Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
High rates of precocious male maturation, “minijacks”, in spring Chinook salmon hatchery
programs: Prevalence, causes and potential solutions.
Don Larsen, Brian Beckman, Walt Dickhoff - NOAA Fisheries
Kathy Cooper, Paul Parkins - University of Washington
Dave Fast, Charles Strom, Mark Johnston, - Yakama Nation Fisheries
AgeAge--2 “Minijacks”2 “Minijacks”
AgeAge--1 “Precocious parr”1 “Precocious parr”
SmoltingSmolting
SubSub--adultsadults1+ yr1+ yr
SpringSpring
OceanOcean
Spring Chinook SalmonSpring Chinook SalmonSpawning Spawning -- FallFall FryFry
AgeAge--4 4 AgeAge--55
Oce
an to
rive
r in
sprin
gO
cean
to ri
ver i
n sp
ring
AgeAge--3 M3 M
JackJack
ParrParr
Variation in Age of Male Maturity
Factors Affecting Age of Maturation
Mature male salmon
GeneticsEnvironment
• temperature• food availability• food quality
Growth &
Body energy stores
The Hatchery environment can significantly influence age of maturation
The Yakima River Basin
Columbia RiverPacificOcean
Prosser Dam
John Day Dam
We’ve been monitoring the physiology of Cle Elum Hatchery Spring Chinook since implementation in 1997
BYBY Release #Release # % of males% of males # Minijacks# Minijacks
On average 50% of male Yakima hatchery spring Chinook On average 50% of male Yakima hatchery spring Chinook precociously matured at ageprecociously matured at age--22
19971997 386,048386,048 44%44% 84,93184,931
19981998 589,683589,683 72%72% 211,107211,107
19991999 758,789758,789 50%50% 189,697189,697
20002000 834,285834,285 37%37% 153,508153,508
20012001 370,236370,236 52%52% 95,52095,520
Avg. 50%Avg. 50%
Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., Cooper, K.A., Barrett, D., Johnston, M., Swanson, P., and Dickhoff, W.W. (2004). Assessment of high rates of precocious male maturation in a spring Chinook salmon supplementation hatchery program. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 133, 98-120.
How do we assess precocious male maturation?
TestesTestes
AgeAge--2 immature male chinook salmon2 immature male chinook salmon
MayMay
TestesTestes
AgeAge--2 precocious male chinook salmon2 precocious male chinook salmon
MayMay
Plasma 11Plasma 11--ketotestosterone ketotestosterone (11(11--KT)KT)
Major androgen in teleost fishMajor androgen in teleost fish
Instrumental in the regulation of spermatogenesisInstrumental in the regulation of spermatogenesis
OO
OOOHOH
00
55
1010
1515
2020Plasma Plasma
1111--KetoKeto--TestosteroneTestosterone
(ng/ml)(ng/ml) **
*
**** ***
***(161.8±12.6)(161.8±12.6)
Dec Jan Feb Apr May Jun SepDec Jan Feb Apr May Jun Sep(Campbell et al. 2004)(Campbell et al. 2004)
Laboratory based studies have clearly established thatLaboratory based studies have clearly established that1111--ketotestosterone (11ketotestosterone (11--KT) is significantly elevated in KT) is significantly elevated in
precocious males as much as a year prior to matingprecocious males as much as a year prior to mating
Precocious malePrecocious male
Immature maleImmature male* *
*
Every March the Yakima Chinook are screened for pathology just prior to volitional release
48%48%52%52%
Threshold Threshold (0.8 ng/ml)(0.8 ng/ml)
N = 541N = 541
0055
101015152020252530303535404045455050
Coun
tCo
unt
--1.751.75 --1.251.25 --.75.75 --.25.25 .25.25 .75.75 1.251.25 1.751.75
LogLog1010
1111--KT (ng/ml)KT (ng/ml)
Immature Maturing
Plasmacollection
Consequences of high levels of precocious maturation
Ecological impactsEcological impactsGenetic impactsGenetic impacts
Increased strayingIncreased straying
Skewed gender ratioSkewed gender ratio
Loss of adult productionLoss of adult production
Critical periods for maturation decision Critical periods for maturation decision –– based on body size/growth ratebased on body size/growth rate
00
1010
2020
3030
4040
5050
J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S
Body weight Body weight (g)(g)
FallFalldecision perioddecision period
SpringSpringdecision perioddecision period
SpawningSpawning
Fast growth = YesFast growth = Yes
Slow growth = NoSlow growth = No
Fast growth = YesFast growth = Yes
Fast growth = YesFast growth = Yes
MatureMature
ImmatureImmature
Comparison of wild and hatchery Comparison of wild and hatchery growth and minijack ratesgrowth and minijack rates
Minijacks(%)Minijacks(%)
25
50
75
0
J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S
FallFalldecision perioddecision period
BodyBodyWeightWeight
(g)(g)
4
8
16
20
WildWild
Hatchery BY97
Hatchery BY98Hatchery BY98
0
12
Results from this study provided the basis for production scale rearing regimes (BY 2002-2004)
Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., Strom, C.R., Parkins, P.J., Cooper, K.A., Fast, D.E., and Dickhoff, W.W. 2006. Growth modulation alters the incidence of early male maturation and physiological development of hatchery reared spring Chinook salmon: a comparison with wild fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 135, 1017-1032.
Lab scale studies:Autumn Growth RateBody size
Weigh
t (g
)
Low
High
MonthF M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J
2004 20050
10
20
Pond4/14/05
Growth rate was adjusted via ration (BY 2002-2004)
Alteredration
Sameration
2.5-5oC
30/#
45/#
Did Growth Modulation reduce the minijack rate?
BY 2003BY 2002 BY 2004
Minijack rates before release were consistently lower in the Low growth Trt.
