Upload
ritibha
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
1/42
Organisational
Behaviour
(Sem I)
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
2/42
GROUPS AND TEAMS
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
3/42
What is a Group?
Obviously, a group is more than simply a collection ofpeople.
Group is a collection of two or more interacting
individuals with a stable pattern of relationships
between them who share common goals and who
perceive themselves as being a group. Four key
characteristics:
Social interaction One of the most obviouscharacteristics of groups is that they are
composed of two or more people in social
interaction. The members of a social group
must have some influence on each other.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
4/42
What is a Group?
Stability Groups also must possess a stable
structure. A collection of individuals that
constantly changes cannot be thought of as a
group.
Common interests or goals Members share
common interests or goals.
Recognition as being a group The
individuals involved must perceive
themselves as a group.
Creating effective groups for project work, problem
solving, creative activities, brainstorming and
information gathering, resolution of conflicts, grievances
and disputes.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
5/42
Types ofGroups
I) Formal Groups
A group formed by management to accomplish the
goals of the organization (formed due to the demands
and processes of the organization).
The accomplishment of these goals requires that certain
tasks be performed and that employees be assigned to
perform these tasks. As a result, most employees will
be members of a group based on their position in theorganization.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
6/42
Types ofGroups
Command GroupThis group is specified by the organization
chart and is made up of subordinates who
repot directly to a given supervisor. Eg., the
authority relationship between a department
manager and the supervisors.
Task Group
This comprises of the employees who work
together to complete a particular task or
project. For eg., the nurses assigned to dutyin the emergency room of a hospital usually
constitute a task group, since certain
activities are required when a patient is
treated.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
7/42
Types ofGroups
TeamIt is a formal group comprised of people
interacting very closely together with a
shared commitment to accomplish agreed
upon objectives. Both command and task
groups can be thought of as teams. However,
because the concept of teams has become
such a significant factor in organizational
design and functioning in recent years, team
is being treated as separate formal group.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
8/42
Types ofGroups
II) Informal GroupsThese groups develop naturally among an
organizations personnel without any
direction from the management of the
organization within which they operate.
Interest Groups
A group that comes together to satisfy a
common interest and disbands when the goal
has been achieved. Eg., includes employees
grouping together to present a unified front tomanagement for more benefits.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
9/42
Types ofGroups
II) Informal Groups Friendship Groups
Informal groups that form because the
members have something in common such
as age, political beliefs, or ethnic
background. Their interactions and
communication extends to off-the-job
activities.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
10/42
Distinction between Formal and Informal Groups:
The major difference formal groups are designated by
the formal organization as a means to an end. Informal
groups/interests are important for their own sake to
satisfy a basic human need for association.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
11/42
Stages ofGroup Development
Although we cannot predict with perfect certaintyexactly how all groups will form, two systematic models
of group development appear to be most descriptive
the five-stage model and the punctuated-equilibrium
model.
The Five-Stage Model (B W Tuckman, 1965)
This model identifies five distinct stages through
which groups develop.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
12/42
Stages ofGroup Development
1. FORMING
Characterised by uncertainty (frequently
confusion) about the purpose, structure and
leadership of the group. Group members
efforts to understand and define their
objectives, roles and assignments within the
group. Patterns of interaction among group
members are tried out and either discarded
or adopted, at least temporarily. Generally,this stage is complete when individuals begin
to view themselves as part of a group.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
13/42
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
14/42
Stages ofGroup Development
4. PERFORMING
Structures and procedures are now in place
and the group is ready to get on with the job
in hand. The group is fully functional.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
15/42
Stages ofGroup Development
5. ADJOURNINGRefers to the disbanding of the group, perhaps
because people move on, or because its task
has been completed. For temporary groups,
such as committees, project groups, task forces
etc. this stage includes disbandment. Whereas,permanent groups may not reach this stage.
Increasingly, adjournment is becoming an
expected stage of group development,
however. Many organizations rely on temporary
groups for problem-solving tasks and product
development like HP and 3M. At these
organizations, project teams may have a life
cycle ranging from less than a month to severalears.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
16/42
Stages ofGroup Development
Of course, not all groups progress smoothly and
predictably through these stages. Numerous factors can
either hinder or facilitate the process.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
17/42
Stages ofGroup Development
The Punctuated-Equilibrium Model (Gersick, 1988)
Not all scientists agree groups develop in the order
identified in the five-stage model. (This is an alternative
model: for temporary groups with deadlines). They have
their own unique sequencing of actions (or inaction).
