Upload
vankiet
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Wardell Armstrong2 The Avenue, Leigh, Greater Manchester, WN7 1ES, United KingdomTelephone: +44 (0)1942 260101 Facsimile: +44 (0)1942 261754 www.wardell-armstrong.com
Wardell Armstrong is the trading name of Wardell Armstrong LLP, Registered in England No. OC307138.
Registered office: Sir Henry Doulton House, Forge Lane, Etruria, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 5BD, United Kingdom
UK Offices: Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Cardiff, Carlisle, Edinburgh, Greater Manchester, London, Newcastle upon Tyne,Penryn, Sheffield, Truro, West Bromwich. International Offices: Almaty, Moscow
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGEENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIESLAND AND PROPERTY
MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSINGMINERAL ESTATES AND QUARRYING
WASTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
DATE ISSUED FEBRUARY 2018JOB NUMBER: BM11200REPORT NUMBER: 010
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTS LTD
SCHOOL LANE, EXHALL
DRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT
FEBRUARY 2018
PREPARED BY:
T Dalton Environmental Scientist
CHECKED BY:
R Calvert Principal Acoustic Consultant (MIOA)
APPROVED BY:
M Dawson Technical Director (MIOA)
This report has been prepared by Wardell Armstrong LLP with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, within the terms of the Contractwith the Client. The report is confidential to the Client and Wardell Armstrong LLP accept no responsibility of whatever nature to third
parties to whom this report may be made known.
No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of Wardell Armstrong LLP.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLNOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
CONTENTS1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................12 ASSESSMENT METHODOLODGY .........................................................................................2
3 NOISE SURVEYS.................................................................................................................10
4 SITE NOISE RISK ASSESSMENT ..........................................................................................155 ACOUSTIC DESIGN STATEMENT........................................................................................17
6 BS4142 INDUSTRIAL NOISE ASSESSMENT ........................................................................26
7 CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................................................33
APPENDICESAppendix A Noise Monitoring Results
DRAWINGS TITLE27290-9302 Concept Masterplan
BM11200-023 Noise Monitoring LocationsBM11200-024 Noise Contour Plan Daytime Levels
BM11200-025 Noise Contour Plan Night-time Levels
BM11200-026 Noise Contour Plan Night-time Max LevelsBM11200-027 Noise Contour Plan Daytime Levels with Theoretical Layout
BM11200-028 Noise Contour Plan Daytime Levels Facades
BM11200-029 Noise Contour Plan Night-time Levels FacadesBM11200-030 Noise Contour Plan Night-time Max Levels Facades
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 1
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1.1 Wardell Armstrong LLP (WA) have been instructed by Heyford Developments Ltd toundertake a noise assessment for a proposed residential development on 5.62 ha of
land off School Lane, Exhall, hereafter referred to as the ‘Site’.
1.1.2 The proposed development Site currently comprises open agricultural land. The Siteis bordered to the north by School Lane, with allotments beyond. To the east, the Site
is bordered by the newly constructed commercial premises of Red Kangaroo
Trampoline Park (RKTP) which is at commissioning stage and agricultural land, withCoventry Road and further existing industrial/commercial premises beyond. To the
south and south west, the Site is bordered by the M6 motorway and the slip road from
the A444 onto the M6, which are elevated above the surrounding ground levels. Tothe north west, the Site is bordered by open land with existing residential dwellings
and the A444 roundabout beyond.
1.1.3 The client has produced a concept masterplan (dwg. no. 27290-9032) showing the
developable area of the Site. This noise report has been prepared in support of theoutline planning application, and assesses the results of a noise survey carried out in
accordance with current guidance and includes recommendations for noise mitigation
as appropriate.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 2
2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLODGY
2.1 Scope of Works
2.1.1 The scope of the noise assessment includes consideration of noise at sensitive areas
of the proposed development, i.e. proposed residential areas, specifically in terms of
the potential impact of existing transportation noise and any other noise sources, andis in line with current guidance.
2.2 Noise Survey
2.2.1 As part of this assessment, WA have carried out attended and unattended noisesurveys to assess the current noise levels at proposed and existing receptor locations.
2.2.2 The potential sources of noise are road traffic on School Lane, the M6 motorway, and
to a lesser extent the remainder of the local road network. In addition, future noisefrom the adjacent RKTP commercial premises, which were in the final stages of
construction during the noise survey, will also need to be considered. The noise survey
is discussed in greater detail in Section 3 of this report.
2.3 Assessment Methodology
2.3.1 The noise assessment takes into account current guidance including the following:
National Planning Policy Framework, 2012;
Noise Policy Statement for England, 2010;
Planning Practice Guidance - Noise, 2014 (PPG);
The World Health Organisation Guidelines for Community Noise 1999 (WHO);
British Standard 8233: 2014 Guidance on Sound Insulation and noise reduction forbuildings (BS8233);
Pro:PG Planning & Noise: Professional Practice Guidance on Planning and Noise(2017);
British Standard 4142:2014 Methods for rating and assessing industrial andcommercial sound (BS4142), should industrial noise be dominant at any part of
the site; and,
Department of Transport’s memorandum, “Calculation of Road Traffic Noise”(CRTN), 1998.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 3
National Planning Policy Framework
2.3.2 In March 2012 the ‘National Planning Policy Framework’ (NPPF) was introduced as thecurrent planning policy guidance within England. Paragraph 123 of the NPPF states:
‘Planning policies and decisions should aim to:
avoid noise from giving rise to significant adverse impacts on health andquality of life as a result of new development;
mitigate and reduce to a minimum other adverse impacts on health andquality of life arising from noise from new development, including throughthe use of conditions;
recognise that development will often create some noise and existingbusinesses wanting to develop in continuance of their business should nothave unreasonable restrictions put on them because of changes in nearbyland uses since they were established; and
identify and protect areas of tranquillity which have remained relativelyundisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenityvalue for this reason.’
2.3.3 With regard to ‘adverse impacts’ the NPPF refers to the ‘Noise Policy Statement for
England’ (NPSE), which defines three categories, as follows:
‘NOEL – No Observed Effect Level
This is the level below which no effect can be detected. In simple terms,below this level, there is no detectable effect on health and quality of lifedue to the noise.
LOAEL – Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level
This is the level above which adverse effects on health and quality of lifecan be detected.
SOAEL – Significant Observed Adverse Effect Level
This is the level above which significant adverse effects on health andquality of life occur’.
2.3.4 The first aim of the NPSE states that significant adverse effects on health and quality
of life should be avoided. The second aim refers to the situation where the impact lies
somewhere between LOAEL and SOAEL, and it requires that all reasonable steps are
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 4
taken to mitigate and minimise the adverse effects of noise. However, this does not
mean that such adverse effects cannot occur.
2.3.5 The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) provides further detail about how the effect
levels can be recognised. Above the NOEL, noise becomes noticeable; however, it has
no adverse effect as it does not cause any change in behaviour or attitude. Once noisecrosses the LOAEL threshold it begins to have an adverse effect and consideration
needs to be given to mitigating and minimising those effects, taking account of the
economic and social benefits being derived from the activity causing the noise.Increasing noise exposure further might cause the SOAEL threshold to be crossed. If
the exposure is above this level the planning process should be used to avoid the effect
occurring by use of appropriate mitigation such as by altering the design and layout.Such decisions must be made taking account of the economic and social benefit of the
activity causing the noise, but it is undesirable for such exposure to be caused. At the
highest extreme the situation should be prevented from occurring regardless of the
benefits which might arise. Table 1 summarises the noise exposure hierarchy.
Table 1 National Planning Practice Guidance noise exposure hierarchyPerception Examples of Outcomes Increasing Effect
LevelAction
Not noticeable No Effect No ObservedEffect
No specificmeasuresrequired
Noticeable andnot intrusive
Noise can be heard, but does not cause anychange in behaviour or attitude. Can slightlyaffect the acoustic character of the area butnot such that there is a perceived change inthe quality of life.
No Observedadverse Effect
No specificmeasuresrequired
Lowest Observed Adverse Effect LevelNoticeable and
intrusiveNoise can be heard and causes small changesin behaviour and/or attitude, e.g. turning upvolume of television; speaking more loudly;where there is no alternative ventilation,having to close windows for some of the timebecause of the noise. Potential for somereported sleep disturbance. Affects theacoustic character of the area such thatthere is a perceived change in the quality oflife.
Observed AdverseEffect
Mitigateand reduce
to aminimum
Significant Observed Adverse Effect LevelNoticeable and
disruptiveThe noise causes a material change inbehaviour and/or attitude, e.g. avoidingcertain activities during periods of intrusion;where there is no alternative ventilation,having to keep windows closed most of thetime because of the noise. Potential forsleep disturbance resulting in difficulty in
SignificantObserved Adverse
Effect
Avoid
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 5
Table 1 National Planning Practice Guidance noise exposure hierarchyPerception Examples of Outcomes Increasing Effect
LevelAction
getting to sleep, premature awakening anddifficulty in getting back to sleep. Quality oflife diminished due to change in acousticcharacter of the area.
Noticeable andvery disruptive
Extensive and regular changes in behaviourand/or an inability to mitigate effect of noiseleading to psychological stress orphysiological effects, e.g. regular sleepdeprivation/awakening; loss of appetite,significant, medically definable harm, e.g.auditory and non-auditory.
UnacceptableAdverse Effect
Prevent
2.3.6 The Noise Policy Statement for England refers to the World Health Organisation
(WHO) when discussing noise impacts. The WHO Guidelines for Community Noise(1999) suggest guideline values for internal noise exposure which take into
consideration the identified health effects and are set, based on the lowest effect
levels for general populations. Guideline values for annoyance which relate toexternal noise exposure are set at 50 or 55 dB(A), representing day time levels below
which a majority of the adult population will be protected from becoming moderately
or seriously annoyed, respectively. The following guideline values are suggested byWHO:
35 dB LAeq (16 hour) during the day time in noise sensitive rooms;
30 dB LAeq (8 hour) during the night time in bedrooms;
45 dB LAf,Max during the night time in bedrooms;
50 dB LAeq (16 hour) to protect majority of population from becoming moderatelyannoyed; and
55 dBLAeq (16 hour) to protect majority of population from becoming seriouslyannoyed
2.3.7 British Standard 8233 “Guidance on sound insulation and noise reduction forbuildings” 2014 bases its advice on the WHO Guidelines. In addition, for internal noise
levels it states;
“Where development is considered necessary or desirable, despite externalnoise levels above WHO guidelines, the internal target levels may be relaxed byup to 5 dB and reasonable internal conditions still achieved.”
2.3.8 Furthermore, with regard to external noise, the Standard states;
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 6
“For traditional external areas that are used for amenity space such asgardens and patios, it is desirable that the external noise level does notexceed 50 dB LAeq. T with an upper guidance value of 55 dB LAeq,T which wouldbe acceptable in noisier environments. However, it is also recognised thatthese guideline values are not achievable in all circumstances wheredevelopment might be desirable. In higher noise areas, such as city centresor urban areas adjoining the strategic transport network, a compromisebetween elevated noise levels and other factors, such as the convenience ofliving in these locations or making efficient use of land resources to ensuredevelopment needs can be met, might be warranted. In such a situation,development should be designed to achieve the lowest practicable levels inthese external amenity spaces, but should not be prohibited”.
2.3.9 The PPG summarises the approach to be taken when assessing noise. It accepts that
noise can override other planning concerns, but states:
“Neither the Noise Policy Statement for England nor the National PlanningPolicy Framework (which reflects the Noise Policy Statement) expects noise tobe considered in isolation, separate from the economic, social and otherenvironmental dimensions of proposed development”.
