Evolution is Impossible - By Dr Richard Kent

8/13/2019 Evolution is Impossible - By Dr Richard Kent

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evolution-is-impossible-by-dr-richard-kent 1/69

Free Christian Teaching

http://www.freechristianteaching.org

Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Non-

Commercial No Derivatives

Evolution is Impossible

By Dr Richard Kent



Introduction To The Author

The author of this material is Dr Richard

Kent, who operates out of a registered

non - profit UK charity, The Final Frontier

Charitable Trust, UK Registration No

1106663.

Richard is a retired medical doctor, and

an ordained Christian minister. He is

interested only in promoting the Gospel of

Jesus Christ. He sells no material at all, of

any kind.

FREE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS

MATERIAL

This teaching and PowerPoint

presentation may all be downloaded

entirely free from this web site.

This material is purely for educational purposes only.

Dr Richard Kent provides entirely free conferences anywhere in the world on this subject, and many

other subjects. For information please visit FREE CONFERENCES on this web site.

Dr Richard Kent provides completely free PowerPoint presentations on this subject, and many other

subjects. The PowerPoint presentations may be freely downloaded from FREE POWERPOINT

PRESENTATIONS on this web site.

THIS FREE CHRISTIAN EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION AND POWERPOINT PRESENTATION

IS NOT FOR SALE

This information and PowerPoint presentation is for Christian educational purposes only, and is NOT

for sale under ANY circumstances.

* These teachings and PowerPoint presentations may be freely copied and distributed.

* These teachings and PowerPoint presentations may be translated into other languages.



*These teachings and PowerPoint presentations may NOT be altered in any way.

*These teachings and PowerPoint presentations may NEVER be sold under any circumstances

*Please respect these simple guidelines

Accreditation And Legal Notices Concerning Material Used In ThisTeaching And Powerpoint Presentation

The sources of much of this research on Creation and Evolution are accredited to the following

experts on Creation:

1. Dr Kent Hovind www.drdino.com

2. Dr Chuck Missler www.khouse.org

3. Dr Carl Baugh www.creationevidence.org

4. Dr David Rosevear www.csm.org.uk/speakers.php

5. Dr Roger Oakland www.understandthetimes.org/

Dr Richard Kent would like to acknowledge the following:

* All quotations from the Bible are from the New King James Version unless otherwise stated.

* Most of the Images of Jesus Christ are used from "Matthew", produced by the Visual Bible Society,

with kind permission.

* Some images used in this presentation are legally used from www.webshots.com

* Some images are used with the kind permission of www.biblepicturegallery.com

Legal Notices

Our charity has obtained permission to use images and information whenever possible. Whenever

possible we have communicated with the source of all material used. If there is any image or

information which they have not obtained permission for, or any acknowledgement not made, please

http://www.drdino.com/



http://www.khouse.org/



http://www.creationevidence.org/



http://www.csm.org.uk/speakers.php



http://www.understandthetimes.org/



http://www.webshots.com/



http://www.biblepicturegallery.com/












accept our profound apologies. Please contact us immediately, and we will correct this immediately.

All information and images are intended to be used under the "fair use" clause of the copyright law.

Please see under: www.4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html

Sec. 107. - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use

"Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work,

including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that

section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies

for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright"

Introduction To Dr Kent Hovind

Our main resource on Creation is Dr. Kent

Hovind who is, in our view, the world

expert on Creation:

Dr Kent Hovind Creation Science Evangelism

29 Cummings Road

Pensacola, Florida USA 32503

Telephone: + 1-850-479-3466

Web site: www.drdino.com

Many of the slides in this presentation are

used with the kind permission of Dr Kent Hovind. We have personally met Dr Kent Hovind when he

lectured on Creation and Evolution at the Lakenheath American Air Force base in Suffolk, UK. There is

a great deal of free Creation material at his Creation Science Evangelism web site www.drdino.com.

We thoroughly recommend Dr Kent Hovind's books, videos and DVD's, which are inexpensive, and of

excellent quality.

When we met him, Dr Kent Hovind gave our UK charity, The Final Frontier Charitable Trust, his

personal permission to use his excellent teaching material and slides, for which we are extremely

grateful. Much of the Creation and Evolution material presented here is Dr Kent Hovind's original

http://www.4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html






http://www.drdino.com./








teaching about Creation and Evolution.

Some of Dr Kent Hovind's teaching has been adapted, and supplemented, with our own original

material, and also with ideas and teachings from the following excellent teachers on Creation: Dr

Chuck Missler, Dr Carl Baugh, Dr David Rosevear, and Dr Roger Oakland.

Dr Kent Hovind is a retired science teacher, who now speaks on Creation, Evolution, and Dinosaurs,

all over the world. Dr Kent Hovind is invited every year to speak at Chuck Missler's "Steeling the

Mind" conference in the USA. He frequently appears on Dr Carl Baugh's excellent TV series, "Creation

in the 21st Century," on TBN Christian TV, which is transmitted all over the world. Dr Kent Hovind is

frequently seen on TV in debates about Creation, particularly with Dr Hugh Ross.

Sadly all great men of God attract criticism, and there appear to be a number of critics of Dr Kent

Hovind. Creation is not a politically correct science in our atheist, secular world. Historically virtually

all great men of God have been persecuted, beginning with Jesus Christ and His disciples. This

criticism of Kent Hovind comes mainly from Evolutionists, but also from certain well known Creation

ministries.

We have researched Creation for over 20 years. By far the best teacher, and the most accurate, in

our opinion, is Dr Kent Hovind. We are absolutely delighted to be associated with this great man of

God. Dr Kent Hovind's material is easily understood. He has excellent teaching skills, his slides areexcellent, he has a sharp mind, and a good sense of humour. Furthermore, he is very generous with

his material, which is not copyrighted (unlike most Creation ministries).

Rather than criticise Evolutionists Dr Kent Hovind has for many years offered a $250,000 incentive for

anyone who can actually prove the Theory of Evolution. For details click here:

www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=67. This offer has been available on his web site for many

years, and has never been claimed. In our opinion, it never will be.

In all of our lectures on different topics, we have decided to benefit from the teachings of the best

specialists in their fields, according to their actual published material, and never on the basis of

current popular opinion, whatever that opinion may be.

The current popular opinion about Creation is that it is a fairy story. If the scoffers and sceptics about

Creation are so sure of their Evolution theories, why have none of them managed to write a simple

thesis to prove the Theory of Evolution, and earn themselves a very easy $250,000 from Kent

Hovind? If you are a sceptic or a scoffer, here is your chance to win $250,000 (click here:

www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=67)

http://www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=67.


http://www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=67






The Theory Of Evolution is a Belief System, not a Science

Evolution is not a single science which can

be studied in a laboratory, but a whole list

of beliefs as long as infinity. For example,

we have listed a very few of the beliefs

that Evolutionists teach as fact.

Evolutionists believe, amongst many other

things, that:

1. The whole Universe arose, by chance,

at an event widely known as the ""BigBang."

2. All of the matter in the Universe was contained, before the "Big Bang" in a "singularity."

3. The "singularity" was infinitesimally small, incredibly heavy, and created itself!

4. The "Big Bang" happened purely by chance, approximately 13.75 billion years ago

5. The "Big Bang" was the origin not only of matter, but of Space, Time, and Energy.

6. Space, Time, and Energy evolved simultaneously, all by chance, and all out of a "singularity,"

which was infinitesimally small.

7. All of the 118 known elements elements evolved from Hydrogen and Helium, the elements of the

Sun, a process known as "Chemical Evolution."

8. The incredibly complex Galaxies, Solar System, the Sun, the Stars, Planets, moons around the

planets, comets, asteroids, and space dust all evolved by pure chance. They all evolved from an initial

source known as a "singularity." This process is known as "Stellar and Planetary Evolution".

9. The incredibly complex orbits of all known space bodies in the solar system, such as the planets, all

occurred purely by chance.

10. The vast number of incredibly finely tuned parameters necessary for life on Planet Earth all

evolved simultaneously and correctly, purely by chance.



11. Here is a very short list of just a few of these parameters, although there are millions of them:

- The temperature

- The magnetic field

- The partial pressure of all gases

- The rotation period of the Earth

- The gravitational forces in the Universe

- The water vapour saturation

- The availability of natural resources

12. There are literally millions of other finely tuned and interdependent parameters, which all have

zero variation tolerance to maintain life.

13. According to Evolution this amazing number of interdependent parameters all spontaneously

generated, perfect for life, with no error at all, purely by chance.

14. After this "self generation" of the Universe, "Primitive Life" arose, by chance, out of the

"primordial ooze" some time after the Evolution of Planet Earth, 4.54 billion years ago. This process is

known as "Spontaneous Generation."

15. Nobody has ever seen life arising from an inanimate object, but Evolutionists insist this happened.This happened purely by chance, according to Evolutionists.

16. According to Evolution, "Primitive Life Forms" arose from inanimate matter, which contradicts the

Laws of Biogenesis.

17. We would like to point out that all life forms contain DNA, the most

highly complicated information storage medium ever known to

mankind. No life form containing DNA could possibly be called

"Primitive Life Forms" by anyone other than an Evolutionist!

18. This highly complex DNA, the incredibly complex design code used

by all living creatures, also arose by chance, according to Evolution, by

"Spontaneous Generation."

19. According to Sir Fred Hoyle, and many other scientists, this is

impossible. Please see below under Quotes From Famous

Scientists Who Do Not Believe Evolution



20. Purely by chance, DNA, within the incredibly complex cells of all living organisms, could

communicate with messenger RNA (called mRNA) so that perfect amino acids could be manufactured

within all cells.

21. In other words the two design codes, DNA and mRNA, independently arose by chance, by

Spontaneous Generation, with inbuilt messenger codes that, by chance, were identical!

22. As well as spontaneously generating themselves, DNA and mRNA were independently able to

transmit and receive highly sophisticated messages to each other about the manufacture of highly

specialised amino acids, all purely by chance!

23. The specialised manufacture of all other cells within all living organisms all "Spontaneously

Generated" independently, simultaneously, and all by chance!

24. These cells included specialised cells such as skin cells, muscle cells, blood cells, brain cells, eye

cells, liver cells, kidney cells, bone cells, and reproductive cells (to name just a few).

25. The cells that had spontaneously generated could spontaneously communicate with each other,

purely by chance.

26. The ability of all living organisms to manufacture, replicate and repair highly specialised cells alsoarose, by chance.

27. Let us take the Spontaneous Generation of the eye, as an example. According to Evolution:

- The cells of the cornea miraculously became transparent, permitting the passage of light, purely by

chance.

- Simultaneously highly sophisticated rods and cones developed within the retinas of the eyes of all

living organisms, purely by chance.

- These rods and cones spontaneously developed the ability to encode light into electrical impulses,

which then travelled along the self manufactured Optic Nerves, which also arose spontaneously and

simultaneously,and purely by chance.

- Highly sophisticated cells within the Cerebral Cortex simultaneously spontaneously develop.

- These highly specialised, self generating cells of the Cerebral Cortex could interpret these electrical



impulses, and convert these electrical signals into stereoscopic sight, purely by chance.

- The stereoscopic sight could then be interpreted by other self generating, highly sophisticated brain

cells of the Cerebral Cortex, in a highly developed independent function called Thought and

Subconscious Awareness.

- The self generating higher cortical functions, thought and Subconscious Awareness, then influences

the other Higher Cortical thoughts, and movements, both voluntary, and involuntary, of the whole

body.

- The whole brain, the most highly developed computer system known to man, also self generated

independently, simultaneously, and perfect at the very first attempt, purely by chance.

- The above is an incredibly simplified model of eyesight, which we all use every moment of our

waking lives without thinking about it.

- Evolution teaches that this amazing chain of "spontaneous and totally arbitrary events" occurred

purely by chance.

28. Each cell in the human body is vitally dependent on other cells to survive, but, according to

Evolution, this perfectly structured interdependent system all evolved simultaneously, perfectlyfunctional and integrated, and purely by chance.

29. For example, a brain cell needs oxygen to survive for more than a few seconds, and is vitally

dependent on the respiratory system and the circulatory system to provide that oxygen.

30. During the supposed millions of years required for the Evolutionary process to occur there was no

room for error at all, or the brain cells would die.

31. However, according to Evolution this was no problem, because the Circulatory Systems and the

Respiratory Systems all spontaneously self-generated, by chance, at exactly the same time, as well as

all the physical structures to support these complex systems.

32. To ensure adequate oxygen supply to the brain cells, there was spontaneous generation of the

alveoli, lungs, bronchial tubes, trachea, heart, blood vessels, capillaries, the blood-oxygen brain

barrier, the specialised haemoglobin to carry the oxygen, and the blood itself.

33. According to Evolution, all of these structures and systems all developed, by chance, perfectly



integrated, simultaneously, and working perfectly first time!

34. We would like to point out that there was no room for error at all. For example:

- Without oxygen, brain cells die almost immediately.

- Unless all of the systems involved with eyesight evolved absolutely perfectly first time, no eyesight

is possible, and the life form would be blind.

- Unless the Reproductive Systems of both males and females of all living species of all living animals,

birds, fish, insects, and humans all evolved absolutely correctly, with perfect recognition of their own

life forms, but rejection of all other life forms, then Reproduction is impossible.

- This list is virtually without end, so we will leave the reader to think of all the other limitless

"coincidences" that Evolution encompasses, all supposedly according to Chance.

35. Evolution teaches that all Anatomical, Physiological and Biochemical systems necessary for life, all

spontaneously generated by chance, all perfectly functional, perfectly interdependent, and all by

chance.

36. All the oxygen necessary for the survival of all animal life spontaneously arose, by chance.

37. All living organisms breathe in and metabolise oxygen, and exhale the waste products of

combustion, carbon dioxide.

38. All plant cells do precisely the opposite, maintaining the equilibrium.

39. This amazing interdependent process, vital for all life, providentially also spontaneously arose

purely by chance.

40. Chlorophyll in all vegetable matter harnesses the energy of the Sun, to manufacture vegetable

plant structures and energy, and produces oxygen as a waste product.

41. This oxygen is vital for the life of all animal life forms. However, according to Evolutionists, this

happened simultaneously, perfectly developed, at exactly the right time, and purely by chance. How

very convenient and fortuitous for Evolution!

42. According to Evolution, "Primitive Life Forms" evolved very slowly.

43. We would like to point out that all of these "Primitive Life Forms" contain DNA, the most complex

computer storage medium known to man, as well as the incredibly complex biochemical systems



within each single cell.

44. By no stretch of any imagination could any life form be regarded as "Primitive".

45. According to Evolution, "Complex Life Forms" arose by a process of Evolution known as Natural

Selection, so that "poorly adapted" life forms could be removed by predators from the "Evolutionary

Process".

46. According to Evolution, "Primitive Life Forms" such as fish were subjected to the processes of

Natural Selection, so that they evolved into more complex life forms, such as reptiles, mammals, and

birds.

47. According to Evolution, eventually man evolved from the apes, through a series of intermediate

forms.

48. According to Evolutionists, the whole process of Evolution was incredibly slow, and took millions

of years, which is why nobody has ever actually seen one species of animal, fish or bird evolve into

another species.

49. Evolutionists claim that Evolution is slowly happening all the time.

50. According to Evolutionists, the reason that Evolution cannot be observed in any zoo, farm, or

household, let alone in the wild, is because Evolution happens so slowly that nobody has ever

observed it.

51. According to the Theory of Evolution new species of animals, birds and fish should be found all

the time, or at least one every few years.

52. We would like to point out that certain wildlife trusts exist world-wide to protect the number of

threatened and endangered species of animals, birds, and fish.

53. The total number of species is actually declining every year, in spite of Evolution, which is

supposed to produce new species!

54. All species of animals and humans are commonly seen in different forms, although nobody has

eve seen a single species of any living organism change into another species!

55. We should clarify that we do NOT include micro-Evolution, which is variations within kinds of



species, such as different species of dogs, cats, and horses, amongst many others.

56. Charles Darwin wrote an interesting book in 1859, "The Origin of the Species" about the length

and breadth of the beaks of 14 endemic varieties of finches in the Galapagos Islands.

57. Charles Darwin's famous book certainly proved beyond doubt Micro-Evolution (discussed below),

but certainly did not prove either the Origin of Life or Macro-Evolution (discussed below) from one

species to another, as is commonly supposed.

58. There was also an interesting study on pepper moths, with light and dark coloured wings.

59. These moths are known as Typica and Melanic pepper moths, and this study also proved Micro-

Evolution, and also Natural Selection of species poorly adapted to their environment, but certainly not

Macro-Evolution.

60. This study on moths demonstrated the process of Natural Selection of pepper moths poorly

adapted for their environments, or variation within a kind, known as Micro-Evolution.

The above list contains just a very few of the very long list of interdependent beliefs that Evolutionists

maintain are fact, and are taught as fact in virtually all schools and universities in the Western world.

- The above list could be literally extended to infinity, but we have chosen to highlight a few of the

infinite number of beliefs that Evolutionists teach as proven fact.

- Evolutionists tend to believe that their World View is the only view that is consistent with Science.

- Of all of the above points, only the points concerning Micro-Evolution can be the subject of serious

scientific study, since they are the only points that can be replicated in controlled and non-prejudiced,

repeatable trials.

- The Theory of Evolution is a Theory according to its name.

- Because all of the teachings of Evolution cannot be proved or disproved, Evolution is a belief

system, not a science.



The Biblical Creation World View

The Bible, on the other hand, teaches

that the whole Universe, the Sun, the

planets, the stars, and the Solar Systems,

were all created by Jesus Christ.

The Bible opens with these majestic

words: "In the beginning God created the

Heavens and the Earth," Genesis 1:1.

The Bible teaches that Planet Earth, the

Moon, the land, the seas, the vegetation,all life, the animals, the birds, the fishes,

and mankind were all:

1. Created by Jesus Christ.

2. Created only 6,000 years ago, approximately.

Our teaching on Creation, The Genesis Account is available entirely free on this web site.

In the King James Version of the Bible, the word "Creation" appears 6 times. The Bible clearly teaches

that Jesus Christ created everything. The Bible speaks unequivocally about Creation, and that Jesus

Christ Himself is the Creator. Here are a few selected passages:

Genesis 1:1: "In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth."

John 1:1-4: "In the beginning was the Word (Jesus Christ), and the Word was with God, and the

Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without

Him nothing was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men."

Colossians 1:15-17: "He (Jesus Christ) is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all

Creation. For by Him all things were created that are in Heaven and that are on Earth, visible and

invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through

Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist."



The Universe

The word "Universe" literally means, "One spoken word". The Bible clearly teaches throughout

Genesis that God spoke, and it was so.

The Facts About Creation And Evolution

1. Nobody was present at the Biblical

Creation 6,000 years ago.

2. Nobody was present at the supposed"Big Bang", whether it was 20 billion or

12 billion years ago.

3. The two belief systems are about as far

apart as it is possible to be, a difference

of 3.3 million times in time scale alone,

and a massive difference in probabilities.

4. If you asked the average child (or non-prejudiced adult) which of the two models, Creation or

Evolution, was the more likely, there would be no contest at all

5. The Theory of Evolution is outrageous to virtually everybody in Africa, India, Pakistan, South East

Asia and South America, irrespective of their religious or cultural background.

6. Two thirds of the world's population believe that this planet was created.

7. There is a wide variation of opinion amongst those 4 billion people about how and when the world

was created, but the cultures of approximately 4 billion people still believe in Creation.

8. University professors and teachers of Western "civilised" society believe they know better than

everybody else, and are frantically trying to convert everybody else to their new belief system called

Evolution, all caused by a "god" called "chance".

9. In our Western First World society Creation is widely ridiculed.

10. In the rest of the world, predominantly Second and Third World societies, Evolution is regarded as



absurd.

11. Evolutionists love to talk about "Primitive Life Forms," which do not exist in the real world. If life

is so "simple" and "primitive", these clever people should have no problem at all creating a "simple

life form" in a laboratory. So far, they have not.

12. In the real world, all life is incredibly complex, as many scientists quoted in our teaching below

have acknowledged.

13. Most people in Western cultures have been taught to accept unquestioningly certain principles,

one of which is the Theory of Evolution.

14. The Theory of Evolution is a theory, not a fact.

15. The idea that life evolved by "Spontaneous Generation" out of nothing is a belief, and is contrary

to the Law of Biogenesis.

16. No unambiguous information, acceptable in a science laboratory or a court of law, confirms the

Creation of Life by means of any Evolutionary process.

17. If such information is available to you, or anyone you know of, world wide, please feel free towrite your thesis, and claim your $250,000 offered by Dr Kent Hovind (click here

http://www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=67 ).

18. Scientists have no clear data supporting the idea that life evolved over millions of years.

19. There is no known way to test experimentally the idea that the Origin of the Universe resulted

from a "Big Bang", or that life arose by "Spontaneous Generation."

20. Most of modern science, as taught in our Western schools and universities, is atheist when

considering the Origins of Life.

21. Biblical accounts of the Origins of Space, Matter, Time, Energy, and Life are considered to be

"outside the realms of science."

22. In fact the Bible is a very scientific book, as demonstrated in our teaching The Bible is

Supernatural on this web site.

23. Unfortunately neither the Biblical Creation Model nor the Evolution Model can be subjected to the






normal scientific experimental processes. They are both belief systems.

24. In order to have a serious discussion about either Creation or Evolution, an unprejudiced person

will have to abandon concepts that Science has "proved Evolution."

25. Science cannot prove or disprove Creation or Evolution.

26. Instead we all have to make observations about our Solar system and our Planet Earth, and come

to conclusions based on our observations. This does not involve the use of the normal scientific

method.

27. To study both Creation and Evolution we have to use a different method, but this is the only

method that is available to us. We can make observations and conclusions, but we cannot test these

theories.

28. We believe that the process of actual scientific observation and conclusion very strongly supports

Creation, as we intend to demonstrate.

Does It Matter Whether This Universe Was Created By God, Or EvolvedSpontaneously?

We believe that Christians should teach

only Creation, because:

1. The Bible is at stake, since the Bible

supports only Creation.

2. The credibility of Jesus Christ is at

stake, since He is stated to be the

Creator.

3. The Book of Genesis in particular is at

stake, since Jesus quoted Genesis 25 times.



Evolution is not a benign belief that can comfortably co-exist with Creation

1. Either the Bible is rubbish, so we should discard both the Bible, and Jesus Christ.

2. Or Evolution is rubbish, and we should discard Evolution, and stop teaching it as fact.

3. There is no middle ground. God could not possibly have used Evolution, as will be discussed below.

4. It says in Luke 3:38 that Adam was the son of God, not the son of a monkey!

Science And Evolution

Most people in Western cultures have

been taught to accept unquestioningly

certain principles, one of which is the

Theory of Evolution. The idea that life

evolved by "Spontaneous Generation" out

of nothing is a belief, and is contrary to

the Law of Biogenesis. No unambiguous

information, acceptable in a science

laboratory or a court of law, confirms the

Creation of Life by means of any

Evolutionary process.

If such information is available to you, or anyone you know of, world wide, please feel free to write

your thesis, and claim your $250,000 offered by Dr Kent Hovind (click here


Scientists have no clear data supporting the idea that life evolved over millions of years. There is no

known way to test experimentally the idea that the Origin of the Universe resulted from a ""Big

Bang", or that life arose by "Spontaneous Generation." These ideas are beliefs, not science.

Most of modern science, as taught in our Western schools and universities, is atheist when

considering the Origins of Life. Biblical accounts of the origins of Space, Matter, Time, Energy, and

Life are considered to be "outside the realms of science." In fact the Bible is a very scientific book.






Points about Evolution

1. "Traditional teaching" on Evolution has existed since 1859.

2. Most Evolutionists believe that the Universe is 20 billion years old.

3. Some Evolutionists believe that the Universe is 12 billion years old.

4. Evolutionists disagree with each other about their age of the Universe by up to 60%. This hardly

inspires confidence in their various theories.

5. Considering that Evolutionists believe the Universe to be 20 billion years old, and their theory

started in 1859, it has taken them a very long time to come up with their theories about the Origin of

the Universe, and the Origin of Life itself.

6. The various proponents of this belief system wildly disagree with each other, as we shall see.

7. This huge variation of beliefs amongst Evolutionists hardly inspires confidence in their various

theories.

What is Science?

The accepted scientific method is to construct a reliable, consistent and non-arbitrary experiment to

prove a theory. The accepted scientific technique involves:

1. The careful observation of a known event.

2. The formulation of a theory (known as a hypothesis) to explain the observed event.

3. The application of the theory to devise an experiment to prove the validity of the theory.

4. The performance of careful unbiased experimental tests.

5. The careful analysis of these tests in order to prove that the theory was correct.

If the analysis of the unbiased experiments agree prove the theory (known as a hypothesis), the

theory may well be respected as a proven theory, or natural law. If the experiments prove that the

theory was incorrect, the theory must be rejected or modified.



Science has not proved Evolution

Unfortunately neither the Biblical Creation Model nor the Evolution Model can be subjected to the

normal scientific experimental processes. They are both belief systems.

In order to have a serious discussion about either Creation or Evolution, an unprejudiced person will

have to abandon concepts that science has "proved Evolution."

Science cannot prove or disprove Creation or Evolution. Instead we all have to make observations

about our Solar system and our own Planet Earth, and come to conclusions based on our

observations.

This does not involve the use of the normal scientific method, discussed above. To study both

Creation and Evolution we have to use a different method, but this is the only method that is

available to us. We can make observations and conclusions, but we cannot test these theories.

We believe that the process of actual scientific observation and conclusion very strongly supports

Creation, as we intend to demonstrate.

The Different Types Of Evolution

The following types of Evolution are

described:

1. Cosmic Evolution: The origin of time, space and matter, by the Big Bang

2. Chemical Evolution: The origin of higher elements from hydrogen.

3. Stellar and Planetary Evolution: The origin of stars and planets.

4. Organic Evolution: The origin of Life.

5. Macro-Evolution: The changing from one kind of species to another kind of species.

6. Micro-Evolution: The variation within kinds of species.



Observations about the different types of Evolution

- Of the above supposed 6 types of Evolution, only the last one, Micro-Evolution, has ever been

observed.

- The other 5 types of Evolution are part of the Theory of Evolution.

- The other 5 types of Evolution are all theoretical, and have never been observed.

- They cannot be reproduced in a laboratory, and do not therefore fall under the strict definition of a

science.

- They are in fact a belief system, taught in countless schools and universities in the world.

- Sadly they are taught as fact, even though the factual content of the Theory of Evolution cannot be

proved or disproved, since nobody was present, and these beliefs cannot be reproduced in a

laboratory.

Problems With The First And Second Laws Of Thermodynamics

1. The Big Bang Theory

The Big Bang Theory states that the

Universe, galaxies, stars, planets arose,

by chance, from a huge explosion

between 5 and 20 billion years ago. We

would like to make the following

comments:

1. All observed explosions are destructive

and not constructive.

2. Explosions cause spontaneous degeneration and not

spontaneous generation.

3. All explosions decrease order and structure.

An illustrative example is that, if you blow up an aircraft



factory, you do not end up with a Jumbo Jet by chance.

2. The Spontaneous Generation Theory

The Spontaneous Generation Theory states that all life on planet Earth descended from a common

single-cell, arising by chance, in the "primordial ooze", 3.5 billion years ago. This contradicts the Law

of Biogenesis, which states that life comes from pre-existing life.

3. Time and Space had a finite beginning

Albert Einstein published his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905, and his General Theory of Relativity

in 1915.

In 1968 and 1970 three British astrophysicists, Steven Hawking, George Ellis and Roger Penrose

published papers in which they extended Einstein's Theory of General Relativity to include

measurements of time and space.

They discovered that time and space had a finite beginning that corresponded to the origin of matter

and energy.

Hawking, Ellis and Penrose discovered that before this finite beginning, time and space did not exist!

4. The Spontaneous Generation theory contradicts the First Law of Thermodynamics

The First Law Of Thermodynamics

The First Law of Thermodynamics is often thought of as the Law of Conservation of Mass

and Energy.

Quotations from the Concise Oxford Dictionary:

Definition of Mass: "A coherent body of matter with no definite shape".

Definition of Matter: "A physical substance or material in general, as distinct from mind and spirit

(in physics), which occupies space and possesses mass, especially as distinct from energy".

Definition of Energy: "The property of matter and radiation which is manifest as a capacity to

perform work".



The First Law of Thermodynamics states that the sum of the following energies in a closed

system remains constant:

1. Kinetic Energy

2. Potential Energy

3. Thermal Energy

Matter, or its energy equivalent, cannot be either created or destroyed under natural circumstances.

To explain the origin of matter in the atheistic Spontaneous Generation model, it is assumed that

matter arose from nothing.

This is in direct contravention of the First Law of Thermodynamics which demands that Matter

Cannot Create Itself. Logically there must therefore have been an "Outside Agency", Who the Bible

describes as God, Who created everything.

5. Evolution contradicts the Second law of Thermodynamics

In the Theory of Evolution it is proposed that "simple life" evolved into more complex life forms by

Spontaneous Generation. Both Darwin's Theory of Evolution and the Spontaneous Generation modelboth directly contravene the Law of Biogenesis.

The Second Law Of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the disorder in a system increases, rather than

decreases. The Second Law of Thermodynamics gives a precise definition of a property called

Entropy.

Entropy: Entropy can be thought of as a measure of the disorder in a system. The Second Law of

Thermodynamics states that the Entropy, or disorder, of an isolated system can never decrease. In

other words, in our Universe, a state of order progresses to a state of disorder.

For example:

- The Sun and the stars are burning up.

- The Sun is cooling down.



- The Universe is "winding down".

- Ultimately there will be "heat death" of the Universe.

In other words, everything in our Universe tends to disorder. This principle of Entropy is exactly what

the Bible teaches in the following Scriptures:

Hebrews 1:10-12, "Lord, in the beginning you made the Earth, and the Heavens are the work of your

hands. They will disappear into nothingness, but you will remain forever. They will become worn out

like old clothes, and some day you will fold them up and replace them. But you yourself will never

change, and your years will never end", TLB.

Psalm 102:25-27, "In ages past you laid the foundations of the Earth and made the Heavens with

your hands! They shall perish, but you go on forever. They will grow old like worn-out clothing, and

you will change them like a man putting on a new shirt and throwing away the old one! But you

yourself never grow old. You are forever, and your years never end", TLB.

In the world that we observe, nothing gets more ordered in design and structure, without an input

from an external higher energy source.

The Coliseum in Rome

The Coliseum is not getting in a more ordered state by

itself, but is in fact becoming less ordered, and will

eventually collapse completely.

Evolutionist claim that adding energy to a system will

increase the order in that system

This claim is not borne out in observations.

- America added a lot of energy, in the form of nuclear bombs, to Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.

But America certainly did not increase order in either city.

- The Sun's energy is destructive to everything on Earth except one molecule called Chlorophyll,

- The Sun will eventually burn the roof of our houses and turn the bricks to powder.



Implications of Second Law of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics implies that the Universe could not order and provide energy for

itself.

The order and energy observed in the Universe implies an "Outside Agency", Who the Bible describes

as God.

Scientific Problems With The Theories Of Charles Darwin

The Theory of Evolution

Much of the following information has beenadapted from the work of Dr David Rosevear, UK,

web site: www.Creationsciencemovement.com

Charles Darwin and his book, "The Origin of

the Species"

- Charles Darwin wrote "The Origin of the Species"

in 1859.

- What he observed was very small variation in the

length and breadth of the beaks of finches.

Finches are small birds found in the Galapagos

Islands, off the Western cost of South America.

- Darwin actually noted variation within a species,

or variation of a kind.

- These variations in the bird's beaks were so

minor that later visitors to the Islands had trouble identifying the variations.

- What Darwin actually observed was Micro-Evolution, or variation within one species of bird, which

we all see all the time.

- Darwin need not have bothered to travel to the Galapagos Islands to observe Micro-Evolution, or

variation within species.

http://www.creationsciencemovement.com/






- Everyone sees evidence of variation within a species all the time.

- Darwin did not observe Macro-Evolution, the changing of one species into another, for example a

lizard turning into a bird.

- Macro-Evolution has never been observed by anybody.

- Darwin observed variation of a species within a kind, namely Micro-Evolution, which is commonly

observed in every country in the world.

Macro-Evolution

- Macro-Evolution is defined as the mutation of one species to another species, and has never been

observed.

- Since Evolution is supposed to happen very slowly, there should be plenty of examples of Evolution

all around us, with new species being

formed all the time.

- However, no evolutionist has ever actually produced one living example of a species actually

changing into another species.

- A number of fossil relics and skeletons have been produced, claiming to demonstrate Macro-

Evolution.

- However, these fossil remains are hotly debated, some have been shown to be frauds, and Carbon

Dating itself is not accepted by many Creationists.

- If Evolution was true, the total number of species in the world should be increasing every year.

- In fact, the number of species in the world is declining

every year, according to the World Wildlife Organisation.

Micro-Evolution

Micro-Evolution is defined as the variation within one kind of

species. There are large number of dogs found all over the

world. Dog DNA has a gene pool for long legs, short legs,



long hair, short hair, large bodies and small bodies etc. Since dogs share the same common gene

pool, dogs may be interbred with other kinds of dogs, and the resultant dog is called a mongrel dog,

with features common to both parents. The same may be found with cats, horses, rabbits, guinea

pigs, and many other animals commonly seen.

However, it is not possible to interbreed a dog with a rabbit. These different species do not share the

same gene pool. In rare cases distantly related species may be interbred, such as a horse with a

donkey. However, the resultant offspring is invariably sterile, and unable to continue this new

"species".

In Contrast with Macro-Evolution, Micro-Evolution is defined as the variation within one kind of

species and is very commonly observed. Examples of Micro-Evolution include the variation between

kinds of dogs, cats, birds, horses, and ducks.

Charles Darwin need not have bothered to travel to the Galapagos Islands, he could have easily

noticed Micro-Evolution amongst domestic pets in his own home, or birds in his own garden.

Charles Darwin did not observe Macro-Evolution, but Micro-Evolution, which is commonly observed on

an everyday basis.

Melanic and Typica Pepper Moths

Another so called "proof" of Evolution, often quoted, is the

natural selection of moths in England, according to the

colour of their wings in England during the Industrial

Revolution. At this time there was considerable industrial

pollution near large cities, and black coal dust was

deposited on the barks of trees, making the trees darker.

It was noticed that the moths with dark coloured wings,

the Melanic moths, were better adapted to their

environment, and were better camouflaged. The Melanic moths were therefore not as clearly seen by

birds, their natural predators, as the moths with light coloured wings, known as the Typica pepper

moths, against the dark bark of trees.

This discovery was hailed as a great breakthrough in proving Natural Selection by "Survival of the

Fittest" as the mechanism for Evolution.



However, this Natural selection only applies within a kind, or species. It certainly applies to Micro-

Evolution, and is commonly seen throughout nature. However, it certainly does not prove Macro-

Evolution, which has never been observed anywhere.

Darwin proposed his Theory of Evolution on the basis of:

1. Variation within species, using his example of the length and breadth of finches' beaks in the

Galapagos Islands.

2. Survival of the fittest, strongest and best adapted animals.

3. Gene mutation as his proposed method for providing new genetic information fro new species or

kinds of living organisms.

Gene Mutation does NOT provide new useful genetic information

Mutation in the DNA code within every cell of every living organism is commonly observed, and can

be caused by:

1. Radiation

2. Chemicals

3. Disease

However, all actual observed Gene Mutations cause disease or malformation. Examples of these

include:

1. Down's syndrome.

2. pina bifida.

3. Anencephaly (absent head).

4. Tragic foetal abnormalities caused by drugs such as Thalidomide.

5. Tragic increase of cancer following the nuclear explosion in Chernobyl.



6. Tragic increase in cancer following the nuclear explosions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Conclusion: Gene mutation, as proposed by Charles Darwin, according to actual observation does

NOT lead to the development of a new gene pool, and does NOT lead to a new species.

Natural Selection does NOT lead to Macro-Evolution

- Natural selection provides no new genetic information from which a new species can evolve.

- Natural selection actually preserves the species, rather than encouraging the Evolution of a mutant.

- Mutations, as actually observed, are abnormal mutations, which are selected against.

Science does NOT support Evolution

- Darwin postulated that Evolution occurs very slowly, but there are no intermediate fossil forms.

- All observed information systems, as found in DNA, require an outside programming Intelligence,

such as a Designer, a Creator, God.

"Simple" life forms, such as Amoebas are in fact incredibly complex, because these unicellular

organisms contain DNA.

- Evolution is not supported by Molecular Biology.

- For example, different kinds of fish and animals have different haemoglobin.

- To create anything, on this planet, or in the Universe, you need both Power and Information.

- Information cannot create itself, and cannot harness itself in the highly complex DNA of all living

organisms without and Outside Agency, Who the Bible refers to as God.



Quotes From Famous Scientists Who Do Not Believe Evolution

It is NOT true that all scientists believe in Evolution.

Sir Fred Hoyle, a famous UK astronomer, wrote:

"A super intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well aswith chemistry and biology … The likelihood of theformation of life from inanimate matter is one to a numberof 10 with 40 thousand noughts (zeros) after it. It isenough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of Evolution.There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet nor onany other, and if the beginnings of life were not randomthey must therefore have been the product of a purposefulintelligence," (Nature: vol.294:105, Nov 12 1981).

In 1982 Francis Crick, winner of the Nobel Prize inBiology after discovering DNA, wrote:

"An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available tous now, could only state that in some sense, the Origin oflife appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, somany are the conditions which would have to be satisfiedto get it going" (Life Itself, Its Origin and Nature, Futura,London 1982).

In 1930 British physicist Sir James Jeans wrote:

"Nature seems very con versant with the rules of pure mathematics … In the same way, a scientificstudy of the action of the Universe has suggested a conclusion which may be summed up… in thestatement that the Universe appears to have been designed by a pure mathematician… the Universecan best be pictured, although still very imperfectly and inadequately, as consisting of pure thought…If the Universe is a Universe of thought, then its Creationmust have been an act of thought. Indeed the finiteness ofspace compels us to think of the creator as workingoutside time and space, which are part of his Creation, justas an artist is outside his canvas," (The MysteriousUniverse p 146).

NASA astronomer Robert Jastrow wrote:

Robert Jastrow "Now we see how the astronomicalevidence leads to a Biblical view of the Origin of the world:the chain of events leading to man commenced suddenlyand sharply in a definite moment of time, in a flash of lightand energy", (God and the Astronomers, page 14).

The astronomer George Greenstein wrote:

"As we survey all the evidence, the thought instantly arisesthat some supernatural agency, or rather Agency, must beinvolved. Is it possible that suddenly, without intending to, we have stumbled upon the existence of a

Supreme Being? Was it God who stepped in and so providentially crafted the cosmos for our benefit?"



Physicist and Nobel Laureate Arno Penzias wrote:

"Astronomy leads us to a unique event, an Universe which was created out of nothing, one with avery delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to permit life, and one whichhas an underlying (one might say 'supernatural') plan."

Robert Shapiro wrote:

"The improbability involved in generating even one bacterium is so large that it reduces allconsiderations of time and space to nothingness. Given such odds, the time until the black holesevaporate and the space to the ends of the Universe would make no difference at all. If we were towait, we would truly be waiting for a miracle",

DNA, The Design Code ThatGod Created In All Of Our Cells

In 1952, DNA was discovered. It may

have been discovered, but it is so

complex that it will never be understood.

The design code that God uses for all

living cells is DNA. Our human bodies are

fantastically complicated and are actually

made out of 17 of the known 107

elements. Each individual cell is

individually and perfectly developed

according to the intricate design code

imprinted by God on the DNA within all of

our cells.

Definition of an Element:

"Each of more than one hundred

substances that cannot be chemically

interconverted or broken down, each

consisting of atoms with the same atomic

number," Concise Oxford Dictionary.

These thoughts are too complex for us to truly understand, as the Psalmist said:



Psalms 139:13-18

"For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb. I praise you because

I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. My frame was

not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place. When I was woven together in the depths

of the Earth, your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in your

book before one of them came to be. How precious to me are your thoughts, O God! How vast is the

sum of them! Were I to count them, they would outnumber the grains of sand. When I awake, I am

still with you" (NIV).

DNA is composed of four amino acids:

- Adenine

- Thymidine

- Guanine

- Cytosine

DNA an extremely complex molecule, and is the design storage medium for each individual cell of the

human body. DNA is in fact a three out of four code, with storage capacity beyond our ability to

comprehend. Take this as an illustration, one pin head of DNA would have enough storage capacity to

store all the information on all the hard discs of all the computers on this planet. Each particular cellin the human body has a design code, with information about how it should be manufactured, how it

should function, repair itself, and replicate.

Definition of a Molecule:

"A group of atoms bonded together, representing the smallest fundamental unit of compound that

can take part in a chemical reaction", Concise Oxford Dictionary.

There are 75 trillion cells in the human body. Each cell has a full complement of chromosomes in its

nucleus. Each nucleus has 46 chromosomes made up of 23 pairs, one from each of the two parents

of each individual. Each chromosome contains a strand of DNA. Each strand of DNA includes

hundreds of millions of base pairs, that if stretched out straight, each strand of DNA would measure

3-9 feet long, and about 20 atoms across.

Definition of an Atom:

"The smallest particle of a chemical element, consisting of a positively charged nucleus (containing



protons and typically also neutrons) surrounded by negatively charged electrons", Concise Oxford

Dictionary.

The DNA code includes details of our height, our personality, our intelligence, the colours of our eyes

and other physical attributes.

Design codes do not spontaneously evolve

Everything that we can observe, whether God made it or man made it, has a design. We can observe

the product of modern design technologies, such as an aeroplane, a house, a watch, a computer, a

television, a car, or a NASA designed rocket. All of these have intricate designs.

We will benefit by looking closely at these man made designs. Nowadays, most products are designed

on computer systems. The computer systems themselves are designed by experts in software design.

Your computer software did not arrive on your hard disc by "Spontaneous Generation". It was

painstakingly developed using highly skilled software engineers.

Nothing that we observe on this planet occurred by

chance. The software on your computer that you are using

now, was also carefully designed. Without wishing to be

disrespectful to software engineers, anyone who has usedcomputers of any design will know how temperamental

they are. Virtually all man made computer systems cause

problems to their owners.

DNA is incredibly reliable information storage

medium

God's design system is quite different. The DNA in each of our cells is far more complex, yet very

rarely malfunctions. To suggest that DNA "spontaneously generated" is not credible, as we shall see.

Mathematical calculations about DNA "spontaneously generating"

It can be calculated mathematically, using Switching Theory, that the chance of one DNA molecule

occurring randomly is one chance in 1053. This would be written as ten with fifty-two zeros after it.

The scientific community discounts any "chance" greater than one chance in 1050. In other words,

DNA could not possibly have evolved by "spontaneous generation".



Calculations by Sir Fred Hoyle, UK Nobel Prize winner

The UK Nobel Prize winner Sir Fred Hoyle wrote: "The

likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is

one to a number of 10 with 40,000 zeros after it," (Nature:

vol.294:105, Nov 12 1981).

This huge number needs to be put in perspective

- The number of atoms in the Universe is considered to be

10 with 77 zeros after it.

- The number of seconds in 20 billion years is 10 with 17

zeros after it.

These huge figures are very difficult for us to imagine. But

Sir Fred Hoyle's figure of 10 with 40,000 zeros after it is

impossible for us to imagine.

Difficulties with information systems

Evolutionists would like us to believe that:

- The "message sender" (DNA) and the "message receiver" (mRNA) both spontaneously evolved, by

chance.

- The message sender" (DNA) and the "message receiver" (mRNA) instantaneously communicated

with each other.

This is so unlikely that for practical purposes we can consider this impossible by the laws of

probability.

Let us use two mobile phones as an illustration.

- Mobile phones use much simpler technology than DNA and mRNA.

- If two separate cellular phones were able to spontaneously self generate, one in London, the other



in Melbourne, I think we could all agree that they would not be able to immediately communicate

with each other.

- Only if appropriate SIM cards for the same mobile phone network were inserted into both cellular

phones could they communicate with each other.

- In other words, no manufactured system can communicate with another manufactured system

unless they are programmed by an outside agency.

- They would only be able to communicate with each other when an outside agency, of greater

technological expertise, programmed all the cellular phones to identical frequencies, using identical

computer languages.

We hope you can see the problems that Evolutionists have in persuading Creationists that everything

happened by chance. The problem, as in this case, is that this is just not possible.

- It is not possible, statistically speaking, for DNA and mRNA to spontaneously evolve.

- Even if it were possible, they would not be able to communicate with each other.

- However, that is not the end of the problem.

Chirality of all molecules and all proteins in living systems

- It is well known that DNA and mRNA exist as a helix with a twist to their complicated geometric

structures.

- The nature of the twist is known technically as the "chirality" of the molecule.

- DNA and mRNA all exist in the right-hand form only. They are known as Dextrorotatory.

- The amino acids in all living systems are in the left-hand form. They are Laevorotatory.

- Even if DNA could "spontaneously generate by chance from the primordial ooze" it would contain

equal proportions of left and right handed forms.

- This is technically called a racemic mixture of left and right handed forms.



- If this spontaneous generation is supposed to have occurred by chance, then, according to the laws

of probability, there would have to be an equal amount of left and right handed forms of DNA.

- However, this mixture would be useless for life!

- All DNA used in all living organisms is right handed, or dextrorotatory.

- A mixture of self generated DNA containing an equal amount of left and right handed forms of DNA

would be completely useless for life!

There are therefore totally insuperable problems for Evolutionists

- It is not possible, statistically speaking, for DNA and mRNA to spontaneously evolve.

- Even if it were possible, they would not be able to communicate with each other!

- A self generated racemic mixture of DNA is completely useless for life!

Further Discussion Of The Big Bang Theory

There are only two generally accepted

world views:

1. The Biblical world view: The Bible

states that God created the Universe in

Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning God

created the Heavens and the Earth."

2. The Humanists world view: In the

Humanist Manifesto 1, of 1933, Tenant

stated that, "Humanists regard the

Universe as self existing and not created."



The Origin of the Big Bang Theory

The Big Bang idea began with a Belgian astronomer, Georges Edward LeMaitre (1894-1966).

According to Isaac Asimov, LeMaitre conceived this mass to be "no more than a few light-years in

diameter" in 1955.

Definition of Mass: According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary, "Mass is a coherent body of matter

with no definite shape".

Bolton Davidheiser has stated the following:

- In 1955 according to Isaac Asimov, LeMaitre originally conceived the diameter of the mass to be a

minimum of two light-years, or about twelve trillion miles.

- By 1965 that figure was reduced to 275 million miles.

- By 1974 to 54 thousand miles.

- By 1983 to "a trillionth the diameter of a proton,"

- Now the mass is considered to be infinitesimally small. It is known as a "singularity"!

By observing these points above we note that Evolutionists beliefs concerning the Origins of the

Universe are hardly consistent over a mere 60 years! The supposed Origins of the Universe have

changed from a mass twelve trillion miles in diameter, to a mass infinitesimally small!

We do not personally believe that such massive variations in the Big Bang Theory provides the Big

Bang theory with any credibility at all!

We would also like to point out that these massive variations of this core belief occurred over a mere

sixty years, at the time of the origin of this new belief system!

Conversely the Bible remains totally consistent about the origins of the Universe, over the entire

Bible. For further information please visit Creation: The Genesis Account on this web site.

According to Evolutionists the whole Universe evolved from nothing

"The observable Universe could have evolved from an infinitesimal region. It is then tempting to go



one step further and speculate that the entire Universe evolved from literally nothing," Quoted from

Alan Guth & P. Steinhardt, Scientific American, May 1984 p.12.

We would like to highlight the speculation involved in the Big Bang Theory in the above quotation!

According to all scientists, the Universe is expanding. According to proponents of the Big Bang Theory

this means that the Universe must have once been much smaller, and that the expanding mass of the

Universe, including Space and Time, can therefore extrapolated back to nothing, a "singularity".

According to Evolutionists, the Universe began as a gigantic explosion from the singularity. The

singularity is now considered to be mass infinitesimally small. The singularity span faster and faster,

and eventually exploded. During the explosion, pieces flew off, and became suns, stars, planets,

comets and asteroids.

We would like to point out that the Big Bang Theory is a theory, according to its name! It has always

referred to as the Big Bang Theory, never as the Big Bang Fact! No Evolutionist was present at this

supposed event, which is now taught as fact in most schools and universities.

Both Creation and Evolution are belief systems, otherwise known as religions!

- Both the Biblical Creation world views and the Evolutionary world view are both belief systemswhich ultimately have to be accepted by faith in the most likely event.

- However, there is not a level playing field, because News media and textbooks always try to present

Evolution as a modern science, and Creation as an outdated old fashioned religion.

- The unspoken message is that Evolution is part of science, and that Creation is not scientific.

- Nothing could be further from the truth, as we hope to demonstrate.

In fact, both Evolution and Creation are both belief systems, which broadly come under the heading

of religions!

- The question is not which is scientific, because neither

Creation nor Evolution can be replicated in a laboratory.

- The question is actually which belief system, Creation or

Evolution, is correct.



The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that everything tends toward disorder, however, the "Big

Bang" theory claims that an explosion created everything.

- Evolutionists believe that the entire solar system was formed from clouds of gas and dust, which

derived ultimately from nothing.

- his belief is opposed to the First Law of Thermodynamics.

- Evolutionists believe that if energy is added it will increase order, and reverse Entropy.

- This is opposed to the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

- If the Big Bang Theory actually happened, as taught by Evolutionists, then the Sun, planets,

comets, and the Moon should be made of similar elements.

- In fact, we know that the Sun is 98% Hydrogen or Helium.

- In fact, we know that the Earth, the Moon, Venus, and Mercury all contain less than 1% Hydrogen

or Helium.

- The Law of Conversation of Angular Momentum, discussed below, causes very major problems for

the credibility of the Big Bang Theory.

- Observations of our Solar System do NOT support the big Bang Theory.

The Law Of Conservation Of AngularMomentum

The Law of Conversation of Angular Momentum causes

very serious problems for the Big Bang Theory. One way

to understand the Law of Conversation of Angular

Momentum is to illustrate this law of Physics with a

practical example.

A roundabout in a children's play area

Let us imagine that we have some children playing on aroundabout in a children's play area.



- Phase 1: We ask three out of the children to sit on the roundabout and hold tight, and the

remaining two children to spin the roundabout.

- Phase 2: The roundabout is now travelling at 30 mph, and the children pushing the roundabout are

beginning to perspire.

- Phase 3: When the roundabout is spinning quite fast at 60 mph, the children on the roundabout are

beginning to become frightened. They cry out, "Stop! Stop! Please slow down!"

- Phase 4: When the roundabout begins to spin much faster at 100mph, such is the gravitational

forces on the children sitting on the roundabout that they all fly off the roundabout.

- Phase 5; Because of the Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum the children will all fly off the

roundabout moving in the same direction as the roundabout. If the roundabout was rotating

clockwise, the children will also be rotating clockwise.

The Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum can now be applied to the Big Bang Theory

- In the case of the Big Bang Theory the "singularity" was

supposed to have spun very fast, and then exploded in africtionless environment, which the Universe must have

been if all the matter was concentrated at one point.

- According to the Law of Conservation of Linear

Momentum, all the planets should spin in the same

direction.

- We know from observation of the planets in our Solar System that the planets Venus, Uranus and

possibly Pluto spin in the opposite direction to the other six planets.

- In addition to that, there are 63 known moons of the planets. Of these moons, six spin in the

opposite direction to the remaining 57.

- In our Solar System, three of the planets, Jupiter, Saturn and Neptune, have moons orbiting in both

directions.

- The above facts are quoted from "Astronomical Almanac for the year 1989" (Wash. DC U.S.



Government Printing Office, 1989) p. E88.

- From the Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum we can see that if our Solar System evolved

spontaneously by a Big Bang, all the moons should orbit their planets in the same direction.

- The only exception to this would be if they encountered a large mass, such as another planet.

- However, this event should certainly have left a crater, which it would have been observed by

astronomers.

- Observations of our Solar System do NOT support the big Bang Theory.

Difference of angular momentum of the Sun and the planets

The Sun actually spins very much more slowly than the planets. This certainly does not support the

Big Bang Theory, as explained in the following quotation:

"This (Angular Momentum) would have caused the Sun to spin very rapidly. Actually, our Sun spins

very slowly, while the planets move very rapidly around the Sun. In fact, although the Sun has over

99% of the mass of the solar system, it has only 2% of the angular momentum. This pattern is

directly opposite to the pattern predicted for the nebular hypothesis." Quoted from Dr. H. Reeves"The Origin of the Solar System", in "The Origin of the Solar System", Dermott, S.F. Ed. John Wiley &

Sons, New York p. 9, 1978.

Evolutionist cannot explain the angular momentum of the Solar System:

"The ultimate origin of the solar system's angular momentum remains obscure." Quoted from solar

system Evolutionist scientist, Dr. Stuart Ross Taylor, "Solar System Evolution, A New Perspective,"

Cambridge University Press, p. 53, 1992, Dr. Stuart Ross Taylor.

Conservation of Angular Momentum



The Milky Way is "lumpy"

If the Big Bang Theory were true, the planets would all spin in the same direction, and the matter

would be evenly distributed through the Solar System. Instead it is "lumpy". Throughout the Milky

Way there are clusters of stars, then great areas of empty space. This subject is discussed in detail in

"Creation Ex Nihilo Dec. 99, p. 8".

Unexplained Observations About The Planets Saturn And Jupiter

Saturn's rings are unstable and cannot be

billions of years old.

The planet Saturn has rings around it, but

these rings are unstable. They are moving

away from the planet, and Saturn is

loosing its rings. At the current rate of

movement of Saturn's rings, they could

have been there for only a few thousand

years. If the Universe was billions of yearsold, Saturn's rings would have

disappeared into space billions of years ago. This is explained in the following books:

- "See It's a Young World After All", by Paul Ackerman.

- "In the Beginning", by Walt Brown pp.29 & 69.

Jupiter's moon Ganymede has a strong magnetic field.

Jupiter's moon Ganymede is still hot. A small moon should not be hot after billions of years, any more

than our own moon. This certainly does not support the theory of an old universe.

This subject is discussed in the following article: "Magnetic fields are generated by the liquid motion

of molten metal inside a body. Yet Ganymede should have cooled solid billions of years ago." Quoted

from Denver Post December 13, 1996, "Jupiter Probe detects mysterious moon dust", by K.C. Cole.



The Moon Is Receding From Planet Earth

Observation demonstrates that the Moon

is getting farther from the Earth by two

inches every year. This indicates that the

Moon used to be closer.

This causes very serious problems to the

Evolutionists, because the proximity of

the Moon to planet Earth controls the height of the tides.

Because of the law in Physics called the Inverse Square Law, the closer the Moon to the Earth, the

higher the tides on the Earth.

The Inverse Square Law

This law of Physics states that, "The force of attraction between two objects is inversely proportional

to the square of the distance between them".

The Inverse Square Law proves that the closer the distance between two objects, the greater the

force of attraction will be between them. Thus if the moon is only slightly closer to the Earth, the

magnetic forces of attraction are dramatically increased, and the tides become very much higher.

Theoretical calculations concerning the height of the tides

- The Moon is receding from the Earth at the rate of two inches a year.

- The magnetic forces of attraction between the Moon and the Earth become very slightly weaker

every year, so that, in general, tides become slightly lower on average.

- 6,000 years ago, when Adam and Eve were created, there were no tides because the Earth had not

been covered in water.

- 4,400 years ago, after Noah's Flood, the tides would have been slightly higher, on average, than the

tides we see today.

- However, 4 billion years ago, when, according to the Evolutionists Life created itself on Earth, the

tides would theoretically been very high indeed.



- In fact, because of the Inverse Square Law, the whole planet Earth would have been completely

covered in water twice a day!

- This alone would have made Evolution impossible.

The Space Dust On The Surface Of The Moon

The windows of a Space rocket

If you were to look at a glass window of a

Space rocket that has travelled into

space, you would notice that it will be

very scratched. This is because there is a

lot of dust in Space which scratches the

Space rocket window.

The dust on the Moon

As the Moon is spinning around the Earth

it is gathering dust on it, as it travels

through Space collecting Space dust.

Evolutionists believe that the Moon, like

the Earth, is millions of years old. It was therefore predicted in 1955 that the Moon will have Space

dust on it several miles deep.

- Lyttleton felt that X-rays and UV light striking exposed moon rocks "could during the age of the

moon be sufficient to form a layer over it several miles deep."(Quote from Monthly Notices of the

Royal Astronomical Society of London Vol. 115, 1955, pp. 585-604)

- Isaac Asimov wrote, "I get a picture, therefore, of the first spaceship, picking out a nice level place

for landing purposes, coming in slowly downward tail-first and sinking majestically out of

sight."(Quoted from: Isaac Asimov (1959), Science Digest, Jan., 1959 p. 36).

- Even children's books wrote about the excessive dust on the moon. Here is an example from a



children's book written in 1959, "There is just deep, gray dust. Dust, dust, dust." (Quoted from "You

Will go to the Moon" by Mae and Ira Freeman, Random House, USA).

Ladder designed 18 inches too short

When NASA designed the spacecraft for the 1969 mission to the Moon, the engineers specially

adapted the Lunar Space Module to land on the Moon, with the anticipated deep covering of dust.

Ladder designed 18 inches too short NASA provided the following adaptations to the Lunar Space

Module and the astronaut's equipment:

- Huge horizontal landing pads, so that the Lunar Space Module would not sink into the dust. This is

the same principle as snow shoes used on deep soft snow.

- The ladder on the Lunar Space Module, designed for the astronauts to descend onto the surface of

the Moon from the Lunar Space Module, was purposely designed 18 inches too short, in anticipation

of a deep dust layer.

- The backpack that the astronauts carried on their backs was designed dustproof, in case the

astronauts sank into the deep Space dust on the surface of the Moon.

When the spacecraft landed on the Moon, it was in fact found that the dust on the Moon was only

about ½ inch deep. This suggested that the Moon was not billions of years old, but only a young

Moon, exactly as the Bible indicates.



- Ranger and Surveyor space programs were sent to the Moon to assess the "dust problem."

- It has been demonstrated that Space Dust actually gathers at the rate of 2.7 inches per million

years.

- When it was discovered that the Moon was covered with only ½ inch of Space Dust, this simply

implies that the Moon is only a few thousand years old, exactly as the Bible indicates.

Comets Are Still Observed In Space

Comets are occasionally observable in

Space using the unaided human eye.

There are a large number of comets

travelling through Space. Comets become

observable to the human eye only when

they are comparatively close to the Earth.

They are technically referred to as "shortperiod comets". As comets travel through

space, they intermittently loose parts of

their material, as the combined effects of

the solar wind and the Sun burns pieces of material off them. Comets continue to loose material. The

pieces of material are burned up as they leave the comets, explaining the big long bright tail behind

them. Comets have a total life expectancy of less than 10,000 years, because they burn out.

Evolutionist need to explain to Creationists why, if the Universe is millions of years old, comets still

observed in Space at all, in view of their short life of only 10,000 years. There is no indication at all

that new comets are being created.

A similar argument can be applied to asteroids and space dust. The existence of comets, asteroids,

and space dust indicates a young Universe, less than 10,000 years old.



The Magnetic Field Of The Earth Is Becoming Weaker

Definition of a Magnetic Field

A magnetic field is that energy that

surrounds a magnet. A magnet has

Magnetic Poles with a North Pole and a

South Pole. A North Pole attracts a South

Pole, but repels a North Pole.

On the right is a diagram showing a

magnet with the North (N) and South

Pole (S) magnetic fields surrounding it: Magnets loose strength over time

The Earth has a Magnetic Field, with a Magnetic North and a Magnetic South Pole, and acts like a

large magnet.

The Earth is also loosing its magnetic strength over

time.

All Magnetic Fields get weaker and weaker, and Magnets

loose their magnetic strength over time. Similarly, the

Earth is also losing the strength of its magnetic field.

According to Donald DeYoung in "Astronomy and the

Bible" p. 18, "The Earth's magnetic strength has declined by 6% in the last 150 years".

Apart from other implications, this means that the Earth cannot be older than a maximum of 25,000

years old. It also means that radioactive Carbon Dating cannot work for more than a few thousand

years.

The implications of this are profound. If the Earth's magnetic field has declined by 6% over the last

150 years, then, by extrapolation, the Magnetic Field at the supposed Evolution of Life, millions of

years ago, would have been enormous.

The strength of the Magnetic Field greatly affects the Gravitational Force. With the dramatically

increased Gravitational Force at the supposed time of the Evolution of Life it would have been

impossible for animals or human beings to stand upright, or even move about. It would have

prevented birds from flying, and fish from swimming.



This enormous Magnetic Field would have prevented the existence of life at all! This means that the

Earth cannot be millions of years old.

The Earth Is Slowing Down

Because of the Second Law of

Thermodynamics, the Earth is slowing

down. In fact the whole Universe is

slowing down. The Earth is spinning at

approximately 1000 miles per hour at the

equator, but it is slowing down. The Earthis slowing down at a rate of 1/1000

second per day.

Regular clocks use days as a measure,

which are growing longer by a thousandth

of a second or more daily as Earth's

rotation slows down.

According to Astronomy Magazine, June 1992, p 24, "The Earth's Rotation is slowing down. To

compensate for this lagging motion, June will be one second longer than normal. This 'Leap Second'

announced by the International Earth Rotation Service in February, will keep calendar time in close

alignment with international time."

Addition of Leap Seconds

To allow for the slowing of the Earth, leap seconds are added to the international cosmic clocks every

18 months. The following are the past Leap Seconds recorded by the International Earth Rotation

Service:

Jan. 1973

Jan. 1974

Jan. 1975

Jan. 1976

Jan. 1977

Jan. 1978

Jan. 1979



Jan. 1980

July 1981

July 1982

July 1983

July 1985

Jan. 1988

Jan. 1990

Jan. 1991

July 1992

July 1993

July 1994

Jan. 1996

Leap seconds are added approximately every 18 months.

If the Earth is only 6,000 years old, as the Bible says, there is no problem:

- In the time of Adam the Earth was spinning slightly faster.

- The 24 hour day would have elapsed slightly faster, but the difference would not be noticeable.

- This may explain why the Babylonians had a 360 day year, instead of our current 365 day year.

If the Earth is billions of years old, as the Evolutionists claim, this would pose enormous

problems

- The Earth would have been spinning much faster.

- The 24 hour days would have been compressed into a

few seconds only.

- The Centrifugal Force would be a major problem.

- Centrifugal force is that force that tends to maintain the

direction of a moving object in the direction of its current movement.

- If the Earth was billions of years old the Centrifugal force would be so high that everything and

everyone would actually fly into space!



- The winds would have been 5,000 miles per hour, due to the Coriolis Effect.

- If the dinosaurs lived 200 million years ago they would have been blown away from the Earth!

Population Studies Indicate A Young Planet Earth

According to the Star Tribune

Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, July 24,

1999, "Last weekend the world's

population topped 6 billion".

In 1985 there were 5 billion people in the

world.

In the year 1800 there were only 1 billion

people in the whole world.

In the year 3 BC a Roman Census at the time of the Birth of Jesus Christ indicated that the population

of the world was 250 million.

All text books teach that, and the world's population is growing rapidly.

Year World Population

2000 6 Billion

1958 5 Billion

1800 1 Billion

3BC 250 Million

The Bible teaches that:

- 6,000 years ago God created the Universe.

- 4,400 years ago there was a Flood which destroyed everyone except for 8 people.

- The current population curve started 4,400 years ago.



Current growth curve based on Biblical time scales

If you start with 8 people 4,400 years ago, after Noah's Flood, a population of 6 Billion people over

4,400 years is perfectly reasonable.

Current growth curve based on Evolutionary Theory

- Evolutionists believe that the Earth is billions of years old, and that Human Life evolved millions of

years ago.

- If Human Life started 3 million years ago, we would now have a world population of 150,000 people

per square inch, and that is incredibly crowded!

- The population growth curve clearly demonstrates that Human Life did not start 3 million years ago.

The Anthropic Principle, The Fine Tuning Of The Universe

This section is adapted from the research

of Dr Chuck Missler of www.khouse.org

Our planet is exactly fine-tuned for the

existence of man. There are thousands of

parameters and ratios which are on a

knife edge. This fine tuning is so critical

that it simply could not have happened by

chance.

Examples of parameters include:

- The temperature.

- The magnetic field.

- The partial pressure of all gases.

- The rotation period of the Earth.

- The gravitational forces in the Universe.







- The water vapour saturation.

- The availability of natural resources.

An example of the Anthropic Principle.

- If this planet was 5% closer to the Sun, the water of the Earth would evaporate.

- If this planet was 1% further away all the oceans on this planet would freeze.

Secular scientists and the Anthropic Principle

Secular scientists call the finely tuned parameters on Planet Earth "The Anthropic Principle". By this, it

is implied that the fine-tuning of parameters required to support Life on Planet Earth are so highly

correlated, accurate, and interdependent that it is almost as if an external designer had created the

exact conditions for life on Planet Earth.

There is a very simple answer to the Anthropic Principle. An external designer did design and create

everything! His name is Jesus Christ!

The Bible opens with the words, "In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth," Genesis

1:1.

The Energy From The Sun

The Earth receives an incredible amount of

energy from the Sun, even though the Sun is

93,000,000 miles away. Despite this huge

distance, the Earth only receives one part in 2

trillion of the Sun's total energy.

- The Sun is only one star, among the 100 trillion

billion stars in the Universe.

- According to Donald DeYoung in "Astronomy

and the Bible p. 57", "It has been estimated that there are enough stars for every person on Earth to

have 2,000,000,000,000 (2 trillion) of them".



- It has been said that the number of stars is greater than the number of grains of sand in every

beach and desert in the world!

- The total energy in all these stars is absolutely beyond human comprehension.

- According to the First Law of Thermodynamics energy cannot create itself.

We would like Evolutionists to explain to Creationists where, in their opinion, all this massive quantity

of energy came from, in view of the First Law of Thermodynamics

The Age Of The Sahara Desert

The Sahara Desert has what it is called a

Prevailing Wind Pattern. This means that

the prevailing wind over the Sahara

desert almost always blows from the

same direction. This creates a problem.

The hot air that blows off the desert

dehydrates the trees near the edge of the

desert. These dehydrated trees die, and

the area of dead trees in then

incorporated into the desert, causing the

Sahara desert to increase in size every

year. This process is called "desertification".

The Sahara Desert is only 1300 miles North to South and it is growing at the rate of four miles per

year. Geophysicists announced recently that "the Sahara Desert is about 4,000 years old" based on

extensive studies of growth patterns of the Sahara desert, (quoted from the Potsdam Institute for

Climate Impact Research in Germany. July 15, 1999 Geophysical Research Letters).

- If the Earth is billions of years old, why is there not an older desert on the Earth?

- Why is the oldest desert on Earth only 4,000 years old?

According to the Bible:

- God created the Heavens and the Earth 6,000 years ago approximately.



- 4,400 years ago there was a world wide Flood.

- As the crust of the Earth was broken up, and water ran off the land, the geography was

dramatically altered.

- Quite soon the continents stabilised, and then vegetation started to grow again.

- According to Biblical teaching, we would therefore expect the oldest desert in the world to have an

age of approximately 4,400 years, or younger.

- The 4,000 year old age of the Sahara Desert tends to confirm the Biblical account.

The Pressure Of Oil In Oil Wells

Under the crust of the Earth, oil is found

deposited in oil wells. This oil is under

considerable pressure. The pressure in oil

wells is measured in pounds per square

inch or psi.

The pressure of oil in oil wells is 20,000

pounds per square inch (psi). This

explains why, when oil prospectors drill

down into the Earth's crust for the oil, the

oil is forcibly ejected from the oil well,

because of the tremendous pressure.

Oil formed from organisms that once lived in the sea

- According to Holt General Science, 1988, p.294, "Oil and gas are made from "organisms that once

lived in the sea. …changed by heat and pressure"… into oil". .

- According to The Journal of Petroleum Geology Leigh Price 1983 p.32 oil can form in 1000-10,000

years!

- This subject is also discussed in "How Fast can Oil Form?" by Andrew Snelling 1990, Creation Ex



Nihilo, 12(2):30.

Oil can be created artificially

- According to Creation Ex Nihilo, Vol 12 No. 2, p. 30, in "How fast can oil form?", scientist can now

convert vegetable matter, using heat and pressure, into oil in a couple of minutes inside a laboratory.

- According to Hadden R. Appell, US Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Mines, in "Converting Organic

Wastes to Oil," oil can be manufactured in 20 minutes.

- According to Mike Riddle in "Creation/Evolution: Does it Matter what we Believe?" By, ICR, p. 28,

"In 1996 a $22.4 million proposal was approved in Western Australia that will build a plant to create

oil from sewage sludge in 30 minutes".

Geologists say the crust of the Earth could not have contained an oil pressure of 20,000

psi for more than 10,000 years

According to Creation Ex Nihilo Vol 12 No. 2, p.30 in "How fast can oil form?" geologists say that

there is a limit to how long the rocks of the Earth's crust could contain a pressure of 20,000 psi.

According to these geologists the rocks could not have contained that kind of oil pressure for more

than 10,000 years, without breaking up.

- If the Earth is billions of years old, why is oil present in oil wells, if it cannot be contained for more

than 10,000 years?

- How did the oil get there?

- How was the oil created?

According to the Bible.





At this point we have to do some reasoning, based on observations and known facts:



- About 4,400 years ago, according to the Bible, there was a Flood.

- In that Flood organic material in the form of fish, animals and people drowned.

- This organic material was greatly compressed by millions of tons of rocks, sand, gravel and mud,

which compressed the dead carcasses, producing oil.

- Many Creationists believe that coal was similarly formed by the compression of vegetable matter at

the time of Noah's flood.

The existence of oil in oil wells proves a young universe

Since, according to geologists, oil cannot be contained within the crust of the Earth for more than

10,000 years, the existence of oil in oil wells indicates that the Universe cannot be billions of years

old, but less than 10,000 years old.

Mud Deposits From The Mississippi River

According to Prentice Hall General

Science, 1992 p.145, 80,000 tons of mud

is deposited every hour by the Mississippi

River at the New Orleans Delta.

The New Orleans Delta of the Mississippi

River is enlarging every day. Scientists

have studied the Delta very carefully, and

have calculated that about 30,000 years

elapsed to move all the existing mud into

the New Orleans Delta.

Why is the whole Gulf of Mexico not full of mud?

We think that Evolutionists should explain to Creationists why, if the Earth is billions of years old, the

whole Gulf of Mexico is not full of mud by now.



- If the Earth is billions of years old, why the Gulf of Mexico not full of mud?






At this point we have to do some reasoning, based on observations and known facts:

- As water and mud washed into the newly created New Orleans Delta millions of tons of mud were

deposited in the Gulf of Mexico within a very short period of time.

- As the water run off subsided, the slow flowing Mississippi river remained, and continued to deposit

mud in the Gulf of Mexico at today's known rate of deposition.

- It may well be that, in calculating the number of years for the Mississippi river to deposit mud in theGulf of Mexico, the scientists forgot the Flood, as the Bible mentions in the time of Noah.

The Oldest Tree In The World

The Bristle Cone Pine is the oldest tree in the

world. It is estimated by scientists to be

4,300 years old, and is Earth's oldest living

organism, (Quoted from Allyn and Bacon

Biology, 1977, p.180).

- If the Earth is billions of years old, why are

there not older trees on the Earth?

- Why is the oldest tree on Earth only 4,200 years old.








- Quite soon the continents stabilised, and then trees started to grow again.

- According to Biblical teaching, we would therefore expect the oldest tree in the world to have an

age of approximately 4,400 years, or younger.

- The 4,300 year old age of the Bristle cone Pine Tree tends to confirm the Biblical account.

Studies Of The Niagara Falls

The Niagara Falls are the famous waterfalls

between Lake Ontario and Lake Erie. As inthe case of all waterfalls, there is erosion ofthe rocky ledge of the waterfall.

According to Holt Earth Science 1994, p 178,"the whirlpool action at the base of the Fallserodes the weak shale rock at the base ofthe Falls. This erosion undermines the toughDolostone layer at the top of the Falls, andfrom time to time the Dolostone breaks off,and the waterfall recedes".

In the photograph, published by the NiagaraFalls Museum Guide, the Crest Lines showthe recession of the Horseshoe Falls since1764. According to the Niagara FallsMuseum Guide, the rate of recession has been 865 feet in 185 years, or approximately 4.7 feet peryear.

According to Holt Earth Science, 1984, p.384, "the Niagara Falls was formed by weak rocks thatrapidly wore back, forming a long gorge. Geologists have found that the falls move back at anaverage rate of 4 feet per year. A gorge about seven and a half miles long runs just below theNiagara falls. A simple calculation shows that it has been about 9,900 years since the Niagara Riverstated cutting its gorge back from Lake Ontario".



Known facts about the Niagara Falls

- The Niagara River runs North from Lake Erie to LakeOntario.

- The Niagara Falls are slowly being eroded, so that the

recession of the Niagara Falls causes the waterfalls toslowly move South towards Lake Eyrie.

- The Niagara Falls used to be further North, but haseroded 7.5 miles towards Lake Eyrie since 1764.

Why do the Niagara Falls exist at all?

- We would like to Evolutionists to explain to Creationistswhy, if the Niagara Falls are billions of years old, and therate of recession is 4.7 feet per year, why the Niagara Fallsexist at all.

- At the known rate of recession, the Niagara Falls shouldhave eroded all the way back to Lake Eyrie billions of yearsago.




- As the crust of the Earth was broken up, and water ran off the land, the geography wasdramatically altered.

At this point we have to do some reasoning, based on observations and known facts.

- According to Biblical teaching, we would therefore expect the oldest waterfalls in the world to havean age of approximately 4,400 years, including the Niagara Falls.

- 4,400 years ago there was a Flood, and as the Flood water ran off about half of the flood waterfrom Lake Eyrie washed out almost immediately.

- The Niagara Falls have been eroding the rocky ledge for the last 4,400 years only.

- The existence of the Niagara Falls tends to confirm the Biblical Creation account.



The Saltiness Of The Oceans

There is a well established water cycle. In

the water cycle, rain falls from the clouds,

runs off the dry land into the sea, and is

evaporated by the heat of the Sun from

the sea back into the clouds.

The water cycle causes mineral salts to be

deposited in the oceans

- After rain falls from the clouds 30% of

the water runs into the ocean.

- The water that runs into the ocean

leaches mineral salts out of the soil and

river basins.

- The mineral salts are transported by the rain water into the oceans.

Evaporation removes fresh water from the oceans, leaving the mineral salts behind.

- As a result, the oceans are gaining salt every day.

- The oceans today are 3.6% salt.

- Using estimated rates of increasing mineral salt deposition on the oceans, the oceans could have

gone from fresh water to salt in less than 5,000 years.

The known saltiness of the oceans, and the "Old Earth Theory" of the Evolutionists

If the Earth is billions of years old why are not the oceans saltier than they actually are? For example,

the Dead Sea is estimated to have a salt content in excess of 30%. If the water cycle has been in

existence for billions of years, as claimed by Evolutionists, the oceans\should be much saltier than

they actually are.

A commonly asked question is "How did fresh water fish survive the Food of Noah, when the whole

world was covered in water? "

There is an assumption that the water that covered the earth in Noah's Flood was "sea water", or

"salt water". In fact, the water that covered the Earth in Noah's flood was almost certainly fresh



water, since there was no rain before Noah's Flood, and therefore no salt washed into the seas.

The fact that the ocean is salt water today is because the oceans are getting saltier every day. Since

the Flood 4,400 years have elapsed, which are a lot of days for the fresh water to get saltier.

Today we observe fresh water fish and salt water fish. We also observe fresh water alligators and salt

water alligators. These changes are adaptations to the increasing saltiness of the water, and are in no

way related to Evolution.

The Diameter Of The Sun

According to official sources, the Sun is

shrinking.

Direct measurements of the diameter of

the Sun

_ Since 1836, more than one hundreddifferent observers at the Royal

Greenwich Observatory, and the U.S.

Naval Observatory, have made direct, visual measurements that suggest that the Sun's diameter is

shrinking at a rate of about 0.1% each century or about five feet per hour.

- It has been calculated that only "11,210,959 years ago the Sun would have been touching the

Earth" ( Quoted from :John A. Eddy and Aram A. Boornazian, "Secular Decrease in the Solar

Diameter, 1863-1953," Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 11, No.2, 1979, p. 437).

- These figures are totally inconsistent with a Universe billions of years old.

Indirect measurements of the diameter of the Sun

Several indirect techniques also confirm that the Sun is shrinking, although these inferred that the

Sun's collapse is only about 1/7th as much.

- Using these figures, "the Sun would have been touching the Earth about 158,272,358 years



ago"(Quoted from David W. Dunham, "Observations of a Probable Change in the Solar Radius

between 1715 and 1979," Science, Vol. 210, 12 December 1980, pp. 1243-1245).

- The Sun would have absorbed the planets Venus and Mercury.

- The shrinking diameter of the Sun is consistent with a young Universe, and totally inconstant with a

Universe billions of years old.

The Quantity Of Helium Present On The Earth

As elements decay they produce Helium. This Helium slowly escapes through the rocks into the

atmosphere. Very little Helium is able to escape into space.

- After all factors are considered the Helium in the atmosphere indicates the Earth is less than two

million years old (Quoted from "Blowing Old Earth Belief Away", J. Sarfati, Creation 20(3) p.19-21

1998).

- The amount of Helium present suggests an age of the Universe no more than 11,000 years old.

Polonium Halos in Granite prove Creation, and disprove the Big BangTheory

Most text books teach that, in its early

life, the Earth was a hot molten mass

formed as a result of the Big Bang billions

of years ago.

According to this theory, the Earth slowly

cooled down over millions of years,

leaving a hot molten central core, with

the cooled Earth's crust.



Holt Earth Science 1994, p. 280

According to Holt Earth Science, "As Earth formed, its surface was similar to the surface of the moon

today. Craters, like those in the picture, and large plains of volcanic basalt may have marked its

surface. But unlike its moon, Earth's surface was hot, and there were large pools of bubbling lava".

The Bible and the Creation of the Earth

The Bible does not describe the Earth as ever being a hot molten

mass!

To the contrary, the Bible states in Genesis1:1, 2, "In the beginning

God created the Heavens and the Earth. The Earth was without

form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the

Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters". According

to the Bible, the Earth was formed under water, by God, and not as

a result of the Big Bang Theory.

We therefore have two completely different accounts of the

formation of Planet Earth. We suspect that the Bible is the correct

version of events. This has in fact been proved by the existence of Polonium Halos found in granite all

over the world.



POLONIUM HALOS

Robert Gentry, whose excellent research may be read at

www.halos.com has written a remarkable book, "Creation's Tiny

Mystery". In the book Robert Gentry describes the results of his

studies of samples of granite from all over the world.

He discovered that granite contains Polonium Halos. Polonium is

one of the many elements that make up the Periodic Table, and the

Halos are the result of radioactive decay of this element over a very

short period of time.

Polonium has a very short half life

Polonium is a radioactive isotope that decays very rapidly. This is

described technically as having a very short half life.

- The isotope Po-218 has a half life of 3 minutes.

- The isotope Po-214 has a half life of only 0.164 seconds.

Polonium Halos

As Polonium atoms emit radioactive particles, the atoms are

surrounded by Halos of radioactive particles.

http://www.halos.com/





Example 1

A Polonium Halo may be likened to a firework exploding in the night sky. If the sky is captured in a

photograph, such as this one, then the image of the "Firework Halo" can be preserved for posterity.

Example 2

Another example would be an effervescent tablet dissolving in a

glass of water. As the effervescent tablet dissolves in the water,

the effervescence in the water rapidly disappears. However, if the

water was frozen at a very early stage, the effervescence would be

visible in the ice.

Effervescence observed in ice would be an indication of almost

instantaneous freezing of the water.

POLONIUM HALOS MAY BE OBSERVED IN SAMPLES OF

SOLID ROCK FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD

Polonium Halos could have formed only if the rapidly decaying

Polonium atoms, and the Halos of radioactive particles around theatoms, had been instantly encased in solid rock, with the emission

of radioactive particles preserved as Polonium Halos.

These observable Polonium Halos provide undeniable evidence that

the first created Polonium atoms were instantly preserved in solid granite, since the half life of

Polonium is 3 minutes at most.



POLONIUM HALOS PROVE CREATION

Polonium Halos are found in granite samples all over the world, and

may be viewed using a microscope.

The occurrence of these Polonium Halos in granite samples from all

over the world indicates that the Earth was formed in an extremely

short time, in complete harmony with the Biblical record of Creation

in Genesis Chapter 1.

Polonium Halos found in samples of granite - caption

THE BIG BANG THEORY REFUTED

If the Earth was originally a hot molten mass which took millions of

years to cool down, the radioactive particles emitted by the rapidly

decaying Polonium, and accompanying Polonium Halos, would

disappear in the molten lava, in the same way as an effervescent

tablet in a glass of water.

The existence of Polonium Halos in granite samples from all over

the world therefore completely disproves the Big Bang Theory.

Ancient Calandars Indicate A Young Earth

The year 2000 A.D is the year 4700 on the Chinese calendar (see

http://www.brokersys.com/~kcyong/cny.html ).

The year 2000 A.D. was the year 5759 on the Hebrew calendar.

For more on ancient calendars see Creation Ex Nihilo Feb. 2000, p. 46

Why do ancient calendars start only approximately 6,000 years ago for the Hebrew

Calendar, and approximately 4,700 years ago for the Chinese Calendar?

- We would like to Evolutionists to explain to Creationists why, if the human race is millions of years

old, ancient calendars only go back 6,000 years and 4,700 years approximately.

- We would like the Evolutionists to explain to the Creationists why there is a difference in these very

http://www.brokersys.com/~kcyong/cny.html





recent dates.

- If the human race is millions of years old, why are there not older calendars available?

- Why is the oldest calendar on Earth only 6,000 years old.




At this point we have to do some reasoning, based on observations and known facts.

- According to Biblical teaching, we would therefore expect the oldest calendars in the world to have

an age of approximately 6,000 years.

- The Bible is a record of the Hebrew people, and we would expect their calendar to be 6,000 years

old approximately.

- 4,400 years ago there was a Flood, and the whole human race was drowned except for 8 Hebrewsurvivors.

- All other races, according to the Bible, were descendents of Noah's family, through his sons Shem,

Ham, and Japheth (see Genesis 5:32).

- We would therefore expect the Chinese calendar, and all other calendars other than the Hebrew

calendar, to start approximately 4,400 years ago, at the time of the Flood.

- The existence of the Hebrew and Chinese calendars tends to confirm the Biblical Creation account.



The Great Barrier Reef, Australia

Parts of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia

were destroyed in World War II by ships

anchors and explosives. Following this,

environmentalists in Australia devised an

experiment to observe the rate of re-growth of

the coral of the Great Barrier Reef. After

carefully observing the re-growth of the Reef

over 20 years, they calculated that the

estimated age of the Great Barrier Reef, based

on their calculations, is 4,200 years old

(Quoted from Creation Ex Nihilo Vol. 8 No. 1,p.).

- If the Earth is billions of years old, why is there not an older Reef on the Earth?

- Why is the oldest corral reef on Earth only 4,200 years old?






- Quite soon the continents stabilised, and then reefs started to grow again.

- According to Biblical teaching, we would therefore expect the oldest reef in the world to have an

age of approximately 4,400 years.

- The 4,400 year old age of the Great Barrier Reef tends to confirm the Biblical account.



The Evolution Account Is The Opposite Of The Biblical Creation Account

The following scriptures, amongst many

others, indicate that God created the

Heavens and the Earth.

- Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning God

created the Heavens and the Earth,"

- Psalms 8:3, "When I consider thy

Heavens, the work of thy fingers, the

moon and the stars, which thou hast

ordained".

- Psalm 19:1, "The Heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament shows His handiwork".

- Isaiah 45:18, "For thus says the LORD, who created the Heavens, who is God, who formed the

Earth and made it, who has established it, who did not create it in vain, who formed it to be

inhabited: "I am the LORD, and there is no other."

- John 1:1-4: "In the beginning was the Word (Jesus Christ), and the Word was with God, and the

Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without

Him nothing was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men."

- Colossians 1:15-17: "He (Jesus Christ) is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all

Creation. For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and

invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through

Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist."

Everything about the Evolution Theory is the reverse of the Bible's Creation Account, as this table

demonstrates:

Bible Evolution

In the beginning, God No God

Earth before the Sun and stars Sun and stars before the Earth

Oceans before land Land before the oceans

Light before the Sun Sun, Earth's first light

Atmosphere between two water layers Atmosphere above a water layer

Land plants, first life forms created Marine organisms, first forms of life

Fruit trees before fish Fish before fruit trees

Fish before insects Insects before fishLand vegetation before Sun Sun before land plants



Marine mammals before land mammals Land mammals before marine mammals

Birds before land reptiles Reptiles before birds

In Conclusion

- If Creation is true, there is a Creator.

- If Evolution is true, there is no Creator.

The universe made itself.

- If Creation is true, there are rules given

by God, called the Ten Commandments.

- If Evolution is true, there are no rules,

and we make rules up as we go along,

according to the majority vote.

- If Creation is true, there is a purpose to life.

- If Evolution is true, there is no purpose to life.

- If Creation is true, we are a fallen race, and we need a Saviour.

- If Evolution is true, we are an evolving race, and we do not need a Saviour.

- If Creation is true, sin bought death into the world.

- If Evolution is true, death is a means of removal of inappropriately adapted species, and Evolutionof the best adapted species.

- If Creation is true, there is an after life.

Documents

Evolution is Impossible - By Dr Richard Kent