Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

  • Upload
    oeae

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    1/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICORO PIEDRAS CAMPUS

    PLAN OF ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING

    PART ICAMPUSMISSION DOMAINS

    Academic Program or Major: _Comparative Literature_________________________ Academic Year: 2011-20

    CampusMission Domains

    Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    Effective Oral

    Communication

    Students will demonstrate

    effective oral communication

    in all of their in-class oral

    presentations, taking intoaccount the following:

    The student will be able to

    1) Communicate effectively,

    coherently and correctly inSpanish and in English in

    oral contexts.

    2) Formulate and

    demonstrate hypotheses

    through textual analysis andeffective use of relevant

    sources in the field, such as

    professional journals,specialized books, archives,

    systems and technologies of

    information.

    3) Analyze texts, taking into

    account technical, formal,historical and thematic

    Activities:

    a) Oral

    Presentation of a

    Critical Essay(summary and

    commentary)

    b) Oral

    Presentation ofFinal Research

    Project

    Instruments:

    a) Rubric to assesseffective oral

    communication in

    oral presentationswill be used to

    assess student oral

    communication

    skills in an oral

    presentation of acritical essay and

    The criteria to be

    evaluated, as

    expressed in the

    rubric, are thefollowing:

    1) Communicate the

    presentations main

    argument effectively.2) Communicate

    content effectively on

    a more general level,

    throughout the

    presentation.3) Organize ideas and

    arguments effectively

    in the presentation.4) Utilize various

    types of materials

    (audio, visual, etc.) to

    enhance performance.

    5) Capture and holdthe audiences

    75% or more of the

    students will receive a

    score of 4 or higher (in a 6

    point rubric) in all criteria

    LITE 3011

    or other

    preliminary

    3--- levelcourse

    LITE 3045

    Introduction

    to Compara-

    tiveLiterature

    or

    LITE 3101

    or LITE

    3102

    or

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirected

    selection

    with a

    required

    finalresearch

    LITE 4---

    Course of

    directed

    selectionwith a

    required

    final

    researchpaper

    (in which

    the students

    write their

    final thesispapers)

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    2/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives

    Activities andinstruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    aspects. in the oralpresentation of the

    final research

    paper.

    attention throughquality of voice, eye

    contact, questions,

    interaction, and/or byother means.6) Demonstrate

    effective and

    appropriate use of

    language.

    paper

    EffectiveWritten

    Communication

    The students will

    demonstrate effective writtencommunication (in Spanish

    or English) in all of their

    written work, taking intoaccount the following:

    The student will be able to1) Communicate effectively,coherently and correctly in

    Spanish and in English in

    written contexts.

    2) Formulate anddemonstrate hypotheses

    through textual analysis and

    effective use of relevant

    sources in the field, such asprofessional journals,

    specialized books, archives,

    systems and technologies of

    information.3) Analyze texts, taking into

    Activities:

    a) PreliminaryResearch Paper

    Proposals

    b) Final ResearchPapers

    Instruments:a) Rubric to assess

    effective

    communication in

    analytical writingwill be used to

    assess student

    writing skills in

    the preliminaryresearch paper

    proposal and in the

    final research

    paper.

    The criteria to be

    evaluated, asexpressed in the

    rubric, are the

    following:1) Communicate

    effectively the mainargument (the thesisstatement) to be

    developed in the

    research paper.

    2) Communicateeffectively, throughout

    the research paper, the

    arguments that support

    the thesis statement.3) Communicate ideas

    through the effective

    use of language.

    4) Demonstrate anacademic and accurate

    75% or more of the

    students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6

    point rubric) in all criteria

    LITE 3011

    or otherpreliminary

    3--- level

    course

    LITE 3045

    Introductionto Compara-

    tive

    Literature

    or

    LITE 3101

    or LITE

    3102

    or

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirected

    selection

    with a

    requiredfinal

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirected

    selection

    with arequired

    finalresearchpaper

    (in which

    the students

    write theirfinal thesis

    papers)

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    3/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives

    Activities andinstruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    account technical, formal,historical and thematic

    aspects.

    4) Utilize correctly theconventional format relevantto the discipline for the

    documentation of

    bibliographical sources (i.e.

    MLA format).

    use of language.5) Demonstrate an

    accurate and

    appropriate use ofvocabulary.6) Communicate

    effectively through the

    accurate use of

    grammar.7) Communicate well

    through the effective

    organization, format,

    and presentation of thearguments.

    8) Utilize correctly the

    conventional format

    relevant to thediscipline for the

    documentation of

    bibliographical

    sources (i.e. MLA

    format).

    researchpaper

    Critical Thinking

    The student will be able to

    1) Analyze texts, taking into

    account technical, formal,

    historical and thematicaspects.

    2) Formulate and

    demonstrate hypotheses

    through textual analysis andeffective use of relevant

    Activities:

    a) Final

    Exam/Paper

    Instruments:

    a) Rubric to assess

    critical thinking

    will be used toassess student

    The criteria to be

    evaluated, as

    expressed in the

    rubric, are thefollowing:

    1) Formulate an

    appropriate hypothesis

    (the problem, questionor main argument to

    75% or more of the

    students will receive a

    score of 4 or higher (in a 6

    point rubric) in all criteria

    LITE 3011

    or other

    preliminary

    3--- levelcourse

    LITE 3101

    (Literary

    Theory)

    or LITE3102

    or LITE

    3045

    LITE 4---

    Course of

    directed

    selectionwith a

    required

    final

    researchpaper

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    4/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives

    Activities andinstruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    sources in the field, such asprofessional journals,

    specialized books, archives,

    systems and technologies ofinformation.3) Critique texts according to

    the adaptation and

    application of relevant

    theoretical frameworks,above all those that have

    shaped and defined the field

    of literary studies and its

    relationships to otherdiscourses and cultural

    manifestations.

    4) Distinguish literary

    movements, ranging fromAntiquity to Post-modernity,

    as well as their relationships

    to other cultural discourses.

    5) Present and develop a

    relevant positioning orperspective, in dialogue with

    other relevant perspectives in

    the field.6) Elaborate conclusions

    corresponding to the

    arguments developed and

    evidence presented in the

    paper.7) Communicate effectively,

    critical thinkingskills in final exam

    paper.

    be developed ordemonstrated)

    2) Contextualize the

    hypothesis.3) Make explicit thepremises relevant for

    the analysis.

    4) Present, develop

    and communicate ahypothesis that reflects

    a perspective or

    positioning in dialogue

    or debate with otherrelevant perspectives.

    5) Present, analyze

    and utilize effectively

    theinformation/evidence

    (textual or other).

    6) Elaborate

    conclusions

    corresponding to thearguments developed

    and evidence

    presented in the paper.7) Communicate

    effectively, coherently

    and correctly.

    8) Critique texts

    according to thealteration and

    or

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirectedselection

    with a

    required

    finalresearch

    paper

    (in whichthe students

    write their

    final thesispapers)

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    5/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives

    Activities andinstruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    coherently and correctly inSpanish and in English in

    oral and written contexts.

    application of relevanttheoretical

    frameworks.

    Research and

    Creation

    The student will be able to:1) Utilize, appropriately and

    effectively, sources of

    information, both in print

    form and on-line (i.e. LibraryCatalogues, Electronic

    Databases, etc.)

    2) Select relevant

    information, in terms of bothquantity and quality, to

    develop effectively the topic

    of research.3) Formulate and

    demonstrate hypothesesthrough textual analysis andeffective use of relevant

    sources in the field, such as

    professional journals,

    specialized books, archives,systems and technologies of

    information.

    4) Analyze texts, taking into

    account technical, formal,historical and thematic

    aspects.

    5) Present and develop a

    relevant positioning orperspective, in dialogue with

    Activities:a) Final Research

    Papers

    Instruments:a) Rubric to assess

    research in an

    analytical research

    paper will be usedto assess effective

    research skills in

    the final researchpaper.

    The criteria to beevaluated, as

    expressed in the

    rubric, are the

    following:1) Utilize,

    appropriately and

    effectively, sources of

    information, both inprint form and on-line

    (i.e. Library

    Catalogues, ElectronicDatabases, etc.)

    2) Select relevantinformation, in termsof both quantity and

    quality, to develop

    effectively the topic of

    research.3) Formulate an

    appropriate hypothesis

    (the problem, question

    or main argument tobe developed or

    demonstrated)

    4) Contextualize the

    hypothesis.5) Make explicit the

    75% or more of thestudents will receive a

    score of 4 or higher (in a 6

    point rubric) in all criteria

    ----------- LITE 3045Introduction

    to Compara-

    tive

    Literature

    or

    LITE 4---Course of

    directed

    selectionwith a

    requiredfinalresearch

    paper

    LITE 4---Course of

    directed

    selection

    with arequired

    final

    research

    paper(in which

    the students

    write theirfinal thesis

    papers)

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    6/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives

    Activities andinstruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    other relevant perspectives inthe field.

    6) Elaborate conclusions

    corresponding to thearguments developed andevidence presented in the

    paper.

    7) Communicate effectively,

    coherently and correctly inSpanish and in English in

    oral and written contexts.

    8) Utilize correctly the

    conventional format relevantto the discipline for the

    documentation of

    bibliographical sources (i.e.

    MLA format).

    premises relevant forthe analysis.

    6) Present, develop

    and communicate ahypothesis that reflectsa perspective or

    positioning in dialogue

    or debate with other

    relevant perspectives.7) Present, analyze

    and utilize effectively

    the

    information/evidence(textual or other).

    8) Elaborate

    conclusions

    corresponding to thearguments developed

    and evidence

    presented in the paper.

    9) Communicate

    effectively, coherentlyand correctly.

    10) Critique texts

    according to thealteration and

    application of relevant

    theoretical

    frameworks.

    11) Utilize correctlythe conventional

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    7/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives

    Activities andinstruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    format relevant to thediscipline for the

    documentation of

    bibliographicalsources (i.e. MLAformat).

    InformationLiteracy

    The student will be able to:

    1) Utilize, appropriately andeffectively, sources of

    information, both in print

    form and on-line (i.e. Library

    Catalogues, ElectronicDatabases, etc.)

    2) Select relevant

    information, in terms of bothquantity and quality, to

    develop effectively the topicof research.3) Formulate and

    demonstrate hypotheses

    through textual analysis and

    effective use of relevantsources in the field, such as

    professional journals,

    specialized books, archives,

    systems and technologies ofinformation.

    4) Utilize correctly the

    conventional format relevant

    to the discipline for thedocumentation of

    Activities:

    a) PreliminaryResearch Paper

    Proposals

    b) Final Research

    Papers

    Instruments:

    a) Rubric to assessInformation

    Literacy inresearch for aresearch paper will

    be used to assess

    student

    informationliteracy in the

    preliminary

    research paper

    proposal and in thefinal research

    paper.

    The criteria to be

    evaluated, asexpressed in the

    rubric, are the

    following:

    1) Utilize,appropriately and

    effectively, sources of

    information, both inprint form and on-line

    (i.e. LibraryCatalogues, ElectronicDatabases, etc.)

    2) Select relevant

    information, in terms

    of both quantity andquality, to develop

    effectively the topic of

    research.

    3) Utilize correctly theconventional format

    relevant to the

    discipline for the

    documentation ofbibliographical

    75% or more of the

    students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6

    point rubric) in all criteria

    --------- LITE 3045

    Introductionto Compara-

    tive

    Literature

    or

    LITE 4---Course of

    directedselectionwith a

    required

    final

    researchpaper

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirected

    selection

    with a

    requiredfinal

    research

    paper(in which

    the studentswrite theirfinal thesis

    papers)

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    8/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives

    Activities andinstruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    bibliographical sources (i.e.MLA format).

    sources (i.e. MLAformat).

