34
Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Financial Modeling of Extreme Events

Thomas Weidman

CAS Spring Meeting

May 19, 2003

Page 2: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Financial Modeling of Extreme Events

defining and modeling extreme events – insured vs. total financial impact

financial event modeling correlated events: insured + financialcase study: capital management

Page 3: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

Miami HurricaneSan Francisco EQSeptember 11, 2001

Page 4: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

San Fran EQ Miami 11-Sep

Insured Damage ($B)

Page 5: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

SARSWest Nile VirusSpanish Flu

Page 6: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

SARS virus – first outbreak, China Nov 2002

West Nile Virus – first cases in western world 1999

Influenza – first description from 412 B.C. 0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

Sar wn Flu

cases

deaths

3-DColumn 3

Page 7: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

AsbestosTobaccoShareholders’ Class Actions

Page 8: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

Asbestos: $200 billion cost/$100 billion insured

Tobacco: $246 billion settlement with state governments

Tort Costs: $205 billion/$146 billion insured in 2001, a 14% increase over 2000

[source: US Tort Costs-2002 Update, Tillinghast]

Page 9: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

Stock Market Credit Markets

Page 10: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

Stock Market Returns: (65)% in 1929-33 (37)% in 1973-4 (38)% in 2000-3

Bond Market Returns: (8)% in 1999 (7)% in 19942 worst annual returns

in past 100 years

Page 11: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

Pricing InadequacyReserving Inadequacy

Page 12: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

Pricing Inadequacy

AY loss ratios 10 points higher than CY loss ratios from 1997 through 2000

Reserving Inadequacy

$48 to $92 billion at December 2001 excl asbestos and environmental (ISO)

Page 13: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

Rogue TraderRogue UnderwriterRogue Agent/Broker

Page 14: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Defining Extreme Events

Operational Risk:

Risk of direct and indirect loss resulting from failed or inadequate process, systems, or people and from external events

Difficult to quantify, see Basel accords for treatment by banks

Page 15: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Summary of Risk Types and Models

Risk Type:Risk Type:CatastropheNon-catastropheReservesMarketCreditOperational

Risk Model:Risk Model:AIR, RMS, EQEExposure x freq x sevReserve rangesVaR modelsDefault models ?? Basel II?

Page 16: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Quantifying Extreme Events

Historical dataEmpirical distributionsRealistic Disaster ScenariosModelsFitted probability distributionsExtreme value theory

Page 17: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Extreme Value Theory

Based on work describing the extreme behavior of random processes

Extrapolate the tail of a distribution from underlying data

Distributions to fit tails:– Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD)– Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) Extrapolate the tail

of a distribution from underlying dataProvides a rigorous framework to make

judgments on the possible tail

Page 18: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Extreme Value Theory

GEV family of distributions:

Mn = Max{x1,x2,x3,….xn} for n sufficiently large

“What is the maximum loss to be expected in one year?”

Page 19: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Extreme Value Theory

Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) fits tails of distributions above a threshold

Pr (Y>y+u|y>u) for large u

“What is the expected loss to an excess layer?”

Page 20: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Extreme Value Theory

Resources:

The Management of Losses Arising from Extreme Events, GIRO 2002

Kotz and Nadarajah, Extreme Value Distributions

Coles, An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Events

Embrechts, etal., Modeling Extremal Events

Page 21: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Modeling Financial Events: VAR

VAR is a method of assessing market risk that uses standard statistical techniques routinely used in other technical fields.

VAR is the maximum loss over a target horizon such that there is a low, prespecified probability that the actual loss will be larger.

A bank might have a daily VAR of its trading portfolio of $35 million at the 99% confidence level.

Page 22: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Modeling Financial Events: Credit Risk

Credit Risk ModelsDefault ratesLoss Given Default (LGD)Migration matrices

Page 23: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Modeling Financial Events: Credit Risk

Default Rates = Frequency of loss = MortalityQuantitative Models for Credit Assessment1. Identify characteristics that differentiate

defaulting firms (e.g., Altman 1968); credit scoring models

2. Use credit market prices to estimate default rates

3. Structural models – use equity option pricing techniques (both equity and debt are options on the value of a firm’s assets)

Page 24: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Modeling Financial Events: Credit Risk

Loss Given Default = SeverityMany models assume a constant loss given

default Dependent on both exposure volatility and

recovery rate volatilityCorrelated with default rates?

Page 25: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Modeling Financial Events: Credit Risk

Credit Migration MatricesHistorical changes in credit rating of obligors ‘loss triangles’ for credit ratingsUse S&P or Moody’s dataUseful for portfolio risk assessment, pricing

credit derivatives, capital requirementsDependent on current and future economic

conditions ( recession vs. expansion)

Page 26: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Summary of Risk Types and Models

Risk Type:Risk Type:CatastropheNon-catastropheReservesMarketCreditOperational

Risk Model:Risk Model:AIR, RMS, EQEExposure x freq x sevReserve rangesVaR modelsDefault models ?? Basel II?

Page 27: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Capital Management

Market Share of Industry LossProbable Maximum Loss

(PML)/Aggregate ExposureRisk of Ruin Approach:

Pr (insolvency) < p over time period t

where p is small, e.g., .01 or .001

Page 28: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Capital Management - Issues

Consistent definition across all risk typesCorrelations across risksAllocation/attribution of capital to productAccounting framework: GAAP vs. Fair

Value Matching capital to management

responsibilities, e.g., assets vs. liabilities

Page 29: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Correlated (Extreme) Events

Global warming – storms – virusesLawyers’ fees from tobacco/asbestos winsStock markets – D&O/E&O claimsCredit - Equity pricesPricing – Reserving (e.g., B-F methods)Catastrophes – Demand Surge –

Reinsurance Recoverable

Page 30: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Correlated (Extreme) Events

Exposure: cat Non-cat

reserves market credit Ops

risk

Property X X x x x ?

Casualty x X X x X ?

Surety x X x x X ?

Inv Assets x x x X X ?

Page 31: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Correlated (Extreme) Events

Cas

cat

Cas

Non-cat

Cas

reserves

Cas

market

Cas

credit

Cas

ops

Prop-cat Low Low Low Low Low ?Prop-non-cat

Low Med Low Low Low ?

Prop reserves

Low Low Med Low Low ?

Prop market

Low Low Low High Med ?

Prop- credit

Low Low Low Med High ?

Page 32: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Correlated (Extreme) Events

Generally impossible to model joint distributions of risks (unless multivariate normal)

Therefore:Estimate distributions for each risk typeCombine distributions into a joint

distribution using ‘copulas’

Page 33: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Correlated (Extreme) Events

Copulas:Multivariate functions that combine marginal

distributions into a joint distributionUsing a normal copula leads to a simpler

approach for Monte Carlo simulation of correlated variables

CAS papers by Wang (1998) and Meyers (1999)

Page 34: Financial Modeling of Extreme Events Thomas Weidman CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2003

Financial Modeling of Extreme Events

Past experience lacks credibility

Current state of the art:Sophisticated risk models across all types of risk Integration/Correlation of risk models important

to management, rating agencies and regulatorsMajor role for actuaries