Upload
others
View
57
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PWG Quality and Training 2019
ISCN 2020 Ros Hastings
Consultant GenQA,
ISCN Standing Committee
Oxford University Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust NHS Lothian, Edinburgh
Collaboration between CEQAS and UK NEQAS for Molecular Genetics
Member of consortium
PWG Quality Issues and Training 2019
ISCN - Common misconceptions
and frequent errors
Ros Hastings GenQA
Common Misconceptions
No need to read the whole book
Only look at section with type of abnormality
No logic in the ISCN nomenclature
It is helpful to describe polymorphism in ISCN
pter and qter can be used to describe terminal bands
Normal FISH results cannot be reported in one string
Can if same number of interphase cells analysed from
different hybridisations. Cannot for abnormals.
There are basic rules in ISCN
Basic ISCN Rules
There are basic rules in ISCN
Describe abnormality from pter to qter (no
exceptions in ISCN 2020)
Cell numbers only given for mosaics and clones
Chromosome number order – lowest to highest
Numerical followed by structural aberrations in
chromosomal order
Structural aberrations listed alphabetically
FISH the numerator is the number of abnormal cells, the
denominator is the total of number of cells (12/50).
FISH – only abnormal cells lines same probe, list each
Contigs must either be given in full in ISCN or text
Normal controls not given in ISCN (text only)
Basic ISCN Rules - 2
Can combine short and detailed form of ISCN
When multiple techniques and mosaic – G-banding
first; then FISH, then array, then seq (each separated
by a full stop)
Can list on separate lines but must have a ‘.’ after
each line
For arrays [0.6] and 2~3 are required – either option
in ISCN
rsa ISCN is platform agnostic
rsa- If nucleotides positions are available they should
be included. If not the kit name is given.
Common Errors - 1
Mixing interphase and metaphase FISH
Normals x2 for both
Structurally normal for metaphase FISH x2
Structurally abnormal metaphase FISH - only describe
the derivative chromosome
++/+/- etc for signal pattern
Abnormal interphase FISH - x3 or x1 etc
For breakapart and fusion probes describe the signal
pattern first
Common Errors - 2
Inappropriate use of ‘rec’
Not using ‘der’ when required
A recombinant is a structurally rearranged
chromosome with a new segmental composition
resulting from meiotic crossing over
Derivative chromosomes are products of the original
rearrangement and segregate without further changes
‘add’ can be used when the additional material is of
unknown origin but this can be misleading as there may
be loss of material. ‘der’ is a better term
Common Errors - 3
When do you change the breakpoints?
When FISH or array extend the breakpoints from G-
banding
Optional whether or not repeat breakpoints in the FISH
ISCN if the same as the G-banded ISCN
46,XY,t(4;11)(q21;q23)[6]/47,XY,+der(4)t(4;11),t(4;11)[8].ish
der(4)(MLL+;MLL-)
or
46,XY,t(4;11)(q21;q23)[6]/47,XY,+der(4)t(4;11),t(4;11)[8].ish
der(4)t(4;11)(q21;q23)(MLL+;MLL-)
Common Errors - 4
Random losses vs composite karyotype
42,XX,-2,-16,-21,-22 random losses not clonal don’t include
44,XX,-1,-7,+8,-11
44,XX,-7,+8,-12,-13
43,XX,-7,-18,-20
46,XX,-7,+8
43~46,XX,-7,+8[cp4]
Clone definition: Loss - 3 cells ; Gain- 2 cells
Common Errors - 5
Sequencing has two lines
Use both when know the type of rearrangement
Use HGVS only when cannot deduce rearrangement
e.g. ins or inv or marker
seq[GrCh37] dup(8)(q24.21q24.21)
chr8:128746677_128749160dup
Collaboration between CEQAS and UK NEQAS for Molecular Genetics
Member of consortium
PWG Quality Issues and Training 2019
ISCN 2020
ISCN committee
Standing committee Chair- Jean McGowan- Jordan (CAN)
Cynthia Morton (USA)
Laura Conlin (USA)
Ros Hastings (UK)
Nils Mandahl (SE)
Sarah Moore (AUS)
Jin-Yeong Han (SKR)
Johann Dunnen (NL) - HGVS
Karger Press
2020 version – major revision
Book and online
ISCN 2020 - Karger
Major review
222 suggestions – 4 days
Sequence chapter- more examples
rsa chapter - more examples
Section 13.6 CGH chapter to be removed
Section 8.4 UPD put under array
Polar Body ISCN
Correction of few errors in ISCN 2016
Further clarification of text where needed
Consistency
Online version proposed plus a training module - Karger
Karyotyping FISH Array rsa seq
XX/XY first first last last
last
pter to qter ± + + + +
Cell numbers ± ± - - -
Mosaicism + + 2~3 or
ratio
2~3 -
Genome build - - + + +
ISCN 2016 - inconsistencies
ISCN 2020 – proposed changes
Basic rules at front of book
Sex chromosomes will be reported first for all techniques
Describe abnormality from pter to qter for all techniques so
consistent with ‘arr’ and ‘seq’ nomenclature
Nucleotides can be separated by commas but not full stops
When an unbalanced derivative is inherited from a
balanced rearrangement in the parent ‘dmat’ and ‘dpat’ will
be used as mat or pat implies the parent is unbalanced
Abnormal example of ‘endo’ will be given
Specify which HGVS version being used for ‘seq’
nomenclature
More p-arm examples
Report what you see
Collaboration between CEQAS and UK NEQAS for Molecular Genetics
Member of consortium
PWG Quality Issues and Training 2019
ISCN – Case scenarios
Ros Hastings GenQA
Which is correct?
46,XX,+21,i(21)(q10)
or
46,XX,+21,der(21;21)(q10;q10)
Case 1
Which is correct?
46,XX,+21,i(21)(q10) – for isochromosomes you do not have
+21. Different mechanism for a ‘der’.
or
46,XX,+21,der(21;21)(q10;q10) Should use der unless proven it is an iso
Case 1
Which is correct?
46,XY,add(5)(q31).ish
der(5)del(5)(q11.2q31)ins(5;?)(q32;??)(FISH loci)
or
46,XY,add(5)(q31).ish
der(5)del(5)(q11.2q31)ins(5;?)(q32;?)(FISH loci)
Case 2
Which is correct?
46,XY,add(5)(q31).ish
der(5)del(5)(q11.2q31)ins(5;?)(q32;??)(FISH loci)
or
46,XY,add(5)(q31).ish
der(5)del(5)(q11.2q31)ins(5;?)(q32;?)(FISH loci)
Case 2
Translocation between 5q and 9p where the translocated 5 also had deletion
of the q arm from the breakpoint of the translocation.
Which is correct?
46,XX,der(5)del(5)(q21q34)t(5;9)(q35;p13),der(9)t(5;9) or
46,XX,t(5;9)(q35;p13)del(5)(q21q34)
Case 3
Translocation between 5q and 9p where the translocated 5 also had deletion
of the q arm from the breakpoint of the translocation.
Which is correct?
46,XX,der(5)del(5)(q21q34)t(5;9)(q35;p13),der(9)t(5;9) or
46,XX,t(5;9)(q35;p13)del(5)(q21q34)
Case 3
Triple colour probe MECOM rearrangements showing 1RGA 1RG 1GA due to t(2;3). MECOM is split.
Which is correct?
nuc ish(GOLIM4x2,MECOMx3,MYNNx2)(GOLIM4 con
MECOM sep MECOM con MYNNx1)[100]
nuc ish(GOLIM4,MECOM,MYNN)x2(5’MECOM sep
3’MECOMx1)[100] or
Case 4
Triple colour probe MECOM rearrangements showing 1RGA 1RG 1GA due to t(2;3)
Which is correct?
nuc ish(GOLIM4x2,MECOMx3,MYNNx2)(GOLIM4 con
MECOM sep MECOM con MYNNx1)[100]
nuc ish(GOLIM4,MECOM,MYNN)x2(5’MECOM sep
3’MECOMx1)[100] or
Case 4
Which is correct?
47,XY,+dic(15;15)(q11.1;q11.1).ish
dic(15;15)(D15Z1++,D15Z4++,SNRPN-)
or
47,XY,+dic(15;15)(q11.1;q11.1).ish
dic(15;15)(D15Z1+,D15Z4+,SNRPN-;SNRPN-,D15Z4+,D15Z1+)
Case 5
Which is correct?
47,XY,+dic(15;15)(q11.1;q11.1).ish
dic(15;15)(D15Z1++,D15Z4++,SNRPN-)
or
47,XY,+dic(15;15)(q11.1;q11.1).ish
dic(15;15)(D15Z1+,D15Z4+,SNRPN-;SNRPN-,D15Z4+,D15Z1+)
Case 5
Which is correct?
47,XY,+der(4)t(4;11)(q21;q23),t(4;11)[8]/46,XY,t(4;11)[6]
or
46,XY,t(4;11)(q21;q23)[6]/47,XY,+der(4)t(4;11),t(4;11)[8]
Case 6
Which is correct?
47,XY,+der(4)t(4;11)(q21;q23),t(4;11)[8]/46,XY,t(4;11)[6]
or
46,XY,t(4;11)(q21;q23)[6]/47,XY,+der(4)t(4;11),t(4;11)[8] Stem line goes first not largest clone
Case 6
Which is correct?
47,XY,+der(4)t(4;11)(q21;q23),t(4;11)[8]/48,sl,+19[2]
or
47,XY,+t(4;11)(q21;q23),der(4)(4;11)[8]/48,sl,+19[2]
Case 6a
Which is correct?
47,XY,+der(4)t(4;11)(q21;q23),t(4;11)[8]/48,sl,+19[2] der goes before t if no t(4;11) stem cell clone
or
47,XY,+t(4;11)(q21;q23),der(4)(4;11)[8]/48,sl,+19[2]
Case 6a
Which is correct?
rsa(13)x2,(18)x3,(21)x2
or
rsa(18)x3,(13,21)x2
Case 7
Which is correct?
rsa(13)x2,(18)x3,(21)x2
ISCN 2020: rsa(X,13)x2,(18)x3,(21)x2 or
rsa(X,Y)x1,(13)x2,(18)x3,(21)x2
or
rsa(18)x3,(13,21)x2
Case 7
Which is correct?
45,X[5]/46,X,i(Y)(p10)[5]/46,XY[5].ish i(Y)(SRY-)
or
45,X[5]/46,X,i(Y)(p10)[5].ish i(Y)(SRY-)/46,XY[5]
Case 8
Which is correct?
45,X[5]/46,X,i(Y)(p10)[5]/46,XY[5].ish i(Y)(SRY-)
or
45,X[5]/46,X,i(Y)(p10)[5].ish i(Y)(SRY-)/46,XY[5]
Case 8
Collaboration between CEQAS and UK NEQAS for Molecular Genetics
Member of consortium
PWG Quality Issues and Training 2019
Q & A
Ros Hastings GenQA