Upload
barid
View
57
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ISCI 3rd International Conference 28th July 2011, University of York. Challenges in the analysis of children’s health risks caused by indoor air pollution in developing countries using and processing data on children’s well-being. Yoko Shimada, Setsunan University, Japan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ISCI 3rd International Conference28th July 2011, University of York
Challenges in the analysis of children’s health risks caused by indoor air pollution in developing countries
using and processing data on children’s well-being
Yoko Shimada, Setsunan University, JapanYuzuru Matsuoka, Kyoto University, Japan
Presentation plan
1. Background
2. Objectives of research
3. Concept of estimation
4. Results of the analysis
5. Summary and outlook for the future
Direct health impacts
Developing countries
Household energy use: mainly relies on combustion of solid fuels
Emission of air pollutants(CO, SO2, NO2, PM etc.)
People are exposed to indoor air pollution
Background (1)WHO “Fuel for Life: Household Energy and Health” p.29
Biomass (wood, animal dung, crop wastes), charcoal, coal
Exposure affects mainly women while cooking, and infants and young children who are usually with their mothers near the cooking area.
UNDP/WHO 2009 report“The Energy Access Situation in Developing Countries, A review Focusing on the Least Developed Countries and Sub-Saharan Africa”
・ 56% of people in developing countries still rely on solid fuels for cooking. 3 billion people ( almost half the world’s population)
・ 2 million deaths annually are associated with the indoor burning of solid fuels in unventilated kitchens
44% of these deaths are children. among adult deaths; 60 % are women
Key Health effects of indoor air pollution・ Childhood Acute Lower Respiratory Infections (ALRI)・ Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)・ Lung Cancer
Background (2)
Background (3)
Suggested improvement measures:
・ Improved stoves・ Improved ventilation・ Kitchen design and placement of the stove・ Using clean fuels (kerosene, gas) , or electricity
Recognize and assess the exposure of people to this kind of pollution
Objectives of research
To develop a model to quantitatively analyze indoor air exposure concentration for individual cohorts categorized according to sex, age, occupation status and other factors
To assess the impact of exposure in detail by linking people’s use of time which reflect differences in individual daily life activities
The selected indoor air pollutant:
PM2.5・ Small particles < 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter ・ Penetrate deep into the lungs and appear to have the greatest potential to damage health
WHO Air Quality Guideline was set in 2005 Annual mean 10 μg/m3
24 hour mean 25 μg/m3
Concept of estimation
Estimation of Indoor PM2.5 Exposure
aa m m
m
E C T
Daily IndoorPM2.5 exposure concentration (μg/m3) for cohort a:aE
m : Microenvironment
mC : PM2.5 concentration in microenvironment m
a mamT : Time proportion of cohort staying in microenvironment
Cohort classification・ Cohort classification must represent a variety of individuals.
・ Cohorts of children are important to estimate indoor PM2.5 exposure, because PM2.5 exposure affects mainly women, and young children who are with their mothers during cooking and other household activities.
MaleFemale
01 ~ 4
5 ~ 1415 ~ 2425 ~ 3435 ~ 64
65+
WorkingNot working
Gender Age Working status
× × 22 types of cohort
Type of cohort
gender age working condition1 Male 0 -2 Male 1-4 -3 Male 5-14 -4 Male 15-24 Working5 Male 15-24 Not working6 Male 25-34 Working7 Male 25-34 Not working8 Male 35-64 Working9 Male 35-64 Not working10 Male 65+ Working11 Male 65+ Not working12 Female 0 -13 Female 1-4 -14 Female 5-14 -15 Female 15-24 Working16 Female 15-24 Not working17 Female 25-34 Working18 Female 25-34 Not working19 Female 35-64 Working20 Female 35-64 Not working21 Female 65+ Working22 Female 65+ Not working
Typecombination
a
Estimation of Indoor PM2.5 Exposure
aa m m
m
E C T
Daily IndoorPM2.5 exposure concentration (μg/m3) for cohort a:aE
m : Microenvironment
mC : PM2.5 concentration in microenvironment m
a mamT : Time proportion of cohort staying in microenvironment
“Microenvironment “
A space that has a uniform concentration of pollutants and in which people are present temporarily Interior space of the residence as being made up of a finite number of microenvironments defined by Duan (1982)
Microenvironment indoors at home
m
Microenvironment Purpose Location PM 2.5 source inside residence
Corresponding time spent indoors athome
A Cooking,Eeating
Kitchen,Dining room
Use of cookingburner or hearth
Cooking time + time spent eating indoors at home
B To heat roomsIndoors at homeexcluding kitchenand dining room
Use of fireplace,portable heater etc.
