13
HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

HUNTING CAMP FACILITYBY: Ryan Fremin

ET 494 Senior Design II

Construction Engineering Technology

Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras

Advisor : Mr. Rode

Page 2: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

PURPOSE

Perform complete theoretical construction process of hunting camp facility Research Needed Location Selection Giving Structure Options Rough Drawing and Estimates Design Selection Complete drawings, schedule, and estimate

Page 3: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

WHY HUNTING

In 2011 there was a total of 13.7 million hunters in the United States

23 % of all wild-life recreation is found in hunting

(US Census Bureau)

$564,385,000 Was spent in 2011 for trip–related hunting in Louisiana

$315,763,000 Was spent in 2011 for trip-related hunting in Mississippi

Louisiana-16 % Mississippi- 36 %

Page 4: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

RESEARCH

The given statistics show that this can be a lucrative business.

Current pricing for pay hunts Lodging---------$1000-$2000 Hunting-----Min------$ 4,000 (8-Point)

Mississippi is in the top 15 places that hunters like to hunt Shows profitability and demand

Page 5: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

DESIGN OPTIONS

LOG CABIN

Will give the owner and customers a more luxurious feel with all of the necessities.

Less cost effective

PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING

Will give the owner and customers all of the necessities with the option of adding luxuries after design and pricing is completed.

Cost Effective (Key for this build)

Page 6: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

LOG CABIN

Example ( Gile’s Island)

Nice facility to conduct business

Most need separate buildings for lodging (Total- 6700 sq.ft.)

Lodging takes up possible land and reduces amount of huntable property

Popular but expensive to construct

Page 7: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING

Example ( Converted Metal Building)

Cost effective Fast Construction Combines facilities into

one location Gives added space for

possible upgrades 40’x80’( total – 7200

sq.ft.)

Page 8: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

ROUGH DRAWING – LOG CABIN

Page 9: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

ROUGH DRAWING – METAL BUILDING

Page 10: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

DESIGN DECISION

Pre-Engineered Metal Building

$456,264 Log Cabin

$507,400 Difference

$ 51,136 or 10% cheaper

Page 11: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

DETAILED DRAWINGS

The detailed drawings will be done from the last week of the semester into the break. They will be continued while doing a material takeoff at the same time.

This will allow sufficient time to complete drawings and estimate.

Page 12: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

TIMELINE

Jan 21-Jan 24 First Week Back to Classes

Jan 27-Jan 31 Update Powerpoint for Semester

Feb 3 –Feb 7 Continue Drawings/Material Takedown

Feb 10 – Feb 14 Continue Drawings/ Material Takedown

Feb 17 –Feb 21 

Continue Drawing/ Material Takedown

Feb 24– Feb 28 Finish drawings

Mar 3–Mar 7 Complete Survey of Location

Mar 10–Mar 14 Determine Foundation Plan

Mar 17– Mar 21 Begin Estimate

Mar 24- Mar28 Cont. Estimate

Page 13: HUNTING CAMP FACILITY BY: Ryan Fremin ET 494 Senior Design II Construction Engineering Technology Professor: Dr. Koutsougeras Advisor : Mr. Rode

TIMELINE (CONT.)

Mar 31– April 4 Produce Final Estimate

April 7- April 11 Begin Planning and Scheduling

April 14 – April 18 Cont. Planning and Scheduling

April 21– April 25 Complete Planning and Scheduling

April 28– May 2 Begin Finalizing Project

May 5– May 9 Complete Final Project