FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Quality Manual …...This Quality Manual is developed for Faculty of Engineering’s Quality Management System in Teaching, Learning and Assessment. It is aimed

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING

Quality Manual

(Teaching and Learning Manual)

SECOND EDITION

QUALITY MANUAL (QM)-FE


i

Preface

The 2nd edition of Quality Manual (Teaching, Learning and Assessment) is to extend and

address new topics that are relevant to the progress and maturation in higher education.

Primarily, this Quality Manual is designed to meet the needs of Quality Management System

(QMS) for the Faculty of Engineering academic staff. The Quality Manual describes the scope,

terms and definitions, QMS, management responsibilities, resource management, product

realization and the process of measurement, analysis and improvement. The new areas that are

included in this second edition improvise and keep the character of this manual as useful

guidance for teaching and learning activities. This Quality Manual contains sufficient processes

and references that enable the academic staff to follow, without too much difficulty.

The authors would like to thank all academician of this Faculty for their time and support

throughout the production of the 2nd Edition and of cause not forgetting program coordinators,

head of units and top managements.

The Quality Management Committee (QMC) of Faculty of Engineering hope that the academic

staffs will now be able to continue the activities in Teaching, Learning and Assessment

activities with limited guide. Academic staffs are encouraged to adhere to the procedure in the

Quality Manual which contain the best practice that Faculty of Engineering can apply.



ii

CONTENTS PAGE

List of Figures x

Committee Representation vi

About the Manual vii

Overview of Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak(UNIMAS) ix

Definition x

Abbreviation xiv

1 Scope 1

1.1 General 1

1.2 Application 1

2 Normative References 2

3 Terms and Definitions 3

4 Context of the organisation 4

4.1 Understanding the organization and its context

4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties

4.3 Determining the scope of the quality management system

4.4 Quality management system and its processes



iii

5 Leadership 9

5.1 Leadership and commitment

5.2 Policy

5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities

6 Planning 12

6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities

6.2 Quality objectives and planning to achieve them

6.3 Planning of changes

7 Support 14

7.1 Resources

7.2 Competence

7.3 Awareness

7.4 Communication

7.5 Documented information

8 Operation 19

8.1 Operational planning and control

8.2 Requirements for products and services

8.3 Design and development of products and services

8.4 Control of externally provided processes, products and services

8.5 Production and service provision

8.6 Release of products and services



iv

8.7 Control of nonconforming outputs.

9 Performance Evaluation 26

9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation

9.2 Internal Audit

9.3 Management Review

10 Improvement 29

10.1 General

10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action

10.3 Continual Improvement



v

List of Figure

Figure 1 Quality Management System structure

Figure 2 Operation process based on Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle

SECTION A: Teaching and Learning Checklist

a. Course File CT (QM) – FE – 01 A1

b. Lecture & Tutorial CT (QM) – FE – 02 A2

c. Cooperative Learning CT (QM) – FE – 03 A3

d. Site/Industrial Visit CT (QM) – FE – 04 A4

e. Project CT (QM) – FE – 05 A5

f. Laboratory CT (QM) – FE – 06 A6

g. Problem Based Learning CT (QM) – FE – 07 A7

h. Final Year Project (FYP 1) CT (QM) – FE – 08 A8

i. Final Year Project (FYP 2) CT (QM) – FE – 09 A9

j. Industrial Training (LI) CT (QM) – FE – 10 A10

k. Integrated Design Project(IDP) CT (QM) – FE – 11 A11

SECTION B: Appointment Checklist

a. IAP CA (QM) – FE – 01 B1

b. Adjunct Professor CA (QM) – FE – 02 B2

c. International Advisor CA (QM) – FE – 03 B3

d. External Examiner (Local/International) CA (QM) – FE – 04 B4

e. Invited Lecturer/Speaker & Flying Lecturer CA (QM) – FE – 05 B5

f. Board of Studies CA (QM) – FE – 06 B5

SECTION C: Teaching Process Procedure

a. Teaching Appointment Letter PP (QM) – FE – 01 C1

b. Teaching-Learning with Lecture & Tutorial PP (QM) – FE – 02 C2

c. Teaching-Learning with Cooperative

Learning

PP (QM) – FE – 03 C3



vi

d. Teaching-Learning with Site/Industrial

Visit

PP (QM) – FE – 04 C4

e. Teaching-Learning with Project PP (QM) – FE – 05 C5

f. Teaching-Learning based on Laboratory PP (QM) – FE – 06 C6

g. Teaching-Learning based on PBL PP (QM) – FE – 07 C7

h. Teaching-Learning based on FYP PP (QM) – FE – 08 C8

i. Teaching-Learning based on LI PP (QM) – FE – 09 C9

j. Teaching-Learning based on IDP PP (QM) – FE – 10 C10

k. Teaching-Learning with Invited

Lecturer/Speaker & Part Time Lecturer

PP (QM) – FE – 11 C11

l. Teaching-Learning with Complex Problem

Solving (CPS) or Complex Engineering

Activities

PP (QM) – FE – 12 C12

SECTION D: Supporting Process Procedure

a. Document Control PP (QM)(S) – FE – 01 D1

b. Record Control PP (QM)(S) – FE – 02 D2

c. Internal Audit PP (QM)(S) – FE – 03 D3

d. Nonconformity Product Control PP (QM)(S) – FE – 04 D4

e. Preventive Action PP (QM)(S) – FE – 05 D5

f. Corrective Action PP (QM)(S) – FE – 06 D6

g. Staff Development Training PP (QM)(S) – FE – 07 D7

h. Customer Feedback PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08 D8

i. Student Final Exam Answer Script Disposal PP (QM)(S) – FE – 09 D9

j. Condition of Passing a Course PP (QM)(S) – FE – 10 D10

k. Exit Interview PP (QM)(S) – FE – 11 D11

l. Culminating Courses PP (QM)(S) – FE – 12 D12

m. Product Continuous Quality Improvement

(CQI)

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13 D13



vii

SECTION E: Attachments (Teaching and Learning)

a. Case Study Report CT (QM) – FE – 03D(i) E1

b. Team Work Evaluation CT (QM) – FE – 03D(ii) E2

c. Oral Presentation CT (QM) – FE – 03D(iii) E3

d. Log Book Site Visit CT (QM) – FE – 04D(i) E4

e. Laboratory Report Writing CT (QM) – FE – 06D(i) E5

f. Conduct Experiment/Laboratory Work CT (QM) – FE – 06D(ii) E6

g. PBL Rubric CT (QM) – FE – 07D(ii) E7

h. Final Year Project 1 (Supervisor)

Final Year Project 1 (Examiner)

CT (QM) – FE – 08D(i) (R1)

CT (QM) – FE – 08D(i-E)

E8

i. Final Year Project 2 (Supervisor) CT (QM) – FE – 08D(ii)(R1)

E9

j. Final Year Project 2 (Examiner) CT (QM) – FE – 08D(iii)(R1)

E10

k. Industrial Training Report and Logbook CT (QM) – FE – 09D(iii) E11

l. Engineering Drawing CT (QM) – FE – D(i) E12

m. Laboratory Report Open Ended (Civil

Engineering)

OR

Laboratory Report Partially Open Ended

(Civil Engineering)

CT (QM) – FE – S(i) E13

n. Integrated Design Project 1 (Civil)

(Preliminary Design Report Evaluation)

CT(QM) – FE – S(iii) E14

o. Integrated Design Project 1

Weekly Assessment/Log Book CT(QM) – FE – S(iv)

E15

p. Integrated Design Project 1

Conceptual Report Evaluation CT(QM) – FE – S(vii)

E16

q. Laboratory Report Fully/ Partially Open-

Ended Rubric (Mechanical and

Manufacturing Engineering)

OR

Workshop

CT(QM) – FE – M(i) E17

r. Integrated Design Project Final Report

Evaluation

(Mechanical and Manufacturing

Engineering)

CT(QM) – FE – M(ii) E18



viii

s. Integrated Design Project

Oral and Model Presentation Rubric

(Mechanical and Manufacturing

Engineering)

CT(QM) – FE – M(iii) E19

t. Psychomotor Rubric

Chemical Engineering Laboratory I CT(QM) – FE – K(i)

E20

u. Psychomotor Rubric (Chemical)

Laboratory/ Workshop Work

CT(QM) – FE – K(viii) E21

v. Laboratory (Chemical Engineering)

Guided Laboratory

CT(QM) – FE – K(ix) E22

w. Laboratory (Chemical Engineering)

Open-Ended Laboratory

CT(QM) – FE – K(x) E23

x. Engineering Drawing Instructor’s Rubric

(Chemical Engineering)

CT(QM) – FE – K(xi) E24

y. Peer Evaluation (Ranking) CT(QM) – FE – 02B(i)

E25

z. Project Report CT (QM) – FE – 02B(ii)

E26

aa. Psychomotor Rubric CT (QM) – FE – 02B(iii)

E27

bb. Affective Rubric CT (QM) – FE – 02B(iv)

E28

cc. Lifelong Learning Skills CT (QM) – FE – 02B(v)

E29

dd. Project or Assignment Rubric Template CT (QM) – FE – 02B(vi)

E30



ix

SECTION E: Attachments ( Support Procedure)

a. Bloom’s Taxonomy of Assessment PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13M(i)

E30

b. Complex Engineering Problem Moderation

Form

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13M(ii) E31

c. Final Exam Moderation Form PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13M(iii)

E32

d. Test Moderation Form PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13M(iv)

E33

e. Course Evaluation Form PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13M(v)

E34

e. Alumni Survey Form (Alumni Tracer Study) PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(i) E35

f. Employer Survey Form PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(ii) E36

g. Exit Survey From PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(iii) E37

h. Industrial Training Survey Form PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(iv) E38

i Preliminary report from External Examiner PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(v)

E39

j Preliminary report from Industrial Advisory

Panel

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(vi) E40

i Industrial Training Supervisor Report PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(vii)

E41

j Industrial Training Supervisor Monitoring

Report

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(viii) E42



x

The Authors

The authors for Faculty of Engineering Quality Manual are:

Assoc Prof Dr Siti Noor Linda Binti Taib

Assoc Prof Dr Abdullah Bin Yassin

Dr Annisa Binti Jamali

Kasumawati Binti Lias

Dr Idawati Binti Ismail

Dr Siti Kudnie Binti Sahari

Dr Ade Syaheda Wani Binti Marzuki

Dr Nur Tahirah Binti Razali

Dr Noor Hisyam Bin Noor Mohamed

Norazlina Binti Bateni

Dr Abdul Rahman Bin Kram

Dr Hafizah Binti Abdul Halim Yun



xi

About this manual

This Quality Manual is developed for Faculty of Engineering’s Quality Management System

in Teaching, Learning and Assessment. It is aimed primarily at achieving customer satisfaction

by meeting the Engineering Accreditation Council’s requirements and industries’ needs

through application and continual improvement of the system. This Quality Management

System is developed based on quality principles such as leadership, customer focus, continual

improvement involvement of the employees and stakeholders, process focus and ultimately

decisions that are based on survey data, meetings or discussions among the stakeholders.

The Management Representative maintains this manual for the Quality Management System

and for Faculty of Engineering employees’ use especially the academic staff. Requests for

changes should be submitted to the Management Representative and updates of the manual are

issued as required. It is the responsibility of the Management Representative, Faculty Dean,

Deputy Dean and Head of Department to ensure that employees are familiar with the manual’s

content that relates to their work and responsibilities in particular. They will be kept informed

of any changes and updates.

This Quality Manual describes the Faculty of Engineering’s Quality Management System. The

purpose is for:

Internal use – to communicate to employees especially the academic staff on the faculty’s

quality policy and quality objectives, to facilitate the implementation of Quality

Management System and its continuity and required updates, to provide effective

communication and control of quality related activities and documents.

External use – to inform Faculty of Engineering stakeholders on the Faculty of

Engineering’s Quality Policy and Quality Objectives.

Faculty comply with MS ISO 9001:2015.



xii

Effective date of this Quality Manual: September, 2018

Approved by:

____________________________ ________________________________

Assoc. Prof Dr Abdullah Bin Yassin, Assoc Prof. Dr Siti Noor Linda Binti Taib,

Management Representative Dean, Faculty of Engineering

Date: Date:



xiii

Overview of Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

The Faculty of Engineering, formed on 30th December 1993, is one of eight faculties in

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS). The faculty started off with only two engineering

programmes, Civil Engineering and Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering with the

first intake in July 1994. The Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing System Programme

and the Electronics and Computer Engineering Programme were introduced in 1996 and May

2000 respectively. In early 2009, the Chemical Engineering Programme was introduced in

order to fulfil the growing needs and opportunities in the world of engineering. Currently,

there is an intake of approximately 2000 students in the Engineering Faculty. The faculty’s

core business is teaching & learning; providing knowledge to customer in order to prepare them

for the engineering profession.

The Faculty of Engineering provides comfortable lecture environment, various engineering

laboratory tools and experienced academic staff. The curriculum prepared by the Faculty of

Engineering meets the requirement of the industries.

Vision, Mission, Quality Policy and Objectives of Faculty of Engineering

VISION OF THE FACULTY

To be a leading faculty with accredited Engineering programs producing quality graduates, and

benefiting the community and nation through high impact research and exemplary leadership.

MISSION OF THE FACULTY

To provide a culture of continuous quality improvement through holistic curriculum and

strategic research involving stakeholder participation that is delivered by scholarly faculty

members who contribute towards knowledge creation.

QUALITY POLICY

Faculty of Engineering is committed to become the preferred faculty chosen by prospective

students and to produce excellent and quality graduates by providing outstanding teaching

services through the recruiting of quality and qualified lecturers.



xiv

QUALITY OBJECTIVES

Ensure that the implementation of teaching plan is 100% achieved.

Ensure adequate resources to facilitate the implementation of teaching, learning and

assessment activities.

Ensure sufficient and qualified lecturers.

Ensure that customer satisfaction is 100% achieved.



xv

Definition

“Amendment” is a minor amendment that is less than 50% for any work process in a

document.

“Corrective action” is action to eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity or other

undesirable situation.

“Course” is a subject that offers by any programme and it has a specific code.

“Course Registration” is a process where the student registers certain courses in certain

program within the given period.

“Customer satisfaction” is customer’s perception of the degree to which the customers’

requirements have been fulfilled.

“Continual improvement” is recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements.

“Customer” is organization or person that receives a product or services.

“Conformity” is fulfilment of a requirement.

“Corrective Maintenance” is maintenance that implemented to repair damage equipment to

be in better condition.

“Dean” is a head of a Faculty appointed by the Vice Chancellor.

“Defect” is non-fulfilment of a requirement related to an intended or specified use.

“Design and development” is set of processes that transform requirements into specified

characteristics or into the specification of a product, process, or system.

“Document Officer” is a person who will be responsible in managing and controlling the

documents that are used in the Faculty of Engineering Quality Management System.

“Evaluation” is a mechanism to measure student’s academic achievement.

“External Document” is official documents published by the government agency used as a

reference or guide for the Faculty of Engineering Quality Management System.



xvi

“External Training Programme” is a training/course/seminar/workshop organized by

Faculty of Engineering or co-organized with external agencies and conducted outside of

Faculty of Engineering.

“External Agency Training” is a training/course/seminar/workshop organized by external

organizer such as other or private training agency. Nomination put forward to the related

agency by the Head of Department based on the training needs that have been identified by the

Head of Department.

“Faculty” is an academic entity that offers programme at University including any centres or

university institutes that offers academic programme.

“Faculty Academic Committee” is a committee chaired by the Dean which constitute of

Deputy Dean, Head of Department, Programme Coordinator, Lecturer and Assistant Registrar

as a Secretary. This committee will discuss the issues that related to the faculty academic affair.

“Faculty Examination Committee” is a committee chaired by the Dean which constitutes of

Deputy Dean, Head of Department, Programme Coordinator, Lecturer and Assistant Registrar

as a Secretary to verify the student results, make amendment on the results if necessary and

decide which student that are qualified to graduate.

“Head of Department” is an academician appointed by Vice Chancellor to lead a department

in a faculty.

“Internal Document” is documents created for the implementation purpose of Faculty of

Engineering Quality Management System.

“Internal Training Programme” is a training/course/seminar/workshop organized by Faculty

of Engineering or co-organized with external agencies and conducted in the Faculty of

Engineering premise.

“Lecture” is a learning class in any course.



xvii

“Management” is a coordinated activity to direct and control an organization.

“Management system” is a system to establish policy and objectives and to achieve those

objectives.

“Non-conformity” is non-fulfilment of a requirement.

“Organizational structure” is an arrangement of responsibilities, authorities and relationships

between people.

“Preventive action” is an action to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity or other

undesirable potential situation.

“Process” is a set of interrelated or interacting activities which transforms inputs into outputs.

“Product” is the result of a process.

“Procedure” is a specified way to carry out an activity or a process.

“Preventive Maintenance” is a scheduled maintenance

“Quality” is a degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfils the set requirements.

“Quality documents” are documents which form the quality system.

“Quality Policy” is the overall intentions and direction of an organization related to quality as

formally expressed by top management.

“Quality Objectives” is something sought or aimed for, related to quality.

“Quality management” is a coordinated activities to direct and control an organization with

regard to quality.

“Quality Planning” is part of quality management focused on setting quality objectives and

specifying necessary operational processes and related resources to fulfil the quality objectives.

“Quality control” is part of quality management focused on fulfilling quality requirements.

“Quality improvement” is part of quality management focused on increasing the ability to

fulfil quality requirements.



xviii

“Quality manual” is a document specifying the Quality Management System of an

organization.

“Quality plan” is a document specifying which procedure and associated resources shall be

applied by whom and when to a specific product or process.

“Requirement” is need or expectation that is stated, generally implied or obligatory.

“Record” is document stating results achieved or providing evidence of activities performed.

“Revision” is a major change that is more than 50% for any work process or exceeding eight

(8) times of changes in one process.

“Student” is someone who completed the student registration at the University.

“Semester” is a studying period (usually 17 weeks) determined by the Senate for teaching and

learning activities.

“System” is set of interrelated or interacting elements.

“Staff Development Programme” is a programme provided to the staff to enhance the skills,

knowledge as well as to form the staff attitude towards improving their competency in

performing their jobs.

“Top management” is a person or group of people who directs and controls an organization

at the highest level.

“University” is Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.

“Work environment” is set of conditions under which work is performed.



xix

Abbreviation

EAC - Engineering Accreditation Councils

FE - Faculty of Engineering

FYP - Final Year Project

FAC - Faculty Accreditation Committee

FQMU - Faculty Quality Management Unit

HOD - Head of Department

IDP - Integrated Design Project

LI - Industrial Training

MR - Management Representative

PBL - Problem Based Learning

QMC - Quality Management Committee

QMS - Quality Management System

SMP - Sistem Maklumat Pelajar



P a g e | 1 Revision 2.00

1 Scope

1.1 General

The QMS described hereinafter in accordance with all the requirements of MS ISO 9001:2015

focuses on enhancing customer satisfaction through continuous improvement of teaching,

learning and assessment processes by meeting the EAC requirements and industries needs; and

demonstrates compliance with customer and regulatory requirements.

1.2 Application

The scope and application of the QMS covers complete teaching, learning and assessment

processes. The FE QMS meets all requirements of MS ISO 9001:2015 except:

8.3 Design and development of product and services

8.5.6 Control of changes




2 Normative References

The content and application of the Quality Manual makes reference to the following

documents:

MS ISO 9001:2015, Quality Management System – requirements.

MS ISO 9000:2005, Quality Management System – fundamentals and vocabulary.

MS ISO 9004:2000, Quality Management System – guidelines for performance

improvements.

Peruntukan-Peruntukan Am UNIMAS.

Manual Jaminan Kualiti UNIMAS

Manual Prosedur Kerja UNIMAS




3 Terms and Definitions

Terms and definitions of Manual Jaminan Kualiti UNIMAS, Peruntukan-Peruntukan

AM UNIMAS and MS ISO 9000:2005 are applied in the Faculty’s Quality Manual.




4 Context of the organization

4.1 Understanding the organization and its context

FE establishes, documents, implements and maintains the QMS and continually improves its

effectiveness in line with the requirements of MS ISO 9001:2015. In order to achieve the

general requirements, FE needs to:

a) Determine teaching, learning and assessment activities which affect FE QMS.

b) Determine the sequence and interaction of teaching, learning and assessment activities

in a suitable manner.

c) Determine the methods needed to ensure teaching, learning and assessment activities

and their implementation controls are effective.

d) Implement actions necessary to achieve planned results.

e) Ensure the availability of human and material resources, as well as necessary

information to support teaching, learning and assessment activities.

f) Monitor and measure where applicable and analyze the achievement of planned

results.

g) Perform continual quality improvement of teaching, learning and assessment

activities.

These processes are managed by the Faculty of Engineering in accordance with the

requirements of MS ISO 9001:2015.

4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties

The top management of FE must ensure that customer requirements and expectations are being

identified, understood and fulfilled in line with the Quality Policy and Quality Objectives. To

ensure these requirements are achievable, several actions are taken:




a) Create awareness in fulfilling the customer’s needs and expectations to all FE staff

through websites, e-mails, memos or meetings that are sent out or held periodically.

b) Constant review of customer’s needs in order to fulfil their requirements within FE

jurisdiction and capacity.

c) Set up standards for teaching, learning and assessment control.

d) Customer feedback and complaints will be dealt with according to FE Quality Policy.

4.3 Determining the scope of the quality management system

The documentation of FE QMS includes:

a) Documented statements of a Quality Policy and Quality Objectives.

b) Quality Manual.

c) Process procedure.

d) Supporting process procedure.

e) Documents, including records determined by the faculty necessary to ensure effective

planning, implementation and control of the processes.

4.4 Quality management system and its processes

FE establishes and maintains QMS documentation to ensure customer satisfaction. The QMS

structure is summarized as follows:



P a g e | 6

Fig

ure

1:

Qual

ity M

anag

emen

t S

yst

em (

QM

S).



P a g e | 7

The QMS is established to ensure teaching, learning and assessment processes are implemented

effectively in accordance with requirements of MS ISO 9001:2015 as shown in Figure 1:

i. Quality Manual

The Quality Manual describes FE management commitment on handling the QMS in

teaching, learning and assessment processes. The Quality Manual refers to Quality

Procedures identified in FE QMS covering teaching, learning and assessment.

ii. Process Procedures

Process procedures describe FE QMS procedure in teaching, learning and assessment

activities that is currently in practical. The FE is responsible to prepare and implement

teaching, learning and assessment processes that are consistent with MS ISO 9001:2008

and EAC requirements. There are twelve (12) process procedures in teaching, learning

and assessment developed by FE:

a) Teaching Appointment Letter.

b) Teaching-Learning with Lecture & Tutorial approach.

c) Teaching-Learning with Cooperative Learning approach.

d) Teaching-Learning with Site/Industrial Visit approach.

e) Teaching-Learning with Project approach.

f) Teaching-Learning with Laboratory approach.

g) Teaching-Learning based on Problem Based Learning (PBL).

h) Teaching-Learning based on Final Year Project (FYP).

i) Teaching-Learning based on Industrial Training (LI).

j) Teaching-Learning based on Integrated Design Project (IDP).

k) Teaching-Learning with Lecture, Invited Lecture/Speaker.

l) Student Final Exam Answer Script Disposal

m) Customer Feedback.



P a g e | 8

iii. Supporting Process Procedures

Supporting process procedures describe FE QMS supporting processes that relates to

teaching, learning and assessment activities which ensure teaching, learning and

assessment process procedures are implemented effectively. FE has developed nine (9)

supporting process procedures:

a) Control of Documents.

b) Control of Records.

c) Internal Audit.

d) Control of Nonconformity Products.

e) Preventive Actions.

f) Corrective Actions.

g) Academic Staff Training.

h) Purchasing.

i) Maintenance.

iv. Supporting Documents

Supporting documents are internal and external documents used as reference that

supports implementation of FE QMS in teaching, learning and assessment activities.

v. Records

Evidences required by MS ISO 9001:2015.



P a g e | 9

5 Leadership

5.1 Leadership and Commitment

5.1.1 General

The top management of FE is committed to the development and commencement of QMS

based on MS ISO 9001:2015, while continuously improving the system in an effort to ensure

its effectiveness. In achieving these, several actions will be taken such as:

a) Ensure that all academic staff understand customer requirements.

b) Ensure that all academic staff understand the fundamental of FE Quality Policy.

c) Review QMS annually.

d) Ensure the availability of sufficient resources.

5.1.2 Customer Focus

The top management of FE must ensure that customer requirements and expectations are being

identified, understood and fulfilled in line with the Quality Policy and Quality Objectives. To

ensure these requirements are achievable, several actions are taken:

a) Create awareness in fulfilling the customer’s needs and expectations to all FE staff

through websites, e-mails, memos or meetings that are sent out or held periodically.

b) Constant review of customer’s needs in order to fulfil their requirements within FE

jurisdiction and capacity.

c) Set up standards for teaching, learning and assessment control.

d) Customer feedback and complaints will be dealt with according to FE Quality Policy.



P a g e | 10

5.2 Policy

5.2.1 Establishing the quality policy

FE has developed the Quality Policy as follows:

Faculty of Engineering is committed to become the preferred faculty chosen by

prospective students and to produce excellent and quality graduates by providing

outstanding teaching services through the recruitment of quality and qualified lecturers.

5.2.2 Communicating the quality policy

The top management of FE ensures that Quality Policy will be:

a) Understood by FE staff especially academic staff.

b) Reviewed periodically to ensure its effectiveness and appropriateness.

c) Controlled to ensure its effectiveness.

5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities

5.3.1 Responsibility and Authority

The top management of FE identify and disseminate the responsibility and authority of FE staff

through an updated Organization and Function chart. The FE Organization, the FE function

chart and the QMC committee organization are presented in Appendix (QM) A1, (QM) A2 and

(QM) A3, respectively.



P a g e | 11

5.3.2 Management Representative

Top management of FE appoints an MR who is responsible to:

a) Prepare, implement and maintain the QMS.

b) Report on the achievement of the QMS to the faculty’s top management.

c) Inform continuous quality improvement implementation to the faculty’s staff.

d) Synchronize the implementation of internal audit.

e) Communicate with internal and external stakeholders on FE QMS.

The MR will be assisted by the Faculty Quality Management Committee (QMC).



P a g e | 12

6 Planning

6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities

Top management of FE ensures:

a) The implementation of the QMS fulfils the requirements as stated in clause 4.1.

b) QMS is on track with FE strategic planning to ensure Quality Objectives are achieved.

c) QMS is prepared for FE to handle, process, implement and continuously improve

teaching, learning and assessment processes through strategic partnership with related

local and international industries, universities and institutions.

d) QMS is prepared for FE to fulfil customers’ needs and enhance future demand as

stated in clause 4.2.

e) QMS include the preparation of Quality Manual, customer manual, process

procedure, supporting process procedure and related supporting documents and

records to ensure that the Quality Objectives are achieved.

f) FE staff understands and takes actions to ensure the Quality Objectives are achieved.

6.2 Quality objectives and planning to achieve them

FE provides Quality Objectives that are in line with the Quality Policy. The Quality

Objectives are stated as follows:

a) Ensure that the implementation of teaching plan is 100% achieved.

b) Ensure adequate resources to facilitate the implementation of teaching, learning and

assessment activities.

c) Ensure sufficient and qualified lecturers.

d) Ensure that customer satisfaction is 100% achieved.



P a g e | 13

6.3 Planning of changes

Top management of FE ensures all the resources have been cross checked if there is a need of

changes to the quality management system. MR shall consider;

a) the purpose of the changes and their potential consequences;

b) the integrity of the quality management system;

c) the availability of resources;

d) the allocation or reallocation of responsibilities and authorities



P a g e | 14

7 Support

7.1 Resources

7.1.1 General

Top management of FE ensures approved resources identified by FE during faculty meetings,

strategic planning and curriculum review are available in a timely manner. The resources

include teaching and learning facilities. Resources at faculty level are monitored by FE Dean

with the assistance of FE top management. The expenses are included in the FE Annual

Financial Budget. FE determines and provides the resources needed in order to:

a) Implement and maintain FE QMS and continually improve its effectiveness.

b) Enhance customer satisfaction by meeting their requirements.

7.1.2. People

FE Dean is responsible to identify qualification requirements of personnel assigned in teaching

and assessment activities that affect the quality of products and services which in turn will

reflect customer satisfaction. The qualification requirements include education, training, skills

and related experience.

7.1.3 Infrastructure

The top management of FE determines, provides and maintains the infrastructure needed to

achieve conformity to services requirements. The infrastructure includes:

a) Office building, lecture rooms, lecture halls, tutorial rooms, laboratories, toilets,

seminar rooms, resource centre and meeting rooms.

b) Teaching helpdesk equipment and required software.

c) Supporting services and facilities such as electricity, lift, communication and

information technology system.



