Upload
maliyah-leyton
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Encouraging of Industry to R&D
”From expenditures to investments”
Dr. Heikki Kotilainen
S&T Balance
S T
S&T Balance
Fortaleciendo la alianza público-privada en América Latina:Salir de la crisis mirando estratégicamente el futuro
3-4 noviembre 2009, Santiago de Chile
National R&D Policy and Strategy
Topic Question to be answered
Main responsibility
Policy Why? Government,
Ministries, Industry
Confederations
Strategy What?
Priorities,choices
Authorities,agencies, industry, universities + all stakeholders
Tactics How? National agencies for implementation
(C) S&T Balance
2- 4 years
1- 2 years
< 1 year
Time frame
Characteristics, Concerns and Common Features of Different Cultures
Administration Company Cluster Academic
Maincharacteristics
Working with rulesSlow Motion
Common understandingof business
CompetitivenessInnovation
Scientific ambitionQuality of research
Slow Motion
Time scale ofactions
1-3 years 1-3 years 5-10 years
Generalconcern
Policy frameseconomical/social/
regional
CompetitionLegislative changes
Productivity
NetworkingSpecialisationProductivity
IPR
Quality of resourcesQuality of research
Attractivity of research
Immediate concern
Paperwork Deadline
Fraud
SalesCash
Client needsIPR
RivalryDemand conditions
Market access
PublicationsContinuityFinance
Biggestfear
Contractualfailures
Misuse of publicmoney
ConfidentialityProduct outdateMarket collapse
Rules and legislation(antitrust)
Loss of competenceand scientific
excellencePeer failure
Common ground
Values of societyEmloyment
Working ”TripleHelix”
Positive innovationatmosphere
Supportive legislationObjectives of company
Diamond modelTriple Helix
Key services, key suppliers
Sufficient publicand private
fundingAttractivity of knowledge
FlexibilityQuick decisionsFast moving
MonthsWeeks (SME)
Cultures© S&T Balance
Circulation of innovation policy
Setting policy agenda
Analysing policy
Implementation
Public interest Private interest
National strategy
Sector policies
Implementation of strategies
Instrument set-up
Research
Strategic intelligence
Policy evaluation
Impact evaluation
Performance evaluation
Policy circulation
Source: Tekes
(Council, audit)
(Ministries, agencies, universities, industry)
(Ministries, agencies, universities, industry,Evalution + outside experts)
© S&T Balance
Guidelines and Prerequisites for Establishing Innovation Policy
•Main target: High return of R&D investment
•Do not copy – no directly adaptable features
•Environment is dynamic – create a continuous process
•Consider methodology – not single tasks. Single tasks can serve as concrete examples for the creation
of process/methodology
•Iterative process- questions & answers – solutionsGuarantee the implementation of the policy
•Statistical data
•Auditing the innovation infrastructure
Guidelines© S&T Balance
Prerequisites for administration involvement in R&D
•Business and research understanding
•Genuine interest in facilitating development
•Trust by industrial community
•Trust by research community
•Money and funding opportunities
Admini.involvement© S&T Balance
BALANCE BETWEEN THE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
MAINTAIN CLEAR NATIONAL FOCUS
MANAGE KEY DEMANDS
PROACTIVE VISION
(Science and University Community, Society)
BOTTOM-UP REQUESTS
ADAPTING TO CUSTOMERS
(The Business Community, Society)
NATIONAL POLICY
National AuthoritiesAnd
Agencies
© S&T Balance
IndustryIndustryIndustryIndustry
MinistriesAgencies
Patent offices, IPR
Regional centresTE-centres
Centres of ExcellenceTechnology/Science ParksKnowledge CentresSectorial InstitutesTech Transfer officesInstitutes, labs
The Triple Helix
UniversitiesResearchinstitutes
Government
Industry
Science & Technology
Policy Council
Confederations ofIndustry
BanksVenture CapitalBusiness angels
EU Commission-state aid
-regulations-FP
SemiprivateSITRA
FinveraIndustrial Invest
Clusters
© S&T Balance
Definition of innovation
RESEARCH, KNOWLEDGE, IDEA,TECHNOLOGY
INVENTION
INNOVATION
IMITATION
BU
SIN
ES
S
Innovation def.© S&T Balance
”If innovation is the commercial application of existing knowledge in a new context,
technologically driven innovation is only one form of this. Innovation is distinct from
research, which results in new knowledgeand from the entrepreneurial function that
spots market opportunities for products and services. It is the result of the interaction of
these two functions””Innovate for a competitive Europe”,
A new Action Plan for Innovation, European Commission, 2004
CUSTOMERS
MARKETS
BUSINESS MODELS
Innovation Trends
• User-based innovations
•Merger of manufacturing and service
•Mulitidisciplinary innovations
•E-Business
•Public and private sector innovations
•Globalisation of innovations
•Small firm innovations- large firm interventions
Innov.trends
Key questions
Are you going to compete tomorrow with yesterday’s technology ?
Where are your competitors? What technology are they applying?Where are they located?
Encouragement:
National technology and innovation policy
(C) S&T Balance
Change of mindset
Don’t spend money on R&D!
You have to invest in R&D!
Consequences: You must expect return of the investment (ROI)You have to prioritize you investmentsYou have to have your own technology strategyi.e. What are the core competencies related to your business and revenue creation?What is necessary to keep in house and what can be outsourced?What are the requirements for personnel?What kind of cooperation will be needed (clusters,networks, international cooperation, university relations etc.)?
