Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XNOV 1 3 2013IN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
;
MY5 S U : " !'
X
GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTA COLONNA, Index No.: 102153/2003
Plaintiffs,NO-OPPOSHTON ONof 9os <!:c>SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
.1-V.-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,
t
Defendants.
x
WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing
the complaint against J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, with prejudice and after notice to
all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is••
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims - against defendant J.H. FRANCE
REFRACTORIES COMPANY, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkAJdjeM^-cr s 2018
A
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for PlaintiffsGiovanni Colonna, et al(212) 558-5500
Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantJ.H. France Refractories Company(212) 791-0285
hSO ORDERED, DATED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
ftHM-
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ s.c NOV 27 2018
{00098348.}COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK '! |r; LD "1 ! [Lni rx
NYCALPart 13(Mendez, J.)
NOV 1 3 2018IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
PART ITNYS SUPREME COURT - CiVIL
XIndex No. 190136/2011FRANCIS G. FEE, SR. and MARY FEE, his wife,
Plaintiffs,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et al„
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, Defendant Henkel Corporation, f/k/a Henkel Loctite Corporation, as successor to
Permatex Company, Inc. requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Henkel Corporation, f/k/a Henkel
Loctite Corporation as successor to Permatex Company, Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against Defendant Henkel Corporation, f/k/a Henkel
Loctite Corporation as successor to Permatex Company, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New&
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorneys for Plaintiffs *Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038P: (212) 267-3091
een Marron Trabold, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant Henkel Corporation, f/k/aHenkel Loctite Corporation as successor toPermatex Company, Inc.Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP77 Water Street, Suite 2100, NY, NY 10005P: (212) 232-130
K
F I L ENOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ S C
4843-2780-6585.1
j I P 1 ''
' / /! Li : : ’SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK. . . j 1 ;
NOV 1 4 2018NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
1 J
j r;vs Ii i f;
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190284/2011
DIANNE CUMMINGS, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of PETERCUMMINGS, and DIANNE CUMMINGS,Individually
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WFIEREFORE, defendant Crosby Valve, LLC (identified in the complaint as FMC
CORP., on behalf of its former subsidiary Crosby Valve Inc.) (“ Crosby” ) requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Crosby with prejudice, and after notice to all
co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Crosby are dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York/0 , of , 2018
Kate Chetta, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Crosby Valve, LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003
F I L E DSO ORDERED, NOV 2 7 }oi8
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENfcW YORK
Hon. Manuel Mendez, J. S. C.MANUELJ.MENDEZ
J.S.c3574356
j ’ L /
NOV 13 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r 3
NYS S(J r • COURT - C!VILNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XJOSEPH FOSTER and VICTORIA FOSTER,
Index No. 190411/11Plaintiff(s),
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint and
cross-claims against defendant PFIZER INC.with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant PFIZER INC. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: ?/^//y//tu
Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantPfizer Inc.
T .ipHsav TYiiionn FigWEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
F I L E D MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.CNOV 2 7 $018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
i D> !rni ;
.L.
' ! (
V Li
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NOV 1 4 2018NYS su,r>. - -;
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 115075/1998
RALPH N. BORELLI and ANNE BORELLIUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Crosby Valve, LLC (“ Crosby” ) requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Crosby with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Crosby are dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
New York, New Yorkl O ( Q> ( , 2018
Dated:
7
Kafe Chetta, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Crosby Valve, LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
o?thgfQift, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003
F S L E CSO ORDERED,
NOV 2 7 2018Hon. Manuel Mendez, J. S. C.
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
3577029
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)Index No: 190116/2011
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
HELEN T. GORMAN, INDIVIDUALLY ANDAS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THEHEIRS AND ESTATE OF THOMAS P.GORMAN, ;! if ' \rr •
Plaintiff,vs. NOV 13 2018A.O. SMITH CORP., ET AL.,
Defendants. PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
WHEREFORE, defendant Grinnell LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffscomplaint against Grinnell LLC, and its affiliate companies, with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross-claims against Grinnell LLC, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York//CA/Ptf^pc | , 2018
rDavid Chandler, Esq.Erik P. Karst, Esq.Douglas von Oiste, Esq.Karst & von Oiste, LLP576 5th Avenue, Suite 706New York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 764-3900
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
E DFNOV 27
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel .1. Mendez IIAID - xynoD aw3^dns SAN
n idvd
MANUEL J. MENDEZj.s r 8102 81 AON
a )3iVV.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 111932/2003
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WILLIAM R VESELY AND DIANEVESELY,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.O. SMITH CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
IV<• I , 2018
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
j l E • :truESO ORDERED, E!Hon. Manuel J. MendezNOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZ
j.s.rNOV 27 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
INYS SUPR
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 103796/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH WOJCIECH, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,
vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
m< ( , 2018
bene L' ny,—Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
SO ORDERED, .•j ; 1Lru Li: h .Hon. Manuel J. MendezF I L E D - j
NOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.CNOV 2 7 2018 r '.rr 13
NYS SUPRE. -lr COURT - CIVIL
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102460/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
WILBUR WRIGHT, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,
vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to YorkCorporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
\ y , 2018
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
r; nF
•-. -u
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez NOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.cNOV 27 2018 NYS suw:
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 103584/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
EDWARD WILSHUSEN,
Plaintiff,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York(\<N‘ IV , 2018
(khcrj.f — 6 ^
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
r; ! VTlCjO)L \J iL-r lL-V
NOV 1 3 2013F! Ill lii V ?
Hon. Manuel J. MendezNOV 2 7 2018 MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.CP.*\TT 13
NYS SUPRl-r COURT - CIVILCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)Index No: 190116/2011
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:HELEN T. GORMAN, INDIVIDUALLY ANDAS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THEHEIRS AND ESTATE OF THOMAS P.GORMAN,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
A.O. SMITH CORP., ET AL.,Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as Goulds Pumps LLC, herebyrequests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as GouldsPumps LLC, and its affiliate companies, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, itis
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross-claims against Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as Goulds Pumps LLC, and itsaffiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
A/ 0 tfg <* f )gr , 2018
MtAMMBeth L. Hughes, Esq:Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
David Chandler, Esq.Erik P. Karst, Esq.Douglas von Oiste, Esq.Karst & von Oiste, LLP576 5th Avenue, Suite 706New York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 764-3900
ID) in(TOIL i I.SO ORDERED, i! \y E i LHon. Manuel J. MendezF I L E D NOV 13 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK*OFFICENEW YORK
f •*T‘ « i*.y
1 \t' } i!ru ^
;:: ig^ED• i\ ‘».y
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
13— X \ :NYS ;rr - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)— X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116200/2002
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
FRANK BESIGNANO,
_— Xttmum WIWMwt wmnf ww <
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkmmaTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLQs/h/a Rockbestos Inc.
