Upload
doandat
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
93
Chapter – IV
GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF SMALL SCALE
INDUSTRIAL SECTOR IN PUNJAB AND HARYANA
- AN INTER TEMPORAL ANALYSIS
Indian economy embarked on the path of economic reforms after 1991
fiscal crisis with the objective of lifting the economy from slow growth to a
market driven economy with optimum resource utilisation. A drive for
diversification of economy through rapid industrialisation particularly in the small
scale industrial sector was, therefore, considered necessary for ameliorating the
population out of poverty by providing employment, raising standards of living,
improving the balance of payment situation and attaining self-sufficiency in the
economy. Therefore, small scale industrial sector which had been growing under
the protective umbrella since independence now, been left open to the invisible
hands of the market forces. The sphere of competition has increased manifold,
both horizontally and vertically at national and regional level where the fittest will
survive and inefficient will be weeded out. The basic objective of economic
reforms was to improve productivity growth and competitiveness of Indian
economy. These reforms were aimed at making Indian manufacturing sector in
general and small scale industrial sector in particular, more efficient and
technologically updated, with the expectation that these changes would enable this
sector to achieve higher and sustainable growth both at national and regional level.
In this context, an attempt has been made to analyse growth performance of
small scale industrial sector in Punjab, Haryana vis-a-vis All India during the
reformed era. To fulfill this objective, the present chapter has been divided into
four sections. Section-I provides an overview of the small scale industrial sector of
94
Punjab and Haryana, whereas, Section-II discusses the growth performance of the
small scale industrial sector in India during entire period (1971-72 to 2006-07),
pre reforms period (1971-72 to 1990-91) and post reforms period (1991-92
onwards). Section-III enlightens the growth performance of small scale industrial
sectors in Punjab and Haryana during the respective periods. The last section
concludes the discussion along with the policy implications.
Section-I
At the time of the partition of the Indian sub continent in 1947, Punjab was
bifurcated into two parts: West Punjab (Pakistan) and East Punjab (India), of its
3,59,179 square kilometers and 29 districts, only 1,52,649 square kilometers and
13 districts were left with Indian Punjab. The two Punjab’s were partitioned on
religious grounds and the most prosperous and developed western part went to
Pakistan and the relatively backward eastern part remained in India. In 1956, at the
time of the reorganisation of states on linguistic basis, the former Patiala and East
Punjab States Union (PEPSU) territory was merged with Punjab. However, in
1966, the State was further reorganised under the Reorganisation Act, 1966. The
Punjabi speaking areas were carved with erstwhile Punjab, the Hindi speaking
areas in the north were merged with Himachal Pradesh and the southern Hindi
speaking areas were constituted into a new state of Haryana.
Industrial Progress in Punjab
On the eve of independence, Punjab had been relatively an industrially
backward state, but state activity for the rehabilitation of migrants, traders,
entrepreneurs and workers involving large investment in infrastructural sectors
created necessary environment for industrial development which continued
through the 1950s and 60s. However, industrial sector got a fillip after the Goa
conflict, Chinese aggression and Indo-Pak war, for fulfilling the defense needs in
95
TABLE 4.1
DISTRICT WISE DISTRIBUTION AND TYPES OF
INDUSTRIES IN PUNJAB
District District Wise Concentration of Industries
Amritsar Power Loom Weaving, Wood & Machine Screws, Radio & Transistors,
Agricultural Implements, Paints & Varnishes and Dyes, Electric Fans,
Pharmaceuticals, Printing machinery, Textiles, Chemicals, Soap, Acids
Barnala Small Cutting Tools, Threads by Spinning Mills, Chemicals, Paper,
Towels, Combines, Tractors, Electric Scooty, Bulldozers, Cranes and
their Components, Agricultural Industries.
Bathinda Cotton Ginning and Processing, Pharmaceutical, Flour mills.
Faridkot Agricultural Implements, Cottonseed Oil, Rice Bran Oil.
Fatehgarh
Sahib
Steel re-rolling, Pump Parts, Sewing Machine Parts, Truck Body
Building.
Ferozepur Cotton Ginning and Processing, Grey board, Flour Mills, Agricultural
Implements, Millboard.
Gurdaspur Agricultural Implements, Conduit Pipes, Machine Tools, Soap and
Chemical Products, C.I. Castings, Brassware.
Hoshiarpur Rosin & Turpentine Oil, Paints & Varnish, Sugar, Agricultural
Implements, Pressure Cookers, Paper and Paper Board
Jalandhar Surgical Instruments, Sports Goods, Hand Tools, Automobile Parts,
Cocks & Valves, Pipe Fittings, Bus Body Building, Leather Tanneries,
Ball Bearings, Publication, Switch & Switch -Gears and Rubber Goods
Contd...
96
Kapurthala Agricultural Implements, Pressure Cookers, Fans, Wood & Machine
Screws, Electrical Goods, Rice Mills, Rubber Goods, Bolts & Nuts and
Diesel Engines.
Ludhiana Bicycles and Bicycle Parts, Automobile Parts, Hosiery Goods, Sewing
Machine & Parts, Home Appliances, Machine Tools, Readymade
Garments, Hosiery Needles, Rubber goods, Labels (Metal & Cotton),
Chemical Goods, Oil Engines, Agricultural Implements, Electronic
Goods, Tractor Parts, Cycle Tyres/Tubes, Plastic Goods.
Mansa Agricultural Implements, Cotton Spinning
Moga Agricultural Implements, Milk Products.
Muktsar Cotton Yarn, Rice Bran Oil, Paper
Patiala Automobile Parts, Sewing Machine Parts, Enamelled Copper Wire,
Electrical Goods, Bakery Machinery, Cutting Tools, Biscuits, and
Shoes.
Rup Nagar Agricultural Implements, Pharmaceuticals, Tractors & Parts, Electronic
Components, Electrical Components.
Sangrur Agricultural Implements, Tractor Parts, Cycle Parts, Sewing Machine
Parts, Milk Products, Chilled Rolls.
