63
Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER SHIPS – now and in the future Presented by: Hans Otto Kristensen Head of Maritime DTU ([email protected])

Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships

leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships

23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk SelskabPASSENGER SHIPS – now and in the future

Presented by:Hans Otto KristensenHead of Maritime DTU([email protected])

Page 2: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

2 Technical University of Denmark

Content of the presentation

• Fundamentals of the EEDI calculation procedure for Ro-Ro ships (rules and regulations)

• Technical fundamentals of Ro-Ro passenger ships • Calculation example of a 1600 passenger Ro-Pax ship

• Calculation example of a 400 passenger Ro-Pax ship

• Summary of example calculations

• Conclusions

Page 3: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

3 Technical University of Denmark

The EEDI formulas (excl. equations for alternative propulsion means such as wind, solar power etc.)

MEPC 245(66) – 4. April 2014

For Ro-Ro cargo ships and Ro-Ro passenger ships:

Capacity is the maximum permissible deadweight

For passenger ships and cruise passenger ships:

Capacity is the Gross Tonnage (GT) in accordance with the internatinal Convention of Tonnage Measurement of Ships 1969, Annex 1, Reg. 3

Page 4: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

4 Technical University of Denmark

EEDI according to MARPOL Annex 6, Reg. 21

Attained EEDI <= Required EEDI x (1 – R)

Required EEDI:

Ro-Ro passenger ships: 752.16 x DWT-0.351

Ro-Ro cargo ships: 1405.15 x DWT-0.498

DWT is the maximum permissible deadweight at summer load draught

R depends on the keel laying date

Page 5: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

5 Technical University of Denmark

Reduction factor R in percent for Ro-Ro shipsEEDI = (1 – R/100) ∙ EEDI baseline value

Ship type Deadweight

Phase 0

1. Jan. 2013

31. Dec. 2014

Phase 1

1. Jan. 2015

31. Dec. 2019

Phase 2

1 Jan. 2020

31. Dec. 2024

Phase 3

1 Jan. 2025

Ro-Ro

passenger

>1000 tons n/a 5 20 30

250 – 1000 tons n/a 0 – 5 0 – 20 0 – 30

Ro-Ro

cargo

>2000 tons n/a 5 30 30

1000 – 2000 tons n/a 0 – 5 0 – 20 0 – 30

Page 6: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

6 Technical University of Denmark

EEDI requirements for Ro-Pax ships

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

Deadweight (t)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI baseline = 752.16 x DWT^(-0.381)

1. September 2015

1. January 2020

1. January 2025

Page 7: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

7 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ships Design service speed versus EEDI ref. speed

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 pass.Design condition: 15 % resistance

margin and 90 % MCR loading

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

EE

DI r

efe

ren

ce

sp

ee

d (

kn

ots

)

Page 8: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

8 Technical University of Denmark

Auxiliary power for Ro-Ro cargo ships according to MEPC 245(66)

Main engine power (PME) less than 10000 kW:

PAE = 0.05 x PME

Main engine power (PME) more than 10000 kW:

PAE = 250 + 0.025 x PME

Reg. 2.5.6.4:

For ships where the PAE value calculated by the above mentioned formulas is significantly different from the total power used at normal seagoing condition, the PAE value should be estimated by the consumed electric power (excluding propulsion) in conditions when the ship is engaged in a voyage at reference speed.

Page 9: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

9 Technical University of Denmark

Auxiliary power for Ro-Ro pass. ships for ref. line calculations according to MEPC 65/22 Annex 14, p. 3

Aux. power at sea = 0.35 x installed aux. powerAuxiliary power at sea = 0.866 x GT0.732

Installed aux. power according to ShipPax database (2012)

y = 2.4729x0.732

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000

Gross tonnage (GT)

To

tal

aux.

po

wer

(kW

)

ShipPax aux- power data

1600 pass. Ro-Pax acc. to EEDI regulations

400 pass. Ro-Pax acc. to EEDI regulations

Aux. power for ref.line calculations (MEPC 65)

Potens (ShipPax aux- power data)

Page 10: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

10 Technical University of Denmark

Auxiliary power for Ro-Ro cargo ships according to MEPC 245(66)

1600 pers. Ro-Pax ship

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

Au

xili

ary

po

we

r in

pc

t. o

f m

ain

e

ng

ine

po

we

r

Page 11: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

11 Technical University of Denmark

fj correction factor for Ro-Ro ships

MEPC .245(66) – Annex 5 – Reg. 2.8.3

Page 12: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

12 Technical University of Denmark

fc correction factor for Ro-Ro ships

MEPC .245(66) – Annex 5 – Reg. 2.12.3

Page 13: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

13 Technical University of Denmark

EEDI fj and fc correction factors for Ro-Pax

Ro-Pax ship (1600 passengers)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

corr

ecti

on

fac

tors

fj

and

fc

fj Ro-Ro pass.

fc Ro-Ropass.

