INSPIRING LEARNING AND SKILLS - FutureQuals · INSPIRING LEARNING AND SKILLS. TM. English Speaking, Listening and Communication Guidance Version 3 - March 2019. English Speaking,

www.futurequals.com

Future QualsINSPIRING LEARNING AND SKILLS

TM

English Speaking, Listening and Communication Guidance

Version 3 - March 2019

English Speaking, Listening and Communication Guidance_V3

Version Control Information

Document details

Document name Speaking, Listening and Communication Guidance

Purpose of document To provide information, guidance and requirements for centres who deliver English Functional Skills Qualifications.

Change applied to existing version


Document owner Product Development Team

Version history

New version number after amendment

Date amended Section Details of change/s


January 2019 Throughout Updates to procedures in light of changes to the assessment process for SLC.

New Record of Learner Achievement Form.

Change to the way XAMS is used to now only require learner outcomes to be entered.


March 2019 Level 1/Level 2 activities

Amendments to the evidence requirements for moderation and retention.

English Speaking, Listening and Communication Guidance_V2 1

English Speaking, Listening and Communication Guidance Contents

Speaking, listening and communication assessment ............................................................................ 2

Guidance on setting and delivering internal assessment tasks ............................................................ 2

Equality, access and inclusion ............................................................................................................... 3

The Skill Standard: Level 1 ..................................................................................................................... 4

The Skill Standard: Level 2 ..................................................................................................................... 5

Level 1 Speaking, Listening and Communication .................................................................................. 7

Assessment Instructions ........................................................................................................................ 7

Making and recording assessment judgements .................................................................................... 7

Level 1 - Two separate discussions within different contexts (Activity 1 and 2) .................................. 8

Guidance on Activity One: Level 1 ....................................................................................................... 12

Level 2 Speaking, Listening and Communication ................................................................................ 16

Assessment instructions ...................................................................................................................... 16

Making and recording assessment judgements .................................................................................. 16

Level 2 - Two separate discussions within different contexts (Activity 1 and 2) ................................ 17

Guidance for Activity One – Level 2 .................................................................................................... 21

Guidance on Activity Two: Level 2 ...................................................................................................... 28

Activity 3 - Effective presentations at Level 2 ..................................................................................... 29

Guidance on Activity Three: Level 2 .................................................................................................... 32

Template A .......................................................................................................................................... 33

Template B .......................................................................................................................................... 36

Appendix 1: Functional Skills Report on Observation of Internal Assessment – English Speaking, Listening and Communication ............................................................................................................. 40

Appendix 2: Functional Skills English Speaking, Listening and Communication Internal Quality Assurance Tracking Form .................................................................................................................... 42

Appendix 3: Functional Skills Internal Quality Assurance Feedback to Assessor Form ...................... 43

Appendix 4: Speaking, Listening and Communication Assessment Internal Quality Assurance Panel Form .................................................................................................................................................... 44


Speaking, listening and communication assessment This guidance outlines the Speaking, Listening and Communication assessment requirements for FutureQuals Functional Skills English at Level 1 and Level 2. This document outlines the activities which can be carried out to meet the Speaking, Listening and Communication standards, and coverage and range statements. Centres are able to pick topics and contextualise these activities in order to meet the interests and/or needs of their learners. Suggestions for possible topics are given with each task. This document must be read in conjunction with the Level 1 and Level 2 Functional Skills English Qualification Specification and the Functional Skills Operational Handbook. An overview of SLC learner requirements at each level is set out below: Qualification Requirement English Level 1 Two discussions

English Level 2 Two discussions One presentation

Guidance on setting and delivering internal assessment tasks Task-setting: All centres must have a consistent process for setting tasks that are contextualised to be relevant, meaningful and appropriate to the level of the learners, which allow for adequate coverage of the set topic, and which provide sufficient opportunity to demonstrate proficiency at the level against all of the criteria, in a manner which is fair and consistent for all learners. Task-taking: All centres must have a clearly defined procedure for the delivery of the assessment activity which meets the needs of the learners, which allows for adequate coverage of the set topic, and which provides sufficient opportunity to demonstrate proficiency at the level against all of the criteria, in a manner which is fair and consistent for all learners.

The minimum number of learners that would constitute a group for discussion purposes should be a minimum of 3 but no more than 6 (not including the assessor). The tasks themselves will vary depending on the nature of the topics set, and the context or circumstances in which they are assessed, however, the assessment requirements and level of demand must be consistent for all learners and must comply with the Functional Skills regulatory criteria.

The tasks can be taken at any point deemed appropriate during the Functional Skills Qualification programme but this should be based upon an informed judgement that the learner is operating at the level to be assessed.

The assessment task must follow the guidance contained in the Speaking, listening and communication (SLC) assessment template.

Task-marking and internal quality assurance: All centres must have a consistent approach to marking the assessment activity and for ensuring that standards applied in marking are consistent


for all of their learners. For the first six cohorts, or a minimum of 10 learners, 100% of assessments are sampled by FutureQuals’ moderators. Centres must upload to their secure SharePoint site the following key documents for each cohort:

1. Completed Records of Learner Achievement Forms (scanned and uploaded as separate documents, not combined as one PDF)

2. Copies of audio or video recording(s) 3. Completed IQA report(s)

Following this a minimum of 10% of assessments should be observed by an internal quality assurer (IQA) to ensure they are being conducted in accordance with our requirements. These observations should be completed using the Observation of Internal Assessment. When more than one assessor carries out the assessments, the observations should be spread proportionately. Following the completion of the assessments, an internal quality assurance panel must convene in which the assessors and the IQA discuss outcomes and ensure the Functional Skills standard and mark schemes have been applied consistently across all learners. Borderline achieved/not achieved learners’ results may be adjusted at this time. The meeting must be recorded using the Assessment Internal Quality Assurance Panel Form. IQA reports should be made available to FutureQuals’ EQAs on request during any monitoring visit or external quality assurance activities. The assessment process will be subject to external quality assurance and moderation by FutureQuals. Moderation takes place after the Record of Learner Achievement Forms have been uploaded to the centre’s secure SharePoint site, and the assessment outcome for each learner has been recorded in XAMS. All Record of Learner Achievement Forms must be retained by the Centre at least 3 years from the end of the year to which they relate. Forms that relate to Internal Quality Assurance including the Assessment Internal Quality Assurance Panel Form can be found in the Appendices at the rear of this guidance document. Equality, access and inclusion Functional Skills Qualifications have been designed to be inclusive for the full range of learners. It is important that all centres understand the expectations for Speaking, listening and communication in this context. This section outlines these requirements, based upon the Functional Skills regulatory criteria.

Speaking, listening and communication (SLC) within Functional Skills Qualifications are defined as non-written communication, normally conducted face-to-face and in line with Ofqual’s Controlled Assessment Regulations for Functional Skills. This document can be found here.

In exceptional circumstances, assessment may take place remotely, provided that the medium through which remote assessment takes place:

• does not create barriers to achievement and success

• enables learners to demonstrate achievement against the full range of standards using the full range of permitted strategies, and ensures the arrangements in place to maintain

https://www.futurequals.com/qualifications/sectors/Functional%20Skills/FutureQuals%20Functional%20Skills/FutureQuals_functional_skills.html


security before, during and after the administration of the assessment.

The term ‘speaking, listening and communication’, as used by these standards, is intended to be interpreted in a broadly inclusive way and is not intended to create any unnecessary barriers to learners with speech or hearing impairment.

The needs of individual learners will vary but, as guidance, the term should be interpreted as meaning communication, discussion and presentation that:

• Can include use of sign language (e.g. British Sign Language, sign-supported English) provided this is made accessible to all participants in the discussion. (It is recognised that BSL is a language in its own right and not a form of English. BSL is, however, permitted as an alternative to English for the assessment of speaking, listening and communication where BSL is the learner’s normal way of communicating in the contexts described by the regulatory criteria). No other languages are permitted as alternatives to English;

• Can include access to augmentative speech equipment and such software as constitutes the learner’s "usual way of working";

• Does not depend solely on the use of written language or require the individual/s with whom the learner is communicating to be able to read (as these skills are covered by the requirements for reading and writing).

The Skill Standard: Level 1

Take full part in formal and informal discussions and exchanges that include unfamiliar subjects.

• Make relevant and extended contributions to discussions, allowing for and responding to others’ input;

• Prepare for and contribute to the formal discussion of ideas and opinions; • Make different kinds of contributions to discussions; • Present information/points of view clearly and in appropriate language.

To present reasonable opportunities for learners to demonstrate their proficiency and to provide sufficient evidence of this standard at Level 1, the assessment will comprise two assessment tasks. This ensures that learners have reasonable opportunities to demonstrate, for example, "relevant and extended contributions to discussions", demonstrating "different kinds of contributions to discussions", engagement with both familiar and unfamiliar subject matter, and contributions to both formal and informal discussions and exchanges, some of which are prepared for, while others entirely spontaneous, all of which must be in accordance with the assessment criteria.

To be deemed proficient at the level, learners must be able to consistently demonstrate the full range of speaking, listening and communication standards defined at the level.

At Level 1, the learner is expected to demonstrate this performance evidence in two separate assessment activities: an informal discussion, where learners demonstrate the relevant criteria without preparation or pre-determined format or structure, and a more formal discussion of ideas and opinions, which has been prepared for in advance.


The Skill Standard: Level 2

Make a range of contributions to discussions in a range of contexts, including those that are unfamiliar, and make effective presentations.

• Consider complex information and give a relevant, cogent response in appropriate language • Present information and ideas clearly and persuasively to others • Adapt contributions to suit audience, purpose and situation • Make significant contributions to discussions, taking a range of roles and helping to move

discussion forward.

To present reasonable opportunities for learners to demonstrate their proficiency and to provide sufficient evidence of this standard at Level 2, the assessment will comprise several assessment tasks. This ensures that learners have reasonable opportunities to demonstrate, for example, "a range of contributions to discussions" which can be evidenced "in a range of contexts, including those which are unfamiliar", as well as their ability to make "effective presentations" in accordance with the assessment criteria. To be deemed proficient at the level, learners must be able to consistently demonstrate the full range of speaking, listening and communication standards defined at the level.

At Level 2, the learner is expected to demonstrate this performance evidence in three separate assessment activities: two separate formal discussions, which present different contexts in which a range of contributions can be made by the learner; and a separate formal presentation.


English Speaking, Listening and Communication Registration to Certification Process Flow


Level 1 Speaking, Listening and Communication Assessment Instructions Assessors must assess individual performance (albeit in a group context and in relation to the input, contributions and behaviour of others) against the full set of criteria to determine whether they are proficient at the level. The assessors’ judgements as to whether a learner has achieved/not achieved the component must be recorded in the online XAMS system against the learner’s record. The Record of Learner Achievement templates provided in this document reflect the information that must be provided. These forms support centres in recording judgements prior to internal quality assurance and entering final results into XAMS. Making and recording assessment judgements 1. Assessors are required to verify a learner’s identity, and authenticate that the work

presented for assessment is the learner’s own. 2. Assessors must complete individual performance, criterion-based judgements for each

learner in all activities. This is completed on the Record of Learner Achievement Form (Template A).

3. For the first six cohorts or a minimum of 10 learners*, all assessment session should either be audio or video recorded as well as the assessor completing the Record of Learner Achievement.

4. Assessors evaluating an individual must judge whether a learner consistently meets the performance threshold (i.e. Achieved Level 1) while allowing for the variability and unpredictability inherent in group discussions.

5. The assessment must produce a pass/achieve or fail/not achieve outcome. Assessors must make careful judgements about whether the learner's performance meets the criteria. Only learners who have had a "Yes" (or Y) against all of the "AC Achieved" statements in all activities associated with the level the learner is undertaking, will be awarded a Pass.

6. Once all assessment evidence has been captured on the Record of Learner Achievement Form, Assessors must sign and date the form. By signing the Record of Learner Achievement Form, the Assessor is confirming that the assessment has been conducted according the FutureQuals required controlled conditions.

7. Centres must scan all hard copies of the Record of Learner Achievement Form and these should be stored securely within the centre for a period of three years.

8. Centres must submit all Record of Learner Achievement Forms to FutureQuals via a secure method (i.e. upload these into the centre’s Huddle folder).

9. Assessors must enter the learner’s final assessment outcome (Achieved/Not Achieved) into the required field against the learner’s individual record in XAMS.

10. All learners scheduled and being presented for assessment in the same cohort will appear in the same XAMS screen.

*For centres that are approved to deliver both Level 1 and Level 2 qualifications, the total of six cohorts or a minimum of 10 learners can be combined and split between the two levels. For example, 3 cohorts of Level 1 learners and 3 cohorts of Level 2 learners.


Level 1 - Two separate discussions within different contexts (Activity 1 and 2) One formal and one informal discussion

Guidance for assessors

10–15 minutes in duration for each activity Conditions Topics

The duration of the two discussions may vary slightly but should be as far as possible consistent for learners being assessed at the same level. At least one of the discussions should be a minimum of 15 minutes in duration, and both of them must allow adequate time for the topic to be covered and the assessment criteria to be demonstrated. The discussions and exchanges must allow for the consistent assessment of the skills defined in the regulatory criteria, irrespective of when the assessment takes place. The nature of discussions means that unpredictable elements may be present but it is important that centres ensure that the assessment tasks and conditions provide fair and equivalent opportunities for all learners to demonstrate their level of proficiency against the skill standards. The formal discussion will be based upon an agreed topic which learners should have prepared for, while the informal discussion should be based upon a topic for which learners have not been able to prepare, although it may be relevant to the programme or context. While the duration of discussions may vary slightly, it is important that this type of variation is limited and doesn't present different opportunities to demonstrate the standard across assessments. Centres can agree suitable topics for the discussions but they must provide appropriate opportunities for learners to demonstrate each of the skills at the level. One of the topics must be agreed in advance to allow for preparation while the other must be introduced at the time of the assessment to allow for an informal discussion topic that has not been prepared for or rehearsed in any way. The topics should ideally be related to the learning programme and present opportunities for applying the skills in purposeful and 'real-life' contexts, being based upon a vocationally relevant subject or issue, for example.


Preparation Evidence

Agreed topics should be straightforward but substantive and engaging. They must provide opportunities for learners to make relevant and extended contributions to discussions, to make different kinds of contributions, and to present information/points of view clearly and in appropriate language. One of the discussions must introduce unfamiliar subject matter to the learner, providing a context in which the learner must demonstrate the relevant skills in order to engage effectively with novel and unfamiliar content. The two discussions must not be the same, with functional proficiency being measured across both formal and informal contexts at this level, presenting distinct challenges within which learners are expected to demonstrate the relevant skills. Further information on suitable topics is available in the guidance section. Learners should be allowed to prepare for only the formal discussion, with prior notice of the discussion topic. Learners should anticipate spending at least 2 hours on preparation for the topic, to allow sufficient time for researching and reading relevant information or sources and producing preparatory notes (or a plan) about the main points which they wish to communicate, for example, and draw upon to demonstrate knowledge and understanding, and specific facts, dates, ideas, evidence or references which they may wish or need to use to support their views and respond effectively in the discussion. Learners may use prompts from this preparation but external support should be restricted to preparation stages. Outcomes for individual learner performance must be completed in the XAMS system in order for the component to be awarded. Use of the Record of Learner Achievement Form is mandatory during assessment delivery and internal quality assurance. All assessment evidence should be logged on Record of Learner Achievement Form for each learner undertaking the assessment.


For the first six cohorts or a minimum of 10 learners *, all Record of Learner Achievement Forms and either audio or video recordings of the assessment session and the IQA’s report must be uploaded to the centre’s secure SharePoint site and will be moderated by FutureQuals. Thereafter, a minimum of 10% of assessments will be moderated, however, this percentage is determined and reviewed by FutureQuals. Following the internal centre assessment and the FutureQuals moderation of six cohorts (with a minimum of at least ten learners in total), and confirmation from FutureQuals, all assessments should continue to be recorded (audio or video). These recordings will however not need to be uploaded to SharePoint but must be retained, along with all IQA sampling records, by the approved centre for at least three years from the assessment date. All Record of Learner Achievement Forms must be uploaded for every learner.

Although there is no requirement to submit these recordings to FutureQuals as part of the moderation process, access to these records may be requested at any time during unannounced visits and/or quality reviews. Centres are responsible for checking that all assessment session recordings are fit-for-purpose. If a centre identifies that a recording of an assessment session has failed, then it must notify FutureQuals immediately. Centres have a maximum of 30 days to upload assessment results to XAMS from the date the learner undertakes the assessment.



Level 1 Activity One –Formal discussion Guidance for Assessors using individual performance criterion-based judgements This guidance can be used when assessing if candidates achieve or do not achieve Level 1 standards. Below Level 1 Y/N Achieved Level 1 Y/N Preparation is not always evident or sufficient. Contributes to the discussion of ideas and opinions, but contributions are not consistently effective, clear, or in appropriate registers for formal discussion.

Prepares for and contributes effectively to the formal discussion of ideas and opinions;

Makes contributions to discussions, but may be infrequent and hesitant, not necessarily relevant, and not extended or sufficiently detailed or sustained. Contributions often do not recognise the contributions of other participants, or allow for and respond to others' input.

Makes relevant and extended contributions to formal discussions, allowing for and responding to others’ input;

Demonstrates only a limited ability to adapt or vary contributions to discussions.

Makes different kinds of contributions to formal discussions;

Information presented is often not clear or delivered in appropriate language.

Presents information clearly and in appropriate language.

Points of view are often not clearly expressed or delivered in appropriate language.

Presents points of view clearly and in appropriate language.


Guidance on Activity One: Level 1 Example topic: “Voting is a democratic right in the United Kingdom. It is very important that everyone exercises this right to vote”. “By voting, we demonstrate our willingness to be active, positive citizens, and ensure that our views are represented in government”. Discuss This topic is potentially quite challenging at the level but engages reasonably familiar content and so will be appropriate for a formal discussion, which requires preparation, and will ensure that learners are able to demonstrate the full range of skills. Learners will be familiar with the general concept of voting, and the statement provides additional elements which will stimulate deeper thinking about the topic and provide ideas to consider further in appropriately supported, preparation time, such as what is meant by democratic rights, or how does (or does not) voting ensure that one's views are represented in government. The topic has various dimensions but remains sufficiently straightforward at Level 1 to present an appropriate opportunity to demonstrate proficiency at the level. It is not too difficult or complex to consider in advance, without having to engage in time-consuming research, in order to be able to express ideas, thoughts and opinions (and possibly some relevant information and facts), and importantly, to be able to allow for, consider, and respond effectively to the ideas, views and opinions of others participating in the discussion. However, it is sufficiently substantive to allow learners to make relevant, extended contributions, to engage effectively in the discussion of ideas and opinions, to make different kinds of contributions to discussions, and to present information and points of view clearly and in appropriate language


Level 1 Activity Two – Informal discussion Guidance for Assessors using individual performance criterion-based judgements This guidance can be used when assessing if candidates achieve or do not achieve Level 1 standards. Below Level 1 Y/N Achieved Level 1 Y/N Contributes to the discussion of ideas and opinions, but contributions are not consistently effective, clear, or in appropriate register for discussion.

Contributes effectively to the informal discussion of ideas and opinions;

Makes contributions to discussions, but may be infrequent and hesitant, not necessarily relevant, and not extended or sufficiently detailed or sustained. Contributions often do not recognise the contributions of other participants, or allow for and respond to others' input.

Makes relevant and extended contributions to informal discussions, allowing for and responding to others’ input;

Demonstrates only a limited ability to adapt or vary contributions to discussions.

Makes different kinds of contributions to informal discussions;

Information presented is often not clear or delivered in appropriate language.

Presents information clearly and in appropriate language.

Points of view are often not clearly expressed or delivered in appropriate language.

Presents points of view clearly and in appropriate language.


Guidance for Activity 2

The informal example topic: A more flexible, open-ended topic might be based on the concept of Leadership. It could be introduced in a way that is relevant to the learners' programme, employment, or educational programme, or might be related to a topical event. Alternatively, it could be presented as a statement that expresses a point of view which is likely to stimulate a lively, informal discussion without preparation. For example, consider the following quote about leadership and discuss its merits: "Strong leadership is vital in business today. It requires nerves of steel and a thick skin to be an effective leader, so that you can overcome resistance from those around you, outsmart enemies and critics, and ensure that you do not have your vision undermined either by the objections of your opponents or the inevitable disagreements that arise in any group situation." While preparation is not required, if you were to introduce a more detailed statement such as the one outlined above, it would be appropriate to spend a few minutes prior to the start of the informal discussion ensuring that everyone involved has fully understood the topic and is ready to discuss it in more detail. Another example of an appropriate Level 1 Speaking, listening and communication topic could relate to the emergence of internet-based shopping and its implications. Example topic: "Is internet shopping good for everyone? What are the advantages and/or disadvantages of our shopping increasingly being done without having to leave the home or workplace? Discuss" This topic will be reasonably familiar and straightforward for learners operating at this level and learners are likely to have clear views about its effects and value. While this type of topic may be used for the more informal discussion, and not require formal preparation, it might be helpful for learners to be given a moment at the outset to consider the topic prior to commencing the assessment. This type of topic has considerable potential for exploration within an active conversation and the discussion format and range of views aired, provide opportunities for learners to consider, reflect upon, and develop their ideas and opinions as part of the assessed activity. A learner may, for example, start only by considering only their personal experience and the benefits to themselves, however, they should be ready to exchange ideas and to respond effectively to a range of views, engaging with the topic and their peers in a way that allows them to consider its effects - whether positive or negative - on different types of people and on society more broadly. An active discussion about the topic should allow them to think beyond their


personal perspective and experience, and to consider whether it might have broader implications for contemporary life, whether this be, for example, for the future of our high streets, for shopkeepers, for employment, for community life, for cities and how they are designed and constructed, for social interaction, and for helping the less able, the elderly, or those in remote areas etc. While the topic has rich potential, at Level 1 learners can engage with the topic in a straightforward and familiar manner, talking to one another about current, or potential, benefits and disadvantages, and how they apply to different people and in different circumstances. This approach will still afford good, level-appropriate opportunities to demonstrate the full range of skills specified for assessment. Appropriate level As the Speaking, Listening and Communication (SLC) assessment is output-based, usually being either a formal or informal discussion based upon a set topic, it is possible to present certain topics at either Level 1 or Level 2, so long as they provide learners with reasonable opportunities to demonstrate the respective skills at each level. At Level 1, the topic should be relatively straightforward while at Level 2 it is important that it is complex. However, the topic may be able to be introduced in a straightforward manner at Level 1 and support the more complex discussion of information, ideas and opinions at Level 2. The following topic, included at Level 2, is a good example of one which could be used at Level 1, as learners can engage effectively with the topic in a reasonably straightforward manner, and can consider those aspects of social media with which they are familiar. Example topic: "Social media use at work (or insert the relevant education-based context) is a big problem. We have decided to restrict access to all social media on work-based computers and to ban its use on personal devices in the workplace. We are also consider developing clear guidelines about their use, as an alternative, which we would introduce on a trial basis from next month" While it is important that any topics chosen are suitable to the level, it is also essential to use the templates provided for the relevant level, to ensure that the assessment activities are appropriate and are administered consistently, and to ensure that the assessment activities and performance evidence are directly measured against the level specific criteria.


Level 2 Speaking, Listening and Communication Assessment instructions Assessors must assess individual performance (albeit in a group context and in relation to the input, contributions and behaviour of others) against the full set of criteria to determine whether they are proficient at the level. The assessors’ judgements as to whether a learner has achieved/not achieved the component must be recorded in the online XAMS system against the learner’s record. The Record of Learner Achievement templates provided in this document reflect the information that must be provided. These forms support centres in recording judgements prior to internal quality assurance and entering final results into XAMS. Making and recording assessment judgements 1. Assessors are required to verify a learner’s identity, and authenticate that the work

presented for assessment is the learner’s own. 2. Assessors must complete individual performance, criterion-based judgements for each

learner in all activities. This is completed on the Record of Learner Achievement Form (Template B).

3. For the first six cohorts or a minimum of 10 learners*, all assessment session should either be audio or video recorded as well as the assessor completing the Record of Learner Achievement.

4. Assessors evaluating an individual must judge whether a learner consistently meets the performance threshold (i.e. Achieved Level 1) while allowing for the variability and unpredictability inherent in group discussions.

5. The assessment must produce a pass/achieve or fail/not achieve outcome. Assessors must make careful judgements about whether the learner's performance meets the criteria. Only learners who have had a "Yes" (or Y) against all of the "AC Achieved" statements in all activities associated with the level the learner is undertaking, will be awarded a Pass.

6. Once all assessment evidence has been captured on the Record of Learner Achievement Form, Assessors must sign and date the form. By signing the Record of Learner Achievement Form, the Assessor is confirming that the assessment has been conducted according the FutureQuals required controlled conditions.

7. Centres must scan all hard copies of the Record of Learner Achievement Form and these should be stored securely within the centre for a period of three years.

8. Centres must submit all Record of Learner Achievement Forms to FutureQuals via a secure method (i.e. upload these into the centre’s Huddle folder).

9. Assessors must enter the learner’s final assessment outcome (Achieved/Not Achieved) into the required field against the learner’s individual record in XAMS.

10. All learners scheduled and being presented for assessment in the same cohort will appear in the same XAMS screen.



Level 2 - Two separate discussions within different contexts (Activity 1 and 2) Two formal discussions Guidance for assessors 10–15 minutes in duration for each activity Conditions Topics

The duration of the formal discussions may vary slightly but should be as far as possible consistent for learners being assessed at the same level. At least one of the formal discussions should be a minimum of 15 minutes in duration, allowing adequate time for the topic to be covered and the assessment criteria to be demonstrated. The second assessment may be shorter. The discussions and exchanges must allow for the consistent assessment of the skills defined in the regulatory criteria, irrespective of when the assessment takes place. The nature of discussions means that unpredictable elements may be present but it is important that centres ensure that the assessment tasks and conditions provide fair and equivalent opportunities for all learners to demonstrate their level of proficiency against the skill standards. One of the formal discussions will be based upon an agreed topic which learners should have prepared for while the second discussion should be based upon a topic for which learners have not been able to prepare, although it may be relevant to the programme or context. While the duration of discussions may vary slightly, it is important that this type of variation is limited and doesn't present different opportunities to demonstrate the standard across assessments. Centres can agree suitable topics for the formal discussions but they must provide appropriate opportunities for learners to demonstrate each of the skills at the level. One of the topics must be agreed in advance to allow for preparation while the other must be introduced at the time of the assessment to allow for a discussion topic that has not been prepared for or rehearsed in any way. The topics should ideally be related to the learning programme and present opportunities for applying the skills in purposeful and 'real-life' contexts, being based upon a vocationally relevant subject or issue, for example. Agreed topics must be substantive and engaging, and include complex subject matter at Level 2. They must allow for


Preparation Evidence

meaningful preparation, and for learners to make relevant, various, significant, and where appropriate, persuasive contributions to formal discussions, in which a range of roles or approaches will be necessary to advance the discussion and/or to reach conclusions. One of the discussions must introduce unfamiliar aspects to the learner, whether in terms of context, discussion format or type, and/or subject matter. This must be based upon the learner's previous experience and might take the form of an interview or chaired meeting, for example. The two discussions must not be the same, presenting distinct challenges within which learners are expected to demonstrate the relevant skills. Learners should be allowed to prepare for, at least, one of the formal discussions, with prior notice of the discussion topic. Learners should anticipate spending at least 2 hours on preparation for the topic, to allow sufficient time for researching and reading relevant information or sources and producing preparatory notes (or a plan) about the main points which they wish to communicate, for example, and draw upon to demonstrate knowledge and understanding, and specific facts, dates, ideas, evidence or references which they may wish or need to use to support their views and respond effectively in the discussion. Learners may use prompts from this preparation but external support should be restricted to preparation stages. Outcomes for individual learner performance must be completed in the XAMS system in order for the component to be awarded. Use of the Record of Learner Achievement Form is mandatory during assessment delivery and internal quality assurance. All assessment evidence should be logged on Record of Learner Achievement Form for each learner undertaking the assessment. For the first six cohorts or a minimum of 10 learners*, all Record of Learner Achievement Forms and either audio or video recordings of the assessment session and the IQA’s report must be uploaded to the centre’s secure SharePoint site and will be moderated by FutureQuals.



Thereafter, a minimum of 10% of assessments will be moderated, however, this percentage is determined and reviewed by FutureQuals. Following the internal centre assessment and the FutureQuals moderation of six cohorts (with a minimum of at least ten learners in total), and confirmation from FutureQuals, all assessments should continue to be recorded (audio or video). These recordings will however not need to be uploaded to SharePoint but must be retained, along with all IQA sampling records, by the approved centre for at least three years from the assessment date. All Record of Learner Achievement Forms must be uploaded for every learner.

Although there is no requirement to submit these recordings to FutureQuals as part of the moderation process, access to these records may be requested at any time during unannounced visits and/or quality reviews. Centres are responsible for checking that all assessment session recordings are fit-for-purpose. If a centre identifies that a recording of an assessment session has failed, then it must notify FutureQuals immediately. Centres have a maximum of 30 days to upload assessment results to XAMS from the date the learner undertakes the assessment.


Level 2 Activity One – Formal discussion Guidance for Assessors using individual performance criterion-based judgements This guidance can be used when assessing if candidates achieve or do not achieve Level 2 standards. Below Level 2 Y/N Achieved Level 2 Y/N Presents information and ideas to others, but is sometimes unclear, insufficiently detailed, or unpersuasive

Presents information and ideas clearly, and where appropriately, persuasively to others

Inconsistently makes contributions that are relevant to discussions Limited evidence of preparation for the formal discussion of ideas and opinions

Gives relevant, cogent responses to complex information in appropriate language

Information and points of view not presented adequately or clearly, particularly in contexts which appear less familiar

Makes significant contributions to discussions and exchanges, including in contexts which are unfamiliar

Limited variation in kinds of contributions made to discussions Limited use of appropriate language and expression

Adapts contributions to suit audience, purpose and situation, including for contexts which are unfamiliar

Takes only limited roles in discussions and exchanges Sometimes allows for and responds effectively to others' input but not consistently

Demonstrates a range of roles, in accordance with situation and context, and helps contexts to advance


Guidance for Activity One – Level 2 Example topic: "Having a 24-hour, 7 day a week National Health Service would be a significant improvement. In fact, it is essential in 21st century Britain, and its immediate implementation should be supported by everyone interested in the nation's health" This type of topic may be suitable for the formal discussion, where the learners are required to prepare for the discussion, because it is topical, contentious, substantive and complex. It requires learners to engage with an issue which is likely to be relatively unfamiliar, in terms of the specific details, and to do so beyond just their initial reactions, and potentially beyond media headlines or the straightforward rehearsal of established positions from public figures. An "issues-based topic" is often useful for the discussion which requires preparation to ensure that learners are genuinely considering complex subject matter and related information, and not just providing their immediate reactions, or only superficially considered responses. At Level 2, learners must be able to consider complex information in order to contribute effectively to this type of discussion, which is authentic and multi-dimensional. The fact that it is mildly controversial means that it is a topic which will demand carefully considered and reasonably sophisticated speaking, listening and communication skills; learners cannot rely too heavily on their speaking skills alone. Listening, body language, nuance, evidence and sensitivity are all part of the potential repertoire. Importantly, this type of topic also presents an appropriate degree of challenge and unfamiliarity at Level 2, and so will be able to exercise the full range of the skills requirements, including those which require effective inter-personal interaction, appropriateness of language and conduct, and a combination of skills, ranging from persuasive techniques, the recall of facts, figures or other relevant information to support points of view, and the requirement to consider and respond effectively to different perspectives and arguments put forward, whether by figures of authority from the wider community, or those of their colleagues and peers. Preparation: This topic requires preparation, research and planning in order to understand the range and complexity of the different arguments and opinions, the possible implications of the proposal, and some of the more informed positions or objectives of different parties involved in the debate. It also highlights the value and potential difficulty of discussing public policy type issues in an appropriate manner, and of being able to adapt contributions in accordance with audience, purpose and situation, and crucially, in response to the approaches of the other participants. This type of topic allows learners to consider an issue of complexity, to investigate divergent views, to draw upon a range of sources of information and evidence, and to attempt to distil and present this information in the context of a formal work or education-based discussion. This requires a


different skill set to more familiar informal discussion of issues about which learners might have strong opinions, or less considered dialogue and argument in casual situations. Consider the following simple check-list as the basis for preparation: • Research the issue. • Consider the implications. • Consider positives and negatives. • Decide on your own point view. • Consider why you believe what you do and how you would communicate and defend your

position. • Consider counter-arguments and how you may respond to them. • Consider whether you could be convinced of the opposing position. • Make effective notes about the issue, and include information, facts and perspectives that

you think are relevant and authoritative, and which will be useful in the discussion. While proposals such as the one outlined for this topic can sound like self-evident improvements, at least initially, learners must be able to consider the complexities of the topic, and to use preparation time to research the attendant issues, possible risks or obstacles, and even the necessary conditions for the success of such a proposal, such as the need for greater investment or resources to support this type of initiative, for example. Learners should be encouraged to examine the various sides to these arguments, to consider how they are presented, to consider bias, and to think critically, in order to be able to present a balanced or reasoned outline of the issue. They should be able to appreciate that while these types of issues may be associated with party political programmes, they remain relevant as broader public policy issues, and as such, can be considered, discussed, and debated by the general public in a dispassionate (or passionate) manner, in order to better understand the subject or proposal, its implications, and potential benefits or viability. Issues-based topics provide an opportunity for learners to investigate different perspectives and to formulate their own opinions, while drawing upon research, facts, evidence and opinions that are relevant to the topic, and to adapt these to the diversity of views expressed by their peers and colleagues. A key aspect of "complexity" and "unfamiliarity" at Level 2 can often be an understanding that issues in the media or politics may be simplified, sensationalised, biased, reduced to unhelpful "sound bites", and even susceptible to manipulation. This will allow them to appreciate the value of becoming better informed about these types of subjects and issues, and discussing them more effectively with others. Appropriateness of topics: Appropriate topics, of course, do not need to be issues-based, controversial or the subject of contemporary public discussion to allow for the appropriate assessment of the relevant skills at Level 2. The topic above is just one example and centres may feel it is more appropriate to discuss a more practical, work-related or vocational topic (see later examples).


However, it is important that the agreed topic has complexity, is likely to elicit a range of views or opinions, will benefit from preparation (and possibly evidence or references to external material), and will require learners to engage meaningfully with a variety of points, arguments and opinions, in order to demonstrate the full set of skill standards at the level. Roles: Taking different roles is a Level 2 requirement. This type of topic would allow learners to consider different positions, in terms of those who might be affected by the outcome of these policy debates and decisions, and be able to outline and represent these different views, effectively taking on different roles when communicating different perspectives. They might demonstrate their ability to consider the different types of people who could be affected, to empathise with the different positions, and to respond effectively to alternative viewpoints. "A range of roles" in the context of the assessment activity also more directly relates to the roles taken within the course of the actual discussion, in terms of an individual learners approach, behaviour, and engagement with both the topic and the other participants. A learner may, for example, take the lead or initiative in outlining some of the key points (one role), represent a counter-argument that has not been aired (possibly "playing devil's advocate", as a different role), mediate where positions are becoming intractable, summarise points of view, demonstrate empathy or show understanding for others, seek clarification for specific points which are not clear, or conclude and propose next steps, ways forward or a means of recording the nature of the discussion. For a Level 2 pass, learners are likely to only have the opportunity to show a limited range of these roles within each assessment activity, but they must demonstrate their versatility in discussions, and to be able to adapt their contributions accord to the conditions. Structure: The facilitator/assessor should confirm the topic at the outset. They should also confirm that all of the learners have been informed in advance of the topic (for the preparation-based formal discussion) and that they have had the opportunity to prepare for the discussion. The assessor should also remind the learners that they will be individually assessed against the full set of performance standards at the level. In certain circumstances, and by exception, the facilitator/assessor may feel the need to introduce a counter-argument or different perspective as a limited intervention in the discussion at a specific point, to ensure that the conversation has sufficient depth and complexity, and includes a range of different viewpoints, in order to provide adequate opportunities for learners to demonstrate the relevant skills. For example: "Have you considered how this would be resourced in the context of health budgets already under strain (e.g. having highly trained doctors, medical personnel, and other staff available day and night, seven days a week, rather than five)?"


"Have you considered whether this may introduce risks in terms of quality, resourcing, and the expertise of those available at all hours, every day?. Are there enough doctors and medical staff available across the country (e.g. cities, towns, country areas)? Could it add pressures to the health system which might pose risks to medical practice and patients?" This would allow the learners who have until this point been largely in agreement and/or primarily considered only one side of the proposal adequate opportunities to: • consider appropriately complex information • give relevant cogent responses in appropriate language • present information and ideas clearly and persuasively to others • adapt contributions to suit audience, purpose and situation • make significant contributions to discussions, • take a range of roles • and help move discussion forward. • Consider contexts that are unfamiliar as well as complex Interventions of this type should be kept to a minimum, and only take place where it will facilitate necessary performance ranges for learners where a discussion is too narrow or limited, mainly due to very similar or convergent views, and/or lack of awareness of the complexities and dimensions of the topic put forward. The assessor is not expected to support the discussion, to assist the participants generally, or provide other advice or guidance during the assessment activity. An alternative topic that should be able to meet these requirements, and crucially, provide reasonable opportunities for learners to demonstrate the full range of skills, could be: Example topic: "Social media use at work (or insert the relevant education-based context) is a big problem. We have decided to restrict access to all social media on work-based computers and to ban its use on personal devices in the workplace. We are also considering the development of clear guidelines about their use, as an alternative, which we would introduce on a trial basis from next month" Discuss this decision (and the options). Learners would be expected to discuss the current situation, how or whether it is a problem, the implications of a ban, their views, other opinions or perspectives, the advantages and disadvantages of the two options, what the guidelines might include, any conclusions and next steps from the group. These different aspects of the topic should not require prompts as part of the assessment activity. Learners should understand that it is their responsibility to engage with the topic fully, to understand that they are being assessed individually throughout the discussion, and to be aware of the assessment criteria.


Assessing learner performance The assessor must consider the performance threshold at which Level 2 performance is defined, and the nature of performance below this level, and carefully monitor each learner's performance throughout the assessment activity in relation to these defined standards. While assessors are ultimately required to make evidence-based, professional judgements on a "best fit" basis due to the variability inherent in group discussions, they must be in a position to confirm whether or not a learner consistently demonstrates a specific skill standard over the course of the discussion. This means that a learner will repeatedly and consistently demonstrate the performance requirement "at Level 2" during the activity, despite the fact that, for example, one of their points may have been interrupted by another participant, they may not have had a chance to respond to a particular aspect of the conversation, or they may not have persuaded some participants of their fundamental position. Assessors are looking for positive examples of the level requirements to be demonstrated despite the changing conditions, and should note whether the learner is proficient against each specific skill standard at the level, or falls below this performance expectation, throughout the discussion. The assessor should note several representative examples of performance which support their decisions, and while these types of conversations can be fast paced, it is important that the assessor can note, for example, whether the learner is: • "Considering complex information" and "giving relevant cogent responses in appropriate

language". • "Presenting information and ideas clearly" and "persuasively". • Able to "adapt their contributions" as the conversation changes, as different views are

expressed, as delivery, behaviour and levels of emotion change during the discussion, or a new perspective or fact is introduced, requiring possible reflection, review and reformulation on the part of the learner.

• Making "significant contributions" at times, able "to take a range of roles", such as an authority on an aspect of the discussion, a mediator where the conversation becomes fractious, highly subjective, or party political, for example, and as a reasonably neutral figure seeking resolution or to summarise the arguments and agree the next steps, therefore "helping to move discussion forward".

Wherever possible, the assessor should make a brief note on the Record of Learner Achievement Form of how each one - or most of them - are demonstrated, as evidence. This will allow assessors to be confident about their final judgements, when they are required to state "yes or no" as a final decision against each criteria, and to confirm whether the learner's achievement against each statement is secure (i.e. Yes), or inconsistent and more closely aligned to the "not achieved" criteria (i.e. No). This is also important for the purposes of standardisation and quality assurance (both internal and external) so that consistent standards are being applied for all assessments at a specific level, irrespective of the assessment occasion, assessor, or location of the assessment.


Ideally, centres will be able to provide further evidence for standardisation and quality assurance through audio-visual evidence, and where this is not possible, centres are responsible for ensuring consistent and comparable assessment, and will be subject to external quality assurance checks, both through scheduled visits and assessment observations, and unannounced "spot checks" to confirm that assessment procedures, judgements about performance, and supporting evidence support these secure standards in the assessment of the "Speaking, listening and communication" component.


Level 2 Activity Two – Second discussion Guidance for Assessors using individual performance criterion-based judgements This guidance can be used when assessing if candidates achieve or do not achieve Level 2 standards.

Below Level 2 Y/N Achieved Level 2 Y/N

Presents information and ideas to others, but is sometimes unclear, insufficiently detailed, or unpersuasive

Presents information and ideas clearly, and where appropriately, persuasively to others

Inconsistently makes contributions that are relevant to discussions Limited evidence of preparation for the formal discussion of ideas and opinions

Gives relevant, cogent responses to complex information in appropriate language

Information and points of view not presented adequately or clearly, particularly in contexts which appear less familiar

Makes significant contributions to discussions and exchanges, including in contexts which are unfamiliar

Limited variation in kinds of contributions made to discussions Limited use of appropriate language and expression

Adapts contributions to suit audience, purpose and situation, including for contexts which are unfamiliar

Takes only limited roles in discussions and exchanges Sometimes allows for and responds effectively to others' input but not consistently

Demonstrates a range of roles, in accordance with situation and context, and helps contexts to advance


Guidance on Activity Two: Level 2 The second discussion may be more familiar and directly relevant to the learner's context, such as a workplace initiative, where learners understand the context well and can discuss the suggestion in an impromptu manner, when it is introduced at the beginning of the assessment activity. Example topic:

"Management intends to introduce an initiative known as "condensed fortnights". This is a trial scheme where employees are able to work an extra hour each day in order to take every second Friday or Monday off during the summer months."

This discussion topic allows learners to formulate opinions, to consider the implications or consequences of the proposal for their workplace. They are able to consider the positives and potential negatives for the different parties, whether for the company, for management, for employees, for customers, or for any other stakeholders who might be affected by the policy, within the context of a discussion which they have not been able to prepare for.


Activity 3 - Effective presentations at Level 2 Formal presentations Guidance for assessors Context (including audience)

Topic

Preparation

Evidence

The presentation should be between 5–10 minutes in duration. The learners will be assessed on making effective formal presentations to an audience (comprising a minimum of four people). The presentation can be based upon a topic of the learner's choice but must be agreed upon in advance with the practitioner/tutor, or assessor. The topic could be related to the learning programme, although this isn't obligatory. However, it must allow for the consideration, and delivery, of complex information, which is appropriate to the level and context. Further information on suitable topics is available in the guidance section.

The presentation should be based upon preparation on the part of the learner in relation to their agreed topic. The content of the presentation should be sufficiently complex and substantive to require clear preparation, and to need to be, for example, informed by research or the collection of relevant information, evidence, data, or similar, supporting details. Learners should anticipate spending at least 1-2 hours preparing for their presentation, including finding relevant information, planning and preparing relevant information and details in an appropriate format to support its delivery, and to be able to field questions. Information on cohort and learner performance must be submitted to the XAMS system in order for the component to be awarded.

For the first six cohorts, or a minimum of 10 learners*, all learners should be either audio or video recorded and uploaded to the centre’s SharePoint folder, along with the completed Record of Learner Achievement Forms and the IQA report within 3 working days of the date of the internal quality assurance panel for external quality assurance.

Thereafter, a minimum of 10% of assessments will be moderated, however, this percentage is determined and


reviewed by FutureQuals. Following the internal centre assessment and the FutureQuals moderation of six cohorts (with a minimum of at least ten learners in total), and confirmation from FutureQuals, all assessments should continue to be recorded (audio or video). These recordings will however not need to be uploaded to SharePoint but must be retained, along with all IQA sampling records, by the approved centre for at least three years from the assessment date. All Record of Learner Achievement Forms must be uploaded for every learner.

Although there is no requirement to submit these recordings to FutureQuals as part of the moderation process, access to these records may be requested at any time during unannounced visits and/or quality reviews. Centres are responsible for checking that all assessment session recordings are fit-for-purpose. If a centre identifies that a recording of an assessment session has failed, then it must notify FutureQuals immediately.

Centres have a maximum of 30 days to upload assessment results to XAMS from the date the learner undertakes the assessment.



Level 2 Activity Three - Formal presentation Guidance for Assessors using individual performance criterion-based judgements This guidance can be used when assessing if candidates achieve or do not achieve Level 2 standards. Below Level 2 Y/N Achieved Level 2 Y/N Presents information on the topic, but this lacks detail and clarity at times, and there are weaknesses in language use.

Delivers effective presentations, with appropriate detail and language, based upon complex information.

Information, ideas and opinions presented lack clarity, detail and/or cogency

Presents information, ideas and opinions clearly and convincingly, or where appropriate, persuasively to others

Engagement of audience is limited, inconsistent or unsustained, lacking necessary adaptation to suit purpose and context

Engages audience interest, adapting contributions to suit purpose and context.


Guidance on Activity Three: Level 2

A learner may decide to make a presentation on a recent workplace or education-based experience, challenge and/or achievement. It should be based upon complex information, which the learner demonstrates they can communicate clearly and appropriately to their audience. This will require them to include adequate detail and appropriate language, to present information convincingly, authoritatively, and persuasively, where appropriate, and to engage their audience by adapting their contributions, engaging suitable techniques and registers, and responding effectively to context, purpose and audience. Presentation topics could include a wide range of subjects. An example might be a work-based project, for example. Example topic: A new scheme to encourage employees to become more engaged in, or take greater responsibility for, their own continuous professional development (CPD), whether this is within the company, their department or their team. The presentation could: • Highlighting the CPD options available • Explain the benefits to individuals/employees, and the employer • Include case studies or examples of how different education and training programmes have

benefited other individuals • Explain how the programme is being implemented Each of these areas can be presented in whatever manner the learner believes will be the most effective, and specific areas expanded upon, depending on the amount of information or details available and the level of audience interest. While this is a hypothetical example, there will be countless similar examples within a work or education-based context which learners can choose from, and which will be both relevant and meaningful to learners on Functional Skills programmes.


Template A

LEVEL 1 FUNCTIONAL SKILLS QUALIFICATION IN ENGLISH: SPEAKING, LISTENING AND COMMUNICATION RECORD OF LEARNER ACHIEVEMENT

Learner name:

Date of birth: Learner number:

Location:

Assessor name:

Assessment task:

Additional assessment requirements:

Additional comments / incidents:

Result (please insert a ‘Y’ or tick as appropriate)

Achieved Not Achieved

I declare that the record presented for this assessment is entirely my own work.

Learner signature:

Date:

I confirm that:

1. the learner’s identity has been checked. 2. the assessment was conducted under controlled conditions. 3. the learner has been assessed against the required assessment criteria. Assessor signature:

Date:

Internal Quality Assurer signature: (if sampled)

Date:

This Record of Learner Achievement must be submitted to FutureQuals via a secure method prior to confirming the learner’s achievement through the online XAMS platform. This form must be completed and the original retained by the centre in a secure place. The original must be made available to FutureQuals or your external quality assurer/moderator upon request.


LEVEL 1 FUNCTIONAL SKILLS QUALIFICATION IN ENGLISH: SPEAKING, LISTENING AND COMMUNICATION ASSESSMENT SHEET – DISCUSSION 1 Skill standard The learner can: AC Achieved?

SS1 Make relevant and extended contributions to discussions, allowing for and responding to others’ input.

SS2 Prepare for and contribute to the formal discussion of ideas and opinions.

SS3 Make different kinds of contributions to discussions.

SS4 Present information/points of view clearly and in appropriate language.

Skill standard Record of discussion

This could include: records of questions asked, responses, observations or interactions

SS1 For example, does the learner make effective, relevant and extended contributions to the discussion, allowing for and responding to others’ input?

SS2 For example, does the learner contribute effectively to the discussion with ideas and opinions?

SS3 For example, does the learner make effective and varied contributions to the discussion?

SS4 For example, does the learner present information and points of view clearly to an audience and in suitable language?

Additional assessor evidence/comments:



SS1 Make relevant and extended contributions to discussions, allowing for and responding to others’ input.

SS2 Prepare for and contribute to the formal discussion of ideas and opinions.

SS3 Make different kinds of contributions to discussions.

SS4 Present information/points of view clearly and in appropriate language.



SS1 For example, does the learner make effective, relevant and extended contributions to the discussion, allowing for and responding to others’ input?

SS2 For example, does the learner contribute effectively to the discussion with ideas and opinions?

SS3 For example, does the learner make effective and varied contributions to the discussion?

SS4 For example, does the learner present information and points of view clearly to an audience and in suitable language?



Template B

LEVEL 2 FUNCTIONAL SKILLS QUALIFICATION IN ENGLISH: SPEAKING, LISTENING AND COMMUNICATION RECORD OF LEARNER ACHIEVEMENT

Learner name:

Date of birth: Learner number:

Location:

Assessor name:

Assessment task:

Additional assessment requirements:

Additional comments / incidents:

Result (please insert a ‘Y’ or tick as appropriate)

Achieved Not Achieved

I declare that the record presented for this assessment is entirely my own work. Learner signature:

Date:

I confirm that:

1. the learner’s identity has been checked. 2. the assessment was conducted under controlled conditions. 3. the learner has been assessed against the required assessment criteria. Assessor signature:

Date:

Internal Quality Assurer signature: (if sampled)

Date:

This Record of Learner Achievement must be submitted to FutureQuals via a secure method prior to confirming the learner’s achievement through the online XAMS platform.

This form must be completed and the original retained by the centre in a secure place. The original must be made available to FutureQuals or your external quality assurer/moderator upon request.



SS1 Consider complex information and give a relevant, cogent response in appropriate language.

SS3 Adapt contributions to suit audience, purpose and situation.

SS4 Make significant contributions to discussions, taking a range of roles and helping to move discussion forward.



SS1 For example, does the learner give relevant, cogent responses to complex information in appropriate language?

SS3 For example, does the learner adapt their contributions to discussions to suit audience, purpose and situation? Does the learner demonstrate a range of roles in accordance with the situation?

SS4 For example, does the learner make significant contributions to discussions?




SS1 Consider complex information and give a relevant, cogent response in appropriate language.


SS4 Make significant contributions to discussions, taking a range of roles and helping to move discussion forward.



SS1 For example, does the learner give relevant, cogent responses to complex information in appropriate language?


SS4 For example, does the learner make significant contributions to discussions?



LEVEL 2 FUNCTIONAL SKILLS QUALIFICATION IN ENGLISH: SPEAKING, LISTENING AND COMMUNICATION ASSESSMENT SHEET – INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION Skill standard The learner can: AC Achieved?

SS2 Present information and ideas clearly and persuasively to others.



This could include, records of questions asked, responses, observations or interactions

SS2 For example, does the learner present information and ideas clearly and persuasively?




Appendix 1: Functional Skills Report on Observation of Internal Assessment – English Speaking, Listening and Communication Instructions for Centres Centres must ensure that an internal quality assurer/observer carries out formal observation, including a written report of performance for a minimum of 10% of the cohort for Functional Skills English Speaking, Listening and Communication at all levels. This is to ensure that the assessments, which require very limited learner recording of responses, are being conducted appropriately. A minimum 10% of the cohort must be observed proportionately across the relevant levels. When more than one tutor conducts the assessments, the observation of assessments should be spread proportionately across all tutors. A separate copy of this Report on Observation of Internal Assessment should be completed by the observer for each tutor carrying out assessment The form should be scanned and uploaded to FutureQuals’ secure site along with all completed Record of Learner Achievement Forms and audio or video recordings.


Name of Centre

Level Level 1 Level 2

Date(s) of Assessment

Name of Tutor/Assessor

Name of Observer

Learners Observed Name FutureQuals Learner Number

Were assessments conducted in accordance with the FutureQuals Functional Skills guidance?

Yes No

(if no, please detail recommendations to address in the action plan section)

Do you agree with the assessor’s decisions? Give details of any adjustments applied to the assessor’s assessment of the performance of the learners as an outcome of this observation process (with reference to specific learners)

Yes No

(if no, please detail recommendations to address in the action plan section)

Action Plan

Observer’s signature and date Signature Date

Tutor/Assessor’s signature and date

Signature Date


Appendix 2: Functional Skills English Speaking, Listening and Communication Internal Quality Assurance Tracking Form

English Component

Level (Tick appropriate)

Level 1

Level 2

Cohort/Assessment Title/Topic

Formal Discussion Informal Discussion Presentation Planned Unplanned

Assessor IQA

Learner Name Sample

(Tick Appropriate)

Assessment Title/Component Title

Agree/Not Agree with Decision (Tick Appropriate)

Comments

Yes Agree No Not Agree








Internal Quality Assurer (Name)

Internal Quality Assurer (Signature)

Date

Assessor (Name)

Assessor (Signature)

Date


Appendix 3: Functional Skills Internal Quality Assurance Feedback to Assessor Form

English Component

Level (Tick appropriate)

Level 1

Level 2

Cohort/Assessment Title/Topic

Formal Discussion Informal Discussion Presentation Planned Unplanned

Learners sampled: General Feedback to Assessor: Good Practice Identified: Action Plan Internal Quality Assurer (Name)

Internal Quality Assurer (Signature)

Date

Assessor (Name)

Assessor (Signature)

Date


Appendix 4: Speaking, Listening and Communication Assessment Internal Quality Assurance Panel Form Date of meeting

Location of meeting

Cohorts covered by the panel

No Agenda Notes Actions 1. Present:

(As a minimum all assessors and Internal Quality Assurer)

2. Apologies:

3. Matters arising from previous panel: (where applicable)

4. Review and confirmation of results: The panel should consider:

a) Have the mark schemes and standards been consistently applied?


b) Results in comparison to predicted learner performance

c) Observation reports d) Application of

standard in comparison with previous cohorts (where applicable)

Decisions must be made in accordance with the Speaking, Listening and Communication Assessment specification.

5. Any other business:

Present (add addition rows if required)

Name Signature Date (Internal Quality Assurer)

www.futurequals.com

Future (Awards and Qualifications) LtdEMP House, Telford Way, Coalville,Leicestershire, LE67 3HE

Telephone: 01530 836662Fax: 01530 836668Email: [email protected]: www.futurequals.com

Future QualsINSPIRING LEARNING AND SKILLS

TM

Documents

INSPIRING LEARNING AND SKILLS - FutureQuals · INSPIRING LEARNING AND SKILLS. TM. English Speaking, Listening and Communication Guidance Version 3 - March 2019. English Speaking,