Upload
ravi-kumar
View
222
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
1/28
1 | P a g e
ERRORS IN FINISHING PROCESS
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED
QC : Quality Checker
QA : Quality Auditor
PO : Purchase Order
EDI : Electronic Data Interface
DC : Delivery Chain
NQA : Nominated Quality Auditor
AQL : Accepted Quality Level
UPC : Unique Product CodeGOH : Garment on Hangers
METHODOLOGY
The work methodology of the project is carried out by following steps:
1. Selection of Buyers2. In depth study of packing processes of respective buyers3. Value Stream Mapping4. List out the packing errors accounting for the major part of the claim5. Making cause and effect diagram for each problem6. Pareto chart7. SIPOC (Supplier Input Process Output Customer)8. Data collection plan9. Data action plan10. VSM of solutions (Value Stream Mapping)
Detailed Methodology:
Selection of Buyers:
Our main focus was on Eddie Bauer and Ralph Lauren. The selection was madebased on the amount of claims received from the Buyers in the last 6 months i.e.November 2013 to March 2014.
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
2/28
2 | P a g e
In depth study of packing processes of respective buyers:
1. The process flow of Tommy-Hilfiger:
tommycopy.xlsx
2. The process flow of Kohls:
kohls.xlsx
3. The overall packing process:
PROCESS FLOW OFPACKING copy.xlsx
4. The process flow of wash-care label:
wash care and sizelabel process.xlsx
Value Stream Mapping:
With the help of VSM we have shown the flow of material as well as information inthe whole process of packing.
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
3/28
3 | P a g e
List out the packing errors accounting for the major part of the claim:
The below shown table contains the total percentage of the individual error for whichclaims have been received by Karle International in the last six months.
Errors of packing process in Kohls:
Shipment Month Buyer Ship QuantityWrong/Missing
Packing List Wrong RatioWrong /Missing
UPCDuplicate
Carton LabelWrong Type of
Pack
WrongCartonLabel
December'11 Kohls $ 9,43,611.6 18.18% 0.49% 0.42% 3.55%January'12 Kohls $ 2,32,796.9 27.92% 4.55% 100% 1.40%February'12 Kohls $ 6,52,130.11 9.21% 3.47% 0.19% 0.95%August'11 Tommy $ 3,895 1.91%September'11 Tommy $ 2,887.5 0.20%October'11 Tommy $ 3,95,198.51 75% 1.23% 0.89% 1.11%December'11 Tommy 0.73% 0.72%November'11 Tommy $ 9,48,327.08 1.19% 0.43%January'12 Tommy $ 2,81,904.65 0.56% 0.86%February'12 Tommy $ 1,29,024.8 0.08% 0.23% 0.16% 0.07%March'12 Tommy $ 1,296 21.15% 0.05% 0.09%April'12 Tommy 0.31%
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
4/28
4 | P a g e
The table is given below in which all the Kohls errors are mentioned:
Errors of Kohls Frequency % of error found Cumulative %Wrong Ratio 4356 79.8 79.809
Wrong Packing 459 8.4 88.218Wrong/Missing UPC 312 5.7 93.934
Wrong wash carelabel 288 5.3 99.21
Wrong carton labels 39 0.7 99.924Duplicate carton
labels 4 0.1 100
Errors of packing process in Tommy-Hilfiger:
The table is given below in which all the Tommy- Hilfigers error of packing ismentioned:
Errors of Tommy Frequency % of error found Cumulative %
Wrong Ratio 2307 94.05% 94.05%
Wrong/Missing Poly-bagSticker 53 2.16% 96.21%
Wrong/Missing UPC 38 1.55% 97.76%
Duplicate Carton labels 30 1.22% 98.98%
Wrong Packing List 15 0.61% 99.59%
Packing list not sent 10 0.41% 100%
79.8
8.4 5.7 5.30.7 0.1
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
% of error found
Cumulative %
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
5/28
5 | P a g e
So, from the above tables we have listed down the below mentioned errors of whichwe have carried out a detailed study and made cause and effect diagram -
Cause and Effect diagram of packing errors:
SIPOC:
We used this method to find the answers of some questions like-
1. Where does the process start and end?2. What are the major steps in the process?3. What are the primary process of inputs and outputs?4. Who are the key customers of the process (both internal and external)?5. Who are the key suppliers of the process (both internal and external)?6. What are the requirements of the customers?7. Where do the errors occur (in which steps)?8. At which stage errors can be rectified?9. At which stage errors can be detected?