ProPG: Planning & Noise Professional Practice Guidance on Planning & Noise
2.3.10 ProPG Planning and Noise provides professional practice guidance in relation to new
residential development exposed to noise from transport sources. It providespractitioners with a recommended approach to the management of noise within the
planning system in England.
2.3.11 The guidance reflects the Government’s overarching National Planning PolicyFramework, the Noise Policy Statement for England, and Planning Practice Guidance
(including PPG-Noise) and draws on other authoritative sources of guidance. It
provides advice for Local Planning Authorities and developers, and their professional
advisors, on achieving good acoustic design in and around new residentialdevelopments.
Guidance on Assessment of Road Traffic Noise
2.3.12 The Department of Transport’s memorandum, “Calculation of Road Traffic Noise”(CRTN), 1998 defines a shortened measurement procedure which is used to calculate
the LA10,18hour noise level from a measured 3 hour period. The method requires the
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 7
measurement of noise over 3 consecutive hours between 1000 and 1700 hours.
2.3.13 From the measured 3-hour period, the arithmetic average of the three LA10,1Hour
measurements is taken. The LA10,18Hour noise level is then determined using the
following calculation method;
LA10,18Hour = LA10,3hour - 1
2.3.14 The document “Converting the UK traffic noise index LA10,18h to EU noise indices fornoise mapping” by P G Abbott and P M Nelson (The TRL Method) provides a calculation
method to convert the calculated LA10,18Hour into a daytime LAeq as described below.
Lday = 0.95 x LA10,18hour + 1.44dB
British Standard 4142:2014 (BS4142), Method for rating and assessing industrial andcommercial sound:
2.3.15 BS4142 is used to rate and assess sound of an industrial and/or commercial nature
including:
sound from industrial and manufacturing processes;
sound from fixed installations which comprise mechanical and electrical plant andequipment;
sound from the loading and unloading of goods and materials at industrial and/orcommercial premises; and
sound from mobile plant and vehicles that is an intrinsic part of the overall soundemanating from premises or processes, such as that from forklift trucks, or that
from train or ship movements on or around an industrial and/or commercial site.
2.3.16 The standard is applicable to the determination of the following levels at outdoor
locations:
rating levels for sources of sound of an industrial and/or commercial nature; and
ambient, background and residual sound levels, for the purposes of:
1) Investigating complaints;
2) Assessing sound from proposed, new, modified or additional source(s) of sound of
an industrial and/or commercial nature; and
3) Assessing sound at proposed new dwellings or premises used for residentialpurposes.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 8
2.3.17 The purpose of the BS4142 assessment procedure is to assess the significance of
sound of an industrial and/or commercial nature.
2.3.18 BS4142 refers to noise from the industrial source as the ‘specific noise’ and this is the
term used in this report to refer to noise which is predicted to occur due to activities
associated with RKTP premises. The ‘specific noise’ levels, of the existing industrialpremises that have been measured are detailed in Section 4 of this report.
2.3.19 BS4142 assesses the significance of impacts by comparing the specific noise level to
the background noise level (LA90). Section 4 provides details of the background noisesurvey undertaken.
2.3.20 Certain acoustic features can increase the significance of impacts over that expected
from a simple comparison between the specific noise level and the background noiselevel. In particular, BS4142 identifies that the absolute level of sound, the character,
and the residual sound and the sensitivity of receptor should all be taken into
consideration. BS4142 includes allowances for a rating penalty to be added if it is
found that the specific noise source contains a tone, impulse and/or othercharacteristic, or is expected to be present. The specific noise level along with any
applicable correction is referred to as the ‘rating level’.
2.3.21 The greater the increase between the rating level over the background noise level, thegreater the magnitude of the impact. The assessment criteria given by BS4142 are as
follows:
A difference of around +10dB or more is likely to be an indication of a significantadverse impact, depending on the context.
A difference of around +5dB is likely to be an indication of an adverse impact,depending on the context.
The lower the rating level is relative to the measured background sound level, theless likely it is that the specific sound source will have an adverse impact or a
significant adverse impact. Where the rating level does not exceed the background
sound level, this is an indication of the specific sound source having a low impact,depending on the context.
2.3.22 During the daytime, BS4142 requires that noise levels are assessed over 1-hour
periods. However, during the night-time, noise levels are required to be assessed over15-minute periods.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 9
2.3.23 Where the initial estimate of the impact needs to be modified due to context, BS4142
states that all pertinent factors should be taken into consideration, including:
The absolute level of sound;
The character and level of the residual sound compared to the character and levelof the specific sound; and
The sensitivity of the receptor and whether dwellings or other premises used forresidential purposes will already incorporate design measures that secure good
internal and/or outdoor acoustic conditions.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 10
3 NOISE SURVEYS
3.1.1 Noise surveys were undertaken on two separate occasions at six monitoring locations.
3.1.2 The monitoring locations are as follows, and are shown on Drawing Number
BM11200-023:
Monitoring Location 1 (ML1): In the western part of the Site, adjacent to the accessslip road onto the M6 south bound, at a height of 1.5m. This location was chosento measure noise from the M6 slip road which runs to the south of the proposed
development;
Monitoring Location 2 (ML2): In the adjacent land, south east of the Site, near tothe M6 motorway, at a height of 4.0m, as the ground level is lower in comparisonto the development Site. This location was chosen to measure noise from the M6;
Monitoring Location 3 (ML3): In the northern part of the Site, approximately 5mfrom School Lane, at a height of 1.5m. This location was chosen to be
representative of proposed sensitive receptors in the northern part of the Site;
Monitoring Location 4 (ML4): In the north eastern part of the Site, approximately1m from the Site boundary at a height of 1.5m. This location was chosen tomeasure external plant noise from the RKTP premises;
Monitoring Location 5 (ML5): In the northern eastern part of the Site,approximately 1m from the Site boundary and 7m north of ML4, at a height of
1.5m. This location was chosen to measure external plant noise from the RKTPpremises; and,
Monitoring Location 6 (ML6): In the north western part of the Site, approximately80m from School Lane, at a height of 1.5m. This location was chosen to measure
background noise levels in the absence of any commercial or industrial noise.
3.1.3 WA carried out a survey to assess existing ambient and background noise levels at the
proposed development Site between the 14th and 20th December 2017 and between
the 1st and 2nd of February 2018.
3.1.4 Table 2 shows the periods of unattended and attended monitoring at each location.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 11
Table 2: Monitoring Locations and Periods of Monitoring
MonitoringLocation
StartDate and Time
FinishDate and Time
Attended or Unattended
114/12/2017
22:00
20/12/2017
17:58Unattended with audio recording
214/12/2017
21:38
17/12/2017
04:31Unattended
302/02/2018
04:30
02/02/2018
13:02Attended
402/02/2018
04:22
02/02/2018
04:44Attended
502/02/2018
04:09
02/02/2018
04:19Attended
6
01/02/2018
20:10
02/02/2018
09:51
02/02/2018
04:26
02/02/2018
11:06
Part-attended with audio recording
3.1.5 ML1, ML2 and ML3 will be used to assess road traffic noise impact on the proposedSite.
3.1.6 ML4, ML5 and ML6 will be used to assess industrial noise in section 6 of this report.
3.1.7 The noise measurements were made using Type 1, integrating sound level meters.The meters were mounted on tripods, 1.5m above the ground at 5 monitoring
locations, and 4.0m above the ground at 1 monitoring location. Each monitoring
location was more than 3.5 metres from any other reflecting surfaces. The sound level
meters were calibrated to a reference level of 94dB at 1kHz both before, and oncompletion of, the noise survey. No drift in the calibration during the survey was
noted.
3.1.8 On the 14th – 20th December 2017 the weather conditions were as follows;
Approximate average +6˚C;
Damp ground; and,
Low winds.
3.1.9 On the 1st February 2018 the weather conditions were as follows;
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 12
Temperature approximately +4-+8˚C;
Damp ground;
80% cloud cover; and,
4-5 m/s wind.
3.1.10 On the 2nd February 2018 the weather conditions were as follows;
Temperature approximately +3-+10˚C;
Damp ground;
Clear sky; and,
4-5m/s wind.
3.1.11 For the purpose of this assessment daytime hours are taken to be 0700 to 2300 hoursand night-time hours to be 2300 to 0700 hours.
3.1.12 A-weighted1 Leqs2 were measured in accordance with the requirements of BS8233. The
maximum and minimum sound pressure levels, A-weighted L90s3 and A-weighted L10s4
were also measured to provide additional information. The measured noise levels are
set out in full in Appendix A.
3.1.13 Attended noise monitoring and a review of audio recording allows observations and
detailed notes to be made of the significant noise sources which contribute to each ofthe measured levels. The observations identified the significant noise sources at the
Site to be as follows:
Road Traffic: Noise from road traffic from the M6 and M6 southbound access slip roadto the south was audible at every monitoring location during the daytime and night-
time periods. Road traffic noise from School Lane was dominant in the northern part
of the Site during the daytime and night-time periods.
Industrial Noise: Noise from construction activities associated with the final stages of
the development of the RKTP during daytime and night-time periods was audible.
1 A’ Weighting An electronic filter in a sound level meter which mimics the human ear’s response to
sounds at different frequencies under defined conditions2 Leqs Equivalent continuous noise level; the steady sound pressure which contains an equivalent
quantity of sound energy as the time-varying sound pressure levels.3 L90 The noise level which is exceeded for 90% of the measurement period.4 L10 The noise level which is exceeded for 10% of the measurement period.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 13
However, investigations and consultation with a site manager demonstrated that the
activities on the site currently, are not representative of typical operations at the RKTPonce it is open. No other industrial noise sources were audible.
Aircraft: Noise from low level aircraft was audible at all monitoring locations during
the daytime and night-time periods.Other: Birdsong was audible at all locations during the daytime and night-time
periods.
3.2 Existing Noise Levels
3.2.1 The measured noise levels at ML1, ML2 and ML3 have been divided into daytime
(0700-2300 hours), and night-time (2300-0700 hours), and where applicable, have
been arithmetically averaged to give a single level for each location.
3.2.2 The results for each of the monitoring locations are presented in Table 3.
Table 3: Average Daytime and Night-time Noise Levels (Figures in dB LAeq)
TimeMonitoringLocation
Average Measured Noise Level
0700-2300
2300-07001
73
70
0700-2300
2300-07002
69
65
0700-2300
2300-07003
68
67
3.2.3 ML1 and ML2 were selected to represent road traffic noise from the M6 and the datahas been used to create a noise model of the potential impact of noise from the M6
and M6 and southbound access slip road, across the proposed development site.
3.2.4 ML3 has been chosen to represent road traffic noise from School Lane.
3.2.5 As detailed in Section 2.3 of this report, CRTN and TRL define a method to calculate
LA10,16Hour from three consecutive one hour measurements, taken between 1000 and
1700 hours. The assessment is shown for ML3 in Table 4.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 14
Table 4: Measured Noise Levels (Figures in dB(A))
TimeML3
Measured LA10
Hour 1 LA10, 1hour - 10:00-11:00 71
Hour 2 LA10, 1hour - 11:00-12:00 71
Hour 3 LA10, 1hour- 12:00-13:00 71
Average LA10,3hour 71
LA10,18hour 70
LAeq,16hour Daytime (Calculated in
accordance with TRL)68
3.2.6 Noise levels have been measured and calculated for proposed receptors closest to
School Lane. The LAeq,16Hour noise level of 68dB calculated, in accordance with CRTN &TRL, is shown in Table 4. It is identical to the measured noise level shown in Table 3.