Time spent indoors at home, excludingsleeping time (when outdoor airtemperature is 10 °C or lower)
C To light uprooms
Indoors at homeexcludingbed room
Use of oil orkerosene lamp
Time spent indoors at home during thenight- time excluding sleeping time
Estimation of Indoor PM2.5 Exposure
aa m m
m
E C T
Daily IndoorPM2.5 exposure concentration (μg/m3) for cohort a:aE
m : Microenvironment
mC : PM2.5 concentration in microenvironment m
a mamT : Time proportion of cohort staying in microenvironment
md
mmm VF
eSC
m
Emission Factor (μg/KJ)
Air Exchange Rate (1/hour)
Removal Rate from indoor air (1/hour)
Volume of Microenvironment (m3)
Fuel Consumption (KJ/hour)
PM2.5 concentration in microenvironment mC
Fuel Consumption for each type of fuel
← International Energy Agency: “ World Energy Outlook 2002” “Energy Balances of Non-OECD countries 1960-2005
PM2.5 Emission Factor for each type of fuelEmission
factor (µg/KJ) Source
Firewood 180 Li et al., 2007Charcoal 300 Andreae et al., 2001Crop residue 274 Li et al., 2007Animal dung 429 Reddy et al., 2002
52.4 Ge et al., 2004119 Zhang et al., 2000
0 Fan et al., 2001110 Fan et al., 20012.37 Zhang et al., 20003.07 Zhang et al., 2000
Kerosene (heating)Kerosene (illumination)LPGNatural gas
Type of fuel
Biomas
CoalKerosene (cooking / heating water)
Air exchange rate
← Zhang et al., 1999, Davidson et al. 1986
Removal rate of PM2.5 from indoor← Ozkaynak et al., 1996
Volume of each microenvironment
Household survey data or Census for each country
This is calculated using the data on floor areas, which assumes the height of each microenvironment to be 2 meters.
Estimation of Indoor PM2.5 Exposure
aa m m
m
E C T
Daily IndoorPM2.5 exposure concentration (μg/m3) for cohort a:aE
m : Microenvironment
mC : PM2.5 concentration in microenvironment m
a mamT : Time proportion of cohort staying in microenvironment
Time Use Survey Data
A (Cooking & Eating)
Corresponding time proportion of each cohort staying in 3 microenvironment
B (Heating)
C (Lighting)
Time allocation of daily activities classified by gender, age, working status
amT
during the day-timeduring the night-time
Time spent indoors not at homeTime spent outdoors
Time allocation for 24 hours
Timespentindoors athome
Sleeping timeCooking timeEating time indoorsOtheractivities
Time Use Survey Data
In almost all countries, the respondents in the time use survey were 15 years of age or over.
Time proportion of each cohort of children (boys and girls aged 0, 1 to 4, and 5 – 14) is set using survey data related to children’s labor, education and daily life
Children’s time use activity categories
Boys/girlsaged 0
Boys/girlsaged 1 - 4
Boys/girlsaged 5 - 14
Sleeping Sleeping ○ ○ ○Satying in kitchen ○ ○ ○Eating ○ ○ ○Other activities at home ○ ○ ○At school ○ ○At home ○ ○Other than at home ○ ○Indoors at home ○ ○Indoors not at home ○ ○Outdoors ○ ○Economic activities: outdoors ○Economic activities: indoorsother than at home ○
At home ○
Cohorts
Eating andother indooractivities
Studying
Playing
Working
Children's time use activity categories
Setting of children’s time spent at home for each activity ・ Staying in kitchen Assumed by referring to the time spent cooking by unemployed
females aged 25 – 34; the mothers with children in each country. ↑ For children aged 0 and 1 to 4, the daily life activity time for
children in each country is thought to take place in the kitchen, with the children being carried by their mother, and as a result they are thought to be exposed to fuel combustion during cooking.
・ Working time for 0 and 1 - 4 years of age :assumed to be zero for 5 - 14 years of age: set using the data from UNICEF: ” The state of the world’s children 2009” ILO: “Global child labor trends 2000 to 2004” (2006) UCW★ (Understanding Children’s Work): “Child labor survey database”
★ A joint program of the ILO, UNICEF and World Bank
・ Time spent at school set using the data from UNICEF: ” The state of the world’s children 2009” UCW: “Child labor survey database”
・ Sleeping time set using the data from Benesse Co., Ltd. : “Basic Survey on Young Children's Daily Lives and Parents' Childrearing in Five East Asian Cities: Tokyo, Seoul, Beijing, Shanghai, and Taipei.” ・ Time spent in other activities we were unable to obtain data.
Sleeping SleepingSatying in kitchenEatingOther activities at homeAt school / NurseryAt homeOther than at homeIndoors at homeIndoors not at homeOutdoorsEconomic activities: outdoorsEconomic activities: indoorsother than at homeAt home
Playing
Working
Children's time use activity categories
Eating andother indooractivities
Studying
Corresponding time proportion of each cohort of children staying in the 3 microenvironments: A, B and C.
