Make Us One With Christ

8/6/2019 Make Us One With Christ

1/42

Make Us One with Christ:

The Study Guide VersionPrepared by the offices of

Ecumenical and Interfaith RelationsThe Episcopal Church

815 Second AvenueNew York, NY 10017

and

The General Commission on Christian Unity and InterreligiousConcerns

of The United Methodist Church475 Riverside Drive Room 1300

New York, NY 10115

Thomas Ferguson, Ph.D.Associate Deputy

Rev. W. Douglas Mills, Ph.D.Associate General Secretary

for Dialogue and Interfaith Relations


2/42


3/42

This study guide and The United Methodist Church dialogues with

The Episcopal Church are funded through the support of the

Interdenominational Cooperation Fund. The Interdenominational

Cooperation Fund apportionment was established in 1952 to:N support ecumenical efforts around the world;

Nwitness to the Christian faith;

N foster a renewal of Christian unity and understanding;

N meet human suffering; and

N advocate for global peace and justice.

Giving faithfully to the Interdenominational Cooperation Fund

apportionment nurtures the ministries of Churches Uniting in Christ, the

National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA, the World Council of

Churches, JustPeace, the World Methodist Council and the Commission on

Pan-Methodist Cooperation and Union.

For more information about the Interdenominational Cooperation Fund or

to order promotional materials, please visit www.umcgiving.org.

This study guide and The United Methodist Church-Episcopal Church

dialogue are funded by the General Convention of the Episcopal Church, as

part of the Office of the Presiding Bishop. We are thankful for contributions

by dioceses to support the national and international mission work of The

Episcopal Church, so that we might strive to restore all people in unity with

God and each other in Christ. (Book of Common Prayer, Catechism, p. 855.)More information, please visit www.episcopalchurch.org/ecumenism

Make Us One With Christ 3


4/42

MAKE US ONEWTH CHRIST:THE STUDY GUIDE VERSION

A PROCESS FORFACILITATING FELLOWSHIP AMONG

EPISCOPAL AND UNITED METHODIST CONGREGATIONS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6Session Summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7

Session OneGetting to Know One Another, Part A . . . . . . . .8

Sessions TwoSharing Our Histories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9

Session ThreeThe Faith We Have In Common . . . . . . . . . .10

Session FourStructure and Polity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11Session FiveMinistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12

Session SixPlanning for a Life of Full Communion . . . . . . .13

Session SevenCelebrating the Eucharist Together . . . . . . . . .14

Evaluation and Planning Response Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15

Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16



5/42

This Study Guide version ofMake Us

One With Christis a process guide for useby congregations of The Episcopal Churchand The United Methodist Church as welive into the period of Interim EucharisticSharing inaugurated in 2006. It is thecongregations, clergy, and lay people ofThe Episcopal Church and The UnitedMethodist Church that will live out fullcommunion in mission and witness in its

most fundamental and meaningful sense.Through the process outlined in thisstudy guide, congregations from eachcommunion will explore each othershistory, traditions, faith, worship, and life.It will also guide congregations in lookingat how they might engage in commonmission in their communities. Thisdiscussion guide assumes:

1. Two congregations, one Episcopal andone United Methodist, from the samecommunity have agreed to engage witheach other in this discussion;

2. Each congregation will be representedin the discussion by roughly the samenumber of people, most likely 10-12from each congregation but with otheroptions possible;

3. Sessions will be held weekly or

biweekly, with representatives of thetwo congregations sharing leadership asappropriate and jointly planning howdiscussions will be structured; eachsession may last up to one and a halfhours;

4. Sessions will meet alternately in eachcongregations building and begin with

worship led by the host congregation in

a manner so as to express something ofits authentic liturgical and devotionaltradition, concluding with a jointEucharistic service at the last session;

5. Participants from each congregation,under the guidance of their clergy

where possible, will complete theappropriate evaluation and planningresponse form and return it to The

United MethodistEpiscopal ChurchDialogue.1

This discussion process is self-explanatory and requires few additionalresources. However, plan carefully so thatleadership may be shared between the twocongregations and participants may havethe best opportunity to see what fullcommunion between The Episcopal

Church and The United MethodistChurch may mean for their congregationswitness.

6 Make Us One With Christ

Introduction

1Return completed evaluation forms to: The United MethodistEpiscopal Dialogue Team, c/o The Office of Ecumenical and Interfaith Relations,

815 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10017.


6/42

Session OneProviding opportunityfor participants to begin to knowone another and to be introducedto the present dialogue betweenThe United Methodist Church andThe Episcopal Church, a dialoguewhose goal is full communion by2012.

Session TwoThe session providesan opportunity to look at a briefhistory of the two communions.

Sessions Three, Four, and FiveInthese sessions, participants explorethree areas which will be importantin the hoped-for full communionrelationship between our twochurches: (1) the faith we have in

common; (2) structure and polity;and (3) ordered (i.e., ordained)ministry (including the role ofbishops) and the ministry of thelaity.

Session SixThis sessionconcentrates on having participantsbrainstorm ways their twocongregations might live into fullcommunion.

Session SevenThis closing sessionhas two parts: first, participants willtake their brainstorming ideas fromsession five and decide on somepractical next steps together;second, the Study Guide processwill conclude with a jointcelebration of the Eucharist.While the first and second sessions

and the last two sessions need to bedone in order, sessions three throughfive may be reordered to suit the

needs and calendars of participatingcongregations.

Thank you for your participationand Gods blessings as you begin yourstudy!


Session Summaries


7/42

OBJECTIVES

By the end of this session, participants will havebegun to:

1. Know each other as individuals and as people offaith;

2. Know each others congregation, identifyingsimilarities and differences; and

3. Know the goal of the present dialogue between TheUnited Methodist Church and The EpiscopalChurch

PREPARATIONS

Prior to the start of the session, consider making thefollowing preparations:Have simple refreshments available;Arrange chairs in a large circle so participants can easily

see and hear each other;Have a name tag available for each participant;Have available a flip chart, paper, markers, and masking

tape (or a chalk board and chalk);The host congregation for this session should prepare a

brief opening worship drawing on its authenticliturgical and devotional tradition (see Activity Abelow);

Have teams of two or three from each congregation

prepared to introduce their congregation to thewhole group (see Activity B); andHave one or more persons from each congregation

prepare to present a brief history of their respectivecommunion (see Activity D for two suggestions onhow this might be done).

ACTIVITY A Opening Worship 15 minutes

Representatives of the host congregation, afterwelcoming participants, should lead a brief worship period.This could be an Evening Prayer Service, or anotherservice, as appropriate to the time of day or time of year

the congregational study is taking place.

ACTIVITY B Introductions 30 minutes

With participants seated in a circle, invite them tointroduce themselves, telling their name, congregation, andhow long they have been a member, and sharing what theyrecall or know of their baptism and something of theirpersonal faith journey.

When all have had the opportunity to introduce

themselves, invite participants to discussWhat do we seem to have in common as individuals?How do we seem to be different as individuals?

Note these similarities and difference on the flip chartor chalkboard.

ACTIVITY C Congregational Introductions 30 minutes

Ask each team to introduce its congregation to thegroup. The introduction might contain some or all of thefollowing:

A brief history of the congregation;The congregations self-understanding of its mission

and identity-defining core values;Something of the congregations programmatic

ministry, including its support of and participationin denominational and ecumenical ministry; and

Something of the congregations organization andgovernance.

When the two teams have finished their introductions,invite participants to discuss

What do we seem to have in common as congregations?How do we seem to be different as congregations?What might we be able to learn or appropriate from

each other as faith communities?

Again, note the similarities, differences, and possiblelearnings on the flip chart or chalkboard.

ACTIVITY D The goal of the current dialogue

The story of Anglican-Methodist Dialogue is told inAppendix A. One of the facilitators should summarize thishistory for the members of the group. This study session isso that people in both our churches can become moreaware of this dialogue and what Episcopalians and UnitedMethodists have in common.

Share the definition of full communion, also in

Appendix A. Ask people what they think of therelationship described: How does it sound?

CLOSING 5 minutes

Close with prayer.

Be sure to remind people when and in whichcongregation the next session will be held!


Getting to Know One AnotherSession One


8/42

History is important for both our communions.

Consequently it is important that participants sharecommon understanding of each others communion storyover time. While this might be accomplished in a varietyof ways, here are two ideas for how it might be donewithin the time available.

PREPARATIONS Follow the list of preparations made for Session One.

The co-faciliators should study the material inAppendix B.

Prepare the Opening Worship using materials fromThe Episcopal Church Book of Common Prayerand the United Methodist Book of CommonWorship.