Shahid Bhagat
Singh Nagar
Light Commercial Vehicles, Pharmaceutical, Yarn, and Sugar
Tarn Tarn Agro Base Industry; Sugar Mill, Spinning Mill, Poultry Farm.
Source: Director of Industries, Punjab
97
woolen textiles, hosiery sector, machine tools and the automobile sector. Further,
in 1960s, with the advent of the green revolution, the increasing demand from the
rapidly growing agriculture sector combined with a rise in export demand boosted
the process of industrialisation. The industries that witnessed boom were agro-
processing, agro- input and consumer industries like textile, woolen products, food
product, metal products, engineering and agricultural machinery. Most of these
industries were set up in the small scale sector and Punjab made fairly rapid
progress in industrial development especially in the small scale segment.
In Punjab, the primary sector contributes 31.23 percent, secondary
27.57 percent, and tertiary sector 41.2 percent of Gross State Domestic Product
(GSDP) in 2007-2008 (Statistical Abstract of Punjab, 2010). In terms of location
small scale industrial groups concentrate in different districts as, hosiery and
garment units are in Ludhiana, basic metal product industry in Mandi Gobindgarh,
Ludhiana, Batala, Jalandhar and Amritsar, and textile units in Ludhiana, Amritsar
and Dera Bassi. Further, various industrial groups including food products, leather
products, chemical products, metal products and machinery etc. are widespread in
the state. Ludhiana leads in Industrialisation and produce 28 percent of the total
industrial output of Punjab and having highest number (166) of large and medium
scale units. Amritsar and Jalandhar were traditionally more advanced, whereas,
Sangrur was declared as centrally backward district. The major small scale
industry in Punjab is hosiery industry, which contributes 91 percent of the total
hosiery goods produced in India, 10 percent of the total production and 48 percent
of total employment of small scale industrial sector in Punjab, whereas, it provides
employment to 54 thousand persons (Statistical abstract of Punjab, 2010). Table
4.1 shows the district-wise distribution and concentration of industries in Punjab.
98
Industrial Progress in Haryana
Haryana is one of the progressive state in India and contributed
significantly to India's socio economic development over the last four decades. At
the time of its formation in 1966, it was industrially backward and predominately
agriculture dominated state. Although state is small in size, covering only
1.37 percent of the total land area of the country and less than 2 percent of the
population but have impressive infrastructural facilities and communication
network. Haryana is a landlocked state in northern India, surrounded by Punjab
and Himachal Pradesh to the north and Rajasthan to the west and south. Its eastern
border touches Uttaranchal and Uttar Pradesh which is defined by river Yamuna.
The State also surrounds Delhi on three sides, forming the northern, western and
southern borders of Delhi. A large area of the State is included in the National
Capital Region (NCR) and two emerging cities Gurgaon and Faridabad are close
to Delhi and are major hubs for information technology and software industry.
Within the State, the cities of Panipat, Rohtak, Gurgaon, Faridabad and
Sonepat have special potential for accelerated socio economic development.
Geographical location of the state provides easy and inexpensive access to
domestic consumer markets. Moreover, the availability of land suitable for
industrial use makes Haryana an ideal location for industry. Haryana’s relatively
small size makes it easier to govern, and its efficient and responsive administration
ensures a minimum of red tape and bureaucratic interference. Moreover, Haryana's
new economic policy approach is to identify ‘target sectors’ in the following
industries: i) Electronics; ii) Automobiles and automobile components;
iii) Handloom, hosiery and textile; iv) Food and agro-based industries; v)
Amusement parks; and vii) Information technology parks.
On the production front, Haryana produces four-fifths of the passenger cars,
two-thirds of the tractors and motor cycles, one-half of the refrigerators, one-
fourth of the sanitary ware and one out of every four bicycles manufactured in
99
TABLE 4.2
DISTRICT WISE DISTRIBUTION AND TYPES OF
INDUSTRIES IN HARYANA
District District Wise Concentration of Industries
Ambala Hosiery, Scientific and Surgical Instruments, Metal Casting, kitchen
Mixer Grinders, Submersible Motor Pumps, Textiles
Bhiwani Textiles
Faridabad Tractors, Motorcycles, Switch gears, Refrigerators, Footwear, Tyres,
consumer durables
Fatehabad Sports Goods, Cotton Canvas Manufacturer and Exporter of Automotive
Exhaust Flex Connectors, Annular Corrugated Stainless Steel Flexible
Hoses, Hose Assemblies and end Fittings, Solar power plant,
Gurgaon IT/ITES, automobiles, automobile parts, hardware, Sports goods, Rubber
products, Readymade Garments, Telecommunication Equipments, Food
items, Air Conditioners, Electrical Goods, Light Engineering Goods,
Pharmaceuticals, Footwear, Chemicals
Hisar Stainless Steel, Automobile Repair, Textiles, Handlooms, Pipes, Food
processing, Cotton Ginning and oil, Engineering components, Leather goods
Jhaggar Glass, Hardware, Somany Tiles, Parle Biscuits, Steel Pipes, Footwear.
Glazed Tiles, Sanitary Ware products.
Jind Agro based Industries, Sugar Mills, Live-Stock based Industries, Woollen
Blankets, Foundry
Karnal Textiles, Agro-Based Industries, Leather Products, Floriculture, Electronic
Motors, Wooden and Steel furniture
Kaithal Food Processing, Manufacture of Cycles, Clinical Laboratory
Thermometers and Water Pipefitting, Radio and Electrical good,
Fabrication of Cement Jallis, Soap and Candles
Kurukshetra Tourism, Plywood/board, Wooden/Steel Furniture, Metal clad Switches,
Nut bolts, Milk Chilling plant, Rigid PVC pipes, Glass Ampoules & Vials,
Jute Bags, Aluminum Utensils, Mono-block motors, Portable TV, Paint &
Contd....
