EVOLVING CIVILISATIONS: PART IOctober, 2008

Noel Huntley

What may come as a surprise is that evolution is more a matter of physics andcomputers than biology. However, we are not interested here in a quantitativeanalysis of developments within the race, but more the qualitative and experientialside.

Regarding our particular civilisation in its current condition, it doesn't take a keenperception to recognise the chaos and turmoil this planet is in. Most people havedeveloped, and become accustomed to, an educational belief system that thiscondition is to be expected in a complex world such as ours, and quite normal.

We are pointing out that our civilisation is in an extreme or abnormal path of evolutionsuch that it is mainly devolution. This can be considered to be a non-harmonicevolution. Imagine at the other extreme a world which evolves along a harmonic pathof probabilities: nature devoid of carnivorous creatures, etc., and harmonictechnologies having been invented in the early stages of scientific development. Thiswould be a natural, harmonic evolution. However, to proceed with the different stagesof development of a civilisation we can appropriately use our civilisation at its presentstage of evolution and show what could be expected if the race began a continuousrecovery of its current desperate plight.

At present, based on science and education we have an extremely materialisticexistence with mainstream knowledge claiming: man from ape, and brain/bodytheories; the Big Bang, in which the universe (of very high-order design) sprung froman explosion and randomness; no continuous life after death of the physical body;purely quantitative evaluations of life, mind and the universe, and not truly qualitativewith a recognition of unity (or macro quantum states), etc.

The current status of our planet is one in which there is severe abuse of nature andresources, there is excessive use and misuse of force manifesting in human control,excessive laws and enforcement, egocentric conditions and non-harmonictechnologies (which are force technologies, giving pollution, dangerous energies tonature, inefficiencies of energy generation and shortage of energy supplies).

A significant step forward in our evolution would be an increase in respect for otherlife forms. This is inevitable if the race is evolving along a path of higher intelligenceand integration, greater sanity and alignment. Clearly all killing would eventuallycease. Wild carnivorous creatures would be removed, say, to another planet. In anadvanced civilisation, or one that had evolved harmonically from the beginning, therewould not be, and would never have been, carnivorous creatures. Food would bevegetarian with healthy artificial additions. At some point, all food would no longer be

Article Source: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~noelh/Evolving%20civilisations.htm

cooked since heat destroys valuable nutrients.

Around this level of development there would be a gradual dwindling of medicaltreatment and reducing enforcement through laws. People would attain completesanity and perfect health. There would follow a society without the need of money,government, police or military. There would eventually be no laws required sinceevery person would be responsible and follow their own natural spiritual ethics.Everyone would have a sufficiently developed perception to be aware of another'sviewpoint and how they feel---and thus couldn't harm anyone. Nor would one wish togain at another's expense. Physics would clarify the law of karma and show clearlyhow negative acts divide the unity of energies into a polarity, creating an imbalanceas the perpetrator acts entirely from his or her own viewpoint (blocks off the other),but causing an eventual reversal of this to occur through the natural laws of physics ofthe universe (what one puts out returns to one to balance polarity and restore unity).Continuous life beyond physical death would be elementary knowledge withinscience. No monetary system would be required since different individuals or groupswould be interested in producing a useful product that would be available free. No onewould be greedy or selfish. Committee meetings would be convened to handle any'government' projects.

Competition, sports and athletics as we know it would peter out. Not only would noone be interested in beating other people but mental and mind abilities wouldsupersede physical abilities, for example, through levitation and eventuallyteleportation, etc. At a further stage of development, a reverence for life would includeplants, and only fruits or vegetables which could be picked from trees would be eaten---this doesn't kill the tree (of course this may seem like nonsense to our more barbaricway of thinking). However, this stage might be swiftly passed through or bypassed asthe species develops a reverence for all creation.

By now the members of the race will be breatharians---a re-structuring of the bodyand genetics which allows the humans to bypass the solid foods created by the Sunand breath in the Sun's radiant energies directly. Yogis have long since called suchenergy, prana. Now a reverence for all creation would include every atom. All naturalentities, including whole planets or galaxies will be recognised as being intelligent andconscious, and made up of the same basic particles, units of consciousness (billionsof times smaller than subatomic particles). The (scientific) reader is reminded thatabout 40 years ago leading quantum physicist, professor David Bohm, concluded thatsuch entities as a planet/galaxy were undivided wholes (single quantum states ofenergy of complete unity), but ignored.

At this level of advancement, that is, a reverence for all creation and beingbreatharians, there would be no waste, not just from food but even 'construction'.Thought, or more easily, sound frequencies, could shape any desired item. If say, one

wished to 'dig' a hole in the ground, certain sounds/harmonies would spontaneouslyand automatically achieve the result. Homes could be built this way, and objectslevitated. Such a level of evolution would also manifest a totally positive synchronisticexistence. The collective of the species would be fully integrated and holographic andeach individual would be tuned to this state. That means the information of the wholeand its infinite computations would be available spontaneously and automatically toeach individual, not necessarily consciously. This means everyone would be in theright place at the right time, would meet the right people, make the right decisions,and no events would occur to cause injury, unless one wished this.

Unnatural and artificial systems have a basis in genetic mutations. What we arealluding to here is that our abnormal evolutionary condition is due to race mutations,making a recovery to natural harmonic conditions based on original harmonic non-mutated blueprints, a very difficult task, compared with an evolution free fromnegative interferences in the first stages. This will become evident when geneticistsdiscover what the so-called junk DNA is. Over 90% of all DNAs on this planet is notunderstood. The base pairs have broken off. Unfortunately when the first geneticistdiscovers these advanced mutations, instead of receiving a Nobel prize, they will beridiculed, attacked, and the discovery will be a bigger cover-up than the UFO scene.

Let us finalise this brief study of an evolving civilisation with a reference to thesymbiosis of technology and consciousness. Such a relationship is not observable inour existence because of the imbalance. Nevertheless the effect is present; acollective consciousness which is chaotic and fragmented will develop negative andnon-harmonic technologies. And vice versa, negative technologies will contributetowards bringing down consciousness. Ideally, technology is supposed to be anextension of mind/consciousness. It is not supposed to impede the development ofconsciousness or replace it. Abilities within the species should develop, replacingtechnologies and at the same time more refined and advanced sciences utilised as anaid to the expanding consciousness.

Return to Home Page

EVOLVING CIVILISATIONS: PART IIOctober, 2008N. Huntley

For our particular civilisation, where it went astray was in the over-emphasis of theintellectual faculty (left brain) and neglect of intuition/imagination, creative abilities(right brain). One could trace that at some early point in more recent evolutionarystages it was necessary to bring in the left-brain quantitative abilities: analysis, logical,rational; in other words, the intellect. To achieve this, the early over-reliance oninstinctive/intuition faculties would need to be subdued to allow the intellect to takehold and develop sufficiently to enable problems of more advanced life and survival tobe solved, in addition to evolving ultimately the higher-reasoning mind. Unfortunatelydue to interferences, manipulations and subsequently mutations (other articles havedealt with this) not enough intuition (say, for instance 10%) was retained to enable theintellectual mind to maintain (through this portion of intuition) an acceptance andunderstanding of the right-brain characteristics: emotion, intuition, perception ofwholeness, qualitative states.

As a result of this over-emphasis on intellect, the latter became too isolated, formingits own egotistical state, and believed it could understand all, and that the emotions,intuition, even the imagination were a handicap. Unfortunately the intellect in isolationcan never be the higher reasoning mind; it is a 3D machine which gets lost in its ownintellectualisations. The precise reason for this is that in such a system (devoid ofintuition), the point of thought and evaluation is inside the intellectual system underconsideration. The intellect (on its own) is context-dependent. Without intuition itcannot take on a zero point of perception---a point of inspiration (creativity). This isthe same as in scientific methodology in which quantum physics, 60 or so years ago,revealed that the observer (doing the experiment) is not outside the system (or trulyobjective) but part of it and that what the observer is, determines what it can know.

How does one get outside the system of observation or thought? It is achieved byaccessing a higher point of resolution---the tool of perception and detection being thewavelength (see article The New Education: Part XI, The Deception of ScientificProgress). The intellect is a computer-type system limited to understanding 3Dframeworks, 3D logic, and quantitative states in which the whole equals the sum ofthe parts (and therefore 3D analysis will work). It cannot get 'outside' itself. Whereasthe intuition has the ability to access higher aspects of consciousness (this is a realand substantial entity with a frequency spectrum). These aspects are higher fractallevels in precisely the same way that the fractal twig on a tree is attached to a higheraspect of itself, the branch, which is the next fractal level. These higheraspects/fractals of consciousness have higher resolution capability (shorterwavelengths) which enable the viewpoint of evaluation to be 'above' or 'outside' thesystem under observation (it doesn't have to be literally outside).

After a sufficient development of the intellect, the latter should have combined withthe full intuition. These two would compliment each other perfectly and merge to formthe higher, reasoning mind. The left-brain intellect could understand by analysis; itcould rationalise, be objective, form independent thinking with the development ofsciences, and the right-brain intuition could understand wholeness, unity, great artand music and qualitative states. Further, by means of its ability to access higheraspects of consciousness of higher resolution, it can raise the logic of the intellect andguide it continuously. (The intuition is an aspect of the experiential side of beingness,and accesses the ultimate path of knowledge/knowing through being.)

As stated, the intellect understands quantitative structures, such as a motor car,which is made up of parts, not in special or harmonic relationship. The parts thusmust be held together by forces (nuts and bolts, and welding), and therefore thewhole equals the sum of the parts. None of nature works this way. When parts are inspecial relationship, such as resonance, they quantum regenerate a whole energystate, like a collective, which binds together the parts into a true unity (qualitative); notlike the car with its parts stuck together by forces. Now the true unity is more than 3Dand the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. This requires the intuition to graspthis structure. Unity is more than 3D and clearly it must penetrate into the nextdimensional spectrum of frequencies. This is a space curvature 'window' linkingtogether a lower and higher fractal dimension.

Thus science doesn't recognise that the intellect or brain, or even mind has an input,which is a consciousness/awareness unit with an energy spectrum (not detectable byscientific methodology---see article The Limitations of Scientific Objectivity). Studentsand the general population, subject to the media, are being brainwashed to believethey are just a brain and a body. The human is far more complex than that. In additionto the brain and the body, there is a mind, basically independent of the brain bututilises the brain to interface with the body. The mind is a energy structure whichoperates on quantum states---instantaneous states---and generally has to wait for theslower brain processes. These are all machines though: body, brain and mind. Theinput consciousness has higher aspects of itself; these are fractal levels goinginwards into inner space or the 'within'. We picture these levels as going up. Thesecond fractal level is the soul level of consciousness. Note that as already implied,science doesn't detect much beyond the brain and body, and some lower levels(fields) of the mind. Thus consciousness and the universe is fractalised internally(dealt with in other articles). Our subconscious information is generally outside therange of conscious awareness and contains recordings of repressed trauma; also thesubconscious will include cellular data---the DNA records which should be accessibleby the conscious mind via the intuition (and is at this present time to some degree buta person may not know they are accessing the DNA information).

Our present-day intellect is a combination of the conscious level of awareness, 3D

rational memories, and learning programmes. But the intuition and right-brain facultiesare not given precedence and thus the 'machinery' and over-structuralisation of theintellect dominates and 'moulds' the conscious faculty to obey it---in a very similar waythat a mould or template enforces and imprints its pattern on the infinitely flexible fluidpoured into it.

The intuition is not bound by these limitations and can access memories beyond ourimmediate life and 3D existence, such as higher fractal levels (e.g., soul level) ofinformation/memories and lower levels, such as DNA records/memories.

The 3D intellect can only understand systems when the whole equals the sum of theparts . The intuition can grasp the meaning that the whole is greater than the sum ofthe parts (such as in great art and music). The intellect thus 'attacks' the intuition andemotions since it cannot understand these faculties and the wholeness characteristic.This is the essence of education and science today, hence the deterioration in thequalitative aspects of existence, etc. (see new education articles).

Note that we accept human aggressiveness as normal. It isn't---it is a mutation, amalfunction. The reason is inherent in the above information. Theintellect/science/education, attacks, discourages, suppresses the emotional side ofbehaviour, the intuition and imagination. But the intuition continues to receive anddownload information from the higher aspects of consciousness (as does the twigfrom higher branches). As a result, the energy of the information doesn't flow through,stores up and then releases as lower emotions when/where there are weaknesses(distortions, unconscious areas, instabilities). This then explodes into aggressivebehaviour, as typified in our society.

The shocking conclusion we arrive at is that we are involved in a parasitic evolution inwhich one species feeds off another by killing it and eating it. Note that the ingenuityof nature will accommodate all negative probabilities and create as viable andsurvival-oriented existence---this doesn't mean it is acceptable or normal. In keepingwith the symbiosis of consciousness and technology, amazingly this parasiticcondition also applies to technology and consciousness. Our technologies utiliseclosed-loop instead of open-loop systems (though more like a one-way flow), whichtunes into the inner-space currents of creation and in harmony with nature. Similarlyconsciousness focusses into ego closed-loop systems, isolating itself from thosesame Divine creation currents (from the 'within' )---resulting in greed and selfishnessand most of humanity's woes and misery.

Return to Home Page