ACTIVITY A Opening Worship. 15 minutesBefore the worship take time for each person to say

their name.

ACTIVITY B Sharing History Highlights 55 minutesDistribute the historical material (found in Appendix

B) and have someone (either one or both of the clergy ora pair of lay persons) provide a summary and overview.

Afterwards ask these questions:

What surprised you about your own history?

What surprised you about the history of the otherchurch?

ACTIVITY C Closing prayer. 5 minutes

Be sure to remind people when and in whichcongregation the next session will be held!


Sharing History HighlightsSession Two


9/42

PREPARATION

Follow the list of preparations made for Session One.

The co-facilitators should study the material inAppendix C.

ACTIVITY A Introductions 10 minutes

Unless you are sure participants have come to knoweach others names, invite each to briefly introduce herselfor himself.

ACTIVITY B Worship 15 minutes

Representatives of the host congregation, afterwelcoming participants, should lead a brief worship period.

ACTIVITY C Small Group Discussion 55 minutes

Have people divide up into a number of small groups,either two or more depending on the number attending.Have each group read through, out loud, The Faith WeAffirm.

After the group has read this, then move on to thesuggested questions.

A special note to those theologically trained:Allow the

discussion to settle at a level suitable to participantscapabilities. The point is not to have a nuanced dogmaticdiscussion, but, rather, to realize that our two communionsdo share a substantial body of faith in common.

After the small groups have had ample time to discuss,gather the whole group and ask each small group to reportits findings.

ACTIVITY D Small Group Discussion 15 minutes

For both our traditions, our faith is also lived out inworship. Break the group up into smaller groups withmixed United Methodist and Episcopal representation.

Ask each group to come up with some favorite hymns ofCharles Wesley that both our traditions share. What dothese hymns say about what we believe?

CLOSING 5 minutes

Remind participants of the activities planned and themeeting place for the next session. Close with prayer.


The Faith We AffirmSession Three


10/42

OBJECTIVE

By the end of this session, participants will have begunto understand how each communion structures andgoverns itself.

PREPARATIONS

Well in advance of this session, select two participantsfrom each congregation to be presenters.

One person from each congregation shouldprepare a presentation (lasting no more than tenminutes) on how her/his communion is structured(using the resource on polity in Appendix D).One person from each congregation shouldprepare a presentation (lasting no more than tenminutes) on how her/his communion is governed(using the resource on polity in Appendix D).One person from each congregation to presentshould be prepared to present the demographicoverviews of the two churches (using the resourceprovided in Appendix E)

As always, have refreshments, name tags, etc. available;arrange the room with chairs in a circle, and have a flipchart and markers or chalkboard and chalk available.

ACTIVITY A Introductions

Unless you are sure participants have come to knoweach others names, invite each to briefly introduce herselfor himself.



ACTIVITY C Presentations and Discussion 1 hour

There is a lot to cover in this activity and limited time(presentations themselves could take almost half of thetime allotted). Participants at least need to (a) hear thepresentations, (b) have an opportunity to ask clarifyingquestions, and (c) note similarities and differences betweenthe communions. Choose one of the following two ways tohandle all this material.

Option 1Divide the total group into three sections. One section

will hear, respond to, and report on the presentations onstructure; the second will hear, respond to, and report onthe presentations on governance; a third will hear, respondto, and report the presentation on demographics

Instruct the sections to take no more than 15-20minutes to (a) listen to the presentation on the assignedtopic, (b) pose clarifying questions, (c) discuss similaritiesand differences between the two communions on theassigned topic, and (d) prepare a summary of theirdiscussion for the whole group to hear.

After the two sections have had opportunity tocomplete their tasks, reconvene the whole group and askeach section to report on its conversation.

Option 2Keeping the groups together, allow about 15-20minutes for presentations and discussion on each topic.After each topic has been discussed, be sure to have thegroup note differences and similarities between the twocommunions.

CLOSING 5 minutes



Stucture and PolitySession Four


11/42

OBJECTIVES

By the end of this session, participants will have:

1. Explored similarities and differences in the way thetwo communions order (ordained) ministry;

2. Identified ways the two communions understandministry to include lay persons; and

3. Explored the ways the two communions understandthe role and responsibilities of the episcopacy.

PREPARATIONS

One from each congregation should prepare apresentation (lasting no more than ten minutes) onhow her/his communion understands the ordainedministry, including the different orders (deaconswhether transitional or permanent,priests/presbyters, etc.), using the resource inAppendix F

One from each congregation should prepare apresentation (lasting no more than ten minutes) onhow her/his communion understands the ministryof the laity and its relationship to the ordainedministry, using the resource in Appendix F

One from each congregation should prepare apresentation (lasting no more than ten minutes) onhow her/his communion understands bishops,using the resource in Appendix F

As always, have refreshments, name tags, etc.available; arrange the room with chairs in a circle,and have a flip chart and markers or chalkboardand chalk available.

ACTIVITY A Introductions

Unless you are sure participants have come to know

each others names, invite each to briefly introduce herselfor himself.



ACTIVITY C Presentations and Discussion 1 hour

Option 1Divide the total group into three sections. One section

will hear, respond to, and report on the presentations onordained ministry; the second will hear, respond to, andreport on the presentations on ministry of the laity; a thirdwill hear, respond to, and report on the presentation onbishops

Instruct the sections to take no more than 30 minutesto (a) listen to the presentation on the assigned topic, (b)pose clarifying questions, (c) discuss similarities anddifferences between the two communions on the assignedtopic, and (d) prepare a summary of their discussion forthe whole group to hear.

After the three sections have had opportunity tocomplete their tasks, reconvene the whole group and askeach section to report on its conversation.

Option 2Keeping the groups together, allow about 15-20

minutes for presentations and discussion on each topic.After each topic has been discussed, be sure to have thegroup note differences and similarities between the twocommunions.

CLOSING 5 minutes



MinistrySession Five


12/42

OBJECTIVE

By the end of this session, participants will have begunto brainstorm ideas about how the two congregationsmight live into full communion and enrich their livesand ministries in the community.

PREPARATIONS

By this time, we assume that participants have come toknow each other and their respective congregationsrelatively well and have, because of this knowledge anddeepening personal relationships, begun also to sensepossibilities for a future common life between thecongregations, a common life that takes seriously thenature and mission of each as well as common Christiancommitments in witness and service.

Prepare copies of the description of Interim EucharisticSharing found in Appendix H to give to participants.

Prepare copies of the Guidelines for Interim EucharisticSharing in Appendix H to prepare for the joint celebrationof the Eucharist in Session 7.

While our two communions are living in an in-betweenperiod of Interim Eucharistic Sharing, congregations canassist both dialogue participants and their respectivecommunions in exploring what a full communion

relationship might mean for congregations, the placeswhere we gather for worship, witness, and service in thename of our common Lord. So, plan for a future lifetogether!

In preparing for this session

Identify several spaces where working groups canmeet35 spaces should be adequate.

ACTIVITY A Worship 15 minutes


ACTIVITY B Common Mission 20 minutes

Circulate the Mission and Call resource found inAppendix G

Discuss each of the definitions of mission in Missionand Call. Ask participants which one resonates thestrongest with them.

ACTIVITY C Brainstorming 40 minutes

1. Divide participants into working groups of 35persons each, taking care to be sure each groupcontains representatives of each congregation. Askeach group to build a list of ideas for how the twocongregations togethermight live into fullcommunion, i.e., ideas about what the twocongregations might do to express the unityrecognized in full communion. Instruct the groupsto note their ideas on newsprint (see that each grouphas a supply of paper and markers), writing enoughabout each idea so that others can figure out whatthe idea means. Then, send the groups to separateworkspaces.

2. After the groups have had a chance to work, gathereveryone together in the common meeting place andcollect the sheets of newsprint. (You can post them

on the walls while groups are working on the nexttask.)

ACTIVITY D

Distribute the statement on Interim Eucharistic Sharingin Appendix H. Ask participants to prayerfully considerall the ideas the group has collected and the proposal forInterim Eucharistic Sharing for the next (and last) meeting

CLOSING 5 minutes



Planning for Common MissionSession Six


13/42

OBJECTIVES

By the end of this session, participants will have begunto plan for specific common actions expressing fullcommunion and will hold a joint celebration of theEucharist.

PREPARATIONS

This final session is made up of two parts. The firstpart gives participants a chance to take brainstormed ideasfrom the previous session and flesh them out so it will beeasier to implement them. In preparing for this session,

youll need just what you had last time.

The second is a joint celebration of the Eucharist.Clergy and lay leaders from both congregations should alsoplan a joint celebration of the Eucharist, using theguidelines attached in Appendix H. Be sure to be incontact with each respective bishop in advance of thissession, since these celebrations need to be approved by thebishops.

