Florida Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local …agenda.myescambia.com/docs/2017/REGBCC/20170817_3913... · 2017-08-04 · Pensacola Perdido Key Gulf of Mexico Perdido

01 August 2017

Perdido Key, Escambia County, FL olsen associates, inc. LGFR 2018-2019

PERDIDO KEY, FL BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT

Florida Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request

FY 2018 – 2019

Engineering Design, Construction, Construction Management, Monitoring

LOCAL SPONSOR: Escambia County, FL

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FY2018/19 Local Government Funding Request Beach Projects Application

PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION Local Sponsor: Local Sponsor Federal ID Number (FEID): Contact Name: Title: Mailing Address Line 1: Mailing Address Line 2: City: Zip: Telephone: Email Address: Additional Contact Information: PART II: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that all information provided with this application is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Local Sponsor Date Printed Name (Electronic/scanned signature accepted)

01 August 2017

Perdido Key, FL, Beach Restoration Project olsen associates, inc. FY 2018-2019 Funding Request 1

Perdido Key, FL Beach Restoration Project – Gulf Beach

R-19 to R-34, Escambia County FL

FDEP FY 2018-2019 Local Government Funding Request

PART III: EVALUATION CRITERIA 1. Project Name: Perdido Key, FL, Beach Restoration Project – Gulf Beach 2. Project Description: The Perdido Key, FL, Beach Restoration Project proposes, by permit, to place up to 1.25 million cubic yards (Mcy – pay volume) of beach quality material along three separate segments of the westernmost 6.5 miles of Gulf of Mexico shoreline at Perdido Key in Escambia County, FL (Figure 1). At present it is proposed to construct only the eastern Gulf Beach segments,

consisting of beach nourishment and dune restoration for the 3.0-mile beach segment between FDEP monuments R-19 and R-34 (tapering onto Perdido Key State Park on the west end and onto the Gulf Islands National Seashore on the east end), totaling approximately 1.05 million cubic yards of sand. The dune feature along this nourishment segment will be restored where needed via sand placement and the installation of salt-tolerant vegetation and sand-fencing. The beach fill material will be excavated from an 84-acre offshore borrow site located approximately 1.1 to 1.8 miles offshore of Perdido Key near R-10 to R-11. Up to 1.5 Mcy of material may ultimately be excavated from the borrow site to achieve the 1.05 Mcy design fill template (pay volume).

Following the severe storm impacts of Hurricane Ivan in September 2004, Escambia County, FL, initiated a feasibility study for restoration of the beaches of Perdido Key, FL. The feasibility study addressed the short- and long-term shoreline and sand volume change trends in the project area -- including storm impacts, reviewed potential project logistics issues, analyzed the available alternatives for beach management, and recommended construction of a full–scale beach nourishment project supplied from a remote sand source (OAI, 2006). An offshore geotechnical sand search was conducted in 2005 to develop a borrow site for the project. The entire shoreline segment from R-1 to R-32 is designated by FDEP BBCS as a Critically Eroded shoreline. In the last several years, the project shoreline was impacted by Hurricanes Gustav and Ike (September 2008), Tropical Storm Ida (November 2009), and Hurricane Isaac (2012). The shoreline was likewise impacted by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in Spring/Summer 2010 and its subsequent cleanup operations.

3. Use of Requested Program Funds: For FY 2018-2019, work will consist of the construction of the Gulf Beach restoration project itself, presently estimated to include the placement of 1.05 million cubic yards of sand (approx.) and the installation of salt-tolerant vegetation and sand fencing where needed along the existing dune feature. Additional funds are requested to assist in the permit-required sea turtle nest monitoring and relocation services, shorebird monitoring requirements, and beach tilling and scarp removal activities. Costs associated with the Year-1 monitoring of the project are likewise included with the construction cost.

01 August 2017


470,000475,000480,000485,000490,000

1,01

5,00

01,

020,

000

1,02

5,00

01,

030,

000

1,03

5,00

01,

040,

000

1,04

5,00

01,

050,

000

1,05

5,00

0

Ea

stin

g (

ft,

NA

D8

3)

Northing (ft, NAD83)

Pe

ns

aco

la

Gu

lf o

f M

exic

o

Pe

rdid

oK

ey

Per

did

o B

ay

Ora

ng

e B

each

ES

CA

MB

IA C

OU

NT

Y, F

L

olse

n as

soci

ates

, in

c.

