Upload
oeae
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
1/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICORO PIEDRAS CAMPUS
PLAN OF ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
PART ICAMPUSMISSION DOMAINS
Academic Program or Major: _Comparative Literature_________________________ Academic Year: 2011-20
CampusMission Domains
Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
Effective Oral
Communication
Students will demonstrate
effective oral communication
in all of their in-class oral
presentations, taking intoaccount the following:
The student will be able to
1) Communicate effectively,
coherently and correctly inSpanish and in English in
oral contexts.
2) Formulate and
demonstrate hypotheses
through textual analysis andeffective use of relevant
sources in the field, such as
professional journals,specialized books, archives,
systems and technologies of
information.
3) Analyze texts, taking into
account technical, formal,historical and thematic
Activities:
a) Oral
Presentation of a
Critical Essay(summary and
commentary)
b) Oral
Presentation ofFinal Research
Project
Instruments:
a) Rubric to assesseffective oral
communication in
oral presentationswill be used to
assess student oral
communication
skills in an oral
presentation of acritical essay and
The criteria to be
evaluated, as
expressed in the
rubric, are thefollowing:
1) Communicate the
presentations main
argument effectively.2) Communicate
content effectively on
a more general level,
throughout the
presentation.3) Organize ideas and
arguments effectively
in the presentation.4) Utilize various
types of materials
(audio, visual, etc.) to
enhance performance.
5) Capture and holdthe audiences
75% or more of the
students will receive a
score of 4 or higher (in a 6
point rubric) in all criteria
LITE 3011
or other
preliminary
3--- levelcourse
LITE 3045
Introduction
to Compara-
tiveLiterature
or
LITE 3101
or LITE
3102
or
LITE 4---
Course ofdirected
selection
with a
required
finalresearch
LITE 4---
Course of
directed
selectionwith a
required
final
researchpaper
(in which
the students
write their
final thesispapers)
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
2/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives
Activities andinstruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
aspects. in the oralpresentation of the
final research
paper.
attention throughquality of voice, eye
contact, questions,
interaction, and/or byother means.6) Demonstrate
effective and
appropriate use of
language.
paper
EffectiveWritten
Communication
The students will
demonstrate effective writtencommunication (in Spanish
or English) in all of their
written work, taking intoaccount the following:
The student will be able to1) Communicate effectively,coherently and correctly in
Spanish and in English in
written contexts.
2) Formulate anddemonstrate hypotheses
through textual analysis and
effective use of relevant
sources in the field, such asprofessional journals,
specialized books, archives,
systems and technologies of
information.3) Analyze texts, taking into
Activities:
a) PreliminaryResearch Paper
Proposals
b) Final ResearchPapers
Instruments:a) Rubric to assess
effective
communication in
analytical writingwill be used to
assess student
writing skills in
the preliminaryresearch paper
proposal and in the
final research
paper.
The criteria to be
evaluated, asexpressed in the
rubric, are the
following:1) Communicate
effectively the mainargument (the thesisstatement) to be
developed in the
research paper.
2) Communicateeffectively, throughout
the research paper, the
arguments that support
the thesis statement.3) Communicate ideas
through the effective
use of language.
4) Demonstrate anacademic and accurate
75% or more of the
students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6
point rubric) in all criteria
LITE 3011
or otherpreliminary
3--- level
course
LITE 3045
Introductionto Compara-
tive
Literature
or
LITE 3101
or LITE
3102
or
LITE 4---
Course ofdirected
selection
with a
requiredfinal
LITE 4---
Course ofdirected
selection
with arequired
finalresearchpaper
(in which
the students
write theirfinal thesis
papers)
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
3/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives
Activities andinstruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
account technical, formal,historical and thematic
aspects.
4) Utilize correctly theconventional format relevantto the discipline for the
documentation of
bibliographical sources (i.e.
MLA format).
use of language.5) Demonstrate an
accurate and
appropriate use ofvocabulary.6) Communicate
effectively through the
accurate use of
grammar.7) Communicate well
through the effective
organization, format,
and presentation of thearguments.
8) Utilize correctly the
conventional format
relevant to thediscipline for the
documentation of
bibliographical
sources (i.e. MLA
format).
researchpaper
Critical Thinking
The student will be able to
1) Analyze texts, taking into
account technical, formal,
historical and thematicaspects.
2) Formulate and
demonstrate hypotheses
through textual analysis andeffective use of relevant
Activities:
a) Final
Exam/Paper
Instruments:
a) Rubric to assess
critical thinking
will be used toassess student
The criteria to be
evaluated, as
expressed in the
rubric, are thefollowing:
1) Formulate an
appropriate hypothesis
(the problem, questionor main argument to
75% or more of the
students will receive a
score of 4 or higher (in a 6
point rubric) in all criteria
LITE 3011
or other
preliminary
3--- levelcourse
LITE 3101
(Literary
Theory)
or LITE3102
or LITE
3045
LITE 4---
Course of
directed
selectionwith a
required
final
researchpaper
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
4/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives
Activities andinstruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
sources in the field, such asprofessional journals,
specialized books, archives,
systems and technologies ofinformation.3) Critique texts according to
the adaptation and
application of relevant
theoretical frameworks,above all those that have
shaped and defined the field
of literary studies and its
relationships to otherdiscourses and cultural
manifestations.