(C) S&T Balance
Technology strategy
Preservingcurrent
positionsStrategic renewal
DeclineFormation of
strategic clusters
Geographicalstrategy
Glo
bal
Nat
iona
l
Action strategy
Defensive Offensive/proactive
Tech.strat
CORE COMPETENCES
Primary capabilities
(Outsource, cooperate)
Critical capabilities(cooperate)
Core compentences
(strengthen)
CriticalSupportRelated
TECHNOLOGY FIELD PRIORISATION
Active Active Active
MonitorDevelop, ifstrategic Active
Sell SellActive, license
transfer
Follower Equal Leader
Mature
Evolving
Embryonic
© S&T Balance
1. Business definition
1. Business definition
Vision/Business target
Vision/Business target
Driftwood alternativeDriftwood alternative
Where are we?
Where should we get to?
Where are we going?
Capabilities?•Commercial•Technological•Operational•Financial
How to reach to the target?
Competitive idea•Benefit to customer
•Benefit to the companyBusiness
environment
Definition of objectives
© BCD/S&T Balance
Mission
Development Program for Business & Technology Strategy
© Business Concept Development Oy/ S&T Balance Oy
Work programme Company X
Business 2 Business 1 Business 3
1. Business definition 1B Core competencies?1A. Business area?
2. Business environment
2.E Devlmnt of envirmnt
2.F Best practice’s SWOT
2.G SWOT of our own?
2.H Company values?
2.A Markets?
2.B Customer needs?
2.C Success factors?
2.D Trends?3. Business target?
4. Competitive strategy? 4.B Competitive idea?4.A Competitive profile?
5. Way to operate?
5.D Organization?
5.A Marketing strategy?
5.B Product strategy?
6. Resources?6.A Personnel?
6.B Financing?6.C Space.location?
M1M1
M2M2
M3M3
M0M0
5.C Key contacts
Development Program for Business & Technology Strategy
10. Decision making rules7.A Principles?7.B Rules?
7.C Alloc. of resources?
11. Prioroties/actions?
12. Checking approvalTech. strategy
8.A Key issues? 8.B Action plan?
9.DCompetitive strategy?
9.E Follow up?
9.A Business definition?
9.B Business target?
9.C Description of IS
M5M5
M6M6
7.Technology needs?7.Technology needs?
M4M4
8. Importance of technologies?
8. Importance of technologies?
9. Technology sources?9. Technology sources?
Supporting Technologies
Auxiliary technologies
Key technologies?
Mark./serv.technologies
Product technologies
Manuf. technologies
Administr. technologies
Own R&D
Cooperative partners
Sub-suppliers
Technology transfer
Development Program for Business & Technology Strategy
4B1A, 3
(C) BCD/S&T Balance
What is the innovation process?Projects typically proceed in three very distinct phases
Market intelligence
Customer intelligence
BusinessBusiness intelligenceintelligence
Competitor intelligence
Technology intelligence
Product definition
& specification
Product conception
&design
Production preparation
& engineering
Explore…Explore…
Pre-conceptPre-concept
Choose/plan superblyChoose/plan superbly……
PlanningPlanning ImplementationImplementation
Product development
&
engineering
Run like hell!!!Run like hell!!!
Go decision
Market ideas& wishes
Technologyideas
Concurrent conception Concurrent engineering
Costs start to run
Source: IMDTypicalGoodBetter
Process Character of Technology Transfer
CURIOSITY
KNOWLEDGE CREATION
SCIENTIFIC EXCELLENCE
PUBLICATIONS
CUSTOMER NEEDS
MARKET&MARKETABILITY
STRATEGYPRODUCT
PORTFOLIOR&D PORTFOLIO
COMPETENCEMONEY&
FINANCINGIPR
REVENUES
RESEARCH INDUSTRY
TE
CH
NO
LO
GY
T
RA
NS
FE
R
Transfer process
ADAPTATION OFSCIENTIFIC
RESULTSFOR
TECHNOLOGICAL USE
”Requirement fortechnological success”
ADAPTATION OF
TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE
FOR INDUSTRIAL
USE
”Requirement formarket success”
Is it possible? Can we do it? How we do it? How we market it?
© S&T Balance
Cooperative research Product development
Formulation of a National ProgrammeCase: Finland
RESEARCH FACILITATOR ENTERPRISES
QUALITY:APPROPRIATE
STANDARD
RELEVANCE
EFFICACY
PUBLIC FINANCE
NATIONALPROGRAMMES
VENTURE CAPITAL
IPR PROTECTION
ARTICULATION OF NEEDS
APPROPRIATETECHNOLOGY
ABSORB NEWTECHNOLOGIES
Pres/ priorit,innovation system
SUPPLY DEMAND
Technology programmes
#54280
Steering• enterprices
Tekes• preparing• co-ordi- nating• decision making
Grants
GrantsLoansCapital loans
Company R&D projects
Public research projects
SynergyNetworking
Concurrent developmentMatching funds
Implementation of results of public research is basedon parallel execution and networking with company projects.
23 on-going programmes in 2004 with a total extent of EUR 1.2 billion a programme lasts typically 3–5 years annually 2000 company participations annually 800 research unit participations Tekes usually finances - 60–80 % of university projects - 25–50 % of company projects
(C) Tekes
Technological success rate of enterprise research projects concluded in 2002
concluded 1145 projects
611 mio. €
905 projects511 mio. €
No information 240 projects, 100 mio. €
Stopped or failed projects37 projects, 17 mio. €
Otherwise as expected, but late 188 projects
117 mio. €
Success as expected or
better525 projects278 mio. €
16 %
84 %
3 %
23 %
54 %
Number and volume of projects
Success less than satisfactory, 155 projects
99 mio. €
19 %
57305,04-2003 Copyright © Tekes
SUCCESS FACTORS for FUTURE• Curiosity
• Activity
• Cooperation ability
• Knowledge management
• Absorbing knowledge
• Application of knowledge
• Internationalisation
Prepare answer for questions, which will be asked after 5 years!!© S&T Balance