J. Renee Navarro, Pharm D, MD Vice Chancellor Professor of Anesthesia and Perioperative Services

Office of Diversity and Outreach

J. Renee Navarro, Pharm D, MDVice ChancellorProfessor of Anesthesia and Perioperative Services

UCSF Office of Diversity and Outreach

Campus Climate Survey ResultsPharmacy Faculty Council

April 2, 2014


• Awareness of high level results.• Input on UCSF next steps and Strategic Initiatives. • Future engagement and support for strategic

initiatives.

Discussion Today


• UC Systemwide survey for students, staff, faculty, post-docs, trainees across 10 campuses, UCOP, LBNL, and Agriculture & Natural Resources.

• Goal: to collect data related to institutional climate, inclusion and work-life.

• Largest survey of its kind in the nation – across UC System 104,000 completed

• 13 location reports, 1 systemwide report, 1 summary report

UC Systemwide Climate Survey


• Climate: “the current attitudes, behaviors, and standards of faculty, staff, administrators, and students concerning the level of respect for individual needs, abilities and potential” (Rankin).• Measured by assessment of personal experiences,

perceptions and institutional efforts (97 items)

UC Systemwide Climate Survey


• Each campus had option of adding additional questions to be administered only on their campus.– UCSF Specific Questions:

1) academic pipeline for trainees and graduate students; 2) community involvement/support at UCSF; and 3) faculty use of leave policies outlined in APM.

Campus Specific Questions


• UC System – staggered data collection between October 2012 and March 2013.

• UCSF first campus – Nov 5, 2012 to Jan 14, 2013.• UCSF highest campus response rate: 47% (n = 9,434)– Faculty: 45%– Staff non-union: 51%– Staff union: 26%– Graduate/Professional Student: 38%– Post-docs: 57%– Trainees: 25%

UCSF Data Collection and Response Rate


• Gender– Female: 64% (n = 6030); Male: 35% (n = 3272);

Transgender: 0.28% (n = 26); Gender queer: 0.62% (n = 58)• Ethnic/Racial Sample % (compared to UCSF)

– African American: 5.6 (5.75)– American Indian/Alaska Native: 1.3 (.45)– Asian: 28.6 (33.9)– Hispanic/Latino: 9.7 (9.9)– Middle eastern/SW Asian, North African: 3.4 (NA)– Pacific Islander: 0.60 (NA)– White: 50.1 (45.1)– Other: 0.68 (NA)

Survey Sample Fairly Representative ofUCSF Population


• Disability– 16% report

• Religion/Spiritual Affiliation– No Affiliation: 44%– Christian: 33%– Multiple Affiliations: 7%– Other (not listed): 6%– Jewish: 4%– Muslim: 1%

UCSF Sample Demographics


• Majority view UCSF as respectful of all groups• Majority think UCSF values diversity• Faculty & staff report access to guidance/advice• Most report classroom climate welcoming based on

gender identity and race• Students positive about academics and valued by

faculty

UCSF Findings – Strengths


• 76% overall view UCSF climate as positive‒ Students particularly positive about UCSF experience ‒ LGBT overall report positive attitudes and inclusive

environment

• 72% overall view climate in Dept/School/Work Unit as positive

• 82% of students view classroom climate as positive

UCSF Findings – Strengths


“Overall, how comfortable are you with the climate at UCSF?”

Comfort with Campus ClimateAll Respondents (N = 9434)

26% Very Comfortable (n = 2409)50% Comfortable (n = 4735)15% Neither Comfortable nor

Uncomfortable (n = 1452)7% Uncomfortable (n = 693)1% Very Uncomfortable (n = 134)

76%


• While majority are comfortable with climate at UCSF, variation by group

• Most notable differences:– Racial/Ethnic: “Under-represented minority”* less

comfortable with overall climate at UCSF & climate in dept/work units and classes

– Disabled: less comfortable with climate at UCSF, Dept. & classroom

– Transgender: least comfortable with climate (n = 26)

UCSF FindingsOpportunities for Improvement

*“Underrepresented Minority” category includes African American, American Indian/Alaska Native respondents, and Hispanic/Latino respondents.


