Upload
emile-m-al-mayah
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
1/19
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
2/19
C h a p t e r 6
Example: Turbulent flow in a pipe
+et, fluid property (e.g., temperature or composition) at
point 1
fluid property at point 2
u
y
%ssume t!at t!e velocity profile is flat-, t!at is, t!e velocity
is uniform over t!e cross"sectional area. T!is situation is
analyed in /&le .0 and Fig. ..
Fluid n Fluid ut
Figure .0
oint 1 oint 2
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
3/19
C h a p t e r 6
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
4/19
C h a p t e r 6
Example 6.5
(a) relating t!e mass flow rate of li$uid at 2, w2, to t!e mass flow
rate of li$uid at 1, wt,
(b) relating t!e concentration of a c!emical species at 2 to t!e
concentration at 1. %ssume t!at t!e li$uid is incompressible.
Solution
(a) First we ma5e an overall material balance on t!e pipe
segment in $uestion. #ince t!ere can be no accumulation(incompressible fluid),
material in 6 material out ( ) ( )1 2w t w t ⇒ =
For t!e pipe section illustrated in Fig. .0, find t!e transfer
functions:
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
5/19
C h a p t e r 6 (b) bserving a very small cell of material passing point 1 at time
t , we note t!at in contains Vc1(t ) units of t!e c!emical species of
interest w!ere V is t!e total volume of material in t!e cell. f, attime t 7 , t!e cell passes point 2, it contains units of
t!e species. f t!e material moves in plug flow, not mi&ing at all
wit! ad8acent material, t!en t!e amount of species in t!e cell is
constant:
utting ("3) in deviation form and ta5ing +aplace transforms
yields t!e transfer function,
( )
( )2
1 1
W s
W s
′
=′
' ( )2 'Vc t +
( ) ( )2 1' ("3)Vc t Vc t + =
or
( ) ( )2 1' ("31)c t c t + =
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
6/19
C h a p t e r 6
%n e$uivalent way of writing ("31) is
( ) ( )2 1 ' ("32)c t c t = −
if t!e flow rate is constant. utting ("32) in deviation form and
ta5ing +aplace transforms yields
( )
( )2 '
1("33)
sC s
eC s
−′
=′
Time Delays (continued)
Transfer Function 9epresentation:
( )
( )' ("2) s
Y se
U s
−=
;ote t!at !as units of time (e.g., minutes, !ours)'
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
7/19
C h a p t e r 6
Polynomial Approximations to
For purposes of analysis using analytical solutions to transfer
functions, polynomial appro&imations for are commonly
used. /&le: simulation software suc! as
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
8/19
C h a p t e r 6
2. Padé pproxi!ations:
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
9/19
C h a p t e r 6
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
10/19
Approximation of Higher-rder Transfer
!unctions
'
1' ("0*) s
e s− ≈ −
n t!is section, we present a general approac! forappro&imating !ig!"order transfer function models wit!
lower"order models t!at !ave similar dynamic and steady"state
c!aracteristics.
n /$. "4 we s!owed t!at t!e transfer function for a time
delay can be e&pressed as a Taylor series e&pansion. For small
values of s,
C h a p t e r 6
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
11/19
B %n alternative first"order appro&imation consists of t!e transfer
function,
'
'
1 1("0)
1'
s
se
se
− = ≈+
w!ere t!e time constant !as a value of
B /$uations "0* and "0 were derived to appro&imate time"
delay terms.
B Cowever, t!ese e&pressions can also be used to appro&imate
t!e pole or ero term on t!e rig!t"!and side of t!e e$uation by
t!e time"delay term on t!e left side.
' .
C h a p t e r 6
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
12/19
S"ogestad#s $half rule%
B #5ogestad (22) !as proposed a related appro&imation met!od
for !ig!er"order models t!at contain multiple time constants.
B Ce appro&imates t!e largest neglected time constant in t!e
following manner.
B ne !alf of its value is added to t!e e&isting time delay (if any)and t!e ot!er !alf is added to t!e smallest retained time
constant.
B Time constants t!at are smaller t!an t!e largest neglected time
constant- are appro&imated as time delays using ("0).
C h a p t e r 6
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
13/19
Example 6.4
onsider a transfer function:
( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )
.1 1("0A)
0 1 3 1 .0 1
$ s% s
s s s− +=
+ + +
Derive an appro&imate first"order"plus"time"delay model,
( )'
(")E 1
s $e% s
s
−
=+
%
using two met!ods:
(a) T!e Taylor series e&pansions of /$s. "0* and "0.
(b) #5ogestads !alf rule
C h a p t e r 6
ompare t!e normalied responses of %( s) and t!e appro&imate
models for a unit step input.
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
14/19
Solution
(a) T!e dominant time constant (0) is retained. %pplying
t!e appro&imations in ("0*) and ("0) gives:
.1.1 1 ("1) s s e−− + ≈
and
3 .01 1 ("2)3 1 .0 1
s se e s s
− −≈ ≈+ +
#ubstitution into ("0A) gives t!e Taylor series
appro&imation, ( ) :TS
% s%
( ).1 3 .0 3.
("3)0 1 0 1
s s s s
TS
$e e e $e% s
s s
− − − −
= =+ +
%
C h a p t e r 6
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
15/19
(b) To use #5ogestads met!od, we note t!at t!e largest neglected
time constant in ("0A) !as a value of t!ree.
' 1.0 .1 .0 2.1= + + =
C h a p t e r 6
B %ccording to !is !alf rule-, !alf of t!is value is added to t!e
ne&t largest time constant to generate a new time constant
B T!e ot!er !alf provides a new time delay of .0(3) 6 1.0.B T!e appro&imation of t!e 9C ero in ("1) provides an
additional time delay of .1.B %ppro&imating t!e smallest time constant of .0 in ("0A) by
("0) produces an additional time delay of .0.B T!us t!e total time delay in (") is,
E 0 .0(3) .0.= + =
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
16/19
and %&s' can be appro&imated as:
( )2.1
("4).0 1
s
S(
$e% s
s
−
=+
%
T!e normalied step responses for %&s' and t!e two appro&imate
models are s!own in Fig. .1. #5ogestads met!od provides
better agreement wit! t!e actual response.
C h a p t e r 6
Figure .1
omparison of t!e
actual and
appro&imate modelsfor /&le .4.
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
17/19
Example 6.5
onsider t!e following transfer function:
( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 ("0)12 1 3 1 .2 1 .0 1
s
$ s e% s s s s s
−−= + + + +
Gse #5ogestads met!od to derive two appro&imate models:
(a) % first"order"plus"time"delay model in t!e form of (")
(b) % second"order"plus"time"delay model in t!e form:
( ) ( ) ( )
'
1 2 (")E 1 E 1
s $e
% s s s
−
=+ +
%
ompare t!e normalied output responses for %&s' and t!e
appro&imate models to a unit step input.
C h a p t e r 6
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
18/19
Solution
(a) For t!e first"order"plus"time"delay model, t!e dominant time
constant (12) is retained.
3.' 1 .2 .0 1 3.*02
3.E 12 13.0
2
= + + + + =
= + =
C h a p t e r 6
B ne"!alf of t!e largest neglected time constant (3) is allocated
to t!e retained time constant and one"!alf to t!e appro&imate
time delay.
B %lso, t!e small time constants (.2 and .0) and t!e ero (1)are added to t!e original time delay.
B T!us t!e model parameters in (") are:
8/17/2019 files-2-Lectures_Lec18.ppt
19/19
(b) %n analogous derivation for t!e second"order"plus"time"delay
model gives:
1 2
.2' 1 .0 1 2.10
2
E 12, E 3 .1 3.1
= + + + =
= = + =
n t!is case, t!e !alf rule is applied to t!e t!ird largest time
constant (.2). T!e normalied step responses of t!e original and
appro&imate transfer functions are s!own in Fig. .11. C h a p t e r 6