This method is used for each and every step of the packing procedures which isgiven below:
Cause and EffectDiagram(1).vsd
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
6/28
6 | P a g e
SIPOC OF KOHLS
1. Pick garment pi ece from the tabl e Garment picked
2. Lay the garment on the table Garment laid on its back
Ironing operator and endlineinspector
Iron and endline inspectedgarment
3. Iron the sle eves and front Sl eeves and front irone d
Sub-store Hanger 4. Pick up a hanger kept on the table Hanger picked
Sub-store and ironingoperator
Hanger and half ironedgarment piece
5. Put the hanger inside the garment Hange r inserted
Half ironed garment withhanger inserted
6. Lay the garment again on the table Garment laid on its front
Iron and Half ironed garmentwith hanger inserted
7. Iron the back of the garment and backsleeve
Back and back sleeves ironed
Ironed garment with hanger
inserted in it
8. Keep the ironed garment on the side of the
table
Garment ironed and hanger
inserted
Ironing operator
End l ine inspector End l ine inspected garment
Size crown attaching operator
IRONING AND PUTTING HANGERSSUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
7/28
7 | P a g e
1. Pick ironed garments from the ironingtable
Ironed garment picked fromironing table
2. Keep the garments on the size crown
attaching table
Ironed garment kept on the
table
3. Pick one ironed garment One garment picked
4. See the size on the garment from the sizelabel
Size seen
Sub-store Size crowns5. Pick appropriate size crown from the size
crown containerSize crown picked
Sub-store and ironingoperator
Size crown and ironedgarment
6. Put the size crown on the hangerSize crown attached to the
hanger
Size crown attaching operatorSize crown attached ironed
garment7. Hang the garment on the hanging rack
Size crown attached garmentshanged
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
Tagging Operator
Ironing operator Ironed garments
PUTTING SIZE CROWNS ON HANGERS
Size crown attaching operatorSize crown attached hanged
garment1. See the size crown of the hanged garments
on the hanging rackSize crown seen
Tagging operator Kimble gun 2. Holds the kimble gun on one hand Kimble gun held
Sub-store Tags3. Picks up the appropriate tags from the
containerTag picked
Sub-store, tagging operatorand size crown attaching
operator
Tag, kimble gun and sizecrown attached hanged
garments
4. Tags the hanged garment with the kimblegun
Garment tagged
Tagging operator Tagged garments5. Keep the tagged garment hanging there
onlyTagged garment kept
Checking Operator
TAGGINGSUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
1. Pick tagged hanged garments from thehanging rack
Garments hanged
2. Keep the garments on the checking tableGarments kept on checking
table
3. Lay the garment on the checking tab le Garmen t l aid
4. Check the stiches, embroidery and thematches the tags and the upc number
Garment checked
Sub-store and taggingoperator
Arrow sticker and defectedpiece
5. Put the arrow sticker where defects occur Sticked attached
Tagging Operator Defected garments 6. Keep the defected pieces aside Defected pieces kept aside
Tagging OperatorChecked and approved
garments7. Keep the checked and approved garments
back on the hanging rackChecked and approved
garments kept on hanging rack
Tagged hanged garmentsTagging Operator
CHECKINGSUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
8/28
8 | P a g e
1. Take the hanging racks loaded with hangedgarments to the packaging area
Hanging racks sent to packingarea
2. Check and match the size crowns of thehanged garments with the size label (auditor) Checked hanged garments
3. Enter the packing area Packing area entered
2. Keep the garments from the hanging rackson the storage racks
Unloaded hanging racks broughtback
Empty hanging racks3. Take the unloaded hanging racks back to
the production floorUnloaded hanging racks brought
back
Hanging racks with hangedchecked garments
Ratio makerTransporter
TRANSPORTATIONSUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
Supervisor Ratio details 1. See the ratio details Details seen
2. Picks hanged garment from the storageracks
Hanged garments picked
3. Keep it on the same storage rack onanother end
Hanged garment kept
4. Make app ro pri at e rat io of hange d garmen ts R at io made
Ratio makerBunch of hanged garments in
ratio5. Keep the bunch of arranged hanged
garments in ratio on the adjacen t storage rackBunch pf arranged hanged
garments in ratio kept
Hanged garmentsTransporter Poly-bag Packer
RATIO-MAKINGSUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
Sub-store Poly-bag 1. Pick A poly-bag Poly-bnag picked
Ratio-maker Hanged garments in ratio2. Pick the Hanged garments in ratio f rom the
storage rackHanged garments picked
3. Put the hanger ends in the hole of the poly-bag
Hanger end put in the hole ofPoly-bag
4. Insert the poly-bag over the garments onhangers
Poly-bagged garments
Poly-bag packing operatorPoly-bagged ratio packed
garments5. Put the poly-baged garments on the same
storage rack at another end of the rackPoly-bagged garments stored at
the end of the rack
Poly-bag and Hangedgarments
carton packerSub-store and Ratio-maker
POLY BAG PACKING
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
9/28
9 | P a g e
Flat carton 1. Pick flat carton Flat carton picked
