Upload
ngodat
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION: CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURE AND THE HIDDEN POTENTIAL OF SOIL
A REPORT TO THE G20 AGRICULTURE DEPUTIESFEBRUARY 2018
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
with inputs from
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) The World Bank Group World Trade Organization (WTO)
iii
The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or OECD in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or of OECD or its member countries.
©FAO and OECD,2018
FAOencouragestheuse,reproductionanddisseminationofmaterialinthisinformationproduct.Exceptwhereotherwiseindicated,materialmaybecopied,downloadedandprintedforprivatestudy,researchandteachingpurposes,orforuseinnon-commercialproductsorservices,providedthatappropriateacknowledgementofFAOasthesourceandcopyrightholderisgivenandthatFAO’sendorsementofusers’views, productsorservices isnot implied inanyway.
Allrequestsfortranslationandadaptationrights,andforresaleandothercommercialuserightsshouldbemadeviawww.fao.org/contact-us/[email protected].
FAOinformationproductsareavailableontheFAOwebsite(www.fao.org/publications)[email protected].
v
1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1
2. TRENDS AND CHALLENGES.................................................................................................................................. 1
2.1. FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.2. DEMAND FOR FOOD ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3. CLIMATE CHANGE ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2.4. SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH ............................................................................................. 10
Increasing agricultural production sustainably ................................................................................................... 11 Innovation and R&D in food and agriculture ...................................................................................................... 12 Investment and enhancing international exchange on R&D and innovation ........................................................ 14
2.5. TRADE AND TRANSPARENCY IN FOOD MARKETS ...................................................................................................... 15 Global trends in market demand have reduced pressures on prices .................................................................... 16
3. SOILS: A HIDDEN POTENTIAL IF WELL MANAGED .............................................................................................. 19
3.1. STATUS OF GLOBAL SOILS ................................................................................................................................. 19 Soil erosion ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 Soil organic carbon (SOC) loss ............................................................................................................................ 21 Nutrient imbalance ............................................................................................................................................ 21
3.2. IMPACTS OF SOIL DEGRADATION ........................................................................................................................ 23 3.3. SUSTAINABLE SOIL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ........................................................................................................ 24 3.4. ROLE OF INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) ................................................................................. 28 3.5. ONGOING COLLECTIVE RESPONSES AND INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE ........................................................................ 29
Global Soil Partnership ...................................................................................................................................... 29 The Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils ................................................................................................. 30 The revised World Soil Charter ........................................................................................................................... 30 The Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management ............................................................................... 30 The Global Symposium on Soil Organic Carbon................................................................................................... 31 4/1000 initiative: Soils for Food Security and Climate ......................................................................................... 31 Global Symposium on Soil Pollution ................................................................................................................... 32
3.6. WAY FORWARD ............................................................................................................................................. 33 3.7. RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 33
vi
Thisreport,preparedbyFAOandtheOECDwithinputsfromIFPRI,IFAD,theWorldBankandWTO,hasbeensubmittedtotheG20PresidencyoftheRepublicofArgentinainresponsetothePresidency’srequestforinformationonfuturetrendsandchallengesfacedbyglobalagriculture,withaspecialfocusontheroleofsoilsinpromotingfoodsecurityandthemeasuresthatcouldbeundertakentofacilitatesustainablesoilmanagement.
February2018
1
Introduction Today,agriculturefacesatriplechallenge.Theproductionofsafeandnutritiousfoodwillneed
toincreasetomeetthegrowingdemandandensurefoodsecurityforall.Thesectorhastogeneratejobsandincomesandcontributetopovertyeradicationandruraleconomicgrowth.Furthermore,ithasamajorroletoplayinensuringthesustainabilityofnaturalresourcesandincombatingclimatechange.
Thisreport,preparedbyFAOandtheOECDwithinputsfromIFPRI,IFAD,theWorldBankandWTO,issubmittedtotheG20ArgentinianPresidencyinresponsetothePresidency’srequestforinformationonfuturetrendsandchallengesfacedbyglobalagriculture,withaspecialfocusontheroleofsoilsinpromotingfoodsecurityandthemeasuresthatcouldbeundertakentofacilitatesustainablesoilmanagement.
Section2ofthereportdiscussesanumberofglobaltrendsthatareaffectingagricultureand
foodsecurity,andthechallengestheypose.ThesectionalsomapstheG20initiativesandactionsthataddressthesetrendsandchallengesand,inconjunctionwiththeinformationprovidedbyStock-takingexerciseofG20initiatives,providesacomprehensiveaccountofcollectiveactiontodate.Section3focusesonsoilsandsustainablesoilmanagement.Itdiscussesthestatusofglobalsoilsandidentifiesthemostimportantthreats.Itpresentssustainablesoilpractices,anddiscussestheinternationalforathatfocusspecificallyonsoilresources.Finally,thesectionprovidesanumberofrecommendationsforconsiderationbytheG20AgricultureDeputies.
TrendsandChallenges2.1. Foodsecurityandnutrition Theglobalrateofundernourishmentsignificantlydecreasedfrom14.7percentin2000to10.8
percentin2013.Afterthisprolongeddecline,therateofreductioninworldhungerappearstohaveslowedinthepastfewyears,comingtoavirtualhaltbetween2013and2015.Mostworryingly,recentestimatesfor20161indicatethattheglobalprevalenceofundernourishmentmayhaverisenslightlyto11percent,affectingatotalof815millionpeople,upfrom777millionin2015,andsuggestingapossiblereversalofthedownwardtrendseeninrecentdecades.(Figure1).Sub-SaharanAfricaremainstheregionwiththehighestrateofundernourishment,affecting22.7percentofthepopulationin2016.ThesituationisespeciallyurgentinEasternAfrica,whereone-thirdofthepopulationisestimatedtobeundernourished.Bycontrast,undernourishmentremainslowinLatinAmerica,althoughtherearesignsthatthesituationmaybechanging,especiallyinSouthAmerica,wherethelevelsrosefrom5percentin2015to5.6percentin2016.
1FAO,IFAD,UNICEF,WFPandWHO.2017.TheStateofFoodSecurityandNutritionintheWorld2017.Buildingresilienceforpeaceandfoodsecurity.Rome.
2
Figure1.PrevalenceofUndernourishmentbyregion,2000-2016
*ProjectedvaluesSource:FAO,IFAD,UNICEF,WFPandWHO.2017.TheStateofFoodSecurityandNutritionintheWorld2017.Buildingresilienceforpeaceandfoodsecurity.Rome.
Estimatesoftheseverityoffoodinsecurity,basedonanexperiencescale2,andthedifferencesintheseestimatesacrosscontinents,largelyreflectthoseforundernourishment.Africahasthehighestlevelsofseverefoodinsecurity,reaching27.4percentofthepopulationin2016,almostfourtimesthelevelofanyotherregion.Itisalsooneoftheregionswherefoodinsecurityisontherise,particularlyinsub-SaharanAfrica.HigherfoodinsecuritywasalsoobservedinLatinAmericabetween2014and2016,risingfrom4.7percentto6.4percent,whileinAsiaitdecreasedslightlyoverthesameperiod,from7.7percentto7.0percentoverall.
Theobservedincreasesinundernourishmentandseverefoodinsecurityaremostnotablein
situationsofconflictandpoliticalinstability,bothofwhichhindergrowthandrepresentmajordriversofpoverty.Forexample,conflict,compoundedbysevereweatherevents,hasresultedinanunprecedentedsituationofseverefoodinsecurityinSouthSudan,Somalia,North-EasternNigeriaandYemen.Thesecountriestogetheraccountfor108millionpeopleonthebrinkoffamine.
Theworrisomereversalofthedownwardtrendinundernourishmentis,however,notyetreflectedinnutritionaloutcomes.Evidencepointstocontinuousdecreasesintheprevalenceofstuntingamongchildrenundertheageoffiveyearsfrom29.5percentto22.9percentbetween2005and2016.Nevertheless,stuntingstillaffects155millionchildrenundertheageoffiveyears,increasingtheirriskofimpairedcognitiveability,weakenedperformanceatschool,anddyingfrominfections.Wastingaffectedoneintwelve(52million)ofallchildrenunderfiveyearsofagein2016,morethanhalfofwhom(27.6million)liveinSouthernAsia.Anaemia,aconditionarisingfrommicronutrientdeficiencywithsignificantadversehealthconsequencesforwomenandtheiroffspring,affects33percentofwomenofreproductiveageglobally(about613million).3
2MeasuredusingtheFoodInsecurityExperienceScale(FIES),anexperience-basedmetricoftheseverityoffoodinsecurity,relyingondirectyes/noresponsestoeightquestionsregardingaccesstoadequatefood.AfulldescriptioncanbefoundinFAO,IFAD,UNICEF,WFPandWHO.2017.TheStateofFoodSecurityandNutritionintheWorld2017.Buildingresilienceforpeaceandfoodsecurity.Rome,FAO.3FAO,IFAD,UNICEF,WFPandWHO.2017.TheStateofFoodSecurityandNutritionintheWorld2017.Buildingresilienceforpeaceandfoodsecurity.Rome;DevelopmentInitiatives.2017.GlobalNutritionReport2017:NourishingtheSDGs.Bristol.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2000 2005 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*Percentage
WORLD AFRICA
ASIA LATINAMERICAANDTHECARIBBEAN
OCEANIA
3
Atthesametime,overweightamongchildrenunderfiveisbecomingmoreofaprobleminmostregions,andadultobesitycontinuestoriseinallregions.Multipleformsofmalnutritionthereforecoexist,withcountriesexperiencingsimultaneouslyhighratesofchildundernutritionandadultobesity.Theglobalprevalenceofoverweighthasbeenincreasingandstandsatabout39percentforwomenand37percentformen,withabout1.9billionpeopleworldwideconsideredoverweight.4Obesitymorethandoubledbetween1980and2014.In2014,morethan600millionadultswereobese,representingabout13percentoftheworld’sadultpopulation.Itisalsoobservedthattheprevalenceofobesityis,onaverage,higheramongwomen(15percent)thanamongmen(11percent).
InmonitoringtheprogresstowardsthesecondSustainableDevelopmentGoal(SDG2),whichcallsoncountriesto“endhunger,achievefoodsecurityandimprovednutritionandpromotesustainableagriculture”by2030,theseestimatesareconcerning.Theyconfirmtheincreasedneedfortheinternationalcommunitytoworktogetherinpromotingintegratedpolicyapproachesandactions.Theambitionofaworldwithouthungerandmalnutritionby2030willbechallenging,andachievingitwillrequirerenewedefforts.TheG20addvaluetotheseeffortsbyprovidinginternationalleadershipandencouraginginternationalcooperationandpolicycoherenceassetoutintheG20FoodSecurityandNutrition(FSN)Framework.
Box1.AglobalresponsetoAntimicrobialResistance(AMR)
Sources:Marshall,B.M.andS.B.Levy.2011.FoodAnimalsandAntimicrobials:ImpactsonHumanHealth.ClinicalMicrobiologyReviews,24-4;WorldBank.2017.Drug-resistantInfections.AThreattoOurEconomicFuture.WorldBank.WashingtonD.C.;WHO.2015.GlobalActionPlanonAntimicrobialResistance.Geneva;G20AgricultureMinisters'Declaration2017:TowardsFoodandWaterSecurity:FosteringSustainability,AdvancingInnovation.January22,2017,Berlin
4OverweightisdefinedasBodyMassIndex(BMI)≥25.ForobesityBMI≥30.
Increasedhumanhealthrisksarecausedbythemisuseofantimicrobialdrugs,includingantibiotics,inlivestock,aquacultureandcropproduction.Evidenceisgrowingthatanimal-to-humanspreadofmicrobial-resistantbacteriareducesthehumanbody’sresponsivenesstoantibiotics(MarshallandLevy,2011).Antimicrobialresistance(AMR)–whereantimicrobialdrugs,includingantibiotics,nolongertreatinfectionsthewaytheyaresupposedto–hasthepotentialtocauselargeglobaleconomicdamage.Itcouldcauselow-incomecountriestolosemorethan5percentoftheirGDPandpushupto28millionpeople,mostlyindevelopingcountries,intopovertyby2050(WorldBank2017).TheGlobalActionPlanonAntimicrobialResistance,publishedbyWHOincollaborationwithOIEandFAO,spellsoutcountry-levelactionsneededtoimproveawarenessandunderstandingonantimicrobialresistance,strengthenknowledgeandtheevidencebase,reducetheincidenceofinfection,andoptimizetheuseofantimicrobialmedicinesinhumanandanimalhealthandthecorrespondinginvestment(WHO,2015).TheG20AgricultureMinistershavealreadyproposedtocontainingthedevelopmentandspreadofantimicrobialresistanceinlinewiththe“onehealthapproach”(G20AgriculturalMinistersDeclaration2017),welcomingtheworkbytheG20HealthWorkingGroupsupportedbyOECD,WHO,FAOandtheOIE.
4
2.2. Demandforfood Demandforfoodandotheragriculturalproductsisprojectedtoincreasedrivenbypopulation
growth,increasingpercapitaincomesandchangesindiets.Developingcountrieswillcontributethemosttothesetrendsandchanges.
Theworld’seconomyalmostdoubledinsizebetween1990and2014,growingatarateof2.6
percentayear.Duringthatperiod,globaleconomicgrowthwasdrivenmainlybylow-andmiddle-incomecountries,whosegrossdomesticproduct(GDP)grew,onaverage,bysome5.1percentannually.Therewere,however,markeddivergencesingrowthpatternsbyregion.Forexample,percapitaincomeinEastAsiaandthePacificincreasedby7.4percentayear,whilesub-SaharanAfricasawanincreaseinpercapitaincomeofonly1.1percentayear.Intermsoffutureeconomicgrowth,projectionssuggestthat,underabusiness-as-usualscenario,by2050worldGDPpercapitawilltriple.Underadifferentscenariothatassumesincreasingwithin-andbetween-countryinequality,GDPpercapitawillgrowmuchslower(Figure2).5
Figure2.GDPpercapitaprojectionto2050(in2012US$)
Source:FAO.2017.TheFutureofFoodandAgriculture:TrendsandChallenges.Rome.