P a g e | 15

In order to ensure the infrastructure are in good condition, planned maintenance work are

carried out.

7.1.4 Environment for the operation of processes

FE is responsible to provide a comfortable and conducive working, teaching and learning

environment to the FE staff and customer respectively, towards achieving the conformity to

service requirements. A few steps are taken into consideration in order to ensure comfortable

and conducive work environment:

a) Comply with regulations that ensure health and safety.

b) Provide facilities that create conducive working, teaching and learning environment.

7.1.5 Monitoring and measuring resources

FE determines and provides the resources needed to ensure valid and reliable results of products

and services. Management representative (MR) ensures the resources provided are in placed

and maintained through continuous monitoring from Self Assesment Report (SRR). FE retains

appropriate documented information as evidence of suitability for purpose of the monitoring

and measurement resources.

7.1.6 Organizational Knowledge

The top management of FE determines the knowledge necessary to achieve conformity of

products and services. FE considers any necessary additional knowledge and required updates

when addressing changing needs and trends. This can be attained by;

a) internal sources (intellectual property; the results of improvements in processes,

products and services);

b) external sources (standards; academia; conferences; gathering knowledge from

customers or external providers).



P a g e | 16

7.2 Competence

FE management will:

a) Ensure FE staff are qualified and competent.

b) Ensure FE staff are provided with training, workshops and seminar series based on

their requirements.

c) Evaluate FE staff performances annually through ‘Penilaian Prestasi Tahunan’

evaluation.

d) Ensure FE staff are aware of the importance of their contribution in teaching, learning

and assessment activities in order for FE to achieve stated quality objectives.

e) Ensure appropriate records of education, training, skills and experiences are

maintained properly.

7.3 Awareness

MR ensure that FE staff are aware of:

a) the quality policy;

b) relevant quality objectives;

c) their contribution to the effectiveness of the quality management system, including

the benefits of improved performance;

d) the implications of not conforming with the quality management system

requirements

7.4 Communication

The top management of FE ensures the establishment of internal communication system in

order to disseminate information to faculty staff in actively manner. Internal communications

currently in use are:



P a g e | 17

a) Internal websites.

b) E-mails.

c) News and events.

d) Department and faculty meetings.

e) Notice boards.

f) Internal memo circulations.

g) Activities held periodically.

7.5 Documented Information

7.5.1 General

The Quality Manual is the main document in the FE QMS. This document is prepared to fulfil

the following requirements:

a) Scope of QMS which covers teaching, learning and assessment processes in FE.

b) Quality Policy and Quality Objectives of FE.

c) Exclusion application of clauses 8.3, 8.5.6, 8.6 and 8.7 in MS ISO 9001:2015.

7.5.2 Creating and updating

FE controls the documents required by the QMS. It is the responsibility of the Management

Representative (MR) to ensure the availability of the QMS corporate documents and

documents required by MS ISO 9001:2015. It is also the MR responsibility to ensure the

Quality Manual is updated. The controlled documents are:

a) Quality Manual.

b) Process Procedure.

c) Supporting Process Procedure.



P a g e | 18

d) Supporting document required by MS ISO 9001:2015 related to teaching, learning

and assessment processes.

e) Teaching, learning and assessment materials.

f) Customer’s manual.

g) Teaching, learning and assessment control checklist.

h) Industrial Advisory Panel, Adjunct Professor, External Examiner and International

Academic Advisor appointment control checklist.

7.5.3 Control of documented information

FE controls documented information that provide evidence of requirement conformity and

effective implementation of the QMS. It is the MR responsibility to ensure availability of

documented information that are necessary for the effectiveness of the QMS. The documented

information are:

a) Record of education, training, skills and experience.

b) Record of evidences consists of realization processes and resulting product.

c) Record of product requirements review.

d) Record of the audits and their results.

e) Record of monitoring and measurement of product.

f) Record of the nature of nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken,

including concessions obtained.

g) Record of corrective actions taken.

h) Record of preventive actions taken.



P a g e | 19

8 Operation

8.1 Operational planning and control

FE plans, implements and controls the processes based on Clause 4.4. Planning of product

realization (Clause 6) shall be consistent with requirements of FE Quality Policy and Quality

Objectives.

FE determines process approach in order to prepare teaching, learning and assessment as

follow:

a) Quality Objectives and requirements for development of the product.

b) The need to establish processes and documents, and to provide resources specific to

the product.

c) Required monitoring and measurement activities specific to the product.

d) Records needed to provide evidence of realization processes and end product that

meet requirements.

The operation process is summarized in Figure 2.



P a g e | 20

Figure 2: Operation process based on Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle.

Teaching, Learning and

Assessment Process Procedure

Clause 8

Operation

Quality Manual

Supporting process procedure



P a g e | 21

8.2 Requirements for products and services

8.2.1 Customer Communication

FE determines and implements effective arrangement for communicating with customer in

relation to:

a) Product information.

b) Feedback, including comments and complaints.

Dissemination of information is through:

a) FE student guidelines.

b) FE website.

c) Meeting that is conducted periodically.

d) Customer feedback form.

e) Postal service.

f) E-mails.

g) Telephone.

8.2.2 Determination of the requirements for product and services

FE determines customer requirements related to teaching, learning and assessment activities

which includes:

a) Course plan.

b) Teaching delivery and learning activities.

c) Course review through customer feedback.

d) Monitoring and measuring customer satisfaction.

e) Fulfilling the EAC requirements.



P a g e | 22

8.2.3 Review of the requirements for Product and services

FE reviews requirements related to the product. This review will be conducted in line with the

faculty’s commitment to deliver products or services to the customer and ensure that:

a) Product requirements are defined.

b) Faculty has the ability to meet the defined requirements.

Records of the reviewed results and actions taken will be updated and documented.

When the product requirement is changed, the faculty will ensure that relevant documents are

amended, and the relevant personnel are made aware of the changes.

8.2.4 Changes to requirements for product and services

FE gathers feedbacks from all the stockholders. However, any changes of product and services

are bounded by Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC). Management Representative (MR)

ensures that relevant documented information is amended base on EAC requirements. FE staffs

are made aware of the changed requirements.

8.3 Design and Development of products and services

FE does not cover the clause 8.3 in the Quality Manual.

8.4 Control of externally provided processes, product and services

8.4.1 General

Purchase of facilities and services is in accordance with finance regulation stated by University

bursary through:



P a g e | 23

a) Open/Close Tender.

b) Quotation.

c) Direct Purchase.

8.4.2 Type and extent of control

Purchasing information describes the equipment to be purchased, including where appropriate:

a) Approval for the purchase of equipment.

b) Requirements for qualification of supplier.

c) Offered price and service payment.

8.4.3 Information for external providers

FK provides the information by;

a) Email

b) Advertisement board

8.5 Production and Service Provision

8.5.1 Control of Production and Service Provision

FE plans and carries out production and service provisions under controlled conditions.

Controlled conditions include, if applicable:

a) The availability of work instructions.

b) The use of suitable equipment’s and facilities.

c) Monitoring and measurement processes.

d) Product release and teaching delivery.



P a g e | 24

8.5.2 Identification and Traceability

Where appropriate, FE identifies the product by suitable means throughout product realization.

FE identifies product status with respect to monitoring and measurement requirements

throughout the product realization process.

When traceability is required, FE creates a unique identification of the product and its record.

8.5.3 Property belonging to customers or external provider

FE does not cover clause 8.5.3 in the Quality Manual.

8.5.4 Preservation

FE ensures that teaching, learning and assessment activity processes follows the required

identification, handling, storage and protection.

For instance, a product for teaching, learning and assessment material such as a course plan

must be stored in a secured place.

8.5.5 Post-Delivery activities

FE conducts post-delivery activities;

a) Within the activities

- Distribute the information regarding product

b) After the activities

- Verify the outcome

- Plan for CQI



P a g e | 25

8.5.6 Control of changes

Clause 8.5.6 is not applicable to FE QMS.

8.6 Release of product and services

FE ensures the product and service requirement have been met before being release to the

customer. FE disseminates the product through;

a) Website

b) During the activities

8.7 Control of nonconforming outputs.

FE ensures that outputs conform to their requirement. The appropriate action is taken to prevent

the nonconformity. FE deal with nonconforming outputs via:

a) correction;

b) obtaining authorization for acceptance under concession.

1. Conformity to the requirements shall be verified when nonconforming outputs are

corrected



P a g e | 26

9 Performance Evaluation

9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation

9.1.1 General

FE emphasizes on three main aspects to be monitored, analyzed and evaluated that is customer

satisfaction, processes and product.

9.1.2 Customer Satisfaction

FE monitors information related to customer perception as one of the performance

measurements of the QMS. Customer feedback is gathered through:

a) Customer satisfaction survey.

b) Suggestion box.

c) E-mail.

d) Counter.

e) Feedback through letter.

f) FENG Bulletin

Monitoring and measurement of customer satisfaction is based on customers feedback, survey

data, internal audit and management review process.

9.1.3 Analysis and evaluation

Teaching, learning and assessment activity processes are monitored in order to produce

graduates that fulfil the industrie’s requirement. Therefore, if the processes does not achieve

the expected outcome, corrective actions will be taken to improve the processes.

FE monitors and measures the product to ensure that it has met the stated Quality Objectives

and fulfils the requirements of the Engineering Accreditation Councils.



P a g e | 27

9.2 Internal audit

FE conducts internal audits annually. Internal Audit will ensure that:

a) The QMS is in line with the Quality Policy and Quality Objectives.

b) QMS is implemented and maintained effectively.

c) QMS complies with MS ISO 9001:2015 requirements.

d) Corrective actions from previous internal audit are taken.

Internal audits will be implemented as scheduled by trained internal auditors. Report of the

audit will be presented in the Faculty Management Committee meeting. The internal audit

coordinator will be assisted by an auditor who is appointed by the Vice Chancellor. Outcome

of the internal audit is recorded by the internal audit coordinator and will be checked by the

MR. Corrective actions would be taken to overcome identified weaknesses and to ensure the

effectiveness of FE QMS. The outcomes of an internal audit will be presented to FE top

management at the end of every academic session.

9.3 Management Review

9.3.1 General

The QMS is reviewed to assess the effectiveness of the system. This is done by means of

management meetings. These meetings are:

a) Curriculum Review Meeting.

b) Strategic Planning Committee Meeting.

c) Faculty Management Committee Meeting.

d) Faculty Meeting.



P a g e | 28

9.3.2 Management Review Input

The Quality Management review input includes:

a) Assessment and achievement of Quality Policy and Quality Objectives.

b) Findings of internal audit report.

c) Customer feedback.

d) Suggestions on change and improvement.

e) Reports on corrective action taken.

f) Status of preventive action.

g) Staff training requirements.

h) Other factors that affect the implementation of FE QMS in teaching, learning and

assessment activities such as financial factor.

9.3.2 Management Review Output

The results and decisions from the quality management review input contribute to the:

a) Improvement on the effectiveness of teaching, learning and assessment activities in

FE.

b) Improvement of FE academic staff competency level.

c) Adequate and suitable resources for execution processes.



P a g e | 29

10 Improvement

10.1 General

FE plans and implements improvement processes needed to demonstrate conformity of

product, QMS and its continual quality improvement. It is the responsibility of the MR to

develop and distribute determined methods that will be analyzed by FE Dean. Corrective

actions will be taken when appropriate to ensure continual quality improvement of the QMS.

10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action

FE identifies and controls nonconforming products in order to prevent unintended use or

delivery. The actions taken are as follows:

a) Take appropriate action to rectify the affected results from nonconforming products.

The nature of nonconformities and actions taken will be documented.

Preventive actions are taken in order to eliminate the occurrence of nonconformities.

Preventive actions are as follows:

a) Determine strategy and methods needed.

b) Appoint faculty staff to handle nonconforming product.

c) Review effectiveness of preventive actions taken.

d) Record results of actions taken.

FE will take appropriate action against effects of nonconformities. Corrective actions

implemented are as follows:

a) Management Review Processes.

b) Internal and External Audit.

c) Customer satisfaction.

d) Faculty, department or Faculty Management Committee meeting.



P a g e | 30

10.3 Continual improvement

FE continually improves the effectiveness of the QMS through:

a) Quality Policy

b) Quality Objectives

c) Internal Audit Result

d) Analysis of Data

e) Corrective Action

f) Preventive Action

g) Management Review

h) Customer Feedback

FE determines suitable data to be collected and analysed for continual improvement of the

QMS. Data that are analysed:

a) Customer satisfaction.

b) Conformity to product requirement.

c) Achievement of Quality Objectives.

d) Implementation of teaching, learning and assessment processes.



P a g e | 31

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING’S ORGANIZATIONAL CHART (QM) A1



P a g e | 32

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING’S FUNCTION CHART (QM) A2

Deputy Dean (Undergraduate)

Supervising and ensuring all quality, audit

and finance document is made

Ensuring the execution of QMS

Ensuring the related QMS information is

channelled to all staffs

Keeping in touch with internal/external

stakeholders regarding the quality

Reports the QMS performance to PJPA,

JPPA and Senate Meeting

Deputy Dean (Postgraduate

and Research)

Senior Assistant Registrar /

Assistant Registrar

Responsible for financial

managements

Responsible for providing the

teaching facility such as

classrooms or lecture halls,

teaching schedule and teaching

equipment and ensuring these

facilities runs smoothly.

Responsible for managing EUFE

(UPFK)

QMU Committee

The committee is responsible to

discuss and ensure the QMS

related processes runs smoothly

Accreditation Unit Committee

The committee is responsible to

ensure the Accreditation related

documents complete and related

processes run smoothly.

Dean

UPIK Committee

Responsible for ensuring the achievement and suitability of PEO

and PO is continuously measured and reviewed according to the

stakeholder as well as market needs.

Responsible for ensuring the implementation of OBE approach in

teaching and learning activities.

Responsible for the documentation

and management of all

documentation related to teaching, learning and assessment activities.

The documents under the

management of the OBE are the course files, course plans,

examination papers, assessment of student’s performance and other

documents related to delivery and

assessments.

FQMU Committee

Ensuring the FE’s QMS is abiding to

the EAC requirements

Lecturers

Executing the teaching, learning

and assessments processes.

Heads of Departments /

program Coordinator

Supervising the QMS (teaching,

learning and assessments)

execution at departmental level

Deputy Dean (Industry

Community Engagement

and Commercialization)

Deputy Dean

(Student Affairs and Alumni)



P a g e | 33

Deputy Dean (Undergraduate) Organizational Structure (QM) A3



P a g e | 34

Deputy Dean (Industrial, Community Engagement and Commercialization)

Organizational Structure (QM) A4

Dean

Deputy Dean

(Industry, Community Engagement

and Commercialization)

Industry and Community

Engagement Unit

Commercialization and Life

Long Learning (LLL) Unit

Industrial Training Unit



P a g e | 35

Deputy Dean (Postgraduate and Research) Organizational Structure (QM) A5

Deputy Dean

(Postgraduate and Research)

Dean

Data

Management

Unit

Website

Quality Unit

Workspace

Management

Unit

Strategic Plan Monitoring and

Resource Management Committee

Postgraduate

Application

Process Unit

Postgraduate

Programme

Quality Unit

Publication

Unit

Research and

Innovation

Unit

Postgraduate, Research and

Conference Committee



P a g e | 36

Deputy Dean (Student Affairs and Alumni) Organizational Structure (QM) A6

Deputy Dean

(Student Affairs and Alumni)

Mentor Mentee Unit Alumni Unit Graduate Employability Unit

Dean

SECTION A

TEACHING

&

LEARNING

CHECKLIST

CT (QM)-FE

Section A P a g e | 37 A1

1. Main Item Checklist

a) Course Plan/Course Syllabus

b) SMP list

c) Attendance List

d) Teaching Appointment Letter

e) Course Evaluation Form and End Semester Report (ESR) Analysis

f) MyMark

g) Student Survey Analysis

2. Delivery Method

a) Lecture & Tutorial

b) Cooperative Learning

c) Site/Industrial Visit

d) PBL

e) Project

f) Laboratory


Course File

Checklist

CT(QM)-FE-01



Lecture & Tutorial

Checklist

1. Lecture Materials a) Lecture notes 2. Tutorial Materials a) Tutorial Question (s)/ Tutorial Answer Scheme(s) 3. Assessments Method a) Test(s) i) Question(s) ii) Answer(s) iii) Moderation Form b) Quiz (s)

i) Question(s) c) Assignment(s)/ Project i) Question(s) ii) Complex Engineering Moderation Form d) Final Exam i) Question(s) ii) Answer (s) iii) Moderation Form iv) Bloom Taxonomy v) Sample of Final Exam Answer Sheet

e) Tutorial (s) [optional] i) Question(s)/Answer Scheme (s)

CT(QM)-FE-02


1. Cooperative Learning Materials a) Group Distribution b) Question(s)/Task(s) 2. Assessments Method a) Report Presentation i) Report Presentation Rubric ii) Team Work Evaluation Form b) Oral Presentation/ Team Demonstration i) Oral Presentation Rubric ii) Team Work Evaluation Form iii) Supporting Documents (Picture, Presentation Slides)


Cooperative Learning

Checklist

CT(QM)-FE-03



Site/Industrial Visit

Checklist

1. Site/ Industrial Visit Materials a) Proposal b) Application Letter c) Logistic Booking d) Letter/Token of Appreciation 2. Assessments Method a) Student’s Log Book i) Report of Student’s Self Reflection ii) Miscellaneous (pictures)

CT(QM)-FE-04



Project

Checklist

1. Project Materials a) Group Distribution b) Question(s)/Task(s) 2. Assessments Method a) Report Presentation i) Report Presentation Rubric ii) Team Work Evaluation Form b) Oral Presentation/ Team Demonstration i) Oral Presentation Rubric ii) Team Work Evaluation Form iii) Supporting Documents (Picture, Presentation Slides)

CT(QM)-FE-05



Laboratory

Checklist

1. Laboratory Materials a) Group Distribution 2. Assessments Method a) Report Presentation i) Report Presentation Rubric ii) Team Work Evaluation Form iii) Conducting Experiment/Laboratory work (optional) b) Project Refer to CT(QM)-FE-15

CT(QM)-FE-06



Problem Based Learning (PBL)

Checklist

1. Project Based Learning (PBL) a) PBL Course Plan (trigger, FILA Table) b) Group Distribution 2. Assessments Method a) Report Presentation i) Report Presentation Rubric ii) Team Work Evaluation Form b) Oral Presentation/ Team Demonstration i) Oral Presentation Rubric ii) Team Work Evaluation Form iii) Supporting Documents (Picture, Presentation Slides) c) Log Book i) Log Book Rubric ii) Gantt Chart iii) Daily/Weekly Report iv) FILA Table

CT(QM)-FE-07



Final Year Project I (FYP I)

Checklist

1. FYP Main Material a) List of Project Proposal b) List of Project Student d) FYP 1 Flow Chart f) FYP Project Selection Form g) FYP 2 Thesis Submission Form h) Student’s Log Book i) Thesis Report Manual 2. Facilitators a) Lecturer CV b) Invited Speaker CV 3. Assessment Forms a) FYP 1 i) FYP 1 Supervisor’s Rubric b) FYP 2 i) FYP 2 Supervisor’s Rubric ii) FYP 1 Examiner’s Rubric iii) Oral Presentation’s Rubric

CT(QM)-FE-08



Final Year Project II (FYP II)

Checklist

1. FYP Main Material a) List of Project Proposal b) List of Project Student c) Mark Rubric Form d) FYP 1 Flow Chart e) FYP 2 Flow Chart f) FYP Project Selection Form g) FYP 2 Thesis Submission Form h) Student’s Log Book i) Thesis Report Manual 2. Facilitators a) Lecturer CV b) Invited Speaker CV 3. Assessment Forms a) FYP 1 i) FYP 1 Supervisor’s Rubric b) FYP 2 i) FYP 2 Supervisor’s Rubric ii) FYP 1 Examiner’s Rubric iii) Oral Presentation’s Rubric

CT(QM)-FE-09



Industrial Training (LI)

Checklist

1. LI Main Material a) List of LI Students b) List of companies providing LI c) Evaluation forms d) LI support Letter e) LI Report Guide f) Assignation of Visiting Lecturer/Evaluator 2. Placement Forms a) LI Placement b) LI Assessment Survey c) Confirmation on LI Placement d) Company Registration of LI 3. Evaluation Forms a) LI supervisor’s Evaluation Form b) LI visiting Lecturer’s Evaluation Form c) LI Report Presentation Rubric d) Oral Presentation Evaluation Form e) Log Book Evaluation Form 4 Supporting Documents a) LI Survey

CT(QM)-FE-10



Integrated Design Project (IDP)

Checklist

1. IDP Main Material a) Student Grouping 2. Project Documents a) Relevant Drawings & Documents (i.e Architectural drawing, site plan and

etc.)

b) Student guidelines 3) Facilitators a) Invitation Letter/ CV (Facilitator from Industry) 4) Assessment Form a) IDP 1 i) Inception Report Rubric ii) Progress Report Rubric iii) Preliminary Design Report Rubric iv) Oral Presentation/ Team Demonstration v) Log Book Rubric vi) Peer Evaluation b IDP II i) Progress Report Rubric ii) Final Design Report Rubric iii) Oral presentation/Team Demonstration iv) Log Book Rubric v) Peer Evaluation 5. Minutes of IDP meeting between lecturers

CT(QM)-FE-11

SECTION B

APPOINTMENT

CHECKLIST

CA (QM)-FE

SECTION B P a g e | 48 B1


INDUSTRIAL ADVISORY PANEL (IAP)

Checklist

Name :

Designation :

Affiliation :

Email: :

1. Criteria

PhD in Engineering AND three years of engineering or related experience;

OR

Master in engineering AND five years of engineering or related experience;

OR

Bachelor’s degree in Engineering or related field AND six years of engineering or related experience;

OR

Ten years of engineering or related experience;

OR

Any equivalent combination of experience, training and/or education approved by the DEAN of Engineering Faculty

Is currently at related Engineering Companies/ Agencies

Has hands-on related expertise in engineering principles, procedures, and/or applications

2.

Procedure:

A complete CV of nominated IAP

CA(QM)-FE-01


Endorsement by the Faculty Academic Committee (JK Akademik Fakulti)

3. Approval

Endorsed in Faculty Meeting

Endorsed in JPPA Meeting

DVC (Academic & International Affairs)

4. Appointment/Extensions of appointment

Invitation letter to IAP

Letter of response from IAP

5. Meeting/discussion

At least once a year

Submission of report (CT(QM)FE-11)

Submission of improvement report to IAP by Head of Department



ADJUNCT PROFESSOR

Checklist

Name :

Designation :

Affiliation :

Email: :

1. Criteria

Academic/professional qualifications/experience should be appropriate [or equivalent] to the course examined.

Have appropriate standing, expertise and experience to maintain comparability of standards. Standing, expertise and breadth of experience may be indicated by:

a) The present post and place of work

b) The range and scope of experience across Higher Education/professions

c) Current and recent active involvement in research/scholarly/professional activities in the field of study concerned

Have recent external examining experience to indicate competence in decision making

Should not concurrently hold more than the equivalent of two substantial external examining appointment to prevent over-extending his/her examining

2. Procedure:

A complete CV of nominated IAP


CA(QM)-FE-02


3. Approval





Invitation letter to Adjunct Professor

Letter of response from Adjunct Professor




Submission of improvement report to Adjunct Professor by Head of Department

6.

Termination of Appointment/Resignation

Failure to undertake the adjunct Professor duties

Changes to the level of a course on re-validation and the adjunct Professor no longer meets the criteria for appointment

End of appointment period



INTERNATIONAL ADVISOR

Checklist

Name :

Designation :

Affiliation :

Email: :

1. Criteria


Have recent external examining experience’

Known or very well-known person in the field.

2.

Procedure

A complete CV of nominated International Advisor


3. Nomination

Complete curriculum vitae should contain:

Present post and place of work [outside Malaysia]

The range and scope of experience across Higher Education/ professions

Current and recent active involvement in research/ scholarly/professional activities in the field of study concerned

CA(QM)-FE-03


3. Approval





Invitation letter to International Advisor

Letter of response from International Advisor




Submission of improvement report to international Advisor by Head of Department

6. Termination of Appointment/Resignation

Failure to undertake the International Advisor duties

Changes to the level of a course on re-validation and the International Advisor no longer meets the criteria for appointment




EXTERNAL EXAMINER

(LOCAL/INTERNATIONAL)

Checklist

Name :

Designation :

Affiliation :

Email: :

1. Criteria


Have recent external examining experience’

Known or very well-known person in the field.

Should not hold more than two substantial external examining appointments

2.

Procedure

A complete CV of nominated External Examiner


3. Nomination Complete curriculum vitae should contain:

Present post and place of work [within Malaysia/outside Malaysia]

The range and scope of experience across Higher Education/ professions

Current and recent active involvement in research/ scholarly/professional activities in the field of study concerned

CA(QM)-FE-04


4. Approval





Invitation letter to External Examiner

Letter of response from External Examiner




Submission of improvement report to External Examiner by Head of Department

7. Termination of Appointment/Resignation

Failure to undertake the External Examiner duties

Changes to the level of a course on re-validation and the International Advisor no longer meets the criteria for appointment




INVITED LECTURER/SPEAKER & FLYING LECTURER

Checklist

Name :

Designation :

Affiliation :

Email: :

1. Criteria


OR


OR


OR


OR


2.

Procedure:

A complete CV of nominated Invited Lecturer/Speaker & Flying Lecturer


3. Budget &Approval

Budget

CA(QM)-FE-05


Approval from Head of Department

Approval from deputy Dean

Approval from Dean


Invitation letter to Invited Speaker/Lecturer

Letter of response from Invited Speaker/Lecturer

5. Evaluation of Speaker/Lecturer

Lecture notes/slides or any course materials

Student Feedback Form



BOARD OF STUDIES

Checklist

Name :

Designation :

Affiliation :

Email: :

1. Criteria


OR,


OR,


OR,


OR,


Current position in the industry (Senior Manager/Project Manager level and above)

Working at related companies/agencies

Hands/on expertise in related area principles/procedures, and/or applications

2. Procedure

A complete CV of nominated Board of Studies

CA(QM)-FE-06


Endorsement to the Faculty members

3. Approval

Endorsement in Faculty Meeting

Endorsement in Senate Meeting

DVC (academic and international affairs)

4. Appointment

Invitation letter to the Board of Studies

Letter of response/email from the Board of Studies

5. Meeting/ Discussion

At least twice before submission of proposal to Department of Higher Education, Malaysia

SECTION C

TEACHING

PROCEDURE

PP (QM)(P) -FE

PROCEDURE NO: PP (QM)(P)-FE-01

PROCEDURE NAME: TEACHING ASSIGNMENT FOR COURSES

ON OFFER

SECTION C P a g e | 60 C1

Amendment Record

a) Contents

Items and comments Date Approved by

b) Attachments




ON OFFER


1. Objective

To ensure the implementation of producing a teaching appointment letter is

implemented systematically.

2. Scope

Faculty of Engineering use this procedure to produce teaching appointment letter that

begin with department meeting until the issuing of teaching appointment letter from

Dean’s Office.

3. Reference

Quality Manual

4. Work instruction

Responsibility Work Instruction Reference/Appendix

Head of Department

1. Call for department meeting to discuss on the

distribution of teaching activities 7 days

before the meeting date.

2. Hold a department meeting

3. Ensure the distributions of teaching activities

are agreed by all department meeting

members.

Sample of teaching

assignment for

courses template

4. Ensure the meeting is minuted and

documented.

5. Prepare and submit memo attached with the

teaching assignment for courses on offer to

Dean’s Office within 2 days after

departmental meeting.

Dean

6. Sign teaching assignment for courses on

offer within 10 working days to all appointed

academic staff from the received date at the

Dean’s Office.



ON OFFER


Departmental

Administrative Office

7. Receive a copy of teaching assignment for

courses on offer issued by Dean’s Office.

Academic Staff 8.

Receive a copy of teaching assignment for

courses on offer from Departmental

Administrative Office.

9. Keep a copy of teaching assignment for

courses on offer inside respective course file.



ON OFFER


Flow Chart (Teaching appointment letter process)

No

Yes

Start

Department meeting

Discuss on teaching activities distribution

HOD prepares and submits memo attached with the teaching assignment for courses on offer to Dean’s Office within 2

days after departmental meeting

Agreed?

