IBS OB - 05

  • Upload
    ritibha

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    1/42

    Organisational

    Behaviour

    (Sem I)

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    2/42

    GROUPS AND TEAMS

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    3/42

    What is a Group?

    Obviously, a group is more than simply a collection ofpeople.

    Group is a collection of two or more interacting

    individuals with a stable pattern of relationships

    between them who share common goals and who

    perceive themselves as being a group. Four key

    characteristics:

    Social interaction One of the most obviouscharacteristics of groups is that they are

    composed of two or more people in social

    interaction. The members of a social group

    must have some influence on each other.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    4/42

    What is a Group?

    Stability Groups also must possess a stable

    structure. A collection of individuals that

    constantly changes cannot be thought of as a

    group.

    Common interests or goals Members share

    common interests or goals.

    Recognition as being a group The

    individuals involved must perceive

    themselves as a group.

    Creating effective groups for project work, problem

    solving, creative activities, brainstorming and

    information gathering, resolution of conflicts, grievances

    and disputes.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    5/42

    Types ofGroups

    I) Formal Groups

    A group formed by management to accomplish the

    goals of the organization (formed due to the demands

    and processes of the organization).

    The accomplishment of these goals requires that certain

    tasks be performed and that employees be assigned to

    perform these tasks. As a result, most employees will

    be members of a group based on their position in theorganization.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    6/42

    Types ofGroups

    Command GroupThis group is specified by the organization

    chart and is made up of subordinates who

    repot directly to a given supervisor. Eg., the

    authority relationship between a department

    manager and the supervisors.

    Task Group

    This comprises of the employees who work

    together to complete a particular task or

    project. For eg., the nurses assigned to dutyin the emergency room of a hospital usually

    constitute a task group, since certain

    activities are required when a patient is

    treated.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    7/42

    Types ofGroups

    TeamIt is a formal group comprised of people

    interacting very closely together with a

    shared commitment to accomplish agreed

    upon objectives. Both command and task

    groups can be thought of as teams. However,

    because the concept of teams has become

    such a significant factor in organizational

    design and functioning in recent years, team

    is being treated as separate formal group.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    8/42

    Types ofGroups

    II) Informal GroupsThese groups develop naturally among an

    organizations personnel without any

    direction from the management of the

    organization within which they operate.

    Interest Groups

    A group that comes together to satisfy a

    common interest and disbands when the goal

    has been achieved. Eg., includes employees

    grouping together to present a unified front tomanagement for more benefits.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    9/42

    Types ofGroups

    II) Informal Groups Friendship Groups

    Informal groups that form because the

    members have something in common such

    as age, political beliefs, or ethnic

    background. Their interactions and

    communication extends to off-the-job

    activities.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    10/42

    Distinction between Formal and Informal Groups:

    The major difference formal groups are designated by

    the formal organization as a means to an end. Informal

    groups/interests are important for their own sake to

    satisfy a basic human need for association.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    11/42

    Stages ofGroup Development

    Although we cannot predict with perfect certaintyexactly how all groups will form, two systematic models

    of group development appear to be most descriptive

    the five-stage model and the punctuated-equilibrium

    model.

    The Five-Stage Model (B W Tuckman, 1965)

    This model identifies five distinct stages through

    which groups develop.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    12/42

    Stages ofGroup Development

    1. FORMING

    Characterised by uncertainty (frequently

    confusion) about the purpose, structure and

    leadership of the group. Group members

    efforts to understand and define their

    objectives, roles and assignments within the

    group. Patterns of interaction among group

    members are tried out and either discarded

    or adopted, at least temporarily. Generally,this stage is complete when individuals begin

    to view themselves as part of a group.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    13/42

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    14/42

    Stages ofGroup Development

    4. PERFORMING

    Structures and procedures are now in place

    and the group is ready to get on with the job

    in hand. The group is fully functional.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    15/42

    Stages ofGroup Development

    5. ADJOURNINGRefers to the disbanding of the group, perhaps

    because people move on, or because its task

    has been completed. For temporary groups,

    such as committees, project groups, task forces

    etc. this stage includes disbandment. Whereas,permanent groups may not reach this stage.

    Increasingly, adjournment is becoming an

    expected stage of group development,

    however. Many organizations rely on temporary

    groups for problem-solving tasks and product

    development like HP and 3M. At these

    organizations, project teams may have a life

    cycle ranging from less than a month to severalears.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    16/42

    Stages ofGroup Development

    Of course, not all groups progress smoothly and

    predictably through these stages. Numerous factors can

    either hinder or facilitate the process.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    17/42

    Stages ofGroup Development

    The Punctuated-Equilibrium Model (Gersick, 1988)

    Not all scientists agree groups develop in the order

    identified in the five-stage model. (This is an alternative

    model: for temporary groups with deadlines). They have

    their own unique sequencing of actions (or inaction).

