17
REP/003/2017 LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG October 2016 to March 2017 WCSSG Scrutiny Report

LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017

LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG October 2016 to March 2017

WCSSG Scrutiny Report

Page 2: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 1 of 16

Contents

Highlights 2

Issues 5

Health, Safety, Security & Environment 6

Waste Management Services 8

National Waste Programme 10

Site Operations 12

Science & Engineering 13

Looking Forward 14

National Waste Programme Dashboard – March 2017 15

Page 3: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 2 of 16

This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level

Waste Repository and provides a brief look ahead.

Highlights

It has been another year of achievement for LLWR, with a record amount of scope

delivered safely across the business and more waste diverted from the Repository Site

than ever before.

The majority of LLWR’s PBIs were achieved and the organisation successfully

managed a record Annual Site Funding Limit within tight tolerances. This was a result

of the excellent forecasting discipline that has been developed into business planning

activities.

Paul Pointon, former Head of Site, has

transitioned into a new role of Deputy Managing

Director. This new role gives oversight to

leadership and governance roles at the same

time as providing continuity, stability and

increased capacity to enable the creation and

management of a programme office to administer

the Repository Development Programme (RDP)

whilst freeing up the Managing Director (MD)

from day-to-day business activities.

Paul is one of the nine original PBO Nominated Staff representatives from 2008 and

was instrumental in developing the PBO’s tender for the Management and Operation

of LLW Repository Ltd. He has worked alongside the MD and Lead Team colleagues

in developing appropriate fit-for-purpose management and operational processes and

the underpinning organisational structure. He has been integral to the creation of a

solid foundation for the delivery of a successful enterprise, and has successfully

performed the function of Acting MD in the MD’s absence.

Replacing Paul as Head of LLWR Site is PBO Nominated Staff representative Iain

Irving. Iain held the role of Group Vice President, Nuclear and Environment

International Group with AECOM, and has extensive experience within the nuclear

industry and a wide ranging track record for cost effective delivery in business

development, stakeholder relations, project management, nuclear plant operations,

waste management, decommissioning and programme controls.

Iain Irving with Paul Pointon

Page 4: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 3 of 16

Iain will not be a stranger to members of the WCSSG as he represented Sellafield Ltd

in this forum during his time as Stakeholder Relations Director as a PBO Secondee.

The RDP Tranche 1 Business Case was approved by the NDA and associated funding

package allocated.

Installation of the new Security Fence around the Site perimeter was completed on

time and under budget, despite delays due to the discovery of uncharted cables.

Completion of the first pair of Type B transport packages and the receipt of the

transport licence from Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) has been a major

accomplishment. This first pair of packages will be used by Harwell to transport some

if it’s ILW to Sellafield starting in May. The second pair of packages are nearly

complete and in May, they will be delivered to LLWR Site to start the process of

shipping the ILW generated as a part of the PCM programme back to Sellafield.

The Sellafield Tritium Block was successfully consigned to the Cyclife Metal Recycling

Facility (MRF) at Lillyhall, supporting a waste management milestone for Sellafield to

complete before the end of the financial year.

Photographs of the new Security Fence

First pair of Type B packages (Novapaks)

Page 5: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 4 of 16

The LLWR/GRAHAM Construction ED&C Framework received industry recognition at

the Considerate Constructors Scheme (CCS) awards in Manchester by winning a

Bronze Award. In receiving this award from CCS – a scheme established by the

construction sector to improve its image by raising standards - the Framework was

rated ‘beyond compliant’ in all five categories under scrutiny. It is the first time LLWR

has entered the national award scheme and it is delighted with the success.

LLWR has again been active in the community, making donations to worthy causes

and encouraging volunteers from the workforce to participate in community initiatives.

Employees have raised £5,000 for the chosen charity of the year, West Cumbria

Carers, which includes match funding of £2,000 from the company.

LLWR have also approved a five-year sponsorship of the First Lego League and

members of the workforce gave up their time to support West Cumbrian schools in the

endeavour. A donation of hi-vis vests was made to Thornhill Primary School’s nursery,

and youngsters on a charity visit from deprived areas in Belarus were presented with

hi-vis bags filled with practical gifts and mementoes.

