EnvironmentalConditions

Safety RiskAssessment

Implementation

FinancialFeasibility

StartFinish

We are herePublic Meeting #1

Public Meeting #2

Public Meeting #3

Master Plan updated every 5-10 years

Why Update the Master Plan?

• Previous Master Plan - 2013• Operational changes at CVG since completion of previous study

• Continued shift from hub-based activity to 85%+ local traffic• Return and growth of air cargo operations• Demand for aeronautical and non-aeronautical development

• Need to review age, condition, availability and sustainability of existing passenger terminal facilities

Key Areas of Focus

• Developing concourse redevelopment plan• Ensuring airfield compliance• Supporting passenger and cargo development• Identify landside improvements to support CONRAC and cargo

developments

CVG Today - Airfield

11,000’ x 150’12,000’ x 150’

18C

36C

18L

36R

18R

36L09 27 10,000’ x 150’

8,000’ x 150’

Donaldson Hwy.

Terminal Drive

I-275

South Airfield Dr.

N. Bend Rd.

CVG Centre

CVG Today - Terminal

Main Terminal

Concourse A

22 Gates

Concourse B

28 Gates

Runw

ay 18C –

36C

Runway 09 - 27

Runw

ay 18L –36R

ValuPark

Donaldson Hwy.

Terminal Drive

I-275

Terminal Garages

CVG Today - Cargo

Runw

ay 18C–

36C

Runway 09 - 27

DHL

Runw

ay 18L –36R

Runw

ay 18R –

36L

Fed Ex

Passenger Forecast Summary

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 2037 2040 2043 2046 2049

Enplaned Passengers (in millions)Domestic International Domestic Enplaned

Passengers

8.5 millionin 2050

International Enplaned Passengers

1.1 millionin 2050

Total EnplanedPassengers

9.6 millionin 2050

Note: Draft Forecast subject to FAA review and approval.

Cargo Throughput Forecast Summary

◄ Historical Forecast ►

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030 2033 2036 2039 2042 2045 2048

Cargo Throughput (in millions of tons)

1.1 Million tons in 2017

6.7 Million tons in 2050


Aircraft Operations Forecast Summary

◄ Historical Forecast ►

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 2037 2040 2043 2046 2049

Aircraft Operations (in thousands)Domestic Passenger International Passenger Cargo Other

Passenger Aircraft Operations

200,380in 2050

Cargo Aircraft Operations

245,840in 2050

Other Aircraft Operations

12,850in 2050

Total Aircraft Operations

459,070in 2050


Concourse Development

Gate Requirements

Preferred Terminal/Concourse

Preferred Strategy

Alt. Alt.

Status Quo Clean Slate Maintain/RebuildA

Maintain/RebuildB

Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 3 Alt. 4 Alt. 5 Alt. 6 Alt. 7 Alt. 8 Alt. 9 Alt. 10 Alt. 11 Alt. 12Charrette #1

Short List Strategy #1 Short List Strategy #2

Alt. Alt. Alt. Alt. Alt. Alt.

Charrette #2

Charrette #3

Term

inal

Con

cept

s Pr

oces

s

Leve

l 1Le

vel 2

Leve

l 3Le

vel 4

4 Strategic Families We are here• Qualitative Evaluation Only• Indicates best solutions to meet

goals & objectives• Comparative Analysis

(O&M & Capital Cost)

Cost refinement• Planning level estimates for capital• Comparative analysis of O&M

Financial Modeling• Implementation and Phasing Planned• Year by year cost modeling

Existing Gates

Gate Requirements2017Gates

PAL 1(2022)Gates

PAL 2 (2027)Gates

PAL 3 (2037)Gates

PAL 4 (2050)Gates

Minimum 51 32 38 42 48 57Maximum 38 48 51 58 69•Minimum gate requirements based on 100% common use•Maximum gate requirements based on preferential use (min 3 turns/day)•Exclusive and preferential gates will increase the requirement•Gating analysis will refine requirement

Families APM Connection FIS Relocation

Family 1: Status Quo – Keep A & B Requires APMLimited Area at Main

Terminal to Relocate Int’l Gates

Family 2: Clean Slate – Close A & B APM Not Required Enables New FIS Facility

Family 3: Maintain/Rebuild A –Close B APM Not Required Requires New FIS Facility

Family 4: Maintain/Rebuild B –Close A Requires APM Enables New FIS Facility

TERM

CONCOURSE A

CONCOURSE B

TERM

CONCOURSE A

TERM

CONCOURSE B

Gating Concept Families

Concourse Development Process

FIS

TERM

FIS

FIS

FIS

Family 1 - Concept 1

Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway

Future Reconfiguration

Future Apron

Existing BuildingCONRAC Facility

Future New FIS

Tunnel with APMTunnel with Moving Walkway Only

Maximum Walking Distance

Physical Connection to FIS


Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS





Object Free Area

Taxilane / Taxiway


Future Apron


Future New FIS




Evaluation Criteria

AIRSIDE

A Airside Circulation / Operations Does the configuration of the concourse(s) maintain or improve the taxiing of aircraft from east to west without creating significant numbers of gates that have independent pushback operations?

TERMINAL

B Passenger Journey The configuration of the concourse(s) minimizes the number of level changes and the potential unassisted walking distance required for passengers to flow from the main terminal to their gate and from their gate to the main terminal.

C APM Needed Does the concourse configuration eliminate the need for an APM (train/people-mover)?

D Baggage Operations Does the concourse configuration allow for the implementation of a simplified baggage handling system with consolidated baggage screening?

E International Passenger Arrivals Does the concourse configuration allow for international arriving passengers to exit the Customs and Border Protection facility directly to the landside without having to be rescreened?

F Future Flexibility Does the concourse configuration support both future hubbing operations and flexibility O&D operations and airline gate allocations?

IMPLEMENTATION

G Impact to Existing Facilities Does the concourse configuration limit the impact to existing non-passenger related structures.

H Infrastructure Re-Use Does the concourse configuration reduce the need to construct new facilities by providing the ability to re-use existing concourse/gate infrastructure?

I Phasing Is it feasible to phase the construction of the concourse configuration in a way that limits the impacts to existing gate operations and does not require the construction of temporary gates?

J Project "Off-Ramps" Allows for incremental facility expansion that provides for flexibility in modifying the plan at project milestones. The ultimate configuration is able to be modified over time to adjust to changing conditions at the airport.

Evaluation Criteria Descriptions

Initial Concepts Carried Forward

1-1 1-3 2-1

3-1 4-22-2

Documents

Master Plan 2050 Public Open House #1 - Airport Projects · 2018-08-13 · Short List Strategy #1. Short List Strategy #2. Alt. Alt. Alt. Alt. Alt. Alt. Charrette #2. Charrette #3