41
Float-over presentation December 2002

Heerema Floatover Platform

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Floatover project bried

Citation preview

Float-over presentation

December 2002

OFFSHORE TRANSPORT

& INSTALLATION

ONSHORE &OFFSHORE

STEELCONSTRUCTION

OFFSHOREHEAVY

TRANSPORT

FIELD DEVELOPMENTCONCEPTUAL &

DETAILED ENGINEERING

Heerema Group Divisions

Heerema Marine ContractorsProduct range

Deepwater Construction

Removal

Float-over

Facility installation

Heerema Marine ContractorsProduct range

Deepwater Construction

Removal

Float-over

Facility installation

Contents

IntroductionMethod statement overviewRelationship between componentsFloat-over componentsConclusions

Float over product group

Since 2001Jan Groot – Frank LangeObjective is to establish Float-over as a Heerema Product GroupTendering various prospectsProduct development ; Forklift

Executed float-overs in open seas

Aker Maritime (N)5,000Lan Tay/ Lan Do2002

Technip/Saipem17,000Cakerawala2002

B&R/Heerema11,500Malampaya2001

B&R6,000Wandoo1997

ETPM4,000EPKI1997

Saipem6,000M11996

Saipem7,500M31996

ETPM/Technip9,500Cobo Pambi1996

ContractorTopsides weight (T)ProjectYear

Future Float-overs

HHI/Noble Denton9,000Bunga Raya2003

Saibos/Technip12,000Amenan2003

Aker Maritime (N)/ Clough14,000Bayu-Undan2003

Aker Maritime (N)/ Clough10,000Bayu-Undan2003

Saipem8,000Helang/Layang2002

ContractorTopsides weight

(T)ProjectYear

Upcoming Float-overs

HHI/Noble Denton9,000Bunga Raya2003

Saibos/Technip12,000Amenan2003

Aker Maritime (N)/ Clough14,000Bayu-Undan2003

Aker Maritime (N)/ Clough10,000Bayu-Undan2003

Saipem8,000Helang/Layang2002

ContractorTopsides weight (T)ProjectYear

Dockwise

Forklift development

Started off with ExxonMobil HawkesTwo phasesPhase 1 finishedWorking on phase 2Learned about catamaran

No Market at present

Forklift

Contents

IntroductionTender ActivitiesMethod statement overviewRelationship between componentsFloat-over componentsConclusions

Contents

IntroductionMethod statement overviewRelationship between componentsFloat-over componentsConclusions

Method statement overview

5 phases in float-over sequence– Stand off– Docking– Mating– Vertical load transfer– Un-docking

Stand off position

Barge moored with anchorsDocking lines

Tug 1Tug 2

Docking

Cow horns for entry

Fendering for tight fit

Mating (1)

Mating lines forprecise positioningLoad transfer by

Ballasting and Leg Mating Units

Mating

Vertical load transfer

Load transfer on jacket

Undocking

Undocking with tugsand docking lines

Contents

IntroductionMethod statement overviewRelationship between componentsFloat-over componentsConclusions

Relationship between components

Platform and equipment

Float-over concept Environment

- Jacket + foundation

- Deck

- Transportation barge

- Swell- Workability- Safety

- Docking - Mating - Vertical load transfer - Fendering- Ballasting

Relationship between components

Platform and equipment

Float-over concept Environment

Barges for decks > 10,000 mT

H-541 42 mS45 42 mBlack Marlin 42 mMighty Servant 3 40 m

400’ Piggy Back on Dockwise

Relationship between components

Platform and equipment

Float-over concept Environment

Environmental issues

Workability is governed by Seastate HeaveWeather outlook (i.e. window length)

Accepting lower workability reduces design forces

Relationship between components

Platform and equipment

Float-over concept Environment

Contents

IntroductionMethod statement overviewRelationship between componentsFloat-over componentsConclusions

5 Float-over components

Docking systemMatingFenderingVertical Load transferBallasting

Docking

2 systems used on Malampaya

TugsAnchors/docking lines

2 Docking systems

Docking System

Towing tug

Docking lines

Assisting tug

Docking tug

Anchor lines

Anchor/Docking lines

Mating lines

precise positioning of the deck cones above the jacket guidesStiffness of system versus workabilty8 lines used on Malampaya, 4 proposed in future

Malampaya mating stretchers

Malampaya Fendering

Loose fitTight fit

Vertical Load transfer

Hi-deck method – Leg Mating UnitsUni-deck method - Hydraulics

Leg Mating Units

Mating Cone

Rubber

Receptor

Sand

Ballasting

Malampaya 20,000 m3/hr SubcontractedDockwise vessels 12,000 m3/hr internal

Conclusions

Float-over is complicated, but feasibleRelationship between components require T&I contractor input in FEED studyFew vessels available for topsides > 10,000 mT

More information

www.heerema.com/marine/float-over

Jan Groot tel + 31 71 5799466 Product Manager