100
Smocem, Submersible Pumps, Rotary Rigs, Carpets, PVC Water Tanks,
Inverters, Craft paper, Pharmaceutical Products, Paper Cones, Chlorinated
Paraffin Wax, Oxygen Gas & Mosquito Repellents
Mahendra
Garh
Marble Industry, Mini Cement Plants, Mineral Grinding Units, Slate
Cutting, RCC Spun pipe, Wire Netting, Mosaic Tiles, Marble/Granite
Cutting and Policy, Oil Expellors, Wooden Furniture.
Mewat Chemicals or Processing Industries, Tyre and Tube Industries, Cement
Industries, Two wheeler Industries
Palwal Textile Industries, Marble Industries, Concrete industries
Panchkula H.M.T., Electronic product, Tractor and Power Operated Agricultural
Implements.
Panipat Cotton Yarn, Staple Yarn, Terry Towels, Soft drinks, Hatcheries,
Handloom Goods, Foundry Products, Urea, Petrochemicals, Power,
Handloom, Power Loom, Dyeing/ Processing, Agro Based Industries,
Foundries, Textile Machinery, Nuts and Bolts
Rewari Cold Rolled Copper Brasses Sheets, Plates, Coils & Foils, Hero Honda,
Sony, YKK, Suraj Maltings, Exide, TVS, Anantraj Industries, National
Metal & Engg. Works, JGB Industries
Rohtak Pottery, Stone dressing, Leather Tanning, Handloom Weaving, Glass
Bangles, Phulkari, Utensil Making and Salt Making.
Sirsa Seed Processing, Wrapping Papers, Milk Chilling, Rice Shelling,
Chemicals, Iron and Steel Fabrication, Agriculture Implements, Leather
Goods, Hard and Straw Board.
Sonipat Atlas Bicycle and Hub of Mushroom Growers in the Country, Leather,
Pharmaceuticals Chemicals, Domestic Electrical Appliances, Herbal
products (Shampoo & Hair Dyes), Syrup and Tablet manufacturing.
Yamuna
Nagar
Metal industry, Sugar, Wood Based Industries, Cement, Steel, Stone
Crushing.
Source: Directorate of Industries, Haryana
101
India (Statistical Abstract of Haryana, 2009). Further, State has adopted a
farsighted industrial policy under which special incentives are offered to the agro
based, food processing, high tech and export oriented industries. Due to its
attractive industrial policy, Haryana is a favoured destination for foreign
investments. Haryana is known for its strong small scale industrial growth from a
modest 4,500 units in 1966-67, to 74298 units in 2008-09 (Directorate of
Industries, Haryana). Many of these small scale industrial units are equipped with
modern machinery and are engaged in manufacturing a wide range of motor cars,
motorcycles, agricultural implements, handlooms and textile items, kitchen
appliances, rubber and plastic products, hand tools and electrical and electronic
components. Haryana’s major exports are motor cars, motorcycles, bicycles, auto
parts, chemical and allied products, electrical and electronic goods, handlooms,
leather goods, rice, pickles, other agricultural products, scientific instruments
including laboratory equipment and manufactured garments. These products are
exported to more than 70 countries worldwide. In Haryana, the primary sector
contributes 22.2 percent, secondary 30 percent and tertiary sector 7.8 percent at
factor cost to Gross State Domestic Product at current prices in 2007-2008
(Economic Survey of Haryana, 2010). Table 4.2 shows the district-wise
distribution and types of industries in Haryana.
Comparative Growth Behaviour of Small Scale Industrial Sector
The growth of small scale industries in India during the last five decades
has been nothing short of a revolution. Consequent to its spectacular growth, the
small scale industrial sector has come to occupy a position of unique importance
in the national economy. Punjab and Haryana, two growing states of India, have
also achieved a phenomenal growth in the field of small scale industrial sector. At
the time of independence, composite Punjab had only a few hundred units
including food grains, processors cotton ginning and bricks kilns. But after
102
independence, especially after the reorganisation of Punjab and Haryana, their
development was carried out in phased manner. In 1960’s with the advent of green
revolution, resource based and foodgrain industries were encouraged and
agricultural implement industries came into existence in Punjab and Haryana. In
seventies, the main stress was on export based and sophisticated items, however,
in the 1980’s, importance was given to energy and agro based industries. But in
the Punjab state, the pace of industrial development received a setback due to the
disturbed conditions. After that in both the States, the growth pattern of small
scale industrial sector changed rapidly with the emergence of knowledge based,
pharmaceutical, services, information and technology industries etc.
The main industrial centres in the state of Punjab are Ludhiana, Jalandhar,
Amritsar, Mandi Gobindgarh, Batala and Mohali. Ludhiana is known for hosiery
and readymade garments, bicycle and bicycle’s components, sewing machine and
its parts, machine tools, auto parts, industrial fasteners, electrical and electronics
industries etc. Jalandhar is famous for hand tools, pipe fittings, valves and cocks,
rubber chappals and shoes, leather products, sports goods etc. Mandi Gobindgarh
popularly known as steel town of Punjab is having more 300 steel re-rolling mills
despite being situated at a place far from the natural resources. Batala is famous in
the country for production of machine tools, whereas, Amritsar is known for food
products, chemicals and chemical products, paper machinery and is also famous
for textiles. Mohali is presently known as a town of electronics and information
technology industry (State Industrial Profile, Punjab, 2001).
From a relatively backward and predominately agriculture dominated state
at the time of its formation in 1966, Haryana has steadily risen to its pre-eminent
position in the industrial sphere as well. Despite various constraints, small scale
industrial sector in the state has responded positively and plays an important role
by supplementing and complementing the large/medium industries. In Faridabad,
Ballabgarh, Sonepat and Gurgaon , this sector has played a vital role in ancillary
103
development of tractors, automobiles, electrical and electronic goods,
hand/machine tools, bicycle accessories etc. Small scale industrial sector in
Yamunanagar, Jagadhri and Rewari have taken up stainless steel, aluminum and
brass utensils in a big way and earned a good name for the state not only in
national but in international market also. The same is the case with the small scale
instruments and manufacturers of mixer and grinders in Ambala, agricultural
implements in Karnal, textiles and handlooms in Panipat, Basmati rice in Karnal,
Kurukshetra and Kaithal and sanitary wares in Bahadurgarh. Many of these small
scale industrial units are today equipped with modern machines producing
qualitative products of international standards. It is to be added here, that 20
percent of the country’s total exports of scientific instruments is from the small
scale industrial units in Ambala. The small scale industrial units of Yamunanagar
meet 60 percent of demand of ammunition boxes of the country’s defence forces
and the units located in Panipat boast of supplying 75 percent of the total need of
the woolen blankets to the Indian army (State Industrial Profile, Haryana, 2001).
