Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MAGNA CARTA: NO ONE – EVEN
THE KING – IS ABOVE THE LAW
– EVEN IP LAW
Team 5
Austin IP American Inn of Court
February 2015
INTRODUCTION The Magna What?
Magna Carta
• “The Great Charter” in Latin
• Originally issued in 1215
• Established that no one –even the King – was above the
law
• Basis for many of our American law principles – even in IP
law
Outline
• Events Leading to the Magna Carta
• Signing of the Magna Carta
• Implication of Magna Carta on IP Law in England
• Effect of Magna Carta in 13 Colonies
• Magna Carta and the US Constitution
• Magna Carta’s Effect on Current US Laws
WE NEED THE MAGNA
CARTA! Why exactly?
The King had upset VIPs
• The Catholic Church
• Barons
The Church
• Excommunicated King John in 1209
• Banned all church services in England in 1207
• Nobody could go to church
What happens when you don’t go to
Church in Medieval England?
(at least according to the Catholic Church at the time)
King John wanted more from the Barons
• Knights
• To fight battles after losing again in France
• $$ in the form of taxes or scutage
• To pay for war
• Make up for lost income from lands lost in France
SUMMER 1214 King John
Servant
What happened next?
• Baron’s held London
• Could exclude King after defeating him
• Controlled income
SIGNING OF THE
MAGNA CARTA
RUNNYMEDE Baron 1
Baron 2
Baron 3
King John
King’s Representative 1
King’s Representative 2
Runnymede, England
Features of the Document
• Signed on June 15, 1215 at Runnymede by King John and his Barons.
• Contained 63 separate clauses.
• Addressed to primarily to Barons, Earls, Knights, Clergymen, and Government Officials.
• Left to be enforced by the Barons.
• Contains several clause that resonate with principles in modern English law and the U.S. Constitution.
Legal Principle Magna Carta Clause(s) U.S. Constitution
Freedom of Religion 1: “First, … that the English Church
shall be free, and shall have its
rights undiminished, and its liberties
unimpaired.”
63: “Wherefore we will and firmly
decree that the English church shall
be free …”
1st Amendment
Independent Judiciary,
Circuit Courts, and
Venue
17:“Ordinary lawsuits shall not follow
the royal court around, but shall be
held in a fixed place.”
18:: “Inquests … shall be taken only
in their proper county court. We
ourselves, or in our absence abroad
our chief justice, will send two
justices to each county four times a
year …”
Article III Section 1
No Cruel and Unusual
Punishment
20: “For a trivial offence, a free man
shall be fined only in proportion to
the degree of his offence, and for a
serious offence correspondingly, but
not so heavily as to deprive him of
his livelihood.”
8th Amendment
(Proportionality Clause)
Key Clauses
Legal Principle Magna Carta Clause(s) U.S. Constitution
Governmental Taking 28: “No constable or other bailiff of
ours shall take the corn or other
chattels of any one except he
straightway give money for them, or
can be allowed a respite in that
regard by the will of the seller.”
5th Amendment (Takings
Clause)
Search and
Seizure/Jury Trial
39: “No freeman shall be taken, or
imprisoned, or disseized, or
outlawed, or exiled, or in any way
harmed - nor will we go upon or send
upon him - save by the lawful
judgment of his peers or by the law of
the land.”
4th Amendment/5th
Amendment Due
Process
Standards of Weights
and Measures
35: “There shall be one measure of
wine throughout our whole realm, and
one measure of ale and one measure
of corn - namely, the London quart -
and one width of dyed and russet and
hauberk cloths - namely, two ells
below the selvage. And with weights,
moreover, it shall be as with
measures.”
Article I Section 8
(Enumerated Powers of
Congress)
Key Clauses (continued)
MAGNA CARTA AND
BRITISH IP LAW First Patent Grant
King John Henry III
King Henry III
• Magna Carta
• Magna Carta Reissued
• Omitted Ability of Barons to override the King through Force
• King Henry III more lenient to barons
• Emphasized Constitutional rule
• IP Law
• King Henry granted trades people protection for discoveries
• First known grant in 1236
• Confirmation of grant by Mayor of Bordeaux to Bonafusus de Sancta
Columbia
• Dyeing of textiles
Grant of Privilege of Invention to
Bonafusus
For 15 years, exclusive right to Bonafusus and his
workers to:
1) make cloths of various colors using secret
dyeing techniques; and
2) control imports of wool, dye or textile-making
equipment into Bordeaux.
