21
Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity J. C. Sprott Department of Physics University of Wisconsin - Madison Presented to the Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Sciences in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on August 1, 2014

Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

  • Upload
    ula

  • View
    46

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity. J. C. Sprott Department of Physics University of Wisconsin - Madison Presented to the Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Sciences in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on August 1, 2014. Goals. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

J. C. SprottDepartment of Physics

University of Wisconsin - Madison

Presented to the

Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Sciences

in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

on August 1, 2014

Page 2: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Goals Describe a framework for

categorizing the different approaches researchers have taken to understanding the world

Make some general observations about the prospects and limitations of these methods

Share some of my personal views about the future of humanity

Page 3: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Models Either explicitly or implicitly, most people

are trying to understand the world by making models.

A model is a simplified description of a complicated process (ideally amenable to mathematical analysis).

“All models are wrong, but some are useful.” – George Box

The usefulness of a model may not relate to how realistic it is.

Page 4: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Agents Person Society Industry Organism Neuron Atom …

Inputs(stimulus)

Outputs(response)

Cause Effect

• Experiments

• Observations

• Reductionism

Facts versus Theory

Page 5: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Nonstationarity

Keep all inputs constant

Why?• Transient (memory)• Inputs not kept sufficiently constant• Unidentified inputs• Noise or measurement errors• Internal dynamics

y = f(x)

x y

Page 6: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Linearity means the response is proportional to the stimulus:

Linearity

What linearity is not:

x y = kx

A chain of causalityx1

x2

y = k1x1+k2x2

Page 7: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Why Linear Models? Simple – a good starting point

Most things are linear if x (and hence y) are sufficiently small

Linear systems can be solved exactly and unambiguously for any number of agents

Page 8: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Feedback

Time-varying dynamics can occur even in linear systems because of the inevitable time delay around the loop.

The feedback can be either positive (reinforcing) or negative (inhibiting).

y(t)

And it can be indirect through other agents (a loop of causality):

Cause Effect

Page 9: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Actually, the above behaviors are rarely seen (especially unlimited growth) because nature is not linear.

(Can also have homeostasis and steady oscillations, but these occur with zero probability - they are “non-generic”.)

Linear DynamicsOnly four things can happen in a linearsystem, no matter how complicated:Negative feedback:• Exponential decay

• Decaying oscillation

Positive feedback:• Exponential growth

• Growing oscillation

Page 10: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Nonlinearities

x

yy = kx

(Linear)

y = -kx (Linear)

diminishing returns

economy of scale

hormesis

What doesn’t kill you strengthens you.

cf: homeopathy

(common)

(uncommon)

Page 11: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Nonlinear DynamicsNonlinear agents with feedback loops

• All four linear behaviors

• Multiple stable equilibria

• Stable periodic cycles

• Quasiperiodicity

• Bifurcations (“tipping points”)

• Hysteresis (memory)

• Coexisting (hidden) attractors

• Chaos

• Hyperchaos

Page 12: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Of necessity, most scientists are studying a small part of a much larger network. This can lead to erroneous conclusions.

An alternative is to characterize the general behaviors of large nonlinear networks as was done for the nonlinear dynamics of simple systems.

Networks

Page 13: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Network DynamicsAn important distinction is dynamics ON the

network versus dynamics OF the network (and the two are usually concurrent and coupled).

Page 14: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Network Architectures• Random networks

• Sparse networks

• Near-neighbor networks

• Small-world networks

• Scale-free networks

1 2 3 4 5 …

1

2

3

4

5

• Cellular automata (discrete in s, t, v)

• Coupled map lattices (discrete in s, t)

• Systems of ODEs (discrete in s)

• Systems of PDEs (continuous in s, t, v)

Page 15: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Minimal Chaotic Networksx′′′= – ax′′+ x′ 2 – xSprott, PLA 228, 271 (1997)

x′′′= – ax′′ – x′ + |x| – 1Linz & Sprott, PLA 259, 240 (1999)

NL

N

L

L L

x′′

x′′

x′

x′

x

|x| – 1

x′ 2

Page 16: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Matrix Representation1 2 3

1 L N L

2 L 0 0

3 0 L 0

1 2 3

1 L L N

2 L 0 0

3 0 L 0

1 2 3

1 L L 0

2 N L N

3 N N L

Sprott(1997)

Linz & Sprott(1999)

Lorenz(1963)

Page 17: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Lorenz Systemx′= σ(y – x)y′= – xz + rx – yz′= xy – bzLorenz, JAS 20, 130 (1963)

N

L

N

x

y z

Page 18: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

• Complex ≠ complicated• Not real and imaginary parts• Not very well defined• Contains many interacting parts• Interactions are nonlinear• Contains feedback loops (+ and -)• Cause and effect are intermingled• Driven out of equilibrium• Evolves in time (not static)• Usually chaotic (perhaps weakly)• Can self-organize, adapt, learn

Complex SystemA network of many nonlinearly-interacting agents

Page 19: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Reasons for Optimism1. Negative feedback is common

2. Most nonlinearities are beneficial

3. Complex systems self-organize to optimize their fitness

4. Chaotic systems are sensitive to small changes

5. Our knowledge and technology will continue to advance

Page 20: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

Summary Nature is complicated

Things will change

“Prediction is very hard, especially

when it's about the future.” –Yogi

Berra

There will always be problems

Our every action changes the world

Page 21: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Chaos and Complexity

References http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu

/ lectures/lessons.ppt (this talk)

http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/Chaos-Complexity/sprott13.htm (condensed written version)

http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/chaostsa/ (my chaos textbook)

[email protected] (contact me)