Most likely only those who have been a part of thestudy series will in attendance for the planning session.However, be sure to extend an invitation to all members ofboth churches to attend the joint celebration of theEucharist.

Before this session, carefully review the newsprint fromlast session. On new sheets of paper, carefully copy thoseitems which got the most votes (i.e., check marks); theseitems will make up the action agenda for this session.Youll have to use your judgment about how many items toinclude on this agenda. Divide the list into two sections, sothat the group can address half the items at a time.

Post the newsprint from the last session around theroom.

ACTIVITY A Welcome 5 minutes

Welcome the participants, and explain that there willnot be the usual opening worship because of the jointcelebration of the Eucharist at the end of the session.

ACTIVITY B Planning for Action 30 minutes

Tell participants that theyll have a chance to be a partof two separate committees. Each committee will meet for30 minutes and will take one of the items from the actionagenda and do some what, by whom, and by whenplanning for implementing the item. Then, inviteparticipants to sign up quickly to work on one item from

each section of the action agenda. Direct each group to aworkspace and encourage them to work quickly.

Invite everyone back to the common space and askeach working group to briefly summarize its planning.

ACTIVITY C Evaluating the process 15 minutes

Take the last fifteen minutes of this session, divide intocongregational groups, and briefly give participants anopportunity to suggest comments for the evaluation andplanning response form.

WORSHIP

Thank participants for their energy and creativity.Have someone explain what Interim Eucharistic sharing is,using the Resource in Appendix G. Explain what fullcommunion is using the resource in Appendix H. Closewith a brief prayer, then invite the people to move into thesanctuary.


Celebration of the Eucharist and Next StepsSession Seven


14/42

Return this completed form to The United MethodistEpiscopal Dialogue Team,c/o The Office of Ecumenical and Interfaith Relations, 815 Second Avenue, New

York, NY 10017. Thank you for your participation.

Congregation_______________________________________________________

Address___________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

Person(s) submitting this response:______________________________________

1. Significant things we learned about the other communion during this study are:

2. Significant things we learned about ourselves as a communion or as a

congregation during this study are:

3. Creative ideas for how we might live into full communion, should it beestablished, in our community are:

4. Comments wed like to share about the discussion process:


Evaluation and Planning Response Form


15/42

In Advent 1999 a group of Methodists and Anglicans,mostly in the United States, agreed to pray together forAnglican-Methodist unity through the liturgical year

that began in Advent 1999. Their prayers reflect the deeplonging of many Anglicans and Methodists that ourchurches somehow find a way to stronger, more visibleunity in Christ. Their prayers could be summarized in thepetition that serves as the title of this study guide: Makeus one.

The Episcopal-United Methodist dialogue has set full

communion as the goal for our two churches. In this case,full communion is understood as a relationship betweentwo distinct churches or communions in which eachmaintains its own autonomy while recognizing thecatholicity and apostolicity of the other, and believing theother to hold the essentials of the Christian faith. In such arelationship, communicant members of each church wouldbe able freely to communicate at the altar of the other, andordained ministers may officiate sacramentally in eitherchurch. Specifically, in our context, we understand this toinclude transferability of members; mutual recognition andinterchangeability of ministries; freedom to use each others

liturgies; freedom to participate in each others ordinationsand installations of clergy, including bishops; andstructures for consultation to express, strengthen, andenable our common life, witness, and service, to the gloryof God and the salvation of the world.

Methodists and Episcopalians have much in commonfrom our roots in the Church of England and in how ourtraditions went through a process of adaptation to theAmerican colonies. This is particularly the case in the post-Revolutionary period, which was an extraordinarilyformative period for both of our traditions. Despite manycommonalties, Methodists and Episcopalians have rarelybeen in one-on-one, bilateral dialogue with one another inthe United States. Initial attempts in the 1930s werepostponed from the Methodist side to focus on thereunion of the Methodist Episcopal Churchs Northernand Southern branches, which was accomplished in 1939.Following the Second World War, and building onArchbishop Geoffrey Fishers call in his famous CambridgeSermon for renewed dialogue between Anglicans and other

churches, the Methodist Church and the Episcopal Churchengaged in dialogue from 1948-1961. These conversations,however, were ended in favor of both churchesparticipation in the multi-church Consultation on ChurchUnion. In 1968 the Methodist Church merged with theEvangelical United Brethren Church to form the UnitedMethodist Church. From 1964-2002, the Methodist and,later, The United Methodist Church, dialogued with theEpiscopal Church within the context of the Consultationon Church Union.

Meanwhile, Anglicans and Methodists in Great Britainand Ireland engaged in several different rounds of bilateraldialogue for the last fifty years. An initial proposal forreunion in England was approved by the MethodistConference in 1972 but failed to achieve the necessary75% threshold in the General Synod of the Church ofEngland. In 1982, a Covenanting for Unity proposalwhich included Methodist, Moravians and the Reformedchurches in Great Britain again failed to receive therequired 75% in General Synod. In 1994, the MethodistChurch approached the Church of England to engage inpreliminary talks. These talks eventually lead to both

churches embarking on formal conversations in 1996,setting as their goal the visible unity of the church. Theseconversations have continued, and issued the seminalAnglican-Methodist Covenant in 2001. In 2002, thisCovenant was signed by the British Methodist Church andthe Church of England, committing the churches to a ten-year process of covenant relationship marked by increasingcooperation in mission, witness, and education.

Similar advances have been made on the internationallevel. Responding to an initiative from the 1988 LambethConference, the Anglican Communion and the WorldMethodist Council engaged in a communion-wide

dialogue from 1993-1996. It issued its final report, Sharingthe Apostolic Communion, which detailed the substantialtheological convergence reached between Anglicans andMethodists. On the basis of such convergence, the 1998Lambeth Conference encouraged local provinces of theCommunion to engage in dialogues with MethodistChurches (Resolution IV.17, 1998 Lambeth Conference).


Historical Summary of Anglicanand Methodist Dialogue

Appendix A


16/42

Building on the momentum from the Internationaldialogue and the Anglican-Methodist Conversations inEngland, and from an important and very productive localEpiscopal-United Methodist dialogue in North Carolina,The United Methodist Church, authorized by its 2000General Conference, and the Episcopal Church, authorizedby the 2000 General Convention, met for its first bilateraldialogue in 2002. The period from 2002-2006 marked the

initial stage of the dialogue, and has focused on two goals.The first was an examination of one anothers polities,ecclesiologies, and shared history. Papers by Dr. R. BruceMullin, the Rev. Dr. Ephraim Radner, and the Rev. Dr.Russell Richey formally addressed these issues,supplemented by presentations provided by the Rev. BettyGamble and Dr. Thomas Ferguson. The dialogue alsosought to identify convergence on matters of core doctrinefor both churches. Meetings in Minneapolis and New YorkCity addressed these questions. The Minneapolis dialoguemeeting in August of 2003 featured papers by Dr. MarionGrau, the Very Rev. Bill Petersen, and the Rev. Dr. Ted

Campbell, which attempted to describe the doctrinal ethosand standards of Anglicans and Methodists. The Dallasmeeting of January 2004 focused on this question, withpapers presented by the Rev. Canon J. Robert Wright andBishop William Oden on the historic episcopate, and bythe Very Rev. Titus Presler and Dr. Billy Abraham onmission. The September 2004 dialogue meeting in NewYork City focused more specifically on two very importantUnited Methodist theological statements, By Water and theSpirit, about Baptism, and This Holy Mystery, about theLords Supper or Holy Communion. The Rev. Dr. GayleFenton, who served on the study and drafting committeesfor these documents, presented them from The UnitedMethodist Church, and the Rev. Dr. Ruth Meyers and theRt. Rev. Neil Alexander provided responses from theEpiscopal Church.

While focusing on matters of core doctrine, the twochurches also began to discuss the one issue upon whichconvergence was unlikely to be reached during the initialphase of dialogue: that of the ordained ministry, inparticular the historic episcopate. The two churches choseto begin discussion on the ordained ministry by looking athow both churches have maintained faithfulness to the

apostolic faith through mission and through theepiscopate.The two churches have also sought practical ways to

find areas of cooperation in witness and mission. Fifteenbishops from each church met in Chicago, Illinois, in2005 to discuss how our two churches face similarchallenges. It is hoped that this initial consultation maylead to future joint meeting of the House of Bishops of theEpiscopal Church and the Council of Bishops of The

United Methodist Church. The January 2006 meeting ofthe dialogue met with members of the local NorthCarolina United Methodist-Episcopal dialogue (which hasbeen meeting since 1992) to share the learnings of thatproductive dialogue. Further, the September 2006 meetinghas invited leadership and members from a jointMethodist-Episcopal congregation to attend in order to seehow joint mission can happen on a local level. A

statement summarizing the historical and theological workof the dialogue, Make Us One, was published in 2007.Many of the resource documents in these appendices aredrawn from Make Us One.

