26
Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology Strangeness Production at 1 -2 AGeV Erice, September 2008

Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

  • Upload
    cleta

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Strangeness Production at 1 -2 AGeV. Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology. Erice, September 2008. Results mainly from the KaoS Collaboration Phys. Rev. C (2007) Detailed IQMD Calculations Phys. Rep. in preparation with C. Hartnack, J. Aichelin. Au+Au. C+C. u d s. L. u - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Helmut OeschlerDarmstadt University of Technology

Strangeness Production at 1 -2 AGeV

Erice, September 2008

Page 2: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Results mainly from the KaoS Collaboration

Phys. Rev. C (2007)

Detailed IQMD Calculations

Phys. Rep. in preparation

with C. Hartnack, J. Aichelin

Page 3: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Au+Au

C+C

Page 4: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Creation of Strange Mesons

udu

uu

uds

su

p

K-

K- absorption

udu

udu

n

p

udd

su

K+

su

p

K

ddu

n

uds

n

p

udd s

u

K+

ddu

nudu

uds

n

du

udd

su

K+

Page 5: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Mean free path of Kaons and Antikaons

K+: "nearly" undisturbed messengers

mean free path at ρ0:λ(π) = 0.3 fmλ(K+) = 5 fmλ(K-) = 0.8 fm

K- absorption by strangeness exchange reactions: K- p → Y πo

Page 6: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

K+ production below and at threshold

IQMD calculations, Au+Au central collisionsComparision with data

Page 7: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Before getting started: Are the pions okay?

Data: A. Wagner et al., KaoS

N/Z ratio and Coulomb

Page 8: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

KaoS Collaboration, PRC 75 (2007)

A. Förster, F. Uhlig et al., PRL 91 (2003)

Is s exch. in equil.?

Law-of-mass action

J. Cleymans et al., PLB 603(2004)

K- and K

+ are linked

M ~ Aγ

Page 9: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

IQMD C. Hartnack et al., PRL 93 (2004)

Page 10: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Time Evolution of K+ and K- Production

C.Hartnack, H.O., J. Aichelin, PRL 90(2003)

Strangeness exchange dominates! Only 20% of all K- survive!

Page 11: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Kaon Spectra

PRC 75 (2007)

Page 12: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Trend of the K+ slopes

Page 13: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

What determines the shape of the K+ spectra?

According to IQMD calculations

Page 14: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Slopes of K- are lower!

Page 15: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Influence on K- spectra

Au+Au: only 20% survive

about 30% of those do not scatter

Page 16: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

K+ yield determined at production

K+ spectral shape at last collision

K- yield and spectral shape at last collision

Page 17: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Out-of-plane Emission

Ni+Ni 1.93 AGeV (F .Uhlig, PRL 95 (2005))

Page 18: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

IQMD Calculations (C. Hartnack et al.)

Page 19: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

F. Uhlig, et al., KaoS, PRL 95 (2005)

Page 20: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Latest from KaoS: v2 as a function of pt Au+Au 1.5 AGeV, M. Ploskon, KaoS to be published!

IQMD calculations, C. Hartnack

Page 21: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

T. Gaitanos et al., EPJ A12, 421 (2001)

The nuclear equation of state

Densities reached in Au+Au ≈ 2-3 ρ0, in C+C much less

Page 22: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

KaoS Collaboration

C. Sturm et al.,

PRL 86 (2001)

A.Förster et al.,

PR C75 (2007)

RQMD: C. Fuchs et al.,

PRL 86 (2001)

IQMD: C. Hartnack et al.,

PRL 96 (2006)

Page 23: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Results confirmed also with several calculations and other observables!

C. Hartnack, HO, J. Aichelin, PRL 96 (2006)

Page 24: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

• K+ yield determined at production which is around twice ρ0

• K+ spectra dominated by scattering, some influence by KN potential

• K- yield dominated by strangeness exchange at densities around ρ0

• K- spectra influenced by absorption, scattering and potential

Page 25: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Best observable for KN Potential?

K+ yield

K- yield

K-/K+ ratio

Difference in slopes

Spectra at low momenta

v2 (K+)

v2 (K-)

*

-

-

-

**

* (*)

* ?

Input ?

Input, K+, pi, …

Same only K+ cancels

K+ rescattering

K- decay

Difficult to measure

Contribution of rescatt.?

Emission time and potential(?)K+(AuAu)/K+(CC) * * * EOS! Most uncertainties

cancel

Page 26: Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology

Grazie!