Staff Grad/Professional Students

Faculty Post-docs/Trainees0

20

40

60

80

100

73%

85%

73%

86%

Overall Comfort by PositionPe

rcen

t

(n = 4404) (n = 1009) (n = 843) (n = 888)


Heterosexual LGBQ0

20

40

60

80

100

76% 76%

Overall Comfort by Sexual IdentityPe

rcen

t

(n = 5744) (n = 865)


White Asian Underrepresented Minority0

20

40

60

80

100

76% 79%73%

Overall Comfort by Race/EthnicityPe

rcen

t

(n = 3345) (n = 2087) (n = 1584)


Disability No Disability0

20

40

60

80

100

67%

77%

Overall Comfort by Disability Status

Perc

ent

(n = 957) (n = 5846)


Men Women0

20

40

60

80

100

79%74%

Overall Comfort by GenderPe

rcen

t

(n = 2599) (n = 4488)


Christian Jewish Multiple Muslim No Affliation0

20

40

60

80

100

77%81%

76% 73% 76%

Overall Comfort by ReligionPe

rcen

t

(n = 2375) (n = 323) (n = 486) (n = 58) (n = 3124)


Military Civilian0

20

40

60

80

100

73% 76%

Overall Comfort by Military StatusPe

rcen

t

(n = 200) (n = 6807)


Faculty Post-docs/Trainees Staff Student0

20

40

60

80

100

71%82%

68%

83%

Department Climate by PositionPe

rcen

t

(n = 823) (n = 849) (n = 4135) (n = 991)


Heterosexual LGBQ0

20

40

60

80

100

72% 74%

Department Climate by Sexual Identity

Perc

ent

(n = 5450) (n = 848)



20

40

60

80

100

73% 74% 69%

Department Climate by Race/Ethnicity

Perc

ent

(n = 3210) (n = 2352) (n = 1023)


Men Women0

20

40

60

80

100

75% 71%

Department Climate by GenderPe

rcen

t

(n = 2459) (n = 4268)



20

40

60

80

100

85% 85%

70%

Student Class Comfort by Race/Ethnicity

Perc

ent

(n = 382) (n = 368) (n = 146)


Men Women0

20

40

60

80

100

85%80%

Student Class Comfort by GenderPe

rcen

t

(n = 338) (n = 577)


Heterosexual LGBQ0

20

40

60

80

100

83% 78%

Student Class Comfort by Sexual Identity

Perc

ent

(n = 781) (n = 109)


• Experiencing Non-Inclusive Behavior– 29% report experiencing non-inclusive behavior

• 17% of these respondents said the non-inclusive behavior did not interfere with ability to work or learn.

• 12% said the behavior interfered with ability to work or learn.

– Variation by Position, Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Sexual Identity

– Most common reported experiences: • Isolated• Ignored• Intimidated/Bullied



Staff Grad/Professional Students

Faculty Post-docs/Trainees0

20

40

60

80

100

32% 24% 23% 23%

Exclusionary Conduct by PositionPe

rcen

t

(n = 1940) (n = 287) (n = 262) (n = 235)



20

40

60

80

100

27% 27%37%

Exclusionary Conduct by Race/Ethnicity

Perc

ent

(n = 1173) (n = 852) (n = 549)


Men Women Transgender Genderqueer0

20

40

60

80

100

24%31%

62%

48%

Exclusionary Conduct by Gender Identity

Perc

ent

(n = 789) (n = 1874) (n = 16) (n = 30)


Heterosexual LGBQ0

20

40

60

80

100

28% 31%

Exclusionary Conduct by Sexual Identity

Perc

ent

(n = 2095) (n = 351)


• Retention:– 43% of faculty seriously considered leaving in the past year

– 37% of staff seriously considered leaving in the past year



• About ¾ feel comfortable with climate at their location• Minority groups less comfortable and more likely to

experience exclusionary behavior• UC locations more similar than different• UC more similar than different to other colleges and

universities where survey has been administered

UC Systemwide Findings Similar to UCSF


• Reports released: March Regents meeting • UCSF community involvement: April - September 2014

– Input and ownership from stakeholders and refining data analysis• Qualitative data analysis pending

– Community meetings held on all UCSF campuses – Campus priority areas finalized

• Develop campus strategic initiatives and action plans based on survey results (Winter 2014)

Next Steps at UCSF


Full Report Available: http://campusclimate.ucop.edu/_common/files/pdf-climate/ucsf-full-report.pdf

Thank you

http://campusclimate.ucop.edu/_common/files/pdf-climate/ucsf-full-report.pdf



Documents

J. Renee Navarro, Pharm D, MD Vice Chancellor Professor of Anesthesia and Perioperative Services