39
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science December 9, 2010 A MSP Grant through KDE and Administered by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach Welcome!

LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

  • Upload
    duena

  • View
    36

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

LeaPS Learning in Physical Science. December 9, 2010. Welcome!. A MSP Grant through KDE and Administered by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach. Presentation Provided by the P-12 Math and Science Outreach Division of PIMSER. Project Goals for LeaPS. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

LeaPSLearning in Physical Science

December 9, 2010

A MSP Grant through KDE andAdministered by University of Kentucky

PIMSER Math and Science Outreach

Welcome!

Page 2: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Presentation Provided by the

P-12 Math and Science Outreach

Division of PIMSER

Page 3: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Project Goals for LeaPS

• Overall goal: Students will learn targeted physical science concepts (structure and transformation of matter, force & motion)

• Goal 1: Enhance teacher content and pedagogical knowledge of targeted physical science concepts

• Goal 2: Improve Teacher Instructional Practices • Goal 3: Enhance Administrator Support

Page 4: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Kit Development

• Why kits?• Development process• Learning progressions• Sample lesson• Sample test

Page 5: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

• “Research strongly suggests that a more effective approach to science learning and teaching is to teach and build on core concepts of science over a period of years rather than weeks or months.”– Ready, Set, Science! NRC, pg. 59

Page 6: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Some Benefits of Learning Progressions

• They require serious thinking about the underlying concepts that need to be developed before a student can master a particular area of science.

• They prompt educators to think about how topics are presented at each grade level so that they build on and support each other.

• They can draw on research about children’s learning in determining the scope and sequence of a curriculum.

• They can incorporate all four strands of scientific proficiency. (Understanding scientific explanations, generating scientific evidence, reflecting on scientific knowledge, participating productively in science)

• They engage students with meaningful questions and investigations of the natural world.

• They suggest the most appropriate ages for introduction of core concepts.

• They can suggest the most important tools and practices to assess understanding.

Page 7: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science
Page 8: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science
Page 9: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

• “The point is to emphasize the goal of understanding concepts, which is very different than merely memorizing vocabulary or definitions.”– Ready, Set, Science! pg. 65

Page 10: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Sample Lesson

• Examine the sample lesson– Layout– Thinking required– Literacy connections– Meaning making

• Comments and/or questions

Page 11: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Sample Test

• Pre and post-testing• Examine the sample test– Unit alignment– Balance for concepts– Conceptual focus– Student self-assessment

• Comments and/or questions

Page 12: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

• “This framework of competencies for school leaders is specific largely to the classroom level of assessment in a balanced system…First, standards-driven reform has created new knowledge requirements and responsibilities for school leaders…Assessing the standards, not just through large-scale accountability tests or even local short-cycle or common assessments, but day to day in the classroom where standards, instruction, and assessment are all pages in the same book, is a requirement for standards-based reform.”– An Action Guide for Leaders, pg. 97

Page 13: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Current Status of U.S. Educational Assessment System

Three Positives• Reduction of assessment

bias in large-scale tests• Research ratification of the

formative assessment process

• Increased advocacy of the formative assessment process

Four Negatives• Educator’s abysmal

assessment literacy• Uncritical adoption of

interim assessment system(s)

• Computer adapted testing’s seductive allure

• Instructionally insensitive accountability tests

James Popham, July 2010

Page 14: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

• “The second reason this leadership framework is focused largely on the classroom level of assessment is the reward in improved student learning brought about by the use of classroom assessment of learning. Described by Fullan (2004) as a ‘high-yield strategy,’ the research reported on the topic helps explain why leadership knowledge and skill specific to it are beneficial.”– An Action Guide for School Leaders, pg. 98

Page 15: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

15

Research consistently shows that regular, high-quality FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT increases student achievement.

Page 16: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

16

Black & Wiliam Research on Effects of Formative Assessment:

.4 to .7 Gain

.7 Standard Deviation Score Gain = 25 Percentile Points on ITBS (middle of score range) 70 SAT Score Points 4 ACT Score Points

Largest Gain for Low Achievers

Reprint of “Inside the Black Box” in September, 2010 Kappanhttp://www.kappanmagazine.org/content/92/1/81.full.pdf+html

Page 17: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Formative Assessment in Action

• Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students’ achievement of intended instructional outcomes.– FAST/SCASS Project of CCSSO

Page 18: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Five Attributes that Render FA Most Effective

• Learning Progression– Clearly articulated sub-goals of the ultimate learning goal

• Learning Goals and Criteria for Success• Descriptive Feedback– Evidenced based feedback that is linked to the

instructional outcomes and criteria for success• Self- and Peer- Assessment• Collaboration– Teachers and students are partners in learning.

Page 19: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Classroom VignettesExamples and Counter-examples of FA

• Individually, read vignette 5.• Determine if FA practices are present and

provide justification for your reasoning.• Discuss with an elbow partner.

Page 20: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Classroom VignettesExamples and Counter-examples of FA

• Number 1 – 4 at your table, if more than 4, keep numbering.

• Read the vignette that corresponds to your number.• Determine if FA practices are present or not and

justify your choice.• Starting with vignette 1, provide an overview of

your vignette, and share your justifications.• Compare your responses to the rationales provided

by the FAST/SCASS project through CCSSO.

Page 21: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Classroom VignettesFormative Assessment in Practice

• Read each vignette.• Analyze each vignette using the 5 attributes of

effective formative assessment.• Highlight where you see the attributes evidenced.• Provide a brief overview of your vignette and

indicate how it aligned with the five attributes.• As each table member shares, begin to look

across the vignettes and focus on ways one attribute appears across both vignettes.

Page 22: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

22

Balanced Assessment Goal of SB 1

SummativeProvides evidence achievement to certify student competence or program effectiveness

Assessment for learning

Use assessments to help students assess and adjust their own learning

Formative uses of summative dataUse of summative evidence to inform what comes next for individuals or groups of students

FormativeFormal and informal processes teachers and students use to gather evidence to directly improve the learning of students assessed

Assessment for learning

Use classroom assessments to inform teacher’s decisions

Page 23: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Research Study

• Shavelson, et. al., embedded formal formative assessments into a unit on buoyancy from a nationally recognized science curriculum (FAST)

• P-O-E tasks were built into conceptual hinge points in the lessons’ sequence called “reflective lessons,” which were designed to provide useful information to the teachers and students about students’ understanding of floating and sinking.

Page 24: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Research Study

• Teachers received PD about the curriculum and the “reflective lessons.”

• Lessons were videotaped.• Teachers were asked to hold class discussions during

the reflective lessons.• Discussions only took 27% of the time and were not

always right after the POE or short-answer tasks.• This was the problem – it was at this point the students

were to use FA information, but they were not given processing time.

Page 25: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Research Study

• Other student-centered parts of the FA became easily derailed.

• Teachers did use a variety of strategies for collecting student ideas and concepts.

• They did display the ideas.• Only a few of the teachers spent time

clustering the ideas, looking for patterns, or helping students make sense of the ideas.

Page 26: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Research Study

• Most of the time, teachers did not ask follow-up or “why” questions to ask students to express their reasoning.

• Most of the time, students did not back up their scientific claims with evidence.

• Most of the time (83%), when students were talking they were addressing the teacher rather than other students.

Page 27: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Research Study

• “…the notion that when it comes to significant learning it matters more what the student does than what the teacher does is a conceptual change that is difficult for most teachers to make at first.”

• “…we are talking about a complex change in culture – a change that will require effort over time.”

Page 28: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Research Study

• “The bottom line is that formative assessment is a learning process. It is not a prepackaged program with teachers manuals, lesson plans, worksheets, and other materials. It is not something that teachers must enact but, rather, something they must embrace. Although embracing significant conceptual change about what it means to teach and what we should count as evidence of learning is difficult, it is much more lasting than asking teachers to adopt the next educational trend or buzzword.”

Page 29: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Kit Management

• Logistics• Barriers• Support needed• Sustainability

Page 30: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Writing In Science

• Learning Targets:– I can explain the rationale for

using science notebooks as an instructional tool.

– I can identify ways that WinS can assist with the implementation of the science literacy standards.

Page 31: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Science Notebooks

• Is a science notebook different from a science journal or log?

• How have you science notebooks been used in the past?

Page 32: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Where is the trouble?

Does it lie with content

or with communication?

Page 33: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Five Big AssumptionsSeattle’s Science Notebook Program

• Students are motivated to learn new concepts and skills when they are engaged in meaningful learning experiences, such as those in inquiry-based science units.

• The ultimate goal is for students to develop an understanding of science concepts, and to do so, they must learn how to think scientifically

Page 34: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

…Assumptions (cont)

• Students also need to learn specific scientific skills (e.g., making observations and interpreting data) and forms of expository writing (e.g., data analysis and conclusions) to help them construct their understanding of concepts and develop their ability to think analytically. Science notebooks serve as a tool in this learning.

Page 35: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

…Assumptions (cont)

• Students need scaffolding and modeling to help them learn science concepts, scientific thinking and skills, and expository writing.

• Elementary students have limited time and energy for making entries in their science notebooks, so their entries should focus on expository writing that will deepen their conceptual understanding and/or develop their scientific skills and thinking.

Page 36: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Science Notebooks• The science notebook is not a product

that looks good, but it is a product to support learning and to develop expository writing skills.

• The science notebook is not about what students did, but it is about helping them to make meaning of what they did.

• Avoid having students write about how they felt, what was their favorite…,what they did, or a generic, “What did you learn today?”

• Notebooks should be for formative rather than summative purposes and, therefore, should not be graded.

Page 37: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Writing in Science:How to Scaffold Instruction to Support Learning

Science Session• Engagement

– Date and Focus Question• Active Investigation

– Record data, take notes, make illustrations or diagrams

• Shared Reflection• Application

Writing Session• Shared Review

– Questions about shared reflection of conclusions based on focus question

• Shared Writing– Model structure

• Scaffolding• Independent Writing

– Use scaffolding to complete notebook entries

Pg. 152

Page 38: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

Science Notebook “Rules”for Science Section

• Date, in numerals, the first page of the entry.• Write a focus or investigative question for

each lesson.• Write something about each science session.• Write legibly (not necessarily their “best

handwriting”).

Page 39: LeaPS Learning in Physical Science

• “You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to think like a rocket scientist.”

– Gerry Wheeler, NSTA Executive Director