Dean sign teaching assignment for courses on offer within

10 working days to all appointed academic staff from the

received date at the Dean’s Office

Academic staff receive a copy of teaching assignment for

courses on offer

Academic staff keep a copy into prepared respective

course file

End

Departmental Administrative Office receives a copy of teaching assignment for courses on offer issued by Dean’s

Office



ON OFFER


6. Quality Record

No. Record Name Duration of Storage Location

Example of e-mail

Teaching activities distribution table

Minutes of meeting

Sample of memo


PROCEDURE NAME: TEACHING-LEARNING WITH LECTURE &

TUTORIAL


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments




TUTORIAL


1. Objective

To ensure the teaching and learning approach, which involves lecture and tutorial are

implemented systematically.

2. Scope

Faculty of Engineering uses this procedure to ensure the implementation of teaching

and learning activities based on lecture and tutorial are implemented accordingly,

includes designing the course plan in line with OBE approach.

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

4. Work instruction


Academic Staff

1.

Design course plan in line with the OBE

approach that is reviewed once in every

academic session for continuous quality

improvement purposes in order to meet

current demand in the engineering field.

2. Submit course plan to Head of Department

for approval.

Head of Department &

UPIK

3. Ensure the course plan is in line with OBE

approach, EAC and MQA requirements

(ensure that the course plan breadth and

depth with PO matrix distribution).

4. Submit to Dean’s Office for approval.

Dean’s Office 5. Approve the course plan within 10

working days.

Departmental

Administrative Staff

6. Receive approved course plan and

distribute to academic staff.



TUTORIAL


Academic Staff 7. Receive approved course plan from

Departmental Administrative staff.

8. Keep a copy of approved course plan into

respective course file.

9. Explain approved course plan at the

beginning of lecture session and upload to

eLEAP (e-learning portal).

10. Prepare lecture notes/materials and

distribute to student either in hardcopy,

softcopy or through eLEAP (e-learning

portal).

11. Prepare tutorial questions with answers

scheme.

12. Prepare other assessment methods as

decided in course plan.

Teaching, learning and

assessment checklist

Customer 13. Receive a copy of approved course plan.

Academic Staff 14. In week 14, measure the customer

satisfaction through student survey for

continuous quality improvement purpose.



TUTORIAL


5. (i) Flow chart (design a course plan)

Academic staff design course plan in accordance with OBE syllabus within 5 working days

Submit to Program Co-ordinator

Program Co-ordinator and committee ensure course plan is in line with OBE

approach, EAC and MQA requirements (ensure that the course plan breadth and


Start

Head of Department approve and submit to Dean’s Office

Dean approve the course plan within 10 working days.

Academic staff receive an approved course plan from Departmental

Administrative Staff.

Academic staffs keep a copy of approved course plan into respective course file.

Satisfied

?

A

No

Yes

Departmental Administrative Staff receive an approved course plan from Dean’s

Office.



TUTORIAL


6. (ii) Flow chart (teaching-learning with lecture & tutorial)

A

Academic staff prepares lecture notes/materials, tutorial questions with answers scheme

and other assessment methods as indicated in the approved course plan.

Customer satisfaction is measured.

Lecture & tutorial activities commence.

End

Continual quality improvement process commences.

Academic staff explain approved course plan at the beginning of lecture session and

upload to eLEAP (e-learning portal)



TUTORIAL


7. Quality Record


8. Attachment

Teaching, learning and assessment checklist


PROCEDURE NAME: TEACHING-LEARNING WITH

COOPERATIVE LEARNING


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments






1. Objective

To ensure teaching and learning with cooperative learning approach is implemented

systematically.

2. Scope


and learning activities based on lecture and cooperative learning are implemented

accordingly, includes designing the course plan in line with OBE approach.

3. Reference

Quality Manual

4. Work instruction


Academic Staff

1.







for approval.


UPIK







working days.

Departmental



distribute to academic staff


Departmental Administrative Staff.













portal).

11. Prepare topics for cooperative learning

activities.

12. Prepare group distribution (≤5 person for

each group and well represented).

13. Prepare assessment methods as decided in

course plan with answers scheme.



Customer

14. Receive a copy of approved course plan.










Submit to Program Co-ordinator

Program Co-ordinator and committee ensure course plan is in line with OBE

approach, EAC and MQA requirements (ensure that the course plan breadth

and depth with PO matrix distribution).

Start






Satisfie

d?

A

No

Yes

Departmental Administrative Staff receive an approved course plan from

Dean’s Office.





6. (ii) Flow chart (teaching -learning with lecture & cooperative learning)

A

Academic staff prepares lecture notes/materials, topics & group

distribution for cooperative learning activities and assessment

methods as indicated in the approved course plan.


Lecture & cooperative learning activities commence.

End


Academic staff explain approved course plan at the beginning of

lecture session and upload to eLEAP (e-learning portal)





7. Quality Record


8. Attachment




SITE/INDUSTRIAL VISIT


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments






1. Objective

To ensure teaching and learning with site/industrial visit approach is implemented

systematically.

2. Scope


and learning activities based on lecture and site/industrial visit are implemented

accordingly, includes designing the course plan in line with OBE approach.

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

4. Work instruction


Academic Staff

1.







for approval.


UPIK







working days.

Departmental


















portal).

11. Prepare application letter to Dean through

Head of Department office for approval.

12. After approval, book transportation and

prepare token of appreciation for industry.

13. Conduct survey (students and industry

representative) and produce report (FAC

report template) on the visit.



Customer











Submit to Head of Department

Head of Department and committee ensure course plan is in line with OBE



Start






Satisfie

d?

A

No

Yes


Dean’s Office.





6. (ii) Flow chart (teaching-learning with lecture & site/industrial visit)

Academic staff prepare proposal for Dean Office approval.


Continual quality improvement processes commence. ence.

End

Approve?

Academic staff prepare site/industry schedule, logistic booking, food & beverages (if applicable) and token of appreciation to site/industry that has been visited.

Academic staffs prepare assessment methods as indicated in an approval course plan.

No

Yes

A

Lecture activities are started.

Academic staff prepare lecture notes.

.

Academic staff prepare application letter for site/industry approval.

Approve?

No

Yes

Site/industrial visit activities are started.





7. Quality Record


8. Attachment



PROCEDURE NAME: TEACHING-LEARNING WITH PROJECT


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments





1. Objective

To ensure teaching and learning with project approach is implemented systematically.

2. Scope


and learning activities based on lecture and project are implemented accordingly,

includes designing the course plan in line with OBE approach.

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

4. Work instruction


Academic Staff

1.







for approval.


UPIK







working days.

Departmental

















portal).

11. Prepare suitable topics as project activities.



13. Prepare assessments method as decided in




Customer














Start






Satisfie

d?

A

No

Yes


Dean’s Office.




6. (ii) Flow chart (teaching and learning based on lecture & project)

A


Lecture & project activities commence.

End




Academic staff prepare lecture notes, topics & group distribution for project and an assessment method as indicated in the

approved course plan




7. Quality Record


8. Attachment



PROCEDURE NAME: LABORATORY-BASED TEACHING-

LEARNING ACTIVITIES


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments




LEARNING ACTIVITIES


1. Objective

To ensure the teaching and learning approach based on laboratory is implemented

systematically.

2. Scope


and learning activities based on laboratory are implemented accordingly, includes

designing the course plan in line with OBE approach. The teaching-learning activities

based on laboratories involve laboratory work, reports or open-ended questions.

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

4. Work instruction


Academic Staff

1.







for approval.


UPIK






Dean’s Office

5. Approve the course plan within 10

working days.



LEARNING ACTIVITIES


Departmental











10. For activities with open-ended system,

prepare open-ended laboratory manual and



portal).



12. Prepare assessments method together with

the answers scheme as decided in course

plan.



Customer







LEARNING ACTIVITIES








Start






Satisfie

d?

A

No

Yes


Dean’s Office.



LEARNING ACTIVITIES


6. (ii) Flow chart (teaching-learning based on laboratory)

A


End




Laboratory activities commence.

Academic staff prepare open-ended laboratory manual (optional), group distribution for laboratory activities and an assessments

method as indicated in the approved course plan.



LEARNING ACTIVITIES


7. Quality Record


8. Attachment



PROCEDURE NAME: TEACHING-LEARNING BASED ON

PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL)


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments






1. Objective

To ensure teaching and learning based on PBL is implemented systematically.

2. Scope


and learning activities based on lecture and PBL are implemented accordingly, includes

designing the course plan in line with OBE approach.

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

4. Work instruction


Academic Staff

1.







for approval.


UPIK







working days.

Departmental















10. Prepare PBL course plan and distribute

to student either in hardcopy, softcopy or through eLEAP (e-learning portal).




portal).

13. Prepare suitable topics as PBL activities.







Customer















Start






Satisfie

d?

A

No

Yes


Dean’s Office.





6. (ii) Flow chart (teaching and learning based on PBL)

A


End




Academic staff prepare PBL course plan, topics & group distribution for PBL activity and an assessments method as

indicated in the approved course plan

PBL activities commence.





7. Quality Record

No. Record Name Expiring Period Location

8. Attachment



PROCEDURE NAME: TEACHING-LEARNING BASED ON FINAL

YEAR PROJECT (FYP)


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments




YEAR PROJECT (FYP)


1. Objective

To ensure teaching and learning based on FYP is implemented systematically.

2. Scope

This procedure is intended for:

a) Management Representative

b) Head of Department

c) FYP Coordinator

d) Academic staff

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

FYP Manual

4. Work instruction


Academic Staff 1. Propose list of FYP titles and submit to

FYP coordinator 3 weeks before the

semester commences.

FYP coordinator

2. Display FYP titles on Department’s

notice board or e-learning eLEAP.

Customer

3. Customer fills up FYP selection form

with 3 title options from the given list.

FYP Coordinator 4. Announces FYP titles with students’ and

supervisor name through e-learning

eLEAP or Department’s notice board.

5. Distribute log book and FYP students’

guideline to all students.

Customer 6. Attend FYP workshop in first 7 weeks

and first 2 weeks of FYP 1 and FYP 2,

respectively.



YEAR PROJECT (FYP)


7. See respective supervisor as agreed in

the FYP log book.

8. Submit 1 copy of FYP 1 report and log

book to coordinator by week 14 (for FYP

1).

9. Submit 3 copies of FYP 2 report and log

book to coordinator by week 14 (for FYP

2).

FYP coordinator 10. Prepare evaluation form:

FYP 1 evaluation form – Yellow

FYP 2 evaluation form for FYP

coordinator – Green

FYP 2 evaluation form for FYP

examiner – Blue

FYP 2 oral presentation evaluation form

- Red



YEAR PROJECT (FYP)


5. Quality Record


6. Attachment


FYP Manual



YEAR PROJECT (FYP)


UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK 94300 KOTA SAMARAHAN SARAWAK


Final Year Project Confirmation Form

Name of Supervisor Programme

No Name of Student

Matric No

Topic Project Description Signature and Date

Student Supervisor

1

2

3

4

Supervisor's Confirmation and Submission Date: _________________________ Date: _________________.

FYP Coordinator's Acknowledgement of Receipt: _________________________ Date:_________________.



YEAR PROJECT (FYP)


Flow chart of the FYP Procedure for Topic Selection

Student to find potential

supervisors to discuss about

the proposed project

Student

confirms to work

on the proposed

project?

Star

t

Supervisor to fill the form

provided and show outside

their room

When quota filled, supervisor

closed to other students and

submit the completed form to

coordinator

Coordinator updates the FYP

database and list of

supervisors available for

second round students

End

YES

NO

Second round students to

check from the list of

supervisors available from

coordinator and find their

potential supervisors



INDUSTRIAL TRAINING (LI)


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments






1. Objective

To ensure teaching and learning based on LI is implemented systematically.

2. Scope




c) LI coordinator

d) Academic staff

e) LI organization/company

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

LI Manual





4. Work instruction


LI Coordinator

1. Apply LI placement by using A1

application form.

2. Present related LI placement to LI student

through e-learning eLEAP or notice

board.

3. Inform success application for LI

placement to student.

4. Brief student before LI activity is started.

The briefing includes:

a) Report duty at the determined

organization/company and fill up

the C1 form.

b) Log book

c) Ethics

d) LI daily and end report

e) Insurance

f) Survey form

5. Collect LI student registration form, C1

from company’s supervisor 7 days after

report duty.

6. Prepare list of visit lecturer.

7. Receive grading report from visiting

lecturer (student log book and LI report).

Visit Lecturer

8. Get LI student list that need to visit from

department file.

9. Make appointment with respective

students and their supervisor 2 weeks

before the visiting activity.

10. Get permission from Faculty Dean before

visiting.

LI Coordinator 11.

Implement visit to the respective

organization/company as agreed within





the appointment.

12.

Discuss with respective student and their

supervisor separately, (if applicable).

13.

Complete LI visiting report form,

available inside student’s log book and

pass back to LI coordinator after 7 days of

visiting activity.

Organization/Company 14. Responsible for student learning process.

15. Give training and exercise related to

student learning process in university.

16. Evaluate student and fill up required

information in student’s log book.





5. Quality Record


6. Attachment


LI Manual



INTERGRATED DESIGN PROJECT (IDP)


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments






1. Objective

To ensure teaching and learning based on IDP is implemented systematically.

2. Scope


and learning activities based on lecture and IDP are implemented accordingly, includes


3. Reference

Quality Manual

4. Work instruction


IDP Coordinator

1.







for approval.


UPIK







working days.

Departmental




IDP Coordinator 7. Receive approved course plan from



IDP course file.








10. Prepare PBL course plan and distribute

to student either in hardcopy, softcopy or through eLEAP (e-learning portal).

11. Distribute log book to students.

12. Prepare suitable topics as PBL activities.







Customer


IDP Coordinator 16. In week 14, measure the customer













Start






Satisfied?

A

No

Yes


Dean’s Office.





6. (ii) Flow chart (teaching-learning based on IDP)

A


End




Academic staff prepare IDP course plan, topics & group distribution for IDP activity and an assessments method as

indicated in the approved course plan

IDP activities commence.





7. Quality Records




INVITED LECTURER/SPEAKER/PART TIME LECTURER


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments






1. Objective

To ensure the teaching and learning approach involving lectures & seminar/workshop

by the invited lecturers/speakers or part time lecturers approach is implemented

systematically.

2. Scope


and learning activities based on lecture and IDP are implemented accordingly, includes


3. Reference

Quality Manual.

4. Work instruction


Academic Staff

1.







for approval.


UPIK







working days.

Departmental











IDP course file.






softcopy or through LEAP (e-learning

portal).

11. Propose invited lecturer/speaker/part time

lecturer with CV to Dean’s Office through

Head of Department for approval.

Dean’s Office

12. Issue appointment letter

Academic Staff 13. Prepare flight & accommodation booking

and token of appreciation for the invited

lecturer/speaker (optional).





Customer


IDP Coordinator 16. In week 14, measure the customer













Start






Satisfie

d?

A

No

Yes


Dean’s Office.





6. (ii) Flow chart (the teaching and learning involving the invited lecturers/speakers

and part time lecturer)

A

Seminar/workshop by invited lecturers/speakers/part time lecturer activity commence.



End

Request for CV from related lecturer/speaker/part time lecturer (IPTA/IPTS)

Submit memo with HOD support to Dean, attach with CV and budget

Approval from

Dean

Invitation letter to related lecturer/speaker/part time lecturer

Evaluation of lecturer/speaker/part time lecturer

No

Yes





7. Quality Record



PROCEDURE NAME: TEACHING AND LEARNING WITH

COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) OR COMPLEX

ENGINEERING ACTIVITIES


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments







1. Objective

To ensure teaching and learning with Complex Problem Solving (CPS) and Complex

Engineering Activities (CEA) is implemented systematically.

2. Scope

Faculty of Engineering uses this procedure to ensure the implementation of teaching and

learning activities based on lecture and CPS/CEA are implemented accordingly.

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

OBE Manual

4. Work instruction


Academic Staff 1. Prepare and sign reviewed course plan in

line with the OBE approach.

2. Check and moderate the course plan by at

least two moderators to ensure the course

plan is in line with OBE approach.


Coordinator

3. Review and sign course plan


Dean Approve the course plan within 14

working days.

Coordinator 5. Receive approved course plan and

distribute to academic staff.

Academic Staff 6. Receive approved course plan from PC.





eLEAP (e-learning portal) for students’

reference.

9. Prepare lecture notes/tutorial materials

and distribute to student either in

hardcopy, softcopy or through eLEAP (e-

learning portal).






10. Prepare topics for assessment for

CPS/CEA elements.

11. Fill in CPS/CEA moderation form.

11.

By week 14, measure the course outcome

achievement through student survey for













Start






Satisfied

?

A

No

Yes


Dean’s Office.






6. (ii) Flow chart (teaching-learning with CPS / CEA)

A

Academic staff prepares lecture notes/materials, tutorial questions with answers scheme

and other assessment methods as indicated in the approved course plan.


Prepare topics for assessment for CPS/CEA elements.

End


Academic staff explain approved course plan at the beginning of lecture session and

upload to eLEAP (e-learning portal)

Fill in CPS/CEA moderation form.

Lecture & tutorial activities commence.






7. Quality Record



PROCEDURE NAME: STUDENT FINAL EXAM ANSWER SCRIPT

DISPOSAL PROCEDURE

SECTION D

SUPPORT

PROCEDURE

PP (QM)(S) -FE

PROCEDURE NO: PP(QM)(S)-FE-01

PROCEDURE NAME: DOCUMENT CONTROL

SECTION D P a g e | 130 D1

Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments





1. Objective

The objective of this procedure is to ensure actions taken to control, distribution,

amendment and disposal of any quality documents are implemented systematically and

effectively, to comply with the requirement in Section 7.5 MS ISO 9001:2015.

2. Scope

This procedure is intended for the management and Faculty of Engineering staff to

manage any controlled documents.

c) Reference

Quality Manual




4. Work Instruction


Management

Representative

1. Identifies qualified personnel as

Document Officer.

2. Prepare Document Officer’s appointment

letter for Dean.

Dean

3. Sign the appointment letter

4. Distribute offer letter to Document

Officer

Approval and Issuance of New

Documents

Related Officer

5. Identify quality manual documents

which need to be prepared.

6. Identify officer-in-charge.

7.

Request officer-in-charge to prepare

related documents.

8.

Prepare related documents and present to

Management Representative for

corrections.

9.

Check quality documents to ensure clear

contents and fulfils needs

10.

If documents are not in order and do not

fulfil needs, request officer-in-charge to

make the necessary amendments.

11.

Obtain approval of documents as

follows:

a) Quality Manual: Dean

b) Quality Procedure: Management

Representative




Control of Document Distribution

Management

Representative

12.

Identify recipient of the documents and

request Document Officer to prepare a

Document Distribution List.

Related Officer 13.

Prepare Document Distribution List.

14.

Mark the Controlled Copy Number and

“CONTROLLED DOCUMENT” on

each Quality Manual document.

15.

Distribute the Quality Manual documents

to the recipients based on the Document

Distribution List.

16.

Obtain signature of recipient as proof of

receipt.

17.

Keep the original documents as Main

Document.

Document Amendments

Management

Representative

18.

Receive suggestions to amend quality

manual documents from Related Officer.

Some featured amendment are as

follows:

a) Suggestion for

amendment/additions to the QM,

QP or supporting documents.

b) Amendments to the external

documents.

c) Amendments to the change in

title or works specifications.

Related Officer

19. Check suggestions for amendment

against the related documents to ensure

appropriateness and relevancy of

suggestion.

20. Consider the suggestions for amendment.




21.

If there are disagreements to the

amendments, request Document Officer

and Related Officer to make changes to

documents.

22.

Make necessary amendment to the

related documents.

23.

Record the amendment details in the

Amendment Record.

24. Obtain approval from Management

Representative.

25. Take action on Para 8, 9 and 10 if

relevant.

26. Replace old documents with the

amended documents and dispose the old

documents using proper method.

27. Keep one copy of the old document and

mark “CANCELLED” on the original

document. In case whole documents are

amended.

Publication of Documents

28. If the amendment consists 50% of total

changes in each work process or exceeds

eight (8) times of changes in each work

process, update the revision number, date

of enforcement and adjust the

amendment number for that particular

work process.

List of Main External and Internal

Documents

29. Keep the document status in Main List

updated.

30. Prepare Main List for listing and

controlling the existing internal and

external quality manual documents.




31.

List the following documents as follow:

a) Internal documents used directly

as in steps 10(a) to (d);

b) External documents used

indirectly as reference;

c) External documents should be

kept and updated by the

Document Officer and any

related officers;

d) Any amendments to the external

documents should be informed

to the relevant officer.

Disposal and Cancellation of

Documents

32. Identify documents which need to be

disposed and cancelled.

33. If the said documents need to be kept for

future reference, mark “CANCELLED”

on that particular document.




5. Quality Records



PROCEDURE NAME: RECORD CONTROL


Amendment Record

a) Contents


This procedure is CANCELLED and no longer

under QMU responsibility.

Feb, 2015

b) Attachments





1. Objective

The objective of this procedure is to ensure that measures are taken to control the

material, distribution, storage, maintenance and disposal of any records are

implemented systematically and effectively as to comply with the requirement in

Section 7.5 MS ISO 9001:2015.

2. Scope


manage any records.

3. Reference

Quality Manual

National Archive Act 2003 (Act 629)




4. Work Instruction


Related Officer

Existence

1. To accept, stamp and register letters /

documents in Letter Register at respective

departments according to the letters /

documents requirement.

2. Organize the letters / documents and the

numbering to the respective file and

records are taken.

3. In the respective files, keep the letters and

number the folio in sequence and this is

recorded.

4. If related files are not found, file the

related letters / documents inside a small

envelope until the respective files are

found.

5. For opening new files, the following

information is required;

a) Reference number

b) Titles

c) Files Classification

6. Register the new file name and code in

File Register.

7. Give the files to Record Officer for

further action.

8. Return the files after actions have been

completed for safe keeping.

9. For distribution within the department,

write down the details of the files

movement at the files front page.

10. Record files movement in File Movement

Register for inter-department distribution.

Related Officer

11. The distribution must be made according

to the records confidentiality.

12. The files that have been taken must are

returned to the department accordingly.




Storage and Maintenance

13. Protect, maintain and keep the records in

a safe place.

14. Separate the files accordingly to their

level of confidentiality.

15. For files that have attain close to

maximum level ( more than 100 contents

or the thickness more than 4 cm), the top

cover must be crossed with red ink and the

words “CLOSED AND NEW CHAPTER

OPENED” are written with a permanent

blue or black ink with the date recorded.

Write Off

16. Check the File Register to identify the

records that had exceed the storage time

limit or inactive.

17. Prepare the list of files to be write off by

using File Write Off List Format.

18. Separate the files according to the write

off category and prepare the index for

write off files.

19.

20.

21.

Inform Management Representative for

write off task.

Receive result from Management

Representative.

Update and organize Faculty’s record.




5. Quality Records


5.1 Related Files 5 Years Related Officer

5.2 File Movement Register Until no more

required

Related Officer

5.3 File Register Until no more

required

Related Officer

5.4 File Write Off List Format Until no more

required

Related Officer


PROCEDURE NAME: INTERNAL AUDIT


Amendment Records

a) Contents


b) Attachments





1. Objective

The objective of this procedure is to ensure the inspection on UNIMAS quality

management system's implement action is carried out systematically in accordance to

the clause 8.2.2.

2. Scope

This procedure is intended for the management, Internal Audit Co-ordinator, Internal

Audit Team and Faculty of Engineering staff preparation for auditing purposes.

3. Reference

Quality Manual




4. Work Instruction

Responsibility Work Instruction Reference /

Attachment

Planning Level

Management

Representative 1. Plan and provide Annual Audit Table.

2. Identify the qualified personnel for

appointment as Internal Audit Coordinator

and Internal Audit Team members, by

considering following matters:

a) Suitability in terms of academic

qualification and officer position

level;

b) Has been given internal audit

training;

c) Officer services period (at least

after a year of service);

d) Officer commitment towards the

implementation of Faculty of

Engineering Quality Management

System; and

e) Quality system complexity to

determine number of personnel that

need to be appointed.

3. Present the appointment letters of Internal

Audit Team Coordinator, Internal Audit

Team Leader and Internal Audit Team to

the Dean.

Dean 4. Sign appointment approval.

Management

Representative 5. Give the appointment letters to Internal

Audit Team Coordinator, Internal Audit

Team Leader and Internal Audit Team.

Assistant Registrar

6. Manage the internal audit training for

Internal Audit Team Coordinator, Internal

Audit Team Leader and Internal Audit

Team.




Implementation Level : Before Audit

Internal Audit Team Coordinator

7. Give briefing to the auditor who has been

appointed, about the following matters:

a) Audit objectives;

b) Audit scopes;

c) Audit implementation table;

d) Internal audit procedures;

e) Implemented procedures;

f) Auditor requirement; and

g) Audit team responsibility.

8. Contact the Head of the respective

Department and inform them on:

a) Audit objectives;

b) Audit date and time;

c) Auditor involves;

d) Audit scopes; and

e) Audit needs (logistic, related

records).

Internal Audit Team Leader / Internal Audit Team

9. Make preparation for the followings:

a) Prepare

i. Checklist (2 copies);

ii. Non-Compliance Form;

iii. Logistics; and

iv. Related records.

b) Understand the procedures that

related to the department that will

be audited.

Implementation Level : During Audit

(On the Audit Day)

10. Give briefing to the Head of Department

or officers involved about the objectives,

audit scopes and how to report non-

compliance.

11. Check record/file to determine the practice

comply with the procedure and Standard

MS ISO 9001:2015 that has been set.

12. Seek explanation from the audited officer.




13. Inform through e-mail about non-

compliance to audited officer and copies

to:

a) Internal Audit Team Coordinator;

b) Internal Audit Team Leader; and

c) The Dean.

14. Discuss with the Head of Department or

audited officer about the following

matters:

a) Identified audit findings for

improving Quality Management

System;

b) Correction period from audited

officer;

c) Next audit date that has been

mutually approved.

d) Suggested corrective actions; and

e) Suitable preventive actions.

Implementation Level: After Audit

15. Perform corrective actions that have been

identified earlier.

16. Seek explanation if there are still no

actions taken.

17. If corrective actions have been taken, note

it down in the reports.

Report Preparation Level

Internal Audit Team Leader

18. Prepare Audit Report Summary in two

(2) copies for each procedure / clause that

being audited.

19. Prepare Corrective Actions Log on audit

report summary to Internal Audit Team

Coordinator for audit report coordination.

Internal Audit Team

Coordinator

20. Gather audit reports from every team and

prepare Internal Audit Report to be

reported to Management Representative.




Management Representative

21. Check Internal Audit by considering

following matters (if necessary):

a) Corrective actions have been

taken according to actions log;

b) Major non-compliance that need

management actions;

c) Corrective actions that involve

amendment to the procedures;

and

d) Repetitive non conformity.

22. Prepare Management Review Report which

contains the following matters:

i. Objectives achievement;

ii. Customer Feedback Report;

iii. Corrective Action Report;

iv. Preventive Action Reports;

v. Improvement suggestion;

vi. Internal audit report;

vii. Supplier performance evaluation;

viii. Faculty of Engineering staff

training effectiveness evaluation.

23. Update internal audit records.




5. Quality Records


5.1

Appointment of Internal Audit or

Co-ordinator

5 Years

Management Representative

/ Internal Audit Team

Coordinator

5.2

Annual Audit Table

5 Years

5.3

Checklist

5 Years

5.4

Non-compliance Form

5 Years

5.5

Audit Summary

5 Years

5.7 Internal Audit Report 5 Years


PROCEDURE NAME: NONCONFORMITY PRODUCT CONTROL


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments





1. Objective

The objective of procedure is to determine an approach to control the services or

products that does not meet specification from being used in the process.

2. Scope


identify and control any noncompliance related to product

3. Reference

Quality Manual

4. Work Instruction


Appendix

Head of Department

1. Determine nonconformity product through:

a) Course Plan

b) Course syllabus

c) Final Examination moderation/vetting

process

d) End semester analysis report

2. Keep identified nonconformity product as a

record.

3. Communicate with the person who contributed

to the nonconformity product through:

a) E-mail

b) Phone call

4. Take corrective action on the nonconformity

product.

5. Inform department members on corrective

actions taken.




6. Report the corrective action to Management

Representative.

7. Record corrective action taken.

5. Quality Records


5.1 Non-Compliance Product / Service

Control Report

5 Years Management

Representative


PROCEDURE NAME: PREVENTIVE ACTION


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments





1. Objective

The objective of this procedure is to identify and prevent potential biasness which may

occur in the Faculty of Engineering Quality Management System to ensure that it is

implemented systematically and fulfil the needs which have been set.

2. Scope

This procedure is intended for the management and Faculty of Engineering staff,

Internal Audit Coordinator and related Officer to manage non-compliance action in Quality

Management System.