4) Distinguish literary
movements, ranging fromAntiquity to Post-modernity,
as well as their relationships
to other cultural discourses.
5) Present and develop a
relevant positioning orperspective, in dialogue with
other relevant perspectives in
the field.6) Elaborate conclusions
corresponding to the
arguments developed and
evidence presented in the
paper.7) Communicate effectively,
critical thinkingskills in final exam
paper.
be developed ordemonstrated)
2) Contextualize the
hypothesis.3) Make explicit thepremises relevant for
the analysis.
4) Present, develop
and communicate ahypothesis that reflects
a perspective or
positioning in dialogue
or debate with otherrelevant perspectives.
5) Present, analyze
and utilize effectively
theinformation/evidence
(textual or other).
6) Elaborate
conclusions
corresponding to thearguments developed
and evidence
presented in the paper.7) Communicate
effectively, coherently
and correctly.
8) Critique texts
according to thealteration and
or
LITE 4---
Course ofdirectedselection
with a
required
finalresearch
paper
(in whichthe students
write their
final thesispapers)
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
5/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives
Activities andinstruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
coherently and correctly inSpanish and in English in
oral and written contexts.
application of relevanttheoretical
frameworks.
Research and
Creation
The student will be able to:1) Utilize, appropriately and
effectively, sources of
information, both in print
form and on-line (i.e. LibraryCatalogues, Electronic
Databases, etc.)
2) Select relevant
information, in terms of bothquantity and quality, to
develop effectively the topic
of research.3) Formulate and
demonstrate hypothesesthrough textual analysis andeffective use of relevant
sources in the field, such as
professional journals,
specialized books, archives,systems and technologies of
information.
4) Analyze texts, taking into
account technical, formal,historical and thematic
aspects.
5) Present and develop a
relevant positioning orperspective, in dialogue with
Activities:a) Final Research
Papers
Instruments:a) Rubric to assess
research in an
analytical research
paper will be usedto assess effective
research skills in
the final researchpaper.
The criteria to beevaluated, as
expressed in the
rubric, are the
following:1) Utilize,
appropriately and
effectively, sources of
information, both inprint form and on-line
(i.e. Library
Catalogues, ElectronicDatabases, etc.)
2) Select relevantinformation, in termsof both quantity and
quality, to develop
effectively the topic of
research.3) Formulate an
appropriate hypothesis
(the problem, question
or main argument tobe developed or
demonstrated)
4) Contextualize the
hypothesis.5) Make explicit the
75% or more of thestudents will receive a
score of 4 or higher (in a 6
point rubric) in all criteria
----------- LITE 3045Introduction
to Compara-
tive
Literature
or
LITE 4---Course of
directed
selectionwith a
requiredfinalresearch
paper
LITE 4---Course of
directed
selection
with arequired
final
research
paper(in which
the students
write theirfinal thesis
papers)
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
6/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives
Activities andinstruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
other relevant perspectives inthe field.
6) Elaborate conclusions
corresponding to thearguments developed andevidence presented in the
paper.
7) Communicate effectively,
coherently and correctly inSpanish and in English in
oral and written contexts.
8) Utilize correctly the
conventional format relevantto the discipline for the
documentation of
bibliographical sources (i.e.
MLA format).
premises relevant forthe analysis.
6) Present, develop
and communicate ahypothesis that reflectsa perspective or
positioning in dialogue
or debate with other
relevant perspectives.7) Present, analyze
and utilize effectively
the
information/evidence(textual or other).
8) Elaborate
conclusions
corresponding to thearguments developed
and evidence
presented in the paper.
9) Communicate
effectively, coherentlyand correctly.
10) Critique texts
according to thealteration and
application of relevant
theoretical
frameworks.
11) Utilize correctlythe conventional
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
7/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives
Activities andinstruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
format relevant to thediscipline for the
documentation of
bibliographicalsources (i.e. MLAformat).
InformationLiteracy
The student will be able to:
1) Utilize, appropriately andeffectively, sources of
information, both in print
form and on-line (i.e. Library
Catalogues, ElectronicDatabases, etc.)
2) Select relevant
information, in terms of bothquantity and quality, to
develop effectively the topicof research.3) Formulate and
demonstrate hypotheses
through textual analysis and
effective use of relevantsources in the field, such as
professional journals,
specialized books, archives,
systems and technologies ofinformation.