Page 14: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

14 Technical University of Denmark

Low and high cargo density Ro-pax ships(Deadweight per passenger)

Ro-Ro passenger shipsDw/pass. = 849 pass.-0.689

Dw/pass. = 62.4 pass.-0.448

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200

Passengers

Dea

dw

eig

hp

t p

er p

asse

ng

er (

t/p

ass.

)

Ships with low cargo density

Ships with high cargo density

Ro-Pax limit (1.5 LM and 6 t dw per passenger)

Potens (Ships with high cargo density)

Potens (Ships with low cargo density)

Page 15: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

15 Technical University of Denmark

Low and high cargo density Ro-pax ships(Lanemeter per passenger)

Ro-Ro passenger ships

LM = 72.9 pass.-0.505

LM = 37.5 pass.-0.551

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200

Passengers

Lan

emet

er p

er p

asse

ng

er (

m/p

ass.

)

Ships with low cargo density

Ships with high cargo density

Cargo limit line (1.5 LM and 6 t dw per passenger)

Potens (Ships with high cargo density)

Potens (Ships with low cargo density)

Page 16: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

16 Technical University of Denmark

Low and high cargo density Ro-pax ships(Lpp as function of passenger capacity)

Ro-Ro passenger ships

Lpp = 81.4 pass.0.113

Lpp = 22.5 pass.0.255

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200

Passengers

Len

gth

pp

(m

)

Ships with low cargo density

Ships with high cargo density

DFDS ships with low cargo density

DFDS ships with high cargo density

Potens (Ships with high cargo density)

Potens (Ships with low cargo density)

Page 17: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

17 Technical University of Denmark

Typical low cargo density Ro-pax ship(Pearl Seaways)

Page 18: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

18 Technical University of Denmark

Typical high cargo density Ro-pax ship(Regina Seaways)

Page 19: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

19 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ships Empirical calculation of gross tonnage GT

Ro-Ro passenger ships

GT/displ. = 0.0000156 displ. + 1.16

GT/displ. = 0.0000352 displ. + 1.14

1.0

1.4

1.8

2.2

2.6

3.0

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000

Displacement (t)

GT

/t d

isp

lace

men

t

Ships with high cargo density

Ships with low cargo density

Lineær (Ships with high cargo density)

Lineær (Ships with low cargo density)

Page 20: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

20 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ships Empirical calculation of gross tonnage GT

Ro-Ro passenger ships

0

8000

16000

24000

32000

40000

48000

56000

64000

0 8000 16000 24000 32000 40000 48000 56000

Real gross tonnage (GT)

Cal

cula

ted

GT

Page 21: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

21 Technical University of Denmark

EXAMPLE No. 11600 passenger Ro-Pax ship with low cargo capacity

Main dimensionsCapacity 1600 pass.Length between pp 147.65 mBreadth 24.63 mMaximum draught 5.89 mDepth to upper deck 14.32 mLength of Ro-Ro lanes 1197 mNumber of passenger cars 420Number of berths 766 (48 % of pass.)Normal deadweight 4160 tons (3.5 t/lm)Lightship weight 9172 tonsNormal displacement 13332 tonsBlock coefficient based on Lpp 0.607Gross tonnage 21455 GTNormal service speed 21.5 knotsEngine power (MCR) 18910 kWService speed obtained at 90 % MCR incl. 15 % sea margin

Main dimensions are calculated by the generic model SHIP-DESMO-RoPax developed by Hans Otto Kristensen (HOK Marineconsult ApS) as contractual work for DTU Transport

Page 22: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

22 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersFull deadweight

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.4160 ton deadweight

Payload: 2.1 t/lanemeter

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

50

100

150

200

250

(g/t

pay

load

/nm

)

Actual EEDI valueEEDI base line - 2013EDDI requirement in 2015EEDI requirement in 2020EEDI requirement in 2025CO2 per ton payload per nm