After four years of dialogue, and with nearly forty yearsof discussion in the Consultation on Church Union, TheUnited Methodist Church and the Episcopal Church feelthat they can endorse without hesitation that bothchurches have maintained the apostolic faith and aremembers of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.On the basis of this substantial theological agreement, theEpiscopal Church is submitting a resolution authorizing

Interim Eucharistic Sharing with The United MethodistChurch to its 2006 General Convention. The UnitedMethodist Council of Bishops, which has the authority toauthorize Eucharistic sharing, has already passed a similarresolution. With the inauguration of Interim EucharisticSharing, it is hoped that this will begin to bring parishestogether in joint worship, mission, witness, and study. InInterim Eucharistic Sharing, the two churches recognizeone another as members of the only, holy, Catholic, andapostolic church, and authorize joint celebrations of theEucharist as a way to live into a deeper relationship for thesake of mission and witness. Having reached agreement inmatters of essential doctrine, the second round of dialoguebetween The United Methodist Church and the EpiscopalChurch, commencing in 2006, will focus on the remainingmatter upon which the two churches have been unable toreach complete agreement: that of the historic episcopate, afully interchangeable ordained ministry, and commonlyagreed upon Eucharistic elements.

We give thanks to God, whose Spirit has movedthrough our conversations and brought us thus far in ourdiscussions. With thanksgiving we offer this study guide tothe bishops, clergy, and deputies of the General

Convention to assist in their deliberations at the 2006General Convention. We also commend this study guideto the clergy and congregations of both our churches todeepen the relationship between our two churches and tofoster better understanding for the sake of mission in localcommunities.

As we look forward to the continued work of thisdialogue, we give thanks for the progress made and ask forGods guidance in addressing matters which need further



17/42

discussion. As we do we are reminded of the words of theApostle Paul and take heart: Glory to God, whose powerworking in us can do infinitely more than we can ask or

EPISCOPAL CHURCHThe Rt. Rev. Philip Duncan 2007-The Very Rev. David Bird, 2002-The Rev. Lois Boxill, 2002- 2006The Rev. Theodora Brooks, 2002-

Ms. Jan Farmer, 2004-The Rt. Rev. John Lipscomb, 2002-2003Deacon Sunny Lopez, 2004-2006Dr. Bruce Mullin, 2002-Dr. Patricia Page, 2002-Dr. Ephraim Radner, 2002-2003Rev. Dr. Paula Barker, 2007-Dr. Thomas Ferguson, Staff

imagine. Glory to God from generation to generation inthe Church, and in Christ Jesus for ever and ever(Ephesians 3:20-21).

UNITED METHODIST CHURCHBishop Gregory V. Palmer, 2007-The Rev. Dr. Ted A. Campbell, 2006-The Rev. Trey Hall, 2002-2006

The Rev. Erica R. Jenkins, 2002-The Rev. Dr. Diedra Kriewald, 2002-The Rev. Dr. Russell E. Richey, 2002-The Rev. Jeannie Trevio-Teddlie, 2002-The Rev. Elizabeth Gamble, Staff, 2002-2005The Rev. Dr. Douglas Mills, Staff


Members of the DialogueThe Rt. Rev. Franklin Brookhart, Co-Chair Bishop William B. Oden, Co-Chair


18/42

A COMMON BACKGROUND

The United Methodist Church and the EpiscopalChurch are both descendants of the Church of England,and both adapted this common background in differentways. This resource examines those common backgrounds,looks at how the two traditions diverged, and notes a fewconvergences between Methodists and Episcopalians.

Some aspects of this common heritage are:

A grounding in eighteenth century questions ofreligious revival and identity:

Methodism emerged in the colonies presentingitself, as it did in Britain, as a reform movementwith Anglicanism. Methodism found a place withlay persons and clergy who shared Wesleyanismsaspiration for a religion that moved your heart, notonly your mind, and holy living, shaping youractions to match your faith. Both churches emergedafter the American Revolution in crisis, seekingindependence from foreign authority and thrustinto profound self-examination and a struggle forsurvival.N

Appreciation for the threefold ministryof thechurch.

Both Anglicans and Methodists retained athreefold understanding of the ministry ofbishops, presbyters, and deacons. The nameschosen for the new ecclesial expressions theProtestant Episcopal Church and the MethodistEpiscopal Church (the name of the mainMethodist church body until 1939) reflect thecentrality of the episcopate to the two churchesself-understanding. Likewise there was a common

emphasis on adapting the episcopacy to meet theneed of mission.

N This perspective offers parallels between how thetwo churches developed. William White was aprominent Anglican and one of the firstconsecrated as bishop for the new church. In hispamphlet,A Case for the Episcopal Churches,Considered, he argued for a different kind of

episcopate than in the Church of England: he

spoke of the restoration of an apostolicepiscopacy, where bishops would be pastors,teachers, and leaders, not prelates. Likewise, inJohn Wesleys ordination of superintendents forthe American Methodist societies, and in theimplementation of episcopacy in the MethodistEpiscopal Church, the goal was for therestoration of apostolic models of episcopacy tosuit the needs of the new American society. Bothchurches retained the threefold office of deacon,elder/presbyter, and bishop, though adapted indifferent ways.

N Shaped by the Book of Common Prayer (BCP).

Wesley himself had a high understanding of thesacraments, and advocated frequent reception ofHoly Communion. Accordingly he adapted theBCP for the Methodists, titled The SundayService of the Methodists in North America. Thisbook provided a full set of ritualsmorningprayer, evening prayer, weekday litany, Sundayservice, Eucharist; two baptismal rites; orders formarriage, communion of the sick, and burial;and ordination services for deacons, elders andsuperintendents. It also included a brieflectionary and twenty-four Articles of Religion,excerpted from Anglicanisms Thirty-Nine.

The founders of the Protestant EpiscopalChurch likewise expressed their strong intent tokeep intact the wise and liberal part of thesystem of the Church of England anddeveloped a Book of Common Prayer similar(but by no means identical) to that of the

Church of England. The Prayer Book whichwas adopted by the Protestant Episcopal Churchwas deemed acceptable by the English bishops,and, though formal adherence was not required,the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion were addedto the Book of Common Prayerin 1801.


A Shared HeritageAppendix B


19/42

N Church-state relationships

Methodists and Episcopalians were bothdescendants of a legally established state church,the Church of England. While separation ofchurch and state was the norm in the new UnitedStates, certainly aspects of being a state religioncarried over for both Episcopalians and

Methodists. Both have seen their churches as notends to themselves, but for service to the largernation. Methodists quickly undertook missionsthat tracked settlement west and later foundedschools, hospitals, and universities on a largerscale than Episcopalians, establishing a largeinfrastructure, so to speak. Methodists alsosought a greater role in shaping the morals andreligiosity of society and were active in what wewould now call social justice movements.

Episcopalians were less likely to get involved in

many of the movements that Methodists did(such as temperance) and founded fewerinstitutions on the other hand, they came toplay a larger role in political, legal, financial, andjudicial leadership. To give but one example, thepercentage of Episcopalians elected to thePresidency, the Senate, and Congress far exceedsthe overall percentage of the population.

N English traditions ofhymnody, including that ofCharles Wesley.

Both churches were shaped by the explosion inhymn-writing that was a byproduct of theMethodist renewal movement. The hymns ofCharles Wesley in particular have had a formativerole in shaping the popular piety in bothchurches.

N Continued links to the British churches.

Even after formal separation from their Englishfounders, the Methodist Churches and the

Episcopal Church both continued to remain incontact with the British Methodist Churches andthe Church of England. Later, both churcheswould form more formal relationships whichwould lead to an understanding of Anglicanismand Methodism taking shape as globalcommunions, the Anglican Communion and theWorld Methodist Council.

CRISIS: ONE CHURCH BECOMES TWO

One should not underestimate the grave situations whichboth churches faced after the American Revolution.NAnglicans and Methodists needed to address

questions ofidentity: what did it mean to be aMethodist or an Anglican in a newlyindependent nation and apart from the formal

structures of the Church of England or of JohnWesley and the Methodist conference?

N Both churches were also suspect because of theirties with England. A significant number ofAnglican clergy and lay people fled the coloniesbecause of their loyalty to the Crown, as didmost of the preachers whom Wesley had sent tothe colonies. Wesley himself had criticized theRevolution.