Source: Bruce W. Bugbee, Genesis Of American Patent And Copyright Law 14 (1967)
PATENT GRANT TO
BONAFUSUS Bonafusus
Bonafusus’ Worker
Mayor
King Henry
TIMELINE OF MAGNA
CARTA Perspective from England
Magna Carta Timeline
Source: http://www.historytoday.com/ralph-v-turner/meaning-magna-carta-1215
1215
• First Magna Carta Signing
1217, 1225
• Reissued
1265
• King Henry renewed promise to observe MC
1297
• King Edward I acknowledged he was bound by MC
14th Century
• Parliament reconfirmed and enacted statues to reinforce.
• “No free man” was replaced with “No man”
Magna Carta Timeline (continued)
Source: http://www.historytoday.com/ralph-v-turner/meaning-magna-carta-1215
15th – 17th Century
• Carta not rallied behind, but common law relied on it.
17th Century
• Conflict between Parliament and King relied on Carta as England’s “ancient constitution”
18th Century
• Tory support for Carta.
• Whigs question its relevance. Call for Parliament reform, but kindled by French Revolution.
19th Century
• After French Revolution, Carta relied on to reform Parliament. Parliament passed statutes abrogating the Carta.
1970 and beyond
• Only 4 chapters left in tact.
Four Remaining Chapters
• Chapters 1, 13 and 39 of King John’s Charter
– Freedom for English Church
– City of London guaranteed ancient liberties and free customs
– Curbing crown’s power to pursue individuals beyond the law
• Key Provision of the Carta
• Chapter 37 of the 1225 Charter
– Clause about the liberties being in perpetuity
• But across the Atlantic….
Source: http://www.historytoday.com/ralph-v-turner/meaning-magna-carta-1215
MAGNA CARTA AND 13
COLONIES
Intellectual Property Law in Colonies •American Colonies:
• Each colony has its own body of patent law
• Patents issued by local legislatures
•Granted exclusive “to make” rights and
sometimes sale within territory
•Focus was on a new trade or industry
•Duration of the protection varied between
seven and twenty years
Source: Bracha, Oren, Owning Ideas: A History of Anglo-American Intellectual Property, Chapter 1, UT Law School
Sir Edward Coke (1552-1634)
• An English Barrister, judge, and politician
• Attorney General for England
• Chief Justice of the King’s Bench
• Revived the Magna Carta in 17th Century
• His Interpretation of Magna Carta • Magna Carta reaffirmed liberties of common law
• Even Kings must comply with the common law
Colonists’ Interpretation
•Relied on Sir Coke’s interpretation
•Colonists would have all "liberties,
franchises and immunities,” as if
they had been born in England
Plaque in Jonestown, VA
• For example, the Virginia
Charter of 1606 (largely
drafted by Sir Coke)
Conflicts between England and Colonists
the Colonies
•England:
•Stamp Act 1765 in Colonies
•Required stamp tax on all legal documents, newspapers,
pamphlets, playing cards, dice, and all other printed material
• Including issued patents
•Colonists
•MA assembly declared Stamp Act was
against the Magna Carta
•Relied on Sir Coke’s argument that common
law (codified in the Carta) superseded
Parliament
• No taxation without representation
STAMP ACT 1765 Petitioner
Colonist 1
Colonist 2
Colonist 3
Ship Captain
SIGNING OF THE
CONSTITUTION
Magna Carta and the Constitution
• Magna Carta: Superior to other acts of government
• Constitution: “the supreme law of the land”
• Magna Carta: No man is above the law
• John Adams: “A government of laws, not men”
• Magna Carta: Idea of individual rights
• The Bill of Rights
Legal Principle Magna Carta Clause(s) U.S. Constitution
Freedom of Religion 1: “First, … that the English Church
shall be free, and shall have its
rights undiminished, and its liberties
unimpaired.”
63: “Wherefore we will and firmly
decree that the English church shall
be free …”
1st Amendment
Independent Judiciary,
Circuit Courts, and
Venue
17:“Ordinary lawsuits shall not follow
the royal court around, but shall be
held in a fixed place.”