4) Utilize correctly the
conventional format relevant
to the discipline for thedocumentation of
Activities:
a) PreliminaryResearch Paper
Proposals
b) Final Research
Papers
Instruments:
a) Rubric to assessInformation
Literacy inresearch for aresearch paper will
be used to assess
student
informationliteracy in the
preliminary
research paper
proposal and in thefinal research
paper.
The criteria to be
evaluated, asexpressed in the
rubric, are the
following:
1) Utilize,appropriately and
effectively, sources of
information, both inprint form and on-line
(i.e. LibraryCatalogues, ElectronicDatabases, etc.)
2) Select relevant
information, in terms
of both quantity andquality, to develop
effectively the topic of
research.
3) Utilize correctly theconventional format
relevant to the
discipline for the
documentation ofbibliographical
75% or more of the
students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6
point rubric) in all criteria
--------- LITE 3045
Introductionto Compara-
tive
Literature
or
LITE 4---Course of
directedselectionwith a
required
final
researchpaper
LITE 4---
Course ofdirected
selection
with a
requiredfinal
research
paper(in which
the studentswrite theirfinal thesis
papers)
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
8/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
CampusMission Domains Student Learning Objectives
Activities andinstruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
bibliographical sources (i.e.MLA format).
sources (i.e. MLAformat).
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
9/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICORO PIEDRAS CAMPUS
PLAN OF ASSESSMENT STUDENT LEARNING
PART IIKNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, OR ATTITUDES OF THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM OR MAJOR
Academic Program or Major: _______________________________________________________ Academi
Knowledge,Skills
or Attitudes of theAcademic Program
or Major
Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect information
First timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
Knowledge (andApplication of
Knowledge) of
Literary Periods,
Movements,Genres, and
Theories
The student will be able to
1) Distinguish literarymovements, ranging from
Antiquity to Post-modernity,
as well as their relationships
to other cultural discourses.2) Recognize theoretical
schools that have shaped and
defined the field of literary
studies and its relationships
to other discourses andcultural manifestations.
3) Critique texts according to
the adaptation and
application of relevanttheoretical frameworks,
above all those that have
shaped and defined the field
of literary studies and itsrelationships to other
Activities:
a) Exams,discussion type
Instruments:
a) Rubric to assessknowledge and
application of
literary periods
and movements
The criteria to be
evaluated, asexpressed in the
rubric:
1) Conocer los
diferentes contextoshistricos en los
cuales se desarrollan
los movimientos
literarios o tericos
bajo estudio.2) Relacionar los
movimientos literarios
o tericos bajo estudio
con otras expresionesculturales de la poca
(filosofa, arte,
ciencia, msica,
religin, entre otros).
3) Comprender las
75% or more of the
students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6
point rubric) in all criteria
LITE 3011
or otherpreliminary
3--- level
course
LITE 3101
or LITE3102
or
LITE 4---
Course of
directed
selection
with arequired
final
research
paper
LITE 4---
Course ofdirected
selection
with a
requiredfinal
research
paper
(in which
the studentswrite their
final thesis
papers)
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
10/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
Knowledge,Skills
or Attitudes of theAcademic Program
or Major
Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect information
First timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
discourses and cultural
manifestations.
4) Analyze texts, taking into
account technical, formal,historical and thematic
aspects.
relaciones de
continuidad y
discontinuidad entre
un movimientoliterario o terico y los
de otras pocas.
4) Definir con
precisin losconceptos temticos
claves de un
movimiento literario,
cultural o terico.5) Definir con
precisin los discursos
retricos, tericos o
gneros literarios queson empleados en su
objeto de estudio.
6) Identificar a qu
movimiento literario,
cultural o tericopertenece un texto,
ensayo terico o
expresin cultural.
7) Identificar lostemas tpicos de un
movimiento literario,
cultural o terico en
un objeto de estudioparticular.
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
11/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
Knowledge,Skills
or Attitudes of theAcademic Program
or Major
Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect information
First timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
8) Aplicar conceptos
temticos claves de un
movimiento literario,
cultural o terico en suanlisis.
9) Aplicar
correctamente su
conocimiento dediscursos retricos,
tericos o gneros
literarios como parte
de su anlisis.10) Cuestionar,
redefinir o ampliar el
repertorio temtico de
un movimientoliterario, cultural o
terico a partir de su
propio anlisis del
objeto bajo estudio.
11) Cuestionar,redefinir o ampliar el
repertorio de discursos
retricos, tericos o de
gneros de unmovimiento literario,
cultural o terico a
partir de su propio
anlisis del objeto bajoestudio.
8/2/2019 Literatura Comparada Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012)
12/12
Assessment Coordinator: ___Dra. Marian Polhill_________ Department Chair: ___Dr. Rubn Ros_____________ Date submitted: _Nov. 22, 20
Knowledge,Skills
or Attitudes of theAcademic Program
or Major
Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect information
First timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree