Upload
doankien
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jute composite and its applications
S. Das
Indian Jute Industries’ Research Association17 Taratola Road, Kolkata-700088, India
1
Background:Composite materials from man-made fibres (i.e. glass fibre, carbon fibre etc.) are
already available as products for consumer and industrial uses. A relatively
newer concept is to consider natural fibres as a reinforcing material. Stringent
environmental legislation and consumer awareness has forced industries to
support long term sustainable growth and develop new technology based on
renewable feedstock that are independent of fossil fuels. As the current status
quo, the main reinforcement for the composite industry is glass fibres; 22.3 million
tons (metric) are produced globally on an annual basis. Although glass fibre
products have somewhat superior mechanical properties, their life cycle
performance is very questionable. Manufacturing of these products not only
consume huge energy but their disposal at the end of their life cycle is also very
difficult since there is virtually no recycling option.
Annual industrial crops grown for fibre, have the potential to supply enough
renewable biomass for various bio-products including composites. The scope of
possible uses of natural fibres is enormous. This is substantiated by the
declaration of United Nation for 2009 as International Year of Natural Fibres (IYNF).
All over the world, the bio-composite industry is developing at a significant pace to
meet growing consumer awareness and follow new environmental regulations. A
survey done by Canadian Agri-Food Research Council (CARC) in 2003 showed
that the European automotive industry has already taken the lead and uses
approximately 22,000 tons of natural plant fibre in low stress applications in cars.
In 2005, 19000 tones of natural fibres were used in Germany for automotive
composite. Lignocellulosic bio-fibre derived from various origins such as leaf, bast,
fruit, grass or cane; contribute to the strength of bio as well as synthetic polymer
composites in various applications. These fibres are renewable, non-abrasive to
process equipment, and can be incinerated at the end of their life cycle for energy
recovery as they possess a good deal of calorific value. They are also very safe
during handling, processing and use. Major natural fibres of vegetative origin used
as reinforcement are shown in Table- 1. Both thermoset and thermoplastic
matrices are used for development of natural fibre reinforced composite, the
comparative study of these two type of matrices are shown in Table- 2
2
Table: 1 Major natural fibres of vegetative origin used as reinforcement
Fibre TypeBagasse Cane
Bamboo Grass
Banana Stem
Coconut husk Fruit
Flax Bast
Hemp Bast
Jute Bast
Kenaf Bast
Sisal Leaf
Wood Stem
Advantages of natural fibre reinforced composites:
Reduction in density of products.
Acceptable specific strength, toughness and stiffness in comparison
with glass fibre reinforced composites.
Ease of shaping into complex shapes in a single manufacturing
process.
Lower energy consumption from fibre growing to finished composites
The manufacturing processes are relatively safe when compared with
glass based reinforced composites.
Possibility of recycling the cuttings and wastage produced during
manufacturing and moulding.
The production of natural fibres can be started with a low capital
investment and with a lower cost.
Bast fibres exhibit good thermal and acoustic insulation properties.
3
Table: 2 Summary of advantages and disadvantages of thermoset and thermoplastics as matrix
Property Thermoset Thermoplastics
Formulations Complex Simple
Melt viscosity Very low High
Fibre impregnation Easy Difficult
Prepeg stability Poor Excellent
Processing cycle Long Short to long
Processing
temperature / pressure
Low to moderate high High
Environmental durability Good Unknown
Solvent resistance Excellent Poor to good
Database Very large Small
The typical basic inherent characteristics of lignocellulosic fibre are shown in
Tables- 3 & 4.
Table: 3 Cell wall polymers responsible for the properties of lignocellulosics in the order of importance
Biological DegradationHemicellulose
Accessible Cellulose
Non-Crystalline Cellulose
Moisture SorptionHemicellulose
Accessible Cellulose
Non-Crystalline Cellulose
Lignin
Crystalline Cellulose
Ultraviolet DegradationLignin
Hemicellulose
Accessible Cellulose
Non-Crystalline Cellulose
Crystalline Cellulose
Thermal DegradationHemicellulose
Cellulose
Lignin
StrengthCrystalline Cellulose
Matrix (Non-Crystalline Cellulose + Hemicellulose + Lignin)
Lignin
Ref: Chemical modification of agro-resources for property enhancement, Paper
and Composites from Agro-based resources. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1996
4
Table: 4 Degradation reactions that occur when lignocellulosic resources are exposed to nature.
Biological Degradation
Fungi, Bacteria, Insects, Termites
Enzymatic Reactions
Chemical Reactions
Fire Degradation
Lighting, Sun, Man
Pyrolysis Reactions
Water Degradation
Rain, Sea, Ice, Acid Rain
Water Interactions
Weather Degradation
Ultraviolet Radiation, Water, Heat, Wind
Chemical Reactions
Mechanical Degradation
Dust, Wind, Hail, Snow, Sand
Mechanical
Ref: Chemical modification of agro-resources for property enhancement, Paper
and Composites from Agro-based resources. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1996
Disadvantages of natural fibre reinforced composites:
Lack of consistency of fibre quality, high level of variability in fibre
properties depending upon source and cultivars.