N In addition, Anglicans and Methodists were verymuch in the minority: they had to shape theiridentities against the backdrop of a religiouslandscape dominated by Calvinist theology andthe Presbyterian, Congregationalist, and Baptistdenominations.

In the crucial decade of the 1780s, decisions were madewhich set into motion important trajectories whichwould lead to increasing distance between Anglicans andMethodists. Neither of these trajectories is meant tooversimplify the complex realities of the time, but aredesigned as ways to look at how the choices the two

churches made set into motion different developments.

The Episcopal Trajectory

Episcopalians emphasized order: at their foundingconventions in the 1780s, they drafted aConstitution and Canons and a Book of CommonPrayer.

Episcopalians emphasized continuity: they madechanges to the Book of Common Prayer and theConstitution and Canons in order to preserve arelationship with the Church of England. This inturn eventually convinced English bishops toconsecrate Americans to the episcopacy.

The Methodist Trajectory

Methodists emphasized mission: they quickly set upa system of church organization the circuit riders,for example that allowed for the church to expandat a phenomenal pace, becoming the largest



20/42

denomination in the United States by 1860.Methodists emphasized preaching: Wesleys Orderfor Sunday service fell into disuse as Methodismbecame more influenced by the revival practices onthe frontier and gave a larger prominence to hearingand preaching the Word.Methodists experienced isolation from John Wesley,who disapproved of some of these choices, and from

British Methodists.

DEVELOPMENT OF TWO TRADITIONSThus a variety of expressions of colonial Anglicanism

coalesced into two organizations in the post-Revolutionaryperiod: The Protestant Episcopal Church and theMethodist Episcopal Church. As a result of decisions madein these foundational years, each church began to developits own charisms or distinctive gifts.

Methodist Charisms

Many distinctive points of Methodist church lifedeveloped in the early American period. Some of thesedistinctive points may be summarized as follows.N The Methodist Episcopal Church quickly

adopted revivalist practices and pioneered thecamp meeting on the new American frontier.

N It functioned with a missional understanding ofthe church and its purposes, the church as anevangelistic movement, down to its organizationinto conference and circuits.

NWesleyan language, norms, structures, offices anddoctrines were fit into an episcopal framework

(although not all Methodists churches haveadopted episcopacy).

N Methodism accommodated various democratic,reformist and populist impulses, including anti-slavery and openness to womens leadership roles.

N It emphasized preaching as central, leading to thecelebration of Communion less frequently thanweekly.

NAdopting a connectional, itinerant and missionalrather than parish/diocesan understanding of theepiscopacy, Methodism described its bishops asitinerant, general superintendents.

N It sustained Wesleys effective use of discipline,practices of piety and small groups (classmeeting) as well as camp meetings.

N Methodist churches developed considerablestrength within African American communitiesin the early American period, with blackconstituents and clergy in the MethodistEpiscopal Church and in separate African-

American Methodist denominations which alsoemerged in this era (the African MethodistEpiscopal and African Methodist Episcopal ZionChurches).

Episcopal CharismsDuring the nineteenth century the Episcopal Church

developed along several broad fronts.

N The first was a revival of the catholicunderstanding of Anglicanism. This in parthighlighted and revived the sacramental nature ofthe church. New forms of spirituality becamepopular, including a revival of religious orders formen and women.

NA second was the development of a broaderunderstanding of Anglicanism. By the seconddecade of the nineteenth century three distinctparties or wings developed:

a high churchparty emphasizing the churchscatholic heritage, with an emphasis on the

sacramentsa low churchparty emphasizing the churchsevangelical heritage, including the place ofindividual conversion, anda broad church partyemphasizing the churchsopenness to modern intellectual and socialtrends.

The presence of these three viewpoints forced theEpiscopal Church to see itself in inclusive terms. As aresult the role of the liturgy became elevated as that whichdefined the church and held it together (this principle isoften summarized in the expression lex orandi, lex credendi,the rule of prayer is the rule of belief, or, more simply,prayer shapes belief).

A NEW MILIEU

Understanding the significance of the post-Revolutionary period is important in understanding thecommon heritage of both churches as well as how the twotraditions separated. However, by the early twentiethcentury a number of factors began to emerge that calledboth churches to reassess some of its nineteenth centurydevelopments.N The first was theglobal expansion of

Christianityas a result of the great missionaryoutreach of the nineteenth century. From a globalperspective many of the divisions of WesternChristendom looked much smaller. By thebeginning of the 20th century the vision ofChristian unity attracted many. ProminentEpiscopalians (such as Charles Brent, missionary



21/42

bishop to the Philippines) and Methodists (JohnR. Mott, a Methodist layman who had beenactive in YMCA work) became leaders in thisenterprise.

N Connected with this were new movements inscholarship. Fresh examinations of thought andpractice of the early church began to suggest thatthe ancient tradition was different from the later

developments in theology, liturgy, andecclesiology. This allowed for a new basis forconsensus.

N By the second half of the nineteenth centurythere was aperceived crisisin both WesternChristendom and in America. As Europe beganto move away from its historic Christian identitybaptized people sensed they were in the sameboat, and needed to stand together to holdcertain values and beliefs. In America the oldProtestant establishment centering upon thehistoric Anglo churches (which both Methodists

and Episcopalians in their own ways had laboredto defend) began to give way. This freed thechurches to see themselves in a more ecclesialway.

The way the two churches responded to thechanging world has allowed for movements ofconvergence, as opposed to the original trajectories ofseparation.

Methodist Convergences with the New MilieuN Methodists began a gradual balancing of revivalist

and conversionist emphases throughcommunication and education. They establishednational modes of communication (MethodistMagazine, the Christian Advocate) and numerouscolleges and seminaries, especially from themiddle of the nineteenth century onwards.

N Methodists supplemented their structures ofConferences and emphasis on connection bycreating central structures for programsboardsand agencies.

N Methodists actively participated in social reformsin the late nineteenth century and in the Social

Gospel movement from the early twentiethcentury, cooperating in this movement withEpiscopalians and others.

NAlert to liturgical developments in theAnglican/Episcopal church, Methodists began tostudy and reflect these developments in their ownworship practices and publications, leading to thegradual re-appreciation of what had been Wesleys

appreciation of the Christian year, the lectionary,sacramental sensibilities, and even liturgicalvestments. This can be seen in a succession ofMethodist books of worship.

N There has been increased Methodist attention tothe teaching and sacramental responsibilities ofthe clergy office, particularly as exercised andmodeled by the bishops.

N Methodists also have been noted for activeparticipation in the ecumenical movement. Suchan image represents the importance of themission field in motivating ecumenical spirit for

Methodists.

Episcopal Convergences with New MilieuN New scholarship in history and liturgy began to

weaken party divisions within the EpiscopalChurch. From this new perspective, catholicismand evangelicalism did not appear to be mutuallyexclusive. Likewise new scholarship offered freshways of approaching some of the old issues, suchas episcopacy and apostolic succession.

NAn ecumenical vision dictated that a dividedchurch is not acceptable and the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral (formulated by Anglicansin the late nineteenth century) expressedAnglican understanding of criteria for futurechurch unions.

N There was a fresh look at traditional theologicaland ecclesial divisions.

Episcopalians likewise have come to understand theimportance of the global as well as domestic mission fieldin motivating ecumenical spirit.



22/42

Introduction

In addition to common origins in the early Americanperiod, United Methodists and Episcopalians also share asignificant degree of agreement in theological areas. Thissection summarizes that agreement. It also notes severalissues the dialogue team has identified as being ofparticular importance: theology of baptism, understandingof the Eucharist, and the issue of human sexuality.

Theological Convergence: SourcesThis theological convergence has been expressed in a

wide range of formulations.The Episcopal Church summarized the basis of

theological agreement for ecumenical relations in theChicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral. These four points of theQuadrilateral are:N the Old and New Testament as containing all

things necessary for salvationN the Apostles and Nicene Creeds as sufficient

summaries of the Christian faithN the two gospel sacraments, andN the historic episcopate, locally adapted.The Episcopal Church and The United Methodist

Church have been active in the Faith and OrderCommission of the World Council of Churches.

N both churches have endorsed and affirmed theimportant theological statement Baptism,Eucharist, and Ministryof the World Council ofChurches.

The Episcopal Church and The United MethodistChurch were represented in the international theologicaldialogue sponsored by our two world communions.N This dialogue produced the 1996 statement

Sharing in the Apostolic Communion, which is animportant summary of theological agreementbetween Methodists and Anglicans.