Theworld’spopulationisexpectedtogrowtoalmost10billionby2050,withthemajorityof
growthbeinginAsiaandAfrica(Figure3).Asia,themostpopulouscontinent,wouldreachitspopulationpeakbetween2050and2060.InAfrica,themaximumpopulationsizewillnotbereachedwithinthiscentury.Itspopulationissettocontinuetoexpandbeyondtheendofthecenturyandisexpectedtoreachmorethan2.2billionby2050andmorethan4billionby2100.
Manycountriesinsub-SaharanAfricaareexpectedtoexperiencefastpopulationgrowthbetween2015and2030.Forexample,inNigerannualpopulationgrowthisprojectedat3.75percent.Annualgrowthratesofmorethan2.5percentto2050arealsoprojectedforAngola,Burundi,Chad,theDemocraticRepublicoftheCongo,Gambia,Malawi,Mali,Senegal,Somalia,theUnitedRepublicofTanzania,UgandaandZambia.Asallofthesecountriesrelysignificantlyonagricultureforemploymentandincomegeneration,fastpopulationgrowthratescouldalsohamperprospectsforimprovingfoodsecurityandnutrition.
5Thesescenarios,calledSharedSocioeconomicPathways’(SSPs),aredevelopedfortheFifthAssessmentReportoftheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC).Eachscenariodepictsapossiblealternativefuture.Inthisreporttwo(outoffive)scenariosarepresented:thebusiness-as-usualormiddleoftheroad(SSP2)andtheinternationalfragmentation(SSP4).
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
201520172019202120232025202720292031203320352037203920412043204520472049
Businessasusual Increasinginequality
5
Inlinewiththesepopulationprojections,andunderabusiness-as-usualeconomicgrowth
scenario,tomeetdemand,agriculturein2050willneedtoproducealmost50percentmorefood,feedandbiofuelthanin2012.Insub-SaharanAfricaandSouthAsia,agriculturaloutputwouldneedtomorethandoubleby2050tomeetincreaseddemand.6Producingmorewithless,whilepreservingnaturalresourcesandenhancingthelivelihoodsofsmall-scalefamilyfarmers,isakeychallengeforthefuture.
Figure3.Populationgrowthbyregion,1950-2100(Billions)
Source:FAO.2017.TheFutureofFoodandAgriculture:TrendsandChallenges.Rome.
Anadditionaleffectwillcomethroughgrowingincomesinlow-andmiddle-incomecountries.
Thisisexpectedtohastenadietarytransitiontowardshigherconsumptionofmeat,fruitsandvegetables,relativetothatofcereals,requiringcorrespondingshiftsinoutputandaddingfurtherpressureonnaturalresources.Inthemedium-term,significantincreasesinpercapitacalorieavailabilityareexpectedindevelopingcountries.Nonetheless,foodinsecurityisexpectedtoremainacriticalglobalconcern,andwithconsumptionofsomeproducts,notablyquantitiesofvegetableoilsandsugarinfoodintake,exceedinglevelsconsistentwithhealthydiets,theco–existenceofmalnutritioninitsvariousformsmaycontinuetoposechallengesinmanycountries.
Policieswillneedtoaddresstheseincreasingandmultiplechallengeswhileensuringinclusive
growth.Economicgrowthisanecessarybutnotsufficientconditioninreducingpovertyanderadicatinghunger.Makinggrowthworkforthepoorisasignificanttask.Thehungryarethepoorestofthepoorwhoselivesarecircumscribedbyself-reinforcingtraps,whicharesubsequentlypassedontotheirchildreninanintergenerationalcycleofpoverty.Theirmainassetislabourand,inthisregard,sustainableproductivitygrowthinagriculture,inparticular,canplayakeyroleinpovertyreduction.However,hungerreducestheircapacitytobeproductiveandincreasestheriskofdisease.Ensuringpro-poorgrowthrequiresatwin-trackapproach.Policiesneedtocombineimmediatehungerreliefinterventionswithlong-termactionsforsustainableagriculturalgrowth.Socialprotectionstrategies,inparticular,cantargetthepoorestandmostvulnerableandaimtoeaseinequality.
6FAO.2017.TheFutureofFoodandAgriculture:TrendsandChallenges.Rome.
0
2
4
6
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
2055
2060
2065
2070
2075
2080
2085
2090
2095
2100
AFRICA ASIAEUROPE LATINAMERICAANDTHECARIBBEANNORTHERNAMERICA OCEANIA
6
2.3. Climatechange Climatechangedisproportionatelyaffectsfood-insecureregionsandexacerbatesthefood
securitychallengestheyalreadyexperience.Inthelongrun,risingtemperaturesmaysignificantlyaffectcropandlivestockproductionthroughyieldreductions,especiallyintropicalareas,andwillhaveanegativeimpactonfoodavailability,ruralincomesandsubsequentlyonaccesstofood.Risingtemperatureswillalsonegativelyimpactfisheriesandaquaculture,whichprovideatleast50percentofanimalproteintomillionsofpeopleinlow-incomecountriesandarealreadyundermultiplestresses.Inmanyregions,agriculturalproductionisalreadybeingadverselyaffectedbyrisingtemperatures,increasedtemperaturevariability,changesinlevelsandfrequencyofprecipitation,theincreasingintensityofextremeweatherevents,risingsealevelsandincreasesinvector-bornediseases.
Uptoacertainpoint,warmertemperaturesmaybenefitthegrowthofcertaincropsinsome
partsoftheworld.However,iftemperaturesexceedacrop’soptimallevel,orifsufficientwaterandnutrientsarenotavailable,yieldsarelikelytofall.Impactswillalsovarystronglyacrosscropsandregions.Numerousstudies,mostlyonthemajorcrops,haveexaminedthepotentialimpactofclimatechangeonyields.Ingeneral,higherlatitudeswilltendtoseesmalleryieldlosses,orevenyieldgains,whileyieldlossesinlowerlatituderegionsareexpectedtobegreater.However,impactswillbelocationspecificandvarystronglyacrosscropsandregions(Figure4).Inaddition,somestudiesindicatethatthenutritionalqualityofkeyfoodcropscouldsufferbecauseofclimatechange.
Figure4.Projectedchangesincropyieldsforalllocationsowingtoclimatechange
(percentofyieldsprojections,numberofstudies=1,090)7
Source:FAO.2016.TheStateofFoodandAgriculture:ClimateChange,AgricultureandFoodSecurity.Rome.
Meetingthegrowingdemandforfoodwithexistingfarmingpracticesislikelytoleadtomoreintensecompetitionfornaturalresources,increasedgreenhousegasemissions,andfurther
7Thechartshowsresultsof1,090studiesontheimpactofclimatechangeyieldsonvariousregionsoftheworld.Studiesshowbothpositiveandnegativeimpactsassomeregionsbenefit(blueshade)whileotherssufferfromyielddecreases(orangeshade).Thebarsshowthepercentageofstudiesthatprojectyieldchanges.Somestudiesprojectincreasesbetween50-100percent(deepblue).Othersshowdeclinesbetween50-100percent(deeporange).Thetimescaleofthesestudiesisshownonthehorizontalaxis.Thestudiespointtoaprevalenceofnegativeoutcomesinthelongerrun.Untilabout2030,thepositiveandnegativeeffectsofclimatechangeonyieldsareprojectedtooffseteachother.From2030onwardstheimpactsareincreasinglynegativeasclimatechangeaccelerates.
7
deforestationandlanddegradation.Inthecurrentcontextofmassivedeforestation,waterscarcities,soildepletionandhighlevelsofgreenhousegasemissions,high-inputandresource-intensivefarmingsystemscannotdeliversustainablefoodandagriculturalproduction.Innovativesystemsthatprotectandenhancethenaturalresourcebase,whileincreasingproductivityareneeded.Farmingmethodswillneedtoembracetechnologicalimprovementsandproductionsystemsthatusefewerinputstoachieveagivenoutput,andmovetowards‘holistic’approachesthatcancontributetosustainableproductivitygrowth,suchasagroecology,agro-forestry,climate-smartagricultureandconservationagriculture,whichalsobuilduponindigenousandtraditionalknowledge.
Climatechangehasbecomeasourceofuncertaintyandoftenalsoofsignificantadditionalrisks
foragricultureandfoodsystems.Increasedclimatevariabilityandextremeweathereventswillaffectstabilityandpricevolatility.Climaticeventsthatleadtoproductionlossesandinfrastructuredamagecanresultinsignificantincreasesinthepriceoffood,whichwillaffectmillionsofpoorpeople.AgriculturalRiskManagement(ARM)canplayanimportantroleinbuildingresilienceofstakeholdersinthefaceofunpredictabilityandinthetransitiontoclimate-smartagriculturesystems.InitiativessuchasthePlatformforAgriculturalRiskManagement(PARM),8anoutcomeofG20discussionsonfoodsecurityandagriculturalgrowth,arevitalinthisregard.PARMstrengthensARMstrategiesinselecteddevelopingcountriesinaholisticmannerandonademand-drivenbasis,andsupportscountriesinincorporatingsuchstrategiesintopublicpolicies,privatesectorpractices,andagriculturalinvestmentprogrammes.
8TheIFAD-hostedPlatformforAgriculturalRiskManagement’sofficialwebsiteis:http://p4arm.org/
8
Box2.UnderstandingthemagnitudeandcausesofFoodLossandWaste(FLW)
Eachyear,anestimatedone-thirdofallfoodproducedforhumanconsumptionislostorwastedworld-wide.Foodlossandwaste(FLW)1occurthroughoutthesupplychains:fromprimaryproductiontofinalhouseholdconsumption.Ithasdirectandsignificantimplicationsforfoodavailabilityandnutrition,naturalresources,andclimatechange.
Inmiddle-andhigh-incomecountries,foodiswastedandlostmainlyatlaterstagesinthesupplychain,withmorethan40percentofthiswasteoccurringatretailandconsumerlevels.Foodwasteisrecognisedasadistinctpartoffoodlossbecausethedriversthatgenerateit,andthereforetheapproachestotacklingit,arequitedifferent.Solutionsshouldfocusonraisingawarenessamongindustries,retailersandconsumersaswellasfindingbeneficialuseforfoodthatispresentlynotconsumed.
Inlow-incomecountries,FLWoccursmainlyattheearlyandmiddlestagesofthefoodsupplychainwithlowerlevelsofwasteatconsumerlevel.FLWcanbetracedbacktofinancial,managerialandtechnicalconstraintsinharvestingtechniquesaswellasstorageandcoolingfacilities,withanestimated40percentoflossesoccurringatpost-harvestandprocessinglevels.Thesetranslateintolostincomeforsmallfarmersandhigherpricesforpoorconsumers.Strengtheningthesupplychainthroughinvestmentsininfrastructure,transportationandfarmers’capacities,aswellasinanexpansionofthefoodandpackagingindustrycouldhelptoreducelosses.Inaddition,pestsanddiseases,lackofrainfall,andlackofappropriateharvestingtechniquesarealsoimportantcausesofpost-harvestlossesatthefarmlevel(Delgadoetal.,2018).Promotingimprovedandclimate-smartfarmingpracticestechniquesthereforewillalsobeimportanttoreducingfoodloss.
Asabasisforpublicaction,aclearerunderstandingofthemagnitudeandcausesoffoodlossandwasteacrossallstagesoffoodsupplychainsisnecessary.ReducingFLWwillrequireimprovementsinhandling,processing,transportation,andconsumerhabits.Inresponsetothischallengein2015,theG20members,whoprovideimpetusonglobalactionstoreducefoodlossandwaste,requestedtheestablishmentofaplatformtoimproveFLWmeasurementandtofacilitateknowledgesharingonthistopic,withaspecialfocusonpost-harvestlossreductionsinlow-incomecountries.TheTechnicalPlatformontheMeasurementandReductionofFoodLossandWaste(TPFLW)2wasestablishedtoimprovecoherenceandconsistencyinthemeasurementofFWL,raiseawareness,andpromoteapproachesforFLWreductionbysharingsuccessfulexperiencesandbestpractices,inthecontextofsustainablefoodsystems.ThePlatformissupportedbytheMeetingofAgriculturalChiefScientistsoftheG20(MACS-G20)FoodLossandWasteInitiative3,whichaimstoshareinformationandexperiencesrelatingtoagriculturalscienceandtechnology,inmeasuringandreducingfoodlossandwaste.
1Foodlossisdefinedas“thedecreaseinquantityorqualityoffood”andreferstoallfoodproducedforhumanconsumptionbutnoteatenbyhumans.Foodwasteispartoffoodlossandreferstodiscardingoralternative(non-food)useoffoodthatissafeandnutritiousforhumanconsumptionalongtheentirefoodsupplychain,fromprimaryproductiontoendhouseholdconsumerlevel.2http://www.fao.org/platform-food-loss-waste/en/3https://www.global-flw-research.org//
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
NorthAmerica,OceaniaEurope
IndustrializedAsiaLatinAmerica
NorthAfrica,West&CentralAsiaSubsaharaAfrica
South&SoutheastAsia
kg/percapita/year
PerCapitaFoodLossesandWaste(kg/percapita/year)
ProductiontoRetailing Consumer
9
Box3.Smallholderagricultureremainscentraltopovertyreduction
Manyofthechallengesfacedbyagriculture,especiallyindevelopingcountries,canbemetbysuccessfulstructuraltransformation,includingruraltransformation.Labourproductivityincreasesinagriculturepromotefoodsecurity,leadtohigherwages,especiallyfortheunskilledintheruralareas,andcontributetowardstheeradicationofextremepoverty.Asstructuralandruraltransformationproceed,agriculturecontributestoeconomicgrowthinothersectorsandthewidereconomy,andentrepreneurialandjobopportunitiesarecreatedallalongagriculturalsupplychains.Farmersbecomemorecompetitive.Morenutritiousfoodresultsinhighernon-farmproductivity,andasruralhouseholdsinvestinhumancapital,theyfurtherraisetheirownproductivityanddiversifytheirincomesourceswithsomefamilymembersleavingthefarmforothereconomicopportunities.Increasingagriculturalproductivityofsmall-scalefoodproducersisaspecificgoal(SDG2.3)ofthe2030Agenda.
Theevolutionofthesmallholderfarmisintrinsicallylinkedtostructuraltransformationandtoeconomicgrowth.Therearemorethan570millionfarmsintheworld.Morethan90percentoffarmsarerunbyanindividualorafamilyandrelyprimarilyonfamilylabour.Familyfarmsarebyfarthemostprevalentformofagricultureintheworld.Estimatessuggestthattheyoccupyaround70–80percentoffarmlandandproducemorethan80percentoftheworld’sfoodinvalueterms.
Worldwide,farmsoflessthan1hectareaccountfor72percentofallfarmsbutcontrolonly8percentofallagriculturalland.Slightlylargerfarmsbetween1and2hectaresaccountfor12percentofallfarmsandcontrol4percentoftheland,whilefarmsintherangeof2to5hectaresaccountfor10percentofallfarmsandcontrol7percentoftheland.Incontrast,only1percentofallfarmsintheworldarelargerthan50hectares.InsomedevelopingcountriesinAsiaandAfrica,furtherfragmentationofsmallfarmholdingsistakingplace,raisingquestionsabouttheirviability.
Smallfarmsarekeyinpromotingfoodsecurityandpovertyreduction,buttheyhaveanimportantroletoplaywithinthebroadercontextofdevelopment:smallfamilyfarmershavemorefavourableexpenditurepatternstopromoteruraldevelopmentthantheirlargercounterparts.Transformationwillalsoaffectboththeevolutionofthesmallholderfamilyandthefarmsize.Withwell-functioningfactormarkets,productivitygrowthallowswagestorise,andruralhouseholdmembersdiversifytheirincomesourcesbyobtainingbetter-paidoff-farmwork.Aspeopleleaveagricultureforothereconomicopportunities,theshareofagricultureinGDPandemploymentdeclines,togetherwithpoverty.
Today,smallholdergainsfromglobalizationappeartobelimited.Providinganenablingenvironmentisrequiredtoincreasetheirsustainableproductionandintegratetomarketsthroughimprovementsininfrastructure,technologyadoptionandefficientinputuse.Abetterinvestmentclimatewillcontributetowardssustainableproductivitygrowthandfacilitatetransformationandruraldevelopment.
Thedevelopmentofsmall-scaleagriculturehasbeenafocusoftheG20since2011,whenAgricultureMinisterscommittedtoimplementingabroadscopeofactionstoboostagriculturalgrowth,givingspecialattentiontosmallholders,womenandyoungfarmers,inparticularindevelopingcountries.G20membersencouragethepromotionofnationalenablingenvironmentsforinvestment,includinginfrastructureandpoliciesconducivetowell-functioningmarkets,theintegrationofsmallholdersandwomenintothosemarkets,inclusivefinancinginstitutions,securetenureofland,socialprotection,themanagementofriskandmeasurestolimittheadverseimpactsofexcessivepricevolatility.
Sources:InternationalFundforAgriculturalDevelopment.2016.RuralDevelopmentReport2016:fosteringinclusiveruraltransformation.Rome.WorldBankandIFAD.2017.RuralYouthEmployment:ASynthesisStudy.ReporttotheG20DevelopmentWorkingGroup.FAO.2014.TheStateofFoodandAgriculture:InnovationinFamilyFarming.Rome.
Source:FAO(2016).TheStateofFoodandAgriculture(Cambria8)
10
2.4. Sustainableagriculturalproductivitygrowth Addressingglobalfoodsecurityobjectivesisamultidimensionalglobalchallenge.Thecore
contributionofagriculturecanbeencapsulatedinthegoalofachievingsustainableproductivitygrowth,protectingthenaturalresourcebaseandenablingfuturegrowth.FindingtheappropriatepolicytoolstoenhancethecapacityofthefoodandagriculturesectortogrowsustainablyisachallengeforallgovernmentsandatargetfortheinternationalcommunityasestablishedinSDG2.4ofthe2030AgendaforSustainableDevelopment.Respondingtothischallengehasthepotentialofdeliveringtherequiredincreasesinproduction,withimprovementsinfarmingreturnsandruralincomes,whileassuringthesustainabilityofthenaturalresources.
Averageannualgrowthinglobalagriculturalproductionhassloweddownfrom2.9percentinthe1960sto2.1percentinthe1980sand2.5percentinthe2000s.Inthe1960sand1970smostofthisgrowthcamefromintensificationofinputuseperhectare,suchaslabour,capitalandotherinputs(Figure5).Despitetheslowdownintherateofgrowthintheuseoftheseinputfactorsinthelasttwodecades,outputhascontinuedtogrowthankstogainsinTotalFactorProductivity(TFP).9Sincethe1990s,mostoftheglobalagriculturalproductiongrowthisduetoincreasesinTFP.Thismeansusingbetterfarmingpracticestocombinethedifferentfactorsofproduction(improvingtechnicalefficiency),andinnovatingwithnewtechnologiesthatexpandtheproductionfrontier.AsignificantpartoftheTFPgrowthisduetotheadoptionoflaboursavingpractices.
Intheperiod2001-14,agriculturalproductionhadgrownfasterinlow-andmiddle-incomecountriesthaninhighincomecountries.Inlow-incomecountries,however,agriculturalgrowthhasbeenprimarilydrivenbyincreasedinputandlanduseratherthanbyproductivitygains.Despitethesesignificantdifferencesamongcountries,eveninthelow-incomegroup,TFPgrowthoutstrippedtheuseofvariableinputsperhectareasasourceofagriculturalgrowth.Inthefuture,mostoftheincreasesinglobalagriculturalproductionareexpectedtoresultfromapplyingfurtherexistingornewtechnologiesandpractices.
Figure5.SourcesofGrowthonGlobalAgriculturaloutput
Source:USDA,EconomicResearchService,InternationalAgriculturalProductivitydataproduct,asofOctober2017
9TotalFactorProductivity(TFP)istheportionofoutputnotexplainedbytheamountofinputsusedinproduction.Assuch,itslevelisdeterminedbyhowefficientlyandintenselytheinputsareutilizedinproduction.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1961-70 1971-80 1981-90 1991-00 2001-14
TFP
Input/Area
Irrigation
New land
11
AsTFPdrivestheincreaseinproduction,itsgrowthalsotranslatesintoincreasingtheefficiencyandcompetitivenessoftheagriculturalsector.Consequently,increasingreturnstothefactorsofproduction,includinglandandlabour,bringaboutincreasesinfarmandruralhouseholds’incomes.Inordertorealisethesepotentialgains,innovationinthewidesenseisrequired,combiningadaptedtechnologieswithimprovedfarmmanagementpractices.Thereisevidenceofhighratesofreturntoresearchanddevelopmentaccompaniedwithextension,albeitwithlongtimelags.10Moreover,therealizationofincreasedopportunitieswithinagricultureandinothersectorsgoeshand-in-handwiththeagriculturaltransformation.
Sustainableproductivitygrowthisalsokeytoruralgrowthanddevelopment,asittendstotranslateinincomeincreasesforfarmers.Assuchitcanopenopportunitiesfortheruralareaswheremostofthepoorarelocated,drivingagricultural(structural)transformation.Itisimportantthattheseimprovementsinproductivityreachpoorfarmersinlowincomecountries.
Alongthepathofagriculturaltransformation,farmersbecomemorecompetitive,households
diversifytheirincomesources(forexamplebyafamilymemberobtainingoff-farmwork)andpeople–oftensonsanddaughters–leavethefarmforothereconomicopportunities.Intheaggregate,sustainableTFPgrowthfacilitatesthereleaseoflabourfromtheagriculturalsector,butalsochangesthenatureoftheworkandupgradestheskillsrequiredforthoseemployedinthesector,makingthesectormoreattractiveforyoungerpeople.Thechallengeistogeneratebalanceddevelopmentsothatlabouris“pulled”outofagricultureviarisingopportunities,ratherthansimply“pushed”outbyimprovementsinlabourproductivity.
Increasingagriculturalproductionsustainably
TFPgrowthissustainableifitiscompatiblewiththepreservationofnaturalcapital,conservingandenhancingnaturalresourcesrequiredforagriculture,suchaswaterandsoil.Likephysicalcapital,naturalcapitalneedsinvestmentandmaintenancetoretainitsproductivityinthelongrun.Tobesustainable,productivitygrowthwillalsoneedtoaccountfortheprojectedimpactsofclimatechange,theassociatedadaptationresponses,andthepotentialroleofagricultureintheglobalgreenhousegasmitigationeffort.Thereisevidencethatitispossibletodissociate(or“decouple”)thegrowthinTFPfromtheuseofadditionalnaturalresources.Forinstance,wateruseandpesticideshavebeendecoupledfromincreasedoutputinAustralia,theUnitedStatesandKorea(Table1).
10Bioversity, CGIAR Consortium, FAO, IFAD, IFPRI, IICA, OECD, UNCTAD, Coordination team of UN High Level Task Force on the Food Security Crisis, WFP, World Bank, and WTO. 2012. Sustainable agricultural productivity growth: Bridging the gap for small-family farms. Interagency. Report to the G20 Agriculture Deputies.
12
Table1.Decouplingagricultureproductivityfromresourceandenvironmentalpressure:observedtrendsamongselectedcountries,betweenthe1990sandthe
periodsince2000 Resource use Environmental impacts
Absolute decoupling Water use: Australia, Netherlands, Estonia, Korea Land use: Netherlands, Korea
N and P balance: Estonia, Korea, Sweden, USA, Turkey Ammonia: Netherlands, Sweden, USA GHG emissions: Netherlands, Turkey Pesticide use: Netherlands, USA, Korea
Relative decoupling Water use: China, Turkey, USA Energy use: USA, Estonia
GHG emissions: USA, Estonia
Deterioration Energy use: Turkey Pesticide use: Turkey; GHG emissions: Korea
Note:AbsolutedecouplingreferstoasituationinwhichresourceuseandenvironmentalimpactsdeclineinabsolutetermswhileTFPincreases.Relativedecouplingreferstoadeclineintheecologicalintensityperunitofeconomicoutput.DeteriorationreferstoasituationofincreasesinresourceuseorenvironmentalimpactbeyondtheincreaseinTFP.Timeperiodscorrespondthemostrecentdecadeforwhichthereisinformationavailable,whichisnotidenticalforeachcountry;morerecentdatesonagri-environmentalindicatorsmightalterthisassessment.Thistableissubjecttheexistinglimitationsintheinformationandmethodstoevaluatethejointproductivityandsustainabilityperformance.
Source:AdaptedfromOECDcountryreviews.http://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural-policies/innovation-food-agriculture.htmbasedonTFPdataandOECDAgri-environmentalindicators
InnovationandR&Dinfoodandagriculture
Productivityandsustainabilityoutcomesdependalsoinotherimportantdrivers:innovationandstructuralchange.Productivitycanbeimprovedthrougheconomiesofscaleandtheadoptionofmoreefficientexistenttechnologiesandpractices.Butthelongtermsustainableproductivitygrowthdependsonacontinuousprocessoftechnicalprogressandsocialandbusinessinnovations.Innovationshouldincreasinglymovefromalinear(lab-to-field)approachtoademanddrivennetworkconnectingfarmers,industry,consumersandresearch,whichrequiresgoodgovernance,interactionsandcollaborationamongnationalactorsandacrosscountries,andmechanismstofacilitateadoption.
Evidencegatheredincountryreviewsconfirmsthatinnovationisamajordriverofbothproductivitygrowthandsustainabilityinmanycases.Examplesaretheadoptionofinput-savingtechnologyandproductionpractices,suchaslow-tillage,modernbuildingsallowingenergysavings,machineryforprecisionagriculture,geneticimprovement,bettermanagementofrisks,andchangesinmarketingpractices.InformationandCommunicationTechnologies(ICT)contributetoreducinginputuse(labour,energy,fertiliserandpesticidesthroughprecisionagriculture)andthusimprovingproductivityandsustainabilityperformances.ICTsalsofacilitatesharingofinformation,participationandtraceabilityalongtheglobalvaluechainsandincreasinglyconnectsmallfarmerstomarkets,reducingtransactioncosts,andpotentiallyraisingfoodsystemefficiencies,sustainabilityandinclusion.11 Moregenerally,newtechnologyisalreadyshapinghowagriculturalvaluechainsare
organized,offeringpotentialtoaccelerateinnovationandnewopportunitiesforincomegains,entrepreneurship,andhigherskilledjobsinthefoodsystem.EmergingtechnologiesdrivenbytheFourthIndustrialRevolution,includingBigDataandArtificialIntelligence,newphysicalsystemssuchasautomation,robotics,andadditivemanufacturing,andadvancesinscience,suchasnew
11FAO with inputs from IFPRI and OECD. 2017. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Agriculture. Report to the G20 Agriculture Deputies.
13
energytechnologiesandnextgenerationbiotechnologiesandgenomics,offersignificantopportunitiesforthefoodsystem.12Solarpowerisprovidingnewjobopportunitiesforagro-processinginoff-gridareas.RemotesensingtechnologiesarebeingusedtooffermechanizedandextensionservicesinsomeAfricancountries.Digitalfinanceisincreasingfinancialinclusioninmanyregions,thusfacilitatingmicro-entrepreneurship.E-commerceplatformsarelinkingsmallentrepreneursinruralareaswithnationalandglobalmarkets.