Preparation of fibre is labour intensive and time consuming.
Poor compatibility between fibres and matrix, which requires surface
treatment of fibres.
High moisture absorption, which brings about dimensional changes in
composite materials.
Low density of bast fibres can be disadvantageous during composites
processing application because fibre tends to migrate to the surface rather
then getting mixed with matrix.
Fluctuation in price depending upon the global demand and production.
Problem of storing raw material for extended time due to possibility of
degradation, biological attack of fungi and mildew, loss in colour, and foul
odour development.
Lower resistance to ultra violet radiation, which causes the structural
degradation of the composites.
5
Major R & D Work at IJIRAExtensive R & D work has been carried out at IJIRA on jute reinforced composite
since early 80’s. The first work was carried out in collaboration with AERE,
Harwell, U.K. using high performance matrices i.e. epoxy, polyester etc. to
compare with mainly glass fibre reinforced composites.
From late 80’s the objective was concentrated to develop wood substitute by jute
composite targeting packaging and building materials. Low density polyethylene
films were used with jute non-woven and fabric for fabrication of jute composite.
These were tried for packaging of tea & horticultural produce. Some of the
mechanical properties are given in Tables-5 & 6.
Table: 5 Flexural Properties of jute composite from jute nonwoven and low density polyethylene as matrix
Sl.
No.
Samples Flexural Strength
(MPa)
Flexural Modulus
(MPa)
Strain
%
1. Jute non-woven* +
LDPE film
31.84 1433 8.013
*Jute nonwoven- unidirectional & 400 gsm (nominal) *LDPE film- 50 gsm
Ref: “Studies on jute composite from jute nonwoven”, 16th Technological
conference, IJIRA, 11th – 12th Feb, 1993
Table: 6 Properties of jute composite from jute nonwoven and low density polyethylene as matrix for packaging end- uses. (IIP- Kolkata)
Material Average test value
Gram/m2 Puncture
resistance
oz-inch
tear inch
Water
absorption
(surface)
24 hrs at 30
C, gm/m2
Bursting
str.
Kg/cm2
Tensile
str.
(MPa)
Mod. of
elasticity
(MPa)
Jute non-
woven +
LDPE film
1470 577.1 20.7 45.3 31.36 1756
Ref: “Studies on jute composite from jute nonwoven”, 16th Technological
conference, IJIRA, 11th – 12th Feb, 1993
6
Lignocellulosic fibres are favourably bonded with phenolic resin to have better
water resistance rather than urea or melamine resin. Hence, water soluble phenol
formaldehyde resin was selected for the development of rigid jute board for good
serviceable mechanical properties. To achieve better wetability of jute with resin
and to improve strength properties, fibre pre-treatment is necessary. Simple pre-
treatment is done with low-condensed resins like melamine resin, phenolic resin
and CNSL modified phenol formaldehyde resin. Indicative physical properties of
jute composites from untreated & pre treated jute nonwoven with PF resin are
shown in Table-7.
Jute as other lignocellulosic fibres consists of –OH group which causes it
susceptible to moisture and directly impairs the properties of jute composite
specially dimensional stability. Due to this polar group, jute also is not efficiently
adhered to non polar matrices. To overcome this difficulties this fibre should be
modified chemically or hygrothermally. To improve the interface adhesion
between the non polar matrices and hydrophilic fibre, coupling agent or
compatibiliser should be used.
Some investigations were done by cyanoethylation and acetylation of jute fibre to
reduce the –OH content. The both processes are effective for dimensional
stability. Cyanoethylation also improves the bonding between jute and non polar
matrix like unsaturated polyester resin.
Indicative properties of jute composites made from modified fibres with urea
formaldehyde resin & unsaturated polyester resin (USP) are given in Tables-8 &
9.
7
Table: 7 Physical properties of different jute composites
Sl.
No.
Samples Tensile
strength
(MPa)
Flexural
strength (Dry)
(MPa)
Flexural strength
(After 2 hrs.
boiling in water)
(MPa)
1. Untreated non-
woven* + PF resin
42.10 68.24 22.17
2. MF pretreated non-
woven + PF resin
49.99 73.97 27.50
3. PF pretreated non-
woven + PF resin
47.70 72.32 26.13
4. CNSL – PF
pretreated non-
woven + PF resin
62.21 90.03 58.27
Ref: “Studies on jute composite from jute nonwoven”, 16th Technological
conference, IJIRA, 11th – 12th Feb, 1993
Table: 8 Effect of Cyanoethylation on Mechanical Properties of jute composites
Sample Tensile Strength (MPa)
Flexural Strength (MPa)
Flexural Mod
(GPa)
Water absorption%
Thickness swelling %
2hr in boiling water
24hr in cold
water
2hr in boiling water
24hr in cold water
Control 74.24 84.81 12.97 48.09 49.76 62.31 31.94
MJC-4 108.60 136.90 18.05 12.46 5.45 12.97 10.36Ref: “Improvement of functional properties of jute based composite by acrylonitrile pretreatment”, J. of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 78, 495-506 (2000)
8
Table: 9 Effect of Acetylation on Mechanical Properties of jute composites
Sl.