Page 23: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

23 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersFull deadweight – Auxiliary power based on GT

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.4160 t deadweight

Aux. power based on GT

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

EE

DI (

g/t

/nm

)

-20

10

40

70

100

130

160

190

220

250

(g/t

pa

ylo

ad

/nm

)

Actual EEDI valueEEDI base line - 2013EDDI requirement in 2015EEDI requirement in 2020EEDI requirement in 2025CO2 per ton payload per nm

Page 24: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

24 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersEEDI as function of deadweight

Ro-Pax ships

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000 4400

Deadweight (t)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI required in 2015

EEDI required in 2020

EEDI required in 2025

EEDI baseline with 3 different different deadweights

Page 25: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

25 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers

Ro-Pax ship (1600 pass.)

0

4000

8000

12000

16000

20000

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Speed (knots)

Pro

pu

lsio

n p

ow

er

(kW

)

Normal deadweight 4160 tons

25 % deadweight reduction (3120 t dw)

50 % deadweight reduction (2080 t dw)

Page 26: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

26 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers 25 % dw reduction

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.3120 t deadweight

Payload: 1.6 t/lanemeter

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

(g/t

pay

load

/nm

)

Actual EEDI value

EEDI base line - 2013

EDDI requirement in 2015

EEDI requirement in 2020

EEDI requirement in 2025

CO2 per ton payload per nm

Page 27: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

27 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers 50% dw reduction

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.2080 t deadweight

Payload: 1.1 t/lanemeter

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

(g/t

pay

load

/nm

)

Actual EEDI value

EEDI base line - 2013

EDDI requirement in 2015

EEDI requirement in 2020

EEDI requirement in 2025

CO2 per ton payload per nm

Page 28: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

28 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers EEDI values at different design speeds and deadweight

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI value at 4160 t deadweight

EEDI value at 3120 t deadweight

EEDI value at 2080 t deadweight

Page 29: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

29 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers Speed exponent, N, as function of speed and block coefficient, Cb

Ro-Pax ship 1600 passengers

Power = constant x speedN

EEDI = constant x speedN-3.5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

Po

wer

exp

on

ent,

N

N = 3.5

4160 t deadweight (Cb = 0.61)

3160 t deadweight (Cb = 0.56)

2080 t deadweight (Cb = 0.51)

Page 30: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

30 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers CO2 per ton payload per nm at

different design speeds and deadweight

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

CO

2 p

er t

pay

load

per

nm

(g

/t/n

m) 4160 t deadeweight

3120 t deadweight

2060 t deadweight

Page 31: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

31 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers Variation of gross tonnage

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.Low cargo density4160 t deadweight

Change of gross tonnage

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI value at normal GT

EEDI value at 20 % increase of GT

EEDI value at 20 % decrease of GT

EEDI base line 2013

EEDI requrement in 2015

EEDI requirement in 2020

EEDI requirement in 2025

Page 32: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

32 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers Variation of gross tonnage and light weight

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass. Low cargo density4160 t deadweight. Change of gross tonnage and lightweight

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI value at normal GT

EEDI value at 20 % increase of GT and 10 % lightweight increase

EEDI value at 20 % decrease of GT and 10 % lightweight reduction

EEDI base line 2013

EEDI requrement in 2015

EEDI requirement in 2020

EEDI requirement in 2025

Page 33: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

33 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers Variation of gross tonnage and light weight

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass. Low cargo density4160 t deadweight. Change of gross tonnage and lightweight

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI value at normal GT

EEDI value at 20 % increase of GT and 20 % lightweight increase

EEDI value at 20 % decrease of GT and 20 % lightweight reduction

EEDI base line 2013

EEDI requrement in 2015

EEDI requirement in 2020

EEDI requirement in 2025

Page 34: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

34 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers Variation of gross tonnage and light weight

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.Low cargo density. 4160 t deadweight

Change of GT and lightweight

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

CO

2 p

er t

pay

load

per

nm

(g

/t/n

m)

Original deadweight

20 % GT increase and 20 % lightweight increase

20 % GT reduction and 20 % lightweight reduction

Page 35: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

35 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengers Variation of gross tonnage and light weight

Ro-Pax ship 2000 passengersLow cargo density. 4160 t deadweight

GT and lightweight change

Power = constant x speedN

EEDI = constant x speedN-3.5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