FL

GA

AL

MS

LA

TX

SC

*

Pe

rdid

o K

ey

PK

SP

ALABAMAFLORIDA

Gu

lf B

each

Pro

po

sed

Off

sho

re B

orr

ow

Sit

e

0

2

,000

5

,00

0 F

T

GR

AP

HIC

SC

ALE

PK

We

st

Flo

r-B

am

a

Joh

nso

nB

ea

ch

Sa

nd

y K

ey

Acc

ess

#3

Acc

ess

#2

Ea

stP

ark

We

stP

ark

Ed

en

Fig

ure

1

Loc

atio

n M

ap:

Per

dido

Key

, FL

, Bea

ch R

esto

rati

on P

roje

ct.

The

bea

ch s

egm

ent f

rom

R-1

to R

-32

is d

esig

nate

d by

the

FD

EP

as

a C

riti

call

y E

rode

d sh

orel

ine.

01 August 2017


4. Mapping See Table 1, and the attached public access and parking maps. 5. Length of Project Boundary in Feet (total Critical restored length): 15,635 ft CONTINUED…

01 August 2017


6. Eligibility: Public Access Points and Public Lodging Establishments:

Table 1 - Access Points and Public Lodging Establishments Perdido Key, FL, Beach Restoration Project

Location/ Eligible Shoreline

name (no overlap)

P erdido Key Sta te P a rk P erdido Key Dr. R-19 to R-21.5 Recreatio na l 2475 2475

La Vis ta (vacant) P erdido Key Dr. R-21.5 Co mm./Res . 130

Co mpas s P o int P erdido Key Dr. R-21.7 Co mm./Res . 300

Sea Sho re P erdido Key Dr. R-21.9 Co mm./Res . 100

Es cambia Co unty # 3 Rive r Rd. P erdido Key Dr. R-22 Seco ndary Acces s . 100 25 25 100

Spinnaker P erdido Key Dr. R-22.1 Co mm./Res . 125

So lana Sho res P erdido Key Dr. R-22.2 Co mm./Res . 80

Sea Oa ts P erdido Key Dr. Co mm./Res . 70

s fr P erdido Key Dr. Res identia l 75

s fr P erdido Key Dr. Res identia l 65

Nautilus (vacant) P erdido Key Dr. R-22.5 Co mm./Res . 95

Sfr (3 lo ts ) P erdido Key Dr. R-22.8 Res identia l 300

Lo s t Key Landing P erdido Key Dr. R-23 Co mm./Res . 100 0

Ocean Breeze P erdido Key Dr. R-23.2 Co mm./Res . 195 0

P e lican P o int (vacant) P erdido Key Dr. R-23.4 Co mm./Res . 300 0

vacant P erdido Key Dr. R-23.5 Res identia l 100 0

Gull P o int (vacant) P erdido Key Dr. R-23.7 Co mm./Res . 200 0

Sugar Sands (vacant) P erdido Key Dr. R-23.9 Co mm./Res . 100 0

Windemere P erdido Key Dr. R-24 Co mm./Res . 300 0

P alms o f P e rdido P erdido Key Dr. R-24.3 Co mm./Res . 225 0

The Mo o rings P erdido Key Dr. R-24.4 Co mm./Res . 75 0

s fr P erdido Key Dr. R-24.5 Res identia l 190 0

Do ry P erdido Key Dr. R-24.6 Co mm./Res . 100 0

vacant P erdido Key Dr. R-24.8 Co mm./Res . 305 0

Es cambia Co unty # 2

R-25

Gulf Side Villa P erdido Key Dr. R-25.1 Co mm./Res . 80

La Riva P erdido Key Dr. R-25.5 Co mm./Res . 525

Gulf Key P erdido Key Dr. R-25.8 Co mm./Res . 100

vacant P erdido Key Dr. R-26 Co mm./Res . 395

Blue Surf (vacant) P erdido Key Dr. R-26.3 Co mm./Res . 100

vacant P erdido Key Dr. R-26.5 Co mm./Res . 205

La Mer (vacant) P erdido Key Dr. R-26.6 Co mm./Res . 300 0

vacant P erdido Key Dr. R-26.9 Co mm./Res . 100 0

Mirabella P erdido Key Dr. R-27.2 Co mm./Res . 400 0

P erdido Sho res P erdido Key Dr. R-27.3 Co mm./Res . 100 0

Co ro nado P erdido Key Dr. R-27.4 Co mm./Res . 105 0

P erdido Sho res P erdido Key Dr. R-27.5 Co mm./Res . 105 0

Vacant (o ld Lillian’s ) P erdido Key Dr. R-27.8 Co mm./Res . 210 0

Ocean Breeze P erdido Key Dr. R-27.9 Co mm./Res . 115 0

P erdido Skye P erdido Key Dr. R-28 Co mm./Res . 115 0

P erdido Sun P erdido Key Dr. R-28.1 Co mm./Res . 315 0

P alacio P erdido Key Dr. R-28.3 Co mm./Res . 200 0

Indigo P erdido Key Dr. R-28.7 Co mm./Res . 485

Beach Co lo ny P erdido Key Dr. R-29.3 Co mm./Res . 580

Es cambia Co unty # 1

Sandy Key Dr

La P laya 13555 Sandy Key Dr. R-29.5 Co mm./Res . 270 270

Sandy Key R-30 Co mm./Res . 775 0

Sfr (12 lo ts ) P aras o l P lace R-31 Res identia l 900

Lands End J o hns o n Beach Rd. R-31.4 Co mm./Res . 125

Vis ta de l Mar (vacant) J o hns o n Beach Rd. R-31.5 Co mm./Res . 325

Gulf Is lands Natio nal Seas ho re J o hns o n Beach Rd. R-32 – R-34 P rimary Acces s 2,450 2,450

15 ,6 3 5 10 ,3 3 5

66.10%

Public units or parking spaces

Address R-mon Type of AccessWidth of Access/

Frontage (ft)Total units or parking spaces

Eligible fro m Acces s # 3

530(530 ft)


790

(790 ft)

P e rdido Key Dr. R-25 Seco ndary Acces s 100 25 25

1,050

100


1,320

(1,320 ft)

Eligible fro m Acces s # 1 (1,050 ft)

To ta l fo r Gulf B e a c h

50

Eligible fro m Acces s # 1 (270 ft)

Eligible fro m GINS P rimary P arking

1,200(1,200 ft)

Sandy Key Dr. R-29.4 Seco ndary Acces s 50 25 25

01 August 2017


7. Schedule and Budget:

1‐Aug‐17

Project Catego

ryTask

Total Cost

Federal

State(

1)

Local

Reform

ulation (survey, d

esign update)

$250,000

$0

$82,625

$167,375

Construction Documen

ts, B

idding

$150,000

$0

$49,575

$100,425

Beach Nourishment (2018‐19)

$11,706,000

$0

$3,868,833

$7,837,167

Construction Obsv. / Contract Mgm

.$400,000

$0

$132,200

$267,800

Tilling/Scarp Rem

oval (YR

‐1 Spring 2020)

$25,000

$0

$8,263

$16,738

Physical M

onitoring (YR‐1, 2

020)

$110,000

$0

$36,355

$73,645

Shorebird M

onitoring (Construction period)

$9,300

$0

$3,074

$6,226

Shorebird M

onitoring (YR‐1 2020)

$9,300

$0

$3,074

$6,226

Sea Tu

rtle M

onitoring/Relocation (Construction Period)

$45,000

$0

$14,873

$30,128

Sea Tu

rtle m

onitoring (YR

‐1, 2

020)

$18,000

$0

$5,949

$12,051

2018/2019

TOTA

L$12,722,600

$0

$4,204,819

$8,517,781

Project Catego

ryTask

Total Cost

Federal

State(

1)

Local

Monitoring

Included

with construction, see above

$0

$0

$0

$0

2019/2020

TOTA

L$0

$0

$0

$0

Project Catego

ryTask

Total Cost

Federal

State(

1)

Local

Physical M

onitoring (YR‐2)

$116,699

$0

$38,569

$78,130

Tilling/Scarp Rem

oval (YR

‐2)

$20,000

$0

$6,610

$13,390

Shorebird M

onitoring (YR‐2)

$9,300

$0

$3,074

$6,226

Biological M

onitoring ‐ Inc. Sea Turtles (YR

‐2)

$25,000

$0

$8,263

$16,738

2020/2021

TOTA

L$170,999

$0

$56,515

$114,484

Project Catego

ryTask

Total Cost

Federal

State(

1)

Local

Physical M

onitoring (YR‐3, incl. b

orrow site)

$130,200

$0

$43,031

$87,169

Tilling/Scarp Rem

oval (YR

‐3)

$20,000

$0

$6,610

$13,390

Shorebird M

onitoring (YR‐3)

$9,300

$0

$3,074

$6,226

Biological M


‐3)

$25,000

$0

$8,263

$16,738

2021/2022

TOTA

L$184,500

$0

$60,977

$123,523

Table 2 ‐ LONG RANGE BUDGET

PLA

N

Perdido Key, FL, Bea

ch Restoration Project

Monitoring

2018/20

19

Design

Construction

2019/20

20

2020/20

21

Monitoring

2021/20

22

Monitoring

01 August 2017


7. Schedule and Budget:

Project Catego

ryTask

Total Cost

Federal

State(

1)

Local

Physical M

onitoring (YR‐4)

$120,200

(3)

$0

$0

$120,200

Shorebird M

onitoring (YR‐4)

$9,300

$0

$3,074

$6,226

Biological M


‐4)

$25,000

(3)

$0

$8,263

$16,738

2022/2023

TOTA

L$154,500

$0

$11,336

$143,164

Project Catego

ryTask

Total Cost

Federal

State(

1)

Local

Physical M

onitoring (YR‐5)

Shorebird M

onitoring (YR‐5)

Biological M


‐5)

Project Catego

ryTask

Total Cost

Federal

State(

1)

Local

Design

Project Reform

ulation/N

EW PER

MIT

Physical M

onitoring (YR‐6)

Shorebird M

onitoring (YR‐6)

Biological M


‐6)

Project Catego

ryTask

Total Cost

Federal

State(

1)

Local

Design

Construction Documen

ts, B

idding

Physical M

onitoring (YR‐7)

Shorebird M

onitoring (YR‐7)

Biological M


‐7)

Project Catego

ryTask

Total Cost

Federal

State(

1)

Local

Beach Ren

ourishmen

t (late spring/summer)

Construction Obsv. / Contract Mgm

.

Rep

orting/Compliance

Tilling/Scarp Rem

oval (YR

‐1)

Physical M

onitoring (YR‐1)

Shorebird M

onitoring (YR‐1)

Biological M


‐1)

Project Catego

ryTask

Total Cost

Federal

State(

1)

Local

Monitoring

YR‐1 tasks Included

with construction, see above

(1)