3. Reference

Quality Manual




4. Work Instruction


Appendix

Management

Representative

1. Determine the non-compliance of product

delivery through:

a) Customer feedback analysis

Internal/External audit report

b) Suggestion on preventive

action/improvement from academic

staff

2. Discuss preventive action with Quality

Management Committee.

3. Report the discussion result to Dean.

4. Implement suggestion preventive action,

once agreed by the Dean.

5. Monitor and measure preventive action

taken.

6. Record preventive action taken.




5. Quality Records



PROCEDURE NAME: CORRECTIVE ACTION


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments





1. Objective

The objective of this procedure is to identify source of non-compliance and to prevent

non-compliance from re-occurring in Faculty of Engineering Quality Management

System.

2. Scope

This procedure is intended for the management and Faculty of Engineering staff,

Internal Audit Coordinator and related officer to manage preventive non-compliance action

in Quality Management System

3. Reference

Quality Manual




4. Work Instruction


Appendix

Management

Representative

1. Determine the non-compliance of product

delivery through:

a) Customer feedback analysis

b) Feedback from Head of

Department

c) Internal/External audit report

d) Suggestion on corrective

action/improvement from academic

staff

e) Corrective action log book

2. Discuss corrective action information with

Quality Management Committee.

3. Report the discussion result to Dean.

4. Implement suggestion corrective action,

once agreed by the Dean.

5. Monitor and measure corrective action

taken.

6. Record corrective action taken.




5. Quality Records



PROCEDURE NAME: STAFF DEVELOPMENT TRAINING


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments





1. Objective

The objective of this procedure is to identify, plan, manage and evaluate the

implementation of training Faculty of Engineering staff.

2. Scope


identify and plan training programme that is required.

3. References

Quality Manual

4. Work Instruction


Appendix

Staff development planning

Academic Staff 1. Prepare staff training projection in ‘Sasaran

Kerja Tahunan (SKT)’ beginning of the

year (January/February).

Head of Department 2. Determine and identify training based on:

a) Departmental members field of

specialization

b) The needs of training

3. Submit staff training projection to Dean.

Dean

4. Approve staff training

projection/application.

Academic Staff 5. Submit application to Centre of Applied

Learning and Multimedia (CALM) for

approval purposes.

Obtain form from

CALM website

Internal/External Training Program

Head of Department 6. Identify academic staff to attend training

based on ‘SKT’




Academic staff 7. Confirmation of attendance.

External Agency Training

Academic staff 8. Apply for training.

9. Complete ‘Borang Latihan’ and submit

memo Dean through HOD.

Obtain form from

CALM website

12

.

Prepare the requirement of training such as

ticket flight and accommodation (if

applicable).

14

.

After the training, complete the required

form and conduct a knowledge-sharing

session (2-3 weeks upon return) to faculty

staff.

Obtain form from

CALM website




5. Quality Records



PROCEDURE NAME: CUSTOMER FEEDBACK


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments





1. Objective

To provide guideline for customer feedback processes and to ensure customer

satisfaction is measured and handled systematically and properly to fulfil customer

needs.

2. Scope


1. Management Representative

2. Head of Department

3. Program Coordinator

4. Faculty Curriculum Development and Innovation Unit

5. Faculty Accreditation Committee (FAC) Unit

6. Academic staff

3. Reference

Quality Manual

4. Work Instruction


Appendix

Student survey

PJPA

1. Prepare students survey to measure

customer satisfaction.

2. Share the survey link to customer in week

14.

3. Inform the customer to give feedback.

Students 4. Complete the survey form.

PJPA

5. Analyse the survey to find out the

satisfaction among customer.

6. Submit the result of analysis to course

coordinator.

Academic Staff/Program 7. Plan and perform corrective action or new

procedure/product for any relevant

comments from students

Coordinator 8. Monitor and improve the corrective action

or new procedure/product.




Alumni and Employer Survey

UPIK/Alumni Unit 9. Prepare survey schedule of the

implementation of the survey.

10 Send to respondents.

11 Each departmental Alumni unit perform the

analysis.

Alumni Unit Keep report survey analysis as a record.

Head of Department 12 Receive analysis result from Alumni Unit

13 Plan and perform corrective action or new



Academic Staff/Program 14 Monitor and improve the corrective action or

new procedure/product.

Exit Survey

UPIK/Alumni Unit 14 Prepare survey schedule of the

implementation of the survey.

FYP unit 15 FYP unit disseminate during the FYP

symposium.

Students 16 Complete the survey form.

Alumni Unit 17 Each departmental Alumni unit perform the

analysis.

18 Keep report survey analysis as a record.

Head of Department 19 Receive analysis result from Alumni Unit

20 Plan and perform corrective action or new



Academic Staff/Program 21 Monitor and improve the corrective action or


Other Stakeholders report

Program Coordinator 22 Plan and perform corrective action or new



23

.

Monitor and improve the corrective action or


Head of Department/

Program Coordinator

24

.

Plan corrective action or procedure/product

for any relevant comments from students.

25

.

Present the corrective action or new

procedure/product taken regarding relevant

comments from customer and other

stakeholders to Faculty members.

Academic Staff/Program 26

.

Perform, monitor and improve the corrective

action or new procedure/product




5. Flowchart

a) Alumni Survey

Start

Alumni Unit traces target respondents

Alumni Unit collects and analyses data

Alumni Unit submits results to HOD/PC and UPIK

Department determines

improvement/amendment/action taken

Department submits report to Faculty

Need

Amendment?

End

Yes

No




b) Employer Survey




c) Exit Survey


PROCEDURE NAME: STUDENT FINAL EXAM SCRIPT

DISPOSAL


Amendment Record

a) Contents

Items and comments Date Proposed by

b) Attachments




DISPOSAL


1. Objective

To ensure the student final exam answer script disposal implemented systematically.

2. Scope

Faculty of Engineering uses this procedure to ensure the implementation of student

final exam answer script disposal is implemented accordingly.

3. Reference

Quality Manual

4. Work Instruction


Academic Staff

1.

Determine student final exam answer script

over than 5 years.

2. Get Borang Permohonan bagi Pelupusan

Skrip Jawapan Pelajar from faculty

general office.

3. Fill up the form completely.

4. Get support from Head of Department and

approval from Deputy Dean (Academic and

Student Development).

5. Submit complete form with Head of

Department support and approval from

Deputy Dean (Academic and Student

Development) to Unit Peperiksaan Fakulti

Kejuruteraan(UPFK) members.

Unit Peperiksaan Fakulti

Kejuruteraan(UPFK)

committee

6. Responsible to dispose the student final

exam answer script according to Manual

Prosedur Kerja Fakulti Kejuruteraan.



DISPOSAL


5. Flowchart



DISPOSAL


6. Quality Records

No. Type of Record Duration of Storage Location


PROCEDURE NAME: CONDITION OF PASSING A COURSE


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments





4. Objective

To ensure the performance of individual student (passing a course) is measured

systematically.

5. Scope

Faculty of Engineering uses this procedure to ensure the implementation of condition

of passing course is implemented accordingly.

6. Reference

OBE Manual

5. Work Instruction


Academic Staff 1. Identify Final Exam Courses

2. Condition :

a) Final exam < 50%

b) Final Exam must be moderated

c) Test must be conducted and

moderated.

d) If any engineering problem

addressed, it must be moderated.

3. Total marks ≥50% (PASS)

Total marks < 50% (FAIL)




7. Flowchart




8. Quality Records



PROCEDURE NAME: EXIT INTERVIEW


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments





1. Objective

To ensure the performance of individual student assessed based on PO before graduated

are achieved.

2. Scope

Faculty of Engineering uses this procedure to ensure the implementation of Exit

Interview is implemented accordingly.

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

OBE Manual

4. Work instruction


UPIK 1. After full cycle of program, PO analysis

of each student are checked.

2. Identify students with any POs less than

50%

Coordinator / Academic

Staff

3 Call for interview / Sit for assessment

which assessed non-achieved POs / Plan

corrective action or new


feedback and changes from different

parties




5. Quality Records



PROCEDURE NAME: CULMINATING COURSES


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments





1. Objective

To ensure the culminating process on the courses are carried out to asses PO.

2. Scope

Faculty of Engineering uses this procedure to ensure the implementation of

culminating courses is implemented accordingly.

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

OBE Manual

4. Work instruction


Coordinator 1. Identify subject that need to be accessed

from each POs.

i. Minimum two (2) subjects for

each POs

ii. Total subject: Range between 15-

20 subjects.

iii. Subjects are selected based on

Appendix B in EAC manual and

culminating subjects (FYP, IDP

and LI)

UPIK 2. Perform the PO analysis based on

culminating subject.




5. Flowchart

6. Quality Records



PROCEDURE NAME: PRODUCT CONTINOUS QUALITY

IMPROVEMENT (CQI)


Amendment Record

a) Contents


b) Attachments




IMPROVEMENT (CQI)


1. Objective

To provide guideline for continuous quality improvement of the product to ensure

customer satisfaction.

2. Scope




c) Faculty Curriculum Development and Innovation Unit

d) Faculty Quality Management Unit

e) Faculty Accreditation Committee(FAC) Coordinator

f) Academic staff

3. Reference

Quality Manual.

OBE Manual

4. Work instruction


One semester cycle : Monitoring and

evaluation of the course

Academic Staff 1. Analyse CO from student results.

2. Submit feedback on CO analysis.

c 3 Receive feedback from student. (Student

Survey Analysis)

Academic Staff and

Coordinator

4.

Plan corrective action for any relevant

comments from different parties.

5. Perform, monitor and improve the new

procedure/product.

One study session cycle (1 year) :

Monitoring and evaluation of the

Program



IMPROVEMENT (CQI)


Management

Representative/ Head of

Department/ Program

Coordinator

6. Receive assessment report from

stockholders

a) Industry Advisory Panel Board

b) External Examiner

c) International Academic Advisor

d) Adjunct Professor

OR

Receive changes in curriculum via

module monitoring

OR

Analysis of student achievement (PO

analysis)

OR

Receive new policy from KPT/MQA/PPT

OR

Receive changes from external rules and

industry regulations;

a) Act

b) Policy

c) Standard

7. Plan corrective action or new



parties.

8. Present the corrective action or new

procedure/product to Faculty members.

Academic Staff/Program 9. Perform, monitor and improve the


procedure/product.

Full cycle of the program: Achievement

assessment and program accreditation.

Management

Representative/ Head of

Department/ Coordinator

10. Receive feedback from stakeholders;

a) Professional body

b) Industry

c) Employer (Employer Survey)

d) Alumni (Alumni Survey)



IMPROVEMENT (CQI)


OR

Receive assessment report from

stockholders;

a) Industry Advisory Panel Board

b) External Examiner

c) International Academic Advisor

d) Adjunct Professor

OR

Receive feedback from student (Exit

Survey and Tracer Study)

OR

Receive benchmarking report

OR

Receive changes in curriculum via

module monitoring

OR

Analysis of job market

OR

Analysis of program achievement by

graduates

11. Plan corrective action or new



parties

12. Present the corrective action or new

procedure/product to Faculty members.

Academic Staff/Program 13. Perform, monitor and improve the


procedure/product.



IMPROVEMENT (CQI)


7. CQI cycle

A. PLAN: Plan are carried out to provide enhancement at various stages such as;

i. One study cycle

a) Delivery method

b) Assessment method

c) Infrastructure

ii. One study session cycle

a) Content and course learning outcome

b) objective evaluation methods and program learning outcomes

c) Change in guidelines

iii. Full cycle of the program

a) comprehensive review of the curriculum and the program

b) Policy changes, regulatory and procedures of higher education provider.

B. DO: Academic Staff perform the change based on the plan.

•Monitor the corrective action or new procedure or product.

•Improve the corrective action or new procedure or product.

•Perform the corrective action or new procedure or product.

•Plan the corrective action or new procedure or product

Plan Do

CheckAct



IMPROVEMENT (CQI)


C. CHECK: Monitoring is accomplished via analysis and feedback from

stockholders and various parties to determine the efficiency of corrective action or

new procedure or product.

D. ACT: Institutionalize improvement, management review and identify any other

problems surfaced.

8. Quality Records


SECTION E

ATTACHMENTS

( Teaching and Learning)

CT (QM)-FE

SECTION E 1 E1

Instruction: Please rate your student according to the marking criteria below. Fill in column “MARKS’ for each criteria

with 0/1/2/3/4 (Marks in decimal point is not allowed).


Course Code & Course Name

Case study (X%)

CT(QM)-FE-03D(i)

Student Name :

Matric No. : Programme: :

Instructor :

Assignment Title :

Criteria CO PO Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Organization

Sequence of

information is

difficult to follow.

Work is hard to

follow as there is

very little

continuity.

Information is

presented in a

logical manner,

which is easily

followed.

Information is

presented in a

logical, interesting

way, which is easy

to follow.

Information is presented in a

logical,

interesting way, which is

easy to follow.

Content

&

Knowledge

No grasp of

Information and

clearly no

knowledge of

subject matter.

Uncomfortable

with content which

is only basic

concepts are

demonstrated and

interpreted.

At ease with

content and able to

elaborate and

explain to some

degree.

Demonstration of

full knowledge of

the subject with

explanations and

elaboration.

Demonstration of full

knowledge of

the subject with explanations

and elaboration.

Format

Work is illegible,

format changes

throughout, e.g.

font type, size.

Mostly consistent

format.

Format is

generally

consistent

including

heading styles and

captions.

Format is

consistent

throughout

including heading

styles and

captions.

Format is

consistent throughout

including

heading styles and captions.

Aesthetics

Figures and tables

are not in order

and fail

to provide

intended

information.

Figures and tables

are legible, but not

convincing.

Figures and tables

are neatly done

and provide

intended

information.

Figures and tables

are presented

logically and

reinforce the text.

Figures and tables are

presented

logically and reinforce the

text.

Spelling

&

Grammar

Numerous

spelling and

grammatical

errors.

Several spelling

and grammatical

errors.

Minor

misspellings

and/or

grammatical

errors.

No

misspellings

and/or

grammatical

errors.

No misspellings

and/or grammatical

errors.

References

No referencing

system used.

Inadequate list of

references or

references in text.

Minor

inadequacies in

references.

Reference section

complete and

comprehensive.

Reference

section

complete and comprehensive.

Others (please

specify)

Total:

w=

n= (n*w)=

SECTION E 191 E1

Comments:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :

Final Mark:

%100

4

w)*(n

w:

SECTION E 1 E2

Student Name :


Instructor :

Assignment Title :

Instruction: Please rate your student according to the marking criteria below. Fill in column “MARKS’ for each

criteria with 0/1/2/3/4 (Marks in decimal point is not allowed).



Team work evaluation (X%)

CT(QM)-FE-03D(ii)

Criteria/

Level CO PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

(w)

Ma

rk

s

(n)

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n=1 n=2 n=3 n=4

Attendance

Absent from team

meetings or work sessions more than

50% of the time.

Absent occasionally,

lightly inconvenience to the group.

Absent occasionally,

however not inconvenience to the

group.

Routinely present at

team meetings or work sessions.

Contribution

Contributes more than

25% share to the

project workload


50% share to the

project workload


75% share to the

project workload


90% share to the

project workload.

Preparation

Routinely fails to

prepare for meetings. Occasionally prepares

something for group

meeting but ideas are

not clearly formulated.

Prepared something for

group meetings, but

ideas are not clearly formulated.

Prepared for the group

meeting with clearly

formulated ideas.

Credit Sharing

Claims work of group

as own or frequently

blame others.

Makes subtle

references to other's

poor performance or

sometimes does not

identify contributions of other team

members.

Shares credit for

success with others and

does not accountable

for team results.

Shares credit for

success with others and

shares accountability

for team results.

Information

Sharing

Does work on his/her

own; does not value

team work.

Sometimes hold

information and not willing to share.

Shares information

with others but does

not provides assistant

to others.

Shares information

with others and

provides assistance to

others.

Demeanor

Openly critical of the

performance of others.

Sometimes criticizes

ideas of other team

members or blames

others for errors.

Does not seek conflict

resolution or does not blame others for errors.

Remains

nonjudgmental when

disagreeing with

others/seeks conflict

resolution; does not

"point fingers" or

blame others when

things go wrong.

TOTAL

w=

n= (n*w)

=

TOTAL MARKS

%100

4x

wn

w

SECTION E 2 E2


criteria with 0/1/2/3/ (Marks in decimal point is not allowed).

Criteria/

Level

CO/

PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

(w)

Ma

rk

s

(n)

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3

Professional

Etiquette

Appearance is not

suitable and untidy.

Appearance is not

suitable, but tidy.

Appearance is smart

casual.

Appearance is professional and

suitable for presentation.

No movement or

descriptive gestures

Very little movement or

descriptive gestures.

Made movements or

gestures that enhance

articulation.

The movements seem fluid and

help the audience visualize.

No eye contact with the

audience, as entire report

reads from notes.

Displayed minimal eye

contact with the

audience, while reading

mostly from the notes.

Consistent use of direct

eye contact with the

audience, but still returns

to notes.

Holds attention of the entire

audience with the use of direct

eye contact, seldom looking at

notes.

Presentation

slides/material

The presentation

slides/material has poor

legibility and visual

quality.

The presentation

slides/material has fair

legibility, visual quality

and creativity

The presentation

slides/material has

acceptable legibility,

visual quality and

creativity

The presentation slides/material

has excellent legibility, visual

quality and creativity

Communication

/Presentation

skill

The student is unable to

convey the message,

demonstrate no

confidence and

inaudible.

The student is able to

convey the message with

limited confidence, weak

voice and poor

interaction with the

audience.


convey the message with

acceptable confidence,

clear voice and fair

interaction with the

audience.

The student is able to convey the

message convincingly and

effectively with confidence,

clear voice and good interaction

with the audience.

Organization of

presentation

content

The content included is

not relevant, no structure

and no sequencing/flow.


fairly relevant, poorly

structured and poor

sequencing/flow.


relevant, acceptable

structure and organized

in a satisfactory manner

and good

sequencing/flow.

The content included is very

relevant, clearly structured and

organized in a logical manner

and excellent sequencing/flow.

Time

management

The student is unable to

present within the

specified time


present within the

specified time with poor

time allocation for each

section


present within the

specified time, with

satisfactory time

allocation for each

section

The student is able to present

within the specified time, with

excellent time allocation for

each section



Oral Presentation Rubrics (X%)

CT(QM)-FE-03D(iii)

Group No. : Programme :

Name : Matric No. :

Project Title :

SECTION E 2 E3

Subject

Knowledge

The student does not

have grasp of

information; student

cannot answer questions

about the subject.

The student is

uncomfortable with

information and is able

to answer only

rudimentary questions.

The student is at ease

with expected answers to

all questions, without

elaboration.

The student demonstrates full

knowledge by answering all

class questions with

explanations and elaboration.

Able to answer

the questions from the

audiences

Student cannot answer

all the questions.

Student hesitantly

answers all the questions.

Student can answer

certain questions but not all.

Student confidently answers all

the questions.

Others (please specify)

TOTAL w n wn *

TOTAL MARKS

%100

4x

wn

w

Comments:

SECTION E 2 E3


Name : Matric No. :

Location of Site

Visit :



Criteria /Level CO PO Marking Criteria

Weightage(w) Marks

(n)

Total Marks

(n*w) n=1 n=2 n=3 n=4

Organization

Sequence of

information is difficult to

follow.

Work is hard to

follow as there is

very little

continuity.

Information is

presented in a logical manner,

which is easily

followed.

Information is

presented in a logical, interesting

way, which is

easy to follow.

Content

&

Knowledge

Little

information on

the reflection of site visit

activities

Fair

presentation

information on the reflection of

site visit

activities

Good

presentation

information on the reflection of

site visit

activities

Excellent

presentation

information on the reflection of site

visit activities

Format

Work is

illegible,

format changes

throughout, e.g.

font type, size.

Mostly

consistent

format.

Format is

generally

consistent

including

heading styles

and captions.

Format is

consistent

throughout

including heading

styles and

captions.

Spelling

&

Grammar

Numerous

spelling and

grammatical errors.

Several spelling

and

grammatical errors.

Minor

misspellings

and/or grammatical

errors.

No

misspellings

and/or grammatical

errors.

References No referencing system used.

Inadequate list of references or

references in

text.

Minor inadequacies in

references.

Reference section complete and

comprehensive.

Others (please

specify)

TOTAL

w n wn *

TOTAL MARKS

%100

4x

wn

w



Log Book for Site Visit

CT(QM)-FE-04D(i)

SECTION E 2 E4



Laboratory Report

CT(QM)-FE-06D(i)


Name : Matric No. :

Laboratory Topic :



Criteria/

Level

CO/

PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge,

w

Ma

rk

s, n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n=1 n=2 n=3 n=4

Introduction Very little background information provided,

or information is

incorrect.

Some introductory information, but still

missing some major

points.

Introduction is nearly complete,

missing some minor

points.

Introduction is complete and

well-written; provides all

necessary background

principles for the experiment.

Experimental

procedure

Missing several

important

experimental details or not written in

paragraph format.

Written in specified

format, still missing

some important experimental details.


format, important

experimental details are covered, some

minor details are

missing.

Well-written in specified

format, all experimental

details are covered.

Results: data,

figures, graphs,

tables, etc.

Figures, graphs, tables contain errors or are

poorly constructed, missing titles, captions

or numbers, units

missing or incorrect, etc.

Most figures, graphs, tables are good, some

still missing important or required

information.

All figures, graphs, tables are correctly

drawn, but some have minor

problems or could

still be improved.

All figures, graphs, tables are correctly drawn, are

numbered and contain titles/captions.

Discussion Incomplete or

incorrect interpretation

of trends and comparison of data

indicating a lack of

understanding of results.

Some of the results

have been correctly

interpreted and discussed; partial but

incomplete

understanding of results is still evident.

Almost all of the

results have been

correctly interpreted and discussed; only

minor improvements

are needed.

All important trends and data

comparisons have been

interpreted correctly and discussed.

Conclusions Conclusions missing

or missing the

important points.

Conclusions regarding

major points are

drawn, but many are

misstated, indicating a

lack of understanding.

All important

conclusions have

been drawn, could

be better stated.

All important conclusions

have been clearly made,

student shows good

understanding.

Spelling,

grammar,

sentence

structure

Frequent grammar and/or spelling errors,

writing style is rough

and immature.

Occasional grammar/spelling

errors, generally

readable with some rough spots in writing

style.

Less grammar/spelling

errors, mature,

readable style.

All grammar/spelling correct and very well-written.

Appearance

and formatting

Sections out of order, sloppy formatting.

Sections in order, formatting are rough

but readable.

All sections in order, formatting is

generally well but

can be improved.

All sections are in order, well-formatted and readable.

Others (please

specify)

TOTAL w n wn *

TOTAL MARKS

%100

4x

wn

w

SECTION E 2 E5



Conducting Experiment/Laboratory Work (%)

CT(QM)-FE-06D(ii)


Name : Matric No. :

Laboratory Topic :


criteria with 1/2/3 (Marks in decimal point is not allowed).

Criteria/Level CO/

PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge,

w

Ma

rk

s, n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n=1 n=2 n=3

Lab Safety Practices unsafe,

risky behaviours in lab.

Unsafe lab procedures

observed infrequently.

Observes good laboratory

safety procedures.

Data Gathering No systematic plan of data

gathering; experimental data

collection is disorganized, even random, and

incomplete.

Develops a simplistic

experimental plan of

data gathering, does not recognize entire scope

of study (e.g. not all

parameters affecting the

results are investigated).

Formulates a plan of data

gathering to attain a stated

objective (develop correlation, test a model,

ascertain performance of

equipment, etc.).

Experimental

Procedures

Does not follow experimental

procedure.

Experimental procedures

most often followed, but

occasional oversight leads to loss of experimental

efficiency and/or loss of data.

Develops and implements

logical experimental

procedures.

Tool Selection Cannot select the appropriate equipment and

instrumentation required to

run the experiment(s).

Require guidance in selecting appropriate equipment and

instrumentation.

Can select appropriate equipment and instruments to

perform the experiment.

Tool Operation Unable to operate

instrumentation process equipment; hence requires

frequent supervision.

Fairly good in operation

of instruments and process equipment.

Able to operate instrument

and process equipment.

Analysis and

Theory

Application

Makes no attempt to relate

data to theory

Applies appropriate theory to

data when prompted to do so, but misinterprets physical

significance of theory or

variable involved; makes errors in unit conversions

Analyses and interprets

data carefully using appropriate theory; if

required, translates theory

into practice or applies to process model(s)

Measurement

Error

Unaware of

measurement error

Aware of measurement error

but does not account for it statistically or does so at

a minimal level


and is able to account for it statistically

Others (please specify)

TOTAL

w n wn *

TOTAL MARKS

%100

4x

wn

w

SECTION E 2 E6


Name : Matric No. :

PBL Topic :



Criteria/Level CO/

PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge,

w

Ma

rk

s,

n

To

tal

Ma

rk

s,

(n*

w)

n=1 n=2 n=3

Initiative

Requires detailed or step-by-

step instructions to complete a

task.

Requires guidance to complete

expected outcome of task or

project.

Learn independently and beyond

what is required in completing an

assignment.

Creativity Demonstrates solutions

implementing simple

applications of formula or

equation with close analogies

to class/lecture problems.

Demonstrates creative synthesis

of solution and creates new

alternatives by combining

knowledge and information.

Demonstrates solution with

integration of diverse concepts or

derivation of useful relationships

involving ideas covered in course

concepts; however, no alternative

solutions are generated.

Theory

Connection to

Practical

Solution

Does not see the connection

between theory and practical

problem solving.

Connects theoretical concepts to

practical problem-solving when

prompted.

Relate theoretical concepts to

practical problem solving.

Responsibility Has trouble completing even

the minimum required tasks.

Does not always take

responsibility for own tasks.

Demonstrates responsibility for

creating one's own tasks

opportunities.

Outcome

Prediction and

Defense

Unable to predict or defend

problem outcomes.

Occasionally predicts and defends

problem outcomes

Can predict and defend problem

outcomes.

Resources Uses little resource to solve

problems.

Uses limited resources to solve

problems.

Uses appropriate resources to

locate information needed to

solve problems.

Knowledge

Integration

Has a little knowledge on the

concept of how previous

knowledge and new

information are related.

Must be assisted in integrating

previous knowledge and new

information.

Takes new information and

effectively integrates it with

previous knowledge.

Component

Relationship

Not aware when major

components of the problem are

missing.

Missing some of the pieces of the

whole problem

Demonstrates understanding of

how various pieces of the

problem relate to each other and

the whole.

Strategy Have no coherent strategies for

problem solving.

Has some strategies for problem-

solving but does not apply them

consistently

Formulates strategies for solving

problems.

Validation No attempt at checking the

obviously incorrect solution—

no commentary.

The solution is correct, but not

checked using other methods.

The solution is correct and

checked using other methods

when it can be; the interpretation

is appropriate and makes sense.

Others (please

specify)

TOTAL

w n wn *

TOTAL MARKS

%100

4x

wn

w



Project Based Learning (PBL) (%)

CT(QM)-FE-07D(ii)

SECTION E 2 E7

SECTION E 1 E8


Final Year Project 1

Supervisor’s / Examiner’s Evaluation

CT(QM)-FE-08D(i)(R1)



Student Name : :

Matric No. : Programme :

Supervisor :

Project Title :

Criteria

CO/

PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Project Significance

(CH1)

CO3/

PO4

Problem, aim and objectives were

not identified and

presented in poor complex

engineering

problem

Problem not clearly

identified/ inaccurate

and explanation is too brief, aim and

objectives were

vague and not addressing forefront

in- depth complex

engineering problem

Problem was

identified and

addressed in a satisfactory manner,

aim and objectives

were stated and presented forefront

in-depth complex

engineering problem in a

satisfactory manner

Problem was

identified and

addressed in a good manner, aim and

objectives were

stated and presented forefront in- depth

complex

engineering problem in a good

manner

Problem was

clearly addressed,

aim and objectives were clearly stated

and strongly

presented forefront in- depth

complex

engineering problem in an

excellent manner

15

Research

gap

(CH1)

CO3/

PO4

No research gap and problem

statement identified from

the literature

review.

Unclear research gap

and problem

statement identified

from the literature review.

Research gap and

problem statement

were fairly

identified from the literature review.

Research gap and

problem statement

were satisfactorily


Research gap and

problem statement

were clearly


10

Literature

review

(CH2)

CO1/

PO2

Poorly structured review of

literature without

citation of references or no

review of

literature at all

The review of literature was not

structured in a clear

order, and most citation of references

was not done

properly.

The review of

literature was

sufficiently structured in a clear

order, and some

citation of references was not

done properly.