Flat carton and tape 2. Prepare the final carton Final carton prepared
Ratio maker Ratio packed polybag3. Pick ratio packed poly-bags from the
storage racks as per packing detailsRatio-packed polybags pikced
Ratio maker and carton makerRatio packed polybag and final
carton
4. Put the appropriate ratio-packed polybagsin the final carton and lock hangers' end with
the thread loopRatio-packed polybags kept
5. Close the final carton Final carton closed
6. Store the final carton in the adjacent areaas per PO number in the form of a stack
Final carton stored
Carton packer and productionfloor
Stack of packed cartons andtrolley
1. Put the stack of the packed cartons on thetrolley
Cartons kept on trolley
Loaded trolley with packedfinal cartons
2. Move the trolley from the packing area tothe scanning area
Trolley moved
Loaded trolley with packedfinal cartons
3. Unload the final cartons on the scanningarea
Cartons unloaded
Empty trolle y 4. Take the troll ey back to the packing are a Troll ey sent back
1. Pick a packed carton Carton picked
2. Keep the carton on the table Carton kept
Printer Sticker 3. Scans a sticker Sticker scanned
Printer and transporter Sticker and carton 4. Put the sticker on the carton Stickered carton
Carton 5. Open the carton carton opened
Han ge r packs 6. Tak e o ut th e rati o p ack ed han ge r p ack sratio packed hanger packs
takenb out
Hanging rack and hanger pack 7. Hang the hanger packs on the hanging rackHanger packs kept on hanging
rack
scanner and tagged garments 8. Scan the tag of each garment of the h anger
packtags scanned
9. Moves the scanned hange r packs to theother end
hanger packs moved
10. Pick the scanned hanger packs from thehanging rack
scanned hanger packs picked
Scanner hanger packs andsame carton
11. Keep the scanned hanger packs in thesame carton
scanned hanger packs kept incarton
Packing operator and sub-store
Packed carton and tape 12. Seal the carton with tape carton sealed
Sub-store and packingoperator
Token no. sticker and tapedcarton pack
13. Put the token no. of the scanningoperator on the tape
token no. put on carton seal
Packing operator and sub-store
Sea led car tons 14 . Keep the ca rton as ide in the fo rm of st ack sea led cartons kep t a side
Transporter
Packed carton
Scanning operator andtransporter
Transporter
Transporter
Scanned hanger packedgarments and hanging rack
Scanning operator
Transporter
Scanner
SCANNING
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
Transporter
Packed final carton
Store
Carton packer
TRANSPORTATION TO SCANN ING AREA
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
CARTON PACKING
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
Pack ing operato r Seal ed cartons and t ro ll ey 1. Load the s eal ed carton on the Trol ley Seal ed cartons l oaded
2. Bring loaded Trolley to the CTPAT area Trolley brought to CTPAT area
3. Unload the Sealed cartons from the TrolleySealed Cartons unloaded from
the trolley
Sealed cartons4. Keep the sealed cartons arranged as per PO
in CTPAT areaSealed cartons properly
arranged as per PO
Buyer QALoaded trolleyTransporter
TRANSPORTING OF SEALED AND SCANNED TO CTPAT AREASUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
10/28
10 | P a g e
SIPOC OF TOMMY-HILFIGER
6. Finding the location for the tagging inthe garment
Tagged Garments
Tagged Garment
3. Segregate the ironed garmentsaccording to sizes and keep aside on
table as a bundle
Size segregated ironed-folded garments
Size segregated ironed-foldedgarments
Iron and Folding Operator
4. take the particular bundle from thetable
bundle picked
Sub-Store
Next packing operator
Laid Garments
Ironed picked
Ironed Sleeve
Sleeve Balancing Checked
Ironed Garment
Garments kept on the tagging table
Tag Picked by the operator
TAGGINGPROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMERINPUTSUPPLIER
Bundle of folded garments ofdifferent sizes
Tags
1.pick ironed and folded garment fromironing table
2. Keep garments on the Tagging Table
5. Picks Tags from tag container based onthe size of the garment checked last
7.Tag the garment with the Kimble Gun
8.Keep the bundle aside after tagging
Kimble Gun, tags, iron andfolded garments
Tagging Operator
Iron Operator
Folded garments
Measured & Ironed garment
Folded garment
Final Ironed & Folded garmentat side of the Table
2. Laying the garment on the table
3. Picking the iron
4. Iron the sleeve
5. Check the balancing of the sleeve
Ironed garments &Measurement scale
Folding pattern & Ironedgarment
IRONING AND FOLDINGSUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
End line inspectedgarments
Iron
Iron and End lineinspected garments
End line inspector
Iron Operator
End line inspector
Tagging Operator6. Iron the front and back
7. Measure the garment with the help ofmeasurement scale
8. Keep the folding pattern on thebackside of the garment
9. Fold the garment
10. Pick the garment and keep it aside
1. Picking the garment from the table
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
11/28
11 | P a g e
Polypacking operator Size sticker applying Pattern Pattern Picked5. Pick the size sticker applying pattern (L-
shaped)
6. Keep pattern on poly-packed garment
9. Put the size sticker on the polybag
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
Tagging Operator
