53
FIELD PHONETICS Phonetic Documentation

Field phonetics

  • Upload
    delano

  • View
    39

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Phonetic Documentation. Field phonetics. Phonetic Documentation. Describe the inventory of a language in a phonetically accurate way. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Field phonetics

FIELD PHONETICSPhonetic Documentation

Page 2: Field phonetics

Phonetic Documentation

• Describe the inventory of a language in a phonetically accurate way.

• If the phonetic description is not accurate, it is difficult to compare to other languages (typologically, historically, synchronically), and to have the phonological patterns make sense.

• To make an orthography that “sounds like the language when you read it out”

Page 3: Field phonetics

Why phonetic fieldwork?

• Transcriptions are influenced by the native language of the fieldworker (Strange 1995).

Page 4: Field phonetics

Discovering Place of Articulation of consonants

InField 2010University of OregonDr. Amanda L. Miller

Page 5: Field phonetics

Place of Articulation

• Articulatory Photography:– Palatography / Linguography– Lip photography (still or video)

• Acoustics of Stops:• Locus Equations (F2 Onset, F2 Mid)• Voice Onset TimeAcoustics of Fricatives:• Spectral moments• Spectral peaks

Page 6: Field phonetics

Phonetic features

Page 7: Field phonetics

Palatography

• By doing palatography, you can discover the exact place of articulation of a consonant, by seeing where black mixture on the tongue makes contact with the palate.

Page 8: Field phonetics

Places of Articulation

Page 9: Field phonetics

Palatography/ Linguography

• Materials needed:– Dental mirror(s) – different sizes for different sized

mouths, fog-proof mirror is quite helpful– Child’s paintbrushes or q-tips– Activated Charcoal (can substitute with jello

mixture)– Olive oil (can substitute with other types of oil if

olive oil is not available)– Dish soap to clean dental mirror between each

production, and sink or plastic tub / dishpan to wash mirror

Page 10: Field phonetics

Palatography / Linguography

• Materials needed (continued)– Mixing bowl (disposable, as it is hard to remove

charcoal mixture, a fresh one for each consultant)– Dish towel or apron to drape over consultant’s

clothes to prevent from dirtying them– Lemonade or other citrus fruit for subjects to

drink / eat to remove charcoal mixture, and fresh glass for each consultant (Fresh pineapple works wonders!, fresh oranges are not so good)

Page 11: Field phonetics

Palatography / Linguography

Materials needed (continued)– Digital camera, able to set to take good pictures in

dark settings– Flashlight may be used to light up inside of mouth

if camera cannot be adjusted for dark spaces– Plastic table cloth to avoid getting charcoal

powder everywhere– Digital recorder to capture audio of the

productions– Notebook to keep record of picture number /

sound file number for each word

Page 12: Field phonetics

Palatography / Linguography

Other tips:• You can have the consultants paint their own

tongue with a mirror, especially if there is sensitivity to having an unknown person , or person of different sex inside of someone’s mouth

• It is best to do palatography / linguography outside, so that consultants can spit out charcoal mixture freely (alternatively you can be near a sink / tub, but this gets kind of gross).

Page 13: Field phonetics

Palatography

• Take a photo of the palate first without any charcoal mixture, so that you have a record of any dark spots on the teeth, etc.

Page 14: Field phonetics

Palatography

• Develop a wordlist – [a] vowel context on both sides is best because the tongue

doesn’t approach the palate– bisyllabic words with the target consonant intervocalic, or

bisyllabic with initial consonant– No other consonants, unless they are labial– Try to use real words. If the language has long words, you

can ask the consultant to produce only the first syllable of a longer word.

– Use minimal sets wherever possible – Keep prosodic positions the same (tone probably won’t

effect articulation, though stress might).

Page 15: Field phonetics

Palatography

• Mix the activated charcoal and olive oil• If mixture is correct texture, it will cover the

tongue well, and not slide off (except for some consultants who salivate a lot)

• Paint the tongue with the mixture using a child’s paintbrush (Ladefoged 200X ) or q-tip – make sure it covers the tongue completely, nice and dark with no pink spots showing.

• Paint as far back on the tongue as you can without gagging your consultant

Page 16: Field phonetics

Palatography

• Have the consultant produce the syllable/word in question, slip the dental mirror in their mouth, and take a picture of the palate.