    The conceptualization of group development claiming that

    groups generally plan their activities during the first half of

    their time together, and then revise and implement their

    plans in the second half.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    18/42

    Stages ofGroup Development

    Groups go through two stages marked by the

    midpoint of the groups time together. The first

    half is a period of equilibrium, in which the

    group makes plans, but accomplishes little.

    During the second half, group members make

    changes that lead them to accomplish the

    groups task as the deadline approaches.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    19/42

    Stages ofGroup Development

    The idea is: Groups develop inertia, which keeps

    them going (i.e. equilibrium) until the halfway

    point, when they realize that deadlines loom

    large. This stimulates them to confront

    important issues and to initiate changes,beginning (i.e. punctuating) a new equilibrium.

    This phase lasts until the group kicks into a

    final push just before the deadline.

    Although the punctuated-equilibrium model is

    relatively new, studies suggest that it does a

    good job of describing how groups develop.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    20/42

    Characteristics ofGroups

    To understand group behavior, one must be awareof the general characteristics of groups. Some

    of the more important ones are: composition,

    status hierarchy, roles, norms, leadership and

    cohesiveness.

    Composition the extent to which group

    members are alike. Homogenous groups are

    likely to be more cohesive whereas

    heterogeneous groups may outperform

    homogeneous ones in certain situations

    because they have a richer variety of

    knowledge and experience to draw upon.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    21/42

    Characteristics ofGroups

    y Status Hierarchy The status assigned to a

    particular position is typically a consequence of

    certain characteristics that differentiate one

    position from other positions. A person is given

    status because of such factors as job seniority,age or assignment. Eg., the oldest worker may

    be perceived as being more technically

    proficient and is attributed status by a group of

    technicians.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    22/42

    Characteristics ofGroups

    y Roles (the hats we wear) Each position in thegroup structure has an associated role that

    consists of the behaviors expected of the

    occupant of that position. Eg., a boss may be

    expected to give orders, and a teacher may be

    expected to lecture and to give exams. Role incumbent a person holding a particular

    role.

    Role expectations The behaviors expected of

    someone in a particular role.

    Role ambiguity Confusion arising from notknowing what one is expected to do as the holder

    of a role.

    Role differentiation The tendency for various

    specialized roles to emerge as groups develop.

    Role conflict When an individual is confronted

    by divergent role expectations.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    23/42

    Characteristics ofGroups

    y Norms (a groups unspoken rules) Generallyagreed upon informal rules that guide group

    members behavior. They represent shared

    ways of viewing the world. In many cases they

    may never be formally stated but somehow

    known by all group members e.g., establishingappropriate ways to dress.

    y Leadership The leadership role is an

    extremely crucial characteristic of group as the

    leader exerts influence over the other members

    of the group. Especially in formal groups the

    leader can reward or punish members who do

    not comply with the orders or rules.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    24/42

    Characteristics ofGroups

    y Cohesiveness Formal and informal groupsseem to possess a closeness or commonness

    of attitude, behavior, and performance. The

    strength of group members desires to remain a

    part of the group.

    Group think Highly cohesive groups can also

    be problematic. Irving Janis, defines groupthink

    as the deterioration of mental efficiency, reality

    testing, and moral judgement in the interest of

    group solidarity.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    25/42

    Groups and Teams

    Groups and teams are not the same. A group istwo or more individuals interacting with each

    other to accomplish a common goal. Teams

    are mature groups with a degree of member

    interdependence and motivation to achieve a

    common goal. Teams start out as groups, but

    not all groups become mature and

    interdependent or teams.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    26/42

    Groups and Teams Some Commonalities

    y Both formed when two or more individuals

    interact.

    y Both provide structure for the work and

    interaction of their members.

    y Members of both share a common goal(s).y Members of both can perform specific

    technical, leadership, problem-solving and

    emotional roles.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    27/42

    Teams: Special Kinds ofGroups

    A team may be defined as a group comprising of

    a small number of people with

    complementary skills who are committed to a

    common purpose or set of performance goals

    and approach for which they hold themselves

    mutually accountable.

    Teams have more cohesiveness, more

    responsibility, and use member talents moreeffectively than do other groups.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    28/42

    How Teams Differ from Groups

    In groups, performance typically depends on the

    work of individual members (individual work

    products). In teams, performance depends on

    both individual contributions and collective work

    products. Team focus on both individual and mutual

    accountability that is, they work together to

    produce an outcome that represents their joint

    contributions, and each team member shares

    responsibility for that outcome. In groups,individual performance is taken into consideration

    when it comes to issuing rewards. In groups, the

    supervisor holds individual members accountable

    for their work, whereas in teams, members hold

    themselves accountable.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    29/42

    Types of Teams

    Distinctions among teams can be made on the basis of size,composition, organizational level, duration (temp. vs

    permanent), objectives etc are a few possibly distinguishing

    characteristics. We will use a number of these to categorize

    important types of teams in organizations today.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    30/42

    Types of Teams

    Problem-Solving Teams

    As the name implies, these teams are formed to

    deal with problems be it a very specific and

    known problem or potential future problem(s).