Representatives from LLWR and GRAHAM’s receiving the CCS Award

Page 6: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 5 of 16

Issues

Discussions with the NDA will continue over the next few months to understand the

scope for the third contract term.

Preparatory work is underway for RDP, a Programme which will necessitate disruption

to Drigg Village on a larger scale than in the past. LLWR will do all in its power to

mitigate disruption and as many deliveries as possible will arrive on Site by rail.

LLWR are currently investigating two potential misconsignment events. The

Environment Agency has been informed.

The Perfect Day initiative, which was introduced by LLWR’s decommissioning partner,

NSG, has been rolled out into the organisation. LLWR has modified the criteria set by

NSG to better suit to the organisations activities.

LLWR’s Perfect Day Criteria

Everyone goes home safe

We don’t damage property through carelessness or inattention

We work to our procedures or make timely challenge if they’re wrong

No complaints from stakeholders and local residents

Our environments isn’t harmed by our activities

No Security events

We deliver our work to the agreed timescales

Our behaviours and actions are in line with our Standards and Expectations

193 ‘Perfect Days’ were achieved in the financial year, equivalent to 53% of total days.

Whilst this is an encouraging figure for a concept relatively new to the organisation,

LLWR will strive to improve on this during 2017/18. The majority of lost days in

2016/17 occurred due to work planning and schedule adherence events.

Page 7: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 6 of 16

Health, Safety, Security and Environment

LLWR ended the financial year with 5.5 years without a RIDDOR reportable injury and

achieved 193 Perfect Days.

The total number of minor injuries, such as minor cuts, trips and falls, suffered by

LLWR staff and contractors was higher than LLWR views acceptable. Moving into

2017/18 financial year focus will be applied to improving basic safety behaviours with

the aim of minimising the number of injuries occurring as a result of insufficient care

and attention being paid when carrying out mundane, everyday activities.

Good progress was made against the EHS&Q Improvement Plan, with 76% of the

Plan being achieved by the year end, and some real safety improvements being

achieved, such as the declassification of magazines from C5 to C3 status (meaning

air-fed suit entries are no longer required and will be replaced with the use of air

hoods), the removal of the majority of redundant radioactive sources from LLWR site

and the safe demolition of a former PCM Drum Store.

The new perimeter Security Fence was completed in January 2017 and work has

moved to the new entrance set up including car parks, search bay and road layout.

One of the benefits of the new entrance layout is that it enables visitors and deliveries

to be processed before entering the secure area of the site. It also allows some

meetings to be held outside the secure area in the existing conference facility.

Page 8: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 7 of 16

The focus on cyber security continued with strengthening the understanding of staff on

the risks of cyber-attack at home and at work.

The new Radioactive Substances Regulation (RSR) Permit allowing ongoing disposal

of waste, issued by the EA in late 2015, was fully implemented during the year with

work undertaken across the organisation to achieve this. In line with the new Permit

LLWR successfully implemented the required transition to Radioactive Waste Advisors

(RWA) responsible for advising on all Permit aspects.

Significant work was undertaken to ensure the new Security Fence and Repository

Infrastructure Projects have had minimal impact on the ecology and environment at

and adjacent to the LLWR Site, despite working in environmentally sensitive areas

near the Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and other protected habitats on Site.

While Environmental compliance has in general remained high throughout the year

two significant learning reports were raised early in 2017, relating to potential

misconsignment of LLW. This was already raised as a significant risk for LLWR and

has led to further focus in this area.

The radiological safety performance at LLWR has continued to be good. In 2016, for

the 5th year in a row the maximum radiation dose to any person working on the site

was less than 1 millisievert. For the 7th consecutive year, the maximum dose has also

decreased compared to the previous year.

The average dose to people working on the site in 2016 was approximately 0.1

millisieverts, a quarter of the average recorded 5 years earlier. The maximum

Artist Impression of the new Site entrance

Page 9: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 8 of 16

radiation dose to a member of the public in 2016 as a result of direct radiation from the

site is estimated to be about 0.032 millisieverts. To put these figures into context, the

average radiation dose to people in the UK from natural radiation sources in the

environment equates to about 2.2 millisieverts per year.

