28
Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – [email protected]

Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Integrating Electronic Security into theControl Systems Environment:

differences IT vs. Control Systems

Enzo M. Tieghi – [email protected]

Page 2: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Security IT & Control System Security: where are we?

Page 3: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Some cases about industrial -infrastructure Cyber

incidents: In January, 2003, the SQL Slammer Worm penetrated a computer network at Ohio’s Davis-Besse nuclear power plant and disabled a safety monitoring system for nearly five hours; SQL Slammer Worm downed one utility’s critical SCADA network in US; another utility lost its Frame Relay Network used for communications; some petrochemical plants lost Human Machine Interfaces (HMIs) and data historians; a 911 call center was taken offline; Airline flights were delayed and cancelled

in 2001, a series of cyber attacks were conducted on a computerized waste water treatment system by a disgruntled contractor in Queensland, Australia. One of these attacks caused the diversion of millions of gallons of raw sewage into a local river and park. There were 46 intrusions before the perpetrator was arrested.

Page 4: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Some cases about industrial -infrastructure Cyber

incidents: In September, 2001, a teenager allegedly hacked into a computer server at the Port of Houston: the port’s web service, which contained crucial data for shipping pilots, mooring companies and support firms responsible for helping ships navigate in and out of the harbor, was left inaccessible

1997: Shutdown at traffic air control system tower at Worchester Regional Airport (MA) USA

Italy 2004: Sasser halts 40 PCs in production plant of leading pharmaceutical company (batches to rework, week-end spent to restart plants, reinstall and revalidate systems etc.)

Water distribution SCADA system in California attacked and down (2005)

… No official statistical source: database with 20-30

tracked incidents in 2002-2004 in California (USA) Database at BCIT (CA) in construction

Page 5: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

The 3 security faces

Phisical Security (Perimeter):Guard on duty, gates, ports, etc.

Human factor Security (Organization):Security policySecurity proceduresAwareness and training

Cyber-Security (Technology):AntivirusAcces control, authentication, …Firewalls, …

Page 6: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Internet

Network Vulnerability: examples

Controller or PLC

Process Control Network(Proprietary or Ethernet)

HMIControl System Application Server

Ethernet

SAP

Corporate Network

MailServer

Browser Clients

Desktops

Plant Network

Historian

Web Server

MES

Firewall

Remote Access Server

MobileOperator

ResourceConstraints

Wireless AP

DisgruntledEmployee

Browser Malware

Email Viruses

IM Downloads

Protocol Vulnerabilities

VPN Penetration

VulnerabilityExploit

FirewallPenetration

Unauthorized Access

Vendor Diagnostics

POTSRemote Access

EMS/ Indirect System Penetration

ContractorHacking/Malware

Flat Networks

Page 7: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

eSecurity in control systems: industrial and infrastructure

consideration about security (not only “Safety”)

11 items why Security in control systems (DCS, PLC, SCADA/HMI, plant networks, etc. )

is different from IT Security

Page 8: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

BS7799 vs. ISA-99.00.01Comparison of

Objectives

Manufacturing and Control Systems

Traditional IT Systems

Priority

Availability Confidentiality

Integrity

Confidentiality

Integrity

Availability

Page 9: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

ANSI/ISA-95 Functional Hierarchy

Level 4

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Business Planning & Logistics

Plant Production Scheduling,Operational Management, etc

Manufacturing Operations Management

Dispatching Production, Detailed ProductionScheduling, Reliability Assurance, ...

BatchControl

DiscreteControl

ContinuousControl

1 - Sensing the production process, manipulating the production process

2 - Monitoring, supervisory control and automated control of the production process

3 - Work flow / recipe control to produce the desired end products. Maintaining records and optimizing the production process.

Time FrameDays, Shifts, hours, minutes, seconds

4 - Establishing the basic plant schedule -production, material use, delivery, and shipping. Determining inventory levels.

Time FrameMonths, weeks, days

Level 0 0 - The actual production process

Level 4

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Business Planning & Logistics

Plant Production Scheduling,Operational Management, etc

Manufacturing Operations Management

Dispatching Production, Detailed ProductionScheduling, Reliability Assurance, ...

BatchControl

DiscreteControl

ContinuousControl

1 - Sensing the production process, manipulating the production process

2 - Monitoring, supervisory control and automated control of the production process

3 - Work flow / recipe control to produce the desired end products. Maintaining records and optimizing the production process.

Time FrameDays, Shifts, hours, minutes, seconds

4 - Establishing the basic plant schedule -production, material use, delivery, and shipping. Determining inventory levels.

Time FrameMonths, weeks, days

Level 0 0 - The actual production process

Page 10: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

ANSI/ISA—TR99.00.02—2004

Art. 6.5Special Considerations for Manufacturing

and Control SystemsManufacturing and Control System electronic security plans and programs are consistent with, and build on, existing IT security experience, programs, and practices. However, there are critical operational differences between IT and Manufacturing and Control Systems that influence how specific measures should be applied. (……).

Page 11: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Why eSec is different - 1

Differing risk management goalsRirsk Definition: Human safety and fault

tolerance to prevent loss of life or endangerment of public health or confidence, loss of equipment, loss of intellectual property, or lost or damaged product.

Page 12: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa? /2

Differing architecture security focus In a typical IT system, the primary focus of

security is protecting the information stored on the central server.

In manufacturing systems, the situation is reversed. Edge clients (e.g., PLC, operator station, or DCS controller) are typically more important than the central server.

Why eSec is different - 2

Page 13: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa?/3

Differing availability requirements Many manufacturing processes are continuous in

nature. Unexpected outages of systems that control manufacturing processes are not acceptable. Exhaustive pre-deployment testing is essential to ensure high availability for the Manufacturing and Control System. In addition to unexpected outages, many control systems cannot be easily stopped and started without affecting production. In some cases, the products produced or equipment being used is more important than the information being relayed. The requirement for high availability, reliability, and maintainability reduces the effectiveness of IT strategies like rebooting.

Why eSec is different - 3

Page 14: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa?/4

Unintended consequencesManufacturing and Control Systems can be

very complex in the way that they interact with physical processes. All security functions integrated into the process control system must be tested to prove that they do not introduce unacceptable vulnerabilities. Adding any physical or logical component to the system may reduce reliability of the control system, but the resulting reliability should be kept to acceptable levels.

Why eSec is different -4

Page 15: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa?/5

Time critical responsesFor some systems, automated response time

or system response to human interaction is critical.

For example, emergency actions on regulatory process control systems should not be hampered by requiring password authentication and authorization.

Information flow must not be interrupted or compromised.

Why eSec is different- 5

Page 16: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa?/6

Differing response time requirementsManufacturing and Control Systems are

generally time critical Delay is not acceptable for the delivery of

information, and high throughput is typically not essential.

Why eSec is different -6

Page 17: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa?/7

System software Differing and “custom” operating systems and

applications may not tolerate typical IT practices.

Networks are often more complex and require a different level of expertise (e.g., control networks are typically managed by control engineers, not IT personnel).

Software and hardware applications are more difficult to upgrade in a control system network.

Many systems may not have desired features including encryption capabilities, error logging, and password protection.

Why eSec is different -7

Page 18: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa?/8

Resource constraintsControl systems and their real time operating

systems are resource constrained systems that do not include typical IT security technologies.

There may not be available computing resources to retrofit these security technologies.

Why eSec is different -8

Page 19: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa?/9

Information integrity In-bound information is highly essential to

the control system operation. It is important to take practical precautions

to eliminate malicious in-bound information in an effort to maintain control operation.

Why eSec is different -9

Page 20: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa?/10

CommunicationsCommunication protocols and media

used by control systems environments are typically different from the generic IT environment, and may be proprietary.

Examples include radio telemetry using asynchronous serial protocols and proprietary communication networks.

Why eSec is different -10

Page 21: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa?/11

Software UpdatesSecurity patches cannot always be

implemented on a timely basis because software changes need to be thoroughly tested by the vendor of the manufacturing control application and the end user of the application before being implemented

Change management control is necessary to maintain integrity of the control systems.

Why eSec is different - 11

Page 22: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Perché la Sicurezza è diversa?

These differences require careful assessment by Manufacturing and Control System experts working in conjunction with security and IT personnel.

This team of people should carefully evaluate the applicability of IT and specific Manufacturing and Control Systems electronic security features, including thorough testing before application, where necessary.

Why eSec is different: final

Page 23: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Network Segregation

“Rings of Defense” for Corporate and SCADA Networks – www.dyonyx.com

Page 24: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

What to do: ad hoc methodology and tools

Industrial Security Assessment Industrial Security Vulnerability Tests Industrial Security Policy Industrial Incident Response Plans Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery

Plans Industrial Protection (Industrial IDS/IPS) Monitoring and Managed Services for

Industry Audit

Page 25: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Where Control Systems are?

Everywhere…Industrial but also InfrastructureProduction and Distribution: Water, Oil &

Gas, Power, etc.Traffic control: Railways, Highways,

Tunnels, Air, etc. Buildings: Airports, Hospitals, Schools,

Governament, Research Centers, Universities, Municipalities, etc.

TLCs

Page 26: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

What’s moving…

“21 Steps to improve Cyber Security of SCADA Networks”(USA White House)

“Common vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure control systems”(U.S. Dept. Of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration)

Securing Process Control Systems - IT Security (European Commission)

Page 27: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

Industrial security and international standards

•BS7799-ISO27000 Information security management systems – Specification with guidance for use•ISO/IEC 17799:2005 Information Technology – Code of practice for information security management •ANSI/ISA SP99 TR1 Security for Manufacturing and Control Systems•ANSI/ISA SP99 TR2 Integrating Electronic Security into Manufacturing and Control Systems Environment•ISO/IEC 15408 Common Criteria•NIST System Protection Profile for Industrial Control Systems (SPP-ICS)•CIDX Chemical Industry Data Exchange - Cibersecurity Vulnerability Assessment Methodology (VAM) Guidance•ISPE/GAMP4 – Good Automated Manufacturing Practices – App. O Guideline for Automated System Security•NERC standards •AGA standards

Page 28: Integrating Electronic Security into the Control Systems Environment: differences IT vs. Control Systems Enzo M. Tieghi – etieghi@visionautomation.it

…need more information?

www.visionautomation.it

Enzo M. Tieghi - [email protected]