Po

wer

exp

on

ent,

N

Original deadweight

20 % GT increase and 20 % lightweight increase

20 % GT reduction and 20 % lightweight reduction

Page 36: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

36 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersFull deadweight – DUAL FUEL main engine

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.4160 ton deadweight

Payload: 2.1 t/lanemeterDUAL FUEL MAIN ENGINE

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

(g/t

pay

load

/nm

)

Actual EEDI valueEEDI base line - 2013EDDI requirement in 2015EEDI requirement in 2020EEDI requirement in 2025CO2 per ton payload per nm

Page 37: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

37 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersChange of length

Ro-Pax ship (1600 pass.)4160 tons deadweight

Change of length

0

4000

8000

12000

16000

20000

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Speed (knots)

Pro

pu

lsio

n p

ow

er

(kW

)

Normal Lpp = 147.65 m

10 % length increase

20 % length increase

Page 38: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

38 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersChange of length

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.

0

50

100

150

200

250

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

CO

2 p

er t

pay

load

per

nm

(g

/t/n

m) Original Lpp = 147.65 m

10 % length increase

20 % length increase

Page 39: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

39 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersChange of length

Ro-Pax ship1600 pass.4160 DWT

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI value at normal length

EEDI value at 10 % length increaseEEDI value at 20 % length increase

EEDI base line 2013

EEDI requirement in 2015

EEDI requirement in 2020EEDI requirement in 2025

Page 40: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

40 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersChange of length

Ro-Pax ship 1600 passengers

Power = constant x speedN

EEDI = constant x speedN-3.5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

Po

wer

exp

on

ent,

N

N = 3.5

Original length = 147.65 m

10 % length increase

20 % length increase

Page 41: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

41 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersChange of draught

Ro-Pax ship (1600 pass.)4160 tons deadweight

Change of draught

0

4000

8000

12000

16000

20000

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Speed (knots)

Pro

pu

lsio

n p

ow

er

(kW

)

Normal draught = 5.89 m

5 % draught increase

10 % draught increase

Page 42: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

42 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersChange of draught

Ro-Pax ship - 1600 pass.

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

CO

2 p

er t

pay

load

per

nm

(g

/t/n

m)

Original draught = 5.89 m

5 % draught increase

10 % draught increase

Page 43: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

43 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 1600 passengersChange of draught

Ro-Pax ship1600 pass.4160 DWT

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI value at normal draughtEEDI value at 5 % draught increaseEEDI value at 10 % draught increaseEEDI base line 2013EEDI requirement in 2015EEDI requirement in 2020EEDI requirement in 2025

Page 44: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

44 Technical University of Denmark

EXAMPLE No. 2400 passenger Ro-Pax ship with high cargo capacity

Main dimensionsCapacity 400 pass.Length between pp 160.20 mBreadth 24.97 mMaximum draught 6.07 mDepth to upper deck 14.95 mLength of Ro-Ro lanes 1530 mNumber of passenger cars 254Number of berths 257 (64 % of pass.)Normal deadweight 5681 tons (3.7 t/lm)Lightship weight 10530 tonsNormal displacement 16211 tonsBlock coefficient based on Lpp 0.651Gross tonnage 22905 GTNormal service speed 21.3 knotsEngine power (MCR) 20287 kWService speed obtained at 90 % MCR incl. 15 % sea margin

Main dimensions are calculated by the generic model SHIP-DESMO-RoPax developed by Hans Otto Kristensen (HOK Marineconsult ApS) as contractual work for DTU Transport

Page 45: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

45 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 400 passengersFull deadweight

Ro-Pax ship - 400 pass.5681 ton deadweight

Payload: 2.4 t/lanemeter

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

30

60

90

120

150

180

(g/t

pay

load

/nm

)

Actual EEDI value

EEDI base line - 2013

EDDI requirement in 2015

EEDI requirement in 2020

EEDI requirement in 2025

CO2 per ton payload per nm

Page 46: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

46 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 400 passengersEEDI as function of deadweight

Ro-Pax ships

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2800 3300 3800 4300 4800 5300 5800

Deadweight (t)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI baseline with 3 different deadweights

EEDI requirement in 2015

EEDI requirement in 2020

EEDI requirement in 2025

Page 47: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

47 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 400 passengers

Ro-Pax ship (400 pass.)