3.2.7 The maximum noise levels measured during the night-time period of the survey, at
ML1, ML2 and ML3 are detailed in Table 5.
Table 5: Summary of the Maximum Night-time Noise Levels (Figures in dB LAmax)
Monitoring Location Maximum Measured Noise Levels
1 80
2 73
3 80
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 15
4 SITE NOISE RISK ASSESSMENT
4.1 Introduction
4.1.1 In accordance with ProPG (2017), a Site Noise Risk Assessment (SNRA) has been
carried out. The SNRA assesses the initial risk of noise from transportation sources to
have an adverse impact on a proposed development based on the overall measuredlevels with no mitigation in place.
4.1.2 The results of noise measurements carried out during the daytime and night-time
periods are presented in Table 6, and have been compared to the informationprovided on Figure 1 of ProPG 2017.
4.1.3 Table 6 indicates that during the daytime and night-time periods, proposed receptorslocated in the southern parts of the development, near to the M6 slip road would be
at a high risk of experiencing an adverse noise impact due to road traffic.
4.1.4 Table 6 also indicates that during the night time, proposed receptors located closest
to the M6 motorway and School Lane would be at a high risk of experiencing anadverse noise impact due to road traffic.
4.1.5 ProPG states that;
‘High noise levels indicate that there is an increased risk that the developmentmay be refused on noise grounds. This risk may be reduced by following a goodacoustic design process that is demonstrated as detailed in a detailedADS(Acoustic Design Statement). Applicants are strongly advised to seek expert
Table 6: Stage 1 Risk Assessment of Noise Levels.
MonitoringLocation
Residential PropertyLocation
DaytimeNoise Level(Figures in
dB LAeq)
Risk ofAdverseEffect
(ProPG)
Night-timeNoise Level(Figures in dB
LAeq)
Risk ofAdverseEffect
(ProPG)
1
Residential properties in the
southern part of the Site
closest to the M6 slip road.73 High 70 High
2
Residential properties in the
southern part of the Site
closest to the M6.69 Medium 65 High
3
Residential properties in the
northern parts of the Site
closest to School Lane.68 Medium 67 High
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 16
advice.’
4.1.6 Table 6 indicates that during the daytime, proposed receptors located closest to theM6 motorway and School Lane would be at Medium risk of experiencing an adverse
noise impact due to road traffic.
4.1.7 ProPG states that;
‘As noise levels increase, the site is likely to be less suitable from a noiseperspective and any subsequent application may be refused unless a goodacoustic design process is followed and is demonstrated in an ADS (AcousticDesign Statement) which confirms how the adverse impacts of noise will bemitigated and minimised and which clearly demonstrated that a significantadverse noise impact will be avoided in the finished development.’
4.1.8 The Site Noise Risk Assessment shows that local noise mitigation and good acoustic
design will be required to ensure that the potential noise impact is minimised and
guideline internal and external guide line noise levels are achieved.
4.1.9 In accordance with ProPG 2017, a Stage 2 full noise assessment, which includes anacoustic design statement, is required to ensure future residents are protected and
good acoustic design has been implemented.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 17
5 ACOUSTIC DESIGN STATEMENT
5.1 Introduction
5.1.1 The results of the ProPG Stage 1: Initial Site Noise Risk Assessment show that receptors
in the southern and northern parts of the proposed development are likely to be at
medium to high risk of experiencing an adverse noise impact due to road traffic, withno mitigation in place.
5.1.2 A layout has been produced by the client showing the developable area of the Site
(drawing number: 27920-9302). This layout has been used in this assessment.
5.1.3 SoundPLAN noise modelling software has been used to calculate the noise levels in
the proposed developable areas in the southern part of the Site closest to the M6 and
slip roads to determine any mitigation measures.
5.1.4 The noise modelling has been checked for accuracy against the measured noise levels.
This has been carried out by co-locating a receptor location into the model with
monitoring locations. The calibration results of the model are shown against the
measured levels at ML1 and ML2, shown in Table 7.
Table 7: Comparison of the Modelled and Monitored Noise Levels (Figures in dB)
MonitoringLocation
AverageDaytimeMonitored
NoiseLevel (LAeq)
DaytimeModelledNoise
Level(LAeq)
Differencein NoiseLevel
during theDaytime
AverageNighttimeMonitored
Noise Level(LAeq)
NighttimeModelledNoise
Level (LAeq)
Difference inNoise Levelduring the
Nighttime
1 73 74.5 +1.5 70 70.6 +0.6
2 69 69.3 +0.3 65 65.9 +0.9
5.1.5 Predictions have been made of noise levels at the developable area in the eastern part
of the Site closest to the M6.5.1.6 ML1 and ML2 were selected to represent road traffic noise from the M6 and the data
has been used to create a noise model of the potential impact of noise from the M6
and M6 and southbound access slip road, across the proposed development Site.
5.1.7 ML3 has been chosen to represent road traffic noise from School Lane. The noise data
from measurements at ML3 has not been used in the M6 noise model; however, the
data has been used to assess the potential impact of road traffic noise from School
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 18
Lane in the northern part of the Site.
5.2 WHO Assessment of Daytime Noise Levels in Outdoor Living Areas
5.2.1 The measured daytime noise levels, as detailed in Table 3, have been used to
determine the noise levels likely in outdoor living areas of properties in the vicinity of
road traffic noise during the daytime period.
5.2.2 The measured noise levels that are likely to impact the proposed development in the
northern and southern parts of the Site, together with the level of attenuation
required to achieve the upper guideline value of 55dB LAeq recommended in BS8233and the WHO Guidelines, during the daytime, in outdoor living areas, are summarised
in Table 8.
5.2.3 The noise levels shown in drawing BM11200-024 and Table 8 exceeds the guideline
noise level during the daytime in outdoor living areas. Therefore, mitigation measureswill be required in this part of the development to achieve the recommended
guideline noise level in outdoor living areas.
5.3 Assessment of Daytime Noise Levels in Living Rooms and Bedrooms
5.3.1 The daytime noise levels in noise sensitive rooms of the proposed dwellings have been
assessed in accordance with WHO and BS8233 guideline noise levels for living room
and bedroom areas. The guideline daytime noise level within living rooms andbedrooms is 35 dB LAeq (16hr).
5.3.2 The measured daytime noise levels have been used to determine the noise levels likely
at the facades of the properties in the vicinity of the traffic noise sources, during thedaytime period.
Table 8: Average Daytime Noise Levels in Outdoor Living areas
Residential Property LocationNoise Level(Figures in dB LAeq)
Level ofAttenuation Needed to Achieve
55dB LAeq in Outdoor Living Areas
Residential development area in the
eastern parts of the Site closest to M6
and slip road, modelled using data
from ML1+ ML2
69* 14
Residential properties in the
Northern parts of the Site closest to
School Lane i.e. ML3
68 13
*Estimated noise level at the southern edge of the developable area using noise modelling.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 19
5.3.3 Before internal noise levels can be calculated 3dB(A) must be added to the free-field
measured and predicted levels to allow for the reflection of noise from the proposedhousing facades when the buildings are in place.
5.3.4 The predicted noise levels at the noise modelled facades in the southern part of the
developable area, and the calculated noise levels at the façades of the proposeddwellings in the northern part of the Site, together with the level of attenuation
required to achieve 35dB LAeq (16hr) in living rooms and bedrooms is summarised in
Table 9.
Table 9: Façade Noise Level at Properties in the Vicinity of the Monitoring Locations and Level ofAttenuation Required to Achieve the Internal Daytime Noise Guidance Level (Figures in dB(A))Residential Property Location Noise Level at the
Façade of theProperty dB(LAeq)
Level of Attenuation Neededto Achieve Guidance NoiseLevels in Living Rooms andBedrooms dB(A)
Residential development area in thesouthern parts of the Site closest to M6and slip road, modelled using data fromML1+ ML2
72* 37
Residential properties in the northernparts of the Site closest to School Lane i.e.ML3
71 36
*Estimated noise level at the southern edge of the developable area using noise modelling.
5.3.5 The noise levels shown in drawing BM11200-024 and Table 9 indicate that the noise
levels in noise sensitive rooms in dwellings in the northern and eastern parts of the
Site, closest to School Lane, M6 and M6 slip road, are likely to exceed noise guidancelevels with windows open during daytime periods. These dwellings will require good
acoustic design to minimise the impact of road traffic noise. This is discussed in section
5.5 of this report.
5.3.6 The facades of the buildings further into the Site will be protected by the buildings
themselves and/or be screened by other buildings. It is considered that the noise
levels at these facades, and therefore the level of attenuation the facades would needto provide to achieve recommended guideline noise values, will be less than those
detailed in Table 9.
5.4 Assessment of Night-time Noise Levels in Bedrooms
5.4.1 The guideline noise level within bedroom areas at night-time is 30dB LAeq (8hr). Inaddition, individual noise events should not normally exceed 45dB LAfmax.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 20
5.4.2 The measured night time noise levels have been used to determine the noise levels
likely at the facades of the properties in the vicinity of the proposed noise sensitiveparts of the development, during the night time period.
5.4.3 Before internal noise levels can be calculated 3dB(A) must be added to the free-field
measured and predicted levels to allow for the reflection of noise from the proposedhousing facades when the buildings are in place.
5.4.4 The predicted noise levels at the noise modelled facades in the southern part of the
developable area, and the calculated noise levels in the northern part of the Site atthe façades of the dwellings, together with the level of attenuation required to achieve
30dB LAeq and 45dB LAmax in the bedrooms, are summarised in Table 10.
Table 10: Façade Noise Level at Properties in the Vicinity of the Monitoring Locations and Level ofAttenuation Required to Achieve the Internal Night-time Guidance Noise Levels (Figures in dB(A))Residential Property Location Noise Level at the
Façade of theProperty (dB LAeq)
MaximumNoise Level atthe Façade ofthe Property(dB LAmax)
Level ofAttenuationNeeded to Achievethe Noise GuidanceLevels in Bedrooms(dB(A))
Residential development area in thesouthern parts of the Site closest toM6 and slip road, modelled using datafrom ML1+ ML2
69* 70* 39
Residential properties in the northernparts of the Site closest to School Lanei.e. ML3
70 83 40
*Estimated noise level at the southern edge of the developable area using noise modelling.
5.4.5 The noise levels shown in drawing BM11200-025/026 and Table 10 show that the
noise levels in noise sensitive rooms in dwellings in the northern part of the Site,closest to School Lane, M6 and M6 slip road are likely to exceed noise guidance levels
with windows open during night-time periods. These dwellings will require good
acoustic design to minimise the impact of road traffic noise. This is discussed in section
5.5 of this report.
5.4.6 The facades of the properties further into the Site will be protected by the buildings
themselves and/or be screened by other buildings. It is considered that the noise
levels at these facades, and therefore the level of attenuation the facades would needto provide to achieve the 30dB LAeq and 45dB LAf,max in the bedrooms, will be less than
those detailed in Table 10.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 21
5.5 Acoustic Design Process
5.5.1 Noise from M6 and associated slip road has been modelled using Soundplan 8 to showthe noise impact at proposed receptors in the southern part of the Site.
5.5.2 For the purpose of this assessment, WA has assumed locations and orientations of
dwellings based on our experience of typical homing schemes. The proposed buildingsrepresent a theoretical layout for illustrative purposes only. The theoretical layout
includes a standoff of approximately 85m from the southern boundary of the
proposed development Site, also shown in the plan provided (dwg. no. 27290-9302).
5.5.3 The theoretical layout has been used to demonstrate how the orientation of dwellings
can attenuate noise from the M6 and M6 slip road, to protect external garden areas
and dwellings further into the Site by screening noise in the southern part of the Site.