Haryana’s small scale industrial sector also enjoys the reputation of manufacturing
largest number of electrical mixies and gas stoves in the country, whereas, district
Karnal tops in the production of agriculture implements and tools in the country.
Section – II
The ongoing economic reforms in India started in 1991, with widespread
doubts and concern as to how these changes would effect the functioning and
sustenance of small scale industrial sector. In this context, present section aims to
assess the impact of economic reforms on the growth performance of small scale
industrial sector in India by making a comparative analysis of average annual
growth rates of units, production, employment and investment during pre reforms
and post reforms period. Since small scale industrial sector in India is diversified
in nature and comprises of tiny household enterprises on the one hand and modern
104
small scale industrial units on the other hand, therefore, it is imperative to analyse
the growth performance of above mentioned indicators so that this sector be made
sustainable in the post reform era.
Table 4.3 reveals that there has been a phenomenal growth of small scale
industrial units in India. It has been observed that total number of units increased
tremendously from a mere 3.18 lakhs in 1971-72 to 128.4 lakhs in 2006-07,
thereby, recording an overall growth rate of 11.81 percent per annum for the entire
study period. Further, small scale industrial sector is not genuinely small as the
word, and small scale industry in India has nothing to do with the scale of
operation. Small scale industrial units deliberately stay as small units by
fragmenting production, to avail of fiscal (excise) concessions and to stay outside
the purview of strict labour laws. It causes the low rate of graduation (small units
to medium units) and the high growth rate in terms of number of units in the
organised segment. Further, it has been observed that after the deregulatory
policies came into force, the growth rate of the total number of small scale
industrial units slipped to the level of 3.99 percent per annum in the post reforms
period from 11.10 percent per annum in the pre reforms period. The data reveals
that though in terms of total number of small scale industrial units there has been
an increase, yet in terms of growth rates deceleration has been noticed in the post
reforms period as compared to the pre reforms period. This deterioration in the
growth of number of small scale industrial sector units may partly be attributed to
the emergence of highly competitive environment in the wake of liberal entry of
multinationals, phasing out quantitative restrictions on imports, and lowering tariff
rates on imports.
On the production front small scale industrial sector plays a vital role as it
contributes almost 40 percent of the gross industrial value added in the Indian
economy. Table 4.4 provides information about the growth of small scale
industrial sector on production front at constant prices (base 1993 = 100) during
105
TABLE 4.3
GROWTH OF UNITS IN INDIAN SMALL
SCALE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR
(Lakhs)
Year Units
1971-72 3.18
1972-73 3.62
1973-74 4.16
1974-75 4.98
1975-76 5.4
1976-77 5.92
1977-78 6.70
1978-79 7.34
1979-80 8.05
1980-81 8.74
1981-82 9.62
1982-83 10.59
1983-84 11.55
1984-85 12.40
1985-86 13.53
1986-87 14.62
1987-88 15.83
1988-89 17.12
1989-90 18.23
1990-91 67.90
Contd...
106
1991-92 70.60
1992-93 73.50
1993-94 76.50
1994-95 79.60
1995-96 82.80
1996-97 86.20
1997-98 89.70
1998-99 93.40
1999-00 97.20
2000-01 101.10
2001-02 105.20
2002-03 109.50
2003-04 114.00
2004-05 118.60
2005-06 123.40
2006-07 128.40
AAGR of Entire Period
(1971-72 to 2006-07)
11.81***
AAGR of Pre reforms Period
(1971-72 to 1990-91)
11.10 ***
AAGR of Post reforms Period
(1991-92 to 2006-07)
3.99***
Note: *** represents that coefficient is significant at 1 percent level of significance.
AAGR stands for Average Annual Growth Rate in Percent
Source: Author’s Calculations
107
TABLE 4.4
GROWTH RATES OF VALUE OF PRODUCTION IN INDIAN SMALL
SCALE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR
(Rs. Crore)
Year Production
1971-72 29800
1972-73 32000
1973-74 34200
1974-75 36100
1975-76 42500
1976-77 46800
1977-78 52800
1978-79 58200
1979-80 66400
1980-81 72200
1981-82 78300
1982-83 84700
1983-84 93500
1984-85 104600
1985-86 118100
1986-87 133600
1987-88 150500
1988-89 169900
1989-90 189900
1990-91 84728
Contd...
108
1991-92 87355
1992-93 92246
1993-94 98796
1994-95 108774
1995-96 121175
1996-97 134892
1997-98 146263
1998-99 157525
1999-00 170379
2000-01 184401
2001-02 282270
2002-03 306771
2003-04 336344
2004-05 372938
2005-06 418884
2006-07 473339
AAGR of Entire Period
(1971-72 to 2006-07)
6.52***
AAGR of Pre reforms Period
(1971-72 to 1990-91)
9.15***
AAGR of Post reforms Period
(1991-92 to 2006-07)
11.88***
Note: *** represents that coefficient is significant at 1 percent level of significance.
