Upload
belita
View
23
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Status and perspectives in pp and pA -collisions in LHCb for photoproduction and diffractive processes. Patrick Robbe on behalf of LHCb, LAL Orsay, 2 Dec 2013, SaporeGravis Workshop, Nantes (France). Introduction. LHCb Detector - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Patrick Robbe on behalf of LHCb, LAL Orsay, 2 Dec 2013, SaporeGravis Workshop, Nantes (France)
Status and perspectives in pp and pA-collisions in LHCb for
photoproduction and diffractive processes
2
Introduction
• LHCb Detector
• Analysis techniques for Central Exclusive Production at LHCb
• J/y and y(2S) cross-sections
• cc cross-sections
• Future prospects
3
LHCb Detector
• Single arm spectrometer• Fully instrumented in 2 < h < 5• Backward track reconstruction in -4 < h < -1.5
JINST 3 (2008) S08005
4
LHCb Detector
• Vertex Locator:• 42 silicon strip detectors
surrounding interaction region• Detectors upstream of interaction
point allowing reconstruction of backward tracks
• Scintillating Pad Detector (SPD):• Scintillator plane parallel to beam
axis• Segmented transversally in square
cells• Provides measurement of global
track multiplicity in events (used at the hardware trigger)
5
• Main results concerning Central Exclusive Production (CEP), made possible thanks to:– Detector coverage up to high rapidities (h=5)– Low pile-up: large fraction (21% of luminosity) of events with a
single interaction used for simplicity– Flexible trigger:
• Hardware level: muon detectors and calorimeters• Software level: full event information to perform analysis-like selections
– Excellent particle identification, momentum and vertex resolution
– Can detect low momentum particles, and reconstruct hadrons down to almost pT=0.
Diffractive studies at LHCb
6
• Elastic process, protons are intact and fly in the beam-pipe• Exchange of colour-less objects (photon, pomeron)
Central exclusive di-muon
Di-photon fusion g-pomeron fusion Di-pomeron fusion
Generators: LPAIR STARLight SuperCHIC[A.G. Shamov, V.I. Telnov, NIM A494 (2002) 51]
[S.R. Klein and J. Nystrand, PRL 92 (2004) 142003]
[L.A. Harland-Lang, V.A. Khoze, M.G. Ryskin, W.J. Stirling, EPJC 65 (2010) 433]
• Process signature: isolated muons in acceptance + rapidity gap• 36pb-1 of 2010 data (7 TeV) [JPhysG 40 (2013) 045001] and 930pb-1 of 2011
data (7 TeV) [NEW: LHCb-PAPER-2013-059]
7
• Hardware trigger:– 1 muon with pT>400 MeV, or dimuon with each pT>80 MeV– Number of SPD hits < 20
• Software trigger:– Dimuon with mass > 2.9 GeV, or with mass < 1 GeV and pT <
900 MeV and distance of closest approach < 150 mm.• Offline:
– Two identified muons in 2<h<4.5– No photons, no other forward tracks: Dy=3.5– No backward tracks: Dy=1.7– Dimuon mass in 65 MeV mass window of the J/y and y(2S)
masses.
J/y and y(2S) selection
8
Event Display
9
Backward tracks veto
All events passing trigger After backward track vetoJPhysG 40 (2013) 045001
10
Invariant massesLHCb-PAPER-2013-059
• Fit invariant mass spectra:– Signal: Crystall Ball function, 55985 J/y and 1565 y(2S)– Exponential for combinatorial background
• Background contamination in signal windows:– (0.8±0.1)% for J/y– (17.0±0.3)% for y(2S)
11
• J/y from y(2S) decays:– Suppressed by the 2 track requirement– Residual estimated with SuperCHICgenerator:
(2.5±0.2)% of J/y come from y(2S).
• J/y from cc decays: (g undetected)– Suppressed by the requirement of no photon– Residual estimated with SuperCHIC generator:
(7.6±0.9)% of J/y come from cc.
• y(2S) from X(3872) decays: (g undetected):– Estimated: (2.0±2.0)%
Feed-down
LHCb-PAPER-2013-059
12
• Largest background from inelastic production with extra particles outside of LHCb
• Estimated using pT2 shapes measured at HERA,
to distinguish « exclusive » and « inelastic » components
• Feed-down pT2 shapes taken from data
• Combinatorial background shapes taken in mass sidebands.
Inelastic contamination
13
Inelastic contaminationLHCb-PAPER-2013-059
Purity of sample in exclusively produced:• J/y: (59.2±1.2)%• y(2S): (52±7)%
14
Systematic Uncertainties
LHCb-PAPER-2013-059
15
• Cross-section x branching fraction in 2<h +, -m m <4.5:
Results (J/y and y(2S))
LHCb-PAPER-2013-059
6.5
16
Cross-sections (J/y and y(2S))LHCb-PAPER-2013-059
Predictions from Jones, Martin, Ryskin and Teubner [arXiv: 1307.7099]
J/y
y(2S)
17
Cross-sections (J/y and y(2S))LHCb-PAPER-2013-059
Saturation models from Gay Ducati, Griep, Machado [arXiv: 1305.4611] and Motyka and Watt [PRD78 014023]
J/y
y(2S)
18
• To compare with HERA measurements, the differential cross-section is calculated in 10 rapidity bins and reweighted by photon flux:
Results (J/y ds/dy)
• Two solutions for W in each rapidity bin
• Possible deviation from power law, which can be explained by higher order effects and saturation effects.
LHCb-PAPER-2013-059
19
• Selection: (36pb-1 of 2010 data – 7 TeV)
– Dimuon + g with ET>200 MeV in ECAL,
– No extra track: 194 events• Background:– Inelastic: same method as J/y– Feed-down from y(2S) estimated
from STARLight– Total purity: (39±13)%
• Results
cc production
LHCb-CONF-2011-022
20
• With di-muon: – More data available for the cc analysis– Measurements of Y(nS) – 8 TeV data set to be exploited
• Hadronic final states to reconstruct other hadrons: – open charm, – cc hh.➝
• pA/Ap data recorded in 2013 to be analyzed• 25 ns bunch spacing in 2015 will mean lower pile-
up and higher usable integrated luminosity
Future prospects
21
• J/y, y(2S) and cc central exclusive production measured at LHCb
• Improved results with larger statistics are imminent
• New ideas for further analyses: active area within LHCb.
Conclusions