18:: “Inquests … shall be taken only
in their proper county court. We
ourselves, or in our absence abroad
our chief justice, will send two
justices to each county four times a
year …”
Article III Section 1
No Cruel and Unusual
Punishment
20: “For a trivial offence, a free man
shall be fined only in proportion to
the degree of his offence, and for a
serious offence correspondingly, but
not so heavily as to deprive him of
his livelihood.”
8th Amendment
(Proportionality Clause)
Key Clauses
Legal Principle Magna Carta Clause(s) U.S. Constitution
Governmental Taking 28: “No constable or other bailiff of
ours shall take the corn or other
chattels of any one except he
straightway give money for them, or
can be allowed a respite in that
regard by the will of the seller.”
5th Amendment (Takings
Clause)
Search and
Seizure/Jury Trial
39: “No freeman shall be taken, or
imprisoned, or disseized, or
outlawed, or exiled, or in any way
harmed - nor will we go upon or send
upon him - save by the lawful
judgment of his peers or by the law of
the land.”
4th Amendment/5th
Amendment Due
Process
Standards of Weights
and Measures
35: “There shall be one measure of
wine throughout our whole realm, and
one measure of ale and one measure
of corn - namely, the London quart -
and one width of dyed and russet and
hauberk cloths - namely, two ells
below the selvage. And with weights,
moreover, it shall be as with
measures.”
Article I Section 8
(Enumerated Powers of
Congress)
Key Clauses (continued)
SIGNING OF THE
CONSTITUTION James Madison
John Hancock
Benjamin Franklin
2 Forefathers
MAGNA CARTA TODAY
Jay Z’s Magna Carta Holy Grail (with Justin Timberlake)
No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; nor shall
private property be taken for public use, without
just compensation.
U.S. Constitution 5th Amendment
Magna Carta Clause 39
No free man shall be seized or
imprisoned, or stripped of his
rights or possessions, or
outlawed or exiled, or deprived
of his standing in any other
way, nor will we proceed with
force against him, or send
others to do so, except by the
lawful judgment of his equals
or by the law of the land.
Are Patents 5th Amendment Property?
• Zoltek Corp. v. United States, 58 Fed.Cl. 688, 690 (Fed. Cl. 2003)
“[T]his Court holds that Plaintiff may assert in this Court a claim outside of §
1498 for a taking of its patent rights under the Fifth Amendment.”
• Zoltek Corp. v. United States, 442 F.3d 1345, 1353 (Fed.Cir.2006)
(per curiam; Gajarsa, J. concurring; Dyk, J. concurring; Plager, J.
dissenting)
“We reverse the trial court's ruling that Zoltek can allege patent
infringement as a Fifth Amendment taking under the Tucker Act.”
• Zoltek Corp. v. United States, 672 F.3d 1309, 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
(en banc)
“Since the Government's potential liability under §1498(a) is established,
we need not and do not reach the issue of the Government's possible
liability under the Constitution for a taking. The trial court's determinations
on that issue are vacated.”
Constitutionality of IPRs
• MCM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co., case no. 15-1091
(Fed. Cir.)
• Principal Brief for Appellant MCM Portfolio LLC filed on January 20,
2015 at 53:
• “An IPR proceeding does not involve the government acting in its
sovereign capacity in connection with the performance of the
constitutional functions of the executive such as tax collection. In
creating the IPR, Congress was not authorizing an activity which
the executive has traditionally performed in its sovereign
capacity. Instead, Congress authorized the transfer of patent
validity adjudications from Article III Courts to the USPTO,
thereby denying Patent Owners access to a jury trial in violation
of the Seventh Amendment.”
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy
shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be
preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-
examined in any Court of the United States, than according
to the rules of the common law.
U.S. Constitution 7th Amendment
Jury Right in IP Cases
• Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc., 523 U.S.
340, 342 (1998)
“We hold that although the statute is silent on the point, the Seventh
Amendment provides a right to a jury trial, which includes a right to
a jury determination of the amount of statutory damages.”
• Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370,
377 (1996)
“Equally familiar is the descent of today's patent infringement action
from the infringement actions tried at law in the 18th century, and
there is no dispute that infringement cases today must be tried to a
jury, as their predecessors were more than two centuries ago.”
Summary
• Basic Principle of Magna Carta
• No man –not even the King – is above the law
• US laws based on Magna Carta principles
• IP Law influenced by the Carta