48
Ethnic Enclaves and Transnational Fields José Luis Molina, Miranda J. Lubbers, and Hugo Valenzuela Globalisation, Transnationalism & Development Colloquium Maastricht Centre for Citizenship, Migration and Development (MACIMIDE) January 14, 2015 MICINN - CSO2012-32635 Emprendimiento Social: Embeddedness Local, Social Networking Sites y desarrollo teórico (ENCLAVE).

Ethnic Enclaves and Transnational Fields...Ethnic Enclaves and Transnational Fields José Luis Molina, Miranda J. Lubbers, and Hugo Valenzuela Globalisation, Transnationalism & Development

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Ethnic Enclaves and Transnational Fields

    José Luis Molina, Miranda J. Lubbers, and Hugo Valenzuela

    Globalisation, Transnationalism & Development Colloquium

    Maastricht Centre for Citizenship, Migration and Development (MACIMIDE)

    January 14, 2015

    MICINN - CSO2012-32635 Emprendimiento Social: Embeddedness Local, Social Networking Sites y desarrollo teórico (ENCLAVE).

  • Research question

    • What is the relation between transnational structures and (ethnic) enclaves (economic and/or residential)?

    • What are the dynamics that account for the emergence of enclaves (serendipity, diffusion, models, circulation of work and capital, scales …).

  • Sections

    1. Current Social Theory limitations about people, places and networks.

    2. Examples of enclaves and transnational fields (or structures)

    3. The case of Romanians in Castellón (Spain)

    4. Methodological options.

  • 1. Social Theory: People, places, and networks

    Single place

    People Homogeneous

    Community Gemeinschaft Mechanic solidarity

    People Diverse

    Gesellschaft Organic solidarity Organizations Public sites Crowds

  • People, places, and networks

    Single place Different Places

    People Homogeneous

    Community Gemeinschaft Mechanic solidarity

    Migration mobility

    People Diverse

    Gesellschaft Organic solidarity Organizations Public sites Crowds Super-diversity?

    Super-diversity?

  • People, places, and networks

    Single place Places Origin Destination Origin and

    Destination

    People Homogeneous

    Community Gemeinschaft Mechanic solidarity

    Migration mobility

    Diaspora Enclave Transnational field /space

    Circular migration …

    People Diverse

    Gesellschaft Organic solidarity Organizations Public sites Crowds Super-diversity

    Super-diversity

    - - -

  • Places

    Spatial segregation high Spatial segregation low

    People Homogeneous

    Neighborhoods Enclaves Ghettoes

    Condominiums Colonies

    (Romanians in Castellón?)

    People Diverse

    Cluster, District?

    Cosmopolitanism?

  • 2. Examples of (ethnic) enclaves connected with transnational

    structures

    • Indian shops in Lloret de Mar (Costa Brava).

    • Textil cluster in Uriangato-Moroleón (México)

  • Indians shops in Lloret de Mar

  • Project: Ref.: Profiles of Ethnic Entrepreneurship. (2010-2012). Perfiles del

    Empresariado Étnico en España. MICINN CSO2009-07057). IP. JL Molina González

  • Comparing personal networks

  • Comparing Indian Owners -

    Employees

    Left: owners (N=6, 270 nominations). Right: employees (N=9, 405nominations).

    Geographic dispersion differences (formula 1) (M owners = 5.58, SD = 1.15; M employees = 6.50, SD = .18; t > = -2.35, df = 8.38, p < .05).

  • Indians in Lloret de Mar

  • 2. Textile cluster - Uriangato-Moroleón (México)

    Alejandro García-Macías

  • Moroleón

  • Uriangato

  • Moroleón

  • Uriangato

  • Moroleón

  • Uriangato

  • 3. Romanians in Castellón

    • Bucur, R. (2011). Réseaux migratoires roumains en Espagne. Stratégies et territoires de vie à Castellón de la Plana (Comunidad Valenciana). Université d’Angers - Université Jaume I Castellón.

    • Bernat, J. S., & Viruela, R. (2011). The Economic Crisis and Immigration: Romanian Citizens in the Ceramic Tile District of Castelló (Spain). Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, III, 45–65.

    • (…)

  • Romanians 2003-2008

  • Methods for eliciting transnational networks

    Mazzucato et al. 2007

    Mouw et al. 2014 Molina et al. 2014

    Goal Measuring simultaneity. Comparing discourses and facts

    Measuring the effect of transnational positions in influence (contagion)

    Measuring transnational (emergent) structures

    Design Random sample (N= 106), Network survey + personal networks selected (N=33) in the destination country (Amsterdam). Matching alters recruited by Egos in Ghana (several locations)

    Binational link-tracing survey (Guanajuato N=410; North Carolina or Houston N= 197) about people living or coming from Guanajuato (both sending and destination countries)

    Quota sample (N= 75, 25 in each group). Selection of a focal place. Personal networks in destination country (Barcelona)

  • Option 1

    Mazzucato, V. (2007). Bridging boundaries with a transnational research approach: A simultaneous matched sample methodology. In M. A. (ed) Falzon (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography (pp. 215–232). Farnham: Ashgate.

  • Method

    • Long preparatory phase (10 months!) identifying alters in different locations in the the sending country from Egos in the destination country with multiple name generators.

    • Matching contacts in the most important locations with the aid of the same informants.

    • Simultaneous interview/ participant observation with the informants within the transnational network, identifying both transactions and local dynamics.

  • SMS

  • Option 2

    • Molina, J. L., Petermann, S., & Herz, a. (2014). Defining and Measuring Transnational Social Structures. Field Methods. doi:10.1177/1525822X14556254

  • Methodology

    • Selecting a focal place.

    • Collecting personal networks geolocalised from a selected groups.

    • Look for different levels of embeddedness in the transnational structure (mobile, non-mobile, mixed embeddedness …)

    • The anonymized dataset is publicly available (http://visone.info/wiki/index.php/Signos_%28data%29).

    http://visone.info/wiki/index.php/Signos_(data)http://visone.info/wiki/index.php/Signos_(data)http://visone.info/wiki/index.php/Signos_(data)

  • Filipino (“tunnel”)

  • Sikh (“funnel”)

  • Chinese (“diaspora” …)

  • Option 3

    • Mouw, T., Chavez, S., Edelblute, H., Verdery, A., Carolina, N., & Hill, C. (2014). Binational Social Networks and Assimilation : A Test of the Importance of Transnationalism. Social Problems, 61(3), 329–359. doi:10.1525/sp.2014.12192.

  • Method

    • Link-traced sample: selection of “seeds” in both Mexico and the USA (“people from Guanajuato”).

    • Seeds: 12 in North Carolina and 5 in Houston - 20 in Guanajuato. Controls RDS-like.

  • * White nodes are located in the United States (North Carolina or Houston) and black nodes are located in Mexico. Mow et al. 2014.

  • Missing data or no connections?

  • How to proceed?

    • Ethnographic account.

    • Quota sampling of Romanians in Castellón.

    • Personal networks with at least 3 name generators – Active contacts in Castellón.

    – Active contacts in Dambovita.

    – Active contacts in other places.

    • Whole network of associations – organizations.

    • Fieldwork in Romania tracing back the contacts.

    • Same methodology …

    • Whole network + personal networks.

  • The world is not flat …

    • Network of “organizations” and associations in Castellón and related organizations in Dambovita.

    • Multilevel analysis: whole network of individuals and whole network of organizations.

  • Csango de Moldavia (Hanna Kónya)

    Red de todos los nombrados en el “asunto Csang”o por ubicación

    Figura 7: Red de todos los nombrados en el asunto Csango por ubicación y su pertenencia o falta de esta al grupo Csango Leyenda: ●Moldavia, ● Rumania pero Moldavia, ● Hungría, ● Otros, ●No hay datos; ○Csango, □ No Csango.

  • Hope?

  • Thanks to Ramona Bucur and Alejandro García Macías for sharing

    with me their maps.

    Thanks for your attention!

    [email protected]