Waste Management Services

LLWR continues to work closely with UK waste producers to ensure that only LLW that

cannot be dealt with elsewhere is disposed of at our Site.

Key Statistics

952 containers transported by road nationally to waste treatment and disposal

facilities through the Transport Framework during the year. This compared to

856 in 2015/16;

Metallic waste treatment – target of 3320te exceeded with a total of 3855te

being treated this year, 3562te of which was from NDA Sites and 293te from

Non-NDA waste producers;

Combustible waste treatment –target of 2482m3 exceeded with a total of

3098m3 being treated this year, 2896m3 from NDA Sites and 202m3 from Non-

NDA waste producers;

VLLW disposal –target of 2915m3 exceeded with a total of 6509m3 being

treated this year, 3829m3 from NDA Sites and 2680m3 from Non-NDA waste

producers;

LLW disposal – 174 ISO containers were disposed of in the year, up from 171

in 2015/16.

LLWR continues to develop its range of Waste Management Services in the line with

UK policy for the management of radioactive waste from the nuclear industry.

**** Metallic Waste (te) to (m3) Conversion: 1.00 te/m3 (assuming 10te per HHISO)

Note: Non-NDA Sites include all other organisations that produce radioactive waste.

Page 10: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 9 of 16

LLWR’s services enable waste producers to implement the waste hierarchy in a safe,

compliant and cost-effective manner. We continue to act as the industry’s ‘integrator’ -

holding contracts with every organisation in the UK that produces radioactive waste as

well as contracts with multiple suppliers to deliver waste characterisation, packaging,

transport, treatment and disposal services.

LLWR’s diversion statistics were the most impressive to date, with collaboration,

between departments within the company and with organisations across the estate, a

factor in this success. Some 3,855te of metals were diverted in 2016/17, which was

more than double the 2015/16 total of 1,505te. In addition, 3,098m³ of waste went

down the Combustible route compared to 2,216m³ in 2015/16, and the volume of Very

Low Level Waste diverted also increased from 5,311m³ in 2015/16 to 6,509m³ in

2016/17.

Service Delivery managed a record 52 transports and approved 82 waste

consignments in the final week of the financial year, to meet unprecedented customer

demand.

The 2016/17 financial year was brought to a successful end by facilitating the

movement of a 100-tonne concrete block on 31st March 2017 from Sellafield. The

Tritium block was successfully consigned to the Cyclife MRF at Lillyhall, supporting a

waste management milestone for Sellafield to complete before the end of the financial

year. It was a project with extremely tight timescales, and involved a great deal of

collaborative working between LLWR, Sellafield, Cyclife and lifting contractor

Mammoet.

Sellafield Tritium Block

Page 11: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 10 of 16

Significant co-operation between LLWR, Capenhurst Nuclear Services (CNS) and the

Magnox Ltd central team ensured CNS was able to deliver a consignment of ion

exchange resins toTradebe Inutec before the end of the fiscal year. Close

collaboration ensured safety case amendments were completed at the Winfrith site in

a timely manner, enabling Tradebe Inutec to accept the waste before the year end.

In another example of collaborative working, LLWR opened new diversion routes for

low level waste from Rolls Royce in Derby. For many years this waste was super-

compacted and disposed of in the vaults at LLWR. It now utilises a Combustible route,

preserving disposal capacity at the LLWR.

In 2016/17 LLWR disposed of 174 containers, an increase of 3 on the previous year.