Noise Attenuation Scheme
Daytime Noise Levels in Outdoor Living Areas
5.5.4 Noise contour Drawing BM11200-027 shows the predicted external daytime noise
levels at the proposed developable area in the southern part of the Site. This includes2m high close boarded fencing located around the boundaries of all gardens, to
provide noise mitigation for outdoor living areas. The results indicate that noise levels
in proposed outdoor living areas will achieve the upper guideline level of 55dB LAeq,within the majority of gardens. However, some gardens contain small areas which
exceed 55dB LAeq.
5.5.5 Predicted noise levels in the gardens of a small number of dwelling, show anexceedance of the 55dB LAeq upper guideline value, range between 55dB(A) and
58dB(A). This indicates that noise levels in certain areas of the garden could be up to
3dB above the recommended noise level for outdoor living areas specified in BS8233.However, it is generally accepted that 3dB is the minimum change in noise level which
is just perceptible to humans. Therefore, the difference between 55dB(A) and 58dB(A)
is considered to be only just noticeable.
5.5.6 Furthermore, Drawing BM11200-027 shows that predicted noise levels in somegardens still provide an area where noise levels areas which achieve the upper
guideline value of 55dB LAeq, closest to the rear façade of houses, which are most likely
to be the area used as a patio or outdoor seating area. Therefore, elevated noise levelselsewhere in these gardens are not considered to significantly affect the amenity of
residents.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 22
5.5.7 The advice given in BS8233 should be a consideration when determining the
significance of noise impact in gardens associated with Plots where exceedances ofthe ‘upper guideline value’ of 55dB LAeq, 16hour, as recommended by BS8233.
5.5.8 Given the close proximity of this Site to the major transport infrastructure, any
exceedances at these plots could be considered less significant in the planningbalance.
5.5.9 It is considered that the noise levels which exceed the recommended noise levels in
areas of some gardens should be considered in the context of BS8233 guidance whenconsidering the feasibility of the proposed development Site.
5.5.10 The measured noise levels, as detailed in Table 8 and Section 5.2 of this report,indicate that mitigation measures will be required to ensure that outdoor living areasin the northern parts of the Site achieve the recommended outdoor noise guidelinevalue of 55dB LAeq.
5.5.11 To mitigate traffic noise levels in outdoor living areas located closest to, and with a
direct line of sight of School Lane, gardens could be located on the screened sides of
dwellings, i.e. not located with a direct line of sight to the road.
5.5.12 Alternatively, if gardens are to be located near to, and with a direct line of sight of,School Lane, a 15m standoff combined with standard close boarded fencing of 1.8m
in height between gardens and School Lane should be sufficient to protect external
living areas. However, it should be noted that the final height and location of noisebarriers will depend upon the final layout of the Site.
Glazing Requirements for Daytime Living Rooms and Bedrooms
5.5.13 Noise contour Drawing BM11200-028 shows the predicted daytime noise levels atfaçades of the dwellings located closest to the M6 and M6 slip road of the theoretical
layout, in the southern part of the Site.
5.5.14 When assessing daytime noise levels in noise sensitive rooms, the noise attenuationprovided by the overall building facade should be considered. To mitigate noise levels,
the composition of the building facade can be designed to provide the level of
attenuation required. Glazing is generally the building element that attenuates noise
the least, so the proportion of glazing in a building facade is an importantconsideration when assessing overall noise attenuation.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 23
5.5.15 In the absence of design details for the building facades, it has been assumed that the
glazing to noise sensitive rooms would comprise about 25% of the facade area. Tocalculate the overall attenuation provided by this percentage of glazing in a brick or
block facade, a non-uniform partition calculation can be used.
5.5.16 The calculation combines the different degrees of attenuation of the wall element andthe window element. A facade element comprising a standard modern solid brick or
block work construction, will typically attenuate by 45-50dB (British Standard 8233:
“Sound insulation and noise reduction for buildings – Code of practice” 1999) whereasstandard double glazing will attenuate road traffic noise by 26-29dB(A) (BRE Digest
379 “Double glazing for heat and sound insulation”). The overall noise attenuation
provided by this combination is therefore, between 31.9dB(A) and 34.9dB(A).
5.5.17 The noise attenuation requirements for proposed noise sensitive living rooms and
bedrooms in the northern and southern parts of the Site nearest to School Lane, the
M6 and M6 slip road are summarised in Table 9 and shown in drawing BM11200-028.
The requirements indicate that enhanced thermal glazing would be required to ensurethat recommended internal noise levels are met within living room and bedroom
areas with windows closed, in northern and southern parts of the Site, closest to
School Lane, the M6 and M6 slip road.
5.5.18 However, with windows open, the attenuation provided by the façade will be
approximately 15dB(A). This would potentially allow the recommended internal noise
guideline levels to be exceeded in some living rooms and bedrooms in the northernand southern parts of the Site nearest to School Lane, the M6 and M6 slip road.
5.5.19 On occasion, this may be acceptable to a resident, but when quiet conditions are
required, the resident should be able to close the windows whilst maintainingadequate ventilation. Some form of alternative ventilation would therefore need to
be installed in some of the living rooms and bedrooms.
5.5.20 Alternatively, to meet the required noise levels, living rooms and bedrooms could be
located on the screened side of the proposed buildings, away from School Lane. A 10mstandoff would provide the required attenuation to ensure that recommended
internal noise levels can be met with standard thermal double glazing, with windows
closed, within living room and bedroom areas in northern parts of the Site, closest toSchool Lane.
5.5.21 Proposed facades further into the Site will be protected by the buildings themselves
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 24
and/or be screened by intervening buildings. These facades are likely to achieve 35dB
LAeq in living rooms and bedrooms which can be provided by standard thermal doubleglazing, even with windows open.
5.5.22 Glazing and ventilation requirements can be confirmed, on a plot by plot basis, at the
reserved matters stage.
Glazing Requirements for Night-time Bedrooms
5.5.23 Noise contour Drawings BM11200-029/030 shows the predicted night-time noise
levels at façades of the dwellings located closest to the M6 and M6 slip road of thetheoretical layout, based on the Concept Masterplan (dwg. no. 27920-9302) in the
southern part of the Site.
5.5.24 The noise attenuation requirements for proposed noise sensitive bedrooms in thenorthern and southern parts of the Site nearest to School Lane M6 and M6 slip road
are summarised in Table 10 and shown in drawing BM11200-029/030. The
requirements indicate that enhanced thermal double glazing should ensure that
recommended internal noise levels are met within bedrooms of dwellings in northernparts of the Site, closest to School Lane, M6 and M6 slip road with windows closed
during the night-time.
5.5.25 However, with windows open, the attenuation provided by the façade will beapproximately 15dB(A). This would potentially allow the recommended internal noise
guideline levels to be exceeded in some living rooms and bedrooms in the northern
and southern parts of the Site nearest to School Lane, M6 and M6 slip road.
5.5.26 Some form of acoustic ventilation would therefore need to be installed in bedrooms
located in the northern parts of the development Site. Alternatively, to meet the
required noise levels, bedrooms could be located on the screened side of theproposed buildings, away from the main source of noise.
5.5.27 A 15m standoff, combined with standard thermal double glazing, should ensure that
recommended internal noise levels are met within bedrooms of dwellings in northern
parts of the Site, closest to School Lane with windows closed during the night-time.
5.5.28 The facades of the dwellings further into the Site will be protected by the buildings
themselves and/or be screened by other buildings. It is considered that the noise
levels at these facades, and therefore the level of attenuation the facades would needto provide to achieve the required noise limits, will be less than those detailed in Table
10.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 25
5.5.29 Glazing requirements can be confirmed, on a plot by plot basis, at the reserved
matters stage.
5.6 Assessment of Other Relevant Issues
5.6.1 It is likely that internal and external noise guideline levels will be achieved across the
entire Site area with just local mitigation measures. Therefore, the proposeddevelopment is likely to comply with relevant national and local policy.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 26
6 BS4142 INDUSTRIAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
6.1.1 Onsite observations indicate that there are existing industrial noise sources in thevicinity of the proposed development Site. These include the premises of RKTP located
adjacent to the north eastern part of the proposed development Site.
6.1.2 A BS4142 assessment has been carried out to assess the potential noise impact fromindustrial/commercial sources at the proposed sensitive receptors. As the
industrial/commercial noise sources on the RKTP premises have been observed to
operated continuously for 24-hours, daytime, evening and night-time periods will beused in this assessment.
Selection of the Background Noise
6.1.3 Section 8 of BS4142 provides guidance on the selection of the background sound tobe used in the assessment. BS4142 states that the background sound levels used for
the assessment should be representative of the period being assessed (i.e. daytime or
night-time periods), and that there is no “single” background sound level.
6.1.4 Therefore, some assessment of the measured noise levels is required to select themost appropriate and representative background sound level. An assessment has
been carried out based upon the measured noise levels during daytime, evening and
night-time periods.
Analysis of Background Data
6.1.5 The background noise levels used in the BS4142 assessment are the LA90 levels
measured at ML6, which were measured in the absence of noise from anyindustrial/commercial sources. The daytime and evening noise levels have been
assessed over 1-hour reference periods, and night-time noise levels assessed over 15-
minute reference periods.
6.1.6 For the purpose of this assessment, the background noise level of 62dB LA90 measured
at ML6 (over the period 1000-1100 hours) on 1st February 2018 is considered to be
typical of the background noise level during the daytime period.
6.1.7 For the purpose of this assessment, the background noise level of 61dB LA90 measuredat ML6 (over the period 2100-2300 hours) on 1st February 2018 is considered to be
typical of the background noise level during the evening period.
6.1.8 For the purpose of this assessment, the background noise level of 57dB LA90 measuredat ML6 (over the period 0000-0400 hours) on 2nd February 2018 is considered to be
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 27
typical of the background noise level during the night time period.
6.1.9 Measurements were carried out during a representative period, and the results aretherefore considered robust.
Analysis of Existing Noise Sources
Red Kangaroo Trampoline Park
6.1.10 During the noise survey the RKTP site was at the final stages of construction before
opening. It is understood that trampoline park operates 7 days a week between 0900
hours and 2000 hours on Monday, 1600-2000 Tuesday- Thursday, 1000-2000 onFriday, 0900-2000 on Saturday and 0900-2100 Sunday. Consultation with the site
manager at the completion stage of the newly developed trampoline park, indicates
that the current external plant systems are temporary and are to be replaced withquieter systems. The site manager also stated that all deliveries will take place on the
eastern side of the premises near the site entrance, well away from the proposed
residential development land.
6.1.11 Onsite observations indicate that the only noise from RKTP which is audible on theproposed development Site, is the constant noise from two temporary external AHU
and generator plant systems, approximately 1.5m in height, and currently operational
24-hours in the south west corner of the RKTP premises. It is understood that thecurrent external units are only temporary and are to be replaced permanent systems
which are likely to have lower sound emissions. However, to ensure that the future
noise levels will be acceptable we have been assessed the current noise from the RedKangaroo Trampoline Park to establish a bench mark.
6.1.12 A noise level of 63dB LAeq was measured at ML4 between 0422 hours and 0444 hours
on 2nd February 2018. The measurement included noise from the AHU (External plant1), with the lowest contribution from other noise sources. This was measured at the
closest boundary where noise from the AHU external plant system was dominant. The
measured noise level during this period has been used for this assessment.
