DAVID E . CHRISTIANSON

R.R. 14 DOQ LAKE ROAD THUNDER BAY ONTARIO P7B 5E5 PHONE 767--467O

52E16SW8823 Z . 7709 HAYCOCK 010

TECHNICAL REPORT

"GEOPHYSICAL"

LINCOLN RESOURCES INC.MAGNETOMETER SURVEY on CLAIM NO. 59O724

- HAYCOCK TWP. KENORA MINING DIVISION

CONTOUR INTERVAL* IOOgammas

- - - - CLAIM LINE

INSTRUMENT* GEONICS G 0/6 OPERA TOR' D. E.G.

VTS. 52EI6SW DATE:OCTJ9B4 DRWN: CHRISTIANSON 3 c ALE: i "-106

PROSPECTING SERVICES

page i

LOCATION and ACCESS...SURVEY AREA

UNPATENTED MINING CLAIM NO. K 590?24 IS LOCATED IN

HAYCOCK TWP. PLAN M 198?. KENORA MINING DIVISION.

ACCESS TO THE CLAIM IS BY ALL-WEATHER ROAD FROM KENORA

TO THE NORTHWEST CONCRETE GRAVEL QUARRY VIA THE "JONES

ROAD" . DISTANCE FROM KENORA BY ROAD IS APPROX. 12 MILES.

THREE LOCATION SKETCHES ARE ATTACHED.....

LOCATION SKETCH A = GENERAL KENORA/PROPERTY LOCATION

B = DETAILED CLAIM LOCATION l"=l/2 MILE

C = LOCATION SWEDEN OCCURRENCE/CLAIM 590?24

LOCATION SKETCH.....A

GENERAL.

LOCATION SKETCH.....B

CLAIM LOCATION

Margach (east) l

LOCATION SKETCH....C

SWEDEN...

^«.SSL

page one

CLAIM NUMBER COVERED BY SURVEY: K 590?24

CLAIM HOLDERS; JOHN KARWACKI GREG CLARKP.O. BOX 595 201 MELLICK AVE.,KENORA, ONT., KENORA, ONT. ,P9N 3X5 P9N 3C6

OPTIONOR; GLE RESOURCES LTD./ LINCOLN RESOURCES INC.500-67 Richmond St. w., Toronto, Ont., M5H 1Z5 Lie. T 829

GRID INFORMATION;

A FORMAL PICKET LINE GRID CONSISTING OF ONE BASE LINE

(CENTRAL) and FOUR WING LINES 0+00 thru 9+OOE (300 1 spacing).

LINES WERE CHAINED TO 50' STATIONS.

* THE GRID WAS ESTABLISHED BY G. CLARK AND USED TO PERFORM

AN EM 16 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY IN DECEMBER, 1983.

DATE OF SURVEYt October 28, 1984

INSTRUMENT USED; GEOMETRICS PROTON MAGNETOMETER MODEL G-816

SENSITIVITY; +1 gamma

INSTRUMENT OPERATOR; DAVID E. CHRISTIANSON

METHOD OF SURVEY;

THE STANDARD MAGNETOMETER SURVEYING TECHNIQUE WAS

EMPLOYED. READINGS WERE TAKEN EVERY 50' ALONG PICKET LINES.

THE BASE LINE WAS READ IN BOTH LINES OF TRAVEL AND

READINGS WERE USED FOR A DIURNAL CHECK.

DIURNAL CORRECTIONS TO READINGS WERE NOT DEEMED

NECESSARY DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE ENTIRE SURVEY TOOK

LESS THAN 1 1/2 HOURS, AND MAXIMUM GAIN IN BASE LINE VALUES

WAS ONLY 3 gammas.

TOTAL NUMBER OF STATIONS; 99

page one-a

PREVIOUS WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE GRID AREA:

1) GEOPHYSICAL REPORT ON CLAIM 590724, HAYCOCK TWP., KENORA MINING DIVISION.-G. CLARK, December, 1983

2) GEOCHEMICAL REPORT ON CLAIMS 5900^9, 590723, 590724, HAYCOCK TWP., KENORA MINING DIVISION.- G. CLARK, August

-NUMEROUS STRIPPINGS AND SURFACE TRENCHES-

page two

GENERAL GEOLOGYi

GENERAL GEOLOGYThe map area is underlain by rocks of Precambrian age which form 2 ge ological subprovinces within Superior Province of the Canadian Shield. Metavolcanics and metasediments of the Wabigoon (Keewatin) Subpro- vince outcrop in a northeast-trending wedge extending from Lake of the Woods into Pettypiece Township. North of this wedge are gneissic grani toid rocks of the English River Subprovince. Although the origin of the gneissic assemblage is problematical, it is suggested that they may have formed from pre-existing felsic volcanic/sedimentary rocks having a minor mafic component. These rocks have been subjected to several periods of penetrative deformation and have been partially assimilated by later sodic and potassic granitoid intrusions over a long period of time.