0

4000

8000

12000

16000

20000

24000

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Speed (knots)

Pro

pu

lsio

n p

ow

er

(kW

) Normal deadweight 5681 tons

25 % deadweight reduction (4261 t dw)

50 % deadweight reduction (2840 t dw)

Page 48: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

48 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 400 passengers25 % deadweight reduction

Ro-Pax ship - 400 pass.4261 t deadweight

Payload: 1.8 t/lanemeter

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

40

80

120

160

200

(g/t

pay

load

/nm

)

Actual EEDI value

EEDI base line - 2013

EDDI requirement in 2015

EEDI requirement in 2020

EEDI requirement in 2025

CO2 per ton payload per nm

Page 49: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

49 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 400 passengers50 % deadweight reduction

Ro-Pax ship - 100 pass.2840 t deadweight

Payload: 1.2 t/lanemeter

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

50

100

150

200

250

(g/t

pay

load

/nm

)

Actual EEDI value

EEDI base line - 2013

EDDI requirement in 2015

EEDI requirement in 2020

EEDI requirement in 2025

CO2 per ton payload per nm

Page 50: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

50 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 400 passengers EEDI values at different design speeds and deadweight

Ro-Pax ship - 400 passengers

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI value at 5681 t deadweight

EEDI value at 4261 t deadweight

EEDI value at 2840 t deadweight

Page 51: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

51 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 400 passengers Speed exponent, N, as function of speed and block coefficient, Cb

Ro-Pax ship 400 passengers

Power = constant x speedN

EEDI = constant x speedN-3.5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

Po

wer

exp

on

ent,

N

5681 t deadweight (Cb = 0.65)

4261 t deadweight (Cb = 0.59)

2840 t deadweight (Cb = 0.54)

N = 3.5

Page 52: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

52 Technical University of Denmark

Ro-Pax ship with 400 passengers CO2 per t payload per nm at different

design speeds and deadweight

Ro-Pax ship - 400 pass.

0

50

100

150

200

250

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

CO

2 p

er t

pay

load

per

nm

(g

/t/n

m) 5681 t deadeweight

4261 t deadweight

2840 t deadweight

Page 53: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

53 Technical University of Denmark

Quantitative conclusion/summaryfor Ro-Pax ships

The overall results of the two examples with different deadweight presented are shown in following table. The ship design consequences of the choice to reduce the deadweight for the actual ships to improve the EEDI fulfilment are also shown – unfortunately showing that the deadweight for the rolling cargo is seriously degraded

Passengers Lanemeter DW PayloadNumber of

carsPayload/LM

Permissible weight per

car

Permissible weight for a 14 m truck

EEDI at 21 knots

EEDI baseline

Margin to baseline

EEDI fullfilment

CO2 per ton

payload per nm at 21 knots

m tons tons tons/m tons tons g/t/nm g/t/nm % g/t/nm

400 1530 5681 3693 254 2.41 14.4 34 29.85 27.92 -6.9 NO 143

400 1530 4261 2769 254 1.81 10.7 25 28.44 31.15 8.7 2015 160

400 1530 2840 1846 254 1.21 7.1 17 29.43 36.36 19.1 2015 212

1600 1197 4160 2496 420 2.09 5.6 29 28.45 31.44 9.5 2015 186

1600 1197 3120 1875 420 1.57 4.1 22 27.80 35.08 20.7 2020 213

1600 1197 2080 1248 420 1.04 2.6 15 28.89 40.94 29.4 2020 288

Page 54: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

54 Technical University of Denmark

Conclusions for Ro-Pax ships

With the present formulation of the EEDI calculation procedure for Ro-Ro passenger ships (IMO Res. MEPC 245(66) – Annex 5), following conclusions can be drawn:

• The calculated EEDI value does not reflect the real environmental performance of a Ro-Ro passenger ship

• Reduction of the design speed increases the EEDI value, although the CO2 emissions per ton payload per nautical mile are reduced by lowering the speed

• Slow steaming for Ro-Ro passenger ships is an environmental option for reduction of the carbon foot print, but not legally when judged from a purely EEDI point of view

• Reduction of the deadweight is a way to reduce the EEDI value according to the present rules, such that the future requirements can be met, however resulting in poor ship designs with too small deadweight as a consequence such that only person cars and light cargo vans can be transported, but NO lorries

• The EEDI formulas are fundamentally wrong and ship designers are not able to design efficient, environmentally friendly and future orientated ships for the Ro-Ro sector

• DUAL FUEL is a possible solution for meeting the strict EEDI requirements

Page 55: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

55 Technical University of Denmark

EXAMPLE No. 32000 lanemeter Ro-Ro cargo ship

Main dimensionsCapacity 2000 lanemterLength between pp 150.45 mBreadth 23.62 mMaximum draught 6.41 mDepth to upper deck 14.86 mNormal deadweight 8064 tons (4.0 t/lm)Lightship weight 6979 tonsNormal displacement 15043 tonsBlock coefficient based on Lpp 0.644Normal service speed 18.8 knotsEngine power (MCR) 10966 kWService speed obtained at 90 % MCR incl. 15 % sea margin

Main dimensions and engine power are calculated by the generic model SHIP-DESMO-RoPax developed by Hans Otto Kristensen (HOK Marineconsult ApS) as contractual work for DTU Transport

Page 56: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

56 Technical University of Denmark

2000 lanemeter Ro-Ro cargo shipDeadweight density: 3.0 t/lanemeter

2000 LM Ro-Ro cargo ship3.0 t dw/lanemeter. Cb = 0.632

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

10 12 14 16 18 20 22Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

25

50

75

100

125

CO

2 p

er t

pay

load

per

n

m (

g/m

/nm

)

Attained EEDIEEDI base line 2013EEDI requirement 2015EEDI requirement 2020EEDI requirement 2025CO2 emissions per ton payload per nm

Page 57: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

57 Technical University of Denmark

2000 lanemeter Ro-Ro cargo shipDeadweight density: 4.0 t/lanemeter

2000 LM Ro-Ro cargo ship4.0 t dw/lanemeter. Cb = 0.644

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

25

50

75

100

125

CO

2 p

er t

pay

load

per

n

m (

g/t

/nm

)

Attained EEDIEEDI base line 2013EEDI requirement 2015EEDI requirement 2020EEDI requirement 2025CO2 emissions per ton payload per nm

Page 58: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

58 Technical University of Denmark

2000 lanemeter Ro-Ro cargo shipDeadweight density: 6.0 t/lanemeter

2000 LM Ro-Ro cargo ship6.0 t dw/lanemeter. Cb = 0.656

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

CO

2 p

er t

pay

load

per

n

m (

g/t

/nm

)

Attained EEDIEEDI base line 2013EEDI requirement 2015EEDI requirement 2020EEDI requirement 2025CO2 emissions per ton payload per nm

Page 59: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

59 Technical University of Denmark

2000 lanemeter Ro-Ro cargo shipDeadweight density: 6.0 t/lanemeter

2000 LM Ro-Ro cargo ship6.0 t dw/lanemeter. Cb = 0.656

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

CO

2 p

er t

pay

load

per

n

m (

g/t

/nm

)

Attained EEDIEEDI base line 2013EEDI requirement 2015EEDI requirement 2020EEDI requirement 2025CO2 emissions per ton payload per nm

Page 60: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

60 Technical University of Denmark

2000 lanemeter Ro-Ro cargo ship

2000 LM Ro-Ro-cargo ships

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Design speed (knots)

EE

DI

(g/t

/nm

)

EEDI for 6064 dwt

EEDI for 8064 dwt

EEDI for 12064 dwt

EEDI baseline for 6064 dwt

EEDI base line for 8064 dwt

EEDI base line for 12064 dwt

Page 61: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

61 Technical University of Denmark

2000 lanemeter Ro-Ro cargo ship

2000 LM Ro-Ro cargo ship

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

12 14 16 18 20 22

Speed (knots)

CO

2 em

issi

on

s p

er t

pay

load

per

nm

(g/t

/nm

)

6064 dwt

8064 dwt

12064 dwt

Page 62: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

62 Technical University of Denmark

2000 lanemeter Ro-Ro cargo ship

2000 LM Ro-Ro cargo ship

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

12 14 16 18 20 22Speed (knots)

Pro

pu

lsio

n p

ow

er (

kW) 3 t deadweight per lanemeter (Cb= 0.632)

4 t deadweight per lanemeter (Cb = 0.644)

6 t deadweight per lanemeter (Cb = 0.656)

Page 63: Environmental paradoxes of the new EEDI regulations for Ro-Ro ships leading to bad design of Ro-Ro ships 23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab PASSENGER

63 Technical University of Denmark

Thank you for your attentionQUESTIONS ?