No.
Samples Tensile
strength
(MPa)
Flexural
strength
(MPa)
Thickness
swelling %
% Retention
of tensile
strength after
5 cyclic test
(immersion &
oven dry)
% Retention of
flexural strength
after 5 cyclic
test (immersion
& oven dry)
1 hr 7 days
1. CNa 62.92 39.13 29.00 40.80 30.35 24.12
2. ANa 66.66 42.33 17.50 23.00 50.25 50.34
3. CNH 56.25 37.12 23.5 37.55 29.35 26.25
4. ANH 57.22 39.00 14.00 20.00 48.77 49.47
5. CMF 49.58 40.21 17.00 20.70 55.70 55.12
6. AMF 60.04 44.45 13.36 18.9 61.12 59.33
Jute sliver + 25% UF resin including additives
CNa- control jute sliver with NaCl and UF resin; ANa- acetylated jute sliver with NaCl and
UF resin;
CNH- control jute sliver with NH4Cl and UF resin;ANH- control jute sliver with NH4Cl and
UF resin;
CMF- control jute sliver with melamine and UF resin; AMF- control jute sliver with
melamine and UF resin;
Ref: “Effect of acetylation on dimensional stability, mechanical and dynamic
properties of jute board”, J. of Applied Polymer Science, vol.72, 935-944
(1999)
Hygrothermal pretreatment on jute fibre was done by spraying extra water on fibre
and was formed in square mat. The mat was placed in a closed mould and
pressed at 200 C for a few minutes to modify the fibre. These modified fibres
were moulded with PF resin as normal compression moulding process. Here the
dimensional properties have been improved but the other mechanical properties
have been reduced drastically due to thermal degradation of fibre and shown in
Table- 10.
9
Table: 10 Effect of Steam Pretreatment on properties of jute composites
Samples Flex. Str. kg/cm2
Flex. Mod. Kg/cm2
Water absorption%
Thickness swelling%
24 h. 2 h boiling 24 h. 2 h boilingControl 127.32 18578.84 166.57 137.13 77.65 97.27
SB4 39.28 12682.42 95.6 90.94 18.69 24.45SRB4 85.87 13963.74 64.3 64.5 16.07 24.24SB8 24.46 7412.00 88.93 87.26 11.98 21.67
SRB8 77.68 8825.40 56.75 60.18 11.52 21.09Control- board from jute fibre + 7% PF;
SB4- board from 4 min. steam stabilized fibre.
SB8- board from 8 min. steam stabilized fibre.
SRB4- board from 4 min. steam stabilized fibre + 7% PF
SRB8- board from 8 min. steam stabilized fibre + 7% PF
Ref: “Effect of steam pretreatment of jute fibre on dimensional stability of jute
composite”, J. of Applied Polymer Science, vol.76, 1652-1661 (2000)
Process steps for fabrication of jute composite from thermoset resin:
Impregnation & drying- jute substrate (nonwoven / woven fabric) is dipped in resin solution and squeezed to retain the required amount of resin and then passed through dryer to reduce the moisture.
Cutting of substrate- The treated substrate is cut to size as per dimension required.
Compression moulding- Books inside the platen are pressed to desired specific pressure and temperature for pre defined time to get moulded product. After completion of compression cycle, the platens are cooled to optimum temperature & then the pressure is released to take out the products.
Post curing- Compression moulded products are post cured in oven to get fully cured and free from any precondensate polymer.
Cutting & sanding- The moulded product is trimmed and sanded.
For continuous moulded profile from jute reinforced composite, thermoplastic matrix (PP) was used for melt blend with jute. In this process short jute fibre was melt blended with polypropylene granules in presence of compatibilizer maleated polypropylene. The properties are optimized on 60% jute fibre with 38% polypropylene and 2% maleated polypropylene (Table- 11).