&2
By: By:Andrew J. Mundo
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
rF S L E LSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C
NOV 2 7 3018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
[TU V
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
l . ' .Vl’ 13NYS SIJPRul- i i COURT - CIVIL
- Xfwmwww wwiw— ii mi
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116197/2002
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
LIONEL L. BAIN,
Xm****** ««•»i
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
hm/1
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
5*
By:By:Andrew J. Mundo
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
F I L E DSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C.
NOV 2 7 ‘2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
'V
ID)i . -• /; !
U li ;i
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
P.:\ Xr 13NYS SUY:3. . 3 COUKT - CIVILX
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
Index No.: 116209/2002This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
RONALD AMBROSIO,
X> — i — m mm tmm mm*
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & Cable
LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable
LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkitlWA
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
y
By:By:Andrew J. Mundo
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
4P iSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C
m 11K'S OFF'c£
COUN^YORK
U Li
NOV 1 3 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- X - CI' / IL* (Mi
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
XMM MW «» MW INK*» MM MM MM4*i .40
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116202/2002
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ROBERT J. APERAWIC,
0MHM1— — IIMMMMM—WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable
LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yotrk, New York7/3/ / o
* 9
IITHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire &pCable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc
By: _By:Andrew J. Mundo
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
F I L E $SO ORDERED:
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.NOV 27 tOW
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — X> «•«>»«»*»•»«»«*« >«*«*
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
-X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116195/2002
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
VINCENT BONVINO,
Xmw-—WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
1/3 / / iLiTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.
By: By: — a
Andrew J. Mundo
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F S L E/~\ uSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZNOV 2 7 3018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKj.r
‘7 -v
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X»*»«**•» 4
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
- XMWMM.HWM'nntMKliMMMOW m «MMMW « »«>" **»«"<mmim-mmummum - > mrniMMnm*»4iinmmtmm*
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116208/2002
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
CARMINE ALICATA,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yorki New York
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a RockbestosJm. ^
By: By:Andrew J. Mundo
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
F I L E CSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ .S.C,
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEMEW YORK
!O; i r'-3
Lrii a-1. . r '1
i. ..
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2013
X [ • \ -«M»«M iWMWW^fMWNM
NYS si ;; >IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
Index No.: 1$6827/2000This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
EUGENE CHEVALIER
— X< mmmmmumwtmmm*«mummmm>m*tmmmm m9* «••» 1
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire& Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, Mew York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:By:Dan Gagliardi
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0555
F i L E CNOV 27 3018
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ * r
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
"71 7 r, - - i ;"?•W ! L ! I.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2013
- x p •' ~ y i 3NYS suf'R T - r v , T LIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)— X
Index No.: lJ)6827/2000This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
EUGENE CHEVALIER
— X«*«**»<•»tm•»«*«»«»4*1
WHEREFORE,defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
the complaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear CanadaInc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:By:Dan Gagliardi
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0555
F 8 L E 4 ,to-SO ORDERED:
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C. NOV 2 7 *018MANUEL J.MENDEZ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK» ^ r
’ \ 'l
Li 'Ll Liz 0 •
NOV 1 3 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — X
NYS SUPI- 0 . • . ‘VO'JMT - C I V I LIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116196/2002
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
EMANUEL G. BELLUARDO,
— X
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Ybrk, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
i
By:By:Andrew J. MundoJonn Dearn
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
F I L E i'aca,1
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C. NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE•N'EVV YORK
MANUEL MENDEZJ.S.C
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK 2018
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS NYCALLITIGATION
xSONIA G. DALTON as Executrix for the Estate of Index No.: 110362-08EUGENE S. DALTON,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDERPlaintiff,
- against -A.L. Eastmond & Sons, Inc., et al.,
Defendants. — x
WHEREFORE, defendant Easco Boiler Corp., individually, and as successor to A.L.Eastmond & Sons, Inc., incorrectly named in the Amended Verified Complaint as “ ALEastmond & Sons Inc. individually and as successor to Federal Boilers” and “ Easco Boiler Corp.individually and as successor to Federal Boilers” in this action (“ Easco” ), requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Easco with prejudice, and after notice to all«
co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Easco are dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
Mayj£_, 2018
DAY PITNEY LLPWEITZ & LUXENBERi
By:By:jBenjamm E. Haglund, Esq. (yAttorneys for defendant Easco Boiler Corp.,individually, and as successor to A.LEastmond & Sons, Inc.7 Times Square, 20 FLNew York, New York 10036Tel: (212) 297-5800
Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.Attorneys for plaintiffSonia G. Dalton as Executrix for the Estateof EugeneS. Dalton700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Tel: (212) 558-5500 nD 5 «©
LU gG> CSJ
UJ|CJ oLU £
a© n
F 6 L E §5f DSO ORDERED
Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.StE U J£ £O UJ
NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C
99713977 !
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
N
si
.•# *V
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xMICHAEL YANIS, as Administrator for the Estate ofWALTER P. YANIS,
Index No.: 102373/1999
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-v.-
A.C. and S., et al.,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing
the complaint against J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, with prejudice and after notice to
all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant J.H. FRANCE
REFRACTORIES COMPANY, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkNovi 1
AdamWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for PlaintiffsWalter P. Yanis, et al.(212) 558-5500
Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantJ.H . France Refractories Company(212) 791-0285
ii [ i3liF S j, £NOV 2 7 m
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENHV YORK
SO ORDERED, ••,:ADATED: n
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C. bus*,"
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ S C
{00098344.}
MOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPFr- - ’£ C.OoCT ' CU1LXNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE:
X
Index No.: 108106/2000This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
CHRISTINE M. VAN GARDEREN, as Executrix for theEstate of RONALD T. RICHTMEYER,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc., requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc., are
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
foj'zstoLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By: By:Daniel J. Gagliardi, Esq.er, Esq.
* 137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED:
F I L E £Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J.MENDEZ
MOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
fpjrrq’ . p'. nini n. irSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2018XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 122054/1999
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
EDWARD J. DONOVAN
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc., requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc., aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New.York
i5mWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
By:By:Brett Fuller, Esq. Eric M. Zisk, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED: F 3 L E CHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J.MENDEZ
J.S.C. NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
~ ~3 "A n Fr;i;
•") i.
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ! ' \T 1 j
N Y S S U P K: - av!LNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XNELSON A. STRAUCH, JR. and PATRICIA STRAUCH,
Plaintiff(s),Index No. 105671/99
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
LZJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
F 0 L E C SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
NOV 2 7 2018 MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
!ITU lb
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2018
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
X p/viT i 3NYS SLf'LS'-'.i COURT • CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XRALPH N. BORELLI and ANNE BORELLI,
Index No. 108709/01; 115075/98Plaintiff(s),
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 0(jt<J>(T ^ / <P° //
fu.Patrick Finlay, Esq. f )WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
F B L E D SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S.C.COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
; i \ \ n. \J I..*1:7.1Lr
_i! ... i
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r. 'ivr 13
NYS SUPPSMc COURT - CIVILX NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
NELSON A. STRAUCH, JR. and PATRICIA STRAUCH,Index No. 105671/99
Plaintiffs),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al. i
Defendants.X !
:;
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,i
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL!
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated:
f
i/4^Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
1
Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs) i
SO ORDERED, F f l L E ^ ']Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C:MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J S C NOV 2 7 £018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
«
• n0=3 r=H £-2 l-.// 22
NOV 1 3 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XEDWARD BENDERSKI,
Index No. 121394/00; 106277/99Plaintiff(s),
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.fim 2oUDated:
//
/Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
NON 1 ^SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
c°on^MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C
: V'. [F- V
NOV 1 3 ,2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK T 13
: COURT - aNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XRICHARD A. HIDDIE and SHIRLEY HIDDIE,
Index No. 119850/98Plaintiff(s),
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:/
( /LJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
F I L E DHon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
NOV 2 7 2018SO ORDERED,
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
NOV 1 S 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK -rr 13N Y SNYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
X • A * X'LiRT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XLAVINA R. SYLVIA, as Administratrix for the Estate ofCHARLES F. SYLVIA, and LAVINA R. SYLVIA,Individually,
Index No. 113092/98; 111046/98
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Plaintiffs),
-against-A.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY)., et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.\Dated: /-
/
MhJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Justin siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
F B L E DasSO ORDERED, NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.CMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
S'; fr-J
lE l!II ' n''
*• i .:\‘J ! :
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 S 2ojS
X NYCAL „I.A.S. Part ULJ^ SUPP^CO^T(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
WILSON A. TERRILLION and JOYCE TERRILLION,Index No. 190271/09
Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
M 2%7- py^Dated: //I
MhJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Justin Sieoel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
F i L E cSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
7-“.:n •-
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
NYSIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION j
XJAMES L. WATSON and IRENE WATSON,
Index No. 112602/00; 122200/99Plaintiffs),
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S. INC., (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:/
J4M.Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Justir/Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
1mm/
SO ORDERED, NOV 2 7 2018Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
MANUEL J. MENDEZ COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORKJ.S.C.
.~ZJ ./ ' nTE3 ' --"* • I
i _ L--| I.1;;-SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2018NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
XPART 13IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX
FRANCIS GOES and SENTA GOES,Index No. 100904/03; 105028/03;
190413/11Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: / H /!*¥/
^7 /
Joanuasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Ufendsay-Beeieee pc/]WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffts)
; C;jfFF I L s» jM \II
ILSO ORDERED,
NOV 2 7 2018Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.CMANUEL J. MENDE2
J .S r COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
ojrFj.fIN EL V::j
! U-I. . I
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
p/'.Fv; nNYS S U P ';. ' Y "OUKT - '"UVIl•X
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
XThis Document Relates To:
DOMINICK CIPRIANI, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,
-against- IndexNo.: 112064/1999
ACandS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION(“ CENTRAL HUDSON” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against
defendant CENTRAL HUDSON, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant, CENTRAL HUDSON, be and the same hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
njs/ itNew YorkDated:New York,
A
RGthe A. Nepf^Esq.THOMPSON HINE LLPAttorneys for Defendant335 Madison Avenue, 12th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 344-5680
Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
F 3 L E L,r ~
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez
NOV 27 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
4814-6383-1413.1
\y jib !ln
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2018IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 13(Hon.Manuel J. Mendez)
NYS SUPKui'-'c coo:- - CIVIL. \ '
This Document Relates To:!
Index No : 117992/02ROBERT G. IZYK
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,! dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS
COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant A.O. SMITH WATER
PRODUCTS COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without cost.Dated: White Plains, New York
IL/lf , 2018
AAdam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs)WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York NY 10003
, Esq.LauraTJ. Ho|Attorney fj/FDefendantA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909
& jF l LSO ORDERED,Ik*.Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
f
{V0544722.1}
Nl / ' ' / 8SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NYSSijP,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XJOSEPH F. KLEIN and DOROTHY KLEIN,
Index No. 111232/01; 119776/01Plaintiff(s),
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 9/ll/l?/
:
Joanlj^iotvEsq!RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
psd. —WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
m UrvniHon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
SO ORDERED,NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
[u L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NOV 1 3 2018PV\T 13
' P Z Z H E COURT - CIV?X NYCAL i ,,/q c
I.A.S. Part T3(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
DANIEL CURCI and ROSE CURCI,
Plaintiff(s),Index No. 190294/10
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:97/7//P //
//
Joan'Cjasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
icco.Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBEF700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
F i L PT"Kj A
LU iL^SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J- COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
; - f ,...I—
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r s i
M Y S S U P? 2 . C G Y Y T • CIVILNYCAL LI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XLINDA MOSSOW as Administratrix for the Estate ofLYLE V. MOSSOW, Index No. 112280/02; 105718/02
Plaintiff(s), UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER-against-
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:_2'//7/7£ //
/
5WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
Joanuasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation r ~
>3
m hr
NOV 2 7 2018SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.&C.
U'
Ll LLSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2018
NYCAL ,I.A.S. Part 13 NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL(Mendez, J.)
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XVINCENT BOYLE and ELLEN BOYLE,
Index No. 111219/01; 116426/01Plaintiff(s),
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: ^//1// % //
./i J
Joan uasior, EsqRENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
WEITZ & LUXENBER700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
& iSO ORDERED, NOV 2 7 7018Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZj.S .r
I r.j
j V ,7/r3 fd v y c 'a
' • '
'ir,'1 ;c:, lSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
N0V 1 3 20 ,SX NYCAL
I.A.S. Part(Mendez, J.)
PAST 1 3COURTEMUIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION - CIVIL
XJOYCE MCILMURRAY, as Personal Representative forthe Estate of JOHN MCILMURRAY, and JOYCEMCILMURRAY, Individually,
Index No. 119380/00; 102691/01
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Plaintiff(s),
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
nu 9 23,2o\ t \Dated: /
/4
Joanuasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporatijpj|^ K.-
Jusnn Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
NOV 2 7 2018SO ORDERED,
Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
JSC
sipy !r=os ,
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F /' FIT i 3X MVS SUPREME COURT • crvnIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
XThis Document Relates To:
MICHAEL SOLOMON and GERTRUDE SOLOMON, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs,
Index No.: 102916/00-against-ACandS, INC., et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION
(“ CENTRAL HUDSON” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against
defendant CENTRAL HUDSON, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant, CENTRAL HUDSON, be and the same hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:New York, New York
Ruthe A. Nepf, Esq.THOMPSON HINE LLPAttorneys for Defendant335 Madison Avenue, 12th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 344-5680
Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
F i L E LSO ORDERED,
Hon. Manuel Mendez NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDE*
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK
4834-3998-6293 I
r5) .'fV' • \
NOV 1 3 2013rJYs SUP;; rC:. ,ST.CF,/;LSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORKX NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
SALVATORE T. CALANDRINO,Index No. 190439/10
Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.-''iDated: /
U.Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
WEITZ & LUXENBE700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
"\i L E LSSI
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J . S .C COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
AS
fin n
8102 i Z d3 Sm n 51 °n 51 iyUU Li 3J GU 3J H
! UfalibLJ cU
in : fr- .i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i ' vrr 13NYS Sl.\r;33y3XCHARLES L. GRUNERT,
Index No. 114345/02; 106692/02Plaintiff(s),
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
foyV-W\W 7\,2.( y\ ^Dated:,/'Jl 14Justin Stebel, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
F i S mK -a
NOV 2 7 2018SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
MANUEL J- MENDEZ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEJ.S.C. NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X NYCALI.A.S. Part(Mendez, J.)
NYS sur COURTIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
GEORGE E. MILLER,Index No. 100306/02; 120430/01
Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.rizilibDated: /
// Jr:LJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Brett Fuller, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
jj 1 |U \ibcM liraa bias*'SO ORDERED,
Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .* ^ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
IU
NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - O'V!Lx NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
THOMAS ANTHONY VALACHOVIC,Index No. 105715/02; 110318/02
Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY, et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: October 8, 2018
Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Brett Fuller, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
f i t K,a» iLSO ORDERED,
NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
mc.
NOV 1 3 20 (8SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ‘ ' r r i 3N Y S S U P R3NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
X CURT - CIVILM:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
WILLIAM E. JOYCE and MARIE JOYCE,Index No. 190172/09; 117843/02;
109675/99; 111069/98;113280/97; 111191/96
Plaintiff(s),
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
-UPJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Brett Fuller, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
SO ORDERED, F il L rLUHon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
MANUEL J. MENDEZ NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
THOMAS ANTHONY VALACHOVIC,Index No. 105715/02; 110318/02
Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY, et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: October 8, 2018//
lzJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Brett Fuller, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
r.pmSO ORDERED,
Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICtNEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 101869/2004
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
JAMES CLEMENTS AND BERYL E.CLEMENTS,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.O. SMITH CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor
to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant
York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate
companies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed
without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
nov . i 2- , 2018
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
: r>p 1 L hNOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SO ORDERED,fO) ftP , -r^ fpi r; lA „ .heye;( v/ f =
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez ii -AiUJMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C. NOV 1 3 2018NYS SUPREME'COURT‘CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 103542/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
CORNELIUS CUNNINGHAM ANDBRIDGET CUNNINGHAM,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
( ) &{ . , 2018
BrictrrEarly, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
F i L E LNOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
D) iF: ,IrOLuV'.L Ji ;
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
NOV 1 3 2018MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C.
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 121630/2001
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RICHARD F. CHRISTIE AND CLARICEILENE CHRISTIE,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to YorkCorporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
nrv. ' x-Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
, 2018
'Beth L. Hughes, fisq. ri-:ur ia L ABrady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
iHt»D
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
0r? n \V /7ESO ORDERED, r; vyHon. Manuel J. Mendez
NOV 1 3 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 113859/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
JEANNETTE DEBINSKI, ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OFJOHN LAWRENCE DEBINSKI ANDJEANETTE DEBINSKI, AS SPOUSE,
Plaintiff,vs.A.W. CHESTERTON CO. INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor
to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate
companies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed
without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkrv. \ b , 2018
BriarTEarly, Esq. ~ —'Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
6"; ii L 1 'Hlirvn
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
f c : "r ::‘ :
SO ORDERED, i ' i : s ..
Hon. Manuel J. MendezNOV 1 3 2018
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 117270/2000
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PHILLIP DILLON AND BRIDGETDILLON,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor
to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendantYork International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate
companies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed
without prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
fW - 12. , 2018
&PJPi — -Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian tarty, bsq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
F H L F:: . j
E£ Hi®*.-
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
[33313TOIL :SO ORDERED, \. -
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez NOV 1 3 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 118531/2000
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RUDOLPH DIMAURO AND ROSEDIMAURO,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
M , Yt , 2018-L Wit— •
FTTE 1Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
him*-
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
[Q) E/R- , rrjLro E U J f
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
NOV 1 3 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C PART 13
NYS SUPREMc COURT - C ( VJL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 124353/2000
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
SAM GARELLICK, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,
vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York International Corporation, and its affiliate
companies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, and its affiliate
companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez r
I..,) ' i 'V'
lroF 3 L E i MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C NOV 1 3 2018
NOV 2 7 2018 PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF1CNEW YORK
1-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 119670/2000
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PAUL E. GROSSMAN AND KATHERINEGROSSMAN,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York International Corporation, and its affiliatecompanies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, and its affiliate
companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York(M 0- , 2018
ME -L —BrianEarly, Esq. ^ 'Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez D i f a J :: i j //' R I Pril [LifaLfa L! \J fa;LLF I L E fa MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.s r NOV 1 3 2018NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICLMEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 111925/2003
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN J. GRECO AND MARIELLENGRECO,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.A.O. SMITH CORP., et aL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor
to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendantYork International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliatecompanies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, Individually and asSuccessor to Frick Company, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Q(PL ? 2018
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
<6Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
FlTT f LuHon. Manuel J. Mendez 1.•
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.c
NOV 1 3 2018NOV 2 7 2018PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC -NSW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102457/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN HAWKINS, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,
vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York(W< YL , 2018
Brian Early, Esq. — ^Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
0,«** ' *•y-TJ
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
F 1 L NOV 1 3 2018u *
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .C PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNOV 27 20«^OUNTY CLERKS
NEW YD**-i....OfPK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102435/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
FRED KNECHTEL AND BARBARAKNECHTEL,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
(Mi l x 2018aetp -k Am— -2L
Brian"Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
! OHLT ii
NOV 1 3 2018Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZj.c rMOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLEW*OFFICENSW ^0RK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 121876/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:MARIA GRYNYCHYN AND TODDKRICHMAR, AS CO-ADMINISTRATORSFOR THE ESTATE OF MYROSLAW MAC,AND MARIA GRYNYCHYN, AS SPOUSE,
Plaintiffs,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
vs.A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et aL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
to* I I , 2018
BriairEarly, fcsq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
91:9f(^ (19 [ j '0, nF= rr-A'9> (S!lYj ityuLSSO ORDERED,
NOV j 3 2013F B L E L Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZj.s r
P/VVT 13^ COURT - CIVILNYS SUPP.S
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 104509/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WILLIAM W. LITTLE,
Plaintiff,vs.A.W. CHESTERTON CO. INC., et ah,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor
to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate
companies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed
without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
, 2018
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
•- .' i !ryy !L^ [ L
F str* NOV 1 3 2018Hon. Manuel J. MendezL -
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILMANUEL J. MENDEZ
j.srNOV 2 7 2018
OUNTY CUERKSOFHO:MEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102461/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ARTHUR LEISENHEIMER AND JEANLEISENHEIMER,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkrw. a , 2018
BriarTEarly, Esq. y
Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000“ '“ ni ; [ j -\ /7 (V :
I
li L-:.NOV 1 3 20180|£ERp,
Hon. Manuel J. MendezPART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.CNOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC EMEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 100919/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
MARGARET LAROSA, ASADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OFFRANK J. LAROSA, AND MARGARETLAROSA, AS SPOUSE,
Plaintiff,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York International Corporation, and its affiliate
companies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, and its affiliate
companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkr W' ( x. , 2018
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Ifii LLSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
AF 1 L E MOV 1 3 2018tv. MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102453/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
JOHN LANGAN AND KATHERINELANGAN,
Plaintiffs,vs.AC&S INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
13- . 2018
iBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233 v-A vj
NOV 1 3 2018HL. Hon. Manuel J. MendezPART 13
MYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018 MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEX’ZW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 103594/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
CORNELIUS MCNULTY,
Plaintiff,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation
(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation
(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), and its affiliate companies, without prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation
(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), and its affiliate companies, be and the same
are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
^ , 2018
1'ksk Lr LBriarfEarly, Esq. — 'Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
F i Hon. Manuel J. Mendez0 2018NOV 2 7 2018 MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.c ' CIVILCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102456/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
MARTIN MCLOUGHLIN ANDFLORENCE MCLOUGHLIN,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
(W . q , 2018
MhJ-Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-60
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
i*-*Y r*y
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez 2018A* s*
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 118088/2000
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN MCCONNON, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,
vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
flOY- UL , 2018
i- —Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
ir ;: iUSO ORDERED,
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
F S NOV 13 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C PART 13
- CIVILNYS SUPREME: COURTNOV 2 7 mCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 109474/2003
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
THOMAS J. MARRON, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,
vs.A.O. SMITH CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation
(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation
(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), and its affiliate companies, with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York Industries, Inc.and York International Corporation
(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), and its affiliate companies, be and the same
are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
UKi LL , 2018'L — >
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233 r~\, !
HOY 1 3 2018t.
NOV 2 7 2018PART 13
COURT - C/7JLNYS SUP;:;
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW vORK
4
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUELJ.MENDEZj.s.c
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 111933/2003
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
COLLEEN FISCHER, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WILLIAM D. MANNIX,Plaintiff,
vs.A.O. SMITH CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation
(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation
(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), and its affiliate companies, with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation
(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), and its affiliate companies, be and the same
are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
MN- ( JL , 2018
too £Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017
P^l 86®33 DiEVFx'. r,rne4? IL Efi,• I •
J. -4'
NOV 2 7 2018 MV 1 3 2013PART 13-•' IE COURT - CIVIL
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
NVS SUPR-
\
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 103682/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
THOMAS J. O'REILLY AND ALICEO'REILLY,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
CML \±L ? 2018
i- 'VWLBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233 DirF^p. ii- ; ^ /;.v -MMM
SO ORDERED, NOV 1 3 2018Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S .CPART 13
MVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102448/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
FREDERICK OLSON AND AURORAOLSON,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
POL I ?- , 2018
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq. ^Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
O Ff •r~;
\J [i j)
NOV 1 3 2018Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
NOV 2 7 20t8 PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILCOUNTY CLERKS OFFICE
NEW VQBK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 117403/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
MARY MORAN, ADMINISTRATRIX OFTHE ESTATE OF WILLIAM MORAN,
Plaintiff,vs.A.W. CHESTERTON CO. INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor
to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate
companies, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
, 2018
i-Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
rP) rp$
•ma \ p j::-i|~.Nt i pHon. Manuel J. Mfendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
H0V 1 3 2018NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW vORK
- Cf'JIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102455/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
PRINCIPIO RIVICCIO AND JOSEPHINERIVICCIO,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation,as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
nr' I ?- , 2018i-%UA-Beth L. Hughes, Esq.
Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233 —1 r"
< I-.-, - rtry rrr i ‘ '
MOV 1 3 3013Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.CNYS SUPRS. COURTNOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 103686/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
FRANK RELLA AND LENA RELLA,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor
to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant
York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate
companies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed
without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
rw- \ h- , 2018
Brian"Eariy, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
n, • ir~ \ \r/SO ORDERED, : : 1 ; !V/ i.!.F V, Hon. Manuel J. Mendezi:j£*' 1
i*KJT4;i
iJ.'HK,.' NOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.CMOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFJC-NEV/ YORK
PACT 13NYS SUPP3A 3 COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102454/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
BARTHOLOME PIAZZA AND JULIAPIAZZA,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York{Mi 13- , 2018
Brian'Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
if-:'7 1RED I !
Hon. Manuel J. MendezNOV 1 3 2013
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C
NOV 2 7 2018 PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102434/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WILLIAM PAWLOWSKI ANDMARGARET PAWLOWSKI,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
CW' ( L" , 2018
Brian "Early, Esq. Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
17:J i
F frK Hon. Manuel J. MendezNOV 1 3 2013
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 105922/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
DONALD PACCIONE AND DIANEPACCIONE,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
fW. \ L , 2018
A 1Qc/pt—Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
,0i
f U LHon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.CNOV 13 2013NOV 2 7 2018
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102436/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
DONALD PACCIONE AND JOSEPHINEPACCIONE,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Cw. |X. , 2018
BriarfEarlyTEsq. —'Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
SO ORDERED,
F S L E C roiwW [[,;. ! v/ L IJJHon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.CNOV 1 3 2018NOV 2 7 2018
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEVE\V YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102451/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
RAYMOND OSSO AND SANDRA OSSO,Plaintiffs,
vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York(\(K ‘ [ % , 2018
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
r: L
IT 'LL,SO ORDERED,
F S L f f|
.» !J
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez KOV 1 3 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C PART 13!TS SUPR::« COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018
-OUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102452/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WILLIAM RYAN AND KATHERINERYAN,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
{ML , 2018
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
V TT .
O/lrt!RDEREDit > r»! '9
KO'J 1§&23 .,i: Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
NOV 2 7 2018 p;V.Vr 13/;cC.OUR « ‘MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
CI'i'LNYS SUPP -
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE.
XEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102458/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
FRANCIS ROSZAK,
Plaintiff,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkf\0ft 'A- , 2018
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
fO; fF3 /7 Y. f i
.uSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
NOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZJSC.
.-rte.'Jt
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEvc'C YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102449/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
IRVING SCHWARTZ AND MARILYNSCHWARTZ,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.P, GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkyw . \ ^ , 2018
(kKO L ladr—Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233 r”
'-3 ! . ' h I "”
J ..ii u : - A - / L"
:_ . » 1-.«.
SO ORDERED,NOV 1 3 2013Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
F 1 L MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
MOV 27 2018
,-OUNTY CLERKS OFFICE-N \ • V.QPK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102438/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
GEORGE SMOLICZ,
Plaintiff,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York_ PttTV. \Tr , 2018
(k& — -Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Til lirj V,;-:/ IT ” jj v / iiJ,SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez NOV 1 3 2013F 1 L E l1 MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.CPART 13
NYS S U P R i C O U R T - CIVIL
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW vORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102459/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
GERALD SORGENTE,Plaintiff,
vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
rw- u- , 2018
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
SO ORDERED, If L U LF I L E Hon. Manuel J. Mendez j
NOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.CNOV 2 7 2018 PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICECEVY YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102450/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
MATT SULLIVAN,
Plaintiff,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York
Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York
International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest
to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York(\Qf; I 1- , 2018
Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
SO ORDERED, NOV 1 3 2013fC1 Hon. Manuel J. MendezF I L E ! MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
p.vrr 13NYS SlJf'P - COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEX’EW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 102153/2003
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTACOLONNA, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,
vs.A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Grinnell LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Grinnell LLC without prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto.
ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Grinnell LLC be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
LO+Sh ' 2018
fkjfc LCharles Ferguson, EsqNOJames Thompson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
I \
f * — -*LTU 1L iJ
NOV 1 3 2013F peer-Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
rvvr 13;COURT - CIVILMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S .CNYS SUPU-/
NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE!\,r-\ V YORK.
HM WWSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IT:
X NOV 2 0 2018NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYABESTOS LITIGATION
NYS SUPREME G..,.vU
XThis document Relates to:VITO TERIC and AVELINA TERIC, Index No.: 105462/99
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGEMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Plaintiff(s),
- against -
A.C. & S. INC., et al.;Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. request summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross claims against FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendants FULTON BOILER
WORKS, INC. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: New York, New York— ft? k 2018
.albardier, Esq.For Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.
Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
Suzann<Attome
Erik Jacobs, Esq, jAttorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg P.C700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
F f L E DSO ORDERED,W 2 7 2O(8
COUNTY CLEF), .NEW YORK
Hon. Manuel MendezMANUEL J.MENDEZ
J.S.C. R'S OFFICE
j)
NOV 2 0 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
x NYS SO! COURT - CIVILIN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xVITO TERIC and AVELINA TERIC, Index No.: 105462/1999
Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-v.-
A.C. and S., INC., et al.,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissingthe complaint against J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, with prejudice, and after notice to
all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIESCOMPANY, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York2018
1 L E DNOV 2 7 2018
Erik Jacobs, Esq. y Ev^S. Wayne, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, HQOUNTY CLERK'S’ OpfiifcCLABY& BRADLEY, LLC
!Vr-W YORK 150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantJ.H. France Refractories Company(212) 791-0285
DATED: jl
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for PlaintiffVito Teric, et al.(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .s c
{00097977.}
in ;
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 2 0 2018
X
NYS Si.,1!':"IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
X
DENNIS LUCENTI, as Executor for the Estate ofJOSEPH D. LUCENTI,
Index No.: 104390/2005
Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-v.-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing
the complaint against J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, with prejudice and after notice to
all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant J.H. FRANCE
REFRACTORIES COMPANY, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York/// Z-0 2018
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for PlaintiffsJoseph Lucenti, et al.(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantJ.H. France Refractories Company(212) 791-0285 ,DATED:
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZ NOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
{00098343.}
p) ftLTL lc: ! iJ1 1.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
NOV 2 0 2018X
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION r -I NYS SU; •' l l.
X
This Document Relates To: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERVITO TERIC,
Plaintiff, Index No. 105462/99
-against-
A.C. & S„INC., et al.,
Defendantsx
WHEREFORE defendant, Morse Diesel, Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-
claims against Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no
opposition, it is
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkU ( g , 2018
CLYDE & CO US LLPWEITZ & ERGtfrC."
4—By:By: Kevin W. Turbert, Esq.The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.
Erik Jacobs, Esq. (700 Broadway,New York, New York 10003Tel: (212) 558-5500
Attorney for Plaintiff F I L E DNOV 2 7 2018SO-ORDERED:
HON. MANUEL MENDEZ, J.S.C.
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ .S.C
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENrW vOn^
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
f w V 2 1 mIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 105935/03, 128019/02
DAVID POCHILY UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice, and after notice
to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corp., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Y|ork, L(ep/ York, 2018U
1 'fv’TAjC / /_Attorney for Plaintiff(s)David PochilyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
K
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
JMANUEL J. MENDEZNOV 2 7 2018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEMHV\I VORK
2383-26078AG
" "—SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK FT/ o 1 ?* v r & A. /20:3IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 105935/03, 128019/02
DAVID POCHILY UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint
and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation,
are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New (York, jNew York, 2018urns
Attorney aiiTtiff/sfDavid PochilyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
R
SO ORDERED, P U L E DHon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C NOV 2 7 2013 1235-21185
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YO i\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
!r- r r.rc)
V & i JIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
!i.
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 105935/03, 128019/02
DAVID POCHILY UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint
and cross-claims against Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.,
are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York<11 I I , 2018
ttfiney fefpiaindfftjs)^ ( ^ . Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
K< aiADavid PochilyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
F B L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 1122-21683
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
NOV 2 1 ’i 20:3This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 111231/01,STEPHEN JOHN MCFADDEN
ANDDOLORES MCFADDEN
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint
and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-
defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation,
are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York( \ \ Qib\ , 2018
3. Cook, Esq.
Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
KAttorney fo!*Plaintiff(s)Stephen John McFadden and DoloresMcFaddenWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C
NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YOP
1235-417AG
\SU\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK > < * I 20;3IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONiNYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 111231/01,
STEPHEN JOHN MCFADDENAND
DOLORES MCFADDENUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courier & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint
and cross-claims against Courier & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-
defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courier & Company, Inc.,
are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Newv i prK, i\iew Yorrc
\ V , 2018
Ke^yamiMf Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourier & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Stephen John McFadden and DoloresMcFaddenWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J.MENDEZJSC tI22-r99AGF f l L E D
NOV H aptaCOUNTY OffICE
NEW YOU*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NJV 2 1 20 ; 3IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 117331/01, 117339/01
VINCENT VITALE AND CATHERINE VITALE
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
H \ , 2018
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsVincent Vitale and Catherine VitaleWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
S5ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S.C F I L E D2383-24068V
NOV 2 7 ty)t8COUNTY OfRKt OFFICE
NEW YORK
{N0799638-1}
/
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK p y r.p.r
Li — L v i; 3IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 108362/01, 108334/01
CARMELA VINCELLO, INDIVIDUALLY ANDAS THE EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
GERALD VINCELLO UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New (fork, fyew York
, 2018
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Gerald VincelloWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C. 2383-23694
F I L E D{N0799638-1} NOV 27 Mtt
COUNTY Plot
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r o1\ * & i 20 =3IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 116800/01, 116831/01
MIRAND SUPRINA, INDIVIDUALLY ANDEXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF MARIO
SUPERINA UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New jew YorkI , 2 0 1 8l\
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsMario SuperinaWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
2383-23917S
F S L E D{N0799638-1}
NOV 27|0t8COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
• r 0 ? <- r. Q' » 0i:t \i t- v
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 117331/01, 117340/01
GENEVA SANDERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF
CHARLES SANDERS UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, Nfew York__\iij2y _, 2018
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Charles SandersWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. F I L E D 2383-24068U
NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERICS OFFICENEW YORK
{N0799638-1}
* \
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONiNYCALi I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)
IK:VI r *
& ji C- o * JiThis Document Relates to:
j r ; .\Index No.: 109983/08JOSEPH SAEVA
ANDNORMA SAEVA UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls
USA Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Atwood & Morrill
Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co.,
Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New YorkINew York\ \ \ ^M , 2018
n
Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq. ~ '
Attorney for DefendantAtwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A WeirValves & Controls USA Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for£fcJaintiff(s)Joseph Saeva and Norma SaevaBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
mvnmMANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C.
963-95
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK !
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION 13V . A L.
o r.<N.
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 103903/08
AUDREY RUDA AS ADMINISTRATRIX !OF THE ESTATE OF JACK RUDA i UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
! JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls
USA Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Atwood & Morrill
Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co.,
Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Ybrk, New York\ \ 2018
//
%Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for Defendant
Iqrinistratrix of the Estate of Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A WeirValves & Controls USA Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for PljaintAudrey RudaJack RudaBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
)
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez F I L E DMANUEL J.MENDEZ
J.S.C 963-85i. '
NOV 27 9018COUNTY CLERK*OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
7f? ;v i
;si -i c;
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
L
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 108421/01, 118430/01
GARY REGELSKY
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, Njew York
, 2018U-U
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsGary RegleskyWELENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C F I L E D 2383-236951
NOV 27 )01t{N0799638-1}
COUNTY CLERICS OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
2013l ; -/ ^ U
\NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.) L.
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 116800/01, 116835/01
MILDRED REED, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF
GEORGE REED UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
\ Q- . 2018
UKevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of George ReedWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. F i L E D 2383-239170
NOV 27 2018COUNTY CLEFltCS OFFICE
NEW YOfiK
{N0799638-1}
' \
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
/ 2 i 2013r ‘
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 117331/01, 117344/01
MARIE PARVIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF
JOSEPH W. PARVIS UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
:w York_, 2018Dated: New " rork,
U..L2
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Joseph W. ParvisWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
2383-24068
F i L say
l£m LJ{N0799638-1}
NOV 2 7 to18COUNTY
NEW YORK
'
iir'\i f? i’ i Q- v ^ JL ilcj i 0»SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK i
jIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
f • ••
!- . ..
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 108366/01, 108334/01
LOUIS V. PAPALEO AND MARY PAPALEO
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New|Yorkj New York
, 2018ILL2=
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsLouis V. Papaleo and Mary PapaleoWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZj.S r F I L E D 2383-23694G
\ .
NOV 2 7 m<{N0799638-1}
COUNTY CLERICS OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK f- V £ 1 20 iSIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 119564/01, 119904/01
MICHAEL OKLEVITCH, JR., AS THEADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF
MICHAEL OKEVITCH, SR. UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NewlYork, New York\ \ |7 , 2018
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Michael, Sr.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c. 383-24274
F i L E dNOV 27 1018{N0799638-1}
COUNTY CLERICS OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
O 1L.'«/ iO
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 108367/01, 108334/01
FREDERIC NIECE AND JOAN NIECE
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York\ \\\Q . , 2018
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsFrederic Niece and Joan NieceWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 3-23694FF 8 L E D
{N0799638-I}NOV 27 }018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
21: ? ?? ?!?- L.^ i JIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.) !
/L...THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 116800/01
EDWARD NEVERMANN AND JEANNEVERMANN
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkW , 2018
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEdward Nevermann and Joan NevermannWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 2383-23917AF 8 L E D
NOV 87 1018{N0799638-1}
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
ir-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONiNYCALj I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.) NOV 2 1 m
This Document Relates to:f J Y b L; •Index No.: 100406/08 X I
NANCY ROURKE ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF
HUGH MCMUNN AND DOROTHYMCMUNN
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls
USA Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Atwood & Morrill
Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co.,
Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New rk. New YorkI fV , 2018li
fi
/
»Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for Defendant
Administratrix of the Estate Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A WeirValves & Controls USA Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
/
Attorney for PlajnjifjlNancy Routkeof Hugh McMunmarid Dorothy McMunnBELLUCK & FbxfLLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
NOV 2 7 ^018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 963-74
; iSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
- V & I
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
; r - C'- L;
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 116837/01, 116800/01
CHARLES MCNAMARA AND THERESAMCNAMARA
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
N Yiork, NteDated: New rk. Nfew York, 2018
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsCharles McNamara and Theresa McNamaraWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C . 2383-23917M
F 8 L E D{N0799638-1}
NOV 27 10WCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK O g1MBIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
3:„3.3T - C!Y'LTlYS SU:'v_:
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 108334/01, 108369/01
PETER D. LISI AS ADMINISTRATOR FORTHE ESTATE OF ANTHONY LISI
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkV .2018
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Anthony LisiWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 2383-23694DF i L E D
{N0804905-1 } NOV 27 ^018
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
L l U
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
:
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
i . .
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 115220/01, 115241/01
FRANCESCA LAPIANA, INDIVIDUALLYAND AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIX OF THE
ESTATE OF ROSARIO LAPIANA NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New ’V ork, Nfew York
\ \ ^ , 2018
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Rosario LapianaW1LENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
F I L E DMANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C 2383-23690P
NOV 2 7 )018{N0804905-1 }
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
f / o ?I v - 4 & i
'! n ri r>
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 116800/01, 116840/01
ELINOR JUDGEAND
GORDON JUDGE NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, fyew York
, 2018IL43
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsElinor Judge and Gordon JudgeWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SP1TZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
F J L E DMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.sc 2383-23917J
NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICNEW YORK
{N0804905-1 }
F
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
• (. C t* - »' £ 1
*' ^ r. aIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
iNYCAL; I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 115916/06
LUCIENINGRASSIAAND
CONSTANCE INGRASSIA UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Weir Valves & Controls, Individually, as successor to and
doing business as Atwood & Morrill Company, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and
cross-claims against Weir Valves & Controls, Individually, as successor to and doing business as
Atwood & Morrill Company, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no
opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Weir Valves & Controls,
Individually, as successor to and doing business as Atwood & Morrill Company, are dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New fork, New York1L4
/
Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantWeir Valves & Controls, Individually, assuccessor to and doing business as Atwood &Morrill CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-34
Attorney fibr/P|amtiff(s)Lucien Ingrasslta and Constance IngrassiaBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
P I L E D/~\ NOV 27 )018SO ORDERED,
Hon. Manuel J. MendezCOUNTY CLERKS OFFICE
NEW YORKMANUEL X MENDEZJ .S .C
963-17
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
!_
V/ •J[V' Vf 9 1t \ <! jLi -
iNYCALi I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, M.)
i
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 116800/01, 116842/01
THOMAS HANNAMAND
SYLVIA HANNAM NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
]IJ3 , 2018
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsThomas Hannam and Sylvia HannamW1LENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C F S L E 0 2383-23917M
NOV 2 7 2018{N0804905-I }
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
!SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
?
’ '** \ »
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 108421/01, 108435/01
LEROY EMERY
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New A rork, New York
\{ ft , 2018
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsLeroy EmeryWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
F 9 L E OMANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C. ^383-23695D
v-
NOV 2 7 2018{N0804905-1}
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK y
! i iIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
NOV 2 1 20 - 3
This Document Relates to:C.i' - 'L
Index No.: 190019/08 t
DIANA DURAN, AS EXECUTRIX OFTHE ESTATE OF CARMELO DURAN,
DECEASED, AND SEBESBRINDAMALDONADO DURAN
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls
USA Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Atwood & Morrill
Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co.,
Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,|New York\\ 7 - 2018
'/
INicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for Defendanty Executrix of the Estate of Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir
, deceased, and Sebesbrinda Valves & Controls USA Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for PlaiDiana Durarj,Carmelo DMaldonado DuranBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
'(s
F i L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez NOV 2 7 mMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S COUNIYCLEfiK*m*r<m963-107
13\ V -i. i- ^or* nSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
!
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
i :
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 115220/01, 115248/01
MICHELE DENICHILO
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New ''fork.F ew York\ l |3 .2018
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY &KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsMichele DenichiloWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ .S.C.
F a L E D2383-236901
NOV 27 2018{N0804905-1 )
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
iSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
’ • v i 21 im\ -J 'i• NYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, M.)
;
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.:117331/01, 1176521/01
ELIZABETH DINO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASEXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF
SALVATORE DINOI NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,JiT13w York
2018
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Salvatore DinoiWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SP1TZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez F I L E DMANUEL J- MENDEZ
J.S.C 2383-240681
NOV 47 2018
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK
{N0804905-1}
f , n * 9 f^ Qi < .. V -1- L.^ < J
!
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
;
L
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 116033/01, 116059/01
ERNEST DONNELLY, JR.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.>
Dated: New ^ ork, New York1_3 . 2018
1Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsErnest Donnelly, Jr.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
NOV 27
f-OUNTY CLERKS OFFICEC0U
N£W YORK
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ .S .C{N0804905-1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
\\ ^ V & x LJ 1 0
i NYCALj I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, M.)
i
r : •'
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 117331/01, 117350/01
LEONARD DORFMANAND
JUDITH DORFMAN NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkU I S .2018
UKevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsLeonard Dorfinan and Judith DorfmanWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J- MENDEZ F S LJ.S.C.
NOV 27 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
a3-24068K
{N0804905-1 }
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONiNYCALi I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.) £ 1 20!3
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 111767/08 i
ADELINE CHOBOT-SPITZER, iEXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF |
ARMAND DEL CIOPPO AND CARMELA i UNOPPOSED SUMMARYDEL CIOPPO, INDIVIDUALLY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls
USA Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Atwood & Morrill
Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co.,
Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkU L3 , 2018
j
/
Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for Defendant
(bot-Spitzer, Executrix of the Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A Weirand Del Cioppo and Carmela Del Valves & Controls USA Inc.
MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney fof Pjaintiff(s)AdelineEstate ofCioppo, IndividuallyBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
F 8 LSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
NOV ii iowMANUEL J.MENDEZ
J.S.r 963-100
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
f-V 2 1 2m- avTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: . i
Index No.: 116800/01, 116847/01
ALBERT BREININGAND
PAULINE BREINING NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Y ork, New York
U JjM .2018
Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Kevin M. Berry, Esq. <
Attorney for PlaintiffsAlbert Breining and Pauline BreiningWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c F i L E &-23917C
NOV 27 2018{N0804905-1}
COUNTY CLERK'SOFRCNfW YOLK
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION; NYCALj I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)
iF J V 2 1 r. r, '•g/ :L. vj.
I
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 106691/02,
PHYLLIS BUTCHER UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice, and after notice
to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating
Corp., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NewjYorkjNew York, 2018U-
z
Attorney for Plaintiffts)Phyllis ButcherWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
ok, Esq.KerryAttorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUELJ.MENDEZ
J .S .C F I L E D 2383-25631G
NOV 2 7 2J018
COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK
tSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK YJV 2 1 20 i 3? •'» • :
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
: NYCALj I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 106691/02,
PHYLLIS BUTCHER UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint
and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation,
are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NewlYorkftNew YorkV l l K o l , 2018
Attorney for Plaintiffs)Phyllis ButcherWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
KerrvCnn M. Cook. Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. F f l L EJ.S.C. 1235-5153
NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLEWS OFFICE
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION! NYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13; (Mendez, J.)
~ ?.
ft J /M t
i v J 'v 21 imThis Document Relates to: /• ’ ST 13NYS SUP;;; COURT - O' / J iIndex No.: 106691/02,
<* .*U.f iPHYLLIS BUTCHER UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER jh
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint
and cross-claims against Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.,
are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Nev4 York,iNew YorkUUS(o \ , 2018
Attorney forpfamti^sfl.Phyllis ButcherWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
s^Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Ke:
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 1122-5630F 3 L E D
NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK