56
Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings

Moses Jenkins

Technical Conservation Group

Page 2: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Contents

• Traditionally constructed buildings

• Building elements: improvement options– Windows– Walls– Roofs– Floors– Doors

Page 3: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Vapour movement in a traditionally built home.

We can improve efficiency, but must be careful not to compromisethis dynamic.

Page 4: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Typical energy efficiency upgrade using expanded phenolic foam

Page 5: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Traditional passive ventilation systems

Page 6: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

If we get it wrong..

Page 7: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Windows

Page 8: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Draught Stripping

Page 9: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Existing options – shutters & blinds – gave significant improvements u-

value 1.8

Page 10: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Secondary glazing

Page 11: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Secondary glazing : U Value 1.7

Page 12: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

secondary glazing manufactured by a joiner

Page 13: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

new sealed units within existing sashes, u-value 1.3

Page 14: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

A new check is cut and the unit puttied in place

Page 15: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Upgraded sashes awaiting re-hanging

Page 16: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Walls

Page 17: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Historic Scotland research has examined 3 approaches to insulating mass masonry walls:

•Putting insulation behind existing wall lining

•Applying material directly to the masonry “on the hard”

•Framing out and putting material between the timber

Page 18: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

U-value improvement 68%

Bonded polystyrene bead u-value 0.31

Page 19: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

30mm Calcium silicate board applied directly to mass masonry

Page 20: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Preparation for application of board (left) and the build up of the board and finishing layers (right), u-

value improvement from 2.1 to 1

Page 21: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

10mm Aerogel blanket fixed directly to mass masonry

Page 22: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Aerogel blanket particularly useful on curved walls, u-value improved from 1.3 to 0.6

Page 23: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Where previous linings have been lost or are irreparable more substantial

interventions can be made

Page 24: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Hemp board – u-value 0.21

Thermal improvement 78%

Page 25: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

80mm Wood fibre board u value 0.19

Thermal improvement 81%

Page 26: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Clay board (right) ready for application of clay plaster (left)

Page 27: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

100mm cellulose fibre blown on the hard – U value 0.28

Thermal improvement 71%

Page 28: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Aerogel insulated board – 50mm u value 0.31

Thermal improvement 65%

Page 29: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

An important element of the testing program is monitoring of moisture build up

Page 30: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Moisture monitoring following the application of the insulation at Sword Street

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

May-2010 Jun-2010 Aug-2010 Sep-2010 Nov-2010 Jan-2011 Feb-2011

Max

imum

Dai

ly R

elati

ve H

umid

ity

[%]

50mm into Brick/Close Wall

Interface Close brickwall/Insulation

50mm into Stone/Exterior Wall

Interface Exterior WallStone/Insulation

Room (RHmax)

Page 31: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

External Insulation

Maybe not here…

Page 32: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

But what about here?

Page 33: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Wood fibre insulation, Glasgow

Page 34: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Negative visual impact of external insulation

Page 35: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Floors

Page 36: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Is it worth lifting this?

Page 37: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Sheep’s wool pinned to under floor joists

Page 38: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Hemp board between joists held in place with timber runners, u-value

improvement 2.4 to 0.7

Page 39: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Breathable?

Page 40: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Stone floors – can this be improved?

Page 41: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Laying the insulated floor as a homogenous layer

Page 42: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Concrete floors can be lifted and insulated lime concrete floor laid in its place

Page 43: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Lime concrete layer being mixed, laid and flags laid on top

Page 44: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Aerogel board placed over concrete floor, u-value improvement 3.9 to 0.8

Page 45: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Lofts and roof spaces

Page 46: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Should be 275mm thick whatever material used

Page 47: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Vapour permeable options most appropriate such as sheep’s wool or wood fibre board

Page 48: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Sheep’s wool between joists, u-value improvement 1.5 to 0.3

(wood fibre board u-value 0.2)

Page 49: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Insulating behind existing roof linings in inhabited loft space, u-value

improvement 1.6 to 0.8

Page 50: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Blowing bonded bead into a mansard dormer cheek insulation behind the plasterboard

Page 51: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Insulating between rafters using hemp / wool material

Page 52: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Doors

Page 53: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Door panels can be insulated to reduce heat loss, u-value improvement 3.9 to 0.8

Page 54: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Conclusion

• Vapour permeability and ventilation should be maintained throughout any energy upgrade work

• All elements of traditionally constructed buildings can be made more thermally efficient by the use of a range of materials and techniques

• It is vital that this work is carried out sensitively to both the aesthetic and performance of the building and ventilation vital to

Page 55: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

More details of all research available at Historic Scotland

website:

www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/technicalpapers

I can be contacted at [email protected]

Page 56: Improving Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings Moses Jenkins Technical Conservation Group

Which one has the best chance of still being useful in 100 years?