The review of

literature was

structured in a clear order;

however, some

citation of references was

done properly.

The review of literature was

structured in a

clear order, and citation of

references was

done critically

15

References

(CH2)

CO1/ PO2

All references

were not reliable (100% internet

content)

25% of

references were not reliable and

relevant (e.g internet content)

50% of

references were not reliable and

relevant (e.g internet content)

75% of references

were apparently reliable, relevant

and up to date (e.g journals)

All references

were reliable, relevant and up

to date (e.g journals)

5

Project design

Or approach

(CH3)

CO2/

PO4

No project

approaches/metho

ds/ parameters were provided

Some project

approaches/methods/

parameters were not outlined and/or

without any

justifications provided

Project

approaches/methods/ parameters were

fairly outlined and

justified

Project approaches/metho

ds/ parameters

were satisfactorily outlined and

justified

Project

approaches/methods/ parameters were

clearly outlined

and justified

15

Planning of

Project

Activities

(Logbook)

CO4/

PO8

No project schedule provided

Project activities were poorly

identified and not arranged practically

in a project schedule

with timeline

Project activities

were fairly identified but some

were not arranged

practically in a project schedule

with timeline

Project activities

were satisfactorily identified and

arranged


with timeline

Project activities

were clearly identified and

arranged


with timeline

5

Originality

CO4/

PO8

The work was

entirely adapted

for previous

works

The work was adapted from

previous works, did

not demonstrate

creativity and critical

thinking

The work was

adapted from previous work

and/or

demonstrated

creativity and

critical thinking in a

satisfactory manner

The concept of the work is original/

novel and/or

demonstrated

creativity and

critical thinking.

The concept of the work is original/

novel and/or

demonstrated

creativity and

critical thinking.

10

SECTION E 2 E8

Comments:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :

Formatting

and organisation

of report

CO5/

PO11

There was no

structure of report

and the formatting

The report was

poorly structured, and the formatting

(e.g: font, spacing,

labelling of figures and tables, equations

numbered and etc)

include very substantial and

consistent error

The report was structured and

formatted (e.g: font,

spacing, labelling of figures and tables,

equations numbered

and etc) in a satisfactory manner

The report was

structured and

formatted (e.g: font, spacing,

labelling of

figures and tables, equations

numbered and etc) in a good manner

The report was

structured in an

orderly manner, and the formatting


labelling of figures and tables,

equations

numbered and etc) was done properly

in accordance to the FYP guidelines

5

Commitment

& Self

Initiatives

CO4/

PO8

The student did

not demonstrate

any form of commitment in

the work (e.g

never meet deadline, less

than 2 discussion

meetings with supervisor per

semester, no self-

initiatives etc)

The student was not

committed and did

not perform most tasks in the project

(e.g seldom met

deadline, only 3-4 discussion meetings

with supervisor per

semester, lack of self-initiatives)

The student was

committed and

performed the tasks in the project in a

satisfactory manner

(e.g usually met deadline, 5-7

discussion meetings

with supervisor per semester, some self-

initiatives)

The student was

committed and

diligent in performing the

tasks in the

project (e.g consistently met

deadline, 8 – 10

discussion meetings with

supervisor per

semester, satisfactory self-

initiatives)

The student was

very committed

and diligent in performing the

tasks in the project

(e.g consistently met deadline, more

than 10 discussion

meetings with supervisor per

semester, good

self-initiatives)

10

Total:

n= (n*w)=

Final Mark :

4

w)*(n:

SECTION E 1 E9



Supervisor’s Evaluation

CT(QM)-FE-08D(ii)(R1)



Student Name : :


Supervisor :

Project Title :

Criteria

CO/

PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Project and

design

Significance

(CH1)

CO3/

PO4

Problem, aim and objectives

were not

identified and presented

Problem not clearly identified/inaccurate

and explanation is too

brief , aim and objectives were vague

and not addressing

forefront in-depth engineering problem

Problem was identified and

addressed in a

satisfactory manner, aim and objectives

were stated and

presented forefront in-depth

engineering

problem in a satisfactory manner

Problem was identified and

addressed in a

good manner, aim and objectives

were stated and


engineering

problem in a good manner

Problem was clearly addressed,

aim and objectives

were clearly stated and strongly

presented forefront

in-depth complex engineering

problem

10

Literature

review on

design and

solution (s)

(CH2)

CO1/

PO2

Poorly

structured

review of literature

without citation

of references or no review of

literature at all

The review of literature

was not structured in a

clear order, and most citation of references

was not done properly.

The review of

literature was

sufficiently structured in a clear

order, and some

citation of references was not

done properly.

The review of

literature was

structured in a clear order;

however, some

citation of references was

done properly.

The review of

literature was

structured in a clear order, and

citation of

references was done critically.

10

Research gap

on design and

solution (s)

(CH2)

CO3/

PO4

No research gap and problem

statement

identified from the literature

review.

Unclear research gap and problem statement

identified from the

literature review.

Research gap and problem statement

were fairly



were satisfactorily



were clearly


5

References

(CH2)

CO4/

PO8

All references

were not

reliable (100%

internet content)

75% of references

were not reliable (e.g

internet content) and

relevant

50% references

were not reliable (e.g internet

content) and

relevant

75% references

were apparently reliable (e.g

journals), relevant

and updated

100% references

were reliable (e.g

journals), relevant

and updated

10

Investigation of

project design

(CH3)

CO2/

PO3

No conduct of study methods/

parameters were

provided

Some conduct of study methods/ parameters

were not outlined

and/or without any justifications provided

Conduct of study methods/

parameters were

fairly outlined and justified.


parameters were

satisfactorily outlined and

justified


parameters were

clearly outlined and justified.

5

Project outcome

(CH4)

CO3/

PO4

There was no

outcome

Outcomes produced

were not meeting the

project’s objectives

Outcomes are

produced in

satisfactory manner and meeting some

of the project’s

objectives, supported with

data/ product.

Outcomes are

produced in good

quality and meeting the

project’s


convincing data/

product.

Outcomes are

produced in

excellent quality and meeting the

project’s


convincing data/

product.

10

Data Analysis No data analysis included

Trends and data have not been interpreted

Some important trends and data


All important trends and data 10

SECTION E 2 E9

Comments:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :

(CH4) CO3/

PO4

using any appropriate

technique

have been

interpreted using appropriate

technique(s) (e.g:

statistical analysis) but lack in

organization

have been


technique(s) (e.g:

statistical analysis) but lack

in organization

have been


technique(s) (e.g:

statistical analysis) and organized in a

clear and logical

manner.

Validity of data

(CH4)

CO3/

PO4

No validation of result

Results are inconsistent with the relevant theory

for experimental /simulation/ modelling

study or validated by

insufficient experimental/simulatio

n/ modelling data for

mathematical study.

Some of the results are consistent with

the relevant theory for

experimental/simul

ation/ modelling study or validated

by experimental/

simulation/ modelling data for

mathematical study.

Most results are consistent with the

relevant theory for experimental/simu

lation/ modelling

study or validated by experimental/

simulation/

modelling data for mathematical

study.

All results are consistent with the

relevant theory for experimental/simul

ation/ modelling

study or validated by experimental/

simulation/

modelling data for mathematical

study.

10

Discussion/

justification

(CH4)

CO5

PO11

No discussion is

made.

Discussion shows lack

understanding of

results, and not

supported by relevant

literature.

Discussion shows

reasonable

understanding of

results, and partially

supported by relevant literature.

Discussion shows

good

understanding of

results, and

sufficiently supported by

relevant literature.

Discussion shows

excellent

understanding of

results and


10

Conclusion and

recommendatio

n

(CH5)

CO3/

PO4

No conclusion is made.

Conclusions did not meet the specified aim

and objectives of the

project and/or did not provide appropriate

recommendations for

future work.

Conclusions are fairly explained,

meet some of the

specified aim and objectives and

suggested sufficient

recommendations for future work.

Conclusions are satisfactorily

explained, meet

some of the specified aim and

objectives and

suggested sufficient

recommendations

for future work.

Conclusions are explained clearly,

meet the specified

aim and objectives and suggested

appropriate

recommendations for future work

10

Research ethics/

Similarity Index

CO4/

PO8

100% of the

work was directly copied

from previous

works.

75% of the report were

plagiarised, and if applicable, preliminary

results reported did not

reflect ethical responsibility (e.g:

forged results, results

not presented clearly)

50% parts of the

report were plagiarised, and if

applicable,

preliminary results reported reflected

fairly ethical

responsibility (e.g: no forging of

results, results

presented in a fairly manner)

25% parts of the


applicable,

preliminary results reported

reflected

satisfactory ethical

responsibility (e.g:

no forging of results, results

presented in a

satisfactory manner)

10% parts of the


applicable,

preliminary results reported reflected

ethical

responsibility (e.g: no forging of

results, results

presented in a professional

manner)

5

Total:

n= (n*w)=

Final Mark :

4

w)*(n:

SECTION E 1 E10



Examiner’s Evaluation

CT(QM)-FE-08D(iii)(R1)



Student Name : :


Supervisor :

Project Title :

Criteria

CO/

PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Project

Significance

(CH1)

CO3/

PO4

Problem, aim

and objectives

were not identified and

presented

Problem not clearly

identified/inaccurate

and explanation is too brief, aim and

objectives were vague

and not addressing forefront in-depth

engineering problem

Problem was

identified and

addressed in a satisfactory manner,

aim and objectives

were stated and presented forefront

in-depth

engineering problem in a

satisfactory manner

Problem was

identified and

addressed in a good manner, aim

and objectives

were stated and presented

forefront in-depth

engineering problem in a good

manner

Problem was

clearly addressed,

aim and objectives were clearly stated

and strongly


engineering

problem

10

Literature

review

(CH2)

CO1/

PO2

Poorly

structured

review of

literature without citation

of references or

no review of literature at all

The review of literature

was not structured in a

clear order, and most

citation of references was not done properly.

The review of

literature was

sufficiently

structured in a clear order, and some

citation of

references was not done properly.

The review of

literature was

structured in a

clear order; however, some

citation of

references was done properly.

The review of

literature was

structured in a

clear order, and citation of

references was

done critically.

10

Research gap

(CH2)

CO3/

PO4

No research gap

and problem

statement identified from

the literature

review.

Unclear research gap

and problem statement


Research gap and

problem statement

were fairly identified from the

literature review.

Research gap and

problem statement

were satisfactorily identified from the

literature review.

Research gap and

problem statement

were clearly identified from the

literature review.

5

References

(CH2)

CO3/

PO4

All references

were not

reliable (100%

internet content)

75% of references were

not reliable (e.g internet

content) and relevant

50% references were not reliable

(e.g internet

content) and relevant

75% references were apparently

reliable (e.g

journals), relevant and updated

100% references

were reliable (e.g journals), relevant

and updated

10

Project design

Or approach

(CH3)

CO2/

PO3

No project

approaches/met

hods/

parameters were

provided

Some project

approaches/methods/

parameters were not

outlined and/or without

any justifications

provided

Project

approaches/method

s/ parameters were fairly outlined and

justified.

Project

approaches/metho

ds/ parameters were satisfactorily

outlined and

justified

Project

approaches/method

s/ parameters were clearly outlined and

justified.

5

Project outcome

(CH4)

CO3/

PO4

There was no

outcome

Outcomes produced

were not meeting the

project’s objectives

Outcomes are

produced in

satisfactory manner and meeting some

of the project’s


data/ product.

Outcomes are

produced in good

quality and meeting the

project’s


Outcomes are

produced in

excellent quality and meeting the

project’s


10

SECTION E 2 E10

Comments:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :

convincing data/

product.

convincing data/

product.

Data Analysis

(CH4)

CO2/

PO4

No data analysis

included

Trends and data have

not been interpreted using any appropriate

technique

Some important

trends and data have been

interpreted using

appropriate technique(s) (e.g:

statistical analysis)

but lack in organization

All important


interpreted using


statistical

analysis) but lack in organization

All important


interpreted using


statistical analysis)

and organized in a clear and logical

manner.

10

Validity of data

(CH4)

CO3/

PO4

No validation of result

Results are inconsistent with the relevant theory

for experimental

/simulation/ modelling study or validated by

insufficient

experimental/simulation/ modelling data for

mathematical study.

Some of the results are consistent with

the relevant theory

for experimental/simul

ation/ modelling

study or validated by

experimental/simul

ation/ modelling data for

mathematical study.

Most results are consistent with the

relevant theory for

experimental/simulation/ modelling

study or validated

by experimental/simu

lation/ modelling

data for mathematical

study.

All results are consistent with the

relevant theory for

experimental/simulation/ modelling

study or validated

by experimental/simul

ation/ modelling

data for mathematical

study.

10

Discussion/

justification

(CH4)

CO3/

PO4

No discussion is

made.

Discussion shows lack

understanding of results, and not

supported by relevant

literature.

Discussion shows

reasonable understanding of

results, and partially


Discussion shows

good understanding of

results, and

sufficiently supported by

relevant literature.

Discussion shows

excellent understanding of

results, and


10

Conclusion and

recommendation

(CH5)

CO3/

PO4

No conclusion

is made.

Conclusions did not

meet the specified aim and objectives of the

project and/or did not

provide appropriate recommendations for

future work.

Conclusions are

fairly explained, meet some of the

specified aim and

objectives and suggested sufficient

recommendations

for future work.

Conclusions are

satisfactorily explained, meet

some of the

specified aim and objectives and

suggested

sufficient recommendations

for future work.

Conclusions are

explained clearly, meet the specified

aim and objectives

and suggested appropriate

recommendations

for future work

10

Total:

n= (n*w)=

Final Mark :

4

w)*(n:

SECTION E 1 E11


KNF 3065 Industrial Training

Industrial Training Report (20%) and Logbook (5%)

CT(QM)-FE-09D(iii)



Student Name : :


Company :

Project Title :

Criteria

CO/

PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

, n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Abstract CO4/

PO9

No abstract in the

report.

Several major aspects

of project are missing.

Incomplete abstract with incomplete

description of the

project in the abstract.

Abstract contains

information on some

aspects of project. Student display lack

of understanding on

how to write an abstract.

Abstract contains

information on most

major aspects of project. Audience

understands the

abstract.

Abstract contains

information on all

major aspects of project such as

objectives of the

project, its importance, tasks,

conclusion, and

recommendation. Abstract is concise

and audience easily

understands the abstract.

2

Writing Skill

& Report

Format

CO4/

PO9

Report is poorly

presented, not following the

report format, lots

of spelling mistakes and

grammatical

errors.

Report is poorly

presented, not following the report

format, few spelling

mistakes and grammatical errors.

Report is well

organized, nicely presented following

the report format; a

lot of spelling mistakes and

grammatical errors.

Report is well

organised, nicely presented following

the report format;

few spelling mistakes and

grammatical errors.

Report is well

organised, nicely presented following

the report format;

hardly any spelling mistakes and

grammatical errors.

2

Company

Information

CO4/

PO9

No company

information in the

report.

The report contains

irrelevant information

on the company.

The report contains

limited information

on the company.

The report contains

information on the

company such as company

background,

business trend, products/service,

organisational

structure and work culture.

The report contains

extensive

information on the company such as

company

background, business trend,

products/service,

organisational structure and work

culture.

2

Project/

Training

Carried Out

CO4/

PO9

No significant engineering

experience

demonstrated from explanation

of duties. Impact

of work is unclear, with haphazard

assignments and

supervision, missing any real

problem solving

event.

Satisfactory explanation of duties

and project, but the

impact of the completed project is

not clear. Insufficient

due is given on the completed project, its

supervision, problems

and their solutions.


and project, but the

impact of the completed project is

not clear. Highlight

is given on the completed project,

its supervision,

problems and their solutions.


and project,

particularly on the impact of the

completed project.

Highlight is given on the completed

project, its

supervision, problems and their

solutions.

Clear explanation of duties and project,

particularly on the

impact of the completed project.

Highlight is given on

the completed project, its

supervision,

problems and their solutions.

10

SECTION E 2 E11

Comments:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Conclusion CO4/

PO9

Conclusions and

recommendations/suggestions are

not provided in

the report.

Missing important

points in the conclusions;

Recommendations/sug

gestions are not provided in the report.

Missing important

points in the conclusions;

Recommendations/s

uggestions are provided in the

report.

Overall conclusions

of the project area highlighted in an

adequate manner,

and the experience gained during the

training is

elaborated along with problems

encountered.

Recommendations/suggestions are not

provided in the

report.

Overall conclusions

of the project are highlighted in an

impressive manner,

and the experience gained during the

training is elaborated

along with problems encountered.

Recommendations/su

ggestions are provided in the

report.

3

References CO4/

PO9

Absence of any

form of references

in the report.

Some references that

are relevant, valid, but

insufficient in number are synthesized in the

report. References

made using own formatting.

Excellent references

that are relevant,

valid, but insufficient in

number are

synthesized in the report. References

made using other

established citation format.


that are relevant,

valid, and sufficient are synthesized in

the report.

References made using other

established citation

format.


that are relevant,

valid, and sufficient are synthesized in the

report. References

are made using APA citation format.

1

TOTAL

w= n= (n*w)=

TOTAL MARKS

Logbook CO6/ PO11

No record and no

endorsement; poorly complete

the logbook

requirement.

Missed some daily

record and not endorsed by supervisor

Missed some daily

record and endorsed by supervisor

Unorganised with

daily record and endorsed by

supervisor

Organised with daily

record and endorsed by supervisor

3

No record of

minutes /briefing

and discussion.

The minutes of

meetings / briefing and

discussion are irrelevant.

The minutes of

meetings / briefing

and discussion are relevant but vaguely

reported.

Relevant minutes of

meetings / briefing

(day, date, and time not clearly stated)

and discussion are

provided.

Relevant minutes of

meetings / briefing

(with clearly stated day, date, and time)

and discussion are

provided.

1

Irrelevant content Poor content; activities

are poorly identified and not stated.

Satisfactory;

activities are vaguely identified

and stated with no

solutions to problems.

Good; activities are

identified and stated with no solutions to

problems.

Complete; projects

activities are clearly identified and stated

with solutions to

problems.

1

TOTAL

w= n= (n*w)=

TOTAL MARKS

%100

4x

wn

w

%100

4x

wn

w

SECTION E 1 E12

Student Name :


Instructor :

Assignment Title :





Engineering Drawing (X%)

CT(QM)-FE-10D(i)

Criteria CO/

PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

(w)

Ma

rk

(n)

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Cleanliness

Technical drawing

was very messy,

have lot of carbon dirt and the paper

not in a good state

75 % of the

technical drawing

messy, have a carbon dirt and

the paper not in a good state

50% of the

technical drawing

messy, have a carbon dirt and

the paper not in a good state

Technical drawing

was very clean

with no dirt and the paper not in a

good state.

Technical drawing

was very clean

with no dirt and the paper in a good

state.

Object Line

All object lines

were drawn using

thin line (0.35 mm) and still in

construction line

75% object lines

were drawn using


construction line

50% object lines

were drawn using


construction line

25% object lines

were drawn using


construction line

All object lines

were drawn

correctly using proper type of line

(e.g. 0.5mm for

Hidden line, object line, cantered line)

Extra Line

All object lines were drawn with

incorrect

measurement (e.g. Length, degree,

size, object,

position)

75% object lines

were drawn with incorrect

measurement (e.g.

Length, degree, size, object,

position)

50% object lines


measurement (e.g.


position)

25% object lines


measurement (e.g.


position)

All object lines

were drawn with proper

measurement (e.g.


position)

Deep Trace

Drawing have more than 8 deep

trace

Drawing have 6 deep trace



There is no deep trace on the

drawing

Dimensioning

No dimensioning line have been

done or all

dimension line were drawn

incorrectly

Only 75% dimensioning line

have been done or

75% dimension line were drawn

incorrectly

Only 50% dimensioning line

have been done or


incorrectly

Only 25% dimensioning

have been done or


incorrectly

All dimensioning line have been

drawn or all

dimension line were drawn

correctly

Margin and

Text

(Dimensioning

& Title block)

All margin and text were drawn

without using

proper format.

(E.g Wrong size,

thickness,

position)

75% margin and text were drawn

without using

proper format.

(E.g Wrong size,

thickness,

position)


without using

proper format.

(E.g Wrong size,

thickness,

position)


without using

proper format.

(E.g Wrong size,

thickness,

position)

All margin and text were drawn using

proper format.

(E.g Correct size,

thickness, position)

Sectioning

Line

(Sectional

Drawing)

All sectioning was

done using

incorrect format

75% sectioning

was done using

incorrect format

50% sectioning

was done using

incorrect format

25% sectioning

was done using

incorrect format

All sectioning was

done using correct

format

TOTAL

w n wn *

TOTAL MARKS

%100

4x

wn

w

SECTION E 1 E13



Laboratory (Civil Engineering)

Fully Open-Ended Laboratory (X%)

OR

Partially Open-Ended Laboratory (X%)

CT(QM)-FE-S(i)



Student Name : :


Instructor :

Experiment :

Criteria

CO/

PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

(w)

Ma

rk

(n)

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Introduction

No background

information

provided.

Very little

background

information provided or

information is

incorrect.

Some introductory

information, but

still missing some major points.

Introduction is

nearly complete,

missing some minor points.

Introduction is

complete and

well-written; provides all

necessary

background principles for the

experiment

Experimental

procedure

No project approaches/meth

ods provided.

Student is unfamiliar with

the lab works,

depending on partner for help.

Incorrect

procedures cause ineffective

investigation.

Shows evidence of carrying out lab

works, but with

some errors. Students execute

lab works, but not

necessarily with the appropriate

apparatus.

Shows evidence of carrying out lab

works

appropriately. Students execute

lab works with

acceptable procedures using

appropriate

apparatus.

Clearly carrying out lab works

excellently.

Students execute lab works with

correct

procedures, using appropriate

apparatus.

Results and

Discussions :

Data Handling

and Analysis

No results and discussions

provided.

Incomplete or incorrect

interpretation of

results indicating a lack of

understanding of

results. Students only able to

generate ideas.

Some of the results are correctly

presented and have

been clearly made. Student able to

generate and create

ideas but many are misstated,

indicating a lack of understanding.

Almost all results are correctly

presented and have

been clearly made. Student able to

generate, create and

analyse ideas.

All results are correctly presented

and have been

clearly made. Student able to

generate, create,

analyse and evaluate ideas and

shows good understanding.

Conclusions

No conclusions

provided.

Conclusions

missing or missing the important

points

Conclusions

regarding major points are drawn,

but many are

misstated, indicating a lack of

understanding.

All important

conclusions have been drawn, could

be better stated.

All important

conclusions have been clearly made,

student shows

good understanding.

Appearance

and formatting

Poor formatting.

Poor grammar

and writing style. All sections are

in order, well-

formatted and readable.

Sections out of

order, sloppy

formatting. Frequent grammar

and/or spelling

errors, writing style is rough and

immature

Sections in order,

formatting are

rough but readable. Occasional

grammar/spelling

errors, generally readable with some

rough spots in

writing style.

All sections in

order, formatting is

generally well but can be improved.

Less

grammar/spelling errors, mature,

readable style.

All

grammar/spelling

correct and very well-written.

SECTION E 2 E13

References and

Citations

No references/

citations provided.

Most references


content) and

relevant. Most citation of

references was not

done properly.

Some references


content) and

relevant. Some citation of

references was not

done properly.

All references were

apparently reliable (e.g journals) and

relevant.

Some citation of references was done

properly

All references

were reliable (e.g journals) and

relevant.

Citation of references was

done critically

Complex

Problem

Solving

No attribute of complex problem

solving

Able to state problems in vague

and complex situation

Able to identify problems in vague

and complex situation.

Able to analyse problems in vague

and complex situation.

Able to evaluate problems and give

justifications in vague and

complex situation.

Critical

Thinking

No attribute of

critical thinking

Find and identify

ideas

Find and analyse

ideas.

Find and analyse

ideas. Make decision.

Find and

evaluate ideas. Make decision

based on the best

choice.

Others (Please

specify)

TOTAL

w= n= (n*w)=

FINAL MARK

%904

w)*(n

w:

SECTION E 1 E14


KNS4442 Integrated Design Project 1

Preliminary Design Report Evaluation (50%)

CT(QM)-FE-S(iii)

Group No. :

Semester : Programme :

Session :

Project Title :

Weight Student performance / Achievement Score

Criteria CO PO Descriptions w n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4 (𝑤 ×𝑛

4)

Produce a well-

documented report of

the designed

engineering systems

and conduct

presentations.

CO5 PO9 Language, Layout, Format

Grammatically satisfying, consistent

font and spacing and equations are numbered.

Table of contents, list of figures and

tables are properly labeled and numbered into section and subsections

with page number.

References are written in correct format.

Appendices are used when necessary.

Organize and prepare an engineering

proposal that serve the client's need and demand which also fulfill the

requirements from various statutory

bodies.

5 not

satisfactory poor

less than

expected expected best

Project Background

Brief introduction of the entire project. Assess coverage of the aims and

purpose of the project.

Assess the descriptions of the approach to the problem and its context.

Address and discuss the requirements of

the project.

5 not

satisfactory poor

less than


Conclusions and Recommendation

Highlight the overall conclusions of the project summarizing the preliminary

design output.

5 not

satisfactory poor

less than


Design solutions for

civil engineering

problems and design

systems that meet the

guidelines of related

engineering

institutions.

CO1 PO3 Project and Option Description

Clearly state the design option chosen

by the team. Explanation of concept involved.

Explanation of the design for the various

areas involved in the project with

respect to the concept proposed.

Detailing of the design involving plans and drawings.

Design considerations are clearly

presented with the relevant engineering drawings/sketches.

Were there any difficulties in design and

were they taken into consideration?

Recognize the limitations and address

any constraints of the project.

30 not

satisfactory poor

less than


Use appropriate

software for the

analysis, design and

detailing of the

engineering systems.

CO2 PO5 Technical

Design option is supported with

convincing data, plots, graphs, and hardware/software.

Drawing and plans done with software.

Use of appropriate codes and standards

that is updated.

20 not

satisfactory poor

less than


SECTION E 2 E14

Evaluate the

engineering systems in

a professional manner

and prepare an

Engineering proposal

which serve the client’s

need, demand and fulfil

the requirements from

various statutory

bodies.

CO3 PO7 Originality

Made full acknowledgement of the work

and ideas of other people.

Codes of practice, standards, references, formulas used are clearly identified.

Regulatory control – government,

council, JKR, etc. are taken into consideration.

10 not

satisfactory poor

less than


Incorporate

environment and value-

added engineering in

the design.

CO4 PO7 Design Issues

Propose value-added engineering and

creative ideas in the design.

Design matching the concept proposed.

Incorporating consideration for the

environmental issues.

Sustainable design elements and

consideration.

10 not

satisfactory poor

less than


Demonstrate

knowledge of project

management that takes

into the consideration

of buildabilty, cost,

availability of

materials, labour and

optimization of

resources to maximize

profit for clients and do

good to the project

environment.

CO8 PO12 Constructability and Buildability

Aspects

Preliminary costing prepared.

Scheduling for the project.

Construction procedures are clearly

identified and explained including site

utilization plan.

Is their chosen option buildable?

Is maintenance considered?

Is the design practical? Were there any difficulties in construction and taken

into consideration?

15 not

satisfactory poor

less than


TOTAL WEIGHT ∑ 𝑤 100 TOTAL SCORE ∑ (𝑤 ×𝑛

4)

∑ (𝑤 ×𝑛4

)

∑ 𝑤× 50%

Comments:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date

:

SECTION E 1 E15



Weekly Assessment/Log Book (10%)

CT(QM)-FE-S(iv)

Group No. :


Session :

Project Title :

Weight Score Criteria Score

Criteria CO PO w n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4 (𝑤 ×𝑛

4)

Log book

record

CO6 PO10 5 Log book is

disorganized

and only lists

briefly

activities/proble

ms.

Log book is

partially

maintained

weekly and only

lists briefly

activities/problem

s.

Log book is fairly

maintained

weekly and only

lists briefly

activities/problem

s.

Log book is

satisfactorily

maintained weekly,

lists the

activities/problems

including some

discussions for

solutions.

Logbook is clear

and well

maintained

weekly, list the

activities/problem

s including

records of

solution.

Attendance CO6 PO10 2 The member did

not demonstrate

any form of

discipline in

attending any of

group

discussion

meetings.

The member did

not demonstrate

any form of

discipline and not

attending most of

the group

discussion

meetings.

The member did

not demonstrate

any form of

discipline and

attending most of

the group

discussion

meetings.

The member was

discipline in

attending group

discussion meetings

in a satisfactory

manner.

The member was

discipline in

attending all

group discussion

meetings.