Sub-store
Kanban Auditor
1. Picks up each Tagged garment
2. Remove Size and Sleeve descriptivesticker
3. Picks up one Poly-bag
4. Put the garment in Poly-bag
10. put the Poly-packed garment on tableor in storage bin/sample carton
Tagged Garments
Poly-bag
Tagged Garments and polybag
CartonsStore
Tagged Garments Picked
Stickers removed
Poly-bag Picked
Poly-packed Garments
Poly-packed Garments kept ontable/bin
7. Pick the Size Sticker
PUTTING SIZE STRIPE ON THE TAGGED GARMENT
Pattern and Polypackedgarment
Size stripe sticker
Size stripe sticker and polybag
Sub-store
Sub-store and TaggingOperator
Sticker Applying Operator
1. Pick the tagged folded garment
2. Pick the size stripe from the container
3. Remove the size stripe from the cover
4. Put the size stripe on the garment at aspecified position
5. Keep the size striped garment aside
Pattern Kept on polybag
Size Sticker picked
Bare size-sticker
Size Stickered polybag
Poly-packer
Tagged folded garment
Size sticker
Size sticker and TaggedFolded Garment
Stickered Tagged FoldedGarment
Garment Kept on table
Sticker picked
Bare size stripe
Size-striped tagged garment
Size-striped garment kept aside
Putting garment in poly-bag(Solid Packing)SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
Tagging Operator and Sub-store
Polypacking operator
Sub-store
Tagging Operator
Sub-store and PolypackingOperator
8. Remove the size sticker from its cover
Ratio-bundle made
Bundle kept on packing pattern
Tagged Garments and ratiodetails
Putting garment in poly-bag(Ratio Packing)SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
1. Take garment pieces from sizesegregated bundles
3. Make a ratio bundle as per ratio detail s
Bundle and Packing Pattern
Poly-bag
Stack , Packing pattern andPoly-bag
Blister Packed Garments
Tagging Operator
Tagging Operator and PackingSupervisor
Packing operator
Sub-store
Packing operator and sub-store
Packing operator
Tagged Garments
Poly-bag pickedScanning operator
Garments picked
4. Keep the ratio arranged Bundle onpacking pattern
5. Pick the Poly-bag
6. Insert bundle in a poly-bag with thehelp of packing pattern
7. Remove the packing pattern
8. Seal the Poly-bag
9. Keep sealed blister in storage bin
Garments inserted in the poly-bag
Packing pattern removed
Poly-bag sealed
Sealed blister kept in storage bin
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
12/28
12 | P a g e
Packing operator2. keep those garments/pieces a t a
specified cartons as per item no.
3. Send the empty unloaded cartonsback to the production floor
garments picked
garments kept in the specifiedcartons
Empty unloaded cartons sent
Loaded Cartons from
production floorGarment pieces from
unloaded cartons
Empty unloaded cartons
6. keep the final cartons in the scanningarea
CartonsStore
Poly-packed garments
card-board, Poly-packedgarments
Ratio-packed cartons
Production floor
Store, Production floor
Ratio-packer
1. See the details on the cartons
3. picks the Poly-packed garments from
the stored cartons
2. Prepare cartons
4. put garments into the final carton asper packing details5. Put the card-board on top of the poly -packed garments
Details Observed
Prepared cartons
Poly-packed garments picked andkept in final carton as per details
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
1. Brings the Trolley to the particularTable
2. Load Cartons on the Trolley
3. Send loaded Trolley to Holding area
4. Unload the Cartons in Holding Area
Trolley
Approved Poly-packedgarments
Trolley loaded wi th cartons
Cartons received at CPTAT area
Stores
Stacked/stored cartons which mayor may not be in ratio
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
1. Take out garment/pieces from the
unloaded cartons
Packer on the production
floorTransporter
Holding area
CUSTOMER
1. Pick up any polypack from carton orfrom table
2. Open the polybag
3. Keep the garment on the table
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT
Poly opened
Garment laidPoly-packerTransporter
6. Put signature on the sticker of thepolypack
poly-packed garments
stickers, Poly-packed garment
Carton packing done
Final packed cartons kept
HOLDING AREA
Scanner
Packing AreaLine QA
Solid Packing Final Cartons
Kanban Auditor
4. Check sewing and balancing
5. Put rejected garment pieces back toend line inspection
Sewing and balancing checked
Rejected garments sent back
Approved garmentsSub-store, Poly-packer
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
TRANSPORTATION OF CARTONS/PIECES TO CTPAT AREA
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
13/28
13 | P a g e
Prepared cartons
Details verified
Final packed carton
1. Prepare the final cartons
2. verify the details of the final cartons
3. keep the Blister packed garment in thefinal carton
4. put the card-board on top of the blister
5. keep the final carton in the scanningarea
Final Cartons
Final Cartons and Blisterpacked garment
Card-board and final carton
Store
Store & Production floor
Store
Packing operator
Bundle/Blister Packing Final CartonsSUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
Final packed cartons kept
ScannerBlister packed garments kept in
final cartons
Card-board kept
INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
SCANNING of SOLID PACKING
Manual Counting
1. Picks carton near the scanning table
2. open the carton