.MARGINAL NOTESOGS, GEOLOGICAL SERIES-PRELIMINARY MAP

P.2617

KENORA-KEEWATIN AREA WESTERN PART ...KING , H.L. 1983-

PURPOSE OF SURVEY; page three

GEOPHYSICAL REPORT ON CLAIM 59072^ (EM-16)

HAYCOCK TOWNSHIP

KENORA MINING DIVISION

.....G. CLARK, Dec. 1983

( MNR ASSESSMENT WORK FILES )

. ...CONCLUDED THAT....

"The EM-16 survey did not indicate the presence of the mineralization shear zone located along the base line. Therefore a magnetometer survey is re quired to further assess the potential of the anomalous zones which were undercovered and hope fully to delineate the shear zone."

THIS SURVERY WAS PERFORMED TO SATISFY THE NEED SUGGESTED

BY CLARK.

RESULTS

THE RESULTANT MAG. DATA HAS BEEN PLOTTED ON THE GEOPHYSICAL

PLAN ATTACHED IN POCKET.

THE SCALE OF THIS PLAN IS LARGE ENOUGH TO NICELY EXPRESS

THE 100 gamma INTERVAL CONTOURS. (1"= 100') AND WAS

PREPARED TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE CLARK EM -16 PLAN.

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SEVERAL LOCAL ZONES OF"MAGNETIC

DEPRESSION"?, MAGNETIC ACTIVITY APPEARS TO BE WEAK IN

GENERAL.

IT DOES SEEM POSSIBLE THAT THE MAGNETIC ACTIVITY

NOTED IN THE VICINITY OF THE "SWEDEN SHAFT" COULD BE

GIVING STRUCTURAL INFO. AND SHOWING THE "SHEAR ZONE"

AS NOTICED ON THE SURFACE OCROP.

page four

CONCLUSIONS;

IT APPEARS THAT THE SURVEY MAY HAVE MET ITS PRIMARY

OBJECTIVE TO DELINEATE SOME STRUCTURE HOWEVER: ANY

STRUCTURE THAT MAY BE DELINEATED SEEMS TO BE TOO SMALL

TO BE CONSIDERED ON ITS OWN.

RECOMMENDATIONS;

IT IS THIS WRITERS OPINION THAT NO .ATTEMPT SHOULD BE

MADE TO DRAW ANY POSITIVE CONCLUSIONS FROM THIS SURVEY

OR FROM THE CLARK EM-16 SURVEY RATHER; THIS INFORMATION

BE ADDED TO THE GEOPHYSICAL REPORT "RESULTS OF MAGNETIC

SURVEY, HAYCOCK TWP., CLAIMS (CLARK OPTION), KENORA, ONTARIO"

AS PREPARED AND INTERPRETED BY J.B. BONIWELL, EXPLORATION

GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANT, OCTOBER 25, 1984., AND SIMILAR

FOLLOW-UP WORK BE CONSIDERED.

IN ANY EVENT IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THE NEXT PHASE

OF DEVELOPMENT SHOULD WITHOUT DOUBT INCLUDE DETAILED

GEOLOGIC MAPPING AND SAMPLING OF THE NUMEROUS OUTCROPPINGS

WITHIN THE SURVEY AREA.

page five

AUTHOR'S CERTIFICATE and STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, DAVID E. CHRISTIANSON OF THE CITY OF THUNDER BAY DO HEREBY DECLARE:

1) THAT I RESIDE AT R.R. 1^, DOG LAKE RD.,THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO. P?B 5E5

2) THAT I HAVE A PERSONAL AND INTIMATE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE REPORT, HAVING PERFORMED THE FIELD WORK AND WRITTEN THE REPORT.

3) THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SUBMIT THIS REPORT BY EXPERIENCE AND PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES.

