52P09SEM97 2.112** RICH LAKE 010

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

GEOPHYSICAL REPORT

ON

A MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

OVER THE

JAMES REID PROPERTY

ROND LAKE AREA

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

ONTARIO

PROPERTY

WRITTEN FOR

SURVEYED BY

V/RITTEN BY

: 8 km northwest of Fort Hope, Ontario on Albany River

: 51" 35' North Latitude Approx. 88* West Longitude

: N.T.S. 52P/9 and 16

: OHIO RESOURCES CORP. 806-850 West Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C., V6C 1E2

: TRANS-ARCTIC EXPLORATIONS LTD.815-850 West Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C., V6C 1E2

: Patrick Cruickshank, Gfcophysicist GSOTRON1CS SURVEYS LTD. 530-800 West Pender Street Vancouver. B.

DATED : April 22, 1988. MAY 16

LANDS SECTIONLTD.

Engineering A Mining Geophysicists

VANCOUVER. CANADA

a.mee RICH LAKE 010C

TABLE OP CONTENTS

SUMMARY

CONCLUSIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS

i

li

iii

INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL REMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

PROPERTY AND OWNERSHIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

LOCATION AND ACCESS . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... . . . . . ... . . . . .. .... .. .. 3

PHYSIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

HISTORY OF PREVIOUS WORK . . . . . . ... . . . ..... .... .. . ..... . ... 4

GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .... . . . . 6

MINERALIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .... . . 7

MAGNETIC SURVEY:

(A) instrumentation and Theory ........................... 8

(B) Field procedure ...................................... 9

(C) Compilation of Data .................................. 9

GEOLOGICAL MAPPING AND SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY ... . ..... ........ 10

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS ............... .. ....... ............ 10

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 13

GEOPHYSICIST'S CERTIFICATE ..... .. ................ ........ 14

RECEIVED

MAY l 6 1988

MINING LANDS SECTION

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

At Back of Report

Property Location Map

Claim Location Map

In Back Pocket

Grid Map

Magnetometer Survey Data and Contours

1:6,000,000

1: 63,360

Map

1

2

1: 2,000

1: 2,000

3

4

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

SUMMARY

A magnetic survey with some selected rock specimens, was com

pleted over sixteen of the twenty claims comprising the James

Reid property from January 24 to March 10, 1988. The property is located approximately eight km northwest of Fort Hope, and one km

southwest of Rond Lake in the Thunder Bay Mining Division, Ontario. Access to the property is either by boat up the Albany

River from Fort Hope, or by float plane onto Rond Lake. The ter rain is overall flat with a thick growth of coniferous and

deciduous trees. The purpose of the survey was to locate prob

able zones of gold/sulphide mineralization similar to that occur

ring on the Noramco property to the immediate north as well as to

assist in the geological mapping of the property. An additional

purpose was to locate possible iron formations, which in the Pickle Lake area to the west contains gold in mineable

quantities.

The property is underlain by volcanics of precambrian age which

strike in a southwesterly arc and through Pickle Lake to the west and Red Lake to the southwest. Gold mineralization was dis

covered within a shaft sunk near the centre of the property. It

occurs within white quartz veins in tension fractures associated

with a porphyry dike. Exploration on the adjacent Noramco prop erty, through the use of IP and electromagnetic surveys, dis

covered gold values associated with sulphide-quartz veins within

wide shear zones.

The magnetometer readings were taken every 20 metres on 40-metre separated north-south lines with some detail lines spaced 20

metres. They were then diurnally corrected, plotted and con toured. Some rock specimens were chosen for petrographical ob

servations, where possible, during the magnetometer survey.——————————————————— —————-~ GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD. ————————————————————————

ii

CONCLUSIONS

The magnetometer survey has produced three major anomalies

labelled A, B, and C, which reflect strong magnetite con

centrations within either intrusive sills or with pyrrho

tite in sulphide-rich shear zones.

The third anomaly, C, occurs striking off the northern boundary of the property and could represent an extension

of Noramco's wide shear zone H-12, which contains gold in

sulphide-quartz veins.

Any of the three anomalies, especially the more intense

parts, could be reflecting iron formations. Magnetic

anomalies in the Pickle Lake area, 80 km to the west, con

tained gold in mineable quantities.

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

iii

RECOMMENDATIONS

Detail geological mapping should be conducted to further qualify the magnetometer survey results, help to determine the parameters of follow-up geophysical surveys, and to locate possible areas of mineralization.

All three anomalies should be covered by a MaxMin HLEM sur vey to determine whether the magnetic zones are conductive, and if they are, the parameters of each conductor. This

will result in more accurate drill targets. This survey should be conducted such that the survey lines are run at

right angles to the apparent strike of each conductor.

IP and resistivity surveys should be conducted on the prop erty over the same lines as the MaxMin survey. This will help determine whether sulphides occur with the magnetic

sources, and thus where gold is likely to occur.

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

4 GEOPHYSICAL REPORT

ON

A MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

OVER THE

JAMES REID PROPERTY

ROND LAKE AREA

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

ONTARIO

INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL REMARKS

This report discusses the survey procedure, compilation of data and the interpretation of a magnetic survey carried out over the

James Reid property between January 18, 1988 and March 17, 1988.

Mobilization and demobilization within this period occurred from

January 18th to 23rd and March 11th to 17th, inclusive, with the

magnetometer survey occurring continuously over the rest of this

period {January 24th to March 10th, inclusive).

The survey was carried out by Trans-Arctic Explorations Ltd.

under the field supervision of Patrick Crook, of Salmon Arm, B.C., field technician. He was assisted, alternately, by Tom

Gabert of Salmon Arm, B.C., Tom Yellowhead of Fort Hope, Ontario,

and Daniel Waswa of Fort Hope, Ontario. A total of 65.15 line km

of magnetometer survey were completed at a 20-metre station interval, (3.18 of these km done as detail work) and 5.12 km of base and tie lines were done as well.

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

1 ^-^———^1 '11111111111111111

' 2

The primary purpose of the magnetometer survey was to delineategeological structure and to map lithology as an aid in theexploration for gold mineralization. An additional purpose wasto locate iron formations which contain gold in mineable quan tities in the Pickle Lake area 80 km to the west. Some rockspecimens were randomly collected for petrographical observationduring the progress of the survey where

The survey was done at the request ofOhio Resources Corp.

PROPERTY AND OWNERSHIP

The property consists of 20 contiguous

possible.

Grant Lang, president of

claims of one unit each,staked within the Thunder Bay Mining Division as shown on map 2,and as described below. The first fourthis magnetometer survey as they hadwith a magnetometer.

Claim Number No. UnitsTB651376 to

TB651379 4

TB840781 toTB840794 14

TB740028 to

TB740029 2

units were not covered bybeen previously surveyed

Anniversary Date

March 1

May 3

April 30

The claims are owned by Robert James Reid of 1961 Fairport Road,Pickering, Ontario, L1V 1T5, and are under option to OhioResources Corp. of Vancouver, B.C.

— ————————————————————— ————— — —— GEOTRntJirS SURVEYSITTI l ————— : ————————————————————————————————————————————

1 1 —————i 4iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

LOCATION AND ACCESS

3

The property is located about 8 km northwest of the indianVillage of Fort Hope, Ontario, on the Albany River and approxi mately one km southwest of Rond Lake.

The geographical coordinates are 51* 45'approximately 88" 00' west longitude.

Access is gained by charter float-plane fromAnother method of access is to board a dailyAustin Airways from Geralton to Fort Hope,rented to reach the property.

PHYSIOGRAPHY

north latitude and

Nakina to Rond Lake.scheduled flight by

where a boat may be

The property lies within the Patricia District near the edge ofthe Hudson Bay lowlands in the Canadian Shield. The property isgenerally flat, with predominant areas ofswamp. Bedrock exposures are scarce, due toclay about the property, making geologicalSome outcrops occurring on the property have

muskeg and sprucea mantle of bouldermapping difficult.

revealed some struc-tural information, including the outcrop near the shaft, whichrises about 10 metres above the muskeg.

The main water sources are three small creeks flowing easterlyacross the property as well as possibly acentral part of the property.

swampy area in the

The forest cover consists of black spruce, balsam, poplar, birch,and cedar with small shrubs and grasses typical of a muskeg area.

————————————————————— — ————— —— GEOTRONICS SURVEYS 1 TO — i

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

HISTORY OF PREVIOUS WORK

The history of previous work includes 514 feet of diamond drill ing in four holes during the months of September and October, 1986 using an "X-ray" drill with a 7/8-inch diameter core. Drill holes were sunk to trace the eastern and western extensions of veins encountered within the shaft.