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    9/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICORO PIEDRAS CAMPUS

    PLAN OF ASSESSMENT STUDENT LEARNING

    PART IIKNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, OR ATTITUDES OF THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM OR MAJOR

    Academic Program or Major: _______________________________________________________ Academi

    Knowledge,Skills

    or Attitudes of theAcademic Program

    or Major

    Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect information

    First timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    Knowledge (andApplication of

    Knowledge) of

    Literary Periods,

    Movements,Genres, and

    Theories

    The student will be able to

    1) Distinguish literarymovements, ranging from

    Antiquity to Post-modernity,

    as well as their relationships

    to other cultural discourses.2) Recognize theoretical

    schools that have shaped and

    defined the field of literary

    studies and its relationships

    to other discourses andcultural manifestations.

    3) Critique texts according to

    the adaptation and

    application of relevanttheoretical frameworks,

    above all those that have

    shaped and defined the field

    of literary studies and itsrelationships to other

    Activities:

    a) Exams,discussion type

    Instruments:

    a) Rubric to assessknowledge and

    application of

    literary periods

    and movements

    The criteria to be

    evaluated, asexpressed in the

    rubric:

    1) Conocer los

    diferentes contextoshistricos en los

    cuales se desarrollan

    los movimientos

    literarios o tericos

    bajo estudio.2) Relacionar los

    movimientos literarios

    o tericos bajo estudio

    con otras expresionesculturales de la poca

    (filosofa, arte,

    ciencia, msica,

    religin, entre otros).

    3) Comprender las

    75% or more of the

    students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6

    point rubric) in all criteria

    LITE 3011

    or otherpreliminary

    3--- level

    course

    LITE 3101

    or LITE3102

    or

    LITE 4---

    Course of

    directed

    selection

    with arequired

    final

    research

    paper

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirected

    selection

    with a

    requiredfinal

    research

    paper

    (in which

    the studentswrite their

    final thesis

    papers)

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    10/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    Knowledge,Skills

    or Attitudes of theAcademic Program

    or Major

    Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect information

    First timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    discourses and cultural

    manifestations.

    4) Analyze texts, taking into

    account technical, formal,historical and thematic

    aspects.

    relaciones de

    continuidad y

    discontinuidad entre

    un movimientoliterario o terico y los

    de otras pocas.

    4) Definir con

    precisin losconceptos temticos

    claves de un

    movimiento literario,

    cultural o terico.5) Definir con

    precisin los discursos

    retricos, tericos o

    gneros literarios queson empleados en su

    objeto de estudio.

    6) Identificar a qu

    movimiento literario,

    cultural o tericopertenece un texto,

    ensayo terico o

    expresin cultural.

    7) Identificar lostemas tpicos de un

    movimiento literario,

    cultural o terico en

    un objeto de estudioparticular.

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    11/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    Knowledge,Skills

    or Attitudes of theAcademic Program

    or Major

    Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect information

    First timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    8) Aplicar conceptos

    temticos claves de un

    movimiento literario,

    cultural o terico en suanlisis.

    9) Aplicar

    correctamente su

    conocimiento dediscursos retricos,

    tericos o gneros

    literarios como parte

    de su anlisis.10) Cuestionar,

    redefinir o ampliar el

    repertorio temtico de

    un movimientoliterario, cultural o

    terico a partir de su

    propio anlisis del

    objeto bajo estudio.

    11) Cuestionar,redefinir o ampliar el

    repertorio de discursos

    retricos, tericos o de

    gneros de unmovimiento literario,

    cultural o terico a

    partir de su propio

    anlisis del objeto bajoestudio.

  • 8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)

    12/12

    Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20

    Knowledge,Skills

    or Attitudes of theAcademic Program

    or Major

    Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect information

    First timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree