17
IMS Learning Object Discovery & Exchange David Massart, IMS LODE co-chair EdReNe Expert Workshop 4.1 January 8, 2008 - London, UK

IMS Learning Object Discovery & Exchange David Massart, IMS LODE co-chair EdReNe Expert Workshop 4.1 January 8, 2008 - London, UK David Massart, IMS LODE

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

IMS Learning ObjectDiscovery & ExchangeIMS Learning ObjectDiscovery & Exchange

David Massart, IMS LODE co-chair

EdReNe Expert Workshop 4.1

January 8, 2008 - London, UK

David Massart, IMS LODE co-chair

EdReNe Expert Workshop 4.1

January 8, 2008 - London, UK

OutlineOutline

Motivation Objectives LODE versus other IMS specs Expected benefits Technical overview Deliverables Agenda

Motivation Objectives LODE versus other IMS specs Expected benefits Technical overview Deliverables Agenda

TodayToday

The use of learning (content) management systems is common in most educational organizations

Huge number of educational resources available on-line, for free or by subscription

Most of these resources are hidden in repositories, which hampers their potential use and reuse

Several initiatives aim at federating e-learning systems to unlock the educational content hidden in their repositories The EUN Learning Resource Exchange GLOBE CORDRA

The use of learning (content) management systems is common in most educational organizations

Huge number of educational resources available on-line, for free or by subscription

Most of these resources are hidden in repositories, which hampers their potential use and reuse

Several initiatives aim at federating e-learning systems to unlock the educational content hidden in their repositories The EUN Learning Resource Exchange GLOBE CORDRA

BUT ...BUT ...

No agreed profiles address the needs of the learning domain

No established practices for combining existing specifications into complete solutions

Individual organizations (GLOBE, LRE, CORDRA) are creating their own solutions, and an opportunity to establish broader interoperability is being missed

There is no way of measuring or testing the compatibility and conformance of specific solutions

No agreed profiles address the needs of the learning domain

No established practices for combining existing specifications into complete solutions

Individual organizations (GLOBE, LRE, CORDRA) are creating their own solutions, and an opportunity to establish broader interoperability is being missed

There is no way of measuring or testing the compatibility and conformance of specific solutions

IMS LODE Project GroupIMS LODE Project Group

Aims to facilitate the discovery and retrieval of learning content stored in repositories

Examines, selects, and adapts specifications that are being applied to digital libraries, generic repositories, and learning repositories

Defines a small number of scenarios for the discovery and exchange of learning resources (e.g., federated searching, harvesting, etc.)

Will produce: A set of specification profiles to support the scenarios Sample implementation(s) A conformance domain-profile

Aims to facilitate the discovery and retrieval of learning content stored in repositories

Examines, selects, and adapts specifications that are being applied to digital libraries, generic repositories, and learning repositories

Defines a small number of scenarios for the discovery and exchange of learning resources (e.g., federated searching, harvesting, etc.)

Will produce: A set of specification profiles to support the scenarios Sample implementation(s) A conformance domain-profile

LODE versus Other IMS SpecsLODE versus Other IMS Specs

Current IMS specs Make it easier to exchange and reuse learning

content (e.g., QTI, Common Cartridge, Content Packaging)

Allow specific types of content to be transferred between systems and reused

Aide discovery by unifying the descriptions of content (e.g., Metadata, VDEX)

Do not address the issue of how this content can be found

Missing piece: A protocol to support the discovery and exchange of interoperable content

Current IMS specs Make it easier to exchange and reuse learning

content (e.g., QTI, Common Cartridge, Content Packaging)

Allow specific types of content to be transferred between systems and reused

Aide discovery by unifying the descriptions of content (e.g., Metadata, VDEX)

Do not address the issue of how this content can be found

Missing piece: A protocol to support the discovery and exchange of interoperable content

Expected BenefitsExpected Benefits

Educators Easy way to discover learning content that

addresses students’ needs Maximization of re-use Minimization of material re-invention costs

Students Access to the highest-quality learning

resources available Significant impact on the quality of learning

experience and learning outcomes

Educators Easy way to discover learning content that

addresses students’ needs Maximization of re-use Minimization of material re-invention costs

Students Access to the highest-quality learning

resources available Significant impact on the quality of learning

experience and learning outcomes

Expected Benefits (2)Expected Benefits (2)

Content providers Ability to advertise products by making them

globally discoverable System vendors

Limited set of specifications to support to make systems compliant with major federations of learning resources

Federation builders Secure investment by developing

infrastructures based on standard specifications

Content providers Ability to advertise products by making them

globally discoverable System vendors

Limited set of specifications to support to make systems compliant with major federations of learning resources

Federation builders Secure investment by developing

infrastructures based on standard specifications

Searching A RepositorySearching A Repository

Repository

Query

Result

query

result

Harvesting A RepositoryHarvesting A Repository

Repository

Request

ResponseRepository

Registering A RepositoryRegistering A Repository

RegisterRepository Registry

RepositoryDescription

Looking For A RepositoryLooking For A Repository

Query

RegistryResult

Putting Everything TogetherPutting Everything Together

Reg#1

Reg#2

Rep#4

Rep#1

Rep#2

Rep#3

Rep#6

Rep#5

DeliverablesDeliverables

IMS GLC LODE v1.0 Overview IMS GLC LODE v1.0 Information Model IMS GLC LODE v1.0 Binding IMS GLC LODE v1.0 Best Practice &

Implementation Guide IMS GLC LODE v1.0 Conformance

Specification

IMS GLC LODE v1.0 Overview IMS GLC LODE v1.0 Information Model IMS GLC LODE v1.0 Binding IMS GLC LODE v1.0 Best Practice &

Implementation Guide IMS GLC LODE v1.0 Conformance

Specification

AgendaAgenda Sept 2007: Charter approved Feb 2008:

Conceptual Model (candidate release)

Sept 2008: Interoperability demonstration

Oct 2008: Conceptual Model (release)

Sept 2007: Charter approved Feb 2008:

Conceptual Model (candidate release)

Sept 2008: Interoperability demonstration

Oct 2008: Conceptual Model (release)

Agenda (2)Agenda (2) Feb 2009:

Candidate final release

Nov 2009: Interoperability demonstration IMS Technical Advisory Board Vote Final release

Feb 2009: Candidate final release

Nov 2009: Interoperability demonstration IMS Technical Advisory Board Vote Final release