AAGR stands for Average Annual Growth Rate in Percent
Source: Author’s Calculations
109
the period 1971-72 to 2006-07. It has been observed that the production of small
scale industrial sector rose to Rs. 473339 crore in 2006-07 from Rs. 29800 crore in
1971-72, thereby registering an average annual growth rate of 6.52 percent during
1971-72 to 2006-07, which is quite remarkable. However, the growth rate of
production at constant prices in the post reforms period has been found to have
increased by about 2.74 percent per annum i.e. from 9.15 percent in the pre
reforms period to 11.88 percent in the post reforms period. It is worth mentioning
that much of growth in the number of units is due to the changes in the definition
of the small scale undertaking from time to time and as a result, a good number of
erstwhile large and medium scale units shifted to the category of small scale
industrial sector. Thus, the growth rate of production at constant prices be
considered as a more reliable indicator of growth performance than the growth in
number of units.
The small scale industrial sector in India generates lot of employment
opportunities and has special significance because of its low investment
requirements. As per the census report of the year 2001-02, employment generated
by small scale industrial sector per Rs.1 Lakh investment was 1.39, while
employment generated by large scale industry was 0.35, implying that large scale
industry requires an investment of Rs. 3 lakh to generate employment for one
person whereas small scale industrial sector generates employment for four
persons with same investment. Thus, the small scale industrial sector provides four
times more employment with the same level of investment in large scale industrial
sector. In the manufacturing sector itself; small and decentralised sector
contributes about four-fifth of manufacturing sector employment in India. The
performance of small scale sector in generating employment opportunities is, thus,
really, a matter of great concern. Keeping in view the acute unemployment
problem in India, creation of employment opportunities would depend crucially on
the development of small scale industrial sector. It would be clear from the fact
110
that while employment in the industrial sector as a whole (large scale, medium
scale and small scale) increased by only 2.21 percent per annum over the period
1972 to 1987, whereas, employment in small scale sector grew at the rate of 5.45
percent per annum thus. Small scale industrial sector can play a crucial role in the
generation of employment opportunities in future also (Goldar, 1993).
The performance of small scale industrial sector of India on employment
front has been presented in Table 4.5. It has been observed that small scale
industrial sector absorbed 158.3 lakh workers in 1990-91 as against only 32.4 lakh
in 1971-72. The results indicate that employment in small scale industrial sector
grew at a rate of 7.46 percent per annum during the pre reforms period. However,
it has been noticed that small scale industrial sector engrossed 312.5 lakh workers
in 2006-07 in comparison to 1.66 lakh in 1991-92, therefore, the results indicate
that employment opportunities in this sector increased at rate of 4.15 percent in the
post reforms period. Further, employment in small scale industrial sector of India
grew at a rate of 6.53 percent per annum during the entire study period. Hence,
data reveals that though there is an increasing trend in terms of number of persons
provided employment, yet in terms of growth rate of employment, a decelerating
trend in employment generation has been observed since 1991. This is
corroborated by a fall in average annual growth rate of employment which
dropped from 7.46 percent per annum during 1971-72 to 1990-91 to 4.15 percent
per annum, during 1991-2007. Thus, on employment front, the reform process has
failed to augment the employment generation process in Indian small scale
industrial sector.
Table 4.6 provides information on fixed investment in small scale industrial
sector of India over the period 1971-72 to 2006-07. It has been noticed that fixed
investment has increased from Rs. 1678 crore 1971-72 to Rs. 93555 crore in 1990-
91 and the annual growth rate worked out to be 14.55 percent per annum.
111
TABLE 4.5
GROWTH OF EMPLOYMENT IN SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR OF INDIA
(Lakhs)
Year Employment
1971-72 32.4
1972-73 35.7
1973-74 39.7
1974-75 40.4
1975-76 45.9
1976-77 49.8
1977-78 54.0
1978-79 63.8
1979-80 67.0
1980-81 71.0
1981-82 75.0
1982-83 79.0
1983-84 84.2
1984-85 90.0
1985-86 96.0
1986-87 101.4
1987-88 107.0
1988-89 113.0
1989-90 119.6
1990-91 158.3
Contd...
112
1991-92 166.0
1992-93 174.8
1993-94 182.6
1994-95 191.4
1995-96 197.9
1996-97 205.9
1997-98 213.2
1998-99 220.6
1999-00 229.1
2000-01 240.9
2001-02 252.3
2002-03 263.7
2003-04 275.3
2004-05 287.6
2005-06 299.9
2006-07 312.5
AAGR of Entire Period
(1971-72 to 2006-07)
6.53***
AAGR of Pre reforms Period
(1971-72 to 1990-91)
7.46***
AAGR of Post reforms Period
(1991-92 to 2006-07)
4.15
Note: ***represents that coefficient is significant at 1 percent level of significance.
AAGR stands for Average Annual Growth Rate in Percent
Source: Author’s Calculations.
113
TABLE 4.6
GROWTH OF INVESTMENT IN SMALL SCALE
INDUSTRIAL SECTOR OF INDIA
(Rs. Crore)
Year Fixed investment
1971-72 1678
1972-73 1937
1973-74 2296
1974-75 2697
1975-76 3204
1976-77 3553
1977-78 3959
1978-79 4431
1979-80 5540
1980-81 5850
1981-82 6280
1982-83 6000
1983-84 7360
1984-85 8380
1985-86 9585
1986-87 10975
1987-88 12621
1988-89 15229
1989-90 18196
1990-91 93555
Contd..
114
1991-92 100351
1992-93 109623
1993-94 115785
1994-95 123790
1995-96 125750
1996-97 130560
1997-98 133242
1998-99 135482
1999-00 139982
2000-01 146845
2001-02 154349
2002-03 162317
2003-04 170219
2004-05 178699
2005-06 188113
2006-07 192511
AAGR of Entire Period
(1971-72 to 2006-07)
15.65***
AAGR of Pre reforms Period
(1971-72 to 1990-91)
14.55***
AAGR of Post reforms Period
(1991-92 to 2006-07)
4.03***
Note: ***represents that coefficient is significant at 1 percent level of significance.
AAGR stands for Average Annual Growth Rate in Percent
Source: Author’s Calculations.