Cost Sharing @ 33.05%

2027/2028

2022/2023

Monitoring

2023/2024

Monitoring

2026/2027

2024/2025

Monitoring

2025/2026

Monitoring

Construction

Monitoring

01 August 2017


8. Severity of Erosion: Criterion will be calculated by the Department. and 9. Threats to Upland Structures: Criterion will be calculated by the Department. The feasibility study addressed the short- and long-term shoreline changes along the project study area, with particular attention to the recent impacts of Hurricanes Ivan, Dennis, and Katrina. Long-term shoreline change studies (e.g. Foster et al., 1999, Dean et al., 1998) have described the overall trends of severe pre-nourishment erosion immediately west of Pensacola Pass, on National Seashore property, of up to -9 ft/yr of recession. That long-term erosional signal decreases to approximately -1.0 ft/yr, heading west alongshore into the eastern developed portion of Perdido Key (to roughly R-026). Westward thereof, long-term shoreline changes reveal a trend of relative stability of shoreline position from R-025 to R-001 (Foster et al., 1999). Browder and Dean (1999) performed similar analyses and included an overview of the 1989-1991 beach disposal operations at the eastern end of Perdido Key. That project resulted in the placement of 5.4 million cubic yards of sand along a 4.5-mile segment of the National Seashore property. The sediment budget prepared by Browder and Dean (1999) suggests that the beach disposal project may have contributed a substantial volume of sand to the beaches to the west, perhaps masking any erosion problems in the 1990’s. Due to the severe impacts from Hurricane Ivan, and the subsequent impacts of the smaller storms Arlene, Dennis, and Katrina (all in 2005), the entire shoreline segment from R-1 to R-32 is critically eroded. The feasibility study details the impacts of these storms. Pre- and post-Ivan LIDAR data reveal the substantial loss of sand from the upper elevations of the dry, recreational beach. Volume change estimates between May 2004 and December 2004 indicate an average loss of over -25 cy/ft above Mean High Water. Concurrent with this loss is an average recession of -16 ft at MHW, while the upper elevations of the beach, characterized by the +7ft contour, receded by an average of over -90 ft as the upper beach was planed off during the storm. More recent beach profile data, extending seaward well beyond survey closure depth, reveal a substantial deposition of sand beyond the natural bar in the profile (Olsen Associates, 2006). The project area was impacted in September 2008 by the back-to-back impacts of Hurricanes Gustav and Ike, and again in November 2009 by Tropical Storm Ida. These storms serve to interrupt any natural recovery of the beach that may occur. MHW shoreline changes from 2007 to 2010 reveal a great deal of variability but general indicate a net MHWL advance of roughly 25 ft from R-1 to R-12, a net retreat of -17 ft from R-13 to R-21, and a net retreat of -5 ft from R-22 to R-31. Most recently, the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion on 20 April 2010, and the subsequent (and ongoing) oil leak from the well have significantly impacted the project shoreline. 10. Recreation and Economic Benefits Commercial/Recreational Property Length: 13,510 ft (of 15,635 ft)

Percentage of Comm./Rec Property: 78.41% Current Contract eligibility/proposed new eligibility 66.1%

01 August 2017


Table 3 Project shoreline usage – Commercial, Recreation, and Private Residential shorefront lengths and percentages.

11. Availability of Federal Funds

Is the project Federally authorized by WRDA (Y/N)? NO AUTHORIZATION DATE: n/a EXPIRATION DATE: n/a Does this project phase have a Federal Project Cooperative NO Agreement, or other Federal funding agreement (Y/N)? If so, attach a copy of the document: n/a Federal cost share percentage available for this project: 0% Is this project funded through FEMA for storm repairs? NO Provide a copy of the signed Project Worksheet. n/a

12. Local Sponsor Financial and Administrative Commitment Is funding for the project in local sponsor’s 10-year comprehensive financial plan (Y/N)? NO

See Table 2. The County follows that 10-yr plan. Is funding provided through a source established by referendum (Y/N)? NO

Please provide a copy or web link to the referendum. n/a Is funding provided by a third party (Y/N)? NO What is the percentage of total project costs provide by the third party? 0%

Shoreline Zoning

Length (ft) Name Use Percentage Designation

2,475 Perdido Key State Park Recreational 15.8% S‐1PK

525 Compass Point Commercial 3.4% CC‐PK

100 County Parking at River Rd. Recreational 0.6396% S‐1PK

3,000 Spinnaker to R‐25 Commercial 19.2% CC‐PK

100 County Parking at River Rd. Recreational 0.6% S‐1PK

4,860 Gulf Side Villa to La Playa Commercial 31.1% CC‐PK

2,125 Sandy Key to Vista del Mar High‐density Res. 13.6% R‐3PK

2,450 Gulf Islands National Seashore Recreational 15.7% S‐1PK

15,635 ft 100.0%

3.0 miles % ft

53.6% 8,385 Commercial

By Zoning Class 32.8% 5,125 Recreational

13.6% 2,125 Private/Residential

Perdido Key, FL, Beach Restoration ProjectGulf Beach (R-19 to R-34)

01 August 2017


Quarterly Report Compliance (no grant, but all reports filed):

Quarter Due Date Report Remit (approx.) Compliant:

July-September October 30 Oct 2016 YES

October-December January 31 Jan 2017 YES

January-March April 30 Apr 2017 YES

March-June July 31 July 2017 YES

Is there an active State permit for the project? YES

State permit #: JCP #0273340-001 Authorization date: 27 February 2009 Expiration date: 27 February 2019

Is there an active Federal permit for the project? YES

Federal permit #: SAJ-2007-0764 (IP-MBH) Authorization date: 04 December 2009 Expiration date: 27 May 2019

Have local funds been secured for the project? NO

Local funding for the project and its related activities is provided by Escambia County.

Local Sponsor Resolution attached Y/N)? to be provided

An updated Resolution by the Escambia BOCC is forthcoming.

13. Previous State Commitment: Has the Department previously cost shared, reviewed, and approved a feasibility or design phase for this project (Y/N)? YES

The Department has cost-shared in the formulation of an Engineering Feasibility Study, Sand Search, design development and permitting in 2006-2009

Previous State Cost Share percentage 33.05%

(as computed by the FDEP) Feasibility study and initial engineering work performed at higher cost-sharing %) Will this project enhance or increase the longevity of a previously-constructed project (Y/N)? YES Explain: n/a project will protect post-Katrina dune restoration project Will this project nourish a previously restored shoreline? NO

(Full beach nourishment. Dune maintenance projects do not apply) n/a (initial construction proposed herein)

14. Project Performance:

Nourishment Interval (years): Eight (8) years, predicted The project feasibility study evaluated a range of beach restoration alternatives. The relatively mild wave climate (excepting tropical storm events) bodes well for the longevity of the proposed

01 August 2017


beach nourishment project (in excess of seven to eight years of project life prior to requiring renourishment). However, the longevity of any project selected for this region is highly dependent upon the storm climate experienced over the project life. Project performance will be gaged in relation to recent storm events..

15. Mitigation of Inlet Effects: Criterion is calculated by the Department. NO

There currently is no Department-approved bypassing objective for Pensacola Pass. Project shoreline experiences sand starvation from the erosion of the Perdido Key shoreline eastward thereof, which borders Pensacola Pass. Previous studies (Browder and Dean, 1999, OAI 2006) have documented the impacts of Pensacola Pass upon the Perdido Key shoreline.

16. Use of Innovative Applications of Existing Technologies: Does the project address erosion in a method that is economically competitive with nourishment, that will not adversely affect the conservation of fish and wildlife, including endangered or threatened species, or their habitats, and that is designed to demonstrate an innovative application of existing technologies (Y/N)? NO Explain: n/a. Has the project been documented to be effective and demonstrated technologies previously untried in the state (Y/N)? NO Explain: n/a

17. Regionalization NO

The project is co-permitted by Escambia County and FL Division of Recreation and Parks. The local funding will be provided by the County.

18. Significance What is the volume of advanced nourishment lost since the last sand placement event of a beach

restoration or nourishment project as measured landward of the Mean High Water Line? (Information should be consistent with annual post-construction monitoring reports)

The proposed project represents the initial restorative nourishment of the shoreline. Has the project eroded into the design template? YES What is the proposed placement volume? ~1,050,000 cy Placement density is approximately 350,000 cy/mile.

01 August 2017


References: Browder, A.E., and Dean, R.G., 1999, “Pensacola Pass, FL, Inlet Management Study,” Coastal and Oceanographic

Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. UFL/COEL -99/002. Dean, R.G., Cheng, J., and Malakar, S.B., 1998, “Characteristics of the Shoreline Change Along the Sandy Beaches

of the State of Florida: An Atlas” Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. UFL/COEL -98/015.

Foster, E.R., Spurgeon, D.L, and Cheng, J., 1999, “Shoreline Change Rate Estimates, Escambia and Santa Rosa

Counties.” Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Beaches and Coastal Systems, Report No. BCS-99-03, Tallahassee, FL.

Olsen Associates, Inc. 2006. “Perdido Key, FL, Feasibility Study for Beach Restoration” Report submitted to

Escambia County, FL, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems, Olsen Associates, Inc., Jacksonville, FL.

01 August 2017


0

AT

TA

CH

ME

NT

S

01 August 2017


1



FY 2018 – 2019

LOCAL SPONSOR RESOLUTION TO BE PROVIDED (Sept. 2017)


DRAFT

1

RESOLUTION R2017-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR STATE FUNDS UNDER SECTION 161.091, FLORIDA STATUTES FOR THE 2017-2018 FLORIDA BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM BUDGET FOR THE PERDIDO KEY NOURISHMENT PROJECT CONSTRUCTION, POST CONSTRUCTION BEACH AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A BEACH MANAGEMENT APPLICATION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the Escambia County Board of County Commissioners believes that

Perdido Key needs a beach nourishment project in the wake of recent hurricanes and

tropical storms; and

WHEREAS, Perdido Key also is recognized by the Department of Environmental

Protection as having a critically eroded shoreline; and

WHEREAS, the Escambia County Board of County Commissioners supports the

Department of Environmental Protection beach nourishment project for Perdido Key

and is willing and able to serve as the local sponsor; and

WHEREAS, the Escambia County Board of County Commissioners intends to

provide the full local funding share from local sources, such as pending RESTORE

funds, to implement such a project as authorized by 161.101, Florida Statutes.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY

COMMISSIONERS OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by

reference.

Section 2. That the Board of County Commissioners hereby supports the Perdido Key

Beach nourishment program, and it is willing to serve as the local sponsor.

DRAFT

2

Section 3. That the Board also is prepared to provide the necessary local funding to

implement this beach nourishment project.

Section 4. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption by the

Board of County Commissioners.

ADOPTED this 3rd day of _August___ 2017.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Doug Underhill, Chairman ATTEST: Pam Childers Clerk of the Circuit Court By:

(SEAL)

01 August 2017


1



FY 2018 – 2019

Hotel License Links


01 August 2017


2

Local Hotel/Motel/Vacation Condo Rental

Website links (For Commercial/Recreational Percentage Calculations)

Windemere https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=AF1B068DB4182A9FDC63F6601B602A38 Palacio https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=1DD6DDA8B6092BE5D21C460921A1399B https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=DA004548712FC7F12920CA03ED048D05 Indigo https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=6A7FF78A5DCC1091D17F410DC5295147 Beach colony II https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=9B90A61862B96F83564B2903FFD91F0F Sandy key https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=EB671CFEC9390B9A3827AA59B23D2266 Grand Caribbean https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=E893BB8F90F80B5C28A02B79E5FB60D4

01 August 2017


1



FY 2018 – 2019

Escambia County Land Use Maps


PER

DID

O K

EY

LAFITTE REEF

FLOOD REEF

CAPTAIN KIDD REEF

KEY LARGO

01,

500

3,00

04,

500

6,00

0 Ft

CU

RR

ENT

ZON

ING

Pla

nnin

g an

d Zo

ning

Dep

t.

This

map

is p

rovi

ded

for i

nfor

mat

ion

purp

oses

onl

y. T

he d

ata

is n

otgu

aran

teed

acc

urat

e or

sui

tabl

efo

r an

y us

e ot

her

than

that

for

whi

ch it

was

gat

here

d.

And

rew

Hol

mer

R-1

PK

R-2

PK

R-3

PK

C-1

PK

CC

PKC

GP

KPR

PKS-

1PK

RIVER

PER

DID

O K

EY

CA

NA

L

INN

ERA

RIT

Y P

OIN

T

LOST

KE

Y

JOH

NSO

N B

EAC

H

SEM

MES

ZOD

IAC

SIGUENZA

LINN

GALVEZ

DUNE

CRUZAT

GONGORA SAIL

FISH

UCITA

RESORT

RENEE

SANDVIEW

CACICA

ONO

GARCONSA

ND

Y K

EY

JAPONICA

ISLES

MAVILLA

WINIFRED

FAIR OAK

DON CARLOS

CA

NA

L A

CORONADA

WAT

ERVI

EW

DESTIN

GROTTO

NA

UTI

LUS

TRANQUILITY

BOB O LINK

PLAY

A

BAY VISTA

PAR

ASO

L

SURFVIEW

CLUB

HOUS

E

CAMPINO

MA

XFLI

PINO

SEM

MES

R-1

PK

R-2

PK

R-3

PK

C-1

PK

CC

PKC

GP

KPR

PKS-

1PK

01,

500

3,00

04,

500

6,00

0 Ft

CU

RR

ENT

ZON

ING

Pla

nnin

g an

d Zo

ning

Dep

t.

This

map

is p

rovi

ded

for i

nfor

mat

ion

purp

oses

onl

y. T

he d

ata

is n

otgu

aran

teed

acc

urat

e or

sui

tabl

efo

r an

y us

e ot

her

than

that

for

whi

ch it

was

gat

here

d.

And

rew

Hol

mer

S-1PK

Documents

Florida Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local …agenda.myescambia.com/docs/2017/REGBCC/20170817_3913... · 2017-08-04 · Pensacola Perdido Key Gulf of Mexico Perdido