For the Dazed Final

7/31/2019 For the Dazed Final

1/35

For the Dazed, Confused, and Frustrated Among Us

Extended Version

(Mortgages, Criminal Defense, Etc.)

1. There are many kinds of laws. Laws pertain to many different kinds of

venues.

2. The laws we most often deal with are all statutory Territorial laws

established by the US Congress or the State Legislatures. (Due to the Actof 1871 and various Acts of skullduggery since then, there are no real States

functioning (except those that have been re-inhabited) and Territorial

otherwise known as local law or Roman Civil Law, aka, lex fori is what

we are living under, instead of the Common Law owed to us and guaranteed

by the first organic Constitution for the united States of America. All the

States you deal with everyday are franchises of the US Corporation---

franchises like your local McDonalds burger joint is a franchise of

McDonalds Corporation---and having exactly the same status in law. When

the United States of America acts as a Corporator it lays down any claim

to act with sovereignty and becomes just another corporation. See 22 USC

286(c).

3. There are also several international venues, including Civil Maritime,

International Admiralty, and International Commerce.

4. These international venues derive from the ancient Law Merchant as it was

developed and applied to conduct business internationally at sea and on land.


2/35

2

5. Over many years a body of International Commercial Law has developed,

and it has been codified.

6. This means that the Law has been drafted, argued over, tested, passed into

Law--- several hundred years ago for many of the laws in international

venues---and then it has been administratively interpreted and codified.

That means it has been given to bureaucrats to implement, which they do by

creating definitions and detailing how the Law is to be applied and what it

requires.

7. The Uniform Commercial Code implements International Commercial Law.

8. Individual nations decide whether or not they will adopt the Uniform

Commercial Code and use it for the conduct of business domestically---

meaning at home as well as internationally.

9. The United States of America adopted the Uniform Commercial Code in the

mid-1960s, and ever since, it has set the definitions and standards for

operations that business uses both inside and outside the US States---all 57

of them.

[President Obama was right about there being 57 States---- 50 Domestic

States and 7 Insular States. The Insular States include the District of

Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, etc., and technically, they, not the 50

Domestic States, are recognized as the United States of America, a British

Commonwealth member of the United Nations, thanks to Puerto Rico. The


3/35

3

50 Domestic States are properly identified as The United States of America,

a washed-up, has-been Republic that is merely represented by the United

States of America. Not surprisingly, each entity has a separate charter

known as a Constitution, and these are equally semantically confused.

There is the first, original organic document, The Constitution for the unitedStates of America, and there is the second document known as the

Constitution of the United States of America. On top of these two entities,

theres a giant, horribly managed corporation called the US Corporation,

which is owned by the Vatican and managed by Great Britain, and its By-

Laws are also called a Constitution, only this time it is simply the United

States Constitution. It is this third Constitution that the US Senators and

House Representatives and the US President all take their Oath of Office to--

they are elected Officers of the US Corporation.]

10. Easy Proof 101: The Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the

flag of the United States of America (the seven Insular States) and to the

Republic for which it stands (the 50 Domestic States which the United States

of America represents). Apparently, we are too stupid to represent

ourselves. The treasonous Rump Congress overthrew the national

Republic with the Reconstruction Acts and the 14

th

Amendment followingthe Civil War. An equally treasonous Governors Conference overthrew the

50 State Republics (March 9, 1933) by pledging the credit of their

States and the citizenry thereof as voluntary adjuncts to the bankruptcy of

the United States of America--- a bankruptcy that is still ongoing as the

international bankers seek to wring every penny out of us and establish

bogus claims against our private property in a feeding frenzy of despicable

corruption and greed.

11. At some point, everyone will wake up and notice that neither the Rump

Congress [39th] nor the Conference of Governors had any authority

whatsoever to do what they did in our names. At some point also, we will

all notice that the international bankers are rapingus. It may occur to some


4/35

4

sharp tool in the American Shed to say, Hey, wait a minute, I, personally,

never heard this story. None of these claims against my person, my credit,

and my private property were ever disclosed or authorized by ME. I didnt

pledge my credit. I didnt sign up to be a bond slave for a Vatican-owned

corporation.

12. Ah, but, back to the UCC and Tim Turner, and all the confusion

surrounding the UCC-1 Financing Statement that people signed as part of his

Freedom Documents package and fears that signing that and placing a

claim against the Strawman trust sucks people into some terrible

jurisdiction or exposes them to attack: it does NOT.

13. The UCC-1 and the UCC in general are not the problem.

14. President Turner was exactly right about the UCC-1. You, the living,

breathing man or woman (who are always describedin Law in the form of,

for example, Mary Ann of the Family Boswell , nevernamed) will---once

you recoup your legal standing and your true political status--- need to file a

UCC-1 Financing Statement against the so-called Strawman. President

Turner just got things a little out of order and made an honest mistake. He

assumed that the debts of the Strawman are the same as the legitimate

debts people have---and they are not. As a result, he had people sign aSecurity Agreement agreeing to accept and be responsible for the debts of

the Strawman---and that is where the real rub is. Everyone who signed

needs to rescind their signature and agreement on that document pronto.


5/35

5

15. What is the mysterious Strawman? Its called an Inferior Roman Trust,

or a cestui que vie trust, or, whats popular with the lawyers: a constructive

estate trust----sounds better----but they all mean the same thing: youve

been declared legally dead, and your estate---your home, land, bank

accounts, etc., have all been transferred to the ownership of theStrawman---aka, federal franchise cestui que vie trust, aka, constructive

estate trust. HE is always named using Capitis Dominutio Maxima

conventions--- all capital letters----and as any legal style manual will reveal,

these conventions are only used to name (1) corporate entities, and (2) dead

people. Really dead people.

MARY ANN BOSWELL is presumed to be the beneficiary and heir ofMary Ann Boswell, which is the True Trust Name of Mary Ann of the

Family Boswell. See? Thats why its an Inferior trust--- inferior to your

True Trust---and infinitely inferior to Mary Ann of the Family Boswell, who

is a sovereign and peaceful inhabitant of the Several Domestic States, a

natural person whose political status is described as that of an American

State National, and who is not a citizen or a resident at all, and who is,

moreover, owed the Common Law and every protection of the organic

Constitution for the united States of America by the elected Trustees, whoare otherwise acting in flagrant Breach of Trust.

16. How has Mary Ann of the Family Boswell, a sovereign celebrated

throughout the world, been reduced to peonage? Its important to

understand how the agents of the United States of America and the US

Corporation have contrived to do this to you.

Step One--- they importune a Certificate of Live Birth from your Mother

under conditions of non-disclosure, which she unwittingly signs merely

as an Informant---thereby also unwittingly creating a trust, handing

legal title toyou to the government, and reducing you to the status of a


6/35

6

ward of the State. This, and Marriage Licenses is the way that the

government gains control of such issues as custody, child support

payments, required vaccinations and so forth----the parents have in

ignorance granted the state trusteeship over their child.

Step Two. The state wastes no time in registering the child as a US

vessel in the Merchant Marine Service, and offering securities, bonds,

based on the value of the vessel. The banks buy these bonds known as

CUSPD or CUSIP (depending on who is selling them) bonds, thus

acquiring a financial interest in the vessel.

Step Three. The teenager is importuned to apply for a Social Security

Number, told that this is a requirement of employment (only federal

employment, it turns out) and that they cant be employed or have a job

or earn a living without one. So they are coerced and apply under duress.

The government misrepresents this as a voluntary act, and claims that

the teenager has agreed to enter federal jurisdiction and accept US

citizenship in exchange for the benefit of Social Security.

***Today, the state tries to make things easy on itself by forcing the

Mother to sign both the Certificate of Live Birth AND an application for

a Social Security Number for her child. They dont want people to

have any say in their own lives and prey upon women still groggy from

childbirth and little babies. Thats the ilk of people you are dealing

with.***

Step Four. When the Social Security Number is issued, the US vessel

disappears like magic---its corpus is rolled over into the newly created

cestui que vie trust, and vessel is presumed lost at sea.


7/35

7

This all sounds insane until you realize that the principle jurisdiction that

the federal government has is jurisdiction over navigable inland waters

and on the high seas; all these ridiculous pretenses about you being a

US vessel are used to establish federal jurisdiction over you and allow

the legal presumption that you are (at any given time and at theirconvenience) an international vessel in Civil Maritime jurisdiction or a

national vessel in International Admiralty jurisdiction. Either way, its

a venally self-interested semantic deceit on the part of the government

that is easy to refute once you realize this whole web of deceit exists.

Step Five. All these games mean that the bonds the bankers bought

(which were secured by the US vessel ) are suddenly withoutbacking, so the bankers go to court and establish a maritime salvage lien

against the estate of the jolly MARY ANN BOSWELL (vessels are

named with all caps italicized) and have her declared dead, presumed

lost at sea.

This step of this vicious charade destroys your legal standing. From the

standpoint of the courts from then on, you are a ghost. You cannot beheard in a court of law. The court has to interpret you as someone or

something other than Mary Ann Boswell---for instance, as the

Master of the missing vessel, or as the Withholding Agent of the

cestui que vie trust.

Please note: The federal trust is a tax payer. You are not. In these and in

all other federal statutory actions taken---mortgage suits, IRS claims, etc.,

the plaintiff suing you will in fact name the federal cestui que vie trust,

because the trust owns everything you think you own. The federal trust

has been presumed to be your beneficiary and has claimed title to all your

property. No point in suing you, because you dont own anything.


8/35

8

Unfortunately, the trust appears to have the same name as you---except

for being in capital letters, so acting in good faith and ignorance, living

people answer the complaint raised against the federal trust, and that

allows the court to presume that you, the living man or woman, are

acting in a collective entity agreement and that you are offering to bethe primary party responsible for the federal trusts debts, etc. This

particular doctrine arises from Braswell v. United States, and results in

what the courts call the Collective Entity or sometimes, Collective

Agency Rule.

While you are rebutting all the other nonsense these monsters have

alleged about you, be sure to state that you do not act as a collectiveentity with any corporate entity and you do not consent to the

transaction of a security interest. That is, you are not responsible for the

federal trusts debts and you dont agree to let the court steal your

money.

When your original given name loses legal standing as a result of

being declared dead, presumed lost at sea, you lose your ability totake any action at law and make it stick: you are dead, and until

you overcome that judgment by establishing that you are alive,

nothing that you can say or do holds water. You are helpless, utterly

at the mercy of the court---precisely where the lawyers and

politicians and bankers want you to be.

17. How, then, do you re-establish that you are alive? You use an ancient legal

document approved by the Roman Catholic Church under Ecclesiastical

Law, known as an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll which is sealed in blood with

your thumbprint---no signature at all, and you back it up with a Statement of

Identity signed and sealed (thumbprint in red ink) by two Witnesses attesting


9/35

9

that they know you and your family and that you are a person of good

standing and character.

These two documents provide irrefutable proof that Mary Ann of the

Family Boswell is still alive---and they restore your standing at Law,

meaning that you can now go forward and kick legal rump and take all the

other actions you need to take to restore your political status and reclaim

your property. Assuming that you use the versions of the documents

included with this message, the EDP will also demand (1) dissolution of the

cestui que vie trusts entered in your name, (2) recognition of your standing as

the sole and primary beneficiary of these trusts, (3) recognition of the

Republic and the Common Law government you are owed.

18.How do you restore your political status? ---by invoking the Universal

Right of Self-Declaration, a right guaranteed by UN treaties the United

States of America signed in a weak moment in 1948.

First Step. You rescind any and all signatures and statements seeming toaccept or claim US citizenship or otherwise seeming to bind you to

contracts with the US Corporation, ab initio, for fraud and non-disclosure.

File a simple Affidavit stating this, signed by two Witnesses in the

Miscellaneous File of the local Recorders Office and send copies via

Certified Return Receipt Requested US Mail to the US Secretary of State,

US Secretary of the Treasury, State Governor, State Secretary of State, State

Attorney General, and any other office you have to deal with.

[There have been elaborate concerns about using the US Postal Service in

the past, claims that only Registered Mail are private, etc., but a public

service offered by a private company under conditions of monopoly is a gift

and you can do what you like with a gift.]


10/35

10

Save the receipts from the mailing, collect the return cards, and put the

evidence that you have given Notice in a safe place. At the same time by the

same process, you should prepare and have witnessed and give Notice of aDeclaration of Exile formally exiting the United States of America and its

jurisdiction, and a Declaration of Residency placing your True Trust (not

you the living man or woman, but your True Trust Mary Ann Boswell)

in original jurisdiction on the land of The United States of America.

19. If you want to be sure that no issue of insufficient Notice can be raised, run

a small ad three times in the Legal Notices section of the local paper(s),

stating that you are rescinding all signatures on all statements and contracts

or presumed contracts ever entered into with the United States of America,

the US Corporation, or any of their corporate municipal franchises known as

States, for fraud and non-disclosure, that you have exiled from the United

States of America, and Declared the permanent residency of your True Trust

in original jurisdiction on the land of The United States of America.

[****Living people, the actual men and women who are American State

Nationals, dont reside ---they inhabit the land.****]

That gets rid of any basis for a court to presume that the numerous adhesion

contracts youve unwittingly entered into are valid contracts, and gives you a

basis to prove that you have exiled from federal jurisdiction; it also places

your True Trust safely and officially in original jurisdiction, where the rats

cannot lay claim to it again or presume maritime jurisdictions apply.

20.At the same time, include a formal Affidavit to the effect that you were

misinformed and coerced into signing up for a Social Security Number and

falsely told that it was a general condition of employment without which you


11/35

11

could not work and earn a living. Also state that that misapprehension was

the motivation for your action and that you did not willingly seek or consider

participation in Social Security any benefit, but rather that you considered it

an onerous extra tax that sopped up nearly 8% of your gross income (the

actual tax is nearly 16%, 8% from you, 8% from your employer.) andremoved it from you without any payment of interest to you. This destroys

the legal presumption that you voluntarily sought benefit and received the

benefits of this program in consideration for signing away your

Constitutional rights, your natural political status, and all your private

property in an undisclosed agreement to accept US citizenship and

allow ownership of your property to be transferred to the federal cestui

que vie trusts as a result.

21. Make no mistake, youve been financially and legally defrauded,

dispossessed, demeaned, sacked, burned, raped, and hung out on the dung

pile to dry by the United States of America and the US Corporation.

Sustained outrage and effort is called for to set your own house in order, and

lay claim to your own property.

22. How? Well, youve been the victim of a reverse trust scheme. It started

when your Mother unwittingly signed you over to the tender mercies of the

government. She was the donor creating the trust. The government or

rather, the entity representing the government that you are actually owed,

was the trustee. You were the beneficiary. But, the rats connived to turn

things around and reverse things--- thanks to their undisclosed contracts

and semantic deceits and your own ignorance, you were deemed to have

voluntarily donated your credit, your private property, your labor and

everything else to the federal trusts created using your name, and the

government and the governments creditors (banks) named themselves the

happy beneficiaries of all your voluntary goodwill and largesse. So,

Bubba, now, having reclaimed your legal standing and your rightful political

status, its time for you to do unto them what they have done to you.


12/35

12

23. Your True Trust, Mary Ann Boswell, outguns their puny and literally

inferior franchise trust. By Canon of Law #2056, any judge or trustee or

administrator who doesnt IMMEDIATELY dissolve the cestui que vie trustsupon your Claim of Life and demand, is guilty of willful crime. And, as

everything that ought to have been done, must appear as if having been

done---it really doesnt matter whether they do anything at all. Youve

proven your competence and standing and made the demand by presenting

them with a properly worded Ecclesiastical Deed Poll. They are stuck,

skewered on their own Rules of Court and principles of Law. From now on,

any claim they make is as dead at Law as you were when you began this

process.

24.Just to drive the proverbial knife in and twist it, follow up the Ecclesiastical

Deed Poll with full Due Process----that means, you send them a follow up

Ecclesiastical Notice of Dishonor if they dont reply and confirm that they

have dissolved the Inferior Trusts, give them 10 more days to reply, then

send them an Ecclesiastical Notice of Protest for Non-Acceptance---astatement noting that they still havent replied and giving them another ten

days, and after that, send them a notice of formal Judgment, stating that all

elements of the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll (which includes demand to dissolve

the federal trusts and return the property to the True Trust and which names

the living man or woman as the Beneficiary) have been acquiesced to by all

parties concerned and all right and claim to the property of MARY ANN

BOSWELL is now transferred to the True Trust Mary Ann Boswell.

25.Take this Judgment to the local Recorders Office and claim over the

franchise trusts title to your property, by providing a copy of the EDP,

Dishonor, Non-Acceptance, and Judgment, along with an Affidavit signed

by two Witnesses, stating that the property described, blah, blah, blah, is


13/35

13

held by Mary Ann Boswell in True Trust in original jurisdiction on the land

without encumbrance, claim, or tenancy agreement of any kind.

26. This is just the beginning. It took them the better part of 80 years to lay all

these traps and make all these bogus claims. Expect that it is going to take

you some time to get your personal house in order and more time to clean

the rats out of Washington--- but know this: you have everything you need,

all the power, and all the basic insight necessary---to take these con artists

and wring them dry. You can, and you must, make the Law your friend and

familiar, and use it. Dont think that you can hire a lawyer to do it for you.

All lawyers are members of the Bar Association and officers of the courts;

they are part of the problem, not the solution.

27. Finally getting back to Tim Turner and the whole UCC-1 issue. You can

see now why filing the UCC-1 without first having re-established legal

standing as a living man or woman would be a useless gesture; TT had

things a bit out of order, but was headed in the right direction. You can also,

hopefully see that you are an inhabitant of, literally, a different country than

the United States of America. You are an American State National living in

a Domestic State. They are all US citizens living like parasites on the land

of the Domestic States. US citizens are actually, literally, legally--

foreigners on our turf. So it makes sense that when you file a claim against

a US citizen (the corporate franchise cestui que vie trust that has been

abusing your NAME is considered a person and a US citizen under the

Diversity of Citizenship Clause ---Section 1332(c) of Title 28 of Federal

Code) you have to file an internationally viable claim, a UCC-1, andadvance your status as a Secured Third Party Creditor, but not just any

secured Third Party----you are the PRIMARY Beneficiary, and you enjoy

the first and unique rights of salvage and unassailable claim to everything

that has been stolen from you.


14/35

14

28. Another thing that TT has right---- dont get mad. Get even. Bind together

and kick these rotten lawyers and undeclared Foreign Agents and crooked

bankers right off the Continental Shelf. Keep at it, day after day, and yearafter year. Take what youve learned and for Gods sake, stop paying

Federal Income Taxes. As the name should suggest, you have no Federal

income, and as you are not in a collective entity relationship with the

Strawman trust operated by the Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico,

you are not its Withholding Agent. You are not a Taxpayer and you

never were. You, the living man or woman, are totally, absolutely EXEMPT

from LEVY, and you always have been.

Just stop filing, and if the IRS comes around, give that agent your best Clint

Eastwood stare, and say, I am not a taxpayer. I am not a US citizen. I

have no federal income. I do not act as a withholding agent for any US

citizen living in Puerto Rico or elsewhere. I am not in a collective entity

relationship with any federal trust or any other legal fiction of any kind. I

have never and will never be responsible for importing any revenue to

Puerto Rico. And you are standing on posted private property harassing

someone you have no right to even speak to.

If they keep at it, insist that they put everything they want to say in writing,

and answer everything they ask by asking them pointed questions sent by

Certified Return Receipt Requested Mail. Never ignore anything the IRS

sends you, always answer----with pointed questions regarding their

jurisdiction and definitions of income and taxpayer, etc. Never take

their suggestions. Never admit or allow any suggestion that you are ataxpayer or a client of the IRS.

[One of their favorite tricks is to send people exit surveys asking them to

rate the service they have received from the IRS---if the living man or


15/35

15

woman answers by filling out the survey, they have just admitted to being a

client of the IRS. If they dont return an answer and round file the survey,

they are in dishonor because they have ignored an offer of exchange. The

correct response is to send back a note (via Certified Mail, Return Receipt

Requested) informing them that you arent a client of the Internal RevenueService, and would they please remove your name from their list?

Do you see how sneaky and duplicitous these people are? You can take

nothing for granted. Even a postcard sent to you by an agent on vacation

in Hawaii has to be responded to or you can be accused of evasion. You

must carefully consider every correspondence you receive from them and

never, ever agree to talk to them. Always insist that everything be addressedto you in writing and use your wits to assess their every move. If you get

called in on a subpoena spend the hundred bucks to take along a professional

recording secretary to record and transcribe every word of the conversation.

Its worth it just to watch the agents squirm. You have no reason to talk to

them and they have no reason to talk to you. Make it stick, and if they ask

you anything you dont want to answer or that you are unsure of how to

answer, do not hesitate to take the protection of the 5th Amendment. It is not

an admission of guilt.

If they subpoena your financial records from the banks, etc., realize that they

already have access to this information anyway, because they work for the

banks as a collection agency.

(See Title 5 of the Federal Code and observe that the Secretary of the

Treasury (of Puerto Rico) was named by the Creditors (banks) as their

Bankruptcy Trustee as part of the ongoing fraudulently imposed

bankruptcy of The United States of America. Timothy Geithner is the

Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico. The rats just conveniently leave off


16/35

16

the of Puerto Rico part of it, or youd figure out the con and roast them,

tails and all.)

Let them look all they like at your financial records. You have nothing to

hide. As American State National living and working exclusively in one of

the Domestic States, you operate exclusively in the private sector and your

earnings are legally defined as property----private property, not income.

Only corporate entities accrue income. Living people accrue property.

Coppage v. Kansas is one of the key US Supreme Court cases that discusses

this fine point.

Never send a Petition to the US Tax Court. THINK, people! Submitting a

petition grants them jurisdiction where they have NONE otherwise. Stand

on your little flat feet and send the Tax Court a reply, telling them you are an

American State National, not a taxpayer, not responsible for any excise taxes

owed for the privilege of importing revenue to Puerto Rico, that you do not

consent to the transaction of a security interest and that you do not stand

under the courts jurisdiction. Stop feeding the Beast. Just stop. And know

this--- if you dontstop filing and paying, you face a felony and a five yearstint in a federal pen for pretending to be a Withholding Agent when youre

not one--- under penalty of perjury.

Thats why I stopped filing. That was 18 years ago. Nobody can importune

you to sign a false statement under penalty of perjury. If they do, and

continue to do so even after you have told them bluntly that you are not a

taxpayer and not a withholding agent, they have committed several crimes

for which they can be held accountable and indicted---harassment, coercion,

attempted extortion, importuning false witness, and the list goes on.


17/35

17

The federal income tax is an excise tax, specifically, an impost duty,

on the privilege of importing revenue to Puerto Rico.

This is how it works.

When you go into a bank and set up an account, the bank misunderstands

on purpose and sets up an account for the federal franchise cestui que vie

trust instead. Look on your personal checks--- MARY ANN BOSWELL.

Thereafter when you deposit your paycheck in that account, you areunwittingly donating your money to the trust. The federal franchise

literally acquires 100% ownership interest in your money, and being that the

trust is a resident of Puerto Rico, you have imported revenue to Puerto

Rico. As far as the judge can see, and until you rebut it, you are a US

citizen in a collective entity relationship with a federal franchise trust,

acting as a withholding agent, and you are responsible for paying the

impost.

All these years you have been paying them for the privilege of giving

them your money.

Its all bunko and fraud. The bank has unlawfully converted ownership of

your property without your knowledge or consent, and THEY are the ones

responsible for importing your money to Puerto Rico. Ask the IRS agents toshow you your signature on a lawful two-party, wet-ink, in-kind, fully

disclosed contract that provides equitable consideration to you, which gives

the banks permission to shunt your money into an account belonging to a

federal franchise trust located in Puerto Rico?


18/35

18

Hope youve got your Big Boy pants and some heavy duty dung-buster

boots on, because once you get your legal standing and political status issues

sorted out and know the presumption and mechanics of the fraud that has

been practiced against you, all the weapons of the Law are in your hands,

not theirs. Its time to go hunting the banks in their own killing field, time toclean clocks for the IRS bullies, too.

If any of their hoodlum buddies on the bench fail to run and duck, as they

certainly should, impeach the courts jurisdiction. The court cant enforce

any of this hokum against you, because they have no viable jurisdiction.

29.Take the initiative when they come looking for you. Dont be afraid.

Know who you really are. Know your rights. Know the law. Know the

presumptions. These are bullies, crooks, con artists, white collar criminals

and a whole bunch of clueless henchmen who think they are working for the

right government, when they couldnt be more wrong.

30. And here is your ultimate Ace in the Hole: all these things that have beenpracticed against you, all these bogus claims and identities, all these fake,

invalid, undisclosed contracts and relationships that are merely presumed,

etc., etc., etc., ----it is ALL fraud, and fraud vitiates everything. The

presence of fraud, its taint, destroys any and every kind of claim and legal

action. These arrogant excuses for human beings have grown bold and

careless, leaving it very easy to prove fraud, unlawful conversion, and

numerous other crimes they have committed. You could claim fraud about

virtually anything these people say or do, and now that you are clued in, you

will find that you are able to prove it, too. Shout it to the heavens, sing it to

the trees---These false trustees defrauded me!


19/35

19

31. A few words about courts and jurisdictions--- because your real country has

been dismantled and left vacated --- just as Tim Turner told you it was---

there are no courts that hold jurisdiction over you left in this country. None.

The statutory courts only hold jurisdiction over statutory citizens.

You are not a statutory citizen because you are self-evidently not a

corporation or other form of legal fiction. Period. There go all the statutory

laws that you are accustomed to dealing with, right out the window. Poof!

80 million laws and regulations and licenses have just hit the waste bin so

far as being applied to you is concerned.

The ONLY jurisdictions left that exist that legitimately allow you to take

action against or interact whatsoever with the United States of America are

international venues. You can only attack them and they can only attack

you, in international venues and, in international courts. The US District

Courts attempt to use international venues to attack you while putting their

own men over you as judges----a very, very serious conflict of interest that

cannot stand examination.

You can avoid persecution by these duplicitous monsters by (1) pointing out

that there is no valid contract binding you to maritime jurisdictions and (2)

self-evidently, you are not a US vessel acting in any such venue. (Haul

out your handy dandy Ecclesiastical Deed Poll with blood seal. Its pretty

hard for a vessel in the Merchant Marine service to ooze human blood.)

and (3) that the judge receives his paycheck from the United States of

America which is the plaintiff in the case, so that there is no common

ground or level playing field, only a giant improper offer to transact a

security interest, which you, quite correctly refuse to accept and do not

consent to.


20/35

20

Stand there and again, employ your best Clint Eastwood stare. That criminal

on the bench knows what he is doing. He knows you have him by the

incontrovertible throat. He knows that if it gets pushed up the food chain

even one more notch, he is going to lose his job and be disbarred and eat his

own law license for breakfast----not for being dishonest and corrupt, whichhe obviously is----but for being STUPID and pushing issues that he cannot

push.

This same conundrum means that you cannot take them to court in their own

courts, whether they offer an international venue or not. You have to go

OUTSIDE the court system of the United States of America to sue the

United States of America (or its agents) and obtain impartial hearing of theissues. Most of us are content to merely avoid prosecution and get on with

our lives, but if you want to carry the issues forward and prosecute THEM,

please have sense enough to realize that it must be done in international

courts that are not run by the United States of America.

32. If you want to restore the Republic, however, it will take more than just

recognition of your individual lawful political status. It will requirerebutting the false claims that have been made on a national level.

Ask yourself what gave the Governors Conference acting in March of 1933

any authority to pledge the credit of their States anymore than they had

permission to pledge the good faith and credit of the citizenry thereof?

As for the individual, so for the actual States of the Republic that are defined

by metes and bounds on the land---they, too, have been defrauded, and that

must be addressed. For the past 80 years, the States of the Republic have

been subjected as --- voluntary adjuncts----to the still ongoing bankruptcy


21/35

21

of the United States of America, based on the say-so of elected officials who

committed treason.

Look up Louis T. McFadden. Much of what we have won back, much of

what we know, and much of what we can stand to gain back, is because of

the work and words of a single Congressman--- Louis T. McFadden.

The rats defrauded our States in exactly the same way that they have

defrauded us----even using the same terminology. All this is supposedly

voluntary, just like your voluntary payment of federal income taxes and

your voluntary donation of the money in your bank account and yourvoluntary donation of ownership interest in your home.

Is this voluntary? Was it ever? Did the People of the individual States ever

take a vote, a referendum, or plebiscite agreeing to pledge the credit of their

States in payment of debts owed by a foreign entity, the United States of

America? NO. We, the People, werent asked. Some jackdaws in suits who

were selected by the gangs we called political parties sold us down the riverat an afternoon coffee klatsch presided over by Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

No such action or vote of the People was ever recorded, nor asked for. All

these deals were made behind closed doors and hushed up for decades

afterward.

Note the explanation and citations in this recent Petition placed before the

Alaska Supreme Court:


22/35

22

On March 6, 1933 the federal government (Franklin Delano Roosevelt)

got the Conference of Governors to pledge the full faith and credit of the

several States of the Union and their citizenry to the aid of the National

Government, (see pp. 18 - 24 of The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin

Roosevelt, Volume II, The Year Of Crisis, March 6, 1933) for what theyopenly admitted to doing. They also encouraged the President to ask for and

use extra-constitutional powers during the "emergency" that continues to this

day.

This was a completely voluntary action on the part of the Governors.

They acted without granted Authority and without any sufficient material

interest to pledge the full faith and credit of then- 48 States and that of the

States citizenry as credit in behalf of the United States of America.

It was fraud on the face of it.

They individually had no granted Authority to pledge the full faith and

credit of their States, which they did not own, as collateral. Likewise it was

purely fraudulent for the Governors to claim material interest in the privately

held resources of the Citizens of their State.

The Petitioners and their Progenitors never gave their consent to this

action and were for the most part never even made aware of it.

There has sometimes been an assumption that the Governors were

acting under a special law or regulation and that they were entitled to

exercise it in the face of an emergency, but such is not and never has been

the case.

"Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase

granted power or remove or diminish restrictions imposed upon power

granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted IN a period of grave

emergency. Its grants of power to the Federal Government and its limitations

of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency and they

are notaltered by emergency." [Emphasis added] Home Building & Loan

Assoc. v Blaisdell 290 US 426 (1934).


23/35

23

The Governors acting in 1933 and the Respondents, Members of

Congress, acting now have no special or extra powers during an

emergency, declared or undeclared, yet that is what they specifically and

dishonestly claimed in 1933 and what they are continuing to claim as the

excuse for their infringements against The Constitution of the United States ofAmerica today. Likewise the Governors of the 50 States United acting in

1933 had no new, special, different, or greater claim upon the resources of

their States or upon the Citizens of those States as a result of any economic

emergency.

"The Constitution of the United States is a LAW for rulers and people

equally in war and peace, and covers with the shield of its protection ALL

classes of men, at ALL times, and under ALL circumstances. No doctrine,

involving more pernicious consequences, was EVER invented by the wit of

man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great

exigencies of the government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or to

despotism." [Statement of Opinion, U.S. Supreme Court, Annals 1866, in

response to a new class of proposed infringing Reconstruction legislation that

was similarly promoted on the basis national emergency.]

Likewise, powers and property interests that the Governors didnt

possessprior to the emergency did not magically accrue to them as theresult of any emergency, economic or otherwise. Their action pledging the

full faith and credit of the 50 States and their citizenry was not allowed

prior to the bankruptcy and was not made possible because of it. As in all

cases of fraud, the victims were not notified of any such agreement being

made in their behalf, for the simple reason that the Citizens of the now 50

States if allowed to consider their options under conditions of full disclosure,

would never have agreed.

We can safely assert this, because of the tremendously deleteriousresults: (1) loss of national sovereignty, (2) giving the bankers and politicians

access to unlimited and unrestricted credit, (3) gross indebtedness for

unstipulated goods and services now in evidence as a more than $15 trillion

dollar National Debt. No loyal or even rationally self-interested American

ever agreed to this.


24/35

24

Restoring the Republic begins with restoring the legal standing (Claim of

Life provided by the EDP process) and political status (Declaration of Exile

from any jurisdiction held by the United States of America, Declaration ofResidency of the True Trust in original jurisdiction on the land) of each

American State National. Each one must act to dissolve the cestui que vie

trusts associated with their names and reclaim their private property.

After that, two white men over the age of majority who have re-established

their legal standing and political status as American State Nationals must

reclaim the land described by metes and bounds for each State. Local county

and State governments must be reorganized representing each State in the

Republic, and opposition to the national bankruptcy must be entered on the

basis of fraud practiced against the People of the American Domestic States.

[The reason that you cant just create a new national government under the

original Constitutionwhich is what Tim Turner has been trying to do---is

that claim to the land we live on only derives from the States.

Trying to reclaim the federal government without first reclaiming the States

is like grabbing the saddle and bridle without having a horse to ride.

The federal government created by The Constitution has no natural

jurisdiction over the land and is entirely a maritime power. Put another way,

the federal government created by the original Constitution cannotspeak to

land ownership issues like bankruptcy and foreclosure for the States in a

Republic---thats why the Conference of Governors had to be enlisted.

Roosevelt couldnt enter the States into bankruptcy----as voluntary

adjuncts or otherwise.


25/35

25

We must argue that the Conference of Governors didnt have the right to do

it, either.

A Governors role is administrative and executive; he or she works for the

People, who are the real parties of interest, the owners of the States. The

People of the individual States had to be consulted and had to give their

permission to enter bankruptcy. They were not consulted and did not give

their permission. They werent even told.

The Governors Conference acting in 1933 grossly, unforgivably, and

treasonously overstepped any granted authority possessed by the individual

Governors, and what they did not possess individually, they could not claim

collectively. The Governors didnt own their States, just like they didnt

own the good faith and credit of the citizenry of their States. Those things

were not theirs to pledge.

33. A word about the mortgage crisis. Look at your mortgage paperwork

and your land title and deed, etc. Its all in the name of the cestui que vie

trust, all capital letters. No surprises. By now, you know the drill. You were

presumed dead, the federal franchise was presumed to be your beneficiary,

everything you own was transferred to the ownership of the federal

trust.

Okay. With this con job, our friends the bankers advertised home loans.

Acting in good faith, millions of Americans received what they thought

were home loans from lending institutions----but were not loans at all.


26/35

26

The crazy - like a - fox monetary system set up by FDR allows for some

very strange things. One of them is that promissory notes are defined as

legal tender (31 CFR 103.11) and as negotiable instruments (UCC 3-104).

This means that when you, the living man or woman, sign a Promissory

Note, it becomes Actual Cash Value ---legal tender----for the banks.

Stop a moment and realize that your Promissory Note was legal tenderfor

the bankand that discharged the ENTIRE amount of the loanit actually

prepaid the loan that they claimed they gave you.

Banks and other lending institutions are not allowed to loan depositors

money because of the matching provisions under GAAP and they are

prevented from loaning their own money by Federal Reserve rules. They

have no money to lend, until you create it for them. All they do is credityour

deposit and write a check based upon it.

Okay, so they loan you your own money, but they launder it first. How?

Our old friend, the cestui que vie trust.

The banks deposit your promissory note in the trusts account by entering

numbers crediting the account---- creating checkbook money also known

properly as money of account with the flick of a keystroke. The full value

of your promissory note has just been unlawfully converted to the ownership

of the federal trust by the bank, acting without your knowledge or

permission.


27/35

27

The bank now withdraws the money from the federal trusts account by

writing a check based on the money you donated to the federal trust, and

gives it to you, claiming that they-- the bank, has given you a loan.

Thats unlawful conversion of your property and two major frauds before we

even got out of bed.

Always remember that a check is not money. A check is just a way of

transferring money between accounts---in this case, between the cestui que

vie trusts special escrow account, and its normal checking account which

you thinkbelongs to you.

What has actually happened, but which is never disclosed to you, is that

there is no mortgage contract with the supposed lender and there never

was one.

The bank has a totally different role than it advertises: its not a lender at

all.

The Creditoraccording to the bank records---is the federal cestui que vie

trust.

You purportedly borrowed the money from the federal trust.

Lets just ignore the fact that you were also the one who donated all that

money to the federal trust, thanks to the bank shunting your assets into the

trusts account without your knowledge or permission.


28/35

28

The trusts name goes on the title to the home as the owner, as indeed, it is.

The second the promissory note was deposited, the federal cestui que vie

trust owned your house lock, septic, and window. Look up the legal meaningof closing----its literal. When you left the closing table the entire

transaction was done.

However, while they were handling the legitimate details, the bank offered

you a Security Agreement ---- a document that no bank employee signed,

only you. Though it was deceptively worded, the Security Agreement is

an implied trust indenture; someone named with your name agrees to be the

donor and the bank happily agrees to be the beneficiary of a 100% equity

interest in the home---for free, and to receive the security interest as well.

To you, acting on the idea that you have received a loan from the bank,

this demand for equity to secure the loan seems reasonable enough. Its

only when you realize that you haventreceived a loan from the bank that

the alarm sirens go off.

Signing the Security Agreement means that not only do they get a free

equity interest in your home, they can sell the mortgage paper on the home

as a mortgage backed security and profit twice from the same generous

(and undisclosed) gift.

Meantime, back at the ranch, an escrow account is set up in the trusts

name, and month after month, you send in your monthly mortgage

payments plus interest to pay back the federal cestui que vie trust for the

generous loan it gave you. And month after month, the money sits in the

account untouched.


29/35

29

After a period of time stipulated by law, the bank says---What, ho? This

money has been sitting here for a long time. It must be abandoned funds.

So they claim the mortgage payments as abandoned funds and they

pretend that the Beneficiary----the federal cestui que vie trust is

unknown. Well, after all, it lives in Puerto Rico.

So lets line this out for you--- your Promissory Note literally pre-paid the

entire amount of money spent on your home. You gave the bank the

security interest and 100% equity interest in the home for free. And the

bank has been collecting your mortgage payments plus interest as

abandoned funds for umpty-ump years.

What is that? 500% profit, in exchange for a few duplicitous, undisclosed

keystrokes unlawfully converting ownership of your promissory note to the

benefit of a federal cestui que vie trust that you are completely unaware of.

500%, more or less, for setting up a false presumption and otherwise

keeping ones lips zipped.

Lets recap this sordid, bizarre study in fraud most venal:

(1) They falsely advertise home loans and set up false presumptions from

the start. They know that they have no money to loan and wont have

any money to loan until you create it by signing a promissory note.

(2) They keep up the ruse throughout the whole process, consistently

leading you to believe that you are receiving a loanfrom them---calling it

a LOAN and feeding you through their LOAN DEPARTMENT and

talking about your credit rating----which means nothing at all. (3) They


30/35

30

offer you a Security Agreement that they know you will sign under the

false presumptions they set up in steps one and two. (4) They never

disclose their real role. (5) They never disclose the nature of the

transaction. (6) They never disclose the existence of the cestui que vie

trust or its role. (7) They never give you ANYTHING amounting toequitable consideration. (8) They open an account in the name of the

cestui que vie trust and deposit the actual cash value of your promissory

note ---an amount equal to the entire amount of the alleged loan---in

this account belonging to another, separate legal entity without your

knowledge or permission. (9) They never disclose the existence of the

escrow account. If they did, you could send in your monthly mortgage

payment plus interest one day and come get it back out again the next

day.

You think the bank is going to take your home? You think they have a leg

to stand on? You think any judge in his right mind is going to touch this

with a forty foot pole? Not if you stand up and speak knowledgeably to

these issues.

If more people, including judges, knew what these monsters are doing,

theyd never be able to foreclose on a home loan from now until the Second

Coming.

And now that you know, you can not only defend yourself. You can defend

others.

Also---remember that no court the banker rats can access has jurisdiction. If

the judge glazes over and flunked mathematics, just raise your hand and

challenge jurisdiction. You can do it at any time in the proceedings.


31/35

31

Remember that because State courts are federal franchises, they have only

statutory venues and administer only Territorial law. Theres no way they

CAN address you if you stand up and rebut the presumptions of US

citizenship and collective entity relationship with the federal cestui que

vie trusts. US District Courts have international commerce, civil maritime,and international admiralty jurisdictions, but there is no valid maritime

contract binding you to these venues---blow off the berth certificate

signed by your Mother, and no matter what they say or do, what venue they

invoke----they are still receiving their paycheck from the Plaintiff.

Recognize the conflict of interest.

34. Always remember---the NAME is unavoidably the same, because the ratsnamed the federal trust after you, so when the trust is named as the

Defendant in a law suit, you become a Defendant in Error. Dont take the

bait. Look at the name of the entity being charged. See? Its in all capital

letters. Its the trust that is being addressed, not you, the living man or

woman. When you go to court to settle their hash, you say I am here in the

matter of the name of(your name) and you make it clear that you are

not the same as the federal cestui que vie trust and that you do not act as a

collective entity with respect to it, that you do not accept responsibility for itor its debts, and that you are instead the lawful beneficiary of all cestui que

vie trusts operated by any level of government for any reason whatsoever.

This is important not only because you need to rebut and forestall any

presumption that you are in cahoots with this trust, but also because

many of these Puerto Rican-based cestui que vie trusts run by theDepartment of the Treasury (of Puerto Rico) are involved in very, very

unsavory business operations-----distilleries, drug refining operations,

smuggling, arms sales, chemical warfare, prostitution---activities that you

do not want to be involved in at all, and which, if they are allowed to be

associated with you, cast a long shadow over you good character.


32/35

32

Ever wonder why everyone hates the Americans? Its because the child

porn operation down the street in Bolivia and the white slavers in Laos

and the local drug lords in Ecuador are all Americans ---for example,

DOROTHY K. WHITE takes in the profits from a local distillery in

Honduras, and PETER L. JOHNSON receives the profit from a reallynasty mine operation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The real Dorothy K. White is a gentle, kind-hearted grandmother in

Ohio, who lives on a tiny pension, and goes to church every Sunday and

has no idea on this planet that she is involved in rum running. And

Peter L. Johnson is a high school Biology teacher in Lansing, Michigan,

who would never hurt a fly, much less condemn men to slow death fromUranium exposure.

This is what you are dealing with. Criminal cartels of global reach have

found means to enslave you, claim your property, and then use the profit

from this to spawn every kind of graft and cruelty known to man. They

are doing this IN YOUR NAME, or rather in the name of your presumed

beneficiary---the federal franchise trust---and they are generouslyblaming it all on you.

The Department of the Treasury (of Puerto) which runs this whole

nightmare keeps an IRS Master File on every NAME in their system.

Some of us have in years past used legal means to gain access to our

files and have seen the kinds of things weve been up to. It isnt pretty:

drugs, alcohol, tobacco, human slavery, prostitution, smuggling,

extortion rackets, gambling, arms dealing.

This is why decent people from here to Bangkok hate Americans.


33/35

33

Take home message---its not just your butt in this wringer. Millions of

innocent people worldwide are being sacrificed, impoverished, and

endangered because you havent kept control of your government.

35. How can we help President Turner? The same way we can help a lot of

other people. First, share the basic information. The federales have no

viable jurisdiction if he really digs his heels in. And, as President of the

Republic, he can invoke the International Court--- right after he observes

that the judge is being paid by the Plaintiff.

Second, we point out that when there are criminal charges involving an

American State National, the burden on the federales is heavy indeed.

There are no thought crimes and no statutory crimes and no victimless

crimes that can be applied against an American State National. For

example, Tim Turner never needed a passport from the United States of

America to travel anywhere and still doesnt. If there was an improper act

due to misunderstanding on his part, who or what caused that

misunderstanding? The de facto government purposefully misinforms

people, making them think that they are all US citizens and that they all

need a US Passport. They misinformed Tim along with everyone else. He

should be able to identify what publications or informants misinformed

him about US Passports and grill them.

Who caused the problem? What redress is there? Who is injured? How?

Wheres the proof? Wheres the valid jurisdiction?


34/35

34

State Nationals have the original apparatus of the nation to provide their

passports--- glue a passport sized picture of yourself to a sturdy piece of

paper and beside the photo, a drop of your blood and your thumbprint and

write a valid home mailing address and the date; go down to the Post

Office, have two Witnesses with you and in front of the local Postmasterhave them sign the paper under a brief statement affirming that this is you

and that you are a person of known family and good character, born in blah-

blah Domestic State of the Union. Have the Postmaster witness this as the

third person, affix Registered Letter Postage, and cancel the stamp for you.

Thats it. Theres your passport, good to travel anywhere in the world.

Passports are issued by the Post Office for a reason---and it doesnt matter

what frou-frou-rah forms and seals the United States of America requires----

all that matters is that you, an American State National meet therequirements thatyourcountry, The United States of America.

That, and the fact that the IRS is blowing smoke in its accusation of him,

cuts the charges down to what?

The Feds have to dig up a corpus delecti and allege and then prove realspecific injury to someone.

So if Tim Turner hasnt harmed anyone, they are going to be hard pressed.

Someone, a live man or woman, has to stand up and accuse him of injuring

them under penalty of perjury and full commercial liability, and thanks toTrinsey v. Pagliaro, the accuser cannot be an attorney acting in behalf of an

agency. So lets see who is stupid enough to do that in the DOJ.


35/35

35

In addition to establishing a valid complaining party, they have to prove

standing, too. The injury has to be caused directly and specifically by Tim

Turner and not the result of fraud or acts committed by identifiable Third

Parties. The injury has to be redress-able. If the court cant deliver redress

to the injured party, the court is stuck.

A lot of the legal eagles out there forget the basics, and the basics often offer

the best, most incontrovertible defense. Tim knows this. Remind him. And

keep working toward what we all know has to be done.