115
However, during the post reform period it increased from Rs. 100351 crore
in 1990-91 to Rs. 192511 crore in 2006-07 with 4.03 percent growth rate per
annum. Hence the comparative analysis shows that the growth of investment
fallen by about 10.52 percent during the post reform period in comparison to pre
reform period. Moreover, a huge reduction in growth of investment is the major
reason behind the fall in employment opportunity in Indian small scale industrial
sector.
Thus, the comparative analysis of growth pattern of key parameters
between pre and post reforms periods reveals that reform process has failed to
influence the growth of small scale industrial sector in terms of number of units,
production (both at current and constant prices), and more importantly
employment in an impressive way. From the perspective of policy formulators, the
performance of small scale sector in generating employment opportunities can be
considered quite commendable. However, a fall in the growth rate of the number
of units and consequently a thinning down in the employment growth after reform
process is a matter of serious concern for the policy makers and planners.
Section – III
The biggest challenge confronting small scale industrial sector both at
national and regional level is not only to survive but also to grow and compete on
a sustainable basis. The small scale industrial sector fulfills the twin objectives of
growth and equity and a vital catalyst for development of growing states like
Punjab and Haryana. In this context, the present section analyses the impact of
economic reform process on the growth performance of small scale industrial
sector in Punjab and Haryana.
Table 4.7 shows trend of expansion in small scale industrial units in Punjab
and Haryana during the period of 1971-72 to 2006-2007. It has been observed that
number of small scale industrial units increased from 12795 to 191639 in Punjab
116
and 8250 to 72509 in Haryana during the entire period. Further, the comparison of
the growth rates of number of small scale industrial sector units in Punjab and
Haryana, shows that in Punjab it grow at the rate of 8.43 percent per annum in
comparison to 6.51 percent per annum in Haryana in the entire period, which
reflects that its growth rate in Punjab is faster than Haryana. The major reason of
slower growth rate in Haryana is closer of small scale industrial units from 1997
onwards. If we compare the growth rate of small scale industrial units in two sub
periods, it can be observed that during the pre reforms period growth rates in
Punjab and Haryana are 14.41 and 14.16 percent, respectively, whereas, during
post reform period, it has been observed that growth rate in both the states
declined drastically. Although, the growth rate of number of small scale industrial
units in Punjab is positive during post reform period, but less than unity, however,
a negative growth rate (-) 4.42 percent per annum was observed in Haryana.
Table 4.8 represents trends in the growth of output produced by Small
scale Industrial sector in Punjab and Haryana during the period of 1971-72 to
2006-07. It has been observed that the production of small scale industrial sector
of Punjab rose to Rs. 3327316 crore in 2006-07 from Rs. 30434 crore in 1971-72,
thereby registering an average annual growth rate of 13.77 percent per annum
which is quite remarkable. In case of Haryana production of small scale industrial
sector increases to Rs 509827 in 2006-07 from Rs 117420 in 1971-72, whereas
annual growth rate of production is 8.6 percent in the same period of time. Further,
the growth rate of production in small scale industrial sector during the post
reforms period in Punjab and Haryana increased by 9.53 percent and 4.83 percent
per annum respectively in comparison to growth rate of 16.62 percent and 14.85
percent per annum respectively in the pre reforms period. It has been observed that
growth rate of output in the two sub periods as well as in the entire period, in
Punjab is higher than that of Haryana but the growth of output in both the states
has decelerated during the post reforms period.
117
TABLE 4.7
TRENDS IN HORIZONTAL EXPANSION OF SMALL SCALE
INDUSTRIAL SECTOR IN PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Year Units in Punjab Units in Haryana
1971-72 12795 8250
1972-73 14308 9652
1973-74 16438 12447
1974-75 18114 12377
1975-76 20271 13069
1976-77 22298 14341
1977-78 24281 15209
1978-79 27509 17450
1979-80 33716 20761
1980-81 43338 26706
1981-82 54021 33901
1982-83 64901 41352
1983-84 76588 48810
1984-85 88271 56732
1985-86 97517 65200
1986-87 108913 74100
1987-88 119888 80100
1988-89 132962 86100
1989-90 146443 92405
1990-91 160368 98996
Contd..
118
1991-92 176378 106011
1992-93 181563 112481
1993-94 184875 119128
1994-95 188187 125775
1995-96 191025 131618
1996-97 193332 137111
1997-98 195383 92501
1998-99 197344 71899
1999-00 199071 73232
2000-01 200603 74170
2001-02 201736 74643
2002-03 202537 74962
2003-04 203224 72427
2004-05 203984 70326
2005-06 204522 71095
2006-07 191639 72509
AAGR of Entire Period
(1971-72 to 2006-07)
8.43***
6.5***
AAGR of Pre reforms Period
(1971-72 to 1990-91)
14.41***
14.16***
AAGR of Post reforms
Period (1991-92 to 2006-07)
0.78***
-4.42***
Note: ***represents that coefficient is significant at 1 percent level of significance.
AAGR stands for Average Annual Growth Rate in Percent
Source: Author’s Calculations.
119
TABLE 4.8
GROWTH RATES OF VALUE OF PRODUCTION IN SMALL SCALE
INDUSTRIAL SECTOR OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(Rs.Crore)
Year Production in Punjab Production in Haryana
1971-72 30434 117420
1972-73 36527 119346
1973-74 42472 120325
1974-75 48390 122370
1975-76 56757 136896
1976-77 633 145944
1977-78 70150 154584
1978-79 77881 163736
1979-80 92360 178881
1980-81 111844 186717
1981-82 134266 235073
1982-83 158552 278571
1983-84 178607 332028
1984-85 195792 370780
1985-86 215099 391800
1986-87 235864 444600
1987-88 268153 480600
1988-89 310859 516600
1989-90 350410 554430
1990-91 404984 503976
Contd..