• Consultants can produce the word / syllable multiple times as long as they don’t speak other words or swallow or touch their palate with their tongue in between productions)

• Have the consultant rinse their mouth with a citrus drink to remove the charcoal mixture.

Page 17: Field phonetics

Palatography: A Recent Discovery

• Fieldwork on Grootfontein !Xung in Namibia

Page 18: Field phonetics

Claims for a retroflex click

• Doke (1926) was the first to document a retroflex click• described !Xung spoken in Grootfontein area as having a 5th

contrastive coronal click, the retroflex click• Snyman (1997) survey of !Xung lects

• also described !Xung spoken in Grootfontein area as having a 5th retroflex click

• König and Heine (2001) describe Ekoka !Xung as having four contrastive clicks: dental, alveolar, lateral, and retroflex (no palatal click)

• admit that they do not know what the fourth click is phonetically

18

Page 19: Field phonetics

Claims against a retroflex click

• Currently, the IPA recognizes only 4 coronal clicks: dental, alveolar, lateral, and palatal

• no petition has ever been made to include the retroflex click in the IPA• Heikenen (1986) described the !Xung spoken in the Ekoka area as having a

palatal, rather than retroflex, click• In Sounds of the World’s Languages (1996) Ladefoged and Maddieson state

they do not believe a retroflex click to exist, based on the lack of evidence

19

Dental Alveolar Lateral alveolar

palatal

| ! || ǂc q x qc

Page 20: Field phonetics

!Xung is spoken in Namibia and Angola

20

Page 21: Field phonetics

Map!Xung Lects

König and Heine (2001) 21

Page 22: Field phonetics

Phonemic Inventory: Ingressive Consonants

Doke (1926)

22

/Palatal

Page 23: Field phonetics

Grootfontein !Xung alveolar vs retroflex:palatography

23

g!!u ‘water’speaker KU

g!u ‘belly’speaker KU

Page 24: Field phonetics

Linguography

• Linguography is when you paint the palate with the same charcoal / olive oil mixture, have the consultant produce a one syllable Ca word or bisyllabic aCa word, and see where the mixture rubs off on the tongue.

Page 25: Field phonetics

Linguography

• Linguography tells you whether a sound is apical (produced with the tip of the tongue), laminal (produced with the blade of the tongue), dorsal (produced with the tongue dorsum) or subapical (produced with the underside of the tongue touching the palate).

Page 26: Field phonetics

Parts of the tongue

Page 27: Field phonetics

Linguography: A Recent Discovery

• Fieldwork in Grootfontein and Ekoka, Namibia

Page 28: Field phonetics

Grootfontein !Xung alveolar vs retroflex:linguography

28

g!!u ‘water’speaker KU

g!u ‘belly’speaker KU

Page 29: Field phonetics

Ekoka reported retroflex vs Grootfontein palatal

29

Grootfontein gǂa ‘to be old’speaker XT

Ekokag!!a ‘to be old’speaker DX

Page 30: Field phonetics

Lip photography

• Tells you the degree of constriction• Provides information about the type of labial

constriction: bilabial, labio-dental, linguo-labial

• Provides information about the gestural type involving the lips: protruded, or compressed

Page 31: Field phonetics

Lip photography

• It is good to get photographs from two angles (straight on, and from the side).

• This can be done with one camera and a mirror, to get both images from the same production.

• You can take still photographs (timing can be tricky), 30 fps video, high frame rate video

Page 32: Field phonetics

Lip photography / video

Page 33: Field phonetics

Acoustics of Stops: Place of articulation

• You can also use acoustics to determine place of articulation of stops.

• Acoustics is easier to collect, non-invasive, but you need multiple repetitions, and it takes longer to analyze.

• Locus Equations can be used to determine place of articulation, and to uncover language specific C-V coarticulation patterns (Everett 2008).

Page 34: Field phonetics

General tips for Acoustic Recordings

• Head mounted microphones are quite good, because they keep the mike in the correct position (to the side of the mouth to avoid puffs of air), and keep it locked in the same position throughout the recording session (Shure SM10A with preamp like the USBPre, or Plantronics microphones).

• You need a microphone with a good frequency response (80 Hz to 11,000 Hz).

• Avoid background noise (use windscreen, away from other people, village)

• Be sure to put an audio marking of what the recording is – the speaker’s name, location of recording, language, etc.

