Upload
hakhanh
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BN3101 Project Outline
• Clinical problem and needs• Anatomy of hand/finger
• Clinical Background
• Current Methods of treatment
• Unmet needs/gaps
• Robotic Exoskeleton Hands: review
• Project• Definition
• User Specifications
• IP Search
• ASTM standards
Clinical problem and needs
Anatomy of hand/finger• Bones and joints
− 19 bones and 14 joints distal to the carpals;
− Thumb: 1 metacarpal and 2 phalanges; Others: 1 metacarpal
and 3 phalanges;
− Flexion : DIP ~ 90°; PIP ~ 110°; MCP ~ 90°;
− 20 degrees of freedom(DOFs) totally.
• Muscles
− 9 extrinsic muscles: contribute to finger flexion(3), the
extension of the fingers(5) and the abduction of the thumb(1).
− Intrinsic muscles: The dorsal interossei (DI) and the palmar
interossei (PI): flex the MCP joint and extend the PIP and
DIP joints.
• Tendons and Ligaments
− Extracapsular ligaments: TIML
− Capsular ligaments: MCP joint ligaments; the PIP and DIP
joint collateral ligaments.
Clinical problem and needs
Clinical Background
• Injuries of the hand or surgery
• In stroke survivors, hand function is often lost due to flexor and weakness in finger extensors;
• Spinal cord and other local injuries often lead to partial paralysis.
Clinical problem and needs
Current methods of treatment
• Currently only simple machines are available, prevent agglutination or adhesion of the involved tissue.
• The use of a functional electrical stimulation (FES)
system to stimulate muscles that are no longer
receiving signals from the central nervous system.
Clinical problem and needs
Unmet needs/gaps
• Simple Machines:
‐ Flexibility of these devices is limited;
‐ Not assist as needed
‐ Support only few independent DOFs
‐ Rare sensor feedback
‐ Time-consuming and labor-intensive, making the process expensive.
• FES:
‐ Fast fatigue;
‐ Not applicable to subjects with inflicted local trauma to the muscles.
Classification:
‒ Actuator type
‒ Purpose
‒ Intention sensing method
‒ Power transmission
Robotic Exoskeleton Hands: review
Robotic Exoskeleton Hands: review
a) Direct matching of joint centers b) Linkage for remote center of rotation c) Redundant linkage structure
d) Tendon-driven mechanism e) C=Bending actuator attached to the joint f) Serial linkage attached to distal segment
Mechanisms
Actuator technologies
• Conventional exoskeleton actuators‐ Electric motor: easily available, reliable and easy to
control/larger volume and weight;
‐ Pneumatic actuator: flexibility, fast responsibility/bulky and noisy;
• Smart material actuators‐ Shape memory alloy(SMA): high power-to-weight
ratio/nonlinearity;
‐ Electroactive polymer(EAP): light weight, flexibility and low power consumption/Slow response and low actuation force;
Robotic Exoskeleton Hands: review
Intention sensing methods
• Force Sensing
• Motion Sensing
• Breath Switch
• Surface Electromyogrofhy (sEMG)
• Muscle Hardness
• Mechanomyography (MMG)
• Photoplethysmography (PPG) at Fingernail
• Finger-pad Deformation
• Pressure Pattern(Force Myography, FMG)
Robotic Exoskeleton Hands: review
Reference Force transmission DOFIntention sensing
methodNote
Rehabilitation exoskeleton driven by passive actuator
HandSOME (Brokaw et al.) Linkage 1Exert extension torque for compensating finger flexor
hypertonia
Rehabilitation exoskeletons driven by electric actuators
WaveFlex (Otto Bock) Linkage 1 CPM
Kinetec Maestra Portable Hand
CPM (Patterson Medical)Linkage 1 CPM
Mulas et al Cable 2 EMG Active control
Tong et al Linear actuator 5 EMG CPM / Active motion
HEXOSYS (Iqbal et al.) Linkage 2 Underactuated
HEXORR (Schabowsky et al.) Linkage 2 Torque sensor CPM / Active motion
HANDEXOS (Chiri et al.) Cable, crank-slider 5 Underactuated
Wege et al. Cable 20 EMG electrode Active motion
Ueki et al. Linkage 18Joint angles of healthy
handSelf-motion control
iHandRehab (Li et al.) Cable 8 Force sensor CPM / Active motion
Sarakglou et al. Cable 7 Virtual reality exerciser
AFX (Jones et al.) Cable, linkage 3
IntelliArm (Ren et al.) Linkage1 for
handPassive / assistive
Rehabilitation exoskeletons driven by pneumatic actuators
Hand Mentor (Kinetic Muscles) Linkage 1 Passive / assistive
HWARD (Takahashi et al.) Linkage 3 Assistive
Wu et al. Cable, linkage 2 Force sensor Assistive
Reference Force transmission DOFIntention sensing
methodNote
Assistive exoskeletons driven by electric actuators
Martinez et al. Cable 3 FSR Underactuated Passive extension
OHAE (Baker et al.) Cable 3 FSR Underactuated
Hasegawa et al. Cable 11 EMG Finger tracking for back-drivability
In et al. Cable attached to glove 1 EMG Underactuated Passive extension
In et al. Cable attached to glove 1 Underactuated Passive extension, Differential mechanism
Shields et al. Cable, linkage 3 Force sensors Passive extension
SkilMate (Yamada et
al.)Steel belt 3 Joint angle Equipped with tactile sensor at fingertip
Benjuya et al. Flexible shaft 1 EMG
Assistive exoskeletons driven by pneumatic actuators
DiCicco et al. Cable, linkage 2 EMG Passive extension
Sasaki et al. Directly attached to glove 6Expiration switch or
tactile sensorUnderactuated Passive extension
Kadowaki et al. Directly attached to glove 6 Flexion angle or EMG Underactuated
Tadano et al. Directly attached to glove 5 Force sensor Underactuated Passive extension
Takagi et al. Linkage 3 Bending sensor Passive extension
Toya et al. Directly attached to glove 4Estimate from
movement patternPassive extension
Moromugi et al. Linkage 1Muscle hardness
sensor
Assistive exoskeleton driven by shape memory alloy
Makaran et al. Linkage 1Sip-and-puff switch or
EMGPassive extension
1) Rehabilitation exoskeleton driven by
passive actuator
HandSOME
• Assisting stroke survivors with hypertonia to regain functional grasp ability;
• A 4 bar linkage mechanism was designed.;
• Following the normal kinematic trajectory of the hand;
• The torque profile can be adjusted.
2) Rehabilitation exoskeletons driven by
electric actuators
Wege et al.• focus on support of the rehabilitation
process after hand injuries or strokes
• 20 finger joints, four for each finger;
• Hall sensors, optical encoders, force
sensors, surface electromyograph sensors;
3) Rehabilitation exoskeletons driven by
pneumatic actuators
HWARD(Takahashi et al.)
• Exercises flexion and extension of the hand and wrist;
• Three double-acting cylinders are used(Two for the finger, one for the wrist);
• Force sensors and position sensors.
4) Assistive exoskeletons driven by electric
actuators
Hasegawa et al.
• A dual sensing system, supporting human hand and wrist activities by using user’s bioelectric potential;
• six DC motors are mounted on wearer’s backhand;
• A thumb is assisted by exoskeleton with two motors.
• A five-parallel-link mechanism is used to support six wrist joint motions in three degrees of freedom;
5) Assistive exoskeletons driven by pneumatic
actuators
Dicicco et al.
• An aluminum anchoring plate mounted to the back of the hand and three aluminum bands, one for each of the finger bones.
• They were pulled by a pneumatic cylinder acting in compression;
• Electromyography (EMG) signals are used to control the exoskeleton’s movement.
6) Assistive exoskeleton driven by shape
memory alloy
• Makaran et al.
• It provides a new grasping function for quadriplegic patients.
• Shape memory alloy(SMA) actuators are used.
Custom hinged finger orthoses < $100 per finger
Exoskeleton Robotic Finger Orthosis - Biorobotics Research LabReference: http://www.medgadget.com/2015/10/a-low-cost-3d-printed-finger-continuous-passive-motion-device-video.html
Exoskeleton Hand Robotic Training Devicehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGadOXHO624
3D Printed Powered Exoskeletonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM2hydbs8d8
Robotic 'Wearable ExoSkeleton Hand'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lgb1x7P3Anw
Hand Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation of Stroke Patienthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Avt_3gJ8ddA
More videos online
You can also search a lot of them…
http://bioeng.nus.edu.sg/mm/bn3101/
Project
General requirements
• Design a hand exoskeleton, with 3 fingers or more
• New mechanisms, sensors/actuators recommended
• You can refer but do beyond the exist robots
• Has grasping function for patients or teleoperation function as a wearable device
Hints FYI at starting point
• Literature review • Gaps between engineering SOA & unmet clinical needs
• Back-drivable?
• # of controllable DOFs?• bending + manipulation?
• Bending actuation mechanisms?• Soft, Ni-Ti elastic backbone, Tendon-driven, Shaft, or others?
• Materials• Soft silicon?
• Thermo-elastomer? 3D printable?
• Make it simple or complicated?
Expectations
1. Minimum / bottom-line
• Concept development and show it mechanically feasible
• Basic modeling, characterization
2. Bonus (only this if you are good enough for 1)
• Control electronics
• System
• bilateral-operation
• Advanced modeling
Concept! Concept! Concept!
Easy to fabricate
Facility supports from lab
• Vacuum
• Centrifuge
• 3D printer (rough prototyping)
• Components/consumables if any
Q & A
• Weekly Update/Tutorial• Mon 10AM: Brief written updates: work done, problems, plan
• Weekly QA hours• Fri afternoon: EA-05-30 (my office) or by appointment• 66012802 / 85788427
• Open for social networks, data sharing• LinkedIn, Facebook, dropbox/onedrive preferred• ID: [email protected]
• In general reply in 24 hours and call me if not (I may miss messages from hundreds daily)
Lab tour: Flexible robotic manipulators
in our research group
• Soft mechatronics for oral and nasal
• Tubular continuum manipulator
• Cable/tendon/shaft driven
• SMA Shape memory alloy based
Prototype demo
More from lab web:• http://bioeng.nus.edu.sg/mm/bn3101/