Furthermore, important discussions have been takingplace between our sister churches in the United Kingdom,the Church of England the British Methodist Church.N The British Methodist Church and the Church

of England have declared that no substantialtheological differences exist between Anglicansand Methodists

A Shared Faith

Both United Methodists and EpiscopaliansN proclaim Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior;N claim scripture as containing all things necessary

for salvation, and as the primary rule for the lifeof the church;

N affirm and use the Nicene and Apostles Creedsas sufficient summaries of the Christian faith;

N understand the sacrament of holy baptism as ameans of divine grace that initiates one into thelife of Christ in the Church;

N understand the sacrament of the Eucharist as ameans of divine grace that sustains and deepens

our faith;N continue to worship in ways that reflect our

common liturgical and sacramental roots.

A Lived FaithBoth churches affirm:N the gifts and ministries of all persons, laity and

clergy, women and men;N the need for prayer and holiness of heart and life

as ways of growth in the Christian faith;N the pursuit of social action and justice as inherent

practices of Christian discipleship;

N the unity of the church as the will of Christ forthe sake of mission, service, and evangelism;

N the role of bishops as leaders of the life of thechurch, and as guiding and maintaining theapostolic faith and work.

Holy BaptismBoth of our churches affirm baptism as a sacrament

and have affirmed the definition of sacraments used by thebroader Christian church as outward and visible signs ofinward and spiritual grace;N our churches affirm together that all ministries of

the church, lay and ordained, are grounded inbaptism.

N our churches affirm that baptism is a grace andgift received by faith;

Nwe affirm that baptism and the covenantalrelationship established through it is the doorwayto the life of holiness;

N both of our churches baptize infants as well asadults; and


The Faith We AffirmAppendix C


23/42

Nwe affirm that holy baptism initiates women andmen into the one, holy, catholic, and apostolicchurch. Thus, in baptism we are already unitedin Christ.

NAn area ofnon-convergence is that the UnitedMethodist Church has informally developed insome places open communion that on certainoccasions allows communion of unbaptized

persons.

Holy EucharistN Both churches affirm a complete pattern of

worship involving word and table;N Both churches urge regular participation in and

celebration of the Eucharist;N Both churches affirm that Christ is truly present

in the Eucharist, with a variety of emphases onthe manner of Christs presence; and

N Both churches understand that faithfulparticipation in the Eucharist nurtures and

sustains the life of the community and of theindividual baptized person;

NAn area ofnon-convergence is that TheEpiscopal Church uses traditional wine, whereasUnited Methodist Church congregationstraditionally use unfermented communion winein the Eucharist.

Human SexualityIn their official statements, both churches affirm the

sanctity of marriage and the family, as well as chastity insingleness. Both churches affirm that all persons have

dignity and sacred worth, and therefore are deserving ofthe acceptance and pastoral care of the church as well ascommon human rights and civil liberties. Nonetheless,issues of sexuality have become increasingly complex in thecurrent period in both of our churches.

We trust the guidance of the Holy Spirit to lead us inthese areas. We agree that we do not find this to be animpediment towards full communion. While there may bedifferences within and between our denominations,standards and qualifications for ordination are matters ofinternal polity of each church. Exchange of clergy in anypossible full communion agreement is always by invitation,and we envision that in any future agreement for fullcommunion, each church will continue to order itsministry as it sees fit.

Questions for Reflection and Discussion

1. In what ways can you perceive both the EpiscopalChurch and The United Methodist Church asproclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ? Are we inagreement on the most central Christian teachings?

2. How do differences in teachings and practices related

to baptism affect the life of church members in ourdenominations? What do we believe that God doesin baptism, and how is this reflected in our practicesof baptism?

3. What would a Methodist attending an Episcopalservice of Holy Communion find to be differentabout the service and about the manner in which itis celebrated? What would an Episcopalian find to bedifferent about a United Methodist service of HolyCommunion? In what ways do you discern orunderstand the presence of Christ in the sacrament?

How significant are these differences in practices orbeliefs for our churches to have full communionwith each other?

4. Why might issues related to human sexuality be seenas an impediment to communion between ourchurches today?



24/42

AN OUTLINE OF THE POLITY OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH

IntroductionOne of the first elements to keep in mind in examining

the development of the Episcopal Church is that theformation of the Anglican Communion was notsystematically laid out. Anglicanism was formulated anddeveloped in an English setting as an established church.Bishops exercised temporal as well as spiritual authority,and each citizen of England was considered a member ofthe Church of England. These and many other aspectsunderwent fundamental changes as Anglicanism wasexported. While there were missionary impulses in thecenturies following the Reformation, no one in 1600would have envisioned Anglicanism becoming a globalcommunion of 38 independent provinces. Thus eachexpression of Anglicanism outside of Englandaccommodated and adapted to the local circumstances,from the non-juring Scottish Church (which refused toswear allegiance to William and Mary after James IIsabdication) down to the present day.

The Episcopal Church in the United States of Americais an excellent example of Anglicanism adapted to localcircumstances. Almost obliterated by the American

Revolution, within fifty years of 1783 Treaty of Paris TheEpiscopal Church had secured an episcopate, a prayerbook, a host of voluntary societies, and several seminaries.Meeting in Philadelphia in 1789, the disparate strands ofAnglicanism in the former colonies met to draft aconstitution. The essential structure and governingprinciples remain unchanged.

The General ConventionThe Episcopal Church is envisioned as a federation of

dioceses. As such the diocese, in turn made up ofparishes, was seen as the essential unit of the church.

Ultimate legislative authority is vested in the GeneralConvention, which meets once every three years. Initialplans for a unicameral body were scrapped in favor of aGeneral Convention comprised a House of Bishops and aHouse of Deputies (which was made up of clergy andlaity). Legislation can originate in either House but needsto be passed by both Houses.

In the House of Deputies, each diocese may berepresented by no more than four clergy and four lay

persons, elected by conventions held in each diocese. The

goal is equal representation in the House of Deputies,regardless of the size of the diocese.

In the House of Bishops, active and retired bishopshave voice and vote. However, on the votes which arerequired to confirm the election of bishops, only bishopswith jurisdiction (diocesan bishops) may vote.

To enact legislation requires a majority of both houses;to change the Prayer Book or Constitution requireslegislation to pass two successive Conventions; and forsignificant legislation avote by orders in the House ofDeputies is required. Rather than individual delegates, ina vote by orders each diocese casts one vote. To determine

this vote, each diocesan delegation is divided into clergyand laity. Each delegation deliberates and casts their votesindividually within their delegation. If a majority of bothclergy and laity assent, a single yes vote for the diocese iscast; if a majority of both do not assent, a single no voteis cast; should clergy and laity vote differently, a singlesplit delegation vote is cast. The key aspect of voting byorders is that split delegations count towards the needfor a majority. In effect, split delegations count as a novote. Thus there is a system of checks and balances withinthe Episcopal Churchs polity, and because of this polity it

is difficult to effect change quickly.

National and international organizationsAs time passed and the church grew, the need for

additional instruments for governance became clear. TheGeneral Convention of 1919 was instrumental in adaptingthe governing structures of the Episcopal Church. ThePresiding Bishops office became an elected one; previouslythe Presiding Bishop had been the senior bishop in theHouse of Bishops. It was only in 1943 that the PresidingBishop was required to resign his see. At the 1919Convention a National Council was established, with

administrative heads charged with specific program areas ofthe church. In addition, General Convention hasestablished a variety of Standing Commissions chargedwith various aspects of the churchs ministry: EcumenicalRelations, Mission, etc. General Convention laterestablished an Executive Council, vested with legislativeauthority between meetings of General Convention.

In addition, the Episcopal Church is part of theAnglican Communion. The relationship between the


Polity of The Episcopal ChurchAppendix D.1.


25/42

national church and the diocese is mirrored in therelationship between the Episcopal Church and theAnglican Communion. The Communion is a globalfederation of self-governing expressions of Anglicanism.These churches of the Communion are in full communionwith the see of Canterbury and united by a commonhistorical, liturgical, theological, ecclesiological heritagederived from the Church of England but significantly

adapted to local concerns. Much as with the EpiscopalChurch, over time this loose federation realized the need toestablished organs to promote unity and clarify variousissues. The Lambeth Conference of Bishops first met in1867, and has grown immensely over the years. In in thelast century theArchbishop of Canterbury, originallyprimate of all England, has taken on an increasing role inthe Anglican Communion as a symbol of unity. TheAnglican Consultative Councilwas established by the1968 Lambeth Conference to provide for greater dialogueand discussion between Lambeth Conferences. Inaddition, since 1979 the Primates Meetings of the headsof the member churches have met to discuss various issues.In recent years these meetings have become annual ones.These four entities in bold face type are sometimes calledinstruments of unity in Anglicanism.