3. Unload cartons contents on thescanning table
4. Scan the tag/polybag stickers of theindividual garments
5. Put the garments in same Poly-bag
6. put the poly-packed garments in thesame final carton
8. Put the carton sticker on the specifiedposition on the carton
9. Tapes the carton
Arranged sealed cartons
Poly-packed garments kept in thecartons
Stickered Cartons
Ratio packer
Scanning Operator and Poly-packer
Tagging Operator
Scanning Operator and Ratiopacker
Printer, scanner and ratiopacker
Sub-store and Scanningoperator
Scanning Operator
Taped Cartons
Poly-packed ScannedGarment and carton
Carton sticker,printer andfinal carton
Scanned garment & blister
Blister & final carton
2. Open the Carton
3. Unload carton contents
4. Open Blister
5. Take out garments
6. Scan tag of each garment
8. Put Blister in carton after scanning thewhole stack of garment
Packed final carton
Blister
Scanner & Tagged garment
Tape and stickered carton
scanned and sealed cartons10. keep the scanned cartons according toPO
Final Packed Cartons
Scanner and Poly-packedGarments
Tagged Garments and Polybag
Cartons Brought
Cartons opened
Carton Unloaded
Tagged Scanned
Re-polypacked garments
SUPPLIER
Carton sticker & final carton
CUSTOMER
1. Picks carton near the scanning table
7. put the stack of garments in Blister
12. Keep cartons as per PO
Cartons picked
Carton opened
Carton contents unloaded
Blister opened
Garments taken out
Scanned tags
Re-packed Blister
Blister kept in carton
Stickered carton
Taped carton
Arranged carton
9. Take print out of carton sticker & tearthe sticker from printer
10. Paste the carton sticker on the carton
11. Tape carton
Printer Sticker generatedStore
Store Printer7. Take print out of carton sticker & tear
the sticker from printerSticker generated
Tape and final carton
Final carton
Packing area
Production floor
Packing area & Productionfloor
Scanning operator &production floor
Production floor & Packingarea
Printer & Packing area
Sub-store & Packing area
Packing area
SCANNING of BLISTER PACKING
SUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT
Buyer QA
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
14/28
14 | P a g e
7. Keep the cartons at the specifi cposition according to PO number
Buyer QA
CUSTOMER
1. Pick the scanned cartons from thestored area
2. Unload the scanned carton on the table
3. Count manually
4. Check the garment's tags
5. After 100% counting, keep thegarments in the cartons
Cartons picked and unloaded
Counted & checked Garments
Garments kept in cartons
Taped cartons6. Tapes the carton
OUTPUT
MANUAL COUNTING
Counting operator, Sub-store& Scanning operator
Counted & checked garments
Counted Garments, Tape &cartons
SUPPLIER
Scanning Operator
Counting operator
Arranged Taped CartonsCounting operator
INPUT PROCESS
Taped cartons
Scanned Cartons
Poly-packed scannedgarments
7. send cartons to the specified location
Buyer
Approved garments brought
Re-packed garments
Counted garments
Verified
Final cartons re-packed
Cartons sealed
Cartons sent
1. Bring Buyer QA Approved garments forrepacking
2. Repacks the garments in poly bag
3. Manual counting
4. Verify with the packing list
5. Put garments in the same final cartons
Sealed cartons
Buyer QA
Supervisor
Buyer QA
Re-packing Operator and sub-store
Re-packing Operator
Approved garments
6. Seal cartons with Buyer tapePacked cartons and buyer
tape
Approved garments andpolybag
Packing list
Verified garments and finalcartons
REPACKINGSUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
RE-PRINTSUPPLIER INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT CUSTOMER
1. Check carton sticker
2. Make note of damaged stickers
3. Select the serial no. of cartons fromthe software
4. generate stickers for those serial nos.
Audited cartonsManual counter
Buyer
Store
Printer5. Paste re-printed stickers on respective
cartons
Note made
Serial no. of damaged stickersselected
Sticker re-printed
Re-printed stickers pasted
Buyer QA
Stored cartons
Damaged cartons
Software & Serial no.
Printer
Re-printed Sticker & cartons
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
15/28
15 | P a g e
Data Collection Plan:
The below mentioned formats have been generated to collect data about day to dayerrors occurring in the packing process of Tommy and Kohls. With the help of thesewe can also come to know that where the errors are being detected and how muchof each error is occurring on daily basis.
data collection.xlsx
Data Detection Plan:
In this plan, we have made random visits to each floor to check at which point theoperators are deviating from the SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) of eachprocess of the respective buyers. We have visited all floor i.e. from 12A, 12B, 12C,12D, 12E and 12F from 23 rd June, 2012 to 30 th June, 2012.
data detection
plan.xlsx After making the random samples, we have calculated the percentage of deviatingprocedures in each packing process.
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
16/28
16 | P a g e
40 - 75 BETWEEN 40 TO 75 PERCENT>75 GREATER THAN 75 PERCENT
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
17/28
17 | P a g e
After this, we have made a table where we put together the deviating points and theirdetection points as well as their percentage occurrence of each error (floor wise).