Commitment CO6 PO10 3 The member did

not commit and

did not perform

any of tasks in

the project (i.e.

never meet

deadline)

The member was

not committed and

did not perform

most of the tasks

in the project (i.e.

seldom meet

deadline,

discussion

meetings)

The member was

committed and

fairly performed

tasks in the

project (i.e. fairly

meet deadline,

discussion

meetings)

The member was

committed and

satisfactorily

performed tasks in

the project (i.e.

mostly meet

deadline, discussion

meetings)

The member was

very committed

and diligent in

performing the

tasks in the

project (i.e.

consistently meet

deadline,

discussion

meetings)


4)

∑ (𝑤 ×𝑛4

)

∑ 𝑤× 10%

SECTION E 2 E15

Comments:

Examined

by

:

Signature

:

Date :

SECTION E 1 E16



Weekly Assessment/Log Book (10%)

CT(QM)-FE-S(vi)

Group No. :


Session :

Project Title :

Weight Student performance / Achievement Score

Criteria CO PO Descriptions w n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4 (𝑤 ×𝑛

4)

Produce a

well

documented

report of the

designed

engineering

systems and

conduct

presentations.

CO5 PO9 Language, Layout, Format

Grammatically satisfying,

consistent font and spacing and

equations are numbered.

Table of contents, list of figures

and tables are properly labeled and numbered into section and

subsections with page number.

References are written in correct

format.

Appendices are used when necessary.

5 not

satisfactory poor

less than


Introduction

Description of project

background

Description of client, roles and

tasks for the project

Brief introduction of the Company

Description of project aim and

objectives and requirements

10 not

satisfactory poor

less than


Conclusions and

Recommendation

Highlight the overall

conclusions of the project summarizing the design output.

Able to give a recommendation

to the client on the most suitable

option with justifications.

10 not

satisfactory poor

less than


Design

solutions for

civil

engineering

problems and

design

systems that

meet the

guidelines of

related

engineering

institutions.

CO1 PO3 Project and Option Description

Address and discuss the

requirements of the project.

Address the relevant authorities

and bodies that are relevant to

the project

Recognize the limitations and address any constraints of the

project.

Description of options

Performing basic calculations to

show the feasibility of options

Comparisons of options and recommendations of the chosen

option

30 not

satisfactory poor

less than


SECTION E 2 E16

Use

appropriate

software for

the analysis,

design and

detailing of

the

engineering

systems.

CO2 PO5 Technical issues

Design options are clearly

presented with the relevant engineering drawings/sketches –

hand or computer generated.

Design options are supported

with convincing survey data, plots, graphs, and

hardware/software.

Bonus 5 marks for ideas that uses more than the traditional

options.

25 not

satisfactory poor

less than


Incorporate

environment

and value

added

engineering

in the design.

CO4 PO7 Design Issues

In depth study of project

environment

Address issues related to the project (i.e. environmental,

traffic, social, technical,

economics, financial, etc.)

Incorporation of green elements and sustainability in options

20 not

satisfactory poor

less than



4)

∑ (𝑤 ×𝑛4

)

∑ 𝑤× 25%

Comments:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date

:

SECTION E 1 E17


Laboratory (Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering)

Laboratory Report Fully Open-Ended Rubric /

Laboratory Report Partially Open-Ended Rubric /

Workshop

CT(QM)-FE-M(i)

Group Number :


Instructor :

Project/Experiment :



Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

Criteria PO n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Introduction

Absence of

introduction.

Very little

background

information provided or

information is

incorrect.

Some introductory

information, but still

missing some major points.

Introduction is

nearly complete,

missing some minor points.

Introduction is

complete and well-

written; provides all necessary background

principles for the

experiment.

Experimental

procedure

Absence of experimental

procedure.

Experimental procedure specified

with inappropriate apparatus and

standard to address

the problem statement


with appropriate apparatus and

standard to address

the problem statement. Some

major details are

missing.

Experimental procedure

specified with appropriate

apparatus and

standard to address the

problem

statement. Some minor details are

missing.


clearly, with appropriate apparatus

and standard to

address the problem statement.

Results: data,

figures,

graphs, tables,

etc.

Unable to

communicate the experimental

results into

figures, graphs, and tables.

Poor interpretation

of experimental results into figures,

graphs, and tables.

Contain errors or are poorly constructed,

missing titles,

captions or numbers, units missing or

incorrect

Moderate

interpretation of experimental results

into figures, graphs,

and tables. Most figures, graphs,

tables are good,

some still missing important or

required

information.

. Good

interpretation of experimental

results into

figures, graphs, and tables. All

figures, graphs,

tables are correctly

constructed, but

some have minor problems or could

still be improved.

Excellent

interpretation of experimental results

into figures, graphs,

and tables. All figures, graphs, tables are

correctly constructed.

Discussion

Absence of interpretation of

trends and

comparison of data indicating a

lack of

understanding of results

Incomplete or incorrect

interpretation of

trends and comparison of data



Some of the results have been correctly

analyzed and

discussed; partial but incomplete

understanding of

results is still evident.

Almost all of the results have been

correctly analyzed

and discussed; only minor

improvements are

needed.

. All important trends and data comparisons

have been analyzed

correctly and thoroughly discussed.

Conclusions

Absence of

conclusions

Conclusions missing

the important points.

Conclusions

regarding major points are

constructed, but

many are misstated, indicating a lack of

understanding.

All important

conclusions have been constructed,

could be better

stated.

. All important

conclusions have been clearly made, student

shows good

understanding

SECTION E 2 E17

Spelling,

grammar,

sentence

structure

Major grammatical and

spelling errors.

Frequent grammar and/or spelling

errors, writing style

is rough and immature.


errors, generally

readable with some rough spots in

writing style.

Less grammar/spelling

errors, mature,

readable style.

All grammar/spelling correct and very well-

written.

Appearance

and formatting

Major formatting

errors.

Sections out of

order, sloppy formatting

Sections in order,

formatting are rough but readable.

All sections in

order, formatting is generally well

but can be

improved.

All sections are in

order, well-formatted and readable.

Reference

Absence of

references.

References out if

order, sloppy

formatting.

The references are

written rough format

but readable.

All references are

generally well-

written by using American

Psychological

Association (APA) citation

standard.

All references are

written by using

American Psychological

Association (APA)

citation standard.

Others (please

specify)

TOTAL

w= n= (n*w)=

FINAL MARK (∑(n*w)

𝟒×∑ 𝒘× 𝒙%):

SECTION E 1 E18


Integrated Design Project

Final Report Evaluation Rubric

(Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering)

CT(QM)-FE-M(ii)

Group Number :

Session :

Instruction: Please rate your student according to the marking criteria below. Fill in column “MARKS’ for each criteria with 0/1/2/3/4 (Marks in decimal point is not allowed). Score Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

S

co

re

T

ota

l

Sco

re

Criteria CO PO

0

1

2

3

4

Insufficient design

analysis and components investigation provided (e.g.

motor selection). Over-

simplifying analysis and

incorrect component

selection is obvious. No

justification and safety factor is taken into account.

Satisfactory investigation and components design

analysis. Incomplete

components selection provided (e.g. motor

selection). A few incorrect

justification and safety factors are evident.

Complete investigation,

accurate design analysis and befitting selection of

components provided (e.g.

motor selection). Proper

justification and safety

factors is taken into account.

Proper use of computer software for simple analysis

is evident.

Complete investigation,

CO1:Develop design solutions for

accurate design analysis and befitting selection of

10

complex There is no design components provided

1.Design Solutions Mechanical and analysis and (e.g. motor selection).

(Report) Manufacturing PO3 components Proper justification and

Engineering investigation shown safety factors is taken

problems using (e.g. motor selection). into account. Proper use

Theory of of computer software for

Engineering Design most of relevant analysis

is evident.

Panel: Mechanical

Comments: Examined by: Signature

CO6: Present The solutions of the complex engineering

problem presented in no

structure and

formatting of the report

does not accordance to

the FYP guidelines

The solutions of the complex engineering

problem presented in poorly

structured, and the formatting report (e.g: font,

spacing, labelling of figures and tables, equations numbered and etc) include very substantial and consistent error

The solutions of the complex

engineering problem

presented in structured and

formatted report (e.g: font,

spacing, labelling of figures and tables, equations numbered and etc) in a satisfactory manner

The solutions of the complex

engineering problem

presented in structured and

formatted report (e.g: font,

spacing, labelling of figures

and tables, equations

numbered and etc) in a good manner

The solutions of the complex engineering

problem presented in

structured, orderly manner, and the formatting of

report (e.g: font, spacing, labelling of figures and tables, equations numbered and etc) in accordance to the FYP guidelines

2.Formatting and

organisation of

report

(Report)

engineering design

solutions of the complex Mechanical

and

Manufacturing Engineering

PO9

5

problems using

effective

presentations and

written report

Panel: Studio Lecturer


SECTION E 2 E18

3.Design Requirements/

performance (Report)

CO2: Construct

key engineering design requirements of the complex

Mechanical and

Manufacturing Engineering problems

using

appropriate engineering

techniques, modern tools and software

PO5

There was no design

requirement of the complex engineering

problem provided

Either modelling or

simulation of the

complex engineering problem provided with lots

of inaccuracies (e.g

Dynamics modelling, Thermodynamics

modelling, control

program simulation, CFD simulation)

Either modelling or

simulation of the complex

engineering problem

provided in satisfactory

quality with some inaccuracies (e.g

Dynamics modelling,

Thermodynamics modelling, control

program simulation, CFD

simulation)

Modelling and simulation of

the complex

engineering problem provided in good quality

with minor inaccuracies (e.g

Dynamics modelling, Thermodynamics modelling,

control program simulation,

CFD simulation)

Modelling and

simulation of the

complex engineering problem provided in

excellent quality with no

apparent inaccuracies (e.g Dynamics

modelling,

Thermodynamics modelling, control

program simulation,

CFD simulation)

10

Panel: Modelling &

Simulation


4.Design Requirements/

performance

(Report)

CO2: Construct key engineering

design requirements

of the complex

Mechanical and

Manufacturing

Engineering problems using

appropriate

engineering techniques, modern tools and software

PO5

There is no flow chart, no engineering

techniques, modern

tools and software used but no analysis provided

(e.g motor selection)

There is flow chart of overall/ part process but did

not parallel with overall

movement. Engineering techniques,

modern tools and software

used but inappropriate,

analysis provided but

inaccurate (e.g motor

selection).

There is satisfactory flow

chart of overall/ part process to show overall movement.

Appropriate engineering techniques, modern tools

and software used, analysis

provided with some

inaccuracies (e.g motor

selection).

There is good flow chart of

overall/ part process to show overall movement.

Appropriate engineering techniques, modern tools

and software used, analysis

provided with minor

inaccuracies (e.g motor

selection).

There is excellent flow

chart of overall/ part process to show overall

movement. Appropriate engineering techniques,

modern tools and software

used, analysis provided

correctly (e.g motor

selection).

5

Panel: Mechatronics


Lack of technical discussion of the

complex engineering

problem and lots of

inaccuracies about

justification of production

layout, manufacturing process selection,

material characteristic and

selection, production cycle time and production rate,

type of storage system and

material handling system.

Technical discussion of the

complex engineering problem provided, but with

some inaccuracies about justification of production

layout, manufacturing

process selection, material characteristic and

selection, production cycle

time and production rate, type of storage system and

material handling system.

Technical discussion of

CO3: Discuss

There was no technical discussion

Technical discussion of the

the complex engineering problem provided in

5

relevant issues of the complex complex engineering depth and logical

related to society, engineering problem problem provided in depth manner, with no apparent

health, cultural about type of and logical manner, with inaccuracies about

5.Design

Justification

(Report)

alignments and the

consequent

responsibilities relevant to complex

PO6

production layout,

manufacturing

process selection, material characteristic

minor inaccuracies about

justification of production

layout, manufacturing process selection, material

justification of production layout,

manufacturing process selection, material

Mechanical and and selection, characteristic and characteristic and

Manufacturing production cycle time selection, production cycle selection, production

Engineering using and production rate, time and production rate, cycle time and

standard guidelines type of storage type of storage system and production rate, type of

and procedures system and material material handling system. storage system and

handling system. material handling

system.

SECTION E 3 E18

Panel: Manufacturing


CO4: Discuss on

Discussion shows brief understanding of the

complex engineering problem design

requirements on the material

selection;

information and

justification are presented but

only for some components.

Discussion shows excellent understanding of

the complex

engineering problem

design requirements on

material selection,

complete information and

justification for all

components in a clear and logical manner.

6. Societal, Environment &

Sustainability issues in Manufacturing

(Report)

design requirements

of complex

Mechanical and Manufacturing

Engineering problems

based on societal, environment and

PO7

No discussion is made

on the complex

engineering problem

design requirements.

Discussion shows lack of understanding of the


requirements on the

material selection.

Discussion shows


the complex

engineering problem

design requirements on the

material selection;

information and justification for all

5

sustainability components are presented.

relevant issues

Panel: Materials


7. Societal,

Environment &


(Report)

CO4: Discuss on design requirements

of complex

Mechanical and

Manufacturing

Engineering problems based on societal,

environment and sustainability relevant

issues

PO7

No discussion is made on the complex

engineering problem design requirements.

No thermal and energy

analysis and thermal simulation at relevant

system.

Discussion shows lack of

understanding of the

complex engineering

problem design

requirements based on

energy consumption, and maintenance issues.

The discussion and analysis do not comply with the

sustainability and

environmental requirements

Final report includes

haphazard, trivial, vague

and unrelated thermal and energy analysis and thermal

simulation at relevant system.

No description of the

analyses i.e initial parameters / boundary conditions / assumptions

Discussion shows


the complex

engineering problem

design requirements based on

energy consumption and maintenance issues to

comply with the

sustainability and environmental aspects.


detailed, focused and specific

thermal and energy analysis but incomplete analysis

coverage.

Incomplete description of the analyses i.e initial parameters / boundary conditions /

assumptions

Discussion shows good




energy consumption, and maintenance issues to

comply with the


Final report includes acceptable details of thermal

and energy analysis at

relevant system. Sufficient

descriptions of the analyses

i.e initial parameters /

boundary conditions / assumptions

Discussion shows


the complex

engineering problem

design requirements

based on energy consumption, and maintenance issues to

comply with the sustainability and

environmental aspects.


comprehensive and

details thermal and energy at relevant system.

Clear and details

descriptions of the analyses i.e initial parameters /

boundary conditions /

assumptions.

5

Panel: Thermodynamic


SECTION E 4 E18

8. Societal,

Environment &


(Fluids)

CO4: Discuss on design requirements

of complex

Mechanical and

Manufacturing

Engineering problems based on societal,

environment and

sustainability relevant issues

PO7

No discussion is made on the complex

engineering problem

design requirements.

No flow analysis and/or

flow

simulation at relevant control volume

Discussion shows lack of



requirements based on flow

energy consumption, and maintenance issues.

The discussion and analysis

do not comply with the sustainability and

environmental requirements


haphazard, trivial, vague

and unrelated flow analysis and/or flow simulation at

relevant control volume.

No description of the analyses i.e initial

parameters / boundary

conditions / assumptions

Discussion shows


the complex

engineering problem design


energy consumption and maintenance issues to

comply with the


Final report includes detailed, focused and specific

flow analysis but incomplete

analysis coverage. Incomplete description of the

analyses i.e initial parameters

/ boundary conditions / assumptions

Discussion shows good


complex engineering

Problem design requirements

based on energy consumption, and

maintenance issues to

comply with the Sustainability and

environmental aspects.


acceptable details of flow analysis and flow simulation

at relevant control volume.

Sufficient descriptions of the analyses i.e initial parameters

/ boundary conditions /

assumptions

Discussion shows


the complex

engineering problem

design requirements

based on energy

consumption, and

maintenance issues to comply with the



comprehensive and

details flow analysis and comprehensive flow

simulation at relevant

control volume. Clear and details

descriptions of the analyses

i.e initial parameters / boundary conditions /

assumptions.

5

Panel: Fluids


9.Research ethics

(Report)

CO5: Demonstrate

ability to practice

professional ethics

and responsibilities based on

engineering practice

PO8

There is no discussion

on relevant issues related to society,

health, safety, legal

cultural issues and the consequent

responsibilities relevant

to professional engineering practice

and solutions to

complex engineering problems.

There is relevant discussion on issues related to society,

health, safety, legal cultural issues and the consequent

responsibilities relevant to

professional engineering practice and solutions to

complex engineering

problems.

There is satisfactory discussion on relevant issues

related to society, health, safety, legal cultural issues

and the consequent

responsibilities relevant to professional engineering

practice and solutions to

complex engineering

problems.

There is good discussion on relevant issues related to

society, health, safety, legal cultural issues and the

consequent responsibilities

relevant to professional engineering practice and

solutions to complex

engineering problems.

There is excellent discussion on relevant

issues related to society,

health, safety, legal cultural issues and the

consequent

responsibilities relevant to professional engineering

practice and solutions to

complex engineering

problems.

5

Panel: P & E


SECTION E 5 E18

10.Project

Management (log book)

CO8: Relate the

engineering design project to the

knowledge in Project Management

and

Finance

PO12

No project

organization and schedule provided

Project organization and

activities of the

engineering problem were poorly identified and not

arranged practically in a

project schedule (e.g

Organization chart, Gantt

Chart)


activities of the engineering problem were

fairly identified but some

were not arranged practically in a project schedule (e.g


Chart)


activities of the engineering problem were

satisfactorily identified and

arranged practically in a project schedule (e.g


Chart)


activities of the

engineering problem were

clearly identified and arranged practically in a

project schedule (e.g

Organization chart, Gantt Chart)

5

Panel: Project

Management


11.Cost Analysis (Report)

CO8: Relate the

engineering design

project to the

knowledge in Project

Management and Finance

PO12

No cost analysis (e.g BEP, cost benefit

analysis) provided

Cost analysis (e.g BEP, cost

benefit analysis) was

presented with lots of inaccuracies.

Cost analysis (e.g BEP, cost

benefit analysis) was

presented with some inaccuracies

Cost analysis of engineering problem (e.g BEP, cost

benefit analysis) was presented in a clear and

logical manner with minor

inaccuracies

Cost analysis of engineering problem (e.g

BEP, cost benefit analysis)

was presented in a clear and logical

manner, with no apparent inaccuracies

5

Panel: Economics


12. Peer Evaluation

(Peer)

CO7: Work

productively in a team to discuss engineering

design solutions based

on relevant areas in the project

PO10

Rank your group mates according to the individual contribution and participation in a team to discuss engineering design solutions based on

relevant areas in the project.

5

Group-mate Comments: Examined by: Signature

Report Total Mark

Weig

hta

ge

Sco

re

To

tal

Sco

re

SECTION E 1 E19

Group Number :

Session :

Instruction: Please rate your student according to the marking criteria below. Fill in column “MARKS’ for each criteria with 0/1/2/3/4 (Marks in decimal point is not allowed).

A. Oral Presentation Score Criteria

Weig

hta

ge Presenter/ Score

Criteria

CO

PO

0

1

2

3

4 A B C D E

1.Presentation Etiquette

C O 6

PO 9

Appearance is not suitable and untidy.

Appearance is not suitable but tidy.

Appearance is suitable.

Appearance is smart casual.

Appearance is professional.

1%

2.Communication/ Presentation skill

C O 6

PO 9

The student is unable to convey the message, demonstrate no confidence and inaudible. No eye contact with audience, as entire report is read from notes.

The student is able to convey the message with limited confidence, weak voice and poor interaction with audience. Displayed minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes.

The student is able to convey the message with limited confidence, weak voice and poor interaction with audience. Displayed minimal eye contact with audience, while sometimes returns to notes.

The student is able to convey the message with acceptable confidence, clear voice and fair interaction with audience. Consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but seldom returns to notes.

The student is able to convey the message convincingly and effectively with confidence, clear voice and good interaction with audience. Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, without depending on notes.

2%

3.Organization of presentation content

C O 6

PO 9

The content included is not relevant, no structure and no sequencing/flow.

The content included was irrelevant, poorly structured and poor sequencing/flow.

The content included was fairly relevant, structured and sequencing/flow.

The content included was satisfactorily relevant, acceptable structure and organized.

The content included was excellently relevant, structured, organized in a logical manner and sequencing/flow.

2%


Integrated Design Project

Oral and Model Presentation Rubric

(Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering)

CT(QM)-FE-M(iii)

SECTION E 2 E19

B. Model Presentation Score Criteria Score Total score

Students ability to develop Design solutions for complex Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering problems using Theory of Engineering Design

C O 1

P O 3

Prototype/ model was not presented.

Prototype/ model developed was far from the actual design solution s for complex engineering problem and not working.

Prototype/ model developed fairly showed the actual design solutions for complex engineering problem and working

Prototype/ model developed satisfactorily showed the actual design solution s for complex engineering problem and working.

Prototype/ model/ developed excellently showed the actual design solutions for complex engineering problem and working.

10%

Students ability to present engineering design solutions of the complex Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering problems using effective presentations and written report

C O 6

P O 9

Video/ animation/ demonstration/ brochure was not presented.

Video/ animation/ demonstration developed was far from the actual design solutions for complex engineering problem.

Video/ animation/ demonstration developed fairly showed the actual design solutions for complex engineering problem.

Simulation/ video/ demonstration developed satisfactorily showed the actual design solutions for complex engineering problem.

Simulation/ video/ demonstration developed excellently showed the actual design solutions for complex engineering problem.

5%

Total Presentation Mark 20%

SECTION E 1 E20

Group Number :


Instructor :






Psychomotor Rubrics

Chemical Engineering Lab 1 (X%)

CT(QM)-FE-K(i)

Criteria CO PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

(w)

Ma

rk

(n)

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Team

Contribution

Student carries no task during

demonstration and

does not communicate with

team members

during demonstration.

Student carries

minor task and does not

communicate with

team members during

demonstration.

Student carries

minor task and

communicate with team

members during

demonstration.

Student carries

major/ important

task during demonstration with

the guide of the team

and communicate with team members

in order to obtain

successful result.

Student carries

major/ important

task during demonstration and

communicate

effectively with team members in order to

obtain successful

result

Operation

Technique &

Knowledge

No understanding of the principle or

concept

demonstrated; inaccurately

relates

demonstration of principle or

concept.

Lacks an

understanding of

the principle or concept

demonstrated;

inaccurately relates

demonstration of

principle or concept.

Exhibits

somewhat

limited understanding or

principle

demonstrated; minor

inaccuracies in

relating demonstration.

Exhibits only

slightly limited understanding or

principle

demonstrated; minor inaccuracies

in relating

demonstration.

Demonstrates clear understanding of

principle or concept

involved; accurately relates concept to

demonstration.

Safety

Shows positive disregard for

members or own

safety (such as jesting); fails to

pass the test of

foreseeability; shows negligence;

threatens

everybody’s safety.

Expresses some degree regard for

safety, but fails

to take adequate precautions to

actually prevent

possible major harm to students.

Expresses some

degree regard

for safety, but fails to take

adequate

precautions to actually prevent

possible minor

harm.

Expresses some

degree regard for

safety and can prevent several

minor

harm but not all.

Student show

awareness of hazard; Safety goggles

and/or protective

screen used if appropriate, keeps

first aid and other

emergency equipment nearby,

takes full advantage

of facilities (exhaust fan, mirrors,

etc.).

Total:

w=

100

n= (n*w)=

Final Mark :

%904

w)*(n

w:

SECTION E 2 E20

Comments:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :

SECTION E 1 E21

Group Number :


Instructor :






Psychomotor Rubric (Chemical)

Laboratory / Workshop Work (%)

CT(QM)-FE-K(viii)

Criteria/Level

PO

CO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

(w)

Ma

rk

s

(n)

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3 n=4

Lab Safety

Practices dangerous and

risky

behaviours in all laboratory

activities.

Practices

unsafe

behaviours in laboratory and

requires

continuous supervision.

Practices unsafe

behaviours in laboratory which

requires minimal

supervision.

Practices unsafe

behaviours in

laboratory occasionally.

Practice and obey

good laboratory

safety procedures.

Data

Gathering

No systematic plan of data

gathering,

experimental data collection

is unorganized,

even random, and

incomplete.

Does not

recognize the scope of study

(e.g. not all

parameters affecting the

results are

investigated).

Only recognize certain scope of

study (e.g. a few

parameters affecting the results are

investigated).

Develops a

simplistic experimental

plan of data

gathering.

Formulates a plan

of data gathering to

attain

a stated objective (develop

correlation,

test a model, ascertain

performance of

equipment).

Experimental

Procedures

Does not follow

experimental procedure.

Follow certain

procedures

which leads to inefficiency of

data.

Experimental

procedures mostly

followed, but occasional oversight

leads to loss of

experimental efficiency and loss of

data.

Experimental

procedures mostly

followed, but occasional

oversight leads to

loss of experimental

efficiency

Develops and

implements

logical experimental

procedures.

Tool Selection

Unable to select the appropriate

equipment and

instrumentation

required to run

the experiment.

Require

extensive

guidance in selecting the

appropriate

equipment and instrumentation.

Require minimal

guidance in selecting appropriate

equipment and

instrumentation.

Able to select

certain/some

appropriate equipment and

instrumentation

required to run the experiment

Can independently

and correctly select appropriate

equipment and

instruments to

perform the

experiment.

Tool

Operation

Unable to

operate

instrumentation process

equipment,

hence requires frequent

supervision.

Fairly good in the

operation of instruments

and

process equipment.

Fairly good in the

operation

of instruments but good in

process equipment.

Good in operation of instruments and

process

equipment’s.

Excellent and is

able to operate the system.

Analysis and

Theory

Application

Makes no attempt to relate

data to theory

Applies appropriate

theory to data

when prompted to do

so, but

Applies appropriate theory to data when

prompted to do so.

Applies appropriate

theory to data.

Analyses and interprets

data carefully

using appropriate theory

if

SECTION E 2 E21

misinterprets

physical significance of

theory or

variable involved;

makes errors in

unit conversions.

required,

translates theory into

practice or

applies to process model.

Measurement

Error

Unaware of

measurement error

Aware of

measurement error with

guidance, but

able to account for it.

Aware a little of measurement error

with guidance, but

able to account for it.


but does not account

for it statistically.

Aware of

measurement error and

is able to account

for it statistically.

Total:

w= n= (n*w)=

Final Mark :

%904

w)*(n

w:

SECTION E 1 E22

Group Number :


Instructor :


Instruction: Please rate your student according to the marking criteria below. Fill in column “MARKS’ for each criteria with

0/1/2/3/4 (Marks in decimal point is not allowed)

Criteria /Level CO PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

(w)

Ma

rk

s

(n)

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3 n=4

Introduction

No background

information

provided.

Very little background

information provided, or information is

incorrect.

Some introductory

information, but still missing some major

points.

Introduction is

nearly complete, missing some

minor points.

Introduction is

complete and well-

written; provides all


principles for the

experiment.

Experimental

procedure

No project approaches/methods

provided.

Missing several

important experimental details or

not written in

paragraph format.


format, still missing

some important

experimental details.

Written in

specified format, important

experimental

details are covered,

some minor details

are missing.

Well-written in

specified format, all

experimental details

are covered.

Results: data,

figures, graphs,

tables, etc.

No results and discussions

provided.

Figures, graphs, tables

contain errors or are

poorly constructed, missing titles, captions

or numbers, units

missing or incorrect.

Most figures, graphs, tables are

good, some still

missing important or required

information.

All figures, graphs, tables are correctly

drawn, but some

have minor problems or could

still be improved.

All figures, graphs,

tables are correctly drawn, are numbered

and contain

titles/captions.

Discussion

Absence of

interpretation of

trends and comparison of data



Incomplete or

incorrect

interpretation of trends and comparison of

data indicating a lack

of understanding of results.

Some of the results

have been correctly interpreted and

discussed; partial but

incomplete understanding of

results is still

evident.

Almost all of the

results have been correctly

interpreted and

discussed; only minor

improvements are

needed.

All important trends

and data comparisons have been interpreted

correctly and

discussed.

Conclusions No conclusions

provided.

Conclusions missing or missing the

important points.

Conclusions regarding major

points are drawn, but

many are misstated, indicating a lack of

understanding.

All important

conclusions have

been drawn, could be better stated.

All important

conclusions have been clearly made, student

shows good

understanding.

Spelling,

grammar,

sentence

structure

Poor grammar and

writing style.

Frequent grammar

and/or spelling errors, writing style is rough

and immature.


errors, generally

readable with some rough spots in

writing style.

Less

grammar/spelling

errors, mature, readable style.

All grammar/spelling correct and very well-

written.

Appearance and

formatting

Poor formatting. All sections are in

order, well-

formatted and readable.

Sections out of order, sloppy formatting.

Sections in order,

formatting are rough

but readable.

All sections in order, formatting

are generally well

but can be improved.

All sections are in

order, well-formatted

and readable.



Laboratory (Chemical Engineering)

Guided Laboratory (%)

CT(QM)-FE-K(ix)

SECTION E 2 E22

Total:

w= n= (n*w)=

Final Mark :

%904

w)*(n

w:

Comments:

Examined by

Signature

:

Date :

SECTION E 1 E23

Group Number :


Instructor :






Laboratory (Chemical Engineering)

Open-Ended Laboratory (X%)

CT(QM)-FE-K(x)

Criteria CO PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Introduction

Absence of

introduction.

Very little

background information

provided, or

information is incorrect.

Some

introductory

information, but still missing some

major points.

Introduction is nearly complete,

missing some

minor points.

Introduction is complete and well-

written; provides all


principles for the experiment.

Experimental

procedure

Absence of

experimental procedure.

Experimental

procedure

specified with inappropriate

apparatus and

standard to

address the

problem statement

Experimental

procedure


apparatus and


problem

statement. Some major details are

missing.

Experimental

procedure


apparatus and


problem

statement. Some minor details are

missing.

Experimental

procedure specified

clearly, with appropriate

apparatus and

standard to address

the problem

statement.

Results: data,

figures, graphs,

tables, etc.

Unable to

communicate the

experimental results into

figures, graphs,

and tables.

Poor interpretation of

experimental

results into figures, graphs,

and tables.

Contain errors or are poorly

constructed,

missing titles, captions or

numbers, units

missing or incorrect

Moderate

interpretation of

experimental results into

figures, graphs,

and tables. Most figures, graphs,

tables are good,

some still missing important or

required

information.

Good

interpretation of experimental

results into

figures, graphs, and tables. All

figures, graphs,

tables are correctly

constructed, but

some have minor problems or could

still be improved.

Excellent interpretation of

experimental

results into figures, graphs, and tables.

All figures, graphs,

tables are correctly constructed.

Discussion

Absence of

interpretation of

trends and comparison of

data indicating a

lack of understanding of

results

Incomplete or

incorrect interpretation of

trends and

comparison of data indicating a

lack of


Some of the

results have been correctly analysed

and discussed;

partial but incomplete

understanding of

results is still evident.

Almost all of the results have been

correctly analysed

and discussed; only minor

improvements are

needed.


comparisons have

been analysed correctly and

thoroughly

discussed.

Conclusions

Absence of

conclusions

Conclusions

missing the important points.

Conclusions

regarding major

points are constructed, but

many are

misstated, indicating a lack

of understanding.

All important

conclusions have

been constructed, could be better

stated.

All important

conclusions have

been clearly made, student shows good

understanding

Spelling,

grammar,

Major grammatical and

spelling errors.

Frequent grammar and/or spelling

errors, writing


errors, generally

Less grammar/ All

grammar/spelling

SECTION E 2 E23

Comments:

Examined by

: Signature :

Date :

sentence

structure

style is rough and

immature.

readable with

some rough spots in writing style.

spelling errors,

mature, readable style.

correct and very

well-written.

Complex

Problem Solving

No attribute of

complex problem

solving

Able to state

problems in vague and complex

situation

Able to identify


situation.

Able to analyse


situation.

Able to evaluate

problems and give

justifications in vague and complex

situation.

Critical

Thinking

No attribute of

critical thinking

Find and identify

ideas

Find and analyse

ideas.

Find and analyse

ideas. Make decision.

Find and evaluate

ideas. Make

decision based on the best choice.

Appearance and

formatting

Major formatting errors.

Sections out of

order, sloppy

formatting

Sections in order,

formatting are rough but

readable.

All sections in order, formatting

are generally well

but can be improved.

All sections are in

order, well-formatted and

readable.

Reference

Others (please

specify)

Absence of

references.

References out if

order, sloppy formatting.

The references are written rough

format but

readable.

All references are

generally well-


Psychological

Association (APA) citation

standard.

All references are


Psychological

Association (APA) citation standard.

Total:

w= n= (n*w)=

Final Mark :

%904

w)*(n

w:

SECTION E 1 E24

Group Number :


Instructor :



0/1/2/3/4 (Marks in decimal point is not allowed).


KNC1032 Engineering Drawing

Instructor’s Rubric (Chemical Engineering)

Assignment (10%)

CT(QM)-FE-K(xi)

Criteria CO PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

n

To

tal

Ma

rk

s(n

*w

)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Cleanliness

Technical

drawing was

very messy,

have lot of

carbon dirt

and the paper

not in a good

state

75 % of the

technical

drawing

messy, have a

carbon dirt

and the paper

not in a good

state

50% of the

technical

drawing

messy, have a

carbon dirt

and the paper

not in a good

state

Technical

drawing was

very clean

with no dirt

and the paper

not in a good

state.

Technical

drawing was

very clean

with no dirt

and the paper

in a good state.

Object Line

All object

lines were

draw using

thin line (0.35

mm) and still

in

construction

line

75% object

lines were

drawn using

thin line (0.35

mm) and still

in

construction

line

50% object

lines were

drawn using

thin line (0.35

mm) and still

in

construction

line

25% object

lines were

drawn using

thin line (0.35

mm) and still

in

construction

line

All object

lines were

draw correctly

using proper

type of line

(E.g. 0.5mm

for Hidden

line, object

line, cantered

line)

Extra Line

All object

lines were

drawn with

incorrect

measurement

(e.g. Length,

degree, size,

object,

position)

75% object

lines were

drawn with

incorrect

measurement

(e.g. Length,

degree, size,

object,

position)

50% object

lines were

drawn with

incorrect

measurement

(e.g. Length,

degree, size,

object,

position)

25% object

lines were

drawn with

incorrect

measurement

(e.g. Length,

degree, size,

object,

position)

All object

lines were

drawn with

proper

measurement

(e.g. Length,

degree, size,

object,

position)

Deep Trace

Drawing have

more than 8

deep trace

Drawing have

6 deep trace

Drawing have

4 deep trace

Drawing have

2 deep trace

There is no

deep trace on

the drawing

Dimensioning

No

dimensioning

line have been

done or all

dimension line

was drawn

incorrectly

Only 75%

dimensioning

line have been

done or 75%

dimension line

was drawn

incorrectly

Only 50%

dimensioning

line have been

done or 50%

dimension line

was drawn

incorrectly

Only 25%

dimensioning

have been

done or 25%

dimension line

was drawn

incorrectly

All

dimensioning

line have been

draw or all

dimension line

was drawn

correctly

SECTION E 2 E24

Comments:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :

Margin and Text

(Dimensioning & Title

block)

All margin

and text were

drawn without

using proper

format.

(E.g Wrong

size,

thickness,

position)

75% margin

and text were

drawn without

using proper

format.

(E.g Wrong

size,

thickness,

position)

50% margin

and text were

drawn without

using proper

format.

(E.g Wrong

size,

thickness,

position)

25% margin

and text were

drawn without

using proper

format.

(E.g Wrong

size,

thickness,

position)

All margin and

text were

drawn using

proper format.

(E.g Correct

size,

thickness,

position)

Sectioning Line

(Sectional Drawing)

All sectioning

was done

using

incorrect

format

75%

sectioning was

done using

incorrect

format

50%

sectioning was

done using

incorrect

format

25%

sectioning was

done using

incorrect

format

All sectioning

was done

using correct

format

Total: w= n= (n*w)=

Final Mark :

%904

w)*(n

w:

SECTION E 1 E25

Instruction: Please rank your team member accordingly to your view. Tick (√) in each column.

RANKING

Matric No NAME n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n=4 n = 5 n= n= n=

Comment:

Note: 1st name should be the person who contribute the most in the group. The level of contribution decreases along the

way until the last person you entered, who is contributed the least during the making the group’s project .

Student Name /Evaluator Name :


Supervisor/Lecturer/Instructor :

Assignment Title :



Peer Evaluation (Ranking)

CT(QM) – FE – 02B(i)

SECTION E 1 E26





Project Report

CT(QM) – FE – 02B(ii)



Project Title :

Criteria PO CO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Project

Significance

Problem, aim and

objectives were

not identified and

presented

Problem not

clearly

identified/inaccur-

ate and

explanation is too

brief, aim and

objectives were

vague and not

addressing

forefront in-depth

engineering

problem

Problem was

identified and

addressed in a

satisfactory

manner, aim and

objectives were

stated and

presented

forefront in-depth

engineering

problem in a

satisfactory

manner.

Problem was

identified and

addressed in a

good manner, aim

and objectives

were stated and

presented

forefront in-depth

engineering

problem in a good

manner.

Problem was clearly

addressed, aim and

objectives were

clearly stated and

strongly presented

forefront in-depth

complex engineering

problem

Literature

review

Poorly structured

review of

literature without

citation of

references or no

review of

literature at all

The review of

literature was not

structured in a

clear order, and

most citation of

references was not

done properly.

The review of

literature was

sufficiently

structured in a

clear order, and

some citation of

references was not

done properly.

The review of

literature was

structured in a

clear order;

however, some

citation of

references was

done properly.

The review of

literature was

structured in a clear

order, and citation of

references was done

critically

Research gap

No research gap

and problem

statement

identified from the

literature review.

Unclear research

gap and problem

statement

identified from the

literature review.

Research gap and

problem statement

were fairly

identified from the

literature review.

Research gap and

problem statement

were satisfactorily

identified from the

literature review.

Research gap and

problem statement

were clearly

identified from the

literature review.

References

All references

were not reliable

(100% internet

content)

75% of references

were not reliable

(e.g internet

content) and

relevant

50% references

were not reliable

(e.g internet

content) and

relevant

75% references

were apparently

reliable (e.g

journals), relevant

and updated

100% references

were reliable (e.g

journals), relevant

and updated

Project design

Or approach

No project

approaches/metho

ds/ parameters

were provided

Some project

approaches/metho

ds/ parameters

were not outlined

and/or without any

justifications

provided

Project

approaches/metho

ds/ parameters

were fairly

outlined and

justified

Project

approaches/metho

ds/ parameters

were satisfactorily

outlined and

justified

Project

approaches/methods

/ parameters were

clearly outlined and

justified

Planning of

Project

Activities

No project

schedule provided

Project activities

were poorly

identified and not

arranged

practically in a

Project activities

were fairly

identified but

some were not

arranged

practically in a

Project activities

were satisfactorily

identified and

arranged

practically in a

Project activities

were clearly

identified and

arranged practically

SECTION E 2 E26

Comment:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :

project schedule

with timeline

project schedule

with timeline

project schedule

with timeline

in a project schedule

with timeline

Originality

The work was

entirely adapted

for previous works

The work was

adapted from

previous works,

did not

demonstrate

creativity and

critical thinking

The work was

adapted from

previous work

and/or

demonstrated

creativity and

critical thinking in

a satisfactory

manner

The concept of the

work is original/

novel and/or

demonstrated

creativity and

critical thinking.

The concept of the

work is original/

novel and/or

demonstrated

creativity and critical

thinking.

Commitment

& Self

Initiatives

The student did

not demonstrate

any form of

commitment in the

work (e.g never

meet deadline,

less than 2

discussion

meetings with

supervisor per

semester, no self-

initiatives etc)

The student was

not committed and

did not perform

most tasks in the

project (e.g

seldom met

deadline, only 3-4

discussion

meetings with

supervisor per

semester, lack of

self-initiatives)

The student was

committed and

performed the


in a satisfactory

manner (e.g

usually met

deadline, 5-7

discussion

meetings with

supervisor per

semester, some

self-initiatives)

The student was

committed and

diligent in

performing the


(e.g consistently

met deadline, 8 –

10 discussion

meetings with

supervisor per

semester,

satisfactory self-

initiatives)

The student was very

committed and

diligent in

performing the tasks

in the project (e.g

consistently met

deadline, more than

10 discussion

meetings with

supervisor per

semester, good self-

initiatives)

Formatting

and

organisation of

report

There was no

structure of report

and the formatting

The report was

poorly structured,

and the formatting


labelling of figures

and tables,

equations

numbered and etc)

include very

substantial and

consistent error

The report was

structured and

formatted (e.g:

font, spacing,


and tables,

equations

numbered and etc)

in a satisfactory

manner

The report was

structured and

formatted (e.g:

font, spacing,


and tables,

equations

numbered and etc)

in a good manner

The report was

structured in an

orderly manner, and

the formatting (e.g:

font, spacing,


and tables, equations

numbered and etc)

was done properly in

accordance to the

FYP guidelines

Others (please

specify)

Total:

w=

n= (n*w)=

Final Mark :

4

w)*(n:

SECTION E 1 E27





Psychomotor Rubrics (X%)

CT(QM) – FE – 02B(iii)



Project Title :

Criteria PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Team

Contribution

Student carries no

task during

demonstration and does not

communicate with

team members during demonstration.

Student carries

minor task and

does not communicate with

team members

during demonstration.

Student carries minor task and

communicate with

team members during

demonstration.

Student carries

major/ important

task during demonstration with

the guide of the

team and communicate with

team members in

order to obtain successful result.

Student carries major/ important

task during

demonstration and communicate

effectively with

team members in order to obtain

successful result

Operation

Technique &

Knowledge

No understanding of

the principle or concept

demonstrated;

inaccurately relates demonstration of

principle or concept.

Lacks an

understanding of

the principle or

concept

demonstrated; inaccurately

relates

demonstration of principle or

concept.

Exhibits somewhat

limited

understanding or

principle demonstrated;

minor inaccuracies

in relating demonstration.

Exhibits only

slightly limited

understanding or

principle demonstrated;

minor inaccuracies

in relating demonstration.

Demonstrates

clear

understanding of principle or

concept

involved; accurately relates

concept to

demonstration.

Safety

Shows positive

disregard for members or own

safety (such as

jesting); fails to pass the test of

foreseeability; shows

negligence; threatens everybody’s safety.


safety, but fails to take adequate

precautions to

actually prevent possible major

harm to students.


safety, but fails to take adequate

precautions to

actually prevent possible minor

harm.

Expresses some

degree regard for safety and can

prevent several

minor harm but not all.

Student show

awareness of hazard; Safety

goggles and/or

protective screen used if

Appropriate, keeps first

aid and other

emergency equipment

nearby, takes

full advantage of facilities (exhaust

fan, mirrors,

etc.).

Total: w=100

n= (n*w)=

Final Mark : (∑(n*w)

4×∑ 𝑤× 𝑥%):

SECTION E 2 E27

Comment:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :

SECTION E 1 E28



Criteria/Level CO PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

(w)

Ma

rk

s

(n)

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n=1 n=2 n=3 n=4

Demonstrates

ethical behavior in

professional

situations

Does not demonstrate

consistent ethical

behavior

Consistently

demonstrates ethical

behavior

Consistently

demonstrates ethical

behavior in self &

others

Consistently

demonstrates &

promotes ethical

behavior in self & others

Ability to build

good relationship,

interact with

others and work

effectively with

them to achieve the

same objective.

1. Cannot build good

relationship with

others.

1. Can build good

relationship with

others

1. Can build good

relationship with

others.

2. Can work with

others.

1. Can build good

relationship with others.

2. Can work with others.

3. Able to work

effectively.

Ability in giving

contribution to

plans and

coordinate team’s

output.

1. Not giving

contribution to group’s

plan.

2. Does not coordinate

team’s output.

1. Barely give

contribution to

group’s plan.

2. Barely coordinate

team’s output.

1. Always giving

contribution to

group’s plan.

2. Always

coordinate team’s

output.

1. Constantly giving

contribution to group’s

plan.

2. Constantly coordinate

team’s output.

Responds

appropriately to

feedback &

recommendations

Does not consistently

respond to feedback

& recommendations

in a positive manner

Barely responds

to feedback &

recommendations in

a positive manner

Consistently

responds

to feedback &

recommendations in

a positive manner

Consistently responds

to feedback &

recommendations in a

positive manner &

changes in behavior(s)

Ability to

understand effects

of environment

and socio-cultural

in professional

practice.

Does not demonstrate

sensitivity towards

effects of environment

and socio-cultural.

Barely demonstrate

sensitivity towards

effects of

environment and

socio-cultural.

Always demonstrate

sensitivity towards

effects of

environment and

socio-cultural.

Constantly demonstrate

sensitivity towards

effects of environment

and socio-cultural.

Ability to practice

ethical attitude and

have responsibility

towards the

society.

1. Does not

demonstrate ethical

behaviour

2. Not sensitive

towards responsibility

to the society.

1. Barely

demonstrate ethical

behaviour.

2. Less sensitive

towards

responsibility to the

society

1. Always

demonstrate ethical

behavior

2. Always sensitive

towards

responsibility to the

society

1.Demonstrate ethical

behaviour constantly

2. Constantly sensitive

towards responsibility to

the society.

Others (please

specify)

TOTAL

w n wn *

TOTAL MARKS ∑(n*w)

4×∑ wX x% =



Affective Rubrics (X%)

CT(QM) – FE – 02B(iv)



Project Title :

SECTION E 2 E28

Comment:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :

SECTION E 1 E29



Criteria/Level CO PO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

(w)

Ma

rk

s

(n)

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n=1 n=2 n=3 n=4

Curiosity Explores topic at a

superficial level, rarely

providing insight or

information beyond

the very basic facts.

Explores a topic

with some depth,

sometimes

providing insight

and rich

information.

Usually explores a

topic in depth, yielding

insight and/or

information suggesting

interest in the subject.

Consistently

explores a topic in

depth, yielding rich

insight information

indicating intense

passion for the

subject.

Motivation

Rarely seeks

opportunities to

expand knowledge,

skills, and abilities.

Sometimes seeks

opportunities to

expand knowledge,

skills, and

abilities.

Usually seeks

opportunities to

expand knowledge,

skills, and abilities.

Actively seeks

opportunities

to expand

knowledge, skills,

and abilities.

Independence Rarely asks questions

or seeks

information without

guidance from others.

Sometimes seeks

opportunities to

expand

knowledge, skills,

and abilities.

Usually presents

insights

without guidance from

others

Consistently

presents

meaningful insight

without guidance

from others.

Transfer Rarely synthesizes

previous learning and

skills into new

learning that enhances

comprehension and

performance in new

situations

Sometimes

synthesizes previous

learning and skills

into new learning

that enhances

comprehension and

performance in new

situations

Usually synthesizes

previous learning and

skills into new

learning that enhances

comprehension and

performance in new

situations

Consistently

synthesizes

previous learning

and skills into new

learning that

enhances

comprehension and

performance in new

situations

Reflection Examines or explores

an issue at a

superficial level, rarely

yielding clarified

meaning or indicating

a changed conceptual

perspective

Examines or

explores an issue

with some depth,

sometimes yielding

clarified meaning or

indicating a changed

conceptual

erspective

Internally examines

and explores an issue,

usually yielding

clarified meaning

and indicating a

changed conceptual

perspective

Internally examines

and explores an

issue, consistently

yielding clarified

meaning and

indicating a changed

conceptual

perspective

Others (please

specify)

TOTAL

w n wn *

TOTAL MARKS ∑(n*w)

4×∑ wX x% =



Lifelong Learning Skills (X%)

CT(QM) – FE – 02B(v)



Project Title :

SECTION E 2 E29

Comment:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :

SECTION E 1 E30



Comment:

Examined by

:

Signature

:

Date :



Project/ Assignment Rubric Template

CT(QM) – FE – 02B(vi)



Project Title :

Criteria PO CO

Marking Criteria

Weig

hta

ge

w

Ma

rk

n

To

tal

Mark

s

(n*

w)

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

Total:

w=

n= (n*w)=

Final Mark :

4

w)*(n:

Attachment B2 20XX/20XX

SECTION E

ATTACHMENTS

( Support Procedure)

PP (QM)(S) – FE

At Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

Fakulti KejuruteraanAttachment B2 20XX/20XX

SECTION E 1 E30

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13M(i)

KNSXXX – XXX Engineering

Dr A / Dr B

(Semester XXXX)

Assessment Methods CO PO

COGNITIVE

Bloom Taxonomy PSYCHOMOTOR

AFFECTIVE /

SOFT SKILLS Total

Knowledge /

Comprehension Application / Analysis Synthesis / Evaluation

Item Marks Item WP Marks Item WP Marks Item WP Marks Item WP/

EA Marks

Coursework

* Rows can

be added if

desired

Quiz

Project

Test(s) / Midterm

Final Exam

Summary

≤ 𝟏𝟓 ≥ 𝟐𝟓

CO PO %

1 CO 1 –

2 CO 2 –

3 CO 3 –

4 CO 4 –

The marks MUST be NOT MORE than 15% out of the total

marks. The remaining marks can be in Application/Analysis

or Synthesis/Evaluation as stated in the Course Plan.



SECTION E 1 E31

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13M(ii)

MODERATION OF COMPLEX ENGINEERING PROBLEM & COMPLEX ENGINEERING ACTIVITY

Course code & name : Session :

Lecturer :

Checklist Lecturers’ Declaration of Complex Engineering Moderator’s Comment

Course plan is attached Y / N Y / N

Bloom Taxonomy is attached Y / N Y / N

Question to be moderated is attached Y / N Y / N

Complex Engineering is applicable and

according to Course Plan.

Justification of Complex

Engineering/Keywords for each assessment **refer to Appendix CPS dan CEA

Y / N Y / N

a) Test 1

b) Test 2

c) Final Exam

d) Assignment/Project/PoPBL/PBL

Moderated by:

Name : _____________________________________________________ Signature : __________________________

Date : ____________________



SECTION E 2 E31

Appendix: CPS & CEA

Complex Problem Solving(CPS)

Attribute Complex Engineering Problem have characteristics WP1 and some or all of WP2 to WP7:

Depth of Knowledge WP1 – cannot be resolved without in-depth engineering knowledge at the level one or more of WK3, WK4, WK5, WK6 or

WK8 (below) which allows a fundamentals-based, first principles analytical approach

Range of conflicting requirements WP2 – involve wide-ranging or conflicting technical, engineering and other issues

Depth of analysis required WP3 – have no obvious solution and require abstract thinking, originality in analysis to formulate suitable models

Familiarity of issues WP4 – involve infrequently encountered issues

Extent of applicable codes WP5 – are outside problems encompassed by standards and codes of practice for professional engineering

Extent of stakeholder involvement and

conflicting requirements

WP6 – involve diverse groups of stakeholders with widely varying needs

Interdependance WP7 – are high level problems including many component parts or sub-problems

Complex Engineering Activities(CEA)

Attribute Complex Engineering Activities

Preamble Complex activities means (engineering) activities or projects that have some or all of the following characteristics:

Range of resources EA1: Involve the use of diverse resources (and for this purpose resources includes people, money, equipment, materials,

information and technologies)

Level of interactions EA2: Require resolution of significant problems arising from interactions between wide-ranging or conflicting technical,

engineering or other issues,

Innovation EA3: Involve creative use of engineering principles and research-based knowledge in novel ways.

Consequences to society and the

environment

EA4: Have significant consequences in a range of contexts, characterized by difficulty of prediction and mitigation

Familiarity EA5: Can extend beyond previous experiences by applying principles-based approaches


Fakulti Kejuruteraan tachment B2 20XX/20XX

SECTION E 1 E32 No. Edisi : 2.0

Semakan : 05 Tarikh kuatkuasa : 07/03/2017

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13M(iii)

BORANG MODERASI SOALAN PEPERIKSAAN AKHIR

A. MAKLUMAT KURSUS (Diisi oleh pensyarah)

a. Nama Pensyarah :

c. Kod Kursus :

b. Nama Jabatan :

d. Nama Kursus :

B. SEMAKAN SOALAN PEPERIKSAAN BERDASARKAN COURSE OUTCOME (CO) DAN TAHAP BLOOM’S TAXONOMY

BAHAGIAN I: Diisi Oleh Pensyarah Kursus BAHAGIAN II: Diisi Oleh Moderator

Bil. Course Outcome (CO) Soalan

Peperiksaan

Tahap

Bloom’s

Taxonomy*

Soalan menepati

CO

(Ya/Tidak/NA)

Komen

1 Solve the engineering problems related to stress, strain and deformation

under bending and various loading condition.

2 Analyze the beam and shaft problems under bending and various

loading condition.

3 Develop the solutions to problems associated with solid mechanics.

*Level of Bloom’s Taxonomy: C1 - Knowledge C2 - Comprehension C3 - Application C4 - Analysis C5 - Synthesis C6 - Evaluation

C. SEMAKAN FORMAT (Diisi oleh moderator)

a. Format dan maklumat muka depan

lengkap : Ya Tidak

b. Kesesuaian arahan di muka surat

hadapan kertas soalan : Ya Tidak

c. Skema jawapan dan markah boleh

diterima dan disertakan : Ya Tidak

d. Catatan/pembetulan dalam draf

kertas soalan atau lampiran

berasingan

: Ya Tidak

e. Komen-komen lain :

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

Fakulti Kejuruteraan Attachment B2 20XX/20XX

SECTION E 2 E32

D. PENYEMAKAN MODERATOR (EXPERT PANEL) SILA TANDAKAN KOMEN YANG BERKENAAN:

Pindaan perlu dibuat Tidak perlu pindaan

Pengesahan Moderator 1:

Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:


Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:

PENGESAHAN PENYEMAKAN (SEKIRANYA ADA PINDAAN):

Pindaan telah dibuat Perlu pindaan semula

Pengesahan Moderator:

Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:

PENGESAHAN PENERIMAAN OLEH PENYELARAS PROGRAM: (Untuk dibawa ke JK Moderasi Jabatan)

Tandatangan: Tarikh: Nama:

E. PENGESAHAN JAWATANKUASA MODERASI JABATAN SILA NYATAKAN KEPUTUSAN YANG TELAH DIBUAT:


Pengesahan AJK:




Pengesahan AJK:


F. PENGESAHAN TIMBALAN DEKAN (PRASISWAZAH)

Pengesahan Timbalan Dekan (Prasiswazah):

Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:



SECTION E 3 E32

SENARAI SEMAK KERTAS SOALAN PEPERIKSAAN AKHIR UNTUK UPFK


a. Nama Pensyarah :

b. Nama Jabatan :

c. Kod Kursus :

d. Nama Kursus :

e. Bilangan Calon :

f. Tempoh Peperiksaan :

g. Keperluan Pelajar Semasa Peperiksaan Akhir :

Bilangan Buku Jawapan : _____________ set.

(Nyatakan bilangan mukasurat diperlukan:_____________ / calon).

Bilangan Kertas Soalan : _____________ set; Bilangan mukasurat : _____________.

Kertas Lukisan : ____________ keping / calon.

Kertas Graf (Biasa atau Logaritma): ___________ keping / calon.

Kertas Draf : ___________ keping / calon.

h. Keperluan Tambahan Disediakan : Formula Carta Simbol

Jadual Data Definisi Manual

B. PENGESAHAN PENGHANTARAN DOKUMEN KE UPFK Penghantaran Dokumen ke UPFK:

Tandatangan (Penyelaras Kursus):

Tarikh:

Nama:

Pengesahan Oleh UPFK:

Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:

C. PENGESAHAN TIMBALAN DEKAN (PRASISWAZAH)

Pengesahan Timbalan Dekan (Prasiswazah):

Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:



SECTION E 4 E32

D. UNTUK KEGUNAAN UPFK

Senarai Semak :

1. Jumlah cetakan kertas soalan : ____________ set

2. Buku jawapan : ____________ set

3. Kertas lukisan : ____________ set

4. Kertas graf : ____________ set

5. Formula : ____________ set

6. Carta : ____________ set

7. Jadual Data : ____________ set

8. Takrifan : ____________ set

9. Simbol : ____________ set

10. Benang pengikat : ____________ set

11. Lain-lain : ____________ set

(________________________)

Penyemak 1:

Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:

Penyemak 2:

Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:

Disahkan oleh Penyelaras UPFK:

Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:



SECTION E 1 E33

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13M(iv)

BORANG MODERASI SOALAN UJIAN


a. Nama Pensyarah :

b. Kod Kursus :

c. Nama Jabatan :

d. d. Nama Kursus :

B. SEMAKAN SOALAN UJIAN BERDASARKAN COURSE OUTCOME (CO) DAN TAHAP BLOOM’S TAXONOMY

BAHAGIAN I: Diisi Oleh Pensyarah Kursus BAHAGIAN II: Diisi Oleh Moderator

Bil. Course Outcome (CO) Soalan

Peperiksaan

Tahap

Bloom’s

Taxonomy*

Soalan menepati

CO

(Ya/Tidak/NA)

Komen

*Level of Bloom’s Taxonomy: C1 - Knowledge C2 - Comprehension C3 - Application C4 - Analysis C5 - Synthesis C6 - Evaluation

C. SEMAKAN FORMAT (Diisi oleh moderator)

a. Skema jawapan dan markah boleh

diterima dan disertakan : Ya Tidak

f. Catatan/pembetulan dalam draf

kertas soalan atau lampiran

berasingan : Ya Tidak

b. Komen-komen lain :



SECTION E 2 E33

D. PENYEMAKAN MODERATOR (EXPERT PANEL) SILA TANDAKAN KOMEN YANG BERKENAAN:



Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:


Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:



Pengesahan Moderator:

Tandatangan:

Tarikh:

Nama:

PENGESAHAN PENERIMAAN OLEH PENYELARAS PROGRAM




SECTION E 1 E34

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 13M(v)

COURSE EVALUATION FORM

Course Code and Title

Lecturers’ Name

Remarks

Note: This form is to be filled at the END of the Semester, in reference to End Semester Report (ESR) analysis. This form will be

submitted together with the Course Plan for the next session. If the space is not enough, please use attachment.