The Local Church: Diocese and ParishThe Episcopal Church is a federation of dioceses,

which are understood as the central unit of the church.Dioceses can organize themselves and pass canonsgoverning their lives so long as they do not contradict thenational canons or constitution of the Episcopal Church

kind of an ecclesial version of the 10th

Amendment of the

US Constitution. Dioceses are governed by diocesanconventions, which meet annually. Authority is exercisedthrough the Bishop and the Standing Committee, which iscomprised of clergy and laity elected by the diocese. Forexample, candidates for ordination must be approved byboth the Standing Committee and the Bishop. In theevent the death or resignation of a bishop, administrative(but not sacramental) authority passes to the Standing

Committee. Bishops are elected by the conventions ofdioceses. In turn, in another example of checks andbalances, episcopal elections must be confirmed by amajority of the House of Bishops and a majority ofdiocesan standing committees.

Diocese are in turn made up of parishes. Parishes mayset their own standards and by-laws as long as they do notcontradict diocesan or national canons. Parishes elect aRector, whose must in turn be confirmed by the bishop ofthe diocese. Priests may not serve in parishes of a diocesewithout a license to do so from the diocesan bishop.Parishes are governed by Vestries. A Vestry may not

dismiss a Rector without the Rectors consent; nor may aRector resign unless the resignation is accepted by theVestry. Candidates for ministry must be approved by theVestry of the parish. Mission churches are new churchstarts or small congregations requiring diocesan financialsupport. A mission is governed by a Bishops Committee(similar to a Vestry) and the priest in charge is called aVicar (one who stands in for the bishop and diocese in amission church).



26/42

AN OUTLINE OF THE POLITY OFTHE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH

IntroductionThe United Methodist Church (UMC) was formed in

1968 as a merger of the Methodist Church and theEvangelical United Brethren Church. Its polity reflectstraditions of American episcopal Methodism shared incommon with the African Methodist Episcopal (AME)Church, the African Methodist Episcopal Zion (AMEZion) Church, and the Christian Methodist Episcopal(CME) Church. The polity of the UMC was based on theAnglican polity that John Wesley knew as a priest of theChurch of England and was modified by the addition ofindependent structures (such as classes, bands, societies,and the conference of traveling preachers) that developedin the eighteenth-century Methodist movement.

The Book of Discipline and the ConstitutionThe primary document that specifies United Methodist

polity is the denominations Book of Discipline, which isrevised quadrennially at the churchs General Conference(see below). At the beginning of the Disciplineis aconstitutionwhich lays out the authorities and

responsibilities of church conferences (see below) andrestricts the General Conference from altering specificdoctrinal statements (the Articles of Religion, theConfession of Faith, and the General Rules) and fromaltering specific aspects of church life (right to a trialbefore removing church members or clergy, the institutionsof itinerant ministry and superintendency, and the use offunds from the publishing house to support retired clergy).The Disciplinelays out the structures of Methodistconferences and local congregations, describes proceduresfor authorization of lay preachers and for the ordination ofordained clergy (deacons or elders), lays out responsibilities

of general church agencies, describes provisions for judicialadministration through the denominationsJudicialCouncil (which is authorized to interpret the Discipline),and lays out procedures for trials by which clergy andchurch members may be removed.

United Methodist ConferencesThe United Methodist Church is governed by a series

of church assemblies or judicatory bodies referred to as

conferences (from John Wesleys assemblies of preacher to

confer together).The General Conference meets quadrennially

and is the highest decision-making body of thedenomination. Only the General Conference canspeak on behalf of the denomination, and it has theresponsibility of revising the denominationsDisciplineand adopting resolutions that enunciatepositions on behalf of the denomination.

Jurisdictional Conferences are assemblies inlarge regions of the US (there are five jurisdictions)which meet quadrennially to elect bishops and to

nominate representatives to general church boardsand commissions. Central Conferences are large-scale regional assemblies outside the United States.They function like jurisdictional conferences in theelection of bishops and the nomination ofrepresentatives to general church boards andagencies, but they have extensive authority to revisethe Discipline(and reprint it) to suit the needs oftheir regions.

Annual Conferences are regional assemblies thatwould answer to dioceses in Anglican polity. The

annual conference is defined by the Disciplineasthe basic unit of The United Methodist Church,and clergy hold their membership in the annualconference rather than in a local congregation.Annual conferences are composed of all ordainedclergy in the conference and an equal number of laydelegates. They deal with issues of the ministerialstanding of ordained clergy and issues relevant tothe churchs ministries in their own areas and theyelect delegates to general and jurisdictional (andcentral) conferences. Meetings of annual conferencesalso involve worship and sometimes trainingactivities. An episcopal areais defined as the areain which a bishop presides and in most cases this iscoterminous with a single annual conference.However, in some cases a bishop will preside overtwo annual conferences grouped together in anepiscopal area. Annual conferences are divided intosmaller districts, each presided over by a districtsuperintendent.


Polity of The United Methodist ChurchAppendix D.2


27/42

Local CongregationsA local congregation is governed by a church council

(which would answer to the vestry in Episcopal polity andto the local session in Presbyterian polity), whose work isto oversee the ministries of the congregation. The churchcouncil may develop smaller committees, task forces, orwork areas to address specific areas of ministry. Alay

leader is designated annually as the lay representative forthe congregation. The congregation designates trusteesannually who have responsibility for church property.United Methodist congregations hold their property intrust from the annual conference, and a congregation isnot allowed to leave the denomination and retain itsproperty. The congregation holds annually either a chargeconference (consisting of church council members andother officials) or a church conference (in which allprofessed church members can participate), presided overby the district superintendent.

Bishops and the Council of BishopsUnited Methodist bishops are consecrated to exercise

superintendency (oversight) over the church in theirepiscopal areas. They represent the continuity of teachingin the church, and perform ordinations of deacons andelders. The bishops of the denomination meet together asthe Council of Bishops and are authorized to speak andnegotiate on behalf of the denomination on specificmatters defined by the Discipline. They act together to giveexecutive leadership for the denomination between generalconferences.

General Church Boards and AgenciesThe UMC has a number of general (denominational)

boards and commissions composed of lay and clergyrepresentatives and agencieswith full-time professionalstaff designated to address specific areas of the

denominations ministries. The Connectional Table(established in 2004) serves to coordinate ministries inthese boards and agencies. The general boards andcommissions are as follows: the General Board ofChurchand Society, the General Board ofDiscipleship, theGeneral Board ofGlobal Ministries, the General Board ofHigher Education and Ministry, the GeneralCommission on Christian Unity and Interreligious

Concerns, the General Commission on Religion andRace, the General Commission on the Status and Role ofWomen, and the General Commission on UnitedMethodist Men. The denominations General Council onFinance and Administration oversees the financialadministration of the denomination, and the UnitedMethodist Publishing House, the General Commissionon Communications, the General Commission onArchives and History, and the General Board ofPensionand Health Benefits are service agencies of thedenomination.

Appointment of ClergyA distinctive feature of the polity of American episcopal

Methodist churches (UMC, AME, AME Zion, and CME)is that clergy are appointed by bishops in consultation withdistrict superintendents (in AME, AME Zion, and CMEchurches, these are referred to as presiding elders). In theUMC, the bishop and his or her cabinet ofsuperintendents are required to consult with acongregations pastor-parish relations committee (orstaff-parish relations committee in larger congregations)and with clergy themselves in matters of clergy

appointments. This distinctive mode of clergyappointment is referred to historically as itinerancy(oritinerant ministry) and is an aspect of United Methodistlife protected by the constitution of the denomination.



28/42

The Episcopal Church and The United Methodist

Church each have formed a unique and distinctive spirit, away of being church. Our individual denominationsexhibit a particular tone, an underlying sentiment ofthought and practice that is immediately recognizable bythe members of each communion. This combination ofideas, customs, interests, and skills is called its ethosthat is, its own particular church culture. Our commonancestry, our denominational history in the United States,the differing congregational ambiance found in differentregions of the country, and the reception of ecumenicalwork in this century have produced distinctive churchcultures.

StereotypesMembers of each church readily recognizes the

denominational stereotypes that have produced laughterfrom places like the New Yorkermagazine cartoons to theomnipresent, who gets to heaven and how manyEpiscopalians/Methodists does it take to change a lightbulb jokes that illustrate many a sermon. If persons were

to say that they had attended worship at The Church of

the Covered Dish, United Methodists would immediatelyrecognize themselves in the place name. In fact, not allUnited Methodist churches have covered dish suppersanymore, but the covered dish experience is in theirhistorical memory bank. Covered dish suppers remindUnited Methodists of their small town and rural past whenneighbors shared garden produce and home-cookedculinary delights.

Most jokes are light-hearted and we enjoy puncturingour own ecclesial pretensions.

Can you think of some jokes that your church tells onitself?

1. Do you recognize your church ethos in these jokes?2. What zings home in the punch lines?3. What is left-out in the caricature?


Church Identity and CultureAppendix E


29/42

The following statistics are meant to provide anoverview, or a snapshot of the each denomination.

Statistics from the Fact Book and Index of Resources of TheUnited Methodist Church; Cokesbury Publishing 2004,Nashville, Tenn. 37203, and the 2006 Episcopal Church Annualand Office for Congregational Development of the EpiscopalChurch.

MEMBERSHIP

EPISCOPAL CHURCH

Total Membership: 2,284,233

Euro-American 89.1%African-American 2.5%Multi-Racial 7.0%Other 1.4%

Clergy 17,174Clergywomen 4,607

THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH

Total Membership: 8,255,207

Asian 73,558African American 423,456Hispanic-Latino 55,143Native American 21,765Pacific Islander 12,196

Clergy: 44,987Clergywomen: 7,706

ETHNIC CONGREGATIONS

THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH

Asian 75African American 230Hispanic Latino 238Native American n/a

THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH

Asian 371African American 2,439Hispanic Latino 313Native American 142Pacific Islander 43

INTERNATIONAL

The Episcopal ChurchThe Episcopal Church is an international church, with

over nine dioceses outside of the United States. Thelargest diocese of the Episcopal Church, in fact, is verylikely the Diocese of Haiti. Each of these dioceses sends

representatives to the General Convention of the EpiscopalChurch, and their bishops sit in the House of Bishops.

The United Methodist ChurchThere are 41,000 local United Methodist churches in

Africa, Europe, and the Philippines. These churches aredivided into 117 Annual Conferences. They electdelegates every four years to the General Conference ofThe United Methodist Church, held in The United States,which is the highest decision-making body of the church.

Members of both The United Methodist Church and the

Episcopal Church must be careful not to assume that there isonly one ethos within its denomination. Each ethnic group,no matter what its numerical size, has its own distinctivechurch culture. Every ethnic group contributes to the largerethos of the denomination. Nor is every ethnic groupmonolithic: within each of the categories listed here there arediversities of culture and identity

QUESTIONS FOR REFLECTION AND

DISCUSSIONStatistics can tell a story. The numbers make it clearthat both churches are heavily populated by Christians ofEuropean ancestry. Yet, each church has significant ethnicminority and interest groups. Do you know how minorityvoices are received in each church? Reflect on thefollowing questions:


BY THE NUMBERS: DEMOGRAPHICS TELL A STORY


30/42

1. What do the membership numbers tell us abouteach of our churches?

2. What might the racial-ethnic populations in ourchurches indicate about our church cultures?

What structures exist within each church to insure fullrights for minority voices?

3. Compare the number of women clergy in eachchurch. Are the numbers larger or smaller thanmale clergy? Do you think that women, lay orordained, hold the same number of high ranking

positions within the churches as male lay orordained members? What organizations advocatefor women in each of the churches?

4. Do you think it is possible for a denomination toreflect only one ethos? If so, how do the variousethnic and interest groups contribute to the culturethat reflects the denomination as a whole? If not,

how does your church deal with the underlyingtensions of diverse church cultures?



31/42

LOCATION OF EPISCOPAL CHURCH MEMBERSHIP

As the map indicates, Episcopalians are concentratedlargely on the East and West Coasts, and in theSoutheastern part of the country. Approximately1,458,000 Episcopalians live in dioceses along one of the

two Coasts, almost 65% of the total.

The Episcopal Church also has a number of smallercongregations: 78% of Episcopal Churches have fewer than200 members. However, unlike The United Methodist

Church, these smaller churches are not necessarily ruralones. The Episcopal Church is largely an urban orsuburban phenomenon: over 64% of Episcopal Churchesare located in cities

or suburbs, 30% in smaller towns, and 6% are classifiedas rural.

QUESTIONS FOR REFLECTION ANDDISCUSSION

1. Do the maps indicate that our respective churchesare basically rural, small town, urban or suburban?Can you think of how the location of personsattending our churches influences the generalculture of our national churches?

2. What does the regionalism of each church

contribute to the larger perspective of the thoughtand action of the national organization?

3.How does income and education affect the ethos of achurch?

4. Has the social class of each changed over the years ofliving in this country?



32/42


As the map shows, the largest percentage of UnitedMethodists, 2,934,012 of its members, are located in theSoutheastern part of the United States. Compare thisnumber with the 419,430 United Methodists located inthe Western Conferences. The Northeastern Conferenceshave a membership of 1,503,779, with 1,806,997 locatedin the South Central region.

There are over 8 million United Methodist membersspread throughout this country. One significant fact tonote is that 80% of these congregations have amembership under 200, and they are located in rural areasand small towns. However, the many United Methodistsare now located in larger churches in the suburbs. Thetrend in membership from rural and small town Americato urban ring churches is a major shift for a denominationthat began its life with clergy on horseback bringing theGospel to the new frontier of this country.

LOCATION OF THE UNITED METHODIST MEMBERSHIP


33/42

I. MINISTRY IN THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH

From the Book of Common Prayer Catechism:

Q. Who are the ministers of the church?A.The ministers of the Church are lay persons, bishops,

priests, and deacons.(Book of Common Prayer, 855.)

Ministry of Lay Persons

One of the more important developments in TheEpiscopal Church in the last generation has been the

recovery ofbaptismal ministry. There were major changesto the baptism liturgy in the revision of the 1979 Book ofCommon Prayer. Central to this recovery has been theunderstanding that baptism is the full incorporation intothe life of the church. Other changes in the liturgyallowed for more active participation of lay persons inworship. Commissions on ministry have been establishedin each diocese, and part of their mandate is to help allpersons, not just those ordained, to discern the ministry towhich they are called.

Lay persons serve in a variety of roles and capacities in

the church. Some lay persons are commissionedmissionaries of The Episcopal Church and serve in theglobal mission field. Others serve in education and churchadministration. There are ministries to which lay personscan be commissioned and licensed, such as lay preacher orlay reader (reading services in absence of an ordainedminister). Very popular commissioned ministries includeLay Eucharistic Minister and Lay Eucharistic Visitor,persons who assist in the distribution of communion in theliturgy as well as to the sick and infirm.

Ministry of Bishops

The Episcopal Church received a succession of bishopsfrom the Church of England which dates back to theconsecration of the first Archbishop of Canterbury in 597(and prior to that to the apostolic church).

There are at least four different kinds of bishops in TheEpiscopal Church:

Diocesan bishops are elected by special gatherings of adiocese, where lay persons and clergy are represented.Each election of a bishop must in turn be confirmed by

the broader church. A majority of bishops with

jurisdiction (diocesan bishops) and the StandingCommittees of each diocese must consent to an election.If an election falls within 120 days of the EpiscopalChurchs General Convention, then the consents take placeat the Convention.

Bishops Coadjutor are bishops elected by diocesesbishop and serve jointly with the outgoing diocesan (fromthe Latin co-adjuo, to work together). Once the diocesanformally resigns the bishop coadjutor becomes the diocesanbishop.

Bishops Suffragan are bishops elected by a diocesanconvention but they are not diocesan bishops, they areassigned an area of oversight by the diocesan bishop. Somebishops suffragan have regional areas; others have specificthematic areas (such as oversight of deacons). They also donot serve coterminously with the diocesan: when adiocesan retires, a suffragan is under no obligation toresign and may serve until his or her own resignation orretirement.

Assisting Bishops are bishops who are employed by adiocese to assist the diocesan and suffragan bishops. Theyare bishops who have been elected and served elsewhereand have either retired or resigned from a previousepiscopal position. They serve at the discretion of thediocesan bishop.

In the Episcopal Church, bishops have sacramentalfunctions. Only a bishop may ordain; however, allcandidates for ordination must be approved by both thediocesan bishop and the dioceses Standing Committee.Only a bishop may preside a Confirmation.

Bishops have administrative functions as part of their

exercise of oversight. Bishops play a central role in thedisciplinary process involving clergy, and are the oneswhich pronounce sentences on clergy, though they areassisted by other committees in this work. Bishops alsoplay an advisory role in the process by which congregationsselect their clergy, but may not appoint clergy persons.

Bishops also serve the broader church. Bishops are seenas having a particular responsibilities as chief pastor in the


Ministry: Ordained and LayAppendix F


34/42

diocese. They also have a special responsibility to guardthe faith and doctrine of the wider church, and are calledto guard the faith, un

Documents

Make Us One With Christ