DAVID E. CHRISTIANSONPROSPECTOR.21.01.85

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

2.7799 HAYCOCK 300

File No J 7 7c7

TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

'i/! ~-i-rr

/ 7

Signature of A&sessor&se

Date

01 00Report of Work(Gropfiys'cal, Geolcxjicsl, Geoctipniical ant) Expendilutps)

,• ? /•-

Instructions -

Note

. - _ir-nti- typ'1 f" P"n1 rf &{ 3 *\. ^

Mining Act

If nnmh'-r of minmu rlpin

pxrnrdt. 5l)nro on 1 rm iiirrn,

O"lv (l'-«v- rrpthu cnlciiip "t icppncliUir*1 '-" section m^v in th»- "txprnif Day^ Ci

Do not u&f ghaifpd aiea* bpio

I"1 pnirr " column

1 rnvmhtp o' Af P,T

HAYCOCK TP.M1987]PrOipCCt()r'fc L -rPMfP N

t VI 1 *' r»1 Si*' vpy I t- '

GEOPHYSICAL. . . .MAGNETOMETERClnim Hnlrlp'lti

H.G. CLARK-H11405 , J. KARWACKI Sr.-H11585 ... . .1... .. .. .Anmpv-

c/o GLE RESOURCES LTD. -500-6? Richmond St. W. , Toronto, Ont. M5H 1Z5Stj-vrv Cornpflny

GLE RESOURCES LTD.Namr and Address o* A uthor (of Gen Technical report)

DAVID E. CHRISTIANSON R.R. 14 Dog Lake Rd . , Thunder Bay, Ont. P?B 5E5

I Da IP o* Suivcv M Milpi O' linii Cul

Oertits Requested per Each Claim m Columns at right Mining Claims Iraveisori (List in mimpiical sequence)

For first survey

Enter 40 days (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey usmp the same grid

Enter 20 days (for each)

Geophysical !

Electromagnetic '

Ma0netomete r '

r- Radiometnc

Othe- i

Day' pe'Clam.

20

1 Geological

Geochemical

Man Days

Complete reverse sidt

and enter totaKsl here

Geophysica 1

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Days perClaim

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions I Electromagnetic

credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys. | Magnetometer

iI Radiomernc

Days perClaim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

Instructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mimrif)

K I 590?24

RECEIVED

NOV 0 6

MINING LANDS

Lxpenu, Days CV

1984

stUTUI

txpenri 1 D,iv*

Dale

31 .10.84Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Total number of mining claims covered by this report O 1* work.

For Office Use Onlyi MI iinjju i?i I P in 1 riMi iiniFJ«TTr3~ed /Til

bate Approved as Recorded Branch Directo

I hereby certify that I have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

• CHRISTIANSON, R.R. 14, Dog Lake Rd. . Thunder Bay. Ont. PTg, 5E5Date Certified

31.10.841362 (81/9)

2 O ws1b. O

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File. I

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) GEOPHYSICAL - MAGNETOMETER

Township or Ar.a HAYCOCK TOWNSHIP_______ Claim HnlHer( s) JOHN KARWACKI & GREG CLARK

optioned to LINCOLN RESOURCES Inc. Survey nr.mp.ny DAVID E. CHRISTIANSON ___________ Author of Report DAVID E. CHRISTIANSON ________ Address of Author^ R» !**• D°g Lake Rd.. Thunder Bay,

Covering Dates of Sn^ O ct 2?/84 t Jan. 21/85

Total Miles of Line r.i.t ^900(linecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer_—Radiometric——

—Other_______

DAYS per claim.

20

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

HATR. 21.01.85

(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications .~l*i 73

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

K 590724(prefix) (number)

TOTAL CLAIMS-ONE

u

i

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS *— If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

~l

Number of Stations Station interval __

Profile scale ———— Contour ii

9950'

.Number of ReadingsJLine spacing.

300'99

Instrument. GEOMETRICS PROTON MAGNETOMETER MODEL G- 816

Accuracy -Scale constant - 1 gamma

Diurnal correction not necessarywithin 1.5 hrs.Base Station check-in interval (hours)_

Base Station location and value Base line read both directions and tied in,- maximum 3 gamma gain noticed from start to finish.

c

c

1

InstrumentCoil configuration Coil separation __ Accuracy _____ Method: Frequency_____

Parameters measured.

CD Fixed transmitter CH Shoot back CD In line Parallel line

(specify V.L.F. station)

So

InstrumentScale constant __ Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

on

Instrument __________ Method CU Time Domain Parameters — On time ___

- Off time

I I Frequency Domain _ Frequency _____ _ Range ________

— Delay time ___— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing. Type of electrode

1985 04 12Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources808 Robertson StreetBox 5080Kenora, OntarioP9N 3X9

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Magnetometer) Survey onMining Claim K 590724 1n Haycock Township

Your File: Our File:

252-84 2.7709

The Geophysical (Magnetometer) Survey assessment work credits as shown on the attached statement have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

lining

S.E. YundtD1rectorLand Management Branch

Uhltney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

D. Isherwood:mc

cc: H.G. ClarkJ. Karwackl Src/o GLE Resources LtdSuite 50067 Richmond Street NestToronto, OntarioM5H 1Z5

cc: David E. ChristlansonR.R.14Dog Lake RoadThunder Bay, OntarioP7B 5E5

Encl.

cc: Resident Geologist Kfenora, Ontario

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining i Lands Commissioner

Toronto, Ontario

© Ministry of Technical Assess) Natural ... , _ ... R^ources Work Credits

Ontario

merit ™ *2 7 ?nQ

Date Mining Recorder's Report ofAMENDED 1 9g5 Q4 u "-r"lho. 2 52_84

Recorded Holder

Hr ri l\ov 1 IfADUAPIfT <sD,ownsn, P or«re a -G. CLARK. J. KARVJACK.1 «>K. ——————————————————————————————————————————————

HAYCOCK TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Other - days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Attested" column

Genlngiral days

Geoohpmical .... davs

Man days CS Airborne O

Special provision CD Ground 03

l~l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

LJ Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

K 590724

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

I _ I not sufficiently covered by the survey I _ I Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

tario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

•1985 02 18 Your File: 252-84 Our File: 2.7709

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources808 Robertson StreetBox 5080Kenora, OntarioP9N 3X9

Dear Madam:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

rs sincerely,

ctor Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

iD. Isherwood:mc

Ends.

cc: H.G. Clark& J. Karwacki c/o GLE Resources Suite 50067 Richmond Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 1Z5

cc: David E. Christianson R.R.#14, Dog Lake Rd Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5E5

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining & Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

845

Ministry otNaturalResources

Ontario

AssessmentWorkBreakdown RESUBMISSION re. FILE # 2.7709/252/8^

1. Type of Survey ..GEOPHYSICAL.__(MAG_NETp_METER_)__._._._...._._..

2. Township or Area .....HAYCOCK_TOWNSHIP__-__KEN_0_RA______________

3. Numbers of Mining Claims Traversed by Survey ________•';_-___?/_____-

-14. Number of Miles of Line Cut

*5. Number of Stations Established -

*6. Make and type of Instrument Used

'*7. Scale Constant or Sensitivity .t/T.A.f?™!?1

*8. Frequency Used and Power Output _______.___.

Flown 0

9. Summary of Assessment Credits (details on reverse side)

Total 8 hour Technical Days (Include Consultants, Draughting ecc.)

Total 8 hour Line-Cutting Days ___________________

Calculation

x 7 21 21 21Technical Line-cutting Number

of claimsAssessment credits

per claim

The dates listed on this form represent working time spent entirely within the limitsof the above listed claims PH CheckIf otherwise, please explain _________________________________________________________

Dated: Signed:

Note: (A) * Complete only if applicable.(B) Complete list of names, addresses a~rul f̂Ai^fQffn r everse side.(C) Submit separate breakdown for each type of survey.(D) Submit in duplicate.

Details of Assessment Work Breakdown

FIELD WORK

Type of Work Name & Address Dates WorkedNumber of 8 hour days

LOCATING STATIONS and 9??°^?r 2 8 '

OPERATING INSTRUMENT, DAVID E. CHRISTIANSON ,R.R. 14, Thund_er Ea.f 1

CONSULTANTS' Number of

Name & Address Dates Worked (specify In'field or office) 8 hour days

DRAUGHTSMAN. TYPING. OTHERS (specify)Number of

Name & Address Type of Work Dates Worked 8 hour daysOctober 30/84 & January 21/85

David E. Christianson, Draughting,Typing, Reporting and Research 2

TOTAL 8 HOUR TECHNICAL DAYS 3

LINE-CUTTINGNumber of

Name Address Dates Worked 8 hour days

TOTAL 8 HOUR LINE-CUTTING DAYS

Ministryof Notice of IntentNaturalResources for Technical Reports

Ontario

1985 02 18 2.7709/252/84

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82/5)

© Ministry of Technical Assess Natural ... Rp-^urces Work Credits

Ontario

ment File2.7709

Date Mining Recorder's Report of1985 02 18 worktJo. 252_84

Recorded Holder

H.6. CLARK. J. KARWACKI SR.Township or Area

HAYf.nf.K, TnUNSHTP

Type ol survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

IVlgnfTOmotor 10 flays

jnriucerl polarisation rtays

Section 77 (19) S«« "Mining Claims AstesMd" column

Hpnlngiral Hays

fienrhemiral days

Man days CH Airborne CD

Special provision t_j Ground LJ

H Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

EH Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

K 590724

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

I _ I not sufficiently covered by the survey I _ I Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological—40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

REGISTERED

January 14. 1985 Report of Mork 252-84

H.G. Clark t J. Karwacklc/o GLE ResourcesSuite 50067 Richmond Street WestToronto, OntarioN5H 1Z5

Dear Sirs:

Enclosed 1s a copy of a Report of Mork for Magnetometer assessment work credits that was recorded by the recorder on November 1. 1984 on Mining Claim K 590724 1n the Township of Haycock.

Me have no record that you provide the full reports and naps to the Minister within the sixty day period provided by Section 77 of the Mining Act.

Unless you can provide the evidence by January 24, 1985 that the reports and maps were submitted as required, the mining recorder will be directed to cancel the work credits recorded on November 1, 1984.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitnay Block, Room 6643 queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1M3 Phone:(416)965-4888

A. Barnmc

cc: David E. Christlanson cc: Mining Recorder R.R.I14, Dog Lake Rd Kenor*. Ontario Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5E5

End.

s sI? §8•tilsia.i(9

\

No

rth A

stronomic

3^i1*^*.4^

N

SO. V/

ja *nSi

ai2

s»;£

.ntlci

2

i• t :

* ^

I s*-5*̂5*

>^?S:V-S*

$*>

**

- It1

^ M "t

*s.s^S^> ^v>5«|«. N

«

Order of" the Minister Resources

OntarioThe Mining Act

Room 6450, Whitney Block Queen't Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 416/965-1380

In the matter of mining claims:

K 590724

in the Township of Haycook

On consideration of an application from the recorded holder, H .G. Clark & J.Karwacki Sr.

under Section 77 Subsection 22 of The M ining Act, I hereby order that the time for filing reports and plans in support of Geophysical (Magnetometer)_____________assessment work recorded on November 1, ig R4 be extended until and including January 25. 19 85 .

January 29. 1985.

Copies:

Date

H.G. Clark & J. Karwackic/o 6.I.E. ResourcesSuite 50067 Richmond Street WestToronto, OntarioM5H 1Z5

of Director, Land Management Branch

David E. Christianson R.R. #14 Dog Lake Road Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5E5

Mining REcorderKenoraFile #252-84

1333(82/1)ft-

TRIM LINE.

•"''' '?£ I ' • >vc -^'ii: \,',

.«* * • i*"it"- u,

<•,,' »1» ••^Cl /''l'

Jt^A ^ v^T>

WF ' . ;

<*HN

k*.>Jt

'i^ I "

,-> .rf '»

<-SS

M*tl

-»;*;;'

-•''' fe ''' f vi

^ ., ^;' ''

^

t *

i,. a" 1 t

PETTY PI ECE

BLACK STURGEON

McDonald

^90049

639142 |639UJ |6e8O5<3? \

r..__ i i—~" -r i j 5fflrT7i^ ""l— V 'T~ H

;> --H" '

K I R K U P

THE TOWNSHIP OF

HAYCOCKDISTRICT OF

KENORA

KENORAMINING DIVISION

SCALE:UINCK-~46 CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDL lCENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYS

RAILWAYS

POWER LINES

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

CANCELLEDPF'JMIT

7

c.

NOTES400' Reserve around oil k*l • 8k I and* 8 Forests

to Uepl. of

Surface Signts withdrawn from stak.ng Sub. 34 Sec (d) Mg. Act ^hown thus *,<_«_.* F»lei63473

f- -

flo

\.r from-r-n A' f _ R s 0 (970

Ocit*

*>»<tion

17/10/73 SR8MR

PLAN NO M -I9B7

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES\I'I|,N., BRANCH

RIM LINE

o>00 V-

52fl6S*«>e>23 2 7789 HAYCOCK 200

K 590724

LINCOLN RESOURCES INC./. L"'Li . '<!/. "*/'// t ' f • G / "'./.>-.//*•. / / f . . ,*T / . f

- HASCOCK T #P. KENCKA toIN:t:<l [ VfJ/Ofi

CONTOUR INTERVAL* l OOgammas

- - - - CLAIM L ltJE

52 L-ATl . C c f.,'

' C.

K K 590724

K 590723

- SOON

- 700 N

- SOON

- SOON

- 400 N

300 N

200 N

-100N/

/ /

•100 S

- 200S

-300S

-/.DOS

-500b

- 600S

700S

-500 S

- 900S

-1000S

-1100 S

/

Ooo o

o o en

S2EI6SWM23 a.7709 HAYCOCK 210