Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Patricia B. Tissera
EVOLUCION QUIMICA DEL UNIVERSO
Patricia B. TisseraInstituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
In the last years, studies of chemical elements obtained in the Local Universeand at high redshifts have improved dramatically.
Chemical patterns are the result of different mechanisms which contribute togalaxy formation
growth of the structure:collapse, mergers, infall, etc
gas cooling and condensation
star formation and stellar evolution
supernova feedback:chemical + energy release
environmental effects: starvationstrangulation, etc
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
Supernova feedback is one of the process that contribute to structure the Insterstellar Medium (ISM).
CHEMICAL ENRICHMENT HYDRODYNAMICAL HEATING
•SN: Main source of heavy elements
•Change the cooling time
•evaporates cold-dense gas •galactic winds which can results
in outflows or galactic fountains
•Regulates the star formation activity and enriches the ISM and IGM•Affects the gas dynamics
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
WHY DO WE CARE ABOUT METALLICITY ?
Chemical abundances and dynamical properties provide more stringentconstrains for galaxy formation models.
Eggen, Lynden-Bell & Sandage (1962): “galactic archaeology “ proposingthe so-called monolithic collapse model from studies of halo stars.
The MCM was first challenged by Searle (1977) : Galactic globular clustersshow a wide range of metals abundances essentially independent of radius from the Galactic Center.
The importance of fossil signatures in the chemical/dynamical patterns whichcan be related to the history of formation.
Patricia B. Tissera
THE MILKY WAY
BULGEDM HALO
THIN DISCTHICK DISC
STELLAR HALO
Patricia B. Tissera
Patricia B. Tissera
Freeman & Bland-Hawthorn 2002
Patricia B. Tissera
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
The Local Group
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
GalaxiesLuminosity-metallicity and mass-metallicity relations:
There are well-known LMR and MMR in the local Universe.Observations suggest evolution in the zero point and slope of both relations.
SDSS: Tremonti et al .2004
Erb et al 2006: z~2.5
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
Damped Lymanα Systems
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
Damped Lymanα Systems
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
The study of the Formation and Evolution of Galaxies requires to be able tofollow the evolution of the structure in large scale, which is mainly determined
by gravitation,gravitation, and to describe the action of other processes such asgas cooling, star formation, stellar evolutiongas cooling, star formation, stellar evolution, etc.
Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics simulations are one of the mostpopular techniques to study galaxy formation.
However, the complex interaction of the non-linear gravitationalevolution and dissipative gas dynamics plus the action ofseveral physical process which introduce their own lengthand time-scales make the modelling of galaxy formation a severechallenge.
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
Simple one-zone model was discussed by Van den Bergh (1962) , Schmidt (1963)Four hypothesis:
The system is isolated: no inflows or outflows.The systems is well mixed at all timesThe systems starts from primordial abundances: Z(0)=0IMF and nucleosynthesis yields are unchanged
Instantaneous recycling
CHEMICAL FEEDBACK
There are numerous chemodynamical models for galaxy formation which have sofisticated the Simple Model (e.g. Larson 1976; Tinsley & Laron 1979; Burkert & Hensler 1988; Ferrini et al. 1992; Chiappini, Matteucci & Gratton1997):
sophisticated stellar evolutionpoor initial conditions for galaxy formation
Patricia B. Tissera
Patricia B Tissera
CHEMICAL FEEDBACK
Including chemical enrichment by individual elements provides a powerful tool to study galaxy formation in cosmological scenarios:
First attempts to introduce chemical feedback in SPH simulationsof MilkyWay type galaxies:
There are implementations that follow the metallicity (Springel & Hernquist2003 and references therein)
Steinmetz & Muller (1994) SNII; global metallicityRaiteri et al. (1996; also Berczik 1999) SNII & SNIa; Fe & HCarraro et al. (1998)
Mosconi, Tissera, Lambas & Cora. (2001): SNII & SNIa, 13 ele.Lia, Portinari & Carraro (2002):detailed SE; difusionKawata & Gibson (2003):SNII, SNIa,IS; Eth +EkinKobashashi (2004):detail SE; Eth +EkinScannapieco, Tissera, White, Springel (2005): SNII & SNIa, 13 +
Multiphase+SNE
Patricia B. Tissera
Gravity
Patricia B. Tissera
Patricia B. Tissera
Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
FEEDBACK
Numerical space Physical space NeedStar particles � Stellar populations
↔
IMF:SNe
long-lived stars
M* > 10 Mo; typical life-times: ~ 106 yrType II Sne
Main source of iron (Fe)Typical life-times: ~ GyrType Ia Sne
Produce most O, Si, Ca, etc
YIELDS
Patricia B. Tissera
When SN explosions take place, they distribute metals according to the SPH technique. For a given chemical element x at a particle i,
Exploding star particle
Gaseous neighbours
CHEMICAL FEEDBACK
Mxi = ∑j mj/ρj Mxi W(rij,hij)
Mxj =mj/ρj Mxi W(rij,hij)
Each neigbhour will receive
i j
Patricia B. Tissera
Sutherland & Dopita (1993).
At T= 10000 and ρ= ρ*:τcool for primordial gas is 50 largerthan that of [Fe/H]=0.5 gas.
CHEMICAL FEEDBACK
τcool ∝ T /ρ Λ(T)
Patricia B. Tissera
ENERGY FEEDBACK: Problems that we want to solve
Formation of spiral galaxies: angular momentum content,dynamical and chemical properties.
Galactic outflows: transportation of enriched material intothe intergalactic and the intercluster media.
Formation of dwarf galaxies.
Regulation of the star formation process.
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
OUR MODEL:
We develop a new model to eject the SN energy and a modification to the SPH formalism so that different phases in the gas component can coexist.
Patricia B. Tissera
SN energy (1051 ergs each SN) released by a star particle is distributedwithin its gaseous neighbours.
The Cold/DiffuseCold/Diffuse neighbours of a star particle:T < 8 × 104 K and ρ > 0.1 ρ*
εrad radiated away
εcold cold and densecold and dense neighboursεhot =1- εhot - εcold diffusediffuse neighbours
Patricia B. Tissera
ENERGY FEEDBACK
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
Cold gas particles accumulates it ina ReservoirReservoir until it is highenough to ensure that the gasparticle will join “its own hot phaseits own hot phase”according to the decoupling scheme.
Diffuse gas particles thermalize the energy “instantaneously”.
ENERGY FEEDBACK
Patricia B. Tissera
Milky Way Type galaxy: Multiphase ISM
Patricia B. Tissera
Milky Way Type galaxy: Multiphase ISM
25kpc/h
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
10^12Mo/h
10^9Mo/h
NO FEEDBACK FEEDBACK
Star formation is regulated without introducing anymass scale parameter.
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera
100 kpc/h
Patricia B. Tissera
Chemical properties of baryons together with dynamical andkinematical information can provide clues for unveiling the historyof formation of the structure.
Patricia B. Tissera
Supernova feedback is a key process in the formation of the structure.
Modelling SN feedback is tricky but it is possible if a multiphaseISM is also modelled.
Numerical simulations provide a tool to interpret observational data within a cosmological model.
Patricia B. TisseraPatricia B. Tissera11th Latin-American Regional IAU Meeting
December 12 – 16 2005
Patricia B. Tissera
MILKY WAY:THIN DISC
Rotationally supported: σ/V <<1.Scale-length ~ 2-2.5 kpc (Siegel et al. 2001), hz ~ 280 pcStellar age distribution ~ [2,14]Gyr and [Fe/H] peaks at ~ -0.2
(Nordstrom et al. 2004)
IAG-Lenac Advanced School
Patricia B. Tissera
scale-lenght ~ 3 kpc , hz ~ 1 kpc (assuming a double exponential) .t_medio ~ 12.5 +- 1.4 Gyr (Liu &Chaboyer 2000)-2.2 < [Fe/H] <0.5 with <[Fe/H]> ~ -0.6 (Chiba & Beers 2000) higher [O/Fe] than the stars in the thin disc.
MILKY WAY:THICK DISC
IAG-Lenac Advanced School
thick
thin
Patricia B. Tissera
MILKY WAY: BULGE
hz ~ 2 kpc; averged age ~ 10 Gyr for stars with hz > 400 pcmetallicity peak: [Fe/H] ~ -0.3 dex ( Zoccali et al. 2003).lower [O/Fe] with respect to halo starsthere are young stars and on-going star formation
( Van Loon et al. 2003)
IAG-Lenac Advanced School
Patricia B. Tissera
MILKY WAY: STELLAR HALO
J/M ~ 0 (Freeman 1987); sopported by dispersion<[Fe/H] > ~ -1.5 dex (Ryan & Nories 1991;Chiba & Beers (2000)
(σr, σphi, σz ) ~ (141, 106, 94) km/s
IAG-Lenac Advanced School
halo
Patricia B. Tissera
with decoupling
without decouplin
Pearce et al. (1999, 2001)
Patricia B. Tissera
with decoupling
without decouplin
Pearce et al. (1999, 2001)