120
1991-92 443745 636066
1992-93 534512 674886
1993-94 707495 714768
1994-95 873782 754650
1995-96 971394 789708
1996-97 1110622 822666
1997-98 1305774 555006
1998-99 1444448 431142
1999-00 1661085 439140
2000-01 1832450 444762
2001-02 20338.55 452116
2002-03 2252405 459401
2003-04 2498383 466250
2004-05 2847351 474604
2005-06 3087357 480694
2006-07 3327316 509827
AAGR of Entire Period
(1971-72 to 2006-07)
13.77***
8.60***
AAGR of Pre reforms Period
(1971-72 to 1990-91)
16.62***
14.85***
AAGR of Post reforms Period
(1991-92 to 2006-07)
9.53***
4.83***
Note: ***represents that coefficient is significant at 1 percent level of significance.
AAGR stands for Average Annual Growth Rate in Percent
Source: Author’s Calculations.
121
Table 4.9 presented the trends in growth of employment in small scale
industrial sector of Punjab and Haryana and it can be seen that small scale
industrial sector of Punjab absorbed 938684 workers in 2006-07 as against 85176
workers in 1971-72. The result shows that annual growth rate of employment in
Punjab during the entire period is 7 percent per annum in comparison to 11.47
percent and 1.96 percent per annum during pre reforms and post reforms period.
However, in Haryana number of worker employed in small scale industrial sector
increased from 117420 in 1990-91 to 509827 workers in 2006-07. The results
shows that employment increased at the rate of 4.80 percent and 9.51 percent
during the entire period and pre reforms period, however, a negative growth rate
of employment has been observed to the tune of (-)3.53 percent during the post
reforms period indicating that reforms process adversely affected the employment
scenario in Haryana. The results showed that though there is an increasing trend in
terms of number of persons employed, yet in terms of growth rate of employment,
it is dismal. Thus, on employment front the reforms process has failed to augment
employment opportunities in the small scale industrial sector of Punjab and
Haryana.
Table 4.10 provides information on fixed investment in small scale
industrial sector of Punjab and Haryana over the period of 1971-72 to 2006-07. It
has been observed that fixed investment in Punjab has been increased from 77.94
crore 1971-72 to 1348.78 crore in 1990-91 at the growth rate of 15.2 percent per
annum. However, during the post reform period investment increased from
1348.78 crore in 1990-91 to 5502.94 crore in 2006-07 at the growth rate of
investment 9.27 percent per annum. Further, it has been observed that investment
growth rate in Punjab during the entire period is 12.42 percent per annum. Hence
the comparative analysis of growth of investment during the pre and post reform
122
period in Punjab reveals that the growth rate of investment fallen by about 6
percent during the post reform period in comparison to pre reform period. Thus,
the overall growth rate of 12.42 percent imitates that double digit growth rate in
the pre reform period is the major contributor in overall growth rate of small scale
industrial sector in Punjab.
In case of Haryana, it has been noticed that fixed investment has been
increased from 85.80 crore 1971-72 to 1962.95 crore in 2006-07. Further, the
annual growth rates of investment in small scale industrial sector of Haryana grow
at the rate of 7.91 percent per annum in the entire period in comparison to 16.81
percent and (-) 2.22 percent, per annum respectively during the pre and post
reforms period. Hence, the comparative analysis of growth of investment in
Haryana, during the pre and post reform period divulges that the rate of growth of
investment descended drastically during the post reforms period in comparison to
pre reforms period. However, during the pre reform period the growth of
investment in small scale industrial sector of Haryana is higher than that of Punjab
but during the post reform period inverted u-shape trend has been noticed in small
scale industrial sector of Haryana.
Thus, in both the states under study, the comparative analysis of growth
pattern of key parameters between pre and post reforms periods reveals that the
reform process has failed to influence the growth of small scale industrial sector in
terms of number of units, production, employment and investment. However small
scale industrial sector of Punjab dominates the small scale industrial sector of
Haryana in terms of number of units, employment, investment, and production,
therefore, appropriate policy packages must be designed to rehabilitate the small scale
industrial units in both the states so that they can meet the challenges of globalisation.
123
TABLE 4.9
EMPLOYMENT GROWTH IN SMALL SCALE
INDUSTRIAL SECTOR OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Year Employment
Punjab
Employment
Haryana
1971-72 85176 117420
1972-73 92217 119346
1973-74 111419 120325
1974-75 122162 122370
1975-76 136334 136896
1976-77 152638 145944
1977-78 163134 154584
1978-79 186197 163736
1979-80 223979 178881
1980-81 264869 186717
1981-82 304155 235073
1982-83 339972 278571
1983-84 378846 332028
1984-85 424478 370780
1985-86 464809 391800
1986-87 503397 444600
1987-88 545560 480600
1988-89 594354 516600
1989-90 633964 554430
1990-91 668845 503976
Contd..
124
1991-92 711417 636066
1992-93 732580 674886
1993-94 755883 714768
1994-95 777070 754650
1995-96 802329 789708
1996-97 821170 822666
1997-98 840568 555006
1998-99 864592 431142
1999-00 883005 439140
2000-01 897642 444762
2001-02 909266 452116
2002-03 920077 459401
2003-04 930036 466250
2004-05 943664 474604
2005-06 951318 480694
2006-07 938684 509827
AAGR of Entire Period
(1971-72 to 2006-07)
7.00***
4.80***
AAGR of Pre reforms Period
(1971-72 to 1990-91)
11.47***
9.51***
AAGR of Post reforms Period
(1991-92 to 2006-07)
1.96***
(-) 3.53***
Note: ***represents that coefficient is significant at 1 percent level of significance.
AAGR stands for Average Annual Growth Rate in Percent
Source: Author’s Calculations.
125
TABLE 4.10
TRENDS IN GROWTH OF INVESTMENT IN SMALL SCALE
INDUSTRIAL SECTORS OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(Rs. crore)
Year Investment in
Punjab
Investment in
Haryana
1971-72 77.94 85.80
1972-73 100.24 107.81
1973-74 118.26 149.36
1974-75 133.91 157.19
1975-76 153.35 176.43
1976-77 169.21 205.08
1977-78 194.72 229.66
1978-79 224.54 277.46
1979-80 272.73 344.46
1980-81 332.12 469.68
1981-82 401.63 613.61
1982-83 491.71 781.55
1983-84 571.96 956.68
1984-85 656.31 1107.33
1985-86 738.94 1142.75
1986-87 830.02 1296.75
1987-88 943.49 1401.75
1988-89 1084.21 1506.75
1989-90 1217.72 1617.09
1990-91 1348.78 1732.43
Contd..
