Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
From: Arnie Rosner <[email protected]>Subject: The Dictator has spoken!
Date: April 28, 2010 11:45:06 PM PDTTo: [email protected], Dana Rohrabacher
<[email protected]>Cc: Arnie Rosner <[email protected]>
Bcc: Politics-02, Arnie Rosner <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], "RICHARD M. KEEFNER" <[email protected]>, [email protected], shirley <[email protected]>, Tim Harrinton <[email protected]>, [email protected], Carl Swensson <[email protected]>, bobjen3 <[email protected]>6 Attachments, 14.8 MB
Dear Congressman Rohrabacher,
How does this grab you.....
As you requested...
I am providing you with documents that lead me to suspect Mr. Obama is indeed a fraud.
Arnie Available 24/7 -‐ Defending freedom is no part-‐time [email protected]‐964-‐4056714-‐501-‐8247 -‐ mobile
Getting a taste of constituent treatment. The conspiracy in which Congress is participating is coming home to roost?
Obama administration defies congressional subpoena on Fort Hood documentsBy Craig WhitlockWashington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, April 27, 2010; 3:00 PM
(More details follow)
By the way...might just seem like a good time to revisit the eligibility issue...don't you think? So maybe now that OB has you and the rest
in a box he no longer needs to honor the dignity of the People's house?So maybe the CRS reports were not so reliable? Maybe the information on which the entire Congress was led to believe that the illegal alien usurper was eligible was deliberately fraudulent? Maybe the entire 111th Congress and the Supreme Court got scammed? Could that be?
Can you believe that...? The smartest group of legislators in the world, scammed by what may turn out to be a snake oil salesman.
Don't you think you should stop appearing so stupid and investigate for yourselves? Don't you think something as important as our national security is more important than the word of someone who could probably not even get a driver's license in Washington DC?
Well now...maybe everyone should re-examine the information for themselves?
CRS Report …ility (12.5 MB)
Now if you find this report from the CRS, shocking, by now, you might be looking for some answers. Can't say I blame you. Looks like you were deliberately set up; made to look pretty foolish.
pretty foolish.
So how about these for starters? But before we even get to the analysis, the burning question in my mind as I am sure it is in yours....just who directed the CRS to provide this information which is so obviously tainted?
The following analysis was provided by an independent researcher who evaluated this report. Now this is just my opinion here Congressman Rohrabacher, but it seems the many years of hard earned reputation for quality unbiased research held to the highest standards of ethics, just like everything else Mr. Obama's administration touches, has been thrown in the crapper. (Oh...did I say that?)
Please review this information for yourself.
Obama administration defies congressional subpoena on Fort Hood documentsBy Craig WhitlockWashington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, April 27, 2010; 3:00 PM
The Obama administration said Tuesday it would provide more information to Congress about the Fort Hood shootings but continued to defy a subpoena request for witness statements and other documents.
After days of negotiations, the Pentagon and Justice Department informed a Senate committee
that they would not comply with congressional subpoenas to share investigative records from the Nov. 5 shootings at Fort Hood, Tex., which killed 13 people. The agencies said that divulging the material could jeopardize their prosecution of Army Maj. Nidal M. Hasan, the accused gunman.
The Pentagon did budge in other areas, however, saying it had agreed to give the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs access to Hasan's personnel file, as well as part of an Army report that scrutinized why superiors failed to intervene in Hasan's career as an Army psychiatrist, despite signs of his religious radicalization and shortcomings as a soldier.
Leslie Phillips, a spokeswoman for the Senate committee, called the refusal by the Pentagon and the Justice Department to hand over all the requested material "an affront to Congress's constitutional obligation to conduct independent oversight of the executive branch."
She said the committee, chaired by Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.), was still deciding whether to pursue the subpoenas in court. The committee has complained that the Obama administration has been stonewalling it for months over its Hasan probe, prompting it to issue the subpoenas April 19.
Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said the Defense Department has tried to cooperate as much as possible with the Senate investigation.
"We feel as though we have leaned very far forward," Morrell said. "This is as far as we are prepared to go."He said that Deputy Defense SecretaryWilliam J. Lynn III spoke Friday with Lieberman and Sen. Susan Collins(Maine), the committee's ranking Republican, in an attempt to resolve the dispute but added that he didn't know whether the Obama administration's offer would be enough to satisfy the panel.
Arnie