The conceptualization of group development claiming that
groups generally plan their activities during the first half of
their time together, and then revise and implement their
plans in the second half.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
18/42
Stages ofGroup Development
Groups go through two stages marked by the
midpoint of the groups time together. The first
half is a period of equilibrium, in which the
group makes plans, but accomplishes little.
During the second half, group members make
changes that lead them to accomplish the
groups task as the deadline approaches.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
19/42
Stages ofGroup Development
The idea is: Groups develop inertia, which keeps
them going (i.e. equilibrium) until the halfway
point, when they realize that deadlines loom
large. This stimulates them to confront
important issues and to initiate changes,beginning (i.e. punctuating) a new equilibrium.
This phase lasts until the group kicks into a
final push just before the deadline.
Although the punctuated-equilibrium model is
relatively new, studies suggest that it does a
good job of describing how groups develop.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
20/42
Characteristics ofGroups
To understand group behavior, one must be awareof the general characteristics of groups. Some
of the more important ones are: composition,
status hierarchy, roles, norms, leadership and
cohesiveness.
Composition the extent to which group
members are alike. Homogenous groups are
likely to be more cohesive whereas
heterogeneous groups may outperform
homogeneous ones in certain situations
because they have a richer variety of
knowledge and experience to draw upon.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
21/42
Characteristics ofGroups
y Status Hierarchy The status assigned to a
particular position is typically a consequence of
certain characteristics that differentiate one
position from other positions. A person is given
status because of such factors as job seniority,age or assignment. Eg., the oldest worker may
be perceived as being more technically
proficient and is attributed status by a group of
technicians.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
22/42
Characteristics ofGroups
y Roles (the hats we wear) Each position in thegroup structure has an associated role that
consists of the behaviors expected of the
occupant of that position. Eg., a boss may be
expected to give orders, and a teacher may be
expected to lecture and to give exams. Role incumbent a person holding a particular
role.
Role expectations The behaviors expected of
someone in a particular role.
Role ambiguity Confusion arising from notknowing what one is expected to do as the holder
of a role.
Role differentiation The tendency for various
specialized roles to emerge as groups develop.
Role conflict When an individual is confronted
by divergent role expectations.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
23/42
Characteristics ofGroups
y Norms (a groups unspoken rules) Generallyagreed upon informal rules that guide group
members behavior. They represent shared
ways of viewing the world. In many cases they
may never be formally stated but somehow
known by all group members e.g., establishingappropriate ways to dress.
y Leadership The leadership role is an
extremely crucial characteristic of group as the
leader exerts influence over the other members
of the group. Especially in formal groups the
leader can reward or punish members who do
not comply with the orders or rules.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
24/42
Characteristics ofGroups
y Cohesiveness Formal and informal groupsseem to possess a closeness or commonness
of attitude, behavior, and performance. The
strength of group members desires to remain a
part of the group.
Group think Highly cohesive groups can also
be problematic. Irving Janis, defines groupthink
as the deterioration of mental efficiency, reality
testing, and moral judgement in the interest of
group solidarity.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
25/42
Groups and Teams
Groups and teams are not the same. A group istwo or more individuals interacting with each
other to accomplish a common goal. Teams
are mature groups with a degree of member
interdependence and motivation to achieve a
common goal. Teams start out as groups, but
not all groups become mature and
interdependent or teams.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
26/42
Groups and Teams Some Commonalities
y Both formed when two or more individuals
interact.
y Both provide structure for the work and
interaction of their members.
y Members of both share a common goal(s).y Members of both can perform specific
technical, leadership, problem-solving and
emotional roles.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
27/42
Teams: Special Kinds ofGroups
A team may be defined as a group comprising of
a small number of people with
complementary skills who are committed to a
common purpose or set of performance goals
and approach for which they hold themselves
mutually accountable.
Teams have more cohesiveness, more
responsibility, and use member talents moreeffectively than do other groups.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
28/42
How Teams Differ from Groups
In groups, performance typically depends on the
work of individual members (individual work
products). In teams, performance depends on
both individual contributions and collective work
products. Team focus on both individual and mutual
accountability that is, they work together to
produce an outcome that represents their joint
contributions, and each team member shares
responsibility for that outcome. In groups,individual performance is taken into consideration
when it comes to issuing rewards. In groups, the
supervisor holds individual members accountable
for their work, whereas in teams, members hold
themselves accountable.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
29/42
Types of Teams
Distinctions among teams can be made on the basis of size,composition, organizational level, duration (temp. vs
permanent), objectives etc are a few possibly distinguishing
characteristics. We will use a number of these to categorize
important types of teams in organizations today.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
30/42
Types of Teams
Problem-Solving Teams
As the name implies, these teams are formed to
deal with problems be it a very specific and
known problem or potential future problem(s).
The life span of such teams may vary from a fewdays to many months, occasionally a year or
longer.
Quality circles are examples of permanent
problem-solving teams. A QC is a small team of
employees who meet on a regular basis, usuallyon company time, to recommend improvements
and solve quality-related problems. Frequently, a
part of total quality management efforts. Circles
typically comprise 6 to 12 employees who.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
31/42
Types of Teams
Problem-Solving Teams
who perform related jobs. Circle members
are usually trained in group processes (for eg.,
structured techniques for diagnosing problems
and brainstorming).
AT&T, for eg., has effectively used problem-
solving teams to address customer needs,
resulting in quicker response time and increased
customer satisfaction.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
32/42
Types of Teams
Cross-Functional Teams
A cross-functional team is one consisting of
member from different functional departments
(eg., engineering, accting, HR, mktg.). In most
cases team members come from differentdepartments and different levels (mgrs. and non-
mgrs.). Eg., cross-functional teams working on
product design and testing include a product
designer, engineers, purchasing and mktg.
members, assembly workers, and even suppliers.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
33/42
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
34/42
Types of Teams
Research and Development Teams
R&D teams are used to develop new products.
Their use is most extensive in high-tech
industries such as aviation, electronics and
computers. R&D teams are usually composed ofrepresentatives of many different deptts. or
functions in the organization. Eg., a computer
company may form a R&D team made up of
representatives from mktg., sales, engineering,
purchasing and finance to develop plans for anew product.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
35/42
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
36/42
Team Effectiveness
To develop effective teams:
Training
According to research some of the skill highly
desirable for team members to be effective
are: Open-mindedness
Emotional stability
Accountability
Problem-solving abilities
Communication skills
Conflict resolution skills
Trust
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
37/42
Team Effectiveness
Communication
An increased need for information. The failure of
many team efforts unwillingness to share
information.
Empowerment Along with information, teams must have the
authority to make decisions and act automously.
Whether a problem-solving team, an R&D team
or an SMT, teams that lack authority are generally
less effective.
RewardsThe reward system in most organizations is
individually based i.e. individual performance.
Team success must be factored in and team
performance should be rewarded.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
38/42
Group Decision Making
In most organizations, a great deal of decision makingis achieved through committees, teams, task forces,
and other kinds of groups. This is because managers
frequently face situations in which they must seek and
combine judgments in group meetings. This is
especially true for non-programmed problems, whichare novel and have much uncertainty regarding the
outcome. In most organizations, it is unusual to find
decisions being made on such problems by one
individual on a regular basis.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
39/42
Group Decision Making
In terms of the decision-making process itself, groups
superior:
Inestablishing goals and objectives
In identifying causes and developing
alternative solutions In evaluating alternative solutions
In solution selection
When it comes to implementation and follow-up of adecision, whether or not made by a group, usually
accomplished by individual managers. Thus, since a
group ordinarily is not responsible for implementation
and follow-up necessarily rests with the individual
manager.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
40/42
Techniques forGroup Decision Making
BrainstormingThe generation of ideas in a group through
non-critical discussion. The basic rules are:
Avoid criticizing others ideas
Share even far-out suggestions
Offer as many comments as possible Build on others ideas to create your own
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
41/42
Techniques forGroup Decision Making
Delphi TechniqueA method of improving group decisions using
the opinions of experts, which are solicited by
mail/questionnaire and then compiled. The
expert consensus of opinions is used to
make a decision.
DT retains the advantage of having several
judges while removing the biasing effects that
might occur during face-to-face interaction.
8/6/2019 IBS OB - 05.
42/42
Techniques forGroup Decision Making
Nominal Group Technique
The nominal group technique structures face-to-
face group meetings in such a way that the open
expression and evaluation of ideas is encouraged.
Steps: A small group gathers around a table and
receives instructions; problem is identified Participants privately write down ideas about
solutions
Each participants ideas are presented, one at a
time, and are written on a chart until all the ideas
are expressed. Each idea is discussed, clarified, and evaluated
by group members
Participants privately rank the ideas in order of
their preference.
The highest-ranking idea is taken as the groups
decision.