    The life span of such teams may vary from a fewdays to many months, occasionally a year or

    longer.

    Quality circles are examples of permanent

    problem-solving teams. A QC is a small team of

    employees who meet on a regular basis, usuallyon company time, to recommend improvements

    and solve quality-related problems. Frequently, a

    part of total quality management efforts. Circles

    typically comprise 6 to 12 employees who.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    31/42

    Types of Teams

    Problem-Solving Teams

    who perform related jobs. Circle members

    are usually trained in group processes (for eg.,

    structured techniques for diagnosing problems

    and brainstorming).

    AT&T, for eg., has effectively used problem-

    solving teams to address customer needs,

    resulting in quicker response time and increased

    customer satisfaction.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    32/42

    Types of Teams

    Cross-Functional Teams

    A cross-functional team is one consisting of

    member from different functional departments

    (eg., engineering, accting, HR, mktg.). In most

    cases team members come from differentdepartments and different levels (mgrs. and non-

    mgrs.). Eg., cross-functional teams working on

    product design and testing include a product

    designer, engineers, purchasing and mktg.

    members, assembly workers, and even suppliers.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    33/42

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    34/42

    Types of Teams

    Research and Development Teams

    R&D teams are used to develop new products.

    Their use is most extensive in high-tech

    industries such as aviation, electronics and

    computers. R&D teams are usually composed ofrepresentatives of many different deptts. or

    functions in the organization. Eg., a computer

    company may form a R&D team made up of

    representatives from mktg., sales, engineering,

    purchasing and finance to develop plans for anew product.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    35/42

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    36/42

    Team Effectiveness

    To develop effective teams:

    Training

    According to research some of the skill highly

    desirable for team members to be effective

    are: Open-mindedness

    Emotional stability

    Accountability

    Problem-solving abilities

    Communication skills

    Conflict resolution skills

    Trust

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    37/42

    Team Effectiveness

    Communication

    An increased need for information. The failure of

    many team efforts unwillingness to share

    information.

    Empowerment Along with information, teams must have the

    authority to make decisions and act automously.

    Whether a problem-solving team, an R&D team

    or an SMT, teams that lack authority are generally

    less effective.

    RewardsThe reward system in most organizations is

    individually based i.e. individual performance.

    Team success must be factored in and team

    performance should be rewarded.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    38/42

    Group Decision Making

    In most organizations, a great deal of decision makingis achieved through committees, teams, task forces,

    and other kinds of groups. This is because managers

    frequently face situations in which they must seek and

    combine judgments in group meetings. This is

    especially true for non-programmed problems, whichare novel and have much uncertainty regarding the

    outcome. In most organizations, it is unusual to find

    decisions being made on such problems by one

    individual on a regular basis.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    39/42

    Group Decision Making

    In terms of the decision-making process itself, groups

    superior:

    Inestablishing goals and objectives

    In identifying causes and developing

    alternative solutions In evaluating alternative solutions

    In solution selection

    When it comes to implementation and follow-up of adecision, whether or not made by a group, usually

    accomplished by individual managers. Thus, since a

    group ordinarily is not responsible for implementation

    and follow-up necessarily rests with the individual

    manager.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    40/42

    Techniques forGroup Decision Making

    BrainstormingThe generation of ideas in a group through

    non-critical discussion. The basic rules are:

    Avoid criticizing others ideas

    Share even far-out suggestions

    Offer as many comments as possible Build on others ideas to create your own

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    41/42

    Techniques forGroup Decision Making

    Delphi TechniqueA method of improving group decisions using

    the opinions of experts, which are solicited by

    mail/questionnaire and then compiled. The

    expert consensus of opinions is used to

    make a decision.

    DT retains the advantage of having several

    judges while removing the biasing effects that

    might occur during face-to-face interaction.

  • 8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.

    42/42

    Techniques forGroup Decision Making

    Nominal Group Technique

    The nominal group technique structures face-to-

    face group meetings in such a way that the open

    expression and evaluation of ideas is encouraged.

    Steps: A small group gathers around a table and

    receives instructions; problem is identified Participants privately write down ideas about

    solutions

    Each participants ideas are presented, one at a

    time, and are written on a chart until all the ideas

    are expressed. Each idea is discussed, clarified, and evaluated

    by group members

    Participants privately rank the ideas in order of

    their preference.

    The highest-ranking idea is taken as the groups

    decision.