10
Table: 11 Effect of Compatibiliser on Mechanical Properties of Jute-PP composites
Sample Tensile Strength(MPa)
Tensile Modulus(GPa)
Flexural Strength(MPa)
Flexural Mod(GPa)
Water Absorption%
2hr in boiling water
24hr in cold
water
J600 33.5 10.35 57.50 10.02 3.06 1.86
J602 68 10.50 109 10 2.22 0.91J600- Jute fibre 60%, Polypropylene 40%
J602- Jute fibre 60%, Polypropylene 38%, Maleated polypropylene 2%
Ref: “Short jute fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: Effect of
compatibiliser”, J. of Applied Polymer Science, vol.69, 329-338 (1998)
Process steps for melt blend of jute PP:
Chopping- Jute fibre was stapled unto 100 mm Granulating- Stapled jute fibres were further reduced in size unto 10 mm
(max) by passing through rotary granulating m/c Mixing- Short jute fibres with matrix were mixed in Kinetic mixer m/c at
5500 rpm & 199 C to form dough Pressing- Hot dough of mixture was flattened by pressing with hydraulic
press to release excess heat Reduction of size- Flattened dough sheet was cut into pieces by running
through band saw Granulating- Small pieces were further reduced in size by running through
granulator. Injection molding- Granules of jute-pp were injection moulded to test
pieces.
Age old practice of fabrication of reinforced product is hand lay-up process. But resin consumption is very high and productivity is very low due to long processing time. New moulding technique, i.e. Resin Transfer Moulding, is used to replace hand layup process for better productivity and quality.Resin transfer moulding literally means the transfer of the matrix under pressure to the closed mould containing the reinforcing substrate. This is the inverse process of vacuum moulding. Mainly unsaturated polyester resin was used as matrix. Work was done to evaluate the influence of jute as an additional substrate with glass and some of the properties are shown in Table- 12
11
Table: 12 Flexural Properties of jute and jute-glass fibre composites fabricated by resin transfer moulding
Sl. no
Weight of fibre%
Flex. Str.(MPa)
Flex. Mod. (GPa)
Jute Glass Total1 33 -- 33 95.65 6.652 28 -- 28 82.55 5.853 18 15 33 121.51 6.884 -- 33 -- 153.77 7.12
Ref: “Jute composites by Resin Transfer Moulding- An improved alternatives for hand lay up technique”, 20th Technological Conference, April 18, 1998
Pultrusion is a modern technique used for producing continuous fibre reinforced profile in which the orientation of the fibre is kept constant during cure. This process is suitable for thermosetting resins like polyester, epoxy & phenolic resin systems. An infinite number of profiles can be produced using appropriate dies and includes rods, tubes, flat & angle sections. Pultrusion technique has been utilized for making door frame using jute as reinforcement and phenol formaldehyde resin as matrix. This has been evaluated by Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee & shown in the Table- 13.
Table: 13 Physico-mechanical properties of pultruded jute profile
Property ValueA. Physical properties
Bulk density (Kg/m3) 873Moisture content (%) 4.41Water absorption (%)
I. 2 hrs.II. 24 hrs.
3.6112.31
Surface water absorption (24 hrs., %) 1.52Change in swelling (%)
I. ThicknessII. LengthIII. width
0.370.0130.041
Due to surface absorption (%) NegligibleB. Mechanical properties
Flexural yield strength (MPa) 62.60Modulus of elasticity (GPa) 5.31Tensile strength (MPa) 33.0Elongation (%) 0.86Tensile modulus (GPa) 7.98Internal bond strength (MPa) 0.66Screw withdrawal strength (N), Face 1800
Ref: “Suitability assessment of JRP Pultruded profile as door frame materials in building”, Report No. F(C) 0176, Feb. 1998, Organic Building Materials Division, CBRI, Roorkee.
12
Application areas of jute reinforced polymer compositeswith technical advantages
Application areas Advantages
Automobile industries door panels seat backs headliners, dash boards trunk liners
Lighter in weight Lesser raw material Cost economic Serviceable mechanical
properties Use of renewable resource
Building Component Door Window Wall partition Ceiling Floor
Better physical properties Fire, termite & better moisture
resistance properties Available at semi finished /
finished state i.e. reduced labour & finishing cost
Transport Sector (railway coach & vehicle)
Flooring Ceiling Seat & Backrest
Better physical properties Fire, termite & better moisture
resistance properties Available at semi finished /
finished state i.e. reduced labour & finishing cost
Furniture Table Chair Kitchen cabinet etc.
Better physical properties Fire, termite & better moisture
resistance properties Available at semi finished /
finished state i.e. reduced labour & finishing cost
Future R & D plan
Broadly defined bio-composite are composite materials made from natural fibre and petroleum derived non biodegradable polymers like polyester, phenolic, PP etc. These polymer matrices are becoming costlier because of the fluctuating price of petrochemicals. These resins could be made cheaper by modification with cheaper bio-resources.
Bio-composite derived from plant fibre & crop / bio-derived plastic are likely more eco-friendly and such bio-composites are termed as green composite. Future attempt would therefore be to develop cheaper biodegradable matrix utilizing modification of bio-resources.
13