Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Data
Fluorescence was normalized by optical density, subtracting
background fluorescence and absorbance of PBS. Bars indicate
average of samples under identical conditions. Error bars indicate
standard deviation.
IntroductionWe introduced a CO-
sensing mechanism into the
bacteria E. coli by using the
CooA transcription activator
and pCooF promoter to
regulate expression of the
pchBA and BSMT proteins,
converting the endogenous
molecule chorismate into
methy l sa l i c y l a te , t he
wintergreen fragrance, in
t h e p r e s e n c e o f C O .
Problem:
• CO: toxic, colorless,
odorless
• Natural disasters
• Power outages
• Gasoline-fueled devices
to generate power
• CO build-up (CO
poisoning)
• Current detectors are
inaccessible for
blind/deaf
Solution:
• Fragrance-producing
bacterial CO sensor
• Energy-independent
• Transportable
• Cost-effective
• Practical in power
outages/natural
disasters where no
power is available
• Sensory-based:
accessible to disabled
.
MethodologyPreparation
• Gibson assembly: T7-GFP in pCDF, pCooF-GFP in pCDF, and T7-CooA in pCR2.1
• Vectors: pCR2.1-TOPO TA cloning vector (AmpR) and pCDFDuet-1 (SpecR)
• Sequence verification in OneShot TOP10 cells
• E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells were transformed with constructs
• Anaerobic chamber: radiation waste container, inlet/outlet adaptors drill-taped, Vaseline seal
Experiment
• Cultures grown in LB to OD600 with 20% glucose
• Resuspended with IPTG
• CORM-2 added at 0, 50, 100, 200 and 500 uM
• Induced for 2 hours under anaerobic conditions
• Cells washed/resuspended in PBS (phosphate-buffered saline)
• Measure fluorescence intensity (600 nm, 25 flashes)
Constructs
• Experiment = T7-CooA, pCoof-gfp
• Negative control 1 = DE3 cells only
• Negative control 2 = pCoof-gfp (no transcription factor - shows leakage of pCoof promoter)
• Positive control = T7-gfp
AuthorsIsaree Pitaktong, Dylan Danzeiser, Kisha Patel, Pia Sen, Sam Gunn, James
Choi, Ella Pettichord, Sally Jung, Oliver Zhao, Anna Savelyeva, Jasmine
Stone, Caleb Ellington, Anusha Vavilikolanu, Ujwal Punyamurtula, Sofia
Valdivieso, Travis Colbert
Conclusions / Future Plans• CO detection construct itself did not fully function
• Wintergreen circuit and full construct was not tested
• Errors may have influenced our experimental results
For the future:
• Anaerobic testing chamber with minimal oxygen content (prevent leakage: manufactured
chamber, using rubber seal)
• Bacteria plated on blood agar plates, minimizing oxygen content
• More checkpoints – verify sensor functionality, increasing project efficiency / troubleshooting
• Recording data and events more in a timely manner (electronic lab books) – team up-to-date
• Repeat CORM dosage curve – confirm optimal amount CORM in bacterial culture (better
readings/analysis of data)
Possible Errors• Failure of CORM (Carbon Monoxide Releasing
Molecule) to produce significant amount of CO
• Detector failing to express
• Detector failing to function
• Anaerobic chamber not fully flushed (oxygen
remaining, dissolved oxygen content also affects)
or may have had leakages, preventing it from being
a completely anaerobic chamber
• CORM is cytotoxic in aerobic conditions (unreliable,
possible cytotoxicity decreased transformation
efficiency)
Liberal Arts and Science Academy iGEM 2015
Data Analysis• Slight increase in GFP expression from 0 to 500 uM
CO-RM
• Negative controls show variation insignificant (GFP
expression approx. equal in CO dependent and
independent constructs)
• Anaerobic chamber (above)
• Entire construct in Geneious (right)
Acknowledgments2010 METU Turkey Team for stemming the use of the carbon monoxide pathway;
2006 MIT team for stemming the use of the wintergreen pathway.
Dr. Andrew Ellington, Dr. Dennis Mishler and all the members of the Ellington Lab at the
University of Texas at Austin for guiding us through the design and experimental process.