ThebudgetexpenditureonagriculturalR&Disanindicatoroftheinnovationeffortbythe
governments.Intheperiod2000-15R&Dexpenditurehasbeenreducedinsomemajorexportingcountriesasapercentageoftheagriculturalvalueadded(Figure6).Althoughresearchintensityhasincreasedinseveraldevelopedcountriesandemergingeconomies,agriculturalresearchinvestmentlevelsinmostlow-andmiddle-incomecountriesfallwellbelow1percentofagriculturalgrossdomesticproduct.Agriculturalresearchinvestmentreturnscantakedecadesfromtheinceptionofresearchtotheadoptionofanewtechnologyoranewvariety,requiringsustainedandstableresearchfunding.13
Figure6.ShareofbudgetexpendituresonagricultureR&Dasapercentageofagriculturalvalue-added,2000and2015
Note:NoinformationavailableforTurkeyandMexicoin2000.
Source:OECDstatistics[ResearchandDevelopment,OECDNationalAccounts],http://stats.oecd.org/;and,ASTI.2017.
12WorldEconomicForum.2018.InnovationwithaPurpose:TheRoleofTechnologyInnovationinAcceleratingFoodSystemTransformation.PreparedincollaborationwithMcKinsey&Company.NewYork.13ASTI.2017.FoodPolicyIndicators:TrackingChange:AgriculturalScienceAndTechnologyIndicators;Alston,J.2010.TheBenefitsfromAgriculturalResearchandDevelopment,Innovation,andProductivityGrowth.OECDFood,AgricultureandFisheriesPapers,No.31,OECDPublishing,Paris.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Turkey India Mexico China Colombia Netherlands Argentina United States Australia Brazil Canada
%
2015 2000
14
Despitethediversityofsituationsbetweenthem,countriesfacecommonopportunitiesandchallengesforimprovingagriculturalproductivitysustainably.GovernmentsremainmajorfundersofagricultureR&Dbutfacebudgetconstraintsandneedtobeselectiveintheirinvestments,redirectingtheresourcesforagriculturalinterventionstowardsmeasuresthatarewelltargetedtostrengthentheproductivityandsustainabilityofthesector.Thepublicsectorplaysamajorroleintheprovisionofknowledgeinfrastructureandthefinancingofbasicresearchorresearchonlong-termandpublicgoodaspectsnottakenbytheprivatesectorsuchasnaturalresourcemanagement.14Governmentsshouldalsoencourageinnovationactivitiesintheprivatesector,fosteringknowledgemarketsthroughIntellectualPropertyRightsprotection,andexploitingsynergiesandcomplementaritieswithformalpublic-privatepartnerships(PPPs)whenappropriate.15AgriculturalInnovationSystems(AIS)needstrategicfocusandbeinsertedinregionalorinternationalinitiatives.
InvestmentandenhancinginternationalexchangeonR&Dandinnovation
InvestmentinagricultureisessentialtomaterializethepotentialproductivityandsustainabilitygainsderivedfromR&Dandinnovation.InternationalinitiativeslikethePrinciplesforResponsibleInvestmentinAgricultureandFoodSystems(CFS-RAI),thePolicyFrameworkforInvestmentinAgriculturePFIA16andtheGuidanceforResponsibleAgriculturalSupplyChains17definehowresponsibleinvestmentinagricultureandfoodsystemscancontributetofoodsecurityandnutrition,andhowtocreateanattractiveinvestmentenvironmentforallinvestors,privateorpublic,domesticorforeign,smallorlarge.
Improvingcrosscountrysupplyofinnovationsandcrossbordertechnologytransferiscrucialtoincreaseproductivitygrowthandaddresstransboundaryissuessuchascontagiousdiseases,climatechangemitigationandadaptation,andthesustainabilityofwaterresources.TheinternationalR&Darchitectureandgoodcoordinationbetweennational,internationalandregionalresearchnetworksisimportant,inparticularforlow-incomecountries.Increasesintheeffectivenessandspill-oversofR&Dandtechnologyadoptioncanbeenhancedbyinternationalorganizations,suchastheCGIARanditson-the-groundresearchcentres.OtherglobalinitiativesonR&DcooperationincludetheGlobalForumforAgriculturalResearch,theGlobalSoilPartnershipandtheGlobalResearchAllianceonAgriculturalGreenhouseGases.
TheG20havelaunchedseveralinitiativesalignedwithitscomparativeadvantageonthelong
termstrategicapproachestoprovidepublicgoodsandpolicydialogue.In2012theG20PresidencyofMexicoestablishedtheMeetingsofAgriculturalChiefScientistsofG20(MACS).18MACSpurposeistoaddresscentralscienceandresearchquestionsinthefieldsofagricultureandnutritionthataretoogreattobesolvedwithonlynationalefforts,tobettercoordinateagriculturalresearchsystems,andtoseekandapplycommonsolutionstrategies.MACShasbeenactiveinsharingresearchprioritiesandprioritizationmodelsinspecificresearchareassuchasfoodlossesandwaste.
14OECD.2015.Analysingpoliciestoimproveagriculturalproductivitygrowth,sustainably:DraftFramework,May.15Moreddu,C.2016.Public-PrivatePartnershipsforAgriculturalInnovation:LessonsFromRecentExperiences.OECDFood,AgricultureandFisheriesPapers,No.92,OECDPublishing,Paris.16OECD. 2014. Policy Framework for Investment in Agriculture, OECD Publishing, Paris.17OECDandFAO.2016.OECD-FAOGuidanceforResponsibleAgriculturalSupplyChains.18MACS-G20website:www.macs-g20.org.
15
In2012,theG20alsoproposedtodeveloptheFrameworkforImprovingSustainableProductivityGrowth,ananalyticaltoolforimprovingagriculturalproductivityandsustainabilitytoanalyzepolicyexperiencesinachievingsustainableproductivitygrowth.TheframeworkhasbeendevelopedandappliedtoaselectionofG20andOECDcountries(Australia,Brazil,Canada,Netherlands,Turkey,UnitedStates,China,Estonia,KoreaandSweden).19
SeveralG20initiativesaredirectlyfocusedonimprovinginnovationandcontributingtoglobalfoodsecurity:theGrouponEarthObservationsGlobalAgriculturalMonitoringInitiative(GEOGLAM);20theInternationalResearchInitiativeforWheatImprovement(IRIWI);21and,theTropicalAgriculturalPlatform(TAP)22thataimsatbuildingAIScapacityindevelopingcountries.MorerecentG20proposalsfocusedoninnovationandsustainability,includingtheassessmentandexchangeofexperienceofICTtechnologiesforagricultureproposedunderthePresidencyofChinain2016,andtheAgriculturalMinistersActionPlanonwaterundertheGermanpresidencyin2017.
Despiteon-goingeffortstoimprovethemeasurementofsustainableproductivityanditsdrivers,suchasstructuralchangeandinnovation,onacomparablebasisacrosscountries(e.g.agri-environmentalindicators,agriculturaltotalfactorproductivity,farm-levelproductivityandactivitiesofdifferentpolicyinitiatives23),informationonthejointperformanceofproductivityandsustainabilityisoftenlimitedanddifficulttocompare.MACShasreflectedthisconcernbothintheirCommuniquésof2015and2016,andinawhitepaperonthe“MetricsofSustainableAgriculturalProductivity”.Monitoringdevelopmentsonsustainableproductivitygrowthacrosscountriesrequiresfurtherinvestmentonmethodsandanalyticalframeworksthatwouldallowinternationalbenchmarkingofproductivityandsustainabilityperformanceofagriculture.
2.5. Tradeandtransparencyinfoodmarkets Tradehasanimportantroletoplayinraisingagriculturalproductionandfarmers’incomes.It
enablesproductiontobelocatedinareasthatcanuseresourcesmoreefficientlyandallowsfoodtomovefromsurplustodeficitareas,thuscontributingtofoodsecurityandnutrition.Growthinglobaltradehasunderpinnedtheimprovedavailabilityoffood.Agriculturalandtotalmerchandisetradehavebothexperiencedseveraldecadesofhighgrowthrates,inparticularduringthefirstyearsofthe21stcentury,during2000-06.Theglobaltradeslowdownof2008-09impliedasignificantreductioninglobaltradeaffectingallproducts(Figure7).Neverthelessagriculturewaslessnegativelyaffectedthanothersectorsandin2016worldagriculturalexportswere70percenthigherthanin2006.Themostrecentindicatorsfor2017suggestastrongannualrateof2.4percentofglobaltradegrowthcomparedto1.3percentin2016.24
19OECD.2013.AgriculturalInnovationSystems:AFrameworkforAnalysingtheRoleoftheGovernment.OECDPublishing,OECD.2015.Analysingpoliciestoimproveagriculturalproductivitygrowth,sustainably:DraftFramework,May.20https://cropmonitor.org21http://www.wheatinitiative.org22http://www.fao.org/in-action/tropical-agriculture-platform/en/23TheOECDNetworksonAgricultureTotalFactorProductivityandtheEnvironmenthttp://www.oecd.org/tad/events/oecdnetworkonagriculturaltotalfactorproductivityandtheenvironment.htm;and,theFarmLevelAnalysisNetwork(https://www.oecd.org/agriculture/farm-level-analysis-network/).AnimportantpartoftheformerfocussesondevelopingmethodologicalguidelinesthatcountriescanusetoconstructproductivityaccountsforthemeasurementofTFPandenvironmentallyadjustedTFPtrends.24WTO.2017.WorldTradeStatisticsReview2017.Geneva.
16
Figure7.Worldmerchandisetradebymajorproductgrouping,2006-2016
(Index2006=100)
Note:WorldtradeiscalculatedasanaverageofexportsandimportsofmerchandisetradeSource:WTO(2017).Worldtradeasanaverageofexportsandimportsofmerchandisetrade.
Therelativeshareofagriculturaltradeindomesticconsumptionremainssmall,intherangeof
0-20percentformanycountries.Theexportsharesofproductionhavenotdramaticallychangedinthelastdecadesformostagriculturalcommodities.Onlysomecountries,suchasArgentina,AustraliaandtheUnitedStateshavenetexportsthatreach50percentoftheirdomesticsupply.25Ontheimportside,onlyafewcountriesfromtheNearEastandNorthAfricahavenetimportsthatreach50percentoftheirdomesticfoodsupply.However,responsiveworldmarketsandaccesstotraderemaindecisivetoensurethatfoodisavailableinatimelymanner.
Inthecontextofclimatechangeandtheresultingnegativeeffectonagriculturalproductivityinlowlatituderegions,internationaltradecouldbeapotentiallypowerfuladaptationinstrumenttoevenoutsupplyfluctuationsacrosstheglobeandtoreducemarketinstability.Tofulfilthisbeneficialpoolingfunctiontothemaximumdegree,tradehastobeabletoflowsmoothlybetweennations.Furthermore,fromariskmanagementperspective,thereisevidencethattraderestrictivepolicieshavesignificantnegativeimpactsonfoodsecurityinscenariosofdomesticshocks,suchasacropfailureoranaturaldisaster.26Openandpredictabletradepolicieshavethepotentialtoreducethenegativeimpactsonfoodsecurityacrossdiversescenariosandrepresentagoodriskmanagementstrategytoensurethestabilityofmarkets.
Globaltrendsinmarketdemandhavereducedpressuresonprices
Agriculturalworldpriceformationdependsontherelativeforcesofdemandandsupplyinworldmarkets,thatisontheimportsandexportsfromallcountries.In2016,recordproductionandabundantstocksofmostcommodities,keptpricesofthemainagriculturalcommoditieswellbelowthepeaksexperiencedinthelastdecade,inparticularin2008-12.Averagepricesofcereals,meatsanddairyproductscontinuedtodecline,whilepricesofoilseeds,vegetableoils,andsugarsawaslightreboundin2016.
25FAO.2017.TheFutureofFoodandAgriculture:TrendsandChallenges.Rome.26OECD.2015.ManagingFoodInsecurityRisk:AnalyticalFrameworkandApplicationtoIndonesia.
75
100
125
150
175
200
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Agricultural products Manufactures Fuels and mining products
17
Inthemediumterm,between2017and2026,demandgrowthisprojectedtoslowconsiderably,andglobalagriculturalmarketprices(inrealterms)areprojectedtofollowaslightlydecliningtrend.27RisingmeatdemandfromChina,additionalfeedstockinputsforbiofuelsandthereplenishmentofcerealstocks,thathavebeentheprimarysourcesofdemandgrowthinthelastdecade,arenotanticipatedtosupportmarketsinthesamewayoverthemediumterm.Therefore,growthinfooddemandforvirtuallyallcommoditiesisanticipatedtobeslowerthaninthepreviousdecadeand,globally,percapitafooddemandforcerealsislikelytobelargelyflat,withgrowthonlyexpectedinleastdevelopedcountries.
Currently,bothhistoricalandimpliedvolatilityintheworldmarketsofthemaincommoditieshavedeclinedfromtheirpeaksof2008,andwereattheendof2016atthelowerendoftheirhistoricalranges.28Nevertheless,climatechangeandthepotentialincreaseinthefrequencyandintensityofweathereventsmaydisruptmarketsandresultinsignificantpricevolatilityandconsiderablevariationaroundtheprices’projectedlevels.
Figure8.Worldmarketpricesofmaize,1908-2016(realterms)
Source:OECD-FAO.2017.AgriculturalOutlook2017-26.
Pricevolatilitymattersbecauseitcanbeharmfulforpoorconsumersandforfarmers.Suddenhigherpricescanbedisastrousforthepoor,especiallyindevelopingcountrieswhereahighshareoftheirtotalincomeisspentonfood.Lowandvolatilepricesposesignificantproblemstofarmersandotheragentsinthevaluechains,addingriskanduncertaintytotheirreturns,andcreatingdisincentivesforinvestment.Increasingmarkettransparencyandapplyingsensible,moreopenandpredictabletradepoliciesarekeyelementsofanypolicystrategytoreducepricevolatility.29
TheAgriculturalMarketInformationSystem(AMIS)wascreatedin2011toenhancefoodmarkettransparencyandencourageinternationalpolicycoordinationintimesofcrisis.CountriesparticipatinginAMISencompassthemainproducingandconsumingcountriesofmajorfoodcropscoveredbytheinitiative:wheat,maize,riceandsoybeans.TheAMISSecretariat(composedof11internationalorganizations),theGlobalFoodMarketInformationGroupandtheRapidResponse
27OECD-FAO.2017.AgriculturalOutlook2017-26.28AgriculturalMarketsInformationSystem(AMIS)MarketMonitorNo57.November2017.29FAO,IFAD,IMF,UNCTAD,WFP,theWorldBank,theWTO,IFPRIandtheUNHLTF.2011.PricevolatilityinFoodandAgriculturalMarkets:PolicyResponses.InteragencyPolicyReportfortheG20AgricultureDeputies.
18
Forumhavebeenmeetingregularly,producingandpubliclydisseminatingmarketandpolicyinformationtoallagents.
Globalfoodtradecanbevulnerabletophysicalpointsalongtraderoutesthathandlehighvolumesofimportantcommodities.Thesearemaritimechokepoints(straitsandcanals),coastalchokepoints(ports)andinlandchokepoints(roads,railwaysandwaterways).30Asclimatechangetakeshold,theriskofdisruptiontofoodtradechokepointsmayincrease.Currentassessmentsfocusonconditionsandpoliciesthatinfluenceexposuretosupplyorpriceshocks,butdataonpatternsoftransportationoffoodandanalysisofthesystemicimportanceoftradechokepointstofoodmarketsarelacking.Againstthisbackground,theSecretariatoftheAgriculturalMarketInformationSystem(AMIS)iscurrentlyconsideringtoexpanditsactivitiestoincludetheassessmentofchokepointdisruptionrisk,andtomonitorchokepointperformancebycollatingdataonthroughput,congestionandclimateresilience.31
30Bailey,R.,andL.Wellesley.2017.ChokepointsandVulnerabilitiesinGlobalFoodTrade.ChathamHouseReport,RoyalInstituteofInternationalAffairs.31ChathamHouse.2018.AnanalysisandproposalofhowthemonitoringoffoodtradechokepointscanbeincorporatedintotheworkprogrammeoftheAgriculturalMarketInformationSystem(AMIS),preparedforthe7thsessionoftheAMISRapidResponseForum,Rosario:Argentina,15March2018.
19
Soils:ahiddenpotentialifwellmanaged
Increasingpopulationandeconomicgrowthareestimatedtoresultina50percentincreaseinthedemandforfoodby2050.Thereislittlescopetoexpandtheagriculturalarea,exceptinsomepartsofAfricaandSouthAmerica.Muchoftheadditionalavailablelandisnotsuitableforagriculture,andtheecological,socialandeconomiccostsofbringingitintoproductionwillbeveryhigh.32Inaddition,approximately33percentoftheworld’ssoilresourcesaremoderatelytohighlydegraded.33
Soilsarethefoundationoffoodproductionandmanyessentialecosystemservices.Indeed,the
2030AgendaandtheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsidentifytheneedtorestoredegradedsoilsandimprovesoilhealth.Unlockingthefullpotentialofsoilswillnotonlysupportfoodsecurityandnutrition,butwillalsocontributetowardsstoringandsupplyingmorecleanwater,maintainingbiodiversity,sequesteringcarbon,andincreasingresilienceinachangingclimate.
Thecurrentsituationisexpectedtoworsenunlessintensiveactionsaretakentomitigatesoil
threats.Withtheurgentneedtoeliminatehungerandensurefoodsecurityandnutrition,itiscrucialnotonlytounderstand,butalsoactivelyworktowardsmanagementpracticesthatrespecttheimportanceoftheroleofsoilsinfoodproductionandaretailoredtotheirdiversechemical,physicalandbiologicalproperties.Sustainablesoilmanagement(SSM)34embodiessuchanapproachandhasthepotentialtoaidclimatechangemitigationandadaptation.
3.1. Statusofglobalsoils Anumberofglobalsoilthreatshavebeenidentifiedwithsoilerosion,soilorganiccarbon
(SOC)change,andnutrientimbalancehavingthelargestimpactatthegloballevel.35Otherthreats,thattendtobemorecountryorregionspecific,includesoilsalinisationandsodification,soilsealingandlandtake,lossofbiodiversity,soilcontamination,acidification,compaction,andwaterlogging.Unsustainablepractices,includingforlanduse/coverchange(LUCC),areamongthemaindriversbehindthesethreats.
Soilerosion
Soilerosionortheacceleratedlossoftopsoilfromthelandsurfacethroughdifferentmechanisms,suchasairandwater,hasdirectandnegativeimpactsonglobalagriculture.Inthelong-term,thelossoftopsoilcanresultinthereductionofthesoil’scapacitytoproviderootingspaceandtostoreandcyclewater.Erosion,specificallywatererosion,leadstolossesofnutrients,whichthenneedtobereplacedthroughfertilization,oftenatasignificantcost.Insomecases,when
32AvailablelandisassessedthroughtheGlobalAgro-EcologicalZones(GAEZv3.0)analysis.TheGAEZ,combiningsoil,terrainandclimatecharacteristicswithcropproductionrequirements,estimatesthesuitabilityforcropproduction.SeealsoAlexandratos,N.andJ.Bruinsma.2012.Worldagriculturetowards2030/2050:the2012revision.ESAWorkingpaperNo.12-03.Rome,FAO.33FAO-ITPS.2015.StatusoftheWorld’sSoilResources.Rome.34AccordingtothedefinitionofSustainableSoilManagement(SSM)bytheIntergovernmentalTechnicalPanelonSoils(ITPS),soilmanagementissustainableifthesupporting,provisioning,regulating,andculturalservicesprovidedbysoilsaremaintainedorenhancedwithoutsignificantlyimpairingeitherthesoilfunctionsthatenablethoseservicesorbiodiversity.Thebalancebetweenthesupportingandprovisioningservicesforplantproductionandtheregulatingservicesthesoilprovidesforwaterqualityandavailabilityandforatmosphericgreenhousegascompositionisaparticularconcern.Supportingservicesincludeprimaryproduction,nutrientcyclingandsoilformation;Provisioningservicescomprisethesupplyoffood,fibre,fuel,timberandwater;rawearthmaterial;surfacestability;habitatandgeneticresources;Regulatingservicesimplytheregulationofaspectssuchaswatersupplyandquality,carbonsequestration,climateregulation,controloffloodsanderosion;andCulturalservicesdenotetheaestheticandculturalbenefitsderivedfromsoiluse.35FAO-ITPS.2015.StatusoftheWorld’sSoilResources.Rome.
20
thenutrientsarenotreplaced,cropyieldscanbegreatlyaffected.Soilerosionalsohasnegativeimpactsonwaterqualityasthesedimentsandnutrientsfromerosionaredeposedinwaterbodies.
Soilerosionbywaterisproblematicinmuchofthehillyareasthatareusedascroplandsonall
continents.Thehighestratesofsoilerosionbywatermainlyoccuroncroplandintropicalareas.Rangelandsandpasturelandsinhillytropicalandsub-tropicalareasmayalsosuffersimilarerosionrates.Intemperateareas,soilerosioncanalsobesignificant,evenwheretherehavebeenconservationefforts,asintheMid-WestofUnitedStates.CroplandinEuropeischaracterizedbysomewhatlower,yetstillsignificantsoilerosionrates(Figure9).
Figure9.Spatialvariationofsoilerosionbywater.
Source:VanOost,K.,Quine,T.A.,Govers,G.,DeGryze,S.,Six,J.,Harden,J.W.,Ritchie,J.C.,McCarty,G.W.,Heckrath,G.,Kosmas,C.,Giraldez,J.V.,MarquesdaSilva,J.R.&Merckx,R.2007.Theimpactofagriculturalsoilerosionontheglobalcarboncycle.Science,318(5850):626-629;FAO-ITPS.2015.StatusoftheWorld’sSoilResources.Rome.
Theeffectofsoilerosiononindividualsoilpropertiesrelatedtocropproductioniswelldocumented,buttheaggregateeffectofsoillossoncropyieldsthemselvesislessfirmlyestablished.Accordingtotheintegrativestudies36thathavebeenundertaken,therangeofestimatesofannualcroplossduetoerosionrangesfrom0.1percentto0.4percent,withtwostudiesestimatinga0.3percentyieldreduction.
Ifthemedianvalueof0.3percentannualcroplossisvalidfortheperiodfrom2015to2050,atotalreductionof10.25percentcouldbeprojectedto2050(assumingnootherchangessuchasthe
36Crosson,P.2003.Globalconsequencesoflanddegradation:Aneconomicperspective.InK.Wiebe,ed.LandQuality,AgriculturalProductivity,andFoodSecurity.pp.36-46.UK,Cheltenham,EdwardElgar;Scherr,S.J.2003.Productivity-relatedeconomicimpactsofsoildegradationindevelopingcountries:anevaluationofregionalexperience.InK.Wiebe,ed.LandQuality,AgriculturalProductivity,andFoodSecurity.pp.223-261.UK,Cheltenham,EdwardElgar;DenBiggelaar,C.,Lal,R.,Eswaran,H.,Breneman,V.E.&Reich,P.F.2003.Croplossestosoilerosionatregionalandglobalscales:evidencefromplot-levelandGISdata.InK.Wiebe,ed.LandQuality,AgriculturalProductivity,andFoodSecurity.pp.223-261.UK,Cheltenham,EdwardElgar,Bakker,M.M.,Govers,G.&Rounsevell,M.D.A.2004.Thecropproductivity-erosionrelationship:ananalysisbasedonexperimentalwork.Catena,57(1):55-76;FAO-ITPS.2015StatusoftheWorld’sSoilResources.Rome.
21
adoptionofadditionalconservationmeasuresbyfarmers).Suchalossof10.25percentofyieldduetoerosionwouldbeequivalenttotheremovalof150millionhectaresfromcropproductionfromatotalof1.53billionhectaresglobally(equivalentto4.5millionhectaresperyear.)37
Soilorganiccarbon(SOC)loss
Soilorganiccarbon(SOC)losstakesplacewhensoilcarbonisconvertedtogreenhousegases:carbondioxide(CO2)ormethane(CH4).Soilsconstitutethelargestterrestrialcarbonpoolandplaycrucialrolesintheglobalcarbonbalancebyregulatingdynamicbiogeochemicalprocessesandtheexchangeofgreenhousegases(GHGs)withtheatmosphere.Declinesoforganiccarbonstocknegativelyaffectthesoil’sfertilityandclimatechangeregulationcapacity.SOCstocksareespeciallysensitiveandresponsivetochangesinlanduse(LUCC),forexample,fromanaturalstatetoanagriculturalecosystemorfromforesttocropland.
Insub-SaharanAfrica,SOClossgenerallyoccursasaresultofthereplacementofnatural
vegetation,completecropbiomassremovalfromfarmlands,andbythehighrateoforganicmatterdecompositionbymicrobialcommunities,ariskthatisincreasedbyhighertemperatures.InAsia,itisduetotheusageofcropresiduesasfuelorfodderasopposedtobeingreturnedtothesoil,andtothedegradationofgrasslands.InEurope,drainageofpeatlandhasledtoorganiccarbonloss.InLatinAmericaandtheCaribbean,itoccursasaresultofdeforestation,theploughingofgrasslandsandmonoculture.IntheNearEastandNorthAfricaregion,itismostlythehightemperaturewhichcausesahighturnoverofSOC,andthechangestosoilmanagementpracticeswhichresultinSOClosses.InNorthAmerica,themainconcernisthelossofSOCfromnorthernandarcticsoilsduetoclimatechange.Lastly,intheSouthwestPacific,itismostlytheconversionoflandforagriculturalusesthathascausedthelargestlosses.(Figure10)
Nutrientimbalance
Finally,thelastmajorglobalthreatrelatedtosoils,nutrientimbalance,iswhennutrientinputsoradditionsinthesoilareeitherinsufficientorinexcess.Onaglobalscale,soilnutrientbalancesfornitrogen(N)andphosphorus(P)arepositiveforallcontinentsexceptforAntarctica.38Positivenutrientbalancesarerepresentativeofinefficientnaturalresourceuseandcanleadtocropfailure,aswellaswaterandatmosphericpollution.
37FAO-ITPS.2015.StatusoftheWorld’sSoilResources.Rome38Bouwman,A.F.,Beusen,A.H.W.,&Billen,G.2009.Humanalterationoftheglobalnitrogenandphosphorussoilbalancesfortheperiod1970-2050.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,23(4),1-16;Bouwman,L.KeesKleinGoldewijk,KlaasW.VanDerHoek,ArthurH.W.Beusen,DetlefP.VanVuuren,JaapWillems,MarianaC.Rufino,andElkeStehfest.2013.Exploringglobalchangesinnitrogenandphosphoruscyclesinagricultureinducedbylivestockproductionoverthe1900–2050period.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences,110(52)20882-20887.
22
Figure10:Spatialvariationofsoilorganiccarboninthefirst30cm.
Source:FAO-ITPS.2018.GlobalSoilorganicCarbonMap.Rome,Italy.Themapwaspreparedbymembercountriesunderstandardtechnicalspecifications.
Phosphorusbalanceshavebeendecliningindevelopedcountries.Historically,mostofthesecountrieshavemaintainedhighphosphorussurpluslevels,soreductionsarenotaffectingyields(Figure11).Nitrogenismoremobile,thereforereducingitsapplicationrateischallenging.Thisisreflectedinthemixedresultsacrosscountriesandlowerdecliningrates.NitrogensurplusreductionsinEuropeancountrieshavemainlybeenachievedbyreducingNfertilizeruse,whileinCanadaandtheUnitedStatesofAmericareductionscomemainlyfromcropmixandlivestockcompositionchanges.
Anegativenutrientbalance,ontheotherhand,canadverselyimpactplantgrowthandcrop
nutritionalvalue,aswellasreducetheprovisioningofecosystemservicesthatrelyonnutrientsfortheircompletion.ThemainregionsaffectedbynutrientdepletionarelocatedinAfrica,AsiaandSouthAmerica.InAfrica,allbutthreecountriesextractmorenutrientsfromthesoileachyearthanarereturnedthroughuseoffertilizer,cropresidues,manure,andotherorganicmatter.Nutrientimbalancecontributestofoodinsecurity,asinsufficientnutrientshindercropdevelopmentandyieldgrowth,andtowaterandatmosphericpollution,throughlossesofthesenutrientstotheenvironment.
23
Figure11.Nitrogenandphosphorusbalanceperhectareofagriculturalland,selectedG20countries:2002-2014
Note:n.c.:notcalculated.Balance(surplusordeficit)expressedaskgnitrogenorphosphorusperhectareoftotalagriculturalland.Countriesarerankedindescendingorderaccordingtoaverageannualpercentagechange2002-04to2012-14.TheEU15totalexcludesLuxembourg.Source:OECDAgri-Environmentalindicators:Nutrientshttp://stats.oecd.org//Index.aspx?QueryId=79764&lang=en
3.2. Impactsofsoildegradation Soildegradationandtheresultingeffectonagriculturalproductivityandecosystemservices,
haveamajorimpactonfoodsecurityandnutrition.Insub-SaharanAfrica,inparticular,itisconsideredakeydriverofstagnatinganddecliningagriculturalproductivity.Acontinuingdeclineinsoilproductivitypresentsasignificantsocio-economicriskthatcouldimpacttheeconomiesoflow-incomecountriesandthelivesofmillionsofruralhouseholdsthataredependentonagriculturefortheirlivelihoodneeds.
Aspopulationandsubsequently,fooddemandrises,agriculturalproductivitygrowthrequires
thesustainablemanagementofnaturalresourcesand,inparticular,soilsandfertileland.Availabilityofnewlandinmanycountriesislimitedtothatofmarginalquality,withresultinglowproductivity.Localmineraldeficienciesinsoilsproducedeficienciesinfoodsystems,whichclinicallyimpactpopulations.Over2billionpeoplesufferfrommicronutrientdeficienciesandsoilsareanimportantfactor:mostessentialnutrientsandminerals(e.g.zinc,iron,iodine)cannotbederivedfrombiosynthesisandmustbeobtainedbyplantsfromsoils.Inturn,theseareacquiredbyhumansthroughthefoodtheyconsume.Soildegradationleadstolargelossesofproductivityandfertileland,furthercompoundingthechallengeofsoilquality,landavailabilityandfoodsecurity.Often,therearealsonegativeimpactsonwaterquality,asthesedimentsandnutrientsfromerosionaredeposedinwaterbodies,withthisincreasedpollutioncausingdeclinesinfishandotherspecies.
Av erage annual
% change
Av erage annual
% change
2002-04 2012-142002-04 to 2012-
142002-04 2012-14
2002-04 to 2012-
14
Turkey 24 25 0.6 Turkey 6 7 1.1
Australia 18 19 0.5 Mex ico 2 2 0.2
Korea 240 249 0.4 Korea 49 47 -0.4
Mex ico 23 23 0.2 Japan 66 60 -1.0
Japan 173 176 0.2 Australia 1 1 -1.6
Italy 72 72 0.0 United States 4 3 -2.4
Canada 30 28 -0.5 United Kingdom 6 4 -4.3
United Kingdom 71 65 -0.9 Germany 3 2 -5.5
Germany 100 91 -1.0 EU15 (1) 7 3 -9.4
United States 35 31 -1.2 Canada 3 1 -13.7
EU15 85 70 -1.9 France 6 1 -14.4
France 61 48 -2.3 Italy 4 -2 n.c.
Av erage (kg nitrogen/ha)
Av erage (kg phosphorus/ha)
-2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5
Nitrogen balance
2002-04 to 2012-14
% -15 -10 -5 0 5
Phosphorus balance
2002-04 to 2012-14
%
24
Inadditiontotheimpactsthatsoilscanhaveonfoodsecurity,theyalsoholdanimportantroleinclimateprocessesastheyregulategreenhousegasemissions(carbondioxide[CO2],nitrousoxide[N2O],andmethane[CH4]).Beingamajorterrestrialreservoirofcarbon,theycanhaveahugeinfluenceontheconcentrationofgreenhousegasesintheatmosphereand,ifmanagedproperly,certainsoilscanactascarbonsinks.However,ifmismanaged,soilscanalsoreleasecarbondioxideintotheatmosphereasaresultof,forexample,landusechangeandpoorsoilmanagementpractices.Risingglobaltemperaturesarealsoincreasingtheamountsreleased,aswarmersoilsreleasemorecarbon.
Theeffectsofclimatechangeitself,suchashighertemperaturesandextremeweatherevents
(droughts,floods,storms),impactonsoilquantityandfertility,beingfurtherdriversofsoilchange.Theinteractionsandsensitivitiesbetweentheclimatesystemandsoilprocessesareevident.Consideringthegrowingdemandsonlandareaandtheexpectedincreaseddegradationofsoilsasaresultofclimatechange,sustainablesoilmanagementpracticeswillbekeyinfosteringcarbonsequestrationandimprovingsoilhealth(suchpracticesincludecovercrops,improvedfallowplantspeciesandreducedorno-tillagepracticestoensurethesoilhasasufficientorganiccover).
Theannualcostoflanddegradationduetolanduseandcoverchange(LUCC),includingthatoflanddegradingmanagementpracticesonstaticcropandgrazingland,isestimatedtobeaboutUS$300billion.39Thisdoesnothowever,includetheimpactonecosystemserviceswhichwouldincreasecostssignificantly.TheinvestmentsneededtocompletelyrehabilitatelanddegradationduetoLUCCinallworldregionsareestimatedatUS$4.6trillionover6years.Duringthesameperiod,ifactionisnottakentorehabilitatedegradedlands,theworldwillincuralossofUS$14trillion,allofwhichsuggeststhattheinvestmenthasaverypositivereturn.Amainquestionthenishowtomobilizetheresourcesneededtofinancethoseinvestments.
3.3. Sustainablesoilmanagementpractices Foodproductionreliesonsoilsasakeynaturalresource:nutritiousandqualityfoodand
animalfoddercanonlybeproducedifoursoilsarehealthy.Ahealthylivingsoilisthereforeacrucialallytofoodsecurityandnutrition.Numerousanddiversefarmingapproachespromotesomeoftheprinciplesofsustainablesoilmanagementwiththegoalofimprovingproductivityandprotectingsoilsandtheenvironment,forinstance:agroecology,conservationagriculture,organicfarming,minimum/zerotillagefarmingandagroforestry.
Agroecologyusesecologicaltheorytostudyandmanageagriculturalsystemsinorderto
makethembothmoreproductiveandbetteratconservingnaturalresources.Thiswholesystemsapproachtoagricultureandfoodsystemsdevelopmentisbasedonawidevarietyoftechnologies,practicesandinnovations,includinglocalandtraditionalknowledgeaswellasmodernscience.Byunderstandingandworkingwiththeinteractionsbetweenplants,animals,humansandtheenvironmentwithinagriculturalsystems,agroecologyencompassesmultipledimensionsofthefoodsystem,includingecological,economicandsocial.
39Nkonya,E.,A.MirzabaevandJ.vonBraun(eds).2016.EconomicsofLandDegradationandImprovement–AGlobalAssessmentforSustainableDevelopment.InternationalFoodPolicyResearchInstitute(IFPRI)andCenterforDevelopmentResearch(ZEF).UniversityofBonn.SpringerOpen.
25
Organicfarmingisagriculturalproductionwithouttheuseofsyntheticchemicalsorgeneticallymodifiedorganisms,growthregulators,andlivestockfeedadditives.Italsoemphasisesaholisticfarmmanagementapproach,whererotationsandanimalsplayanintegralroletothesystem.Soilfertilityisthecornerstoneoforganicmanagement.Becauseorganicfarmersdonotusesyntheticnutrientstorestoredegradedsoil,theymustconcentrateonbuildingandmaintainingsoilfertilityprimarilythroughtheirbasicfarmingpractices.Evidencefromresearch,fieldtrialsandfarmexperienceshowsthatorganicfarmingis,overall,moreenvironmentallyfriendlythanconventionalagriculturebutitseconomicperformanceismoreuncertain.
Conservationagriculturepracticeshavesignificantlyimprovedsoilconditions,reducedland
degradationandboostedyieldsinmanypartsoftheworldbyfollowingthreeprinciples:minimalsoildisturbance,permanentsoilcoverandcroprotations.Tobesustainableinthelongterm,thelossoforganicmatterinanyagriculturalsystemmustneverexceedtherateofsoilformation.Inmostagro-ecosystems,thisisnotpossibleifthesoilismechanicallydisturbed.Therefore,oneofthetenetsofconservationagricultureislimitingtheuseofmechanicalsoildisturbance,ortilling,inthefarmingprocess.Theeconomicattractivenessofsoilconservationishighlysite-specificbutbringspositiveenvironmentalimpacts.40
Zerotillageisoneofasetoftechniquesusedinconservationagriculture.Essentially,it
maintainsapermanentorsemi-permanentorganicsoilcover(e.g.agrowingcropordeadmulch)thatprotectsthesoilfromsun,rainandwindandallowssoilmicroorganismsandfaunatotakeonthetaskof“tilling”andsoilnutrientbalancing-naturalprocessesthataredisturbedbymechanicaltillage.Theapplicationofmodernbiotechnologyinagriculturehasresultedinfacilitationofzero-tillagesystemsforsomecrops.However,environmentalbenefitsarecontext-specificandheavilydependentonmanagementpracticesastheuseofherbicidesonherbicide-tolerantvarietiesmaycompromisesoilbiodiversity.
Agroforestrysystemsincludebothtraditionalandmodernland-usesystemswheretreesare
managedtogetherwithcropsand/oranimalproductionsystemsinagriculturalsettings.Thecombinationoftrees,cropsandlivestockmitigatesenvironmentalrisk,createsapermanentsoilcoveragainsterosion,minimisesdamagefromfloodingandactsaswaterstorage,benefittingcropsandpastures.
Integratedsoilfertilitymanagement(ISFM)isacombinationofajudiciousamountof
inorganicfertilizerwithorganicinputs.41ISFMhasbeenshowntobemoreprofitableandsustainablethanbothorganicfarmingandtheapplicationofinorganicfertilizeraloneatrecommendedorhigherrates.42
40OECD.2016.FarmManagementPracticestoFosterGreenGrowth.OECDGreenGrowthStudies.OECDPublishing,Paris.41Vanlauwe,B.,A.B.Bationo,J.N.Chianu,K.E.Giller,R.Merckx,U.Mokwunye,O.Ohiokpehai,etal.2010.IntegratedSoilFertilityManagementOperationalDefinitionandConsequencesforImplementationandDissemination.OutlookonAgriculture,39(1):17–24.42NkonyaE.andJ.Koo.2017.TheUnholyCross:ProfitabilityandAdoptionofClimate-SmartAgriculturePracticesinAfricaSouthoftheSahara.InDePinto,A.,andJ.M.Ulimwengu(Eds).AThrivingAgriculturalSectorinaChangingClimate:MeetingMalaboDeclarationGoalsthroughClimate-SmartAgriculture.ReSAKSSAnnualTrendsandOutlookReport2016.Washington,DC:InternationalFoodPolicyResearchInstitute:103-113.
26
Box4:SoilManagementProgrammes
Therearecurrentlyanumberofsuccessfuldevelopmentprogrammes,invariousregionsandcountries,withaspecificfocusonsustainablesoilmanagement.
InAfrica,theAGRASoilHealthProgrammeaimstoincreaseincomesandfoodsecuritybypromotingthewideadoptionofintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement(ISFM)practicesamongsmallholderfamilyfarmers.Theobjectiveistoimprovesupplyandaccesstoappropriatefertilizers,aswellasaccesstoknowledgeonISFM.Currently1.8millionsmallholdersarereportedtobeusingISFM,includingfertilizermicro-dosing,manure,andlegumesincroprotations,withyieldsintheSahelupthreetofourfoldingoodseasons.
TheAgWaterSolutionsProject,anotherinitiativeinAfrica,promotessmall-scaledistributedirrigationsystemsthatrelyprimarilyongroundwater.TheprojecthasalotofpotentialincountriessuchasBurkinaFasoandishelpingtoshifttheattentionofpolicymakersandplannersawayfromlargescaleirrigationdevelopments.
IntheNearEastandNorthAfrica(NENA)region,consideredtobethemostaridregionintheworld,MENARID(IntegratedNaturalResourcesManagementintheMiddleEastandNorthAfrica)isapartnershipworkingforimprovementofthegovernanceofnaturalresources,includingwater.Theprogrammeaimstoimprovethelivelihoodsoftargetcommunitiesthroughtherestorationofdegradednaturalresources,includinglandandsoils.
Theregionswiththelargestchallengesinrelationtosoildegradationareoftenthosefacingmanyotherdifficulties,includingrapidpopulationgrowth,conflictandpoliticalunrest,andhighvulnerabilitytoclimatevariability.Implementingsuchprogrammescanbeespeciallydifficult,butalsoextremelyimportantasthesearetheregionsthatalsofacethebiggestchallengeswithrelationtofoodsecurityandnutrition.
IntheUnitedStatesofAmerica,anumberofagri-environmentalprogrammesareinplace,amongthem:i)working-landprogrammessuchastheEnvironmentalQualityIncentivesProgram(EQIP)andtheConservationStewardshipProgram(CSP)providefinancialassistancetofarmerswhoadopt,install,ormaintainconservationpracticessuchasconservationtillage,nutrientmanagement,integratedpestmanagementonlandinproduction;and,ii)landretirementprogrammesliketheConservationReserveProgram(CRP)removelandfromagriculturalproductionforatleast10yearsandsupporthigh-priority,partial-fieldpractices,suchasfield-edgefilterstripsandgrasswaterways.Crosscomplianceapproachesarealsousedtocontrolsoilerosion.
IntheEuropeanUnion(EU),MemberStateshavethefreedomtoimplementpoliciestoprotectsoilsaccordingtotheneedsandspecificgeo-climaticandfarmingconditionsintheirterritories.AgriculturalsoilprotectionisattheinterfaceofseveralEUmainpolicypackages.IntheEUCommonAgriculturalPolicy(CAP)aspectsofsoilprotectionhavebeenanintegralpartofGoodAgriculturalandEnvironmentalConditions(GAEC)sincetheintroductionofcrosscompliancein2003,andseveralofagri-environmentalmeasurescoveractionstoconservesoils.Inaddition,theSoilThematicStrategywasintroducedin2014,andsoilmanagementisalsoaffectedbyanumberofenvironmentalpoliciessuchastheNitratesandWaterDirectives.
27
Theprovisionofecosystemservices,includingthroughenvironmentalpaymentsandregulations,canfacilitatetheadoptionofsustainablesoilpractices(seeBox4).Governmentsshouldpromotethecreationanddisseminationofcredible,science-basedinformationonfarmer-andscience-ledfarmmanagementpractices.ThekeyingredientsforpersuadingandenablingfarmerstoadoptSSMpracticesarecredible,relevantandup-to-datebusiness-acumenadvice,trainingandextension.43
Paymentsunderenvironmentalprogrammesarevoluntaryforfarmers.ForcompliancewiththeWTOtheymustmeetspecificcriteria.Oftentheadoptionofsuchsustainablepracticesmayleadtoaninitiallossofproductivityandincome.ToqualifyasenvironmentalprogrammeconsistentwiththerequirementsspecifiedintheWTOAgreementonAgriculture(AoA),oneimportantcriterionisthattheamountofthepaymentmustbelimitedtothe“extracostsorlossofincomeinvolvedwithcomplyingwiththegovernmentprogramme”(paragraph12(b)ofAnnex2oftheAoA).
IntheUnitedStatesofAmericaandothercountriessuchcost-shareprogramsforestablishing
conservationpracticesonagriculturallandhavesupportedimplementationoffarmingpracticesandstructuresthatreducelossoffertilitythroughsoilerosion;facilitateimproveddrainage,waterstorage,andmoreefficientirrigation;and,providemanurestorageandassistancewithmeetingnutrientmanagementregulations.44Theeffectivenessandefficiencyofvoluntarypaymentprogrammesaredifficulttoassess.Environmentalbenefitswillberealisedonlyifpaymentsmadetofarmersleveragetheadoptionofconservationpracticesthatwouldnothavebeenadoptedotherwise.45
Thecosteffectivenessofagri-environmentalpaymentstopromotesoilmanagementcouldbe
improvedbydirectlylinkingincentivestoenvironmentaloutcomes.46Thiscanbedonethroughusingproxies,likeanenvironmentalbenefitindex,whereverdataavailabilityallowsthis.Inthecasethatmultiplepolicyinstrumentsarecombined,theyshouldcomplementandnotconflictwitheachother.
Insomecountries,theprovisionofpaymentstofarmersisconditionalonproducersfollowing
specifiedfarmmanagementpractices.Thisenvironmentalcross-complianceisrequired,withthepolicyactingascompensationtomeetregulatoryrequirements.IntheEU,forexample,thescopeofenvironmentalcrosscomplianceincludeswaterpollution,soilqualityandsoilerosion,protectionoflandscapefeaturesandavoidingabandonmentofland.IntheUnitedStatesofAmericaitincludessoilerosionandwetlandpreservation,andinSwitzerlanditincludesenvironmentallysustainableuseoflandforfarming,biodiversityandanimalwelfare.47Otherthingsbeingequal,withrespecttofurtheringenvironmentalobjectives,targetedmeasuresarelikelytobemoreefficientandcosteffectiveinachievingspecificenvironmentalaimsthancross-complianceapproaches.48
43OECD.2015.FosteringGreenGrowthinAgriculture:TheRoleofTraining,AdvisoryServicesandExtensionInitiatives,OECDGreenGrowthStudies.OECDPublishing,Paris44Claassen,R.Duquette,E.,HorowitzJ.2013.Additionalityinagriculturalconservationpaymentprograms.JournalofSoilandWaterConservation,68(3),74A-78A.45Claassen,R.2012.AdditionalityinUSagri-environmentalprogrammesforworkingland:Apreliminarylookatnewdata.InOECD.2012.EvaluationofAgri-EnvironmentalPolicies:SelectedMethodologicalIssuesandCaseStudies.OECDPublishing.46OECD.2010.EnvironmentalCrossComplianceinAgriculture.Paris;OECD.2012.EvaluationofAgri-EnvironmentalPolicies:SelectedMethodologicalIssuesandCaseStudies.OECDPublishing.47OECD.2010.EnvironmentalCrossComplianceinAgriculture.Paris.48OECD.2013.GlobalFoodSecurity:ChallengesfortheFoodandAgricultureSystem.Paris.
28
3.4. RoleofInformationCommunicationTechnology(ICT) Inadditionto,orcomplementingsustainablesoilmanagementpractices,manyexistingand
importanttoolscanbeusedforsoilconservation,suchasInformationandCommunicationTechnology(ICT).Inthecontextofincreasingdigitalizationoftheeconomyandthesociety,ICTsarecrucialinassessingnaturalresourcesandprovidinginformationtotackleclimatechange.
Overthelasttwentyyears,farmersindevelopedcountrieshavealreadybeenusingICTsin
largescalefarmingforPrecisionAgriculture(PA)49includinginsoilanalysis,irrigation,farmingequipment,weatherforecasting,andmore.Thefastpaceoftechnologicaldevelopment,whichallowsforincreasingdatastorageandanalyticsandprogressivelylowercostshashelpedsupportthesefarmingadvances.
WhilethemainincentivetoadoptPrecisionAgriculture(PA)methodsistomaximiseprofitability,itcanalsoreduceenvironmentalimpactsoffarmingpractices.TheapproachiscurrentlyusedmainlybylargearablefarmsinCentralandNorthernEurope,theUSA,CanadaandAustralia,andithasthepotentialtoexpandintoemergingeconomieslikeIndia.AsuccessfulexampleoftheapplicationofthismethodistheuseofControlledTrafficFarming,whichreducescropdamageandsoilcompactionasitconfinesfieldvehiclestotheminimalareaofpermanenttrafficlaneswiththeaidofGlobalNavigationSatelliteSystem(GNSS)technologyanddecisionsupportsystems.FarmersinAustraliaandtheUKhavebeenabletoreducemachineryandinputcostsandincreasecropyields.
Inmanydevelopingcountries,however,thedigitaldivideisnowheremoreevidentthaninagriculture.Thisisnotonlyduetothedifferentextenttowhichdigitaltechnologieshavepenetratedruralareasacrossthedevelopedeconomiesandthedevelopingworld,butalsoduetodifferentfarmstructures.Openaccessresources,particularlymobilephoneapplications,arevitalintheprovisionofinformationandknowledge.Forexample,theapplicationOpenForis50allowsevenasmallfamilyfarmerequippedwithasmartphonetobettermeasureandmonitorapieceoflandnobiggerthananacre.Otherapplications,suchastherecentlylaunchedSoilOrganicCarbonApp,51allowinvestorstoassesstowhatextentplannedeffortstorestoredegradedlandwillbindorganiccarboninsoilandmitigateclimatechange.
TechnologiessuchasDigitalSoilMapping(DSM)andsoilsensorsallowforinnovativebottom-upapproachestocharacterizesoils.Suchtechnologycanbeutilisedinefficientandprecisedecisionmakingonthefarm,andiskeytoadvancingsoilresearchandprovidinglocationspecificadvicebyextensionservicestoadoptbestpractices.ICTscanalsoprovidedigitalplatformsforcooperationandcollaborationbetweenscientistsandotherstakeholders,whichwouldimproveagriculturalpracticesandsoilconservation.52Finally,thedesignandimplementationofenvironmentalpoliciescanalsobenefitfromthesetechnologiesinordertomonitorsoilerosion,SOC,nutrientbalancesandotheragri-environmentalperformanceindicators,andbettertargetingpolicyandlegislationonenvironmentalpracticesindifferentlocations.
49PrecisionAgriculture(PA)isawhole-farmmanagementapproachusinginformationtechnology,satellitepositioning(GNSS)data,remotesensingandproximaldatagathering.50http://www.openforis.org/51https://wle.cgiar.org/solutions/soil-organic-carbon-app52Lin,Yu-Pin,etal.2017.Applicationsofinformationandcommunicationtechnologyforimprovementsofwaterandsoilmonitoringandassessmentsinagriculturalareas—AcasestudyintheTaoyuanirrigationdistrict.Environments,4.1:6.
29
3.5. Ongoingcollectiveresponsesandinternationalgovernance Inrecentyears,significantprogresshasbeenmadeinthesupportofstrategiesandpoliciesto
improvetheglobalgovernanceofsoilresources.Inordertomeettheneedforamultilateralforumfocusingspecificallyonsoilchallengesandtoadvocateforsustainablesoilandlandmanagementatgloballevel,theGlobalSoilPartnership(GSP)wasestablishedbytheFAOCouncilinDecember2012.
GlobalSoilPartnership
TheGSPisaninteractive,responsiveandvoluntarypartnership,opentogovernments,regionalorganizations,institutionsandotherstakeholdersatvariouslevels.Itstrivestoraiseawarenessamongdecisionmakersontheroleofsoilresourcesinrelationtofoodsecurityandclimatechange,andtobuildcapacitiesandexchangeknowledgeandtechnologiesforsustainablemanagementofsoilresources.53
Table2.The5PillarsofActionoftheGlobalSoilPartnership.PillarNo. Action
1 Promotesustainablemanagementofsoilresourcesforsoilprotection,conservationandsustainableproductivity
2 Encourageinvestment,technicalcooperation,policy,educationawarenessandextensioninsoil
3 Promotetargetedsoilresearchanddevelopmentfocusingonidentifiedgapsandprioritiesandonsynergieswithrelatedproductive,environmentalandsocialdevelopmentactions
4 Enhancethequantityandqualityofsoildataandinformation:datacollection,analysis,validation,reporting,monitoringandintegrationwithotherdisciplines
5 Harmonizemethods,measurementsandindicatorsforthesustainablemanagementandprotectionofsoilresources
ThePartnership,beingacommoncommunicationplatformincorporatinglocalchallenges,allowsexperiencestobesharedamongfarmersandscientistsacrosscountriesandregions,anddevelopsglobalgovernanceguidelinesaimingtoimprovedsoilprotectionandsustainablesoilproductivity,inaccordancewiththesovereignrightofeachStateoveritsnaturalresources.Inordertoachieveitsmandate,theGSPaddressesfivepillarsofactiontobeimplementedincollaborationwithitsregionalsoilpartnerships.(Table2).
Anindicationoftheemergingpriorityaccordedtosoils,andameasureoftheimpactoftheGSP
wasthedeclarationbytheUnitedNationsGeneralAssemblyof2015astheInternationalYearofSoilsandtheinitiationoftheUNWorldSoilDay.
53http://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/en/
30
TheIntergovernmentalTechnicalPanelonSoils
TechnicalandscientificguidanceisprovidedbytheIntergovernmentalTechnicalPanelonSoils(ITPS).54ThemainfunctionoftheITPSistoprovidescientificandtechnicaladviceandguidanceonglobalsoilissuestotheGlobalSoilPartnershipprimarilyandtoaddressspecificrequestssubmittedbyglobalorregionalinstitutions.TheITPSadvocatesforaddressingsustainablesoilmanagementinthedifferentsustainabledevelopmentagendas,andcomplementsrelatedscientificadvisorypanelsincludingtheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC),theIntergovernmentalPanelonBiodiversityandEcosystemServices(IPBES),andtheUNCCD’sScience-PolicyInterface(SPI).
TheITPShasbeenkeytothedevelopmentofthePlansofActionforthefivepillarsofthe
GlobalSoilPartnership(Table2).IthasalsobeenengagedinthedevelopmentoftheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsandtheinitiationofformalreportingmechanisms,includingthepublicationofTheStateofWorld’sSoilResources.
TherevisedWorldSoilCharter
TheWorldSoilCharter,adoptedin1981,establishedasetofbroadguidingprinciplesfortheuseoftheworld’ssoilresources,fortheimprovementoftheirproductivity,andfortheirconservationforfuturegenerations.Inviewofnewscientificfindingsandtherapidlychangingenvironmentalandsocialconditionsoftheworld,includingsoilpollutionanditsconsequencesfortheenvironment,urbanizationpressures,andclimatechangeadaptationandmitigation,theChapterwasrevisedin2015,bymeansofextensiveconsultationsorganizedbytheITPS.55TheChartercontainsanumberofkeyprinciplesandgeneralguidelinesandformsanormativeinstrumentforcountriestocharttherequiredpolicymeasuresandconcreteactionprogrammesthatpromotesustainablemanagement,conservationandrestorationofsoils.
TheVoluntaryGuidelinesforSustainableSoilManagement
TheVoluntaryGuidelinesforSustainableSoilManagement(VGSSM)weredevelopedthroughaninclusiveprocesswithintheframeworkoftheGlobalSoilPartnership.Theyaimtobeareferenceprovidinggeneraltechnicalandpolicyrecommendationsonsustainablesoilmanagementforawiderangeofstakeholders,andtocontributetoglobal,regionalandnationaleffortstowardstheeradicationofhungerandpovertyduetotheimportanceofsoilsinsustainabledevelopment.
TheVGSSMareofvoluntarynatureandarenotlegallybinding.Theyelaboratetheprinciples
outlinedintherevisedWorldSoilCharter,andprovideguidanceonhowtotranslatetheseprinciplesintopractice,takingintoaccountthescientificevidence.TheguidelinesaddresstechnicalaspectsofSSMincludingcorecharacteristicsofsustainablymanagedsoils,keychallengesandpotentialsolutionstoaddressthem.
TheVGSSMfocusmostlyonagriculturewhichisbroadlydefinedastheproductionoffood,fibre,feed,timberandfuel,althoughmanyoftheprincipleshaveasignificantinfluenceonecosystemservicesprovidedbymanagedandunmanagedsoilsystems.56
54TheIntergovernmentalTechnicalPanelonSoils(ITPS)wasestablishedatthefirstPlenaryAssemblyoftheGlobalSoilPartnershipheldatFAOHeadquarterson11and12ofJune,2013.TheITPSiscomposedof27topsoilexpertsrepresentingalltheregionsoftheworld.55TherevisedWorldSoilCharterwasendorsedbytheFAOConferenceatits39thsessioninJune2015.FAO(2015).TheRevisedWorldSoilCharter.http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4965e.pdf)56Theguidelineswereadoptedbythe4thGSPPlenaryAssembly(Rome,25May2016),approvedbythe25thsessionoftheFAOCommitteeonAgriculture(Rome,28September2016)andfinallyendorsedbythe155thsessionoftheFAOCouncil(Rome,5December2016).FAOandITPS.2017.VoluntaryGuidelinesforSustainableSoilManagement.Rome.http://www.fao.org/3/a-bl813e.pdf
31
Box5:TheSDGsandsoil
TheGlobalSymposiumonSoilOrganicCarbon
In2017,FAOtogetherwithGSP-ITPS,IPCC,WMOandSPI-UNCCDsuccessfullyorganizedtheGlobalSymposiumonSoilOrganicCarbon(SOC)inordertosetanagendaforactiononSOClosses.Therecommendationsmadebasedonthisconsultationareaimedatsupportingthedevelopmentofpoliciesandactionsandtheimplementationofsoilandlandmanagementstrategiesthatfostertheprotection,sequestration,measurement,mapping,monitoringandreportingofSOC.57
4/1000initiative:SoilsforFoodSecurityandClimate
Francelaunchedthe“4/1000initiative:soilsforfoodsecurityandclimate”inDecember2015,aspartoftheCOP21.Theinitiativeaimstofostersoilorganiccarbonsequestrationbylookingattheannualgrowthrateofthesoilcarbonstockanditsimportanceinincreasingsoilfertility,agriculturalproduction,andcarbonsequestration.Soildegradationisanissueandpotentialthreatinover40percentofglobalsoils,andthe4/1000initiativeaimsatengagingstakeholdersinshiftingtowardssustainablesoilmanagementinordertoavoidtheconsequencesonagriculturalproduction,foodsecurityandclimatechange.Theinitiativehasalreadyestablisheditsforumandconsortiumandisplanningimplementationactivitieswithpartners.58
57FAO,GlobalSoilPartnership,IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange,IntergovernmentalTechnicalPanelonSoils,Science-PolicyInterfaceoftheUNCCD,UnitedNationsConventiontoCombatDesertification,andtheWorldMeteorologicalOrganization.2017.UnlockingthePotentialofSoilOrganicCarbon:OutcomeDocument.Rome.58https://www.4p1000.org/
In2016,theUnitedNationsadopted17SustainableDevelopmentgoals,withaviewtomobilisingeffortstoendallformsofpoverty,fightinequalitiesandtackleclimatechange,whileensuringthatnooneisleftbehind.TheadoptionoftheSDG’srepresentedanopportunityforsoil-relatedissuestobeincludedinintergovernmentalprocesses.ThiswasexplicitlyrecognisedthroughtheinclusionofTarget15.3“By2030,combatdesertification,restoredegradedlandandsoil,includinglandaffectedbydesertification,droughtandfloods,andstrivetoachievealanddegradation-neutralworld”butthesustainablemanagementofsoilsalsohasthepotentialtocontributedirectlytoareasofimportanceforadditionalSDGs,forexample:
• Foodsecurityandnutrition(SDGs1,2and3)–Restorationofsoilproductivityandecosystemfunctionsthroughprecisionagriculture,soilnutrientmanagementandincreasingnutrientandwateruseefficiencycanimprovefoodsecurityandnutrition.
• Health(SDG3)–Soilssustainlifebyprovidingnotonlyfoodandwater,butalsobybeingasourceofmanyessentialmedicines,includingcertainantibiotics.
• Watersecurityandresources(SDGs3and6)–Soilsplayamajorroleinthestoringandtransmittingwatertoplants,theatmosphere,groundwater,lakesandrivers.Around74percentoffreshwaterappropriatedbyhumansisestimatedtocomefromsoil.
• Climatechange(SDG13)–Sustainablesoilmanagementcanassistwithclimatechangemitigation.
• Biodiversity(SDG15),Thereisincreasingevidencethatsoilbiodiversityisofgreatimportanceofbiogeochemicalcycles,above-groundbiodiversity,soilformation,thecontrolofplant,animal,andhumanpestsanddiseases,aswellasclimateregulation.
• Landmanagement(SDGs2,13and15)–Sustainablelandmanagementisimportanttoensureecosystemservicesandsoilfunctions.
Toachievesustainabledevelopment,weneedtorecognizethemultiplebenefitsthatsustainablesoilmanagementcouldprovidefortherealizationofthe2030agenda.
32
GlobalSymposiumonSoilPollution
Finally,earlierthisyear,theUnitedNationsEnvironmentAssembly–3(UNEA-3)committedtoapollution-freeplanet,withresolutionsthatpromisetoimprovethestatusofourplanetbycleaningupourair,waterandland.Oneoftheadoptedresolutionsfocusesontheimportanceofmanagingsoilpollution,amajorsteptowardssustainabledevelopment.Inresponsetothis,FAO,GSP,ITPS,UNEP,WHOandtheBaselandRotterdamConventionsareorganizingtheGlobalSymposiumonSoilPollutioninMay2018inordertoprovideaforumforscientificevidence,onanissuethatrequiresjointboldactions.
Box6:Informationanddata
GlobalSoilInformationSystem,includingtheInternationalNetworkofSoilInformationInstitutions
In2017,GSPpartnersrecognizingtheneedforcomprehensiveandreliablesoildatatosupportevidence-basedpolicies,agreedontheestablishmentofGlobalSoilInformationSystem(GLOSIS),includingtheInternationalNetworkofSoilInformationInstitutions(INSII).
GLOSISwillhavethreeprimaryfunctions:(i)toprovidedataonsoilsatthegloballevel(e.g.theamountofarablelandwithsuitablesoiltofeedtheworld);(ii)toprovidetheglobalcontextformorelocaldecisions(e.g.transnationalaspectsoffoodsecurityanddegradationofnaturalresources);and,(iii)tosupplyfundamentalsoildataforunderstandingEarth-systemprocessestosupportworkonmajornaturalresourceissuesfacingtheworld(e.g.climatechange,foodsecurity,biodiversityloss).
TheGlobalSoilOrganicCarbonMap
TheGlobalSoilOrganicCarbonMap(GSOCmap)waslaunchedbytheGSPin2017insupportoftheSustainableDevelopmentGoalIndicator15.3.1toassesscarbonstocksaboveandbelowground.GSOCmapaimsatprovidingapreciseandreliableglobalviewonsoilorganiccarbon(SOC)thatisneededunderdifferentUNconventions,suchastheUNConventiononClimateChangeandDesertification(UNCCD),butespeciallyaspartoftheSustainableDevelopmentGoals(SDG).
Atnationallevel,suchdatacanbeusedasareferenceforsoilcarbonstocks,withtheaimtorefinenationalgreenhousegasinventoriesandtoassessthesensitivityofsoilstodegradationandclimatechange.TheGSOCmapprovidesuserswithusefulinformationtomonitorthesoilcondition,identifydegradedareas,setrestorationtargets,exploreSOCsequestrationpotentials,supportthegreenhousegasemissionsreportingundertheUNFCCC,andmakeevidence-baseddecisionstomitigateandadapttoachangingclimate.
Internationalagreementsonsoilandlandresourcesarehelpfulbuttheyarealltonoavail,unlesstherearecomplementarypoliciesandcoordinatedactivitiesatregional,national,districtandlocallevels.Appropriateandeffectivepoliciesneedtoreflectthelocalcontextintermsofthenaturalresourceissues,culturallyacceptabilityandeconomicfeasibility.Sources:ProgressesontheGlobalSoilInformationSystem.http://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/resources/highlights/detail/en/c/1026182/;TheGSOCmap,asteppingstoneinourknowledgeofsoils.http://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/pillars-action/4-information-and-data/global-soil-organic-carbon-gsoc-map/en/
33
3.6. Wayforward Soilsconstitutearesourcethatifsustainablymanaged–bypromotingcarbonsequestration,
enhancingsoilbiodiversityandthussoilhealthandincreasedsoilfertility-couldcontributetosustainableproductivitygrowth,climatechangeadaptationandmitigation,foodsecurityandnutrition,povertyalleviation,andsustainabledevelopment.
MaintainingandincreasingSOCstocksisnotonlycrucialforreducingGHGemissionsandremovingCO2fromtheatmospherebutalsoforharnessingthebenefitsofincreasedSOCforsoilhealthandfertility,throughimprovingwaterstorageandtherebyincreasingtheaccessofplantstowaterandresiliencetodrought.MaintainingandincreasingSOCstocksshouldbepromoted,therefore,underthewiderumbrellaofsustainablesoilmanagement(SSM).
Notingthatsoilsarecurrentlyconsideredinthedevelopmentagenda,itisfundamentalto
developandstrengthensynergiesbetweentheongoinginitiativesinordertofosterpositiveimpactandmakeproperuseofthelimitedresourcesavailable.Whilethisdocumenthighlightsmanyoftheeffortscurrentlybeingmade,italsofocusesonmanyissuesthatrequirefurthersupportinordertoachievehealthysoilsforahealthylife.
3.7. Recommendations1.Inrelationtointernationalinitiatives,G20members:1.1ContinuetosupporttheGlobalSoilPartnershipandtheIntergovernmentalTechnicalPanelonSoils,andundertakeactionstopromotethePrinciplesandGuidelinesoftherevisedWorldSoilCharterandtheVoluntaryGuidelinesforSustainableSoilManagement.
1.2Supporttheeffortstoestablishglobalinformationsystems,suchastheGlobalSoilInformationSystem,theInternationalNetworkofSoilInformationInstitutions,andtheGlobalSoilOrganicCarbonMap.
1.3SupporttheimplementationoftheKoroniviajointworkonagriculture,decidedatthe23rdConferenceoftheParties(COP23)totheUnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChange(UNFCCC),anditsspecialfocusonsoilorganiccarbon,soilhealthandsoilfertility.591.4Takenoteofthe2017UnitedNationsEnvironmentAssemblyMinisterialDeclaration60onmitigatingandmanagingsoilpollution,andtheorganizationoftheGlobalSymposiumonSoilPollution.
2.Atthenationallevel,G20members:2.1Promotesustainablefarmandsoilmanagementpracticesthataretailoredtospecificsoiltypesandtocountryneeds,andaddresssoildegradationbypreventionandrestoration/rehabilitationofdegradedsoils,throughpoliciesandmeasuresthatareinlinewiththeWTOAgreements.
59https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/bonn_nov_2017/application/pdf/cp23_auv_agri.pdf60http://web.unep.org/environmentassembly/documents/political-declaration-pollution
34
2.2PromotesustainablesoilmanagementbyfacilitatingthedevelopmentofsynergieswiththeVoluntaryGuidelinesontheResponsibleGovernanceofTenureofLand,ForestsandFisheriesintheContextofNationalFoodSecurity(VGGT)adoptedbytheCommitteeonWorldFoodSecurityinMay2012.
2.3Integrateknowledgeofsoilresourcesintoformaleducation,promotemultilevelandinterdisciplinarytraining,andstrengthenresearch,developmentandextensionprograms.
2.4Developnationalsoilinformationsystemsandinstitutions,includingformonitoringsoilhealth,inconsistencywithglobalinformationsystems.
2.5EmbraceICTanddigitaldatainnovations:toimprovethesustainablesoilmanagement,andpromotetheirusetomonitorthestateofsoilsandimprovethequalityofresearch;todesignbetteragri-environmentalpoliciesandregulations;and,toprovidetargetedtechnicaladviceonfarmpracticesbyextensionservices.2.6Considertheroleofsoilmanagementpracticesintheadaptationtoandmitigationofclimatechangeandinmaintainingbiodiversity,asrecommendedbytheGlobalSymposiumonSoilOrganicCarbonanditsOutcomeDocument‘UnlockingthePotentialofSoilOrganicCarbon’.61
2.7Considerwaystostructurefinancialvehiclesandarrangementsthatwouldsupporttheinvestmentsneededtorestoresoilsandensuretheirhealthandsustainability,throughimprovingprojectpreparation,addressingdatagapsonfinancialperformance,improvinginstrumentsdesignedtofundinfrastructureprojects,andpromotingcoherence.62
61http://www.fao.org/3/b-i7268e.pdf62IFPRIBlog(Diaz-Bonilla,E.).Financingasustainablefoodfuture.HowArgentina'sG-20Presidencycantargetakeypriority.February16,2018.IFPRI.https://www.ifpri.org/blog/financing-sustainable-food-future
This report, prepared by FAO and the OECD with inputs from
IFPRI, IFAD, the World Bank and WTO, has been submitted
to the G20 Presidency of the Argentine Republic in response
to the Presidency’s request for information on future trends and
challenges faced by global agriculture, with a special focus on
the role of soils in promoting food security and the measures that
could be undertaken to facilitate sustainable soil management.
CA
0917
EN/1
/09.
18