Upload
haroon-rasheed-ahmed
View
93
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Simple Cycle Energy CenterCore Engineering Consultant
Arlington, Tx
Dec 12, 2015
Team of Engineers Ali Shafikhani
Haroon Rasheed
Mohammed Muqtadar
Chhokila Lama
Sandeep Shah
Tenzing Lama
1
Project Outline ● Project Introduction
● Scope: Foundation Design
● Conclusion and Recommendations
● References
➢Turbine
➢GSU Transformers and
Breakers
➢ Four Water Tank
2Speaker: Ali Shafikhani
IntroductionPlant Layout
3Speaker: Ali Shafikhani
543 megawatt simple cycle gas fired electric generating facility in
Maverick County, Texas
Water
Tanks
GSU Transformers &
Breakers
Turbines
Foundation Design
A TM2500 Gas Turbine
GSU Transformers and BreakersA Water Storage Tank 4
Speaker: Ali Shafikhani
Turbine Options
Speaker: Ali Shafikhani5
Mat Foundation Design(for 90% of loads)
● Strong sand layer over weak clay layerEliminating the top clay layer.
Speaker: Ali Shafikhani
Foundation dimension: 23*64 (ft) with huge safety factor
6
Mitigation of Turbine Vibration
loading EffectApplication of light weight high compressive strength geofoam blocks as structural
void fill material (Ɣ=0.7-2.85 pcf).
- To mitigate destructive vibration loading effect.
- In order to design a lightweight mat foundation to prevent subsequent
settlement.
- To make a cost effective design.
- To decrease construction time period.
Speaker: Ali Shafikhani
Resource:
(https://hayfieldhouse.wordpress.com/category/foundation/)Resource: (http://cenews.com/article/9649/geofoam-a-lightweight-fill-
alternative)
7
Lightweight foundation on expansive soil
8
Expansive soils:
- High settlement and swelling potential during seasonal rainfall.
- Load concentration motivates this settlement and swelling effect.
- differential settlement will occur.
Mitigation of Swelling effect of top
Clay layer
Speaker: Ali Shafikhani
Deep foundation dimension: 16*3*5 (ft)(Resource: Chen (1988), O’Nill (1988))
9
Combined Footing● Strong clay layer over weaker sand layer
Speaker: Ali Shafikhani
Foundation dimension: 4.5*10 (ft). F.S>4
10
Elastic Settlement Mat Foundation and Combined Footing:
● Sand layers:
● Clay layers:
● Mat Foundation: Se= 0.68 (in)● Combined Footing: Se= 0.36 (in)
Speaker: Ali Shafikhani
11
Elastic Settlement Drilled shaft:
● This case: Se= 0.48 inch
Speaker: Ali Shafikhani12
Storage TankWater 50,000 gal
Height of Steel Tank = 50 ft
Tank Thickness = 1.5 in
Structural load = Tank + Water
=
418 kips
Bore log 2
Speaker: Sandeep Shah 13
●2 X 2 Group Pile●Length of Piles= 20 ft ●Circular Concrete Pile●Diameter = 1.5 ft●Spacing (S) = 2.5 D
Dimensions
Speaker: Sandeep Shah14
Pile Capacity●Tip Resistance (Sand layer) Qp = 319 kips
(Meyerhof’s Method)●Skin Resistance (Clay+Sand) Qs = 74 kips
(Alpha & Meyerhof)●Ultimate bearing Capacity of 4 piles without the
group effect Qu = 1572 kips●Group efficiency = 1.11 (Piles behave individually)●Ultimate load bearing capacity of the group pile
Qg(u) = 1572 kips●F.S. = 3, Qall = 524 kips > 418 kips
Speaker: Sandeep Shah15
Settlements●Elastic Settlement
➢ Individual= 0.180 in
➢Group piles = 0.33 in
● Consolidation Settlement
➢ Group = 1.15 in
Total Settlement = 1.48in <1.5 in
● Pile Cap
➢ Dimension=6ft X 6ft
➢Thickness=3.3 ft.
➢Weight= 17.8kips
Group Pile Weight of 4 piles = 21.2 kips
Speaker: Sandeep Shah 16
GSU TRANSFORMERProperties of Transformer
Dimensions
Width : 65” = 5.41’
Length : 84” = 7’
Height : 96.625” = 8.05’
Weight
APPROX. WEIGHT:
CORE & COIL - 3832 lbs.
CASE - 3011 lbs.
LIQUID (343 gal.) -2744 lbs.
TOTAL - 9587 lbs.
17Speaker: Haroon Rasheed
GSU TRANSFORMERASSUMPTIONS:
● Pressure bulb reaches a depth of 2B (12’)
● The three layers from the depth of 4’ to 16’ are considered to be one sandy layer with a ᶲavg of 34⁰ and ϒavg of 115 psf
18
Speaker: Haroon Rasheed
FORMULAS
19Speaker: Haroon Rasheed
RESULTS● Qb = 13123.8 lbs● Qt = 22800 lbs● Qu = 21602.45 lbs● Qu < Qt Hence O.K.● Qall = 345639 lbs● Elastic Settlement = 0.6”● Elastic settlement is less than 1.5”
20
Speaker: Haroon Rasheed
GSU BREAKERProperties of GSU Breaker
Dimensions
•Length : 92” = 7.6’
•Width : 78” = 6.5’
Weight
•Weight with gas - 11180 lbs.
•Weight less gas - 10910 lbs.
21Speaker: Haroon Rasheed
GSU BREAKERASSUMPTIONS:
● Pressure bulb reaches a depth of 2B (12’)
● The three layers from the depth of 4’ to 16’ are considered to be one sandy layer with a ᶲavg of 34⁰ and ϒavg of 115 psf
22Speaker: Haroon Rasheed
RESULTS● Qb = 15311 lbs● Qt = 22800 lbs● Qu = 21289 lbs● Qu< Qt Hence O.K.● Qall = 745115 lbs● Elastic Settlement = 0.56”● Elastic settlement is less than 1.5”
23Speaker: Haroon Rasheed
Conclusion & Recommendation● Shallow Foundation is the best type of foundation to be considered for
the transformer
● The load of the transformer is less therefore foundations such as pile foundation and mat foundation are not recommended
● Geo form is used as an anticipate to fill the voids between reinforcing bars and a part of foundation as it increases compressive strength and absorbs the vibration of GSU
● For the water storage tank, Pile Foundation is Recommended
24Speaker: Haroon Rasheed
Turbine GSU Transformer &
Breaker
Water Storage Tank
Mat Foundation Shallow Foundation Pile Foundation
References●"Highland Tank - Steel Storage Tanks." Highland
Tank - Steel Storage Tanks. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2015.
●Das, Braja M. Principles of Foundation Engineering, SI, Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning, 2011, Print.
25Speaker: Haroon Rasheed