FMEA - Maquina Neumatica Soriano

8/6/2019 FMEA - Maquina Neumatica Soriano

1/20

(Information Sheet)

PFMEA Number:

Process Name:

Process Responsibility:

Prepared By:

Affected Product(s):

PFMEA Key Date:

PFMEA Origination Date:

PFMEA Revision Date:

Core Team Members:

Potential Failure Modes andEffects Analysis


2/20

#

1 0 0 0

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

ProcessFunction (Step)

Potential FailureModes (process

defects)

Potential FailureEffects (KPOVs)

SEV

Class

PotentialCauses of

Failure (KPIVs)

OCC

CurrentProcessControls

DET

RPN

RecommendActions

ResponsiPerson

Target Da

Falla en botonaccionador

Falla enEnergizamiento

Falla enCalibracin

Falla en PanelControl


3/20

#Process

Function (Step)


defects)


SEV

Class

PotentialCauses of

Failure (KPIVs)

OCC


DET

RPN

RecommendActions

ResponsiblePerson &

Target Date

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0


4/20

#Process

Function (Step)


defects)


SEV

Class

PotentialCauses of

Failure (KPIVs)

OCC


DET

RPN

RecommendActions

ResponsiblePerson &

Target Date

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5


5/20

#Process

Function (Step)


defects)


SEV

Class

PotentialCauses of

Failure (KPIVs)

OCC


DET

RPN

RecommendActions

ResponsiblePerson &

Target Date

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0


6/20

#Process

Function (Step)


defects)


SEV

Class

PotentialCauses of

Failure (KPIVs)

OCC


DET

RPN

RecommendActions

ResponsiblePerson &

Target Date

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5


7/20

#Process

Function (Step)


defects)


SEV

Class

PotentialCauses of

Failure (KPIVs)

OCC


DET

RPN

RecommendActions

ResponsiblePerson &

Target Date

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0


8/20

#Process

Function (Step)


defects)


SEV

Class

PotentialCauses of

Failure (KPIVs)

OCC


DET

RPN

RecommendActions

ResponsiblePerson &

Target DateA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

00


9/20

DET

RPN

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!


10/20

DET

RPN

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!


11/20

DET

RPN

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!


12/20


13/20


14/20

DET

RPN

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!


15/20

DET

RPN

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!

#VALUE

!


16/20

Effect Criteria: Severity of Effect Defined Ranking

10

9

Very High 8

High 7

Moderate 6

Low 5

Very Low 4

Minor 3

Very Minor 2

None No effect. 1

Hazardous:Without Warning

May endanger operator. Failure mode affects safe vehicle operation and / orinvolves noncompliance with government regulation. Failure will occurWITHOUTwarning.

Hazardous: WithWarning

May endanger operator. Failure mode affects safe vehicle operation and / orinvolves noncompliance with government regulation. Failure will occurWITHwarning.

Major disruption to production line. 100% of product may have to be scrapped.Vehicle / item inoperable, loss of primary function. Customer very dissatisfied.

Minor disruption to production line. Product may have to be sorted and a portion(less than 100%) scrapped. Vehicle operable, but at a reduced level ofperformance. Customer dissatisfied.

Minor disruption to production line. A portion (less than 100%) may have to bescrapped (no sorting). Vehicle / item operable, but some comfort / convenienceitem(s) inoperable. Customers experience discomfort.

Minor disruption to production line. 100% of product may have to be reworked.Vehicle / item operable, but some comfort / convenience item(s) operable atreduced level of performance. Customer experiences some dissatisfaction.

Minor disruption to production line. The product may have to be sorted and aportion (less than 100%) reworked. Fit / finish / squeak / rattle item does notconform. Defect noticed by most customers.

Minor disruption to production line. A portion (less than 100%) of the product mayhave to be reworked on-line but out-of-station. Fit / finish / squeak / rattle item doesnot conform. Defect noticed by average customers.

Minor disruption to production line. A portion (less than 100%) of the product mayhave to be reworked on-line but in-station. Fit / finish / squeak / rattle item does notconform. Defect noticed by discriminating customers.


17/20


18/20

Detection Ranking

Almost Impossible Test content detects < 80 % of failures 10

Very Remote Test content must detect 80 % of failures 9

Remote Test content must detect 82.5 % of failures 8

Very Low Test content must detect 85 % of failures 7

Low Test content must detect 87.5 % of failures 6

Moderate Test content must detect 90 % of failures 5

Moderately High Test content must detect 92.5 % of failures 4

High Test content must detect 95 % of failures 3

Very High Test content must detect 97.5 % of failures 2

Almost Certain Test content must detect 99.5 % of failures 1

Criteria: Liklihood the existence of a defect will bedetected by test content before product advances to

next or subsequent process


19/20

Steps in the FMEA Process

1. Select the Process FMEAteam

2. Develop a Process Map andidentify all process steps

3. List all the Key ProcessOutputs to satisfy internal andexternal customerrequirements

4. For each Process Step, listKey Process Inputs

5. For the Process Define matrixrelating Product Outputs toProcess Variables

6. Rank the inputs according toimportance

7. Start the process FMEA

8. For each Processthat it can vary (cidentify associateand Effects

9. List all other Cauvariability) and aand Effects

10. Assign Severity,Detection rating t

11. Calculate the risk(RPN) for each pmode scenario

12. Determine recoto reduce all RP

13. Take appropri

14. Re-calculate allNote: When doing a Process FMEA, first assume the material is gobad. Then assume the process is good, but the material is bad. L ast, aunsafe.

Note: When doing a Process FMEA, first assume the material is go obad. Then assume the process is good, but the material is bad. L ast, as

unsafe.


20/20

Input, List waysauses) andd Failure Modes

ses (sources ofsociated FMs

ccurrence ando each Cause

priority numbertential failure

mended actionss

te actions

RPNsd, but the process issume the process is, but the process is

ume the process is

Documents

FMEA - Maquina Neumatica Soriano