ERRORS DETECTION POINTS OBSERVATION POINT % ERROR
No size segregation of garments before tagging71.43%More than one tag container at one table 57.14%
Tag container without cover 14.29%No size/colour marking on tag container 85.71%
No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments onthe table
14.29%
No checking of garments size label before tagging0.00%
Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 0.00%
No display of sample of tags of running item no. on table85.71%
Carton packing No tagging details displayed on the table71.43%Each piece is scanned against a fixed ratio based onthe software being used
No round container 14.29%
FS Audit Tags kept on table instead of tag container0.00%Final Carton AuditBuyer QA Audit
At the time of ironing and folding (in some cases)Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 0.00%
No immediate packing of ratio bundleNo complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
At the time of packing in poly-bag
At the time of ScanningAt the time of FS Audit/ Carton Audit
Buyer QA AuditFS Audit Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ scanning0.00%
Final Carton Audit
DETECTION POINT OF 12-A
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(inmaximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
the stripes kept on the table
Takes out the required sizes' pieces from the stack ofthe garment(containing pieces of all the sizes in
disorgarnized order) by looking at size label/pricelabel OR Size tag at the time of packing
WRONG CARTONLABEL
Buyer QA AuditMix up of two or more carton stickers on the scanning table0.00%
DUPLICATE CARTONLABELS
Final Carton Audit
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(inmaximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
the stripes kept on the table
WRONG TAG
MISSING TAGS
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
18/28
18 | P a g e
ERRORS DETECTION POINTS OBSERVATION POINT % ERROR
No size segregation of garments before tagging60.00%More than one tag container at one table 0.00%
Tag container without cover 86.67%
No size/colour marking on tag container 93.33%No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments on
the table100.00%
No checking of garments size label before tagging 0.00%
Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 13.33%
No display of sample of tags of running item no. on table100.00%
Carton packing No tagging details displayed on the table100.00%Each piece is scanned against a fixed ratio based on
the software being used No round container 80.00%FS Audit
Final Carton AuditBuyer QA Audit
At the time of ironing and folding (in some cases) Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ tagging13.33%No immediate packing of ratio bundle 31.25%
No complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
At the time of solid-packingAt the time of Scanning
At the time of FS Audit/ Carton AuditBuyer QA Audit
At the time of scanning No ratio details displayed on the table 68.75%Buyer QA Audit No size segregated tagged garments on the table18.75%
No checking of size of garments before making ratio0.00%No immediate packing of ratio bundle 31.25%
No details of the current style no. 68.75%No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments on
the table100.00%
Not making ratio packs in the area allotted for the operation0.00%Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 25.00%
No cartons to put the garments 43.75%No complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
Forgetting to replace rejected garments 0.00%FS Audit Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ scanning0.00%Final Carton AuditBuyer QA AuditFinal Carton AuditBuyer QA AuditFS Audit
DETECTION POINT OF 12-B
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(inmaximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
the stripes kept on the table
Takes out the required sizes' pieces from the stack ofthe garment(containing pieces of all the sizes in
disorgarnized order) by looking at size label /pricelabel OR Size tag at the time of packing (ratio packing
or solid packing)
WRONG TAGS
Tags kept on table instead of tag container 6.67%
WRONG CARTONLABEL Mix up of two or more carton stickers on the scanning table 0.00%
DUPLICATE CARTONLABEL
0.00%
Doing job carelessly @ scanning 0.00%
WRONG RATIO
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(inmaximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
the stripes kept on the table
At the time of ratio packing
MISSING TAGSDoing job carelessly @ scanning
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
19/28
19 | P a g e
ERRORS DETECTION POINTS OBSERVATION POINT % ERROR
No size segregation of garments before tagging64.29%More than one tag container at one table 21.43%
Tag container without cover 100.00%
No size/colour marking on tag container 100.00%No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments on
the table100.00%
No checking of garments size label before tagging 7.14%Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 14.29%
No display of sample of tags of running item no. on table100.00%
Carton packing No tagging details displayed on the table100.00%
Each piece is scanned against a fixed ratio based onthe software being used No round container 92.86%
FS Audit
Final Carton Audit
Buyer QA AuditAt the time of ironing and folding (in some cases) Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ tagging14.29%
No immediate packing of ratio bundle 100.00%No complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
At the time of solid-packingAt the time of Scanning
At the time of FS Audit/ Carton AuditBuyer QA Audit
At the time of scanning No ratio details displayed on the table 33.33%Buyer QA Audit No size segregated tagged garments on the table66.67%
No checking of size of garments before making ratio0.00%No immediate packing of ratio bundle 100.00%
No details of the current style no. 66.67%No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments on
the table100.00%
Not making ratio packs in the area allotted for the operation33.33%Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 0.00%
No cartons to put the garments 33.33%No complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
Forgetting to replace rejected garments 0.00%FS Audit Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ scanning16.67%Final Carton AuditBuyer QA AuditFinal Carton Audit
Buyer QA AuditFS Audit
DETECTION POINT OF 12-C
0.00%
MISSING TAGS
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(inmaximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of Doing job carelessly @ scanning
At the time of ratio packing
16.67%
WRONG TAGS
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(inmaximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
the stripes kept on the table
Takes out the required sizes' pieces from the stack ofthe garment(containing pieces of all the sizes in
disorgarnized order) by looking at size label/pricelabel OR Size tag at the time of packing (ratio packing
or solid packing)
Tags kept on table instead of tag container
WRONG RATIO
Doing job carelessly @ scanning 16.67%
WRONG CARTONLABEL Mix up of two or more carton stickers on the scanning table
DUPLICATE CARTONLABEL
0.00%
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
20/28
20 | P a g e
ERRORS DETECTION POINTS OBSERVATION POINT % ERROR
No size segregation of garments before tagging88.89%More than one tag container at one table 22.22%
Tag container without cover 100.00%No size/colour marking on tag container 77.78%
No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments onthe table
100.00%
No checking of garments size label before tagging 0.00%Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 22.22%
No display of sample of tags of running item no. on table88.89%Carton packing No tagging details displayed on the table88.89%
Each piece is scanned against a fixed ratio based onthe software being used
No round container 88.89%
FS Audit
Final Carton AuditBuyer QA Audit
At the time of ironing and folding (in some cases) Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ tagging22.22%No immediate packing of ratio bundle 100.00%
No complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
At the time of solid-packingAt the time of Scanning
At the time of FS Audit/ Carton AuditBuyer QA Audit
At the time of scanning No ratio details displayed on the table0.00%Buyer QA Audit No size segregated tagged garments on the table0.00%
No checking of size of garments before making ratio0.00%No immediate packing of ratio bundle 100.00%
No details of the current style no. 0.00%No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments on
the table100.00%
Not making ratio packs in the area allotted for the operation0.00%Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 0.00%
No cartons to put the garments 0.00%No complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
Forgetting to replace rejected garments 0.00%FS Audit Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ scanning0.00%Final Carton AuditBuyer QA AuditFinal Carton AuditBuyer QA AuditFS Audit
DETECTION POINT OF 12-D
WRONG TAGS
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(in
maximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
the stripes kept on the table
Takes out the required sizes' pieces from the stack ofthe garment(containing pieces of all the sizes in
Tags kept on table instead of tag container 0.00%
WRONG CARTONLABEL Mix up of two or more carton stickers on the scanning table
DUPLICATE CARTON
LABEL
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
MISSING TAGS
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(inmaximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
Doing job carelessly @ scanning
At the time of ratio packing
WRONG RATIO
Doing job carelessly @ scanning
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
21/28
21 | P a g e
ERRORS DETECTION POINTS OBSERVATION POINT % ERROR
No size segregation of garments before tagging80.00%More than one tag container at one table 40.00%
Tag container without cover 80.00%No size/colour marking on tag container 80.00%
No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments onthe table
100.00%
No checking of garments size label before tagging0.00%Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 0.00%
No display of sample of tags of running item no. on table60.00%Carton packing No tagging details displayed on the table80.00%
Each piece is scanned against a fixed ratio based onthe software being used
No round container 80.00%
FS AuditFinal Carton AuditBuyer QA Audit
At the time of ironing and folding (in some cases) Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ tagging0.00%No immediate packing of ratio bundle 33.33%
No complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
At the time of solid-packingAt the time of Scanning
At the time of FS Audit/ Carton AuditBuyer QA Audit
At the time of scanning No ratio details displayed on the table33.33%Buyer QA Audit No size segregated tagged garments on the table33.33%
No checking of size of garments before making ratio0.00%No immediate packing of ratio bundle 33.33%
No details of the current style no. 66.67%No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments on
the table33.33%
Not making ratio packs in the area allotted for the operation0.00%
Doing job with carelessness and insincerely33.33%No cartons to put the garments 0.00%
No complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
Forgetting to replace rejected garments 0.00%FS Audit Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ scanning0.00%Final Carton AuditBuyer QA AuditFinal Carton Audit
Buyer QA AuditFS Audit
DETECTION POINT OF 12-E
WRONG TAGS
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(in
maximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
the stripes kept on the table
Takes out the required sizes' pieces from the stack ofthe garment(containing pieces of all the sizes in
Tags kept on table instead of tag container
MISSING TAGS
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(inmaximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
Doing job carelessly @ scanning
At the time of ratio packing
WRONG RATIO
Doing job carelessly @ scanning
WRONG CARTONLABEL Mix up of two or more carton stickers on the scanning table
DUPLICATE CARTONLABEL
20.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
22/28
22 | P a g e
ERRORS DETECTION POINTS OBSERVATION POINT % ERROR
No size segregation of garments before tagging80.00%More than one tag container at one table 50.00%
Tag container without cover 90.00%No size/colour marking on tag container 90.00%
No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments onthe table
100.00%
No checking of garments size label before tagging 0.00%Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 30.00%
No display of sample of tags of running item no. on table80.00%Carton packing No tagging details displayed on the table80.00%
Each piece is scanned against a fixed ratio based on
the software being usedNo round container 90.00%
FS AuditFinal Carton AuditBuyer QA Audit
At the time of ironing and folding (in some cases) Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ tagging30.00%No immediate packing of ratio bundle 0.00%
No complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
At the time of solid-packingAt the time of Scanning
At the time of FS Audit/ Carton AuditBuyer QA Audit
At the time of scanning No ratio details displayed on the table 0.00%Buyer QA Audit No size segregated tagged garments on the table0.00%
No checking of size of garments before making ratio0.00%No immediate packing of ratio bundle 0.00%
No details of the current style no. 50.00%No divisions made for keeping the size segregated garments on
the table100.00%
Not making ratio packs in the area allotted for the operation0.00%Doing job with carelessness and insincerely 0.00%No cartons to put the garments 50.00%
No complete scanning of garment pieces in a carton0.00%
Forgetting to replace rejected garments 0.00%FS Audit Doing job with carelessness and insincerely @ scanning0.00%Final Carton AuditBuyer QA AuditFinal Carton AuditBuyer QA AuditFS Audit
DETECTION POINT OF 12-F
WRONG TAGS
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(inmaximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
the stripes kept on the table
Takes out the required sizes' pieces from the stack ofthe garment(containing pieces of all the sizes in
Tags kept on table instead of tag container
MISSING TAGS
The operator looks at the tag of the garment(inmaximum cases) and based on the information, picksup the size stripe of the same size from the bunch of
Doing job carelessly @ scanning
At the time of ratio packing
WRONG RATIO
Doing job carelessly @ scanning
WRONG CARTONLABEL Mix up of two or more carton stickers on the scanning table
DUPLICATE CARTONLABEL
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
23/28
23 | P a g e
VSM Solutions:
Through VSM, we have shown that in a particular process, what things may gowrong and whether it can be rectified or not. There are some solutions which wehave suggested through VSM.
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
24/28
24 | P a g e
CONCLUSION
Findings:
We have seen that, the main problem is that the information is not properly
communicated to the operators Second point is that, even if the operator has been given information about
how to do the process, then also he/she will perform the work according totheir own ease, thus creating errors
At vital points in the whole process, there is lack of proper accountability
Some of the processes are as such, which are not easy to follow from theoperators point of view for example, picking the tag from the tag container. Asa result they invent their own kind of tag container, which is inappropriate
The operators do not follow the SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) Mostly the errors occur due to human errors, and the thinking of the operators
goes as such that, even if one mistake occurs that is justifiable. But theoperators are not given proper information about the consequences about theerrors.
We have found out the top five errors having maximum claims are Wrong Ratio Wrong Carton Label
Duplicate Carton Label Missing UPC Wrong UPC Wrong Wash Care Label
We have also found the reasons behind each problem. It is given below in a tabularform:
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
25/28
25 | P a g e
PROBLEM: WRONG RATIO
REASONS: No ratio details Wrong size tags on garment pieces
Garment pieces of multiple countries at one table Multiple ratio packs in one style No or improper size segregated garments No ratio details on the table Hurry, carelessness and lethargy of the operator Ineffective checkpoints such as scanning In re-packing, sometimes failing to replace the rejected garments causes wrong ratio Poor work-place No proper checking and matching of tags during ratio-packing
CHANGES TO BE MADE: Scanning after re-packing For proper scanning, the system can be fixed in the center of the table.
SOLUTION: The computer system can be fixed at the center of the table, so that the scanning operator can only unload thscanned garment pieces on one side, and after scanning the garments to be kept on the other side of the table, so that no munscanned and scanned pieces occur.
PROBLEM:WRONG CARTON LABELS
REASONS: Scanning second carton before the first is sealed Putting stickers in a hurried and careless manner Not putting carton stickers immediately after scanning Keeping multiple cartons open after scanning More than one type of stickers kept on tagging table Not changing carton sticker and packing list in case of change in quantity Changing pieces from one carton to another
Applying carton labels at the last moment all at once Ineffective checking of the operator Picking up of cartons of a different PO
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
26/28
26 | P a g e
PROBLEM: DUPLICATE CARTON LABELS
REASONS: Same sticker generated multiple times
Re-print not done for exact replacement quantity No written request for replacement of stickers Ineffective monitoring Hurry and carelessness of operator Damaged labels due to improper storage and poor storage space Damaged labels due to improper printing (printing head, wrinkling of ribbon, electricity fluctuation) Operator's unawareness of the consequences of wrong carton stickers leading to carelessness
CHANGES TO BE MADE: Make accountability
SOLUTION: There should be a written request or receipt for the carton stickers that should be re-printed and signature of thecarton
sticker printer should be there on the receipt, so that he will be accountable for the stickers that are re-pri
PROBLEM: MISSING TAGS
REASONS: Improper way of tagging, for example faulty shot of kimble gun causes missing tags if the operator dowhether the tag has been attached to the garment or not after a shot.
Tag handling at various operation may cause the tags to fall and thus cause missing tags Tagging in one or two stitches instead of four or five, thus causing the possibility of the tags falling d
breakage of stitch. Loose stiches Tagging in a hurried and careless manner
Unskilled manpower
Movement of tags in hanger packs during transportation No checking of stitch strength while tagging
No chekcing of tags immediately after tagging and ineffective checking Faulty kimble with thinner end Tags having bigger holes than required
Heavier tags in hanger packs
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
27/28
27 | P a g e
8/11/2019 Errors in Finishing Process
28/28
SOLUTION: The attaching of the wash-care labels should be carried out in the cutting section only, instead of attaching thsewing
line. After the ticketing process, there should be a sewing machine, where the attachment of the wash-care place, sothat there would not be any missing / wrong wash-care label.
PROBLEM: WRONG WASH-CARE LABELS
REASONS: Loading of non-ratio pieces due to recutting causes in wrong attachment of wash-care labels Lack of correct information from the feeding helper during the loading of re-cut pieces
Mix up of different types of wash-care label on the operation table due to poor storage of washcare labels Carelessness and hurry of the operator Ineffective super-vision Improper segregation of the wash-care labels
CHANGES TO BE MADE: Attaching of wash-care label should be in cutting only instead of occuring in the sewing line.