126
1991-92 1498.8 1851.90
1992-93 1620.98 1968.42
1993-94 1763.61 2084.74
1994-95 1981.35 2201.06
1995-96 2216.16 2303.31
1996-97 2491.33 2399.94
1997-98 2859.99 1618.77
1998-99 3360.67 1257.50
1999-00 3793.62 1280.83
2000-01 4109.14 1297.22
2001-02 4373.79 1359.43
2002-03 4641.39 1421.49
2003-04 4815.91 1509.25
2004-05 4973.06 1584.41
2005-06 5105.79 1604.71
2006-07 5502.94 1962.95
AAGR of Entire Period
(1971-72 to 2006-07)
12.42***
7.91***
AAGR of Pre reforms Period
(1971-72 to 1990-91)
15.20***
16.81***
AAGR of Post reforms Period
(1991-92 to 2006-07)
9.27***
(-) 2.22***
Note: ***represents that coefficient is significant at 1 percent level of significance.
AAGR stands for Average Annual Growth Rate in Percent
Source: Author’s Calculations.
127
Section – IV
Small scale industrial sector is a major contributor to production, export
and employment, therefore, it becomes imperative to study its growth performance
in the post reforms period. In light of this view a comparative analysis of average
annual growth rates for the pre and post reform periods has been carried out for
the key parameters like number of units, production, employment and fixed
investment. The analysis shows Liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation
have failed to mark a significant dent on small scale industrial performance. The
impact of economic reforms on all these indicators has not been as encouraging as
expected and thus reflects that it has failed to contribute much towards the growth
of small scale industrial sector in Punjab, Haryana vis-a-vis India. The analysis
reveals that though in terms of absolute number, units have been increase, yet in
terms of growth rate, deceleration has been noticed in the post reforms period as
compared to the pre reforms period at national as well as regional level. The fall in
the growth rate of the number of units has been observed in small scale industrial
sector and this may partly be attributed to the emergence of highly competitive
environment in the wake of liberal entry of multinationals, phasing out of
quantitative restrictions on imports, and lowering of tariff rates on imports.
The comparison of the growth rates of number of small scale industrial
sector units in Punjab, Haryana vis-a-vis All India, shows that at All India level it
grew at the rate of 11.81 percent per annum in comparison to 8.43 percent per
annum in Punjab and 6.51 percent per annum in Haryana in the entire period.
Further, in the pre reforms period it grew by 11.10 percent at All India level and
14.41 percent, 14.16 percent in Punjab and Haryana respectively. However, in the
post reforms period it declined to 3.99 percent at All India level, 0.78 percent in
Punjab and (-) 4.42 percent in Haryana. The growth rate of production in the post
reforms period at All India level increases by 11.88 percent per annum in
comparison to growth rate of 9.15 percent in the pre reforms period, whereas, in
128
Punjab and Haryana in post reform period, it increases by 9.53 percent and 4.83
percent per annum respectively in comparison to growth rate of 16.62 percent and
14.84 percent per annum respectively in the pre-reforms period. Further, the
analysis reveals that there exist 6.53 percent, 13.77 percent and 8.60 percent, annual
growth rate of production at All India, Punjab and Haryana respectively during the
entire period. It has been observed that growth rate of output in Punjab in the two
sub periods and in the entire period under study is higher than that of Haryana.
With regard to employment, the study reveals that though there has been an
increase in the absolute number of employed in small scale industrial sector of
India, yet in terms of growth of employment, a decelerating trend in employment
generation has been observed since 1991. The results shows that annual growth
rate of employment increased at the rate of 6.53 percent, 7.46 percent and 4.15
percent per annum during the entire period, pre reforms and post reforms period
respectively at All India level. However, in Punjab and Haryana, a decelerating
trend in employment has been exhibited since 1991. The annual growth rate of
employment in Punjab during the entire period was 7 percent per annum in
comparison to 11.47 percent and 1.96 percent per annum during pre reforms and
post reforms period. In case of Haryana, reforms process adversely affected the
employment scenario. The results showed that employment increased at the rate of
4.80 percent and 9.51 percent during the entire period and pre reforms period,
however, a negative growth rate of employment has been observed to the tune of
(-)3.53 percent during the post reforms period. Thus, on employment front the
reforms process has failed to augment employment opportunities in the small scale
industrial sector both at national and regional level.
The comparison of the growth rates of investment in small scale industrial
sector of Punjab, Haryana vis-a-vis All India, shows that at All India level it grew
at the rate of 15.65 percent per annum in comparison to 12.42 percent per annum
in Punjab and 7.91 percent per annum in Haryana during the entire period. Further,
129
it has been observe that investment growth rate in pre reforms period were 15.20
percent per annum, 16.81 percent per annum and 14.55 percent per annum,
respectively in Punjab, Haryana and at All India level whereas, in post reforms
period it declines to 9.27 percent per annum, (-) 2.22 percent per annum and 4.03
percent per annum respectively in Punjab, Haryana and at All India level.
Hence, economic reforms and liberalisation process fails to bring
significant improvement in the performance of small scale industrial sector in
terms of number of units, employment, production and fixed investment in Punjab,
Haryana and at All India level. From the perspective of policy formulators, the
role of this sector in generating employment opportunities can be considered quite
laudable, however, a thinning down in employment growth after reform process is
a matter of serious concern for the planners and policy makers. Moreover, with the
slowing down of some of the major economies of the world and ever increasing
competition from Chinese economies, some corrective steps are required on the
part of the Centre and State governments to make this sector vulnerable.
Therefore, technologically vibrant and internationally competitive small scale
industrial sector needs to be encouraged to make it sustainable both at the national
and regional level in the reformed era.
************