12
Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution Fabian Kesicki UN Climate Change Conference (SB 34) in Bonn, 7 th June 2011

Kesicki mac curve - final

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Kesicki   mac curve - final

Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for cautionFabian KesickiUN Climate Change Conference (SB 34) in Bonn, 7th June 2011

Page 2: Kesicki   mac curve - final

This presentation is based on the report ‘Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: a Call for Caution’ written by Ekins, P., Kesicki, F. and A. Smith

A research article of the same name is forthcoming in Climate Policy.

2

Page 3: Kesicki   mac curve - final

Concept of Marginal Abatement Cost (MAC) Curves

Policy Use of MAC curves Shortcomings MAC Curves and REDD (Reducing Emissions

from Deforestation and Forest Degradation)

OVERVIEW

3

Page 4: Kesicki   mac curve - final

MAC CURVE CONCEPT

Residential electronics

Cars full hybrid

Residential appliances

Insulation retrofit

Efficiency improvement

Geothermal

Nuclear Cars plug-in

Offshore windOnshore wind

Solar CSPSolar PV

BiomassCoal CCS

Gas CCSElectric heat pump

Electric boiler

4

Page 5: Kesicki   mac curve - final

POLICY USE OF MAC CURVE Many areas:

Electricity saving Air pollution Waste reduction Water availability Energy-related emissions reduction REDD

Many countries: USA, EU, UK, France, Mexico, China REDD: Congo for example

5

Page 6: Kesicki   mac curve - final

PROBLEMS WITH CURRENT MAC CURVES Unclear assumptions Cost definition Implementation barriers Discounting Intertemporal issues Interactions / baseline emissions Behavioural aspects Ancillary benefits/costs Handling uncertainty Financial focus

6

Page 7: Kesicki   mac curve - final

ELECTRIC HYBRID CAR EXAMPLE

Parameter Unit Petrol ICE Petrol HybridDiscount rate % 5 5Lifetime years 12 12Investment cost € 19600 22400Operating cost €/a 1670 1732Annual kilometrage km/a 14481 14481Fuel consumption l/100 km 7 5.95Petrol price €/l 1.68 1.68Emission factor kg CO2/l 2.3 2.3

7

Page 8: Kesicki   mac curve - final

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Difference in investment cost

Investment cost [€]

Ab

ate

me

nt

co

st

[€ p

er

ton

CO

2]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Increase in fuel efficiency

Difference in fuel efficiency between Hybrid and ICE [%]

Ab

ate

me

nt

co

st

[€ p

er

ton

CO

2]

5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 200

200

400

600

800

1000

Vehicle life time

Vehicle life time [years]

Ab

ate

me

nt

co

st

[€ p

er

ton

CO

2]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Discount rate

Discount rate [%]

Ab

ate

me

nt

co

st

[€ p

er

ton

CO

2]

Page 9: Kesicki   mac curve - final

MAC CURVES AND REDD

Kindermann et al. 2008

Kindermann et al. 2008

Nabuurs et al. 2007

Eliasch 2008

Grieg-Gran 2008

Blaser and Robledo 2007 Holdren 2007(Brazil only)

Stern 2007

Nauclér and Enkvist 2009

Page 10: Kesicki   mac curve - final

MAC CURVES AND REDD Uncertainty concerning baseline emissions Focus on opportunity cost without

considering administration, implementation, monitoring costs

Price discrimination Potential leakage Interactions with demand for bioenergy,

timber industry

10

Page 11: Kesicki   mac curve - final

CONCLUSIONS MAC curves: simple and useful illustration

tool; first, rough guide to abatement costs and potentials at a specific point in time

Previously outlined caveats may have been overlooked in the past

MAC curves should be applied very carefully in the REDD debate

11

Page 12: Kesicki   mac curve - final

Thanks for your attention

Fabian [email protected]