Previous history is quoted from J.E. Londry's July, 1987 report:

"The property on which the mine shaft is located, was first staked during 1927 by Lorne Howey (a well known Canadian prospec tor) and associates. The claims were staked as a result of locating gold-bearing quartz veins in the local volcanic rocks.

"Shaft sinking was started in February 1928, and by September had been put down to a depth of 100 feet where a level was estab lished and some drifting and cross-cutting was completed. During the summer of 1928 extensive prospecting was also done on the surface. One vein, striking east-west was uncovered and trenched in various places for a distance of about 575 feet east of the shaft.

"At that time E.M. Burwash, a geologist working for the Ontario Department of Mines, reported in the Department's annual report, Volume XXXVII - Part 2, 1929, assays from this vein averaging about 1.0 oz. gold per ton across an average width of 34.5 inches.

"No further exploration was carried out until 1935, when the property was taken over by Port Hope Consolidated Gold Nines. This company pumped the water from the mine workings and

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

continued the exploration and development of the 100 foot level. A total of about 250 feet of drifting and cross-cutting was completed during this phase of the work. At this time a new ore shoot was opened up on the 100 foot level. It consists of a quartz vein that was followed for a distance of 25 feet, striking diagonally to an east-west porphyry dike with which the main ore zone is associated. The average grade in this vein is reported to be $21.32 per ton with the price of gold at $35.00 per 02., but the width of the vein is not known.

"About 5000 feet of diamond drilling was done from surface at this time, but no assay results from this drilling are available.

"in 1946 Golden Hope Mines Limited was incorporated to acquire the property, and in the autumn of that year, a magnetic survey was made by the firm of Koulomzine, Geoffrey and Brossard of val D'Or, Quebec. A major northwest-southeast striking fault was implied by that survey, but no further work was done at that time.

"Another exploration program was done during 1958 and 1959. At this time, surfa.ce sampling was carried out and some bulk samples were sent for testing, but in 1959 the work was suspended because of lack of funds.

"The claims expired on June 24, 1982 and four claims were re- staked around the shaft area on June 25, 1985 by Mike Labchuk and John Londry. Two more claims were staked during the month of October, 1984, to make a group of six. During this time, a mag netometer and VLF-EM survey had been carried out over the six claims, the number of which are TB-651376 to TB-651379 inclusive and TB-740028 and TB-740029. A strong magnetometer anomaly was located striking north of west and extending to the north-west boundary of the six claim group.

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

4l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

"During the last of October, 1985, fourteen more claims were staked to increase the property to its present size of twenty contiguous mining claims.

"In November, 1985, the titles of the original six claims were transferred to Robert James Reid. The titles of the remaining fourteen claims were also transferred to Robert James Reid in August, 1986."

GEOLOGY

The following is quoted from Londry's July, 1987 report on the property:

"The property is underlain by rocks of Precambrian age. Located in the Patricia district near the edge of the Hudson Bay lowlands in the Canadian shield, the property lies within a broad band of volcanic rocks that extend westward from Fort Hope through Pickle Lake, about 80 miles to the west, and then continues in a south westerly arc, passing north of Lac Seul, to extend westward beyond the mining community of Red Lake, 150 miles to the south- west and not far from the Manitoba border.

"The Keewatin volcanic rocks vary in composition from mafic to felsic and are intruded throughout by various masses, dikes and sills that may be acidic, basic, porphyritic or pegmatitic in nature.

"Locally the property is underlain by both basic and felsic vol canics, although much of the exact nature of the geology is inferred, because of the scarcity of outcrops.

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

"The property appears to be underlain by basic volcanics in con tact with a mass of granite instrusive to the south. However, the geology in the shaft area consists of medium to acidic volcanics which are intruded by porphyry dikes striking east-west and dipping steeply to the south."

MINERALIZATION

The following has been quoted from Londry's July 1987 report on the property:

"The gold showings around the shaft appear to be associated with a porphyry dike which has been traced for 1,000 feet by trench ing, it is about six feet wide and dips 80 degrees to the south and strikes east-west. White quartz veins, occurring in tension fractures in the volcanic rocks near the contact with the por phyry dike, carry gold values. One vein that cuts through the upper part of the shaft is reported to have exhibited abundant visible gold. Highgrade was also reported in the workings on the hundred foot level, but it is not known whether the vein under- gound is the same as the one at surface."

"Other areas where mineralization may occur but which cannot be noted directly because of the lack of rock outcrops, is in the north and western area of the property. The areas of particular interest are those areas of magnetic highs that were located on claim TB - 651376 and shown on the magnetometer survey map dated February 1985. The interest in these areas is enhanced by the fact that a soil sample taken along line 800 W south of the mag netic anomaly, yielded an anomalous gold value. This sample was taken near a stream that drains the western area of the property and which may originate near or cross a zone carrying gold miner alization.

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

B

"Another aspect of these magnetic anomalies is that they may be caused by the presence of iron formation in the volcanics. The mining community of pickle Lake, about 80 miles west, owes its existence to the fact that iron formations (which show up as mag netic anomalies) carry gold values in mineable quantities. If the magnetic anomalies in the northern area of the property are caused by iron formation, they may also carry gold values, as the Fort Hope area lies on the eastern extension of the same volcanic belt as that at Pickle Lake. Also, gold values occur elsewhere on the property (shaft area), increasing the possibility that other mineralized zones may also carry gold".

Another interesting feature noted by Londry is the occurrence of a large gabbro diorite sill about 275 metres south of the shaft area and about 180 metres wide.

MAGNETIC SURVEY

(A) Instrumentation and Theory

The magnetic survey was carried out with a model MP-2 proton precession magnetometer, Serial no. 8110777, manufactured by Scintrex Limited of Concord, Ontario. This instrument reads out directly in gammas to an accuracy of +1 gamma, over a range of 20,000 - 100,000 gammas. The operating temperature range is -35* to +50* C, and its gradient tolerance is up to 5,000 gammas per meter.

Only two commonly occuring minerals are strongly magnetic, mag netite and pyrrhotite; magnetic surveys are therefore used to detect the presence of these minerals in varying concentrations. Magnetics is also useful as a reconnaissance tool for mapping

G6OTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

1geologic lithology and structure since different rock types have different background amounts of magnetite and/or pyrrhotite. A third highly magnetic mineral, ilmenite, sometimes occurs within gabbro intrusives, but is quite rare.

(B) Field Procedure

Across the approximate centre of the claim a westerly-striking baseline was established. The survey lines were put in perpen dicular to the base line, that is, north-south with stations established every 20 m.

Readings of the Earth's total magnetic field were taken at the 20 m stations along the lines.

The diurnal variation was monitored in the field by the closed loop method to enable the variation to be removed from the raw data prior to plotting. Base stations for this method were located every 40 metres on the base line, and the primary base station located at L O on the baseline.

(C) Compilation of Data

An arbitrary value of 56,500 gammas was subtracted from each reading and the residuals plotted along the survey lines on map 4 at a scale of 1:2,000. The values range from 59,294 to 70,552 gammas, to give a range of 11,258 gammas. Contours were drawn in at a 100-gamma interval for values below 60,000 gammas, and at a 500-gamma interval for values above this level.

G60TRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

1

i 4iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

GEOLOGICAL NOTES AND SAMPLE SPECIMENS

Some rock specimens for petrographical observation were taken andoccassional notes were made on the strike and dip of geologicalstructure by Pat Crook, field technician. It was done along thegrid lines while the magnetometer survey was carried out. Themapping is quite limited due to the property being greatlycovered by overburden. The geological notes and location of rockspecimens are shown on maps 3 and 4 at a scale of 1:2,000.

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The ground magnetometer survey has produced very promisingresults, and has shown three good linear trends labelled A, B,and C, striking across the property in nearly westerly and north easterly trends. The background magnetic field of the propertyis relatively quiet, varying approximately 400 gammas from about59,500 to 60,000 gammas. This range is very likely the reflec tion of the basic volcanics of the Keewatin volcanics.

Magnetic highs, that is, containing values above 60,000 gammas,in all likelihood reflect varying concentrations of magnetitewithin porphyry dikes and/or sills such as those encounteredwithin and near the shaft. The most prominent magnetic highoccurs in the southeastern quadrant of the property, and reachesa value of 70,552 gammas (or 10,552 gammas above background).

Anomaly A is the longest anomaly on the property, curving up from52E where is strikes easterly to 136W where it strikes west-northwesterly. This anomaly is open both to the east and to thewest, and is typically an 800-gamma high (above background), withlocalized highs reaching up to a magnitude of 3,900 gammas nearanomly B.

—————————————————————— - ————— -^— GEOTROMK"L*5 RI IRVFVR 1 m — —— ——— : ———————————————————————

4l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

Anomaly A occurs approximately 300 metres south of the shaft and averages about 130 metres wide. Structural mapping within the area of anomaly A shows strike directions agreeing very well with the strike on anomaly A. This evidence indicates that this anomaly is therefore due to magnetite.within the gabbro-diorite sill occurring at this same location. Anomaly A represents a good target for further exploration, since it could be associated with the porphyry dikes near the shaft, which have associated gold. Rock specimen S-K, taken coincident with anomaly A on line 32E, gives an anomalous gold value, suggesting gold is associated with this anomaly.

Anomaly B, about 150 metres south of A, is the strongest magnetic anomaly on the property, reaching a peak of 70,552 gammas — over 10,000 gammas above the background level. This anomaly has a length of at least 800 metres subparallel to anomaly A, and in two separate parts, to exhibit a near linear trend. Such high magnetic field values suggest a concentration of magnetite within either a porphyry dike or a gabbro-diorite sill similar to that causing anomaly A.

Anomaly C occurs within the northwestern quadrant of this grid, striking at least 1,300 metres at approximately N60*E, and open both to the northeast and to the southwest. This anomaly is wider than either A or B, and the near-linear trend and high magnetic values at its northern end, suggest that this anomaly could be structurally controlled, or perhaps caused by a dike or sill similar to that producing anomaly A. A dipole with an amplitude of 6,350 gammas occurring at the northern end suggests a local concentration of magnetite. A widening of the anomaly between 72W and 116W suggest the causative source {perhaps a sill, or a shear zone) widens as well.

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

12

Another very likely explanation of anomaly C involves the results of Noramco's exploration of their property to the immediate north. A wide shear zone, named H-12 f strikes westerly very close to the James Reid property and has produced good gold values. It is possible that anomaly C reflects an extension of zone H-12, and thus warrants further exploration.

A magnetometer survey completed on the four central claims in 1985 produced two good anomalies within claim TB-651376 (see Londry's report Feb. 1985). The positions and orientations of the contours show some correlation with those of anomaly C, and thus could reflect the same, or a related, geologic system. The contours at the southern edge of that survey show an east-west orientation which agrees with the orientation of anomaly A.

Any of the anomalies A f B, or C, could be reflecting iron forma tions, especially the stronger or more intense parts of the anomalies. As Londry states in his July, 1987 report, iron for mations in the Pickle Lake area, 80 km to the west, contain gold in mineable quantities. Thus the stronger parts of the anomalies become prime explortion targets.

Respectfully submitted, GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LD.

Patrick Cruickshank, Geophysicist

April 22, 1988

44/G418

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD.

1 ——————————^

11111111111111111

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Londry, J. E., Report on 1985 Field Work on Mining ClaimsTB-651376 to TB-651379, TB-740028 and TB-740029,Area of Rich Lake, Thunder Bay M. D., Ontario,Dece,ber 5, 1985.

Londry, J. E., Report on 1986 Diamond Drill Program on James ReidMining Property, Area of Rich Lake, Thunder BayM. D., Ontario, July 22, 1987.

Keevil, G.A., News Release on Opikeigan Lake Property, forGolden Lake Resources Ltd., and Pure GoldResources Inc., January 18, 1988.

*

————————————————————————— - —————— —— ~ fiFOTRnNirft RI JRX/FVS 1 TO n ——— —————————————————————————

:.11111111111111111

,GEOPHYSICIST 'S CERTIFICATE

I, M. A. PATRICK CRUICKSHANK, the City of Vancouver, in theprovince of British Columbia, do hereby certify:

That i am a consulting geophysicist of Geotronics Surveys Ltd.,with offices located at #530-800 West Pender Street, Vancouver,British Columbia.

I further certify:

1 . i am a graduate of the university of British Columbia(1986) and hold a B. A. Se. degree in GeophysicsEngineering.

2. I have been practising my profession, and have beenactive in the mining industry, for the past two years.

3. l am registered with the British Columbia Association ofProfessional Engineers as an Engineer-in-Training, ingeophysics.

4. This report is compiled from data obtained from magneticand soil geochemistry surveys carried out by Trans-Arctic Explorations Ltd., under the supervision of RickSimpson and under the field supervision of Pat Crookfrom January 24th to March 10th, 1988.

5. The work was done entirely at the request of Grant Lang,President of Ohio Resources Corp.

6. I have no interest in, nor will I be receiving anyinterest in Ohio Resources Corporation as a result ofwriting this report.

^z^/ ' L~^2#M. A. Patrick Cruickshank,Geophysicist

April 22, 198844/G418

——————————————————————— ————— — —— GEOTRONICS SURVEYS 1 TO ——— . ———— . ———————————————————————

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

JAMES REID PROPERTY

l

\ROND LAKE \

--.

111

11

_ t _ .

j1l \

....

.--

--

L E G E N D

5 - GRANITES, UNDIFFERENTIATED

A - DIORITE AND GABBRO

3 - DACIT/C METAVOLCANICS

2 ~ BASIC METAVOLCANICS

1 - IMPURE QUARTZITE AND SCHISTS

w - FAULT

-- -- - - GEOLOGICAL CONTACT

*. , -

2

3

EABEMET? LAKE

VV

-FORT HOPE

SCALE' l ' 63,360MILE

O 1/2 l

OH/0 RESOURCES CORP.( ROND LAKE AREA ) THUNDER BAY M.D. ONT.

JAMES REID PROPERTV

CLAIM LOCATION MAP

DRAWN BOS kmDATE APRIL 88 MAP No. 2

PROPERTY LOCATION

KtomttM WO tf

tMnWO

OHIO RESOURCES CORRROND LAKE AREA, THUNDER BAY M.D.,ONT.

JAMES REID PROPERTY

PROPERTY LOCATION MAP

SCALK'

l'10,000,000D ATI r

April 1968NT.f.

Minist North" and ft/

chemical

52P09SEee07 8.11389 RICH LAKE 900

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) Township or Claim fi.^ i D

- f\ ft CT(C

Author of Report.Address of A..thm- 530-306

Covering Dates(finecutting to office)

Total MflES of Line fiat- "7Q..CL7

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer^.—Radiometric———Other——————

DAYS per claim

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne curveys)

Magnetometer.

o

.Electromagnetic(enter days per

SIGNATURE^

.Radiometric ———

K. S. SlmfHM

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

^ffZl "*.

^^tnHMPtr**"

i * * * A *** jQf&z&jEL

•HlMM

laT E "*-

•••••••XA*cnvn*A***a***vAu/***'

"T••••••f •n

U

TOTAL CLAIMS.

S37 (85/12)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval —— Profile scale ————

t J~3 f

Contour interval.

MAG

Instrument./OO i) ITL* . Ho

Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.

—— \

C. \Ot

Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value.

.Number of Readings JLine spacing.

.^'-? f

**\J j M Q MA JM...

goQ it

^ C O^COl KJ

T

prgcVJPV.rP^o,

kQQ

Halites

— | 0'O.OOtt!t

fC

CT

GRA

z2H^N*M

tt••l

S

Q[i

tJ

Z*M

Hfc>NH

bi— iM(dC*

Instrument,Coil configuration

Accuracy. Method:Frequency.

D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back D In line

Parameters measured.

Instrument.

Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

accuracy.

Method 1 1 Time Domain

- Off timetime.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

(ipedfy V.L.F. sutton)

O Frequency Domain— Frequency

— Range——————;

D Parallel line

-i!', Ol . r ' - ' - ' \?,, CJ&u* /3of Wo;k ' j ^•-WJ-.-..-"- " ^/ri '""Wo.-*;- f-*

f/ -'.-ii i oG: ^,-rai.

G, -•,.c : -..-.ii-.-.;a:

of

N!ol(r: — O-Vy

2 •^^2^0^:^^

ih.s 'c. m. aV -c'r. 5 : ' sd m ;i he

Cr."

:JAt\65. V

.•;-.-t-.tf i, -r! .V-;.-i:i".s 'j* Author (ot Goo-Tscr.r.f a!

-.o -C"-".; 's fv:-;-)!ic-i;evi pe"- Each Claim In CoU.'inns at right J

i::'.; .-l .',0 '.l.iyi. 'This

•A -'c :'-.f ':a'-~t -j--d:

' Pror.hti:-.;tal l-. .... . . J ...- . .. ,. .-. . - ,. ...J . ...- .. .

' -- .. -u. ... ,. ' "•''i* r'f'~.-

•- " -' - ;.-;-':i' ' -.:e -- ..j' ..--:

MAY ft*m

MINING tANDS 3 'SECT10N.•~.'0. r '--r- c.-l

^Lo.i^9.^'?iv1 -!.I f?yi^?.d...i]r!!li-^i "?5r i5f!.^5Jii s.nf*' ^-. -—,.^.Mining C!aun

^11; 11. .. U2l''.?'.-,....!

.&HV783. '^

SHC-/S6.

Dayi C'.

xfe..

JWTAHJO

ASStSSMENT OFFICE

Mining C!a^nrv 'picVix "f" 'Sllr.ier ' " "

——— .J.........

"' :'| •-•--•--1 -- - ' i

• i•i

cd

re - i [i!1 0 ; J. '--2 -o - -'-' r";i:"3 ; r -3 o[:: '-:'S

.

F ^ pt r d. Oays C-.

-

-.. . -

. . . .

,: " ; ^^ .^ : ~- - |Ac.-^^,'Ve,

Work

i "' - " -

V;-,!-, Djy; ;-,' ' * ':,', : -ed on cigla i'S) i-our Tr^!-r cc.-

, d'd!!smtn, etc..

01 days include wo K po^o.T'.t.rt by

1 yr r- O' f. -Vf-y

Tachnif.al Tcchr'ts! r,?,vsra - Dt.ys Ton! C-tcM*

[JAO"Jo. o* Claims

De tt Oair

7 ,-;.if 0' J J-'-PV

TecV.nl.-al Days L : IH-C. :i:.ig Divs Total

Mo. o* Dsjj,

i:::]* ra [:::::^:::x::::]T,-, , ,- r,..-

-.... ' -: T:-, '--i: li r^.'-i , .'.c-c ^'.Ilf"r.-i. C'-

S? 0*C' J -* C'e-'fi

- - . . r-,-

x f T.i,' - r 5 C-i;: : r 5, s - . -J C-^-t

\ : :iC : "S

90 N

TB

8407

90

CO -j

TB

840789

TB

84078

TB

8407

85

JL

JL

i l

(y) s-o.

52Pa9SEe007

2.11

28a

RICH

LA

KE210

ffl-

J-

Ti

8407

9/

T B

8407

88

8401TI

3

TB

84

0

jit

86 '84

JL

JL j*. U._

^

jt JL

^

TB

8407

92Jk

.

JL.

Jit

Jit

J/ ^

TB

3407

^3

Jfc- r

HP-

T/E

L/N

E

N0

2

O

TB

65/3

76

ft

DDH

86-5

f L

^

65/3

77

8407

94

80

N

70

N

60

N

tt,

1 X

"J

7400

28

TB

65/3

79

T/E

L//V

E

N0

3

.•^h

- S-

H

TB

65/3

78

t *

lJL

JL

A.

DD

H 8

6-3

,4

-— s

re74

0029

TB

8407

82

S-J

•x.

100 TB

84078/

S-K

100

sk

50 40

N

30

N

20

N

10

N

B.L.

OO

10

S

20

S

30

S

4O

S

50

S

60

S

CM l -J

l ^ CO l -J

l si

C\J l -J

o CNJ l -J

egOD

O

o

oCD en i u

l -J

OD

OD -J

ODO

00 -J

RIOD

co

O

COCD in

CM IOo

e\J

roSl og

Q

Cgeg

l -J

00 -J

O

O

i -J

l UJ l -J

l LU CD

l LUl UJ

l LU

o C\J

-j

l UJ sj-

OJ -J

l LU OD

CM i -J

l LU Cg

ro

UJ ^0

i-O

l UJ o

l UJl LU -J

l LU CM

IO -J

TRU

E

NO

RTH

SC

AL

E

O 20

40

60

8O

10

0II

l l

l l

/cm

. * 2

0m.

LO

CA

TE

D

CLA

IM

PO

ST

S

l. 2.

~ 84

0782

2-

8407

83

B

3.

#

f -

840794

B

4.

^

4-

8407

94

B

5.

#

l-

8407

92

B 6.

#

l -

65/3

76

B 7

^2- 6

5/37

9

B

8.

^

3-

65/3

76

#1

-84

07

84

B

9.

#

3 -

PA

-32

84

8

B

10.

#

l -

840789

B

li

# l'

8407

85

B

12.

#

l -

8407

90

B /3

. #

2-

PA

-328

48

B

14.

#

3-

\0\7

8\7

(W

ES

T B

OU

ND

ARY

OF

NO

RAM

CO

C

LA/M

J

RO

CK

S

PE

CIM

EN

LO

CA

TIO

NS

* S

- A

. D

UM

P

* S

- B.

L

/OO

W f

10

- 4

4 S

t S

- C.

L

60

W

- 6

2 S

l S

- D.

L

/04

W -

44

S

i S

- E.

L

4 W

- 26

S

i S

- F.

L

12

E ~

80

N

* S

- G.

L

12

E-

75 N

t S

- H.

L

12

E-

10

N

i S

- f.

L 20

E

- 52

S

1 S

- J.

L

24

E -

38

S

* S

- K.

L

32

E -

37

S

* S

- L.

L

32

E-

42 S

LE

GE

ND

±

±

SWAM

P

^^-"

-^

ROAD

)—c

TRE

NC

H

X

ST

RIK

E 8

D/P

D

IRE

CTI

ON

CLA

IM

PO

ST

(LO

CA

TED

)

CLA

IM P

OS

T (A

SS

UM

ED

)

——

— -

C

LAIM

BO

UN

DAR

Y LO

CA

TIO

N

——

—

AS

SU

ME

D

CLA

IM

LIN

E

G

DIA

MO

ND

DR

ILL

HO

LE ~

CO

LLA

R

OH

IO

RE

SO

UR

CE

SR

ON

D L

AK

E A

RE

A,

THU

ND

ER

B

AY

M

.D.

ON

TAR

IO

JAM

ES

R

EID

P

RO

PE

RTY

GR

ID

AN

D

CL

AIM

M

AP

DA

TE

MA

RC

H

1988

SC

ALE

'l

Cm

.s 2

0 M

.

^ k

mft |

g FIG

URE^

M

Ap

3o

f 4

TR

AN

S -

AR

CT

IC

EX

PLO

RA

TIO

NS

ASSUMED LO

CATI

ON

3 POST (N

.W. CO

RNER

; OF

AS

SU

ME

D

LOC

ATI

ON

O

F N

OR

THE

RN

C

LAIM

B

OU

ND

AR

YC

LAIM

# T

B 8

4O

790

TIE

LIN

E N

01

4597

99—

T

-9767

9772

+9

7I3

'971

0

' 7

PC

-1 *

*

TRU

E NO

RTH

SC

AL

EO

-20-

40

60

80

. 10

0

TIE

LINE

N0

2

DD

H 8

6-5

7727

f97

20

971

8 .9

704

^747

'9749/9

787'

'98(

72

99

35

-9

975

9707/3

713,

97

0?

LE

GE

ND

NO

TE --

5O 0

00

GAM

MAS

. (i.

J H

AVE

BE

EN

S

UB

TRA

CTE

D

FRO

M

MO

ST

DAT

A V

ALU

ES

TO

C

OM

P/L

E

THfS

MA

P.

CO

NTO

UR

IN

TE

RV

ALS

'

VALU

ES

AB

OV

E 60000/1

0000^5

00-

VALU

ES

BE

LOW

6Q

OO

O/IO

000 *

IQO

-

INTE

RV

AL

INTE

RV

AL

TIE

LIN

E

N0

3

600O

O/IO

OO

O

CO

NTO

UR

LE

VE

L M

AR

KE

D

VWTH

B

OLD

LI

NE

•9T

7&

-9706

——

A,B

*C

-- M

AG

NE

TIC

.A

NO

MA

LIE

S

BA

SE

S

TATI

ON

(P

RIM

AR

Y)

O D

IAM

ON

D

DR

ILL

HO

LE -

CO

LLA

R -

CO

RR

ECTE

D M

AG

REA

DIN

GS

(IN

GA

MM

AS

;

STR

IKE

a D

IP

DIR

ECTI

ON

•S97

SS

?7Z5

/9

1IO

j

OH

IO

RE

SO

UR

ON

D L

AK

E A

RE

A,

THU

ND

ER

B

AY

M

.D.

ON

TAR

K)

JAM

ES

R

E/D

PR

OP

ER

TY

MA

GN

ETO

ME

TER

S

UR

VE

Y(

DA

TA

a1

20

0l

Cm

. *

20 M

MA

RC

H

1988

NTS

:52

P/9

8 /

6 F!

GURE

: M

AP

4B.

D.S

. km

TR

AN

S -

AR

CT

IC

EX

PLO

RA

TIO

NS

S2P

09S

E0C

W7

2.1

12

00

R

ICH

LA

KE