National Waste Programme

LLWR leads the ongoing implementation of the UK’s LLW Strategy on behalf of the

NDA through the National Waste Programme. The focus of the Programme is to work

with the waste producing sites and the wider stakeholder group to share good practice

and to support its embedding across the nuclear industry. LLWR have made good

progress on a diverse range of collaborative projects with stakeholders to support the

sharing and embedding of good practice across the industry:

A project to assess the advantages, disadvantages and potential implications

of different international models of radioactive waste classification was

completed;

A technology assessment was completed for a group of wastes (wastes failing

the discrete item limit) which are not suitable for disposal in the LLWR. This

identified a number of potential options which need further work to make them

available;

The Strategic Review 2016 – a report produced every three years to provide a

description of how the UK nuclear industry is managing its LLW at a given point

in time – was completed;

The first phase of a collaborative study with waste producers and Radioactive

Waste Management (RWM) focussed on improving the quality of the

information on the inventory of LLW/ILW boundary waste was completed. The

second part of this study will be completed by June 2017;

The Programme has continued to provide support to NDA, RWM and other

stakeholders on the Problematic Waste Integrated Project Team, which is

Page 12: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 11 of 16

seeking to improve how wastes without established management routes are

managed. This has included the delivery of a study to identify preferred options

for improving the management of problematic wastes and the development of a

work programme to be delivered April 2017-March 2018 and beyond;

A review of a national strategic options study for the management of metallic

waste was completed. This concluded that the options study continues to be

valid and does not require fundamental redevelopment at this time;

Work has continued on developing and rolling out e-learning and self-directed

learning training modules, to support organisations and individuals gain

knowledge and up-skilling in LLW management.

LLWR have continued to hold regular meetings with stakeholders to ensure that there

is oversight and challenge of the Programme, and to support the sharing of learning

and good practice around the industry. Meetings include:

The six-monthly Delivery Overview Group, which involves the widest

stakeholder group including waste producers, the supply chain, regulators and

government sharing information on LLW management.

The six-monthly Regulatory Meeting, which enables detailed conversations

with the regulators on the progress within the Programme.

The six-monthly Practitioners Forum, which enables waste engineers to share

successes, challenges, problems and solutions with each other.

The monthly meetings with waste producers in the NDA estate (involving the

non-NDA estate quarterly).

The Programme Board, which involves senior representatives from waste

producing organisations to provide oversight and challenge to the Programme.

A range of reports have continued to be produced for the different stakeholders to

share information on progress made within the Programme. The National Waste

Programme Quarterly Report is available to all stakeholders and can be accessed on

the LLWR website www.llwrsite.com.

Support also continues to the wider LLWR organisation through running workshops,

delivering technical work, consolidating responses on behalf of the organisation to

external consultations and participating in visits to site by external stakeholders.

Page 13: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 12 of 16

Site Operations

The PCM Programme is making good progress and decommissioning of Magazines 3

and 9 is ahead of schedule. The uncertainty in the condition and extent of

decontamination required in the void areas of Magazines had been a key risk to the

decommissioning programme.

Magazine 9’s void area has been successfully decontaminated and void recovery

operations are progressing well.

Decommissioning continues with Magazine 3, which has now been re-classified from a

C5 working area, requiring air-fed suit entry, to a C3 working area, only requiring air-

fed hoods. The hoods allow greater freedom of movement and therefore accelerated

productivity. Sampling of legacy drums continues to progress and a revised legacy

drum sampling strategy is being proposed to reduce the sampling requirements for this

population. This is a result of our confidence in characterisation and will enable us to

work more efficiently.

The LLWR Site Incineration Route went live during the period. This will result in almost

all of the soft waste generated on the Site, predominantly from the PCM Project, being

diverted from Supercompaction to Incineration, preserving Vault capacity.

The first shipment of drummed soft waste arising from operations at the LLWR Site

was consigned for incineration at the Tradebe facility in February.

Magazine 9 Void Ceiling Removal

Page 14: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 13 of 16

Demolition of the long-standing former PCM drum store on Site has also been

completed. The drum store was considered for reuse two years ago, after lying empty

for several years. However the PCM team’s efficient waste management practices

ensured the number of drums generated fell, meaning it was not required. Base slab

from the building has been removed and exported to Vault 9 for interim storage, ready

for eventual use as infill material in the RDP profile cap.

Improvements to the perimeter track around Vaults 8 & 9 have been completed ahead

of schedule.

Fabrication of pipework for the refurbishment of the vault discharge system has

commenced. Planning for the next phase of Manhole 11 Refurbishment is well

underway with the design element of the project complete and execution phase about

to commence.

