1
Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. © crown copyright & database right (2018). All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence No: 100021242 Loch Eck Land Management Plan M10 Design Concept Scale: 1:35,000 @ A3 08/04/2018 ± The full forest area lies within the Loch Lomond & the Trossachs National Park Legend Loch Eck Land Management Plan Boundary Ancient Woodland Inventory (SNHi) Ancient of Semi Natural Origin Long Established of Plantation Origin Loch Eck SSSI Slope Stability Risk Score Low Low to Moderate Moderate to High Forest Roads & Tracks Clearfelling: bring forward Larch fellings where possible to reduce longer term impacts of P.ramorum. Link felling phases to road infrastructure and upgrade maintenance cost. Prioritise windblow clearance. Seek to create coupes that are sympathetic to landform and avoid tiering of coupes with altitude, subject to harvesting practicalities and windfirm edges. Prioritise removal of WH stands. Continuous Cover: Limited scope, so target modest areas with the highest positive landscape and recreational impacts and where INNS and more competitive conifer regeneration can be effectively managed. Long term retentions with low levels of intervention can fulfil many of the roles of CCF in the medium term. Restructuring: Retain a critical mass of productive conifer with the focus on SS. Target mixed conifer areas for maximum landscape/recreational impact and where fencing can be used cost effectively. Maintain conifer diversity by accepting natural regeneration and maintaining stands of NS & DF past the optimal rotation length where these are stable. The early removal of Larch & WH will deplete the area of diverse conifer significantly. Restore PAWS areas using natural regeneration where possible but consider the potential for productive broadleaves on PAWS sites using planted stock outwith the designated sites. Retain some areas of NS within the SSSI to provide Red Squirrel habitat and raptor nest sites. Control of INNS: Remove WH stands and control regeneration where this is likely to impact on designated sites. Target rhododendron control to reduce impacts on designated sites & on areas coming up for felling. Use newly planted fast growing SS to control, break up and buffer rhododendron areas. Areas proposed for PAWS restoration post felling are particularly vulnerable to Rhododendron establishment and should be a priority for control after control within the designated sites.

Loch Eck Land Management Plan · 2019. 12. 11. · Loch Eck Land Management Plan M10 Design Concept Scale: 1:35,000 @ A3 08/04/2018 ± The full forest area lies within the Loch Lomond

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Loch Eck Land Management Plan · 2019. 12. 11. · Loch Eck Land Management Plan M10 Design Concept Scale: 1:35,000 @ A3 08/04/2018 ± The full forest area lies within the Loch Lomond

Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalfof HMSO. © crown copyright & database right (2018). All rightsreserved. Ordnance Survey Licence No: 100021242

Loch EckLand Management Plan

M10 Design Concept

Scale: 1:35,000 @ A3

08/04/2018 ±

The full forest area lies within the Loch Lomond & the Trossachs National Park

LegendLoch Eck Land Management Plan Boundary

Ancient Woodland Inventory (SNHi)Ancient of Semi Natural OriginLong Established of Plantation Origin

Loch Eck SSSI

Slope Stability Risk ScoreLowLow to ModerateModerate to High

Forest Roads & Tracks

Clearfelling: bring forward Larch fellings where possible to reduce longer termimpacts of P.ramorum. Link felling phases to road infrastructure and upgrademaintenance cost. Prioritise windblow clearance. Seek to create coupes that aresympathetic to landform and avoid tiering of coupes with altitude, subject toharvesting practicalities and windfirm edges. Prioritise removal of WH stands.

Continuous Cover: Limited scope, so target modestareas with the highest positive landscape andrecreational impacts and where INNS and morecompetitive conifer regeneration can be effectivelymanaged. Long term retentions with low levels ofintervention can fulfil many of the roles of CCF in themedium term.

Restructuring: Retain a critical mass of productive conifer with the focus on SS. Target mixedconifer areas for maximum landscape/recreational impact and where fencing can be used costeffectively. Maintain conifer diversity by accepting natural regeneration and maintaining stands ofNS & DF past the optimal rotation length where these are stable. The early removal of Larch &WH will deplete the area of diverse conifer significantly. Restore PAWS areas using naturalregeneration where possible but consider the potential for productive broadleaves on PAWS sitesusing planted stock outwith the designated sites. Retain some areas of NS within the SSSI toprovide Red Squirrel habitat and raptor nest sites.

Control of INNS: Remove WH stands and control regeneration wherethis is likely to impact on designated sites. Target rhododendron controlto reduce impacts on designated sites & on areas coming up for felling.Use newly planted fast growing SS to control, break up and bufferrhododendron areas. Areas proposed for PAWS restoration post fellingare particularly vulnerable to Rhododendron establishment and shouldbe a priority for control after control within the designated sites.