17

Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 2: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 3: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 4: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 5: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 6: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 7: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 8: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 9: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 10: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 11: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 12: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 13: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 14: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 15: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 16: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought
Page 17: Eyewitness Identification Research Laboratory R. S... · 2007-12-17 · On the face of it (sorry) there was something discriminatory about this test when given to blacks. We thought