Upload
phamthu
View
234
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Task: Hydrocarbon Removal
• Design cost-effective pretreatment system for
hydrocarbon fouling of a polymeric RO
membrane
• Must be demonstrable in applications where
200 ppm of hydrocarbons exist and must be
removed from industrial water
Design Considerations
• Hydrocarbon recipe is a 50/50 (by
volume) mixture of mineral spirits and
diesel (non-vegetable oil or ethanol
additive)
• The water sample is 3000ppm NaCl and
180ppm of the hydrocarbon mixture
What is Reverse Osmosis (RO)? • Desalination process used to treat
process wastewater/hydrocarbon
recovery water
• Apply pressure (enough to overcome
osmotic pressure) to feed water so that
it moves through a semi-permeable
membrane
• Removes ionic and molecular sized
substances
http://www.sustainableplant.com/2012/04/make-the-most-of-reverse-
osmosis-membranes/
http://www.lenntech.com/membrane-fouling.htm
Potential Solutions
• Pre-treatment of influent
– Ultrafiltration
• clogging
– Biological treatment
• sludge disposal
– Mechanical Removal
• activated carbon
• Fouled Membrane Treatment – Chemical removal of hydrocarbons
• Expensive, destroys membrane, downtime
– Replace Membrane
Rice
http://www.scu.edu/profiles/images/green_technologies.jpg
http://www.ricehusk.com/content/menu_102/products
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/is-rice-unhealthy/
720 mil ton
158 mil ton
Rice Production
• United States:
20 billion lbs.
• Louisiana: 2.7
billion lbs.
http://www.menurice.com/all-about-
rice/meet-us-rice-farmers
http://www.usarice.com/doclib/188/219/367
7.PDF
Organic material and moisture 73.85%
Al2O3 1.23%
Fe2O3 1.28%
CaO 1.24%
MgO 0.21%
SiO2 22.11%
MnO2 0.07%
Content of Rice Husk (wt%)
a-cellulose 45.59%
Lignin 23.17%
D-xylose 18.45%
L-arabinose 6.88%
Methylglucuronic acid
3.44%
D-galactose 2.47%
Amount Organics present in RH (wt%)
Silica(SiO2) 87.59%
Aumina(Al2O3) 4.30%
Sulfur trioxide(SO3) 0.85%
Iron oxide(Fe2O3) 0.45%
Calcium oxide(CaO) 4.20%
Magnesium-oxide(MgO)
0.27%
Sodium oxide(Na2O)
0.73%
Potassium oxide(K2O)
1.59%
Amount Present in Rice Husk Ash (wt%)
Rice Husk ASH
• What is it
– Rice husk that have been combusted in an
oxygen deprived environment
• How we used it
– ASH has an affinity for hydrocarbon
• Why
– Sustainable use of waste byproduct
Ash Production in Bulk
• Limit the amount of Oxygen entering the
reaction during the burning of the rice
hulls
• Retains more volume
• Better Absorption
• More efficient use of the rice hulls
• Less cost
Standard for Measurement
Lab Standard based on 1 L
1L Deionized H2O
+
3,000mg NaCl
+
.24mL Hydrocarbon solution
Calibration Curve
y = 177.58x + 282.4 R² = 0.98773
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
GC
Pek A
rea
Concentration (mg/L)
• Used Langmuir Isotherm to approximate mass
of Ash needed for lab standard (~17g)
y = 4.9053x R² = 0.99607
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Cs/C
e
Ce (mg/L)
Langmuir Isotherm
Physical Application of
Rice Hull Ash
– Direct application to LNAPL (manually on top)
• Determine ash affinity for hydrocarbons
– Ash as a simple filter
• Ash packed in cylinder
– Turbulent action utilizing density separation
• hydrocyclone
What is the cost of this ash?
05
101520253035404550
Arkansas Louisiana California AverageSouthern
States
$/ton
4 Feb 2013 Rice Market News
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Co
st (
$)
Miles
Transport of Rice Hulls Cost per Ton
2004
2012
2004: $1.45 vs. 2012: $1.76
http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
What is the cost of this ash?
$1,460 per day for ash
$534,000 annually for ash
+ $47,000 to transport from local source
+ $267,000 in operational costs (i.e. wages, etc.)
= $848,000 for an entire year
Cogeneration Power
• Rice hulls as a biomass: 3.66 kwh/kg
• Generation of power from biomass: 0.12
$/kwh
• Gain from burning: 0.44 $/kg
• Daily gain from kwh produced: $29,100
• Annual gain from kwh produced:
$10,600,000
Capital costs gains/losses
• Transformation of waste to use
• Recovers product and gains $700,000
in energy from burning hydrocarbons
• Neglecting facility operational costs, a
factor of 12.5 EROI
• Note with estimated costs and EROI of
6.8
Conclusion of Experiments • Filter design
– Great hydrocarbon removal
– not efficient and turbid effluent is problematic
• Cyclone design
– Good hydrocarbon removal
– Good mass separation
• Dispersed air floatation
– Combines best qualities of both designs
– Use of dispersed air increases hydrocarbon
removal
– Achieves goal of hydrocarbon removal