6.1.13 A noise level of 62dB LAeq was measured at ML5 between 0409 hours and 0419 hourson 2nd February 2018. The measurement included noise from the generator (External
Plant 2), with the lowest contribution from other noise sources. This was measured at
the closest boundary where noise from the generator was dominant. A sound powerlevel of 87dB(A) LWA was displayed on the external plant. The predicted sound pressure
level at the boundary using this reference level, is 62dB(A). The predicted sound
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 28
pressure level is therefore identical to the measured sound pressure level during the
quiet night-time. This demonstrates that the measured level during this period issuitable for use during the day, evening and night time.
On time Correction
6.1.14 The measurement period is considered to be representative of typical operations atthe RKTP, therefore no on-time correction has been applied.
Acoustic Feature Corrections
6.1.15 BS4142 includes guidance on the application of a noise penalty which should beapplied should the industrial type noise be considered to be tonal, impulsive, or
intermittent at the proposed sensitive receptors.
6.1.16 Noise from both external plant systems is considered to contain tonal characteristicswhich are just perceptible, at adjacent proposed receptor locations. Therefore, a 2dB
penalty for tonality has been applied. No other characteristics are present in the noise;
therefore, no further noise penalties are required.
Comparison of Background and Specific Noise Levels – Daytime, Evening and Night-time
6.1.17 In accordance with BS4142, the specific night-time noise level from the
industrial/commercial premises, in the vicinity of the proposed dwellings has beencompared with the measured background noise level, shown in Table 11.
Table 11: BS4142 Assessment of industrial noise during the night-time at proposed dwellings inthe north western part of the Site (Figures in dB(A)).
External Plant System 1 External Plant System 2
Night-time Night-time
Specific Noise Level (Incl. on-time, and distance correctionswhere applicable)
63 62
Acoustic Correction Feature +2 +2
Rating Level 65 64
Daytime Background Noise Level(dB LA90) 62
Excess of rating over Daytimebackground level +1 0
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 29
Evening Background Noise Level(dB LA90) 61
Excess of rating over Eveningbackground level +2 +1
Night-time Background NoiseLevel (dB LA90) 57
Excess of rating over Night-timebackground level +6 +5
6.1.18 Table 11 shows noise from the external AHU plant exceeds the background noise levelduring the daytime, evening and night-time periods by 1dB, 2dB and 6dB respectively.
This is an indication that the specific noise level is likely to have an adverse impact,
depending on the context.
6.1.19 Table 11 shows noise from the external generator plant exceeds the background noise
level during the daytime, evening and night-time periods by 0dB, 1dB and 5dB
respectively. This is an indication that the specific noise level is likely to have anadverse impact, depending on the context.
Context
6.1.20 BS4142 states that the acceptability of this level depends on the context. BS4142:2014states “The significance of sound of an industrial and/or commercial nature depends
upon both the margin by which the rating level of the specific sound sources exceeds
the background sound level and the context in which the sound occurs”.
6.1.21 The first requirement of this statement has been determined within the noise impact
assessment section above. To determine the context in which the proposed industrial
sound will reside, three factors must be considered, these are;
The absolute level of sound;
The character and level of the residual sound compared to the character and levelof the specific sounds; and,
The sensitivity of the receptor.
Absolute Level of Sound
6.1.22 The impact of a given difference between rating level and background noise level willdepend upon whether the residual sound level is low or high. Where residual sound
levels are very high, the residual sound might itself result in adverse impacts or
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 30
significant adverse impacts, and the margin by which the rating level exceeds the
background might simply be an indication of the extent to which the specific soundsource is likely to make those impacts worse.
6.1.23 The residual noise level at the proposed development Site is high, during the daytime,
evening and night-time periods. Therefore, the exceedance level shown in Table 11becomes more significant, and the exceedance is likely to make any impacts worse.
Character and Level of Residual Sound Compared with the Specific Sound
6.1.24 The character of the residual noise during the daytime is dominated by road traffic
noise from School Lane and the M6. Road traffic contains low to mid-frequency noise,
which is similar to the character of the external plant noise from the premises of RKTP.
Therefore, the noise from external plant is likely to be less distinctive, particularlywhen at a distance from the north east Site boundary of the proposed development
Site.
6.1.25 To assess the noise levels at receptors caused by noise from the premises of RKTP, thespecific noise levels have been compared with the residual noise level taken at ML6
during the daytime, evening and night time periods. The assessment is shown in Table
12 below.
Table 12: Assessment of the difference between the Level of Residual and Specific Noise Level from RKTP atProposed Sensitive Receptors During the Daytime, Evening and Night-time Periods
Description External Plant 1Noise Level dB(A)
External Plant 2Noise Level dB(A)
Daytime
Average residual sound level over the noise monitoringperiod i.e. Existing sound level with no industrial noise 64
Specific Noise 63 62
Rating level 67 66
Difference between residual sound levels and ratinglevel +3 +2
Evening
Average residual sound level over the noise monitoringperiod i.e. Existing sound level with no industrial noise 64
Specific Noise 63 62
Rating level 67 66
Difference between residual sound levels and ratinglevel +3 +2
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 31
Night-time
Average residual sound level over the noise monitoringperiod i.e. Existing sound level with no industrial noise 61
Specific Noise 63 62
Rating level 65 65
Difference between residual sound levels and ratinglevel +4 +4
6.1.26 Noise from the premises of RKTP will exceed the residual sound level at future
receptors at the proposed development Site of between 2dB and 3dB during the
daytime. However, during the night-time, External plant 1 and 2 exceed the residualnoise level by 4dB. This is an indication that the specific noise level may cause an
adverse impact. However, it is reasonable to assume that the permanent external
plant due to replace the existing temporary external plant, will be at least 5dB(A)quieter. Therefore, this will reduce the impact of the noise from RKTP at nearest
proposed receptors to a low impact in accordance with BS4142.
Sensitivity of Receptor
6.1.27 Residential receptors are sensitive, but the sensitivity changes throughout the day,
with the evening periods being more sensitive due to the occupants’ need for quiet
for rest and relaxation.
The industrial noise from the RKTP is unlikely to have a significant impact during the
daytime. However, as stated in BS4142 Section 11.3, mitigation measures can be
incorporated, if required, to achieve a good acoustic environment in both internal and
external living areas, effectively reducing the sensitivity of the dwelling as a receptorlocation. However, it is reasonable to assume that the permanent external plant due
to replace the existing temporary external plant, will be at least 5dB(A) quieter.
Therefore, this will reduce the impact of the noise from RKTP at nearest proposedreceptors to a low impact in accordance with BS4142.
Summary of BS4142 Assessment
6.1.28 The results of the BS4142 assessment, of the existing temporary equipment, when thecontext assessment is taken into consideration, indicate that noise from the premises
of RKTP will cause an impact at proposed sensitive receptors.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 32
6.1.29 Details of the potential external plant systems to replace the temporary generator and
AHU currently running at the RKTP premises could not be obtained. However, it isreasonable to assume that the permanent external plant due to replace the existing
temporary external plant, will be at least 5dB(A) quieter. Therefore, this will reduce
the impact of the noise from RKTP at nearest proposed receptors to a low impact inaccordance with BS4142.
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 33
7 CONCLUSIONS
7.1 Road Traffic Noise
7.1.1 WA has carried out a noise assessment for the proposed residential development
located at Land off School Lane, Exhall, Coventry. The dominant noise source, which
would potentially affect the residents of the proposed residential development, isroad traffic on the M6, M6 slip roads and School Lane.
7.1.2 Industrial noise associated with the RKTP located adjacent to the north eastern part
of the proposed development Site is also audible.
7.1.3 Baseline noise monitoring was undertaken in addition to noise modelling using
SoundPLAN version 8.
7.1.4 WA have assumed locations and orientations of dwellings based on the providedConcept Masterplan (dwg. no. 27290-9302). The proposed buildings represent a
theoretical layout for illustrative purposes only. The theoretical layout includes a
standoff of approximately 85m from the southern boundary of the proposed
development Site.
7.1.5 The resultant noise levels can be assessed against the guideline values suggested by
the World Health Organisation. It should be remembered that the internal guideline
values are health-based and are therefore relatively inflexible; however adequatenoise mitigation is relatively straightforward to engineer. The external guideline
values are based on amenity and allow noise to be balanced against any benefits which
flow from the location of the proposed scheme.
7.1.6 Noise contour Drawing BM11200-025 shows the predicted external daytime noise
levels within proposed gardens. The results indicate that noise levels in the majority
of proposed outdoor living areas across the southern part of the Site, closest to theM6, will achieve the upper guideline level of 55dB LAeq, within the majority of garden
areas. However, some gardens contain small areas which exceed 55dB LAeq.
7.1.7 The results of the noise survey and assessment indicate that to meet the guideline
value of 55dBLAeq (16 Hour) in outdoor living areas, acoustic mitigation should be providedfor those areas located with direct line of sight to School Lane, in the northern parts
of the development.
7.1.8 Gardens could be located on the screened sides of dwellings i.e. not located with adirect line of sight to School Lane. Alternatively, it is recommended a 15m standoff
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 34
combined with a standard close boarded fencing of 1.8m in height between gardens
and School Lane should be sufficient to protect external living areas in the northernpart of the Site.
7.1.9 The results indicate that enhanced thermal double glazing would be required to
ensure that internal noise guideline levels, are met in living rooms and bedroom areaswith a direct line of sight to School Lane and the M6 and slip road, during the daytime,
with windows closed.
7.1.10 Alternatively, to meet the required noise levels, living rooms and bedrooms could belocated on the screened side of the proposed buildings, away from School Lane. A 10m
standoff would provide the required attenuation to ensure that recommended
internal noise levels can be met with standard thermal double glazing, with windowsclosed, within living room and bedroom areas in northern parts of the Site, closest to
School Lane.
7.1.11 The results indicate that enhanced thermal double glazing will be required for
dwellings located closest to, or with a direct line of sight to School Lane and the M6and slip road, during the night-time, with windows closed.
7.1.12 A 15m standoff, combined with standard thermal double glazing, should ensure that
recommended internal noise levels are met within bedrooms of dwellings in northernparts of the Site, closest to School Lane with windows closed during the night-time.
7.1.13 With the windows open, the attenuation provided by the façade would allow the
internal daytime and night-time noise guideline levels to be exceeded in some livingroom and bedroom areas in the southern and northern parts of the development Site.
7.1.14 Acoustic ventilation would therefore need to be installed in some of the living rooms
and bedrooms located nearest to, and a direct line of sight to School Lane and the M6and slip road, during the daytime and night-time. Alternatively, to meet the required
noise levels, living rooms and bedrooms could be located on the screened side of the
proposed buildings, away from the main source of noise.
7.1.15 The requirement for glazing and acoustic ventilation will be confirmed, on a plot byplot basis at the detailed application/reserved matters stage.
7.2 Commercial/Industrial Noise
7.2.1 A BS4142 assessment has been carried out to assess the potential noise impact fromindustrial/commercial sources at the proposed sensitive receptors. The noise sources
HEYFORD DEVELOPMENTSSCHOOL LANE, EXHALLDRAFT NOISE ASSESSMENT
BM11200/010FEBRUARY 2018
Page 35
have been observed to be operational 24 hours. However, it is understood that the
current noise sources are only temporary but will be replaced by permanentequipment in due course. For the purpose of this assessment, the
industrial/commercial sources have been assessed during daytime, evening and night-
time periods, to establish a benchmark against which the future equipment can beassessed.
7.2.2 The results of the BS4142 assessment, when the context assessment is taken into
consideration, indicate that noise from the current external plant at the premises ofRKTP, located to the north east of the proposed development Site, will cause an
impact at the nearest proposed residential dwellings.