Science & Engineering

The planning consent for the closure engineering over trenches 1 to 7, Vault 8 & 9 and

the construction of an extension to Vault 9 and 2 new vaults, Vaults 10 & 11 included a

number of pre-commencement planning conditions that result in the preparation and

submission of several documents to address these conditions. They will be issued to

CCC shortly for approval.

Demolition of the PCM Drum Store

Page 15: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 14 of 16

The Programme Level Business Case for the RDP, which aligns with the planning

application, was approved by the NDA Executive and Board of Directors in August

2016. The detailed project business cases and supporting documentation that

comprise Tranche 1 of the works were approved by the NDA in January 2017. We are

now in detailed design phase and about to enter he execute phase of tranche 1 and

the first visible sign that preparatory work for RDP is underway will be seen later this

year when noise reduction barriers are installed.

LLWR continue to have discussions with all the relevant parties with respect to

capacity on the Cumbrian Rail line and attend the Nuclear Transport Group, sponsored

by Cumbria County Council, and the Cumbria Rail Programme Board sponsored by

the Cumbrian LEP.

Looking Forward

The focus for 2017/18 will be on the following:

Preparatory work for the RDP;

Achieving the Joint Waste Management Plan targets for waste diversion.

Forecasts predict that LLWR will manage increased volumes of waste;

Continue to manufacture Type B packaging:

Develop Lifetime Plan 2018;

Deliver a number of IT change projects;

Commence design and construction of the new Security Force Control Centre;

Look at opportunities to innovate and continue to provide value for money in

our third contract term.

Page 16: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017

te

m3

m3

m3

Sellaf ie ld Ltd

M agno x Ltd

LLWR Ltd

T o tal:

te via framework

Sellaf ie ld Ltd

M agno x Ltd

LLWR Ltd

T o tal:

m3 via framework

Sellaf ie ld Ltd 1

M agno x Ltd

LLWR Ltd

T o tal:

m3 via framework

te M etallic m3 Combusitble m3 VLLW

Onsite

Via framework Rosyth Res in Catch Tanks

Out of Scope

T o tal:

Onsite

Via framework

Out of Scope

T o tal:

Onsite

Via framework

Out of Scope

T o tal:

Ke y: Cumulative Actual Waste diverted Target / Forecast

Page 1 of 2 Last Updated: 2

March 2017 Waste Metric Dashboard

Yearly

Target

Actual

YTD

0

This table shows the cumulative actual waste diverted*** by non- NDA sites in the YTD

142 157

Yearly

Target

Combustible Treatment:

VLLW Disposal:

N / A 201

(te) (m3)N o n-N D A Site(s)

T o tal 1 : N / A 2680

2575

0

from Non- NDA Sites

1478

275

18

Period 12 : 26th February to 31st March FY 16/17

The National Waste Programme aims to communicate progress in the implementation of the Waste Hierarchy and the Nuclear Industry Strategy for Low Level Waste

Management across the UK. This dashboard shows key metrics that demonstrate the successful diversion of waste away from direct disposal and the optimal use of key

national assets, such as LLWR and waste treatment facilities on sites around the UK, typically based on delivery of Joint Waste Management Plans (JWMPs). The objective

is to encourage transparency and communicate progress to all stakeholders.

Non-NDA Sites (YTD)*****

UK Waste Diversion

Yearly

Target

Actual

YTD

2365 2511

Via framework N/A

Onsite disposal N/A

Out of Scope

T o tal:

7

N / A

Yearly

Forecast

Non- NDA estate

Ac tua l Volume Re -

Cla ssifie d YTD (m3

)SLC

Tota l 297

3855

3098

6509

1740

from NDA Sites

(excluding DSRL)

297

(Metric added for FY 16/17)

Onsite treatment

Via framework ***

Out of Scope

T o tal:

246

836

VLLW Disposal:

0

21

0

Issue04-May-17

800

0 0

926

Yearly

Target

Yearly

Target

Actual

YTD

669 744

119

Magnox Ltd ❷❸❹❺❻❼❽❾❿⓫⓬⓭

Onsite treatment

693

177

1000 T o tal: 948

Onsite treatment

Via framework

113

0

1199

Actual

YTD

665

0 0

0 0

54

0

30

0

Sellafield Ltd

126

0

Yearly

Target

1100 1226

VLLW Disposal:

Onsite treatment

34

Actual

YTD

1686

Metallic Treatment:

Actual

YTD

1740

Combustible Treatment:

2511

0

Onsite treatment

Via framework

Out of Scope

T o tal: 2365

0

LLWR Ltd

817

Yearly

Target

926800

30

Actual

YTD

Via framework

Out of Scope

Onsite disposal

Via framework

0 8136

92

74

Yearly

Target

2993

VLLW Disposal:

1318 1596

Yearly

TargetYearly

Target

1100

Actual

YTD

1226

2758

51

20

T o tal:

2085 2778

679 771

0

(m3)

0

Actual

YTD

0

Actual

YTD

0

AWE Aldermaston0

926

Onsite disposal

VLLW Disposal:

Cyclife

EDF Energy

253

800 Via framework 1416 2033 0

12

These graphs show the cumulative actual waste diverted by Low Level Waste Repository Ltd against

their JWMP targets in the YTD.

0

Metallic Treatment:

7

Yearly

Target

0

LLWR Ltd

0

Actual

YTD

126

Non-NDA Site Summary YTD ⓰⓱ ⓲⓳⓴ Diversion and Disposal Totals YTD based on Raw Waste (****)

Out of Scope N/A 105

77%

23%These graphs are a summary of the cumulative progress to date against the combined JWMP targets **.

These number do not capture VLLW disposed of on site.

NDA Site Summary YTD

These graphs show the cumulative actual waste diverted by Magnox Ltd against their JWMP targets in the

Year to Date (YTD).

Metallic Treatment:

Combustible Treatment:

Yearly

Forecast

Metallic Treatment:

0

2085 2778

948 1000

0

These graphs are a summary of the cumulative diversions to date from Non NDA sites.

Metallic Treatment:

Onsite treatment

Via framework

Actual

YTD

N/A

N/A

N/A

Yearly

Forecast

Actual

YTD

0

Combustible Treatment:

N/A 0

N/A 199

N/A 3

293

Actual

YTD

T o tal 1 :

0

These graphs show the cumulative actual waste diverted by Sellafield Ltd against their JWMP targets in the

YTD.

Out of Scope

T o tal :

119

Via framework

Out of Scope

Out of Scope

T o tal:

Out of Scope

1 Actuals/Target YTD only applies to VLLW via the framework

2482

3320 3562

2896

51

64 74

64

7

64

39

Combustible Treatment:

1318 1596

Actual

YTD

38292915

961

Yearly

Target

1100 1226

30

0

04

0Urenco UK

0

Magnox Ltd

Sellafield Ltd

123

584

Tradebe Inutec Ltd

Capenhurst Nuclear Services

Unitech

Others

Stack being loaded at AWE (VLLW)

Dounreay

0 75

0

7623

18 100

ILW → LLW Re-Classification

This table shows the actual volume of waste re- classified

from ILW to LLW in the YTD.

The values above are inclusive of material diverted through direct contracts:

0 82

m3

0

10

20

30

40

50

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

0

50

100

150

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

Period

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

te

0

500

1000

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

m3

0

200

400

600

800

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

m3

Period

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

0

500

1000

1500

2000

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

m3

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

m3

Period

Dounreay

Hunterston A

Chapelcross

Sellafield LLWR

Wylfa

Trawsfynydd

Berkeley

Oldbury

Hinkley Point A

Sizewell A

Bradwell

Dungeness A

Harwell

Winfrith

Capenhurst / Urenco UK

⓱Tradebe Inutec Fawley

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

Period

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

0

50

100

150

200

250

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12Period

12%

25%

20%

43%

m3

tem

3m

3te

m3

m3

te

te

UniTech Services Group

HMNB Clyde

RRMPOL Derby

AWE Aldermaston

Cyclife MRF Lillyhall

21

22

21 22

(1)

GE Healthcare23

23

*

Page 17: LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level Waste Repository and provides a brief look

REP/003/2017 Page 16 of 16