INSTRUCTION: As a guideline, please consider the following question when filling in the form.

i. Is the delivery approaches for each COs and POs suitable?

ii. Is the assessment method for each COs and POs appropriate to measure the stated outcome?

iii. Are all questions given in the assessment taught in the class before the students sit for the assessment?

iv. Do the lecturers provide opportunity for the students to improve their outcomes achievement?

v. Do the examinations and key assignments provide the intended means of assessment?

PREVIOUS WEAKNESSES/ PROBLEMS/ COMMENTS

Sem/Session:

ACTION TO BE TAKEN / AMENDMENT TO BE DONE

Sem/Session:

1.

2.

3.

Prepared by:

..................................................

Date: ........................................

Agreed by:

...........................................................

Date:........................................

Approved by:

.....................................................

(Head of Department / Programme

Coordinator)

Date:.........................................

SECTION E 1 E35

ALUMNI TRACER STUDY


UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(i)

Dear Datuk/ Dr/ Mr/ Mrs,

Faculty of Engineering is in the process of gathering feedback from the faculty's alumni.

Please assist Faculty of Engineering by taking a few moments of your precious time to complete the survey.

As an alumnus, your opinions are valued and are utilized to help us make periodic changes and updates for

continuous program improvements. Please fill this form out to the best of your abilities. All responses will

be held strictly confidential.

Thank you for participating in this important process.

* Required

Full Name *

Year graduated *

(the year of your convocation at UNIMAS)

Mark only one oval.

o 2006

o 2007

o 2008

o 2009

o 2010

o 2011

o 2012

o 2013

o 2014

o 2015

Handphone number *

E-mail Address *

Facebook ID

SECTION E 2 E35

CURRENT EMPLOYMENT

Kindly provide your current employment information

Name of Company: *

Name of Employer: *

Employer's Contact No: *

Employer's Email: *

Address of Company: *

Position/ Affiliation (Assisstan Engr./ Maintenance Engr./ Executive etc) *

What is the nature of your current company’s business? Mark only one (1). *

Mark only one oval.

o Government Institution/ Agency

o Multinational/ International Firm

o Small & Medium Enterprises

o Semi-Government Institution/ Agency

o Private Limited

How long have you been working in the industry? *

Mark only one oval.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

years

Is your workplace a multiracial/ multiethnic company? *

Mark only one oval.

o Yes

o No

Is your workplace dealing with multinational companies? *

Mark only one oval.

o Yes

o No

SECTION E 3 E35

ADDITIONAL DEGREE OBTAINED/ ENROLLED, eg.:

Master/PhD (if any):

Please indicate whether you have obtained/ enrolled in additional degree (Master/ PhD).

Name of University *

Mark only one oval.

o UNIMAS

o Other local universities (UMS, UTM, Swinburne, UUM, USM etc)

o International universities

o None

Degree obtained/ enrolled *

Check all that apply.

o Master degree

o Doctorate (PhD)

o Post doctorate

o None

Graduating (or expected graduating) year:

PROFESSIONALISM:

Are you registered with Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM)*

Mark only one oval.

o Yes

o No

If YES please indicates your (BEM) number

Are you registered with other Professional Bodies? *

Mark only one oval.

o Yes

o No

Are you registered as Professional Engineer? (ir/CEng/ PEng) *

Mark only one oval.

o Yes

o No

If YES please indicates your Professional Engineer (ir/CEng/ PEng) number

SECTION E 4 E35

JOB RELEVANCY:

Are you working in an industry related to your engineering degree? *

Mark only one oval.

o Yes

o No

How closely related is your current job to your engineering degree? *

Mark only one oval.

1 2 3 4 5

Not Related Highly Related

LIFE LONG LEARNING:

Are you involved in research and development (R&D) activities? *

Mark only one oval.

o Yes

o No

Are you involved in Professional/ Technical courses/seminars/conferences? *

Mark only one oval.

o Yes

o No

If your answer to question is "Yes", please specify the average number of

courses/seminars/conferences you have attended per year. *

SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES & SOCIETY RELATED

ACTIVITIES:

Are you dealing with any project/task in which you need to consider sustainability issues

(environmental, social and economic aspects)? *

Mark only one oval.

o Yes

o No

Are you involved in any community service activities? *

(i.e: AJK Kampung, Kelab Pencinta Alam, MERCY, SACC, or other NGOs)

Mark only one oval.

o Yes

SECTION E 5 E35

o No

ETHICS

In a product/project review meeting attended by all the groups and the senior manager of the division,

there are possible errors in the design of one group that might cause some problem to the customers.

This is realized by an engineer of another group. Do you think that this engineer (representing

today’s engineer) should voluntarily comment during the meeting? *

Mark only one oval.

1 2 3 4 5

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

During a chat with a long known supplier, the engineer of a company was asked if he can disclose

the list of clients of his company to the supplier as his business is not doing very well which affects

his family wellbeing. Do you think that the engineer (representing today’s engineer) will disclose

that information? *

Mark only one oval.

1 2 3 4 5


There were 3 quotations that have fulfilled the requirement and specification but differ in prices. The

team responsible for deciding on the successful applicant felt that the best choice was the most

expensive quoted product/material as the price is just slightly higher than the other two and it comes

with personal gifts for all staff. This will be good since no bonus was given by the company last

year. Do today’s engineers accept this as a practice? * Mark only one oval.

1 2 3 4 5


SECTION E 6 E35

PART B: PROGRAMME OBJECTIVES (PEO)

Objectives for each department are listed in the following table. Please indicate the importance of

the item in your current position, and how well your education at Engineering Programme at

UNIMAS prepared you in this regard. Please select the most appropriate scale for each item.

UNIMAS preparation (UNIMAS Preparation requires you to rate how well have UNIMAS prepared

you in attaining the stated abilities).

Programme Name: _______________________________________________________

Mark only one oval per row.

*** PEO of

Department

Extremely

well prepared

Well

prepared

Slightly

prepared

Poorly

prepared Not prepared

Overall importance in your current position.

Mark only one oval per row.

*** PEO of

Department

Extremely

important Important

Slightly

important

Not

important

Not

Applicable/

Relevant

20XX

SECTION E 1 E36

EMPLOYER SURVEY



PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(ii)

INTRODUCTION

The Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) is in the process of gathering responses from its stakeholders on the curriculum and teaching methods. We would be very grateful if you could help us in completing this questionnaire. The purpose of this survey is to determine how well the university has prepared its graduates to meet their needs from an employer point of view, based on the Programme Objectives (PEO) aspects.

Note:

Programme Objectives (PEO) are statements that describe the attributes expected to be possessed three (3) to five (5) years after graduation.

Part A – COMPANY PROFILE (Please fill-up the information and tick (√) the relevant boxes)

i. Company’s Name :

ii. Company Address :

iii. Company Email :

iv. Company Phone Number

v. Employer/ Immediate Supervisor Name:

Contact No: Email Address:

vi. Type of Company vii. Total Number of Staff

Government Sector < 5 staff

Private Sector 5 – 20 staff

Others (Please specify): 20 -100 staff

100 - 500 staff

viii. Type of Industry 500 – 1000 staff

Agriculture > 1000 staff

Construction & Property Developers

Consultancy ix. Annual Sales Turn - Over

Education < RM 250,000

Information Technology & Communication RM 250,000 – RM 1 million

Law & Policy Making RM 1 million – RM 5 million

Manufacturing RM 5 million – RM 10 million

Oil & Gas RM 10 million – RM 25 million

Services > RM 25 million

Utilities & Power Supply

Others (Please specify): x. Current Work Field of UNIMAS Employee (can tick more

than one)

Mechanical Engineering

xi. Number of Employee from Faculty of Engineering, UNIMAS Manufacturing Engineering 1

- 2 Electronics Engineering

3 - 5 Electrical Engineering

6 - 10 Chemical Engineering

> 10 Civil Engineering

Others (Please specify):

Please Continue to Next Page

20XX

SECTION E 2 E36

Part B - EVALUATION ON ACHIEVEMENT OF PROGRAMME OBJECTIVES (PEO)

Please rate the performance of the Faculty of Engineering graduate(s) who is/ are currently working in your company. Please kindly provide his/ her achievement with reference to the listed programme objectives.

Degree Qualification:

Bachelor (Hons) in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering

Bachelor (Hons) in Civil Engineering

Bachelor (Hons) in Electrical and Electronics (Computer) Engineering

Bachelor (Hons) in Electrical and Electronics (Telecommunications) Engineering

Bachelor (Hons) in Chemical Engineering

Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) in Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Other:

Professionalism and ethics of the Engineering Profession.

No

Aspects of

PROGRAMME OBJECTIVES (PEO)

Statement Significance Employee Achievement

0 not relevant 1 very weak

2 weak

3 moderate

4 good

5 very good

1 Professionalism and ethics of the Engineering profession.

i. Ethical and Professional 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

ii. Ability to apply fundamental knowledge in engineering

profession

1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

iii. Capable of fulfilling the clients’ need 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

iv. Recognise his/ her responsibilities to the company and industry 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

v. Recognise his/ her responsibilities to the society to help in building a

cultured and more developed society

1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

2 Enhancement of learning and continuing education.

i. Ability to develop skills and seek research information from

multiple sources

1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

ii. Ability to perform innovative research 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

iii. Ability to apply Engineering knowledge to generate new knowledge and

satisfy the needs of stakeholder

1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

3 Multicultural harmony and unity.

i. Understand the working culture of different races and nations 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

ii. Ability to adapt himself/ herself to multiple working conditions 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

4 Possession of general education and understanding of global demand of engineering markets.

i. Possess competency in fundamental engineering knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

ii. Keep abreast with current technical skills 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

iii. Ability to promote himself/ herself in the industry nationally/

internationally

1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

5 Communication and interpersonal skills.

i. Has a good command of oral communication 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

ii. Ability to cooperate effectively in the team 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

Please Continue to Next Page

1 not important

2 marginally important

3 important

4 very important

5 extremely important

B2 20XX/ Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

Fakulti Kejuruteraan Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 3 E36

Faculty of Engineering UNIMAS would like to thank you for your willingness in spending time to complete this questionnaire. All these input and

suggestion will be used to perform the process of “Continuous Quality Improvement” (CQI) for our undergraduate programmes to ensure the

programme meets the current market needs.

After completing the form, please kindly mail, email or fax the form to;

Alumni Unit,

Faculty of Engineering

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak,

94300 Kota Samarahan

Kuching, Sarawak

Tel: 082 – 58 3264

Fax: 082 – 58 3410 (Attn to: Dr Nazeri Abd Rahman)

Email: [email protected]

~~ END OF SURVEY ~~

THANK YOU

If you have any suggestion to change or modify any of the above listed Programme Objectives,

we are very grateful if you can propose it in the space provided below. Please suggest any

alternate objectives if necessary and relevant to your industry.

mailto:[email protected]

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 1 E37

EXIT SURVEY



PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(iii)

INTRODUCTION The Faculty is interested in hearing about your educational experiences at UNIMAS ! Please complete this survey and return it to us at your convenience. Your responses will be combined with other graduates and be used to improve education at Faculty of Engineering, UNIMAS.

A. Background Information i. Gender: Female

Male

ii. Please identify your ethnic group: Malay Chinese India Others (Please specify): ____________________________

iii. At what academic level did you enter this

programme? STPM Matriculation Diploma Others (Please specify): ______________________________

iv. Please identify programme enrolled in Faculty: Civil Engineering

Electrical & Electronics Engineering Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Chemical Engineering

v. What is your current CGPA? 2.0 to 2.99

3.0 to 3.49 > 3.50

vi. Please include your email, Facebok ID, Instagram ID,

and Whatapps ID or any medium that enable Faculty to contact you at the future time

Email : Facebook ID : Instagram ID : Whatapps : Others :

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 2 E37

B. Education Experience:

Please answer the following questions that best describe your experiences as a student at Faculty of Engineering, UNIMAS.

1 2 3 4 5

Strongly not agree Not agree Slightly agree Agree Strongly agree

Education Experience Rating

i. The required math & science courses during tertiary education provided good preparation to my programme courses.

1 2 3 4 5

ii. Classrooms were conducive & adequate to support teaching and learning activities. 1 2 3 4 5

iii. The computer and laboratory equipment and facilities were satisfactory and adequate. 1 2 3 4 5

iv. Modern engineering tools were incorporated into my class and/or laboratory activities. 1 2 3 4 5

v. The course work required in my study met my expectation. 1 2 3 4 5

vi. Department academic advisors were available to help and they met my needs. 1 2 3 4 5

vii. Faculty was available for assistance with my educational process. 1 2 3 4 5

viii. The overall quality of teaching and learning activities in the programme was good. 1 2 3 4 5

ix. I am well prepared for employment in my field. 1 2 3 4 5

C. Outcomes of the Faculty of Engineering Programmes: Each programme has a list of 11 outcomes that describe knowledge graduates are expected to posses at the time of graduation. Please answer the following questions by selecting the level to which you have attained the following outcome as a result of your education development at Faculty of Engineering, UNIMAS.

1 2 3 4 5

Strongly not achieved Not achieved Slightly achieved Achieved Strongly achieved

Programme Outcomes Student Achievement PO 1 Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, natural science, engineering fundamentals and

an engineering specialisation 1 2 3 4 5

PO 2 Ability to identify, formulate, conduct research literature and analyse complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences

1 2 3 4 5

PO 3 Ability to design solutions for complex engineering problems and design systems, components or processes that meet specified needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety, cultural, societal, and environmental considerations

1 2 3 4 5

PO 4 Ability to conduct investigation of complex engineering problems using research -based knowledge (WK8) and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of information to provide valid conclusions

1 2 3 4 5

PO 5 Ability to create, select and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools, including prediction and modelling, to complex engineering problems, with an understanding of the limitations.

1 2 3 4 5

PO 6 Ability to apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice and solutions to complex engineering problems.

1 2 3 4 5

PO 7 Ability to understand and evaluate the sustainability and impact of professional engineering work in the solutions of complex engineering problems in societal and environmental contexts.

1 2 3 4 5

PO 8 Ability to apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of engineering practice

1 2 3 4 5

PO 9 Ability to function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings

1 2 3 4 5

PO 10 Ability to communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions

1 2 3 4 5

PO 11 Ability to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering management principles and economic decisionmaking and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects in multidisciplinary environments

1 2 3 4 5

PO 12 Ability to recognise the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.

1 2 3 4 5

D. Your Plan and Miscellaneous Information

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 3 E37

i. Do you currently have job offer/offers: Yes

No

ii. Do you plan to further your studies to postgraduate level (full-time/part-time)?

Yes No

iii. Are you a student member of any other professional body?

(e.g. IEEE/BEM/IEM) Yes (Please specify):

______________________ No

iv. Do you plan to become a professionally registered engineer

in future? Yes No

v. Where do you see yourself 10 years from now? Professional Practice

Engineering Management Teaching/Research Business/Contractor Others (Please specify): ___________________

vi. I would definitely recommend the programme to others: Yes

No

Thank you for your time and cooperation.

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 2 E38

Borang KNF3065-D

INDUSTRIAL TRAINING SURVEY


UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA SARAWAK

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(iv)

The faculty would like to thank you for your willingness to participate in our Industrial Training Survey. The main objectives of this

survey are (i) to evaluate UNIMAS students’ performance from the industrial point of view (ii) to get feedbacks from the industries to

further improve the relevance and quality of the programme. All your personal information and responses will be kept confidential and

the outcome from this survey will be used solely to improve our undergraduate programme.

Your cooperation in this survey is highly appreciated.

Part A: Personal Information (Please fill-up the information and tick the relevant boxes)

i. Name: ___________________________________

ii. Job title :__________________________________

iii. Institution or Company Address :

Tel. No.: ____________________________ Fax. No.:____________________________

iv. Nature of business;

Government Institution

Semi-Government Institution/Company

Multinational Firm

Private Limited

Small and Medium Enterprise

Other (please specify):__________________

v. How long have you been working in the industry? ________ year(s)

Please continue to the next page.

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 3 E38

Part B: Trainee Evaluation (please circle the most suitable)

From your own experience and considerations of the needs of the industry, please rate UNIMAS trainee with respect to the following

aspects based on their performance.

How do you rate UNIMAS trainee?

Ability

1 2 3 4 5

Strongly disagree Slightly disagree Slightly agree Agree Strongly agree

No. Aspects Rating

1. Applying his/her knowledge of mathematics and science to complete

any given tasks. 1 2 3 4 5

2. Ability to Conduct experiments related to the field of work as well as to

analyze and interpret data. 1 2 3 4 5

3. Understand the impact of engineering solutions to the community.

1 2 3 4 5

4. Understandings of professionalism and ethical responsibility in work

place. 1 2 3 4 5

5. Effective communication with fellow engineering cohorts as well as the

community at large. 1 2 3 4 5

6. Ability to identify and finding solutions for engineering related

problems. 1 2 3 4 5

7. Ability to utilize the technology and modern engineering tools to

identify and solve complex engineering problem 1 2 3 4 5

8. Recognize the need to embark in life-long learning and acquiring new

knowledge. 1 2 3 4 5

9. Time and project management. 1 2 3 4 5

10. Designing a system or process to produce desired output. 1 2 3 4 5

11. Enriched with knowledge of contemporary issues and sustainability. 1 2 3 4 5

12. Ability to exploit techniques, skills and modern engineering tools

necessary towards improving self and work performance. 1 2 3 4 5

13. Functioning in multi-disciplinary team. 1 2 3 4 5

14. Entrepreneurship skill and its financing aspects. 1 2 3 4 5

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 4 E38

Suggestion for improvement (if any):

End of Survey

Thank You

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 1 E39

Department:

Details of External Examiner

Name:

Designation:

Institution / Organization:

Date of Visit:

The faculty would like to give the greatest appreciation for your willingness to participate in our external

examiner report. The main objective of this survey is to assess the importance and relevancy of our curriculum

to our students’ career developments.

PART A: PROGRAMME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (PEO)

Please indicate the relevancy of PEO. Please rate the following outcomes as listed below:

Not Relevant Relevant Not applicable

1 2 3

Program

Educational

Objective

(PEO)

Rating Comment on the PEO

(Relevancy of PEO and Measurable depth)

PEO 1

PEO 2

PEO 3

PEO 4

PART B: PROGRAMME OUTCOMES (PO)

The faculty aspires to develop future engineers with the following outcomes. Please rate the following outcomes

according to their representation of importance to the industry. The rating scales are as listed below:

Not Relevant Not Important Slightly Important Important Extremely Important

1 2 3 4 5

Program

Outcomes

Rating Comment on the PO

(Suitability & importance of the PO to the current engineering need/

market)

PO1

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO 11

PO12


Report from External Examiner

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(v)

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 2 E39

PART C: ACADEMIC CURRICULUM

Please department prepares the curriculum to student to satisfy industrial needs. Please rate the overall flow of the

content of all subjects offered.

1. Please rate on our program structure (cover the

broad area of their respective discipline)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Do you have any comment or suggestion to improve

the existing program structure?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

2. Please rate our course content. The courses

provide breadth and depth of knowledge in

respective disciplines

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor


the course content?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

3. Program delivery (Teaching and Learning)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor


the existing program delivery?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

4. The quality of assessment Method (Assess

intended outcomes)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor


the assessment method?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

5. Laboratory

(1) Fully opened ended

(2) Partially open ended

Comment if any;

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 3 E39

PART D: EVALUATION OF EXAMINATION/TEST/PRESENTATION

1. Quality/standard of question

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

2. PO Achievement of students (End Semester

Report)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

4. The quality of rubrics ( quantitative

assessment)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Do you have any suggestion to improve the rubrics?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

PART E: STUDENTS

1. Student’s workload

(1) Not enough

(2) Adequate

(3) Too many

2. Involvement of students in legal students’ organization and non-

academic activities (sports)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 4 E39

PART F: ACADEMIC AND SUPPORT STAFF

ACADEMIC STAFF

1. Percentage of staff are PhD holder

(1) >70%

(2) 50-69%

(3) 30-49%

(4) <30%

2. Teaching load/contact hour per Semester

(1) Not enough

(2) Adequate

(3) Too many

3. Staff to student Ratio

(1) Less than 1:15

(2) 1:20 – 1:15

(3) More than 1:20

4. Involvement lecturer/invited speaker from industry/public bodies in

courses

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

SUPPORT STAFF LABORATORY & ADMINISTRATION

1. Sufficient, qualified, experienced technical & administrative staff

supporting the programme (More than 10 years’ experience)

(1) >80%

(2) 60-70%

(3) <60%

2. Support Staff – Adequacy

(1) 1 Staff to 1 Lab

(2) 1 Staff to 2 Labs

(3) 1 Staff to more than 2 Labs

3. Establishment of working system for student feedback

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 5 E39

STAFF DEVELOPMENT/ ASSESMENT

1. Clear policy & plan for staff development (academic and

support)

(1) Yes

(2) No

(3) Uncertain (Please comment)

Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

2. Process in place for research funding, conference, training

sabbatical leave, industrial attachment, technical training

etc.

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

3. The university provides financial support for further study

(Masters, PhD.)

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

4. The university provides flexible hours to enable staff to

participate in professional activities, consultancy, research

etc.

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

5. The university provides financial support for professional

membership

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

6. The university Provides a systematic process for staff

yearly appraisal

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 6 E39

7. Is there established working system for student feedback?

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

PART G: PHYSICAL FACILITIES TO SUPPORT TEACHING AND RESEARCH

1. The number of classrooms and study areas

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

2.

Good Information Resources (Library)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

3. Computing and information technology systems (PC

and student ratio)

(1) Less than 1:10

(2) 1:20 – 1:10

(3) More than 1:20

4. Enough laboratories and workshops (equipment and

student ratio)

(1) Less than 1:5

(2) 1:5

(3) >1:5

5. The university provides associate equipment to cater

for multi delivery modes (blended learning).

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 1 E40

Department:

Details of Industrial Advisory Panel

Name:

Designation:

Institution / Organization:

Date of Visit:

The faculty would like to give the greatest appreciation for your willingness to participate in our external

examiner report. The main objective of this survey is to assess the importance and relevancy of our curriculum

to our students’ career developments.

PART A: PROGRAMME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (PEO)

Please indicate the relevancy of PEO. Please rate the following outcomes as listed below:

Not Relevant Relevant Not applicable

1 2 3

Program

Educational

Objective

(PEO)

Rating Comment on the PEO

(Relevancy of PEO and Measurable depth)

PEO 1

PEO 2

PEO 3

PEO 4

PART B: PROGRAMME OUTCOMES (PO)

The faculty aspires to develop future engineers with the following outcomes. Please rate the following outcomes

according to their representation of importance to the industry. The rating scales are as listed below:

Not Relevant Not Important Slightly Important Important Extremely Important

1 2 3 4 5

Program

Outcomes

Rating Comment on the PO

(Suitability & importance of the PO to the current engineering need/

market)

PO1

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO 11

PO12


Report from Industrial Advisory Panel

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(vi)

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 2 E40

PART C: ACADEMIC CURRICULUM

Please department prepares the curriculum to student to satisfy industrial needs. Please rate the overall flow of the

content of all subjects offered.

1. Please rate on our program structure (cover the

broad area of their respective discipline)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Do you have any suggestion to improve the existing

program structure?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

2. Please rate our course content. The courses

provide breadth and depth of knowledge in

respective disciplines

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Do you have any suggestion to improve the course

content?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

3. Program delivery (Teaching and Learning)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Do you have any suggestion to improve the existing

program delivery?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

4. Assessment Method (Assess intended

outcomes)

(1) Yes

(2) No

(3) Uncertain

Do you have any comment on the assessment

method?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

5. Laboratory

(1) Fully open ended

(2) Partially open ended

Do you have any suggestion to improve the teaching

lab?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 3 E40

PART D: EVALUATION OF EXAMINATION/TEST/PRESENTATION

1. Quality/standard of question

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Do you have any comment on quality and standard of

examination questions?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

2. PO Achievement of students (End Semester

Report)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Do you have any comment on PO achievement of

students?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

4. The quality of rubrics ( quantitative

assessment)

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Do you have any suggestion to improve the rubrics?

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

PART E: ACADEMIC AND SUPPORT STAFF

ACADEMIC STAFF

1. Competency of academic staffs

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

2. Involvement lecturer/invited speaker from

industry/public bodies in courses

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

SUPPORT STAFF LABORATORY & ADMINISTRATION

1. Sufficient, qualified, experienced technical & administrative staff

supporting the programme (More than 10 years’ experience)

(1) >80%

(2) 60-70%

(3) <60%

2. Support Staff – Adequacy

(1) 1 Staff to 1 Lab

(2) 1 Staff to 2 Labs

(3) 1 Staff to more than 2 Labs

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 4 E40

STAFF DEVELOPMENT/ ASSESMENT

1. Clear policy & plan for staff development (academic and

support)

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

2. Process in place for research funding, conference, training

sabbatical leave, industrial attachment, technical training

etc.

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

3. The university provides financial support for further study

(Masters, PhD.)

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

4. Flexible hours to enable staff to participate in professional

activities, consultancy, research etc.

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

5. The university provides financial support for professional

membership

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

6. The university has a systematic process for staff yearly

appraisal

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

7. Is there established working system for student feedback?

(1) Yes

(2) No


Comment:

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 5 E40

PART F: PHYSICAL FACILITIES TO SUPPORT TEACHING AND RESEARCH

1. The laboratory facilities satisfy industry’s needs.

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Do you have any suggestion or comment on

the lab facilities?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

2. The university provides associate equipment to cater

for multi delivery modes (blended learning).

(1) Excellent

(2) Satisfactory

(3) Poor

Do you have any suggestion or comment on

the associate equipment to cater for multi

delivery modes?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 1 E41

BORANG KNF3065-E

FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN


KNF3065 Latihan Industri

Industrial Training Supervisor Report

Note:

a. This form must be completed by Industrial Training Supervisor at the Industry after the student has

completed the training attachment.

b. Please post or fax or email the completed form within 7 days after the student has completed the

training to the following address

Industrial Training Coordinator

Faculty of Engineering


94300 Kota Samarahan

Sarawak

Tel:+6-082-583344

Fax:+6-082-583410

1. Student Name:

2. Study Programme:

3. Training Start Date:

4. Training Finish Date:

5. Length of Training: weeks

6. Organization Name and Address:

Tel:

Fax:

PP (QM)(S) – FE – 08H(vii)

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 2 E41

7. Please list three engineering aspects in which have been exposed to the student:

Exposure

i. ( %)

ii. ( %)

iii. ( %)

8. Overall industrial training evaluation (Please rate the student from 1 to 5):

Extremely Poor Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

a. Proficiency f. Attendance

b. Work quality g. Punctuality

c. Engineering problem-solving

skills

h. Interrelationship with supervisor

d. Knowledgeability i. Communication ability

e. Interrelationship with co-worker j. Cooperativeness during training

Total

9. Please provide some comments or opinions with regard to this industrial training for future

improvement.

10. Name of Industrial Training Supervisor:

Email of Industrial Training Supervisor:

Signature

Date Organization Official Name and Stamp

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 1 E42

BORANG KNF3065-F

FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN


KNF3065 Industrial Training

UNIMAS Industrial Training Supervisor Monitoring Report

Note:

a. This form must be completed by the visiting Supervisor from Faculty of Engineering, UNIMAS.

b. Please submit the completed form to the respective Departmental Industrial Coordinator from Faculty

of Engineering, UNIMAS within 7 days after the visit have been conducted.

1. Student Name:

2. Study Programme:

3. Visiting Date: 4. Time:

5. Training Organization Name and

Address:

6. Supervisor Name:

7. Organization Main Activities:

Attachment 20XX

SECTION E 2 E42

Please use the following measurements and criteria to evaluate items 8 and 9:

Extremely Poor Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

8. Organization Assessment:

- Company related to the student’s study programme

- Student exposure to company’s activities

9. Student Progress:

10. Is there any immediate action need to be undertaken by the Faculty:

None Yes

(Please elaborate below)

Signature Date

Name