High Low High Low
% o
f M
inija
cks
High Low0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60a
b a
b
a
b
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Minijacks rate(% males)
10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Weight (g)
Pre-Growth Expt.BY 2000, 2001
R2
= 0.53P < 0.0001
High GrowthBY 2002-2004
Low GrowthBY 2002-2004
Post-GrowthExpt. BY 2005
The bigger they are at release, the higher the minijack rate (BY X acc.site, BY 2000-BY 2005)
What happened to juvenile and adult survival?
Juvenile Survival Index to McNary Dam is lower for the Low growth fish
0
.04
.08
.12
.16
.2
.24
Juv.
Sur
v. I
ndex
0
.04
.08
.12
.16
.2
.24
Modified from Neeley 2004-2006
High Low High Low
BY 2003BY 2002 BY 2004
0.05.1
.15.2
.25.3
.35
High Low
Adult Return, is lower for Low Growth Trt.Brood Year 2002
0102030405060708090
100
Age-3 Age-4 Age-5 Combined
PIT
Det
ectio
ns a
t Bon
n.
HighLow
Brood Year 2003
0
5
10
15
20
25
Age-3 Age-4 Age-5 Combined
PIT
Det
ectio
ns a
t Bon
n.
HighLow
Bosch 2007
Brood Year 2004
02468
10121416
Age-3 Age-4 Age-5 Combined
PIT
Det
ectio
ns a
t Bon
n.
HighLow
Loss due toPrecocious maturation
Loss due to small smolt size
How do we produce large fish that still grow slow in the autumn maturation initiation period? Earlier Pond Time
Where do the minijacks go?
How do hatchery rates compare with wild rates?
The Yakima River Basin
Columbia RiverPacificOcean
Prosser Dam
John Day Dam
Minijack rates of migrating hatchery and wild fish - Chandler smolt bypass facility
Minijacks (% of males)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
55
50
Pre-Expt.BY01
-0-
WildHigh Low
BY02
BY04
BY03
BY02BY03 BY04
BY02BY03
BY04
Minijack rates of wild fish are approx. 1/10-1/20th that of
hatchery fish
Post-Expt.BY05
Post-Expt.BY05
1015202530354045505560
% Minijacks at Release
(among males)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
% Minijacks at Prosser Dam (among males)
R2
= 0.43P = 0.08
BY 2003 LowBY 2003 HighBY 2002 Low BY 2002 HighBY 2001 Pre-Growth Expt.
BY 2004 HighBY 2004 LowBY 2005 Post-Growth Expt.
There is a positive (but not significant) relationship between minijacks released and minijacks captured at Prosser Dam
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
% Females atProsser Dam
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
BY 2003 LowBY 2003 HighBY 2002 Low BY 2002 HighBY 2001 Conventional
% Minijacks at Release
R 2
= 0.67p < 0.0001
BY 2004 HighBY 2004 LowBY 2005 Conventional
Higher minijack rates at time of release correlate with gender ratios skewed in favor of females during smolt migration
How unique is this issue to Yakima Spring Chinook?
Winthrop Hatchery
-2.5-2.25
-2-1.75
-1.5-1.25
-1-.75
-.5-.25
0
Log
GSI
-1.5 -1 -.5 0 .5 1 1.5Log 11-KT
-2.25
-2
-1.75
-1.5
-1.25
-1
-.75
-.5
-.25
0
Log
GSI
-2 -1.5 -1 -.5 0 .5 1 1.5Log 11-KT
-2.25
-2
-1.75
-1.5
-1.25
-1
-.75
-.5
-.25
0
Log
GSI
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -.5 0 .5 1 1.5Log 11-KT
-2.5-2.25
-2-1.75
-1.5-1.25
-1-.75
-.5-.25
0
Log
GSI
-2 -1.5 -1 -.5 0 .5 1 1.5Log 11-KT
45% age-2Precocious males
Yakima Hatchery (BY’01) Leavenworth Hatchery
Entiat Hatchery
Precociousparr
Precociousparr
BY 03 13%BY 04 8%BY 05 11%
BY 03 23%BY 04 28%BY 05 35%
BY 03 15%BY 04 14%BY 05 33%
18g = 25/#
24g = 19/#22g = 22/#
19g = 24/#
Cle Elum Hatchery Staff
Ray Brunson, Joy Evered, Sonia Mumford, Chris Paterson-USFWS Pathology Lab, Olympia, WA.
Todd Pearsons and staff-WDFW
Bill Bosch-Yakama Nation
Doug Neeley-Instats consulting
Leroy Senator and staff-Yakama Nation, Chandler Smolt by-pass facility, Prosser Dam,
Steve Croci, Dan Davies, Al Jensen, Chris Pasley, Craig Eaton, Jason Reeves -Leavenworth Hatchery Complex Facilities
Debbie Docherty-BPA contract #200203100
NOAA Biop funding
Acknowledgments (most important slide)
Body
Weigh
t (gr
ams)
2007 2008J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J J A S O N
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
EarlyPond date4 Jan.
LaterPond date6 Feb.
Early Pond /High Growth
Late Pond / High Growth
Early Pond /Low Growth
Late Pond /Low Growth
CriticalPeriod
Shifting ponding date of fryCriticalPeriod
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
NOAA hatcherySeattle
Weigh
t (g
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Early Pond /High Growth
Late Pond / High Growth
Early Pond /Low Growth
Late Pond /Low Growth
J F M A M J J A S
Early Later Current Cle Elum pond date
Prec.Parr
Mini-Jack
32% 40% 72%72%
Tot.
22% 25% 52%52%
17% 31% 48%48%
13% 22% 35%
Egg incubation temperature significantly influences life-history composition
Early/High-MJ sires 33% 47% 80%80%