Classification of time proportion of each cohort of children staying in each microenvironment
during the day-timeduring the night-time
Time spentindoors athome
Time spent indoors not at homeTime spent outdoors
Time allocation for 24 hoursSleeping timeCooking timeEating time indoorsOtheractivities
Results of the analysis
Mi croenvi ronmentA (cooki ng +
eati ng)Mi croenvi ronment
B (heati ng)Mi croenvi ronment
C (Li ghti ng) Overal l
Japan 0. 9 1. 7 0. 0 2. 6South Korea 3. 0 29. 3 0. 0 32. 3Chi na 427. 5 444. 2 1. 5 873. 2Tai wan 6. 7 15. 4 0. 0 22. 1Nepal 285. 2 128. 8 1. 4 415. 3Paki stan 178. 2 130. 8 0. 9 310. 0Bhutan 156. 7 115. 5 1. 1 273. 3Indi a 205. 7 8. 5 5. 5 219. 7Bangl adesh 127. 2 0. 0 0. 6 127. 8Indonesi a 171. 9 0. 0 16. 2 188. 1Mal aysi a 39. 9 0. 0 0. 6 40. 6Phi l i ppi nes 107. 8 0. 0 0. 0 107. 8Thai l and 58. 2 0. 3 0. 0 58. 5Cambodi a 155. 0 0. 0 0. 4 155. 4Laos 266. 3 151. 9 0. 9 419. 1
Cohort average dai l y i ndoor PM 2. 5 exposed concentrati on (μ g/ m3)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Male age 0Male age 1 - 4
Male age 5 - 14Employed male age 15 - 24
Unemployed male age 15 - 24Employed male age 25 - 34
Unemployed male age 25 - 34Employed male age 35 - 64
Unemployed male age 35 - 64Employed male age 65 or older
Unemployed male age 65 or olderFemale age 0
Female age 1 - 4Female age 5 - 14
Employed female age 15 - 24Unemployed female age 15 - 24
Employed female age 25 - 34Unemployed female age 25 - 34
Employed female age 35 - 64Unemployed female age 35 - 64Employed female age 65 or older
Unemployed female age 65 or older
Average daily exposure concentration μ g/ m( 3)
Microenvironment A(cooking / eating)Microenvironment B(heating)Microenvironment C(lighting)
Estimated Average Daily Indoor PM 2.5 Exposure Concentration by Cohort in China
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Male age 0Male age 1 - 4
Male age 5 - 14Employed male age 15 - 24
Unemployed male age 15 - 24Employed male age 25 - 34
Unemployed male age 25 - 34Employed male age 35 - 64
Unemployed male age 35 - 64Employed male age 65 or older
Unemployed male age 65 or olderFemale age 0
Female age 1 - 4Female age 5 - 14
Employed female age 15 - 24Unemployed female age 15 - 24
Employed female age 25 - 34Unemployed female age 25 - 34
Employed female age 35 - 64Unemployed female age 35 - 64Employed female age 65 or older
Unemployed female age 65 or
Average daily exposure concentration μ g/ m( 3)
Microenvironment A(cooking / eating)Microenvironment B(heating)Microenvironment C(lighting)
Estimated Average Daily Indoor PM 2.5 Exposure Concentration by Cohort in India
Indoor time use of each cohort in China
0 6 12 18 24
Male age 0Male age 1 - 4
Male age 5 - 14Employed male age 15 - 24
Unemployed male age 15 - 24Employed male age 25 - 34
Unemployed male age 25 - 34Employed male age 35 - 64
Unemployed male age 35 - 64Employed male age 65 or older
Unemployed male age 65 or olderFemale age 0
Female age 1 - 4Female age 5 - 14
Employed female age 15 - 24Unemployed female age 15 - 24
Employed female age 25 - 34Unemployed female age 25 - 34
Employed female age 35 - 64Unemployed female age 35 - 64Employed female age 65 or older
Unemployed female age 65 or
hour
Sleeping timeCooking timeThe others
Cooking time of the cohort of unemployed females aged 35 - 64 is the longest
0 6 12 18 24
Male age 0Male age 1 - 4
Male age 5 - 14Employed male age 15 - 24
Unemployed male age 15 - 24Employed male age 25 - 34
Unemployed male age 25 - 34Employed male age 35 - 64
Unemployed male age 35 - 64Employed male age 65 or older
Unemployed male age 65 or olderFemale age 0
Female age 1 - 4Female age 5 - 14
Employed female age 15 - 24Unemployed female age 15 - 24
Employed female age 25 - 34Unemployed female age 25 - 34
Employed female age 35 - 64Unemployed female age 35 - 64Employed female age 65 or older
Unemployed female age 65 or
hour
Sleeping timeCooking timeThe others
Cooking time of the cohort of unemployed females aged 35 - 64 is the longest
Indoor time use of each cohort in India
Summary
Our study enabled detailed assessment of the impact of exposure to PM2.5, because differences in individual daily life activities were reflected in the use of time and linked to an assessment of exposure to indoor air-polluting substances.
However, it will also be important to develop exposure models that take into account the great difference between urban and rural lifestyles in developing countries, as well as the great differences between countries in terms of housing conditions, dietary practices and religious and cultural lifestyles.
For assessment of children’s indoor exposure, it will be necessary to collect more data on children’s time use, child care, education and their mother’s daily activities, which are linked to model parameters.