• 22050 Hz sampling rate is sufficient (there is nothing measurable above 11,025 Hz)

Page 35: Field phonetics

General tips for acoustic recordings

• Record the whole wordlist, then repeat the whole thing (this way if the voice changes it changes for the whole list – not for some words on the list).

• You need at least 10 repetitions of each consonant in each context to do statistics, and 15 gives you some room for recordings that aren’t usable – clipped, etc.

• You can five repetitions of 3 words, 3 reps of 5 words, or 15 reps of 1 word, as long as it’s consistent across the types.

Page 36: Field phonetics

General tips for acoustic recordings

• Label your recordings in Praat, and write a script to analyze the data (or find one on the web).

• You can record people for acoustics who may not be the best subjects for articulatory studies.

• Spread the work out among the consultants, so more people get to work.

Page 37: Field phonetics

Formant transitions in three synthetic stop consonant

continua• Produced with the

‘pattern playback’ synthesiser.

• The ‘steady-state’ F1 and F2 patterns determine the vowel.

• The formant transitions constitute context sensitive cues to place of articulation of the stop.

• Is there a common property that defines a given place of articulation in terms of formant transitions?

Page 38: Field phonetics

The ‘locus’ of a formant transition

• Figure shows steady state F2 for different vowels and their formant transitions for [d] (alveolar stop)

• The formant transitions point back to a common ‘locus’ at 1.8 kHz.

Page 39: Field phonetics

The ‘locus’ of a formant transition

• The ‘locus’ of F2:– 3 kHz for velars– 1.8 kHz for alveolars– .6-.8 kHz for labials.

• However, the locus is a somewhat idealized notion.

• Velar stops vary in place of articulation with different vowels.

Page 40: Field phonetics

Summary: cues to place of articulation in stop consonants.

• Spectral energy distribution in the noise burst and formant transitions are the main cues.

• Formant transitions are context-sensitive cues.• Context-sensitive cues require more complex

signal processing.• A need for specialized phonetic feature

detectors?

Page 41: Field phonetics

Locus Equations

• Record multiple repetitions of each stop in all vowel contexts.

• Locus equations are linear regressions based on F2 formant transitions from vowel onsets to vowel midpoints.

• The F2 value of the onset of a given vowel can be plotted on the y-axis, with the F2 value of the vowel’s midpoint plotted on the x-axis.

• Has been used to document C-V coarticulation patterns of consonants in Karitiana (Amazonian language, Everett 2008).

Page 42: Field phonetics

Locus Equations

Linear regression equations derived from a two dimensional plot

For any given consonant, the F2 onset for the consonant is plotted against the F2 target of the vowel on the x-axis (usually at the midpoint of the vowel).

Y = mx + c where m is the slope of the line, and c is a constant.

The linear behavior of locus equation data is best explained by the theory that the vowel gesture begins before the release of the consonant (Ohman 1966).

Page 43: Field phonetics

What do they tell us?

• Locus equation slopes correlate with the place of articulation of the consonant.

• The slope allows us to assess the degree of coarticulation between the vowel and the consonant.

• Different languages may also show differences in degree of coarticulation.

(see Beddor et al.2002)

Page 44: Field phonetics

Measuring Formants

Page 45: Field phonetics

F2 SCATTER PLOTS

Page 46: Field phonetics

Locus Equations: Kiritiana

Page 47: Field phonetics

Slope correlates with POA

Page 48: Field phonetics

POA: Cairene Arabic

Page 49: Field phonetics

Slope and Y-Intercept

Page 50: Field phonetics
Page 51: Field phonetics

Locus Equations: Cross-linguistic comparisons

Page 52: Field phonetics

References

Anderson, Victoria. (2008). Static Palatography for Language Fieldwork. Language Documentation and Conservation 2, 1, 1-27.

Everett, Caleb. (2008). Locus Equation Analysis as a Tool for Linguistic Fieldwork. Language Documentation and Conservation 2, 2, 185-211.

Ladefoged, Peter. (2003). Phonetic Data Analysis: An Introduction to Fieldwork and Instrumental Techniques. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Ladefoged, Peter. (2007). Articulatory features for describing lexical distinctions. Language 83 (1). 161-180.

Ladefoged, Peter and Maddieson, Ian. (1996). Sounds of the World’s Languages. Blackwell.

Page 53: Field phonetics

References

Ladefoged, Peter. (1957). “Use of Palatography”. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 22.5, 764-774.

OSU Complete Denture Clinic Manual.