7.2.3 Details of the potential external plant systems to replace the temporary generator andAHU currently running at the RKTP premises could not be obtained. Therefore, it is
recommended the temporary systems are replaced with external plant systems that
cause an equal or reduced noise impact on the proposed development Site.
Furthermore, any noise penalties, for tonal, intermittent, or impulsive noise must beconsidered in the final design stage for the proposed sensitive receptors.
7.2.4 It is reasonable to assume that the permanent external plant due to replace the
existing temporary external plant, will be at least 5dB(A) quieter. Therefore, this willreduce the impact of the noise from RKTP at nearest proposed receptors to a low
impact in accordance with BS4142.
7.3 Summary
7.3.1 In policy terms, there is no presumption against development in places with high noise
levels, provided that the noise can be adequately mitigated taking into account the
economic and social benefits of the proposed scheme.
7.3.2 With the proposed mitigation measures put in place, indoor living areas are able to
meet the upper guideline limit of 55dB LAeq and therefore, meet the health based WHO
guidelines. In outdoor garden areas, with few exceptions, the 55dBLAeq (16 Hour) value is
also largely met. However, this is an amenity guideline value and therefore, the fewexceptions to meeting this value should not preclude development.
Appendix A
Noise Monitoring Results
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
14/12/2017– Daytime
22:00-23:00 71.4 63.3 83.8 67.9 73.3 Unattended
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
14/12/2017– 15/12/2017– Night time
23:00 - 23:15 70.8 63.8 78.3 67.5 72.8
Unattended
23:15 - 23:30 70.8 61.7 84.6 66.4 72.8
23:30 - 23:45 70.7 61.3 78.7 67 73.1
23:45 - 00:00 71.2 63 78.2 67.6 73.4
00:00 - 00:15 70.8 63.1 77 67 72.9
00:15 - 00:30 70.3 60.6 78.7 65.7 72.7
00:30 - 00:45 69.2 58.1 76.5 63.7 71.8
00:45 - 01:00 69.2 54.8 77.4 63.9 72
01:00 - 01:15 68.8 58.7 77.3 63.6 71.5
01:15 - 01:30 68.2 57.5 76.9 62.6 71.3
01:30 - 01:45 68.3 56 77.3 61.7 71.4
01:45 - 02:00 66.9 56.9 76.3 60.8 70
02:00 - 02:15 67.4 54.3 77.6 59.7 70.7
02:15 - 02:30 67.3 54.6 75.3 60.8 70.2
02:30 - 02:45 67.5 55.8 75.4 61.2 70.6
02:45 - 03:00 67.5 57.3 76.9 61.8 70.4
03:00 - 03:15 67.4 51.5 75.6 60.1 70.8
03:15 - 03:30 64.8 47.5 74.4 55.7 68.5
03:30 - 03:45 66.6 52.3 75.2 57.8 69.9
03:45 - 04:00 67.4 54.2 76.5 59.8 70.3
04:00 - 04:15 68.4 57.2 78.2 61.8 70.8
04:15 - 04:30 68 57 77.5 61.4 71.3
04:30 - 04:45 69.5 60.3 79.7 63.6 72.1
04:45 -05:00 69.9 61.3 77.2 65.4 72.2
05:00 -05:15 70.4 62 77.2 66.1 72.5
05:15 - 05:30 71.3 62.8 78.7 68.1 73.2
05:30 - 05:45 72.7 66.8 86.6 69.9 74.3
05:45 - 06:00 72.5 68 77.1 70 74.1
06:00 - 06:15 73.1 67.4 81.8 70.6 74.5
06:15 - 06:30 73.7 68.7 79 71.5 75.1
06:30 - 06:45 74.3 69.5 79.6 72.4 75.5
06:45 - 07:00 74.4 70.7 80.2 72.7 75.5
Overall 70.2 47.5 86.6 62.2 73.7
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
15/12/2017– Daytime
07:00-08:00 72.2 65.8 78.3 68.3 74.6
Unattended
08:00-09:00 73 65.8 87 69.1 75
09:00-10:00 74.2 67.7 81.9 72.3 75.4
10:00-11:00 74.1 67.9 79 72.2 75.4
11:00-12:00 73.8 69.7 83.4 71.8 75.1
12:00-13:00 73.4 66.9 79.3 71.4 74.7
13:00-14:00 72.9 66.5 84 70.7 74.3
14:00-15:00 72.9 65.4 87.8 70.6 74.3
15:00-16:00 73.1 66.7 84 71.1 74.5
16:00-17:00 72.8 66.5 78.9 70.8 74.2
17:00-18:00 72.9 66.9 81.6 71 74.2
18:00-19:00 73 67 80 71.1 74.2
19:00-20:00 72.9 67.2 77.8 70.8 74.3
20:00-21:00 72.3 66.1 86.5 70 73.8
21:00-22:00 71.4 62.6 80.3 68.3 73.2
22:00-23:00 70 61 80.3 66.2 72
Overall 72.9 61 87.8 69.7 74.6
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
15/12/2017– 16/12/2017– Night time
23:00 - 23:15 70.2 64.6 76 67.2 72
Unattended
23:15 - 23:30 70.7 63.4 79 67.7 72.5
23:30 - 23:45 69.9 62.1 75.8 66.6 71.9
23:45 - 00:00 69.9 62.2 76.8 66.2 72.2
00:00 - 00:15 69.4 61.2 75.6 65.5 71.6
00:15 - 00:30 69.1 60.6 77 64.9 71.5
00:30 - 00:45 68.9 60.6 76.4 64.2 71.4
00:45 - 01:00 68.6 60.3 76.2 63.6 71.3
01:00 - 01:15 68.6 58.5 76.2 63.5 71.1
01:15 - 01:30 67.7 59.3 75.2 63.1 70.2
01:30 - 01:45 67.5 59.4 76.5 62.5 69.9
01:45 - 02:00 67.9 58.4 76.3 62.6 70.5
02:00 - 02:15 67 55.6 74.7 60.5 70.2
02:15 - 02:30 67.3 56.1 75.3 61.5 70.1
02:30 - 02:45 67.5 57.4 74.9 61.7 70.6
02:45 - 03:00 67.8 55.9 74.7 62.4 70.8
03:00 - 03:15 67.7 55.4 76 61.3 70.7
03:15 - 03:30 68.4 56 76.3 62.7 71.3
03:30 - 03:45 69 59.7 78.1 63.8 71.7
03:45 - 04:00 68.8 60.9 76.6 64.1 71.2
04:00 - 04:15 69.1 60.2 76.7 64.1 71.7
04:15 - 04:30 69.5 61.4 76.3 65.2 72
04:30 - 04:45 68.7 57.8 75.9 63.5 71.5
04:45 -05:00 68.8 60.3 76.2 64 71.4
05:00 -05:15 69.3 59.3 75.3 64.2 71.7
05:15 - 05:30 70 61.6 76.4 65.9 72.3
05:30 - 05:45 70.5 62 76.1 66.7 72.7
05:45 - 06:00 70.5 63.7 78.9 66.6 72.8
06:00 - 06:15 70.2 63 75.4 66.6 72.3
06:15 - 06:30 70.7 64.4 76.5 67.5 72.7
06:30 - 06:45 71.5 66.5 76.7 68.6 73.2
06:45 - 07:00 72 66.8 81.8 69 73.7
Overall 69.2 55.4 81.8 63.7 71.9
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
16/12/2017– Daytime
07:00-08:00 72.3 64.7 79.8 69.6 74
Unattended
08:00-09:00 73.5 67.3 79.7 71.3 75
09:00-10:00 74.3 68.5 80.4 72.3 75.7
10:00-11:00 74.6 69.6 78.8 72.7 75.9
11:00-12:00 74.8 69.7 89.9 72.8 76
12:00-13:00 74.2 68.2 79.4 72.3 75.5
13:00-14:00 74.1 65.6 83.2 71.8 75.6
14:00-15:00 73.3 68.2 84.5 70.8 74.8
15:00-16:00 73.9 68.7 79.1 71.6 75.3
16:00-17:00 74 68.8 79.2 72.1 75.3
17:00-18:00 73.5 68.6 85.3 71.3 75.1
18:00-19:00 73.2 67.9 89.9 71 74.6
19:00-20:00 71.9 64.9 77.8 69.3 73.6
20:00-21:00 70.9 63.1 81.3 67.8 72.8
21:00-22:00 70.8 63.1 78.5 67.6 72.7
22:00-23:00 70 61.2 79.3 65.8 72.3
Overall 73.3 61.2 89.9 69.7 75.2
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
16/12/2017– 17/12/2017– Night time
23:00 - 23:15 68.7 61 75.9 64.6 71.1
Unattended
23:15 - 23:30 68.4 60.3 77.2 64.1 70.9
23:30 - 23:45 68.7 60.5 82.6 64.4 71
23:45 - 00:00 67 54.7 74.9 61.2 69.8
00:00 - 00:15 66.4 59 76.6 61.9 69
00:15 - 00:30 67 57.2 75.7 61.8 69.7
00:30 - 00:45 66.5 57.6 75.8 61.5 69.1
00:45 - 01:00 65.8 56.4 74.6 59.8 68.9
01:00 - 01:15 66.1 53.3 75.5 60.1 69.1
01:15 - 01:30 66.1 56.3 76.8 59.7 69.2
01:30 - 01:45 66.6 54.5 80.2 61.2 69.4
01:45 - 02:00 64.6 52.2 76.1 57.3 67.9
02:00 - 02:15 63.8 50.5 73.6 56.9 67.1
02:15 - 02:30 64.7 47.9 75.8 55.9 68.2
02:30 - 02:45 63.3 46.5 74.6 53.7 67.1
02:45 - 03:00 65 53.7 74.6 58.2 68.3
03:00 - 03:15 65.9 52.6 74 59.3 68.8
03:15 - 03:30 64.7 48.3 75.5 55.8 68.4
03:30 - 03:45 65 51 73.7 58 68.4
03:45 - 04:00 65.2 48.8 73.2 57 68.5
04:00 - 04:15 65.1 52.4 74.5 57.9 68.6
04:15 - 04:30 65.7 50.3 74 58.8 68.9
04:30 - 04:45 65.7 50.4 75 56.4 69.3
04:45 -05:00 65.9 53.1 74.8 58.6 69.3
05:00 -05:15 68 57.1 77.4 62.1 70.9
05:15 - 05:30 67.9 56 75.5 63.1 70.5
05:30 - 05:45 68.5 58.9 74.9 63.7 71
05:45 - 06:00 67.3 54.1 74.7 61.9 70.2
06:00 - 06:15 67.6 53.7 75.7 61.2 70.5
06:15 - 06:30 68.4 60.7 75.6 64 70.6
06:30 - 06:45 69.5 59.2 80.2 64.8 71.7
06:45 - 07:00 69 54.9 77 63.9 71.3
Overall 66.5 46.5 80.2 59.1 69.8
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
17/12/2017– Daytime
07:00-08:00 69.2 59.9 75.8 64.6 71.6
Unattended
08:00-09:00 71.2 61.6 78.2 67.3 73.2
09:00-10:00 73.1 65.9 79.7 70.1 74.9
10:00-11:00 74.6 68.1 79.6 72.4 76.1
11:00-12:00 74.5 68.8 82.2 72.4 75.9
12:00-13:00 75.1 70.3 79.3 73 76.4
13:00-14:00 75.1 68.1 79.9 73.2 76.4
14:00-15:00 76.3 67.9 86.3 74.3 77.6
15:00-16:00 71.5 64.6 80.6 68.6 73.3
16:00-17:00 74.5 66.9 79.8 71.3 76.2
17:00-18:00 76 70.9 80.2 74.4 77.1
18:00-19:00 74.7 68.7 83.8 72.2 76.2
19:00-20:00 73.7 66.5 80 71.4 75.2
20:00-21:00 72.6 65.8 78.2 70.1 74.3
21:00-22:00 72.2 64.1 77.8 69.3 74
22:00-23:00 70.6 61.5 82 67.2 72.6
Overall 73.8 59.9 86.3 69.3 76.1
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
17/12/2017– 18/12/2017– Night time
23:00 - 23:15 69.8 63.1 78.4 66.4 71.7
Unattended
23:15 - 23:30 69.3 62.7 75.5 66.1 71.3
23:30 - 23:45 69.2 60.7 75.2 65.3 71.3
23:45 - 00:00 69.7 62.9 77.2 66.1 71.4
00:00 - 00:15 69.2 60.5 78.8 65.7 71.2
00:15 - 00:30 68.3 59.8 76.9 64.3 70.7
00:30 - 00:45 68.6 60.2 77.5 64.6 70.9
00:45 - 01:00 67.1 58.4 74.4 62.8 69.7
01:00 - 01:15 67.4 59.5 76.4 62.9 70
01:15 - 01:30 67.6 60 76.8 63.5 69.9
01:30 - 01:45 66.5 55.7 75.7 61.4 69.3
01:45 - 02:00 66.7 57.7 75.5 62.4 69.6
02:00 - 02:15 66.7 58.5 76.6 60.9 69.5
02:15 - 02:30 66.2 56.5 74.8 60.8 69
02:30 - 02:45 66.5 58.2 75.7 61.5 69.6
02:45 - 03:00 67.5 57.9 75.3 62.3 70.2
03:00 - 03:15 67.7 58.8 74.8 62.8 70.6
03:15 - 03:30 67.4 60.3 75.7 63.3 69.9
03:30 - 03:45 67.7 59.2 75.3 62.8 70.3
03:45 - 04:00 68.7 59.1 74.9 63.9 71.2
04:00 - 04:15 69.1 59.2 75.9 65 71.4
04:15 - 04:30 69.6 61.1 76 64.5 72.3
04:30 - 04:45 70.8 63.7 76.5 66.9 72.9
04:45 -05:00 71.9 63.7 79.7 68.6 73.7
05:00 -05:15 72.2 65.3 77.4 69.4 73.9
05:15 - 05:30 73 67.2 79.5 70.5 74.6
05:30 - 05:45 73.8 68.4 78.5 71.2 75.5
05:45 - 06:00 73.7 68.4 78.6 71.2 75.3
06:00 - 06:15 73.8 69.7 78.3 71.6 75.1
06:15 - 06:30 74.7 70.3 81.7 72.7 76.1
06:30 - 06:45 74.7 70.7 78.5 72.9 75.9
06:45 - 07:00 74.4 70.8 77.9 72.9 75.4
Overall 70.9 55.7 81.7 63.7 74.4
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
18/12/2017– Daytime
07:00-08:00 72.8 64.3 87.8 67.1 75
Unattended
08:00-09:00 68.5 63.3 76.5 66 70.2
09:00-10:00 69.3 62.4 79.2 65.7 72.3
10:00-11:00 73 67.3 78.3 70.8 74.4
11:00-12:00 72.8 64.4 81.4 70.6 74.3
12:00-13:00 73.1 65.2 83.8 70.6 74.6
13:00-14:00 73.1 65.3 78.6 70.6 74.5
14:00-15:00 73.5 67.6 80.1 71.3 74.8
15:00-16:00 72.4 65.7 77.5 70 73.8
16:00-17:00 70.7 59.9 84.4 63.9 73.4
17:00-18:00 71.4 59.8 79 63.3 73.7
18:00-19:00 73.2 67 79.4 71 74.5
19:00-20:00 72.7 65.6 77.3 70.2 74.3
20:00-21:00 72.1 64.2 77.7 69.3 73.9
21:00-22:00 71.2 61.4 76.5 67.9 73.1
22:00-23:00 70.8 60.3 81.8 67.2 72.8
Overall 72 59.2 87.8 67.2 74.1
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
18/12/2017– 19/12/2017– Night time
23:00 - 23:15 69.9 60.5 77.3 65.7 72.1
Unattended
23:15 - 23:30 69.9 62.6 76.1 66.2 72.1
23:30 - 23:45 70.1 59.2 76.2 66 72.4
23:45 - 00:00 69.8 62.1 76.5 66 71.9
00:00 - 00:15 69.3 60.7 76.9 64.9 71.6
00:15 - 00:30 69.2 60 78.9 64.8 71.6
00:30 - 00:45 68.9 60 76.6 63.5 71.5
00:45 - 01:00 68.5 59 74.8 63.4 71.1
01:00 - 01:15 68.2 59.4 75.8 63.4 70.9
01:15 - 01:30 68.6 59.9 75.9 64 71.1
01:30 - 01:45 68 56.6 76 62.4 70.9
01:45 - 02:00 67.8 59.5 74.5 62.7 70.6
02:00 - 02:15 68 58.5 74.1 62.8 70.6
02:15 - 02:30 68.2 58.3 76.1 63.4 70.7
02:30 - 02:45 68.2 59.5 78.6 62.7 71.1
02:45 - 03:00 67.9 56.9 76.6 63 70.9
03:00 - 03:15 68.2 58.4 75.7 62.9 70.9
03:15 - 03:30 68.9 59.3 78.1 64.1 71.4
03:30 - 03:45 68.7 60 80.2 63.5 71.2
03:45 - 04:00 69.9 62.3 76.6 65.8 72.3
04:00 - 04:15 70.2 62.8 76.1 66.4 72.4
04:15 - 04:30 70.8 62.7 75.9 67.4 72.8
04:30 - 04:45 71.5 64.1 77.6 68.3 73.4
04:45 -05:00 71.9 66 76.9 68.8 73.7
05:00 -05:15 72.6 65.5 79 69.7 74.3
05:15 - 05:30 73.4 68.3 79 70.8 74.9
05:30 - 05:45 73.7 68.6 79.2 71.7 75.2
05:45 - 06:00 73.9 69.3 78.2 71.9 75.3
06:00 - 06:15 74.2 68 78.1 71.9 75.6
06:15 - 06:30 75 70.4 78.5 73.1 76.3
06:30 - 06:45 75 71.6 78.7 73.7 76
06:45 - 07:00 75.2 71.8 79.2 73.7 76.1
Overall 71.3 56.6 80.2 64.6 74.6
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
19/12/2017– Daytime
07:00-08:00 74.6 66.7 79.1 70.8 76
Unattended
08:00-09:00 68.5 62.9 79.4 65.9 70.6
09:00-10:00 70.1 63.5 78.8 66.3 73.1
10:00-11:00 74.9 69.3 85.4 73.1 76.1
11:00-12:00 74.9 69.4 79.5 73 76.1
12:00-13:00 74.9 69.8 83.8 72.9 76.2
13:00-14:00 75.1 71 79.9 73.3 76.2
14:00-15:00 75.1 68.3 81.3 73.5 76.2
15:00-16:00 75 70.1 79.3 73.4 76
16:00-17:00 72 57 85 65.9 75.1
17:00-18:00 71.9 59.4 85.5 66.5 74.3
18:00-19:00 73.9 67.4 79 71.5 75.3
19:00-20:00 73.5 65.9 79.9 70.9 75.1
20:00-21:00 71.3 56.3 78.6 63.9 73.8
21:00-22:00 71.1 52.1 82.7 59 73.8
22:00-23:00 69.8 60 81.2 65.8 71.9
Overall 73.4 52.1 85.5 67.3 75.7
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
19/12/2017– 20/12/2017– Night time
23:00 - 23:15 68.4 56.6 74.4 63.1 71.1
Unattended
23:15 - 23:30 69.5 58.5 80.9 63.9 72.2
23:30 - 23:45 70.1 60 77.5 65.7 72.6
23:45 - 00:00 69.5 58.8 77.1 64.6 72
00:00 - 00:15 69.2 61.5 76.5 64.7 71.5
00:15 - 00:30 69.3 55.2 75.1 63.3 71.9
00:30 - 00:45 68.4 59.3 76.8 62.9 71
00:45 - 01:00 68.2 55.9 76.3 62.8 71
01:00 - 01:15 68.4 55.9 76.6 61.9 71.8
01:15 - 01:30 68.6 60.3 74.9 63.8 71.2
01:30 - 01:45 68.5 57.9 75.9 63.1 71.1
01:45 - 02:00 67.2 55.3 76.2 60.6 70.3
02:00 - 02:15 68.4 58.1 75.6 62.9 71.3
02:15 - 02:30 68.5 58.2 76 62.3 71.4
02:30 - 02:45 66.8 55.4 74.3 61 69.9
02:45 - 03:00 67.5 54.6 74.9 61.3 70.5
03:00 - 03:15 68.3 56.2 76.4 61.7 71.3
03:15 - 03:30 68.6 60.4 76.2 63.5 71.3
03:30 - 03:45 69.5 60.7 76.9 64.7 72.1
03:45 - 04:00 69.3 57.2 75 63.9 71.9
04:00 - 04:15 70.2 63.2 76 66.3 72.5
04:15 - 04:30 71.2 62.6 76.8 67 73.4
04:30 - 04:45 71.1 62.8 77 67.7 73.1
04:45 -05:00 71.7 63.2 79.3 68.3 73.7
05:00 -05:15 72.5 64.9 78.2 69.4 74.2
05:15 - 05:30 72.8 67.1 77.6 70.2 74.4
05:30 - 05:45 73.6 66.9 78.6 71.4 75.2
05:45 - 06:00 73.6 67.9 78.6 71.3 75.3
06:00 - 06:15 74.1 69.3 79.7 72 75.5
06:15 - 06:30 74.8 70.4 79.6 73 76
06:30 - 06:45 75 70.3 78.1 73.4 76
06:45 - 07:00 74.5 71 78.1 72.9 75.6
Overall 71.1 54.6 79.7 63.9 74.4
ML1– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6 Slip Road
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
20/12/2017– Daytime
07:00-08:00 74.6 68.7 79 72.9 75.8
Unattended
08:00-09:00 73.2 66 78.7 68.4 75.6
09:00-10:00 75.1 69.8 79.7 73.2 76.3
10:00-11:00 75.1 67.8 83.5 73.1 76.4
11:00-12:00 75.1 69.1 80.8 73.3 76.3
12:00-13:00 75.1 69.8 84 73.1 76.3
13:00-14:00 74.9 69.4 83.9 73.3 76
14:00-15:00 74.9 70.1 82.9 73.2 76
15:00-16:00 74.7 69.8 80.6 73 75.8
16:00-17:00 73.8 68.1 82.8 71.9 75
17:00-18:00 73.2 64.3 89.1 70.3 74.8
Overall 74.6 64.3 89.1 72.1 76
ML2– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
14/12/2017– Daytime
22:00-23:00 67.2 59.6 72.6 64.1 69.1 Unattended
ML2– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
14/12/2017– 15/12/2017– Night time
23:00 - 23:15 66.8 58.7 73.7 63.4 68.7
Unattended
23:15 - 23:30 66.7 57.2 72.1 62.8 68.6
23:30 - 23:45 66.8 58.3 76.9 62.5 69
23:45 - 00:00 67.2 60.5 72.6 63.3 69.4
00:00 - 00:15 66.6 59.4 71.9 63.3 68.6
00:15 - 00:30 66.2 57.5 71.7 62.1 68.5
00:30 - 00:45 65.2 54.3 71.7 59.5 67.6
00:45 - 01:00 65.1 56.6 70.7 60.4 67.7
01:00 - 01:15 64.9 55.5 70.4 59.8 67.5
01:15 - 01:30 64.5 54.4 71.8 58.8 67.2
01:30 - 01:45 64.3 52.5 73.2 58.2 66.9
01:45 - 02:00 63.7 53.4 71.5 57.3 66.8
02:00 - 02:15 64 48.5 71.5 57 67.2
02:15 - 02:30 63.8 50.5 70.3 58.3 66.5
02:30 - 02:45 64.2 54.2 70.3 58.3 67.1
02:45 - 03:00 64.2 54 71 58.2 66.8
03:00 - 03:15 63.4 49.3 70.7 55.7 66.5
03:15 - 03:30 61.9 51.7 67.6 55.6 65
03:30 - 03:45 63.3 50.9 69 56.9 66.2
03:45 - 04:00 63.8 53 70.6 57.7 66.6
04:00 - 04:15 64.9 54.8 70.6 59.4 67.4
04:15 - 04:30 64.2 54 70.3 59.1 67.1
04:30 - 04:45 65.7 56.5 70.3 61.2 67.8
04:45 -05:00 66.2 57.9 71 62.2 68.4
05:00 -05:15 66.8 60.2 71.1 63.1 68.7
05:15 - 05:30 67.5 61.2 71.8 64.8 69.2
05:30 - 05:45 68.4 63 72.9 66.2 69.8
05:45 - 06:00 68.7 63.9 72.5 66.6 70.1
06:00 - 06:15 69.4 65.1 73.9 67.2 70.7
06:15 - 06:30 69.8 65.8 72.9 68.1 70.9
06:30 - 06:45 70 66.5 73 68.4 71
06:45 - 07:00 70.2 67.8 73 69 71.1
Overall 66.5 48.5 76.9 59.8 69.5
ML2– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
15/12/2017– Daytime
07:00-08:00 67.8 61.6 75.5 63.8 70.3
Unattended
08:00-09:00 69 62.6 74.1 64.5 71.2
09:00-10:00 70.4 65.5 76.8 68.8 71.4
10:00-11:00 70.6 66.5 77.1 69.1 71.5
11:00-12:00 70.4 66.5 74.3 68.8 71.5
12:00-13:00 70.1 64.6 76.2 68.6 71.2
13:00-14:00 69.8 64.7 74.6 68 71
14:00-15:00 69.8 64.3 78.3 67.9 70.9
15:00-16:00 69.8 64.5 73.5 68.3 70.8
16:00-17:00 69.5 63.9 72.7 67.9 70.5
17:00-18:00 69.5 65.7 80.7 68 70.5
18:00-19:00 69.3 63.5 73.9 67.7 70.4
19:00-20:00 69.3 64.1 73.8 67.3 70.5
20:00-21:00 69 64.1 74.4 66.8 70.4
21:00-22:00 68.3 60.5 72.8 65.4 69.8
22:00-23:00 66.9 57.6 74.4 63.3 68.9
Overall 69.4 57.6 80.7 66.3 70.9
ML2– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
15/12/2017– 16/12/2017– Night time
23:00 - 23:15 66.9 60.3 71.2 63.8 68.6
Unattended
23:15 - 23:30 67.2 60.1 72.1 64.5 69
23:30 - 23:45 66.7 59.5 71 63.5 68.7
23:45 - 00:00 66.7 59.7 72.9 63 69
00:00 - 00:15 66.4 58.2 72.2 62.3 68.6
00:15 - 00:30 66.1 57 71.8 61.5 68.5
00:30 - 00:45 65.8 55.6 71.7 61.1 68.4
00:45 - 01:00 65.6 56 71.2 60.3 68.3
01:00 - 01:15 65.3 55.5 71.2 60.4 67.9
01:15 - 01:30 64.7 55.3 71.5 59.2 67.3
01:30 - 01:45 64.7 54.7 71.3 58.6 67.5
01:45 - 02:00 65 55.6 71.7 59.6 67.8
02:00 - 02:15 64.5 52.8 72.5 57 67.6
02:15 - 02:30 64.5 50.7 72 57.9 67.5
02:30 - 02:45 64.7 51.3 71 55.9 68.1
02:45 - 03:00 64.8 54.4 70.9 58.9 67.7
03:00 - 03:15 65 53.4 72.1 57.4 67.8
03:15 - 03:30 65.3 56.5 71.8 59.4 68.2
03:30 - 03:45 66.2 55.6 73.3 60.4 68.7
03:45 - 04:00 66.1 54.7 71.9 60.3 68.8
04:00 - 04:15 66.2 54.9 71.9 60.4 69
04:15 - 04:30 66.5 56.7 71.9 61.7 68.9
04:30 - 04:45 65.9 58.1 72.2 61 68.4
04:45 -05:00 66 55.5 71.5 60.8 68.6
05:00 -05:15 66.7 58.3 72 61.4 69.1
05:15 - 05:30 66.7 58.4 72.5 62.6 68.8
05:30 - 05:45 67.2 57.3 73.8 63.1 69.3
05:45 - 06:00 67.5 60 72.1 63.7 69.4
06:00 - 06:15 67.1 59.9 72.7 63.6 69.2
06:15 - 06:30 67.7 60.9 72.7 64.4 69.5
06:30 - 06:45 68.1 63.1 72.1 65.4 69.6
06:45 - 07:00 68.5 62.4 72.8 65.6 70.3
Overall 66.3 50.7 73.8 60.6 68.8
ML2– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
16/12/2017– Daytime
07:00-08:00 68.4 60.7 73.2 65.7 70
Unattended
08:00-09:00 69.1 63 74.4 66.9 70.5
09:00-10:00 70.1 64.2 73.8 68.3 71.3
10:00-11:00 70.2 65.7 74 68.4 71.4
11:00-12:00 70.2 64.8 77.7 68.6 71.2
12:00-13:00 70.3 64.4 75 68.7 71.4
13:00-14:00 69.9 65.2 73.2 68.3 71
14:00-15:00 69.4 64.6 84.2 67.4 70.4
15:00-16:00 69.9 65.2 73.3 68.2 71.1
16:00-17:00 70 65.3 73.5 68.5 70.9
17:00-18:00 69.6 65.8 74.5 67.8 70.8
18:00-19:00 69.6 64.2 73.7 67.6 70.8
19:00-20:00 68.6 63.2 72.9 66.2 70.1
20:00-21:00 67.8 60.4 72.8 64.7 69.5
21:00-22:00 67.6 58.9 72.9 64.4 69.4
22:00-23:00 66.7 58.5 73.7 63 68.6
Overall 69.2 63.4 74.6 67.0 70.5
ML2– Road Traffic Noise (Unattended) – Adjacent to M6
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
16/12/2017– 17/12/2017– Night time
23:00 - 23:15 66.3 58.6 71.4 62.5 68.4
Unattended
23:15 - 23:30 66.1 58.7 71.6 62.5 68.3
23:30 - 23:45 66.3 57.6 71 62.1 68.3
23:45 - 00:00 65.1 56.6 70.5 60.5 67.5
00:00 - 00:15 64.4 55.3 71.8 60.2 66.6
00:15 - 00:30 64.5 55.1 71.5 59.6 66.8
00:30 - 00:45 63.9 53.3 70.1 58.9 66.5
00:45 - 01:00 63.8 51.8 70 58.5 66.5
01:00 - 01:15 63.8 50.7 70.6 58.2 66.4
01:15 - 01:30 63.4 52.3 70.7 57.4 66.4
01:30 - 01:45 63.4 53 71.3 57.5 66.3
01:45 - 02:00 61.9 50.4 69.2 54.5 65.1
02:00 - 02:15 61.4 48.9 68.8 55.8 64.6
02:15 - 02:30 62.5 48.8 70.2 55.6 65.7
02:30 - 02:45 61.1 45.3 70.5 51.7 64.9
02:45 - 03:00 62.4 50.9 69.6 55 65.8
03:00 - 03:15 63.2 53.5 69.1 56.8 66.4
03:15 - 03:30 62.4 49.9 69.6 54.1 66
03:30 - 03:45 62.9 50.9 69.9 56.1 66
03:45 - 04:00 63.3 50.6 70.3 56.4 66.4
04:00 - 04:15 63.1 51.5 69.7 56.8 66.1
Overall 63.6 52.6 70.4 57.7 66.4
ML3– Road Traffic Noise (Attended) – Approximately 5m from School Lane
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
02/02/2018– Night time
04:30 - 04:45 62.6 54.9 78.8 57.9 62.7
Road traffic noise from
School Lane dominant.
Distant road traffic
noise from M6. Bird
song and distant noise
from sheep also
audible.
04:45 -05:00 61.9 56.2 79 59.2 62.6
05:00 -05:15 62.6 57.5 74.7 59.5 63.7
05:15 - 05:30 64.6 58.3 78.5 60.4 65.4
05:30 - 05:45 66.6 59.3 79.5 61 70.2
05:45 - 06:00 68.5 59.1 81.3 61.6 72.8
06:00 - 06:15 66.8 61 82.6 62.2 70.3
06:15 - 06:30 67.3 60.8 80.5 62.6 71.1
06:30 - 06:45 68.4 61.8 82.1 63.8 72
06:45 - 07:00 69.4 63.3 79.6 64.5 73
Overall 66.6 54.9 82.6 60.1 70.3
ML3– Road Traffic Noise (Attended) – Approximately 5m from School Lane
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
02/02/2018– Daytime
07:00-08:00 69.6 62.2 83.6 64.8 72.9
Road traffic noise from
School Lane dominant.
Distant road traffic
noise from M6. Bird
song and distant noise
from sheep also
audible.
08:00-09:00 68.6 59.7 84.7 62.9 71.9
09:00-10:00 67.5 60.3 82.1 62.3 71.1
10:00-11:00 67 59.1 80.8 61.4 70.8
11:00-12:00 67.1 58.7 81 61.3 70.7
12:00-13:00 67.2 56.9 84.7 60.7 70.7
Overall 67.9 56.9 84.7 61.8 71.5
ML4– Industrial Noise (Attended) – Site boundary nearest to AHU.
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
02/02/2018– Night time
04:22-04:44 63 62 64 62.2 63.5
Constant noise from
AHU with distant road
traffic from M6 and
School Lane audible
ML5– Industrial Noise (Attended) – Site boundary nearest to generator.
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
02/02/2018– Night time
04:09-04:19 62 61.2 62.7 61.4 62.5
Constant noise from
generator with distant
road traffic from M6
and School Lane
audible
ML6– Background Noise (Un-attended) – 80m from School Lane
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
01/02/2018– Daytime
21:00-22:00 64.1 58.9 71 62 65.6 Distant road traffic
from M6 and School
Lane audible 22:00-23:00 63.4 55 74.9 60.9 65
Overall 63.8 55 74.9 61.4 65.3
ML6– Background Noise (Un-attended) – 80m from School Lane
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
02/02/2018– Night time
00:00-01:00 61.4 53.4 69.7 57.8 63.5
Distant road traffic
from M6 and School
Lane audible
01:00-02:00 59.9 52.8 69.9 56.8 61.9
02:00-03:00 60.5 53.1 71.3 56.9 62.6
03:00-04:00 61 53.3 70 57.6 62.9
Overall 60.7 52.8 71.3 57.2 62.8
ML6– Background Noise (Un-attended) – 80m from School Lane
Time LAeq
(dB)
LA min
(dB)
LA max
(dB)
LA90
(dB)
LA10
(dB)
Comments
02/02/2018– Daytime
10:00-11:00 63 62 64